AOL Money & Finance

Neil Barofsky posts

Feed

Treasury clashes with TARP watchdog over $23.7 trillion in proposed expenditures

Did you know that we have a watchdog in charge of overseeing the TARP program? Yes, we have such a person and his name is Neil Barofsky.

Today the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve said that the group of financial programs undertaken have had a significant impact on our financial markets.

That may be true, but Mr. Barofsky reported that the sum total of these programs is exposing federal agencies to a staggering $23.7 trillion.

Continue reading Treasury clashes with TARP watchdog over $23.7 trillion in proposed expenditures

Auditor wants more TARP information

The U.S. Treasury is receiving a bit of pressure from the internal watchdog that is overseeing the U.S. government's financial bailout. The special inspector, General Neil Barofsky, wants more information from the banks that received TARP funds, and he has his own bank survey to prove it can be done.

According to Barofsky's personal study, more than 80% of the banks responding to his survey said the TARP money they received was used for loans or to avoid reduced lending. Barofsky also said that fewer than a third of the 360 banks he surveyed said their lending levels would have been lower without the TARP funds.

My biggest issue with the TARP money was that there was no requirement for the banks to track the money, or to report what the money was used for -- despite assertions that the money was to be used to increase loans, one way or the other. There has to be some way to track this, and Barofsky has proven this. Of course, this is being dismissed by Assistant Treasury Secretary Herbert Allison (the top official in charge of the program for the Treasury) because, "it is not possible to say that investment of TARP dollars resulted in particular loans, investments or other activities by the recipient." The Treasury does conduct its own survey, which reported that outstanding loan balances were flat in May.

As citizens and taxpayers, we should know what the money is spent for -- but Barofsky did note that the banks did not quantify the amount of new lending or the difference in lending from the bailout funds. However, if (as Barofsky asserts) the banks budget how they would use TARP money, then why wouldn't we be able to know more? It is our right -- at least last time I checked.

Did bankers 'cook their books' to get TARP money?

Neil Barofsky is called the TARP cop because he is the regulator responsible for investigating the "money trail" of the TARP money: where it went, which banks got some, and what they did with it. All but about $134 billion of the original $700 billion of TARP money has been spent. The TARP money was given to banks to help them shore up their balance sheets.

It seems that one condition for receiving TARP money was proof that the banks receiving it were sound. Barofsky believes that some banks "cooked the books" to get TARP money. He is quoted as saying: "I hope we don't find a single bank that has cooked their books to try and get the money but I don't think that's going to be the case." Barofsky declined to discuss specific charges but did say that they could include securities fraud, wire fraud and false statements.

Continue reading Did bankers 'cook their books' to get TARP money?

Symbol Lookup
IndexesChangePrice
DJIA-154.4810,309.92
NASDAQ-37.612,138.44
S&P 500-19.141,091.49

Last updated: November 27, 2009: 05:35 PM

BloggingStocks Exclusives

Hot Stocks

DailyFinance Headlines

Latest from BloggingBuyouts

WalletPop Headlines

AOL Business News

BioHealth Investor Headlines

Sponsored Links

My Portfolios

Track your stocks here!

Find out why more people track their portfolios on AOL Money & Finance then anywhere else.

BloggingStocks Partners

More from AOL Money & Finance