New York Yankees posts
FeedPosted Jul 31st 2009 12:10PM by Mark Fightmaster (RSS feed)
Filed under: Columns, Business of sports
It's like clockwork, seriously ... recently, every year around the Baseball Hall of Fame inductions there is news that A) Bud Selig is or isn't considering lifting the lifetime ban against Pete Rose and B) names from the list of players who tested positive in 2003 are leaked.
As for option A, Pete belongs in the Hall of Fame -- but not in baseball. I mean seriously, he has the most memorabilia in the Hall of Fame, so induction is theoretically academic. Enough of that though, I want to take a look at the steroid list and the potential economic impact on baseball.
Continue reading JockStocks: Will steroids ever drive fans away from baseball?
Posted Jun 12th 2009 2:30PM by Mark Fightmaster (RSS feed)
Filed under: Deals, Business of sports
I have never been the world's biggest soccer (football for my European readers) fan. I have attended a Columbus Crew game, that is an American Major League Soccer (MLS) team, in the past. I watch soccer sometimes when it is on ESPN, it is often the Champions League finals, and I will root for the USA during the World Cup. However, that is where my soccer fandom ends -- as far as I am concerned, "football" is the game played with the oblong, pigskin ball featuring two heavily armored teams battling on the gridiron for the ultimate supremacy in either the NFL or NCAA.
Continue reading JockStocks: Real Madrid spends real money
Posted May 22nd 2009 1:30PM by Mark Fightmaster (RSS feed)
Filed under: Consumer experience, Business of sports
As of last Sunday, Major League Baseball's regular-season attendance is down nearly 4.5% this year -- including both New York clubs, according to Reuters.
Why is the inclusion of the New York Yankees and Mets important? Because the two teams opened brand new palaces this year, both of which are smaller than the parks they played in a year ago.
Before the season, baseball officials predicted that attendance could drop as much as 10% from last year's 78.6 million -- with league revenue coming in flat compared to last year's record $6.5 billion.
Continue reading JockStocks: Saving money at a baseball game
Posted Mar 2nd 2009 12:40PM by Zac Bissonnette (RSS feed)
Filed under: Citigroup Inc. (C), Bank of America (BAC), Business of sports
Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) has said that it generates $10 in revenue for every $1 it invests in sports marketing, and nets $3 of that amount in income. In theory, taxpayers as shareholders should support these deals if they will enhance the company's ability to generate income.
But still: The company has broken off its talks for a long-term endorsement deal with the New York Yankees amid fallout from the market collapse and the government's bailout of the firm. Many Americans and politicians feel that it's hypocritical for companies like Bank of America and Citigroup (NYSE: C) to take billions in taxpayer cash and then spend hundreds of millions on naming rights for stadiums.
Continue reading Bank of America's talks with Yankees fall apart
Posted Feb 20th 2009 4:40PM by Mark Fightmaster (RSS feed)
Filed under: Competitive strategy

Let's take a trip to the "yeah right" files with this entry. Boston Red Sox owner John Henry has again picked up the torch crying for a salary cap yet again. Pot, this is the kettle. The Red Sox payroll is the fourth-highest in Major League Baseball at $133,390,035. Henry's problem is that he was outspent by his arch rival: the New York Yankees. In fact, Henry said that the Yankees spent like Congress.
For history's sake, Henry presented a salary cap five years ago (which was sour grapes in the wake of losing A-Roid to the Yankees) -- obviously this proposal never took hold. I just find it humorous that the owner of the Red Sox is calling for a salary cap. This is a team that is spending a veritable ton of money, and is succeeding. Let's take a look at the Pittsburgh Pirates, the Cincinnati Reds, the Oakland A's. All of these teams are considered "small market" teams. One would think that one of their owners would be yelling for a cap -- and that isn't the case.
Continue reading A salary cap in baseball?
Posted Jan 2nd 2009 9:27AM by Zac Bissonnette (RSS feed)
Filed under: Business of sports

After the New York Yankees signed the three biggest free agents on the market, Milwaukee Brewers owner Mark Attanasio
sent an email to Bloomberg calling for a salary cap: "At the rate the Yankees are going, I'm not sure anyone can compete with them. Frankly, the sport might need a salary cap." He added that "I paid $220 million for my team; now they get three players for $420 million."
Under a salary cap system, teams would be limited as far as how much they can spend on player salaries each year -- the idea is to allow smaller-market teams to be competitive.
But in an
interview with CNBC, Scott Boras -- the controversial super-agent who represents Mark Teixeira, Manny Ramirez and many others -- explained why he doesn't think baseball should have a salary cap. Of course it's a pretty self-serving argument but here's what he said:
"I'm not sure what a salary cap does other than it prevents choices."
Of course Scott Boras could sell a champion sailor to a guy in the desert, but he actually might be onto something with this one: The free agent frenzy of out of control spending adds a "Hot Stove" season to baseball that others sports lack. And for all the talk about big budget teams killing competitiveness, the two teams that made it to the World Series ranked 13th and 29th (second to last) on the list of
teams with the biggest budgets.Posted Oct 16th 2008 1:00PM by Jonathan Berr (RSS feed)
Filed under: Time Warner (TWX), News Corp'B' (NWS), Business of sports

The Boston Red Sox can take comfort in knowing that media tycoon Rupert Murdoch is in their corner tonight as they face potential elimination from the American League Championship Series at the hands of the Tampa Bay Rays. Whether that will help the Sox overcome a
3 games to 1 deficit is doubtful.
Murdoch, who probably prefers rugby or soccer to America's past time, is in a pickle with the World Series that will be broadcast over his Fox network.
News Corp. (NYSE:
NWS) shareholders, whose holdings plunged more than 60 percent this year, are probably gritting their teeth that the Philadelphia Phillies (my team) defeated ex-Red Sox slugger Manny Ramirez and the Los Angeles Dodgers to capture the National League championship. Ramirez is one of the game's best known and controversial personalities. Moreover, the Dodgers attract fans from all over the country including older folks who remember them when they were in Brooklyn.
The Red Sox nation are among the most passionate fans in baseball. I bet they are miffed that the ALCS has been relegated to TBS while the much inferior National League basked in the glow of network television. Furthermore. the Red Sox , one of the most storied franchises in sports, are on the verge of being eliminated by a team from Tampa Bay, which gave the world Hooters. Okay, that was Clearwater, but it's close enough.
Continue reading Rupert Murdoch is in a pickle with the World Series
Posted Sep 21st 2008 10:10AM by Joseph Lazzaro (RSS feed)
Filed under: Other issues, Business of sports
Are your stocks and other investments underperforming? Well, consider buying a piece of Yankee Stadium as an investment.
Yankee Stadium, the cathedral of baseball, and "The House That Ruth Built," closes today.
In 2009, the City of New York will auction-off seats, signs, lockers, and other valuable parts of Yankee Stadium and Shea Stadium, both of which are owned by the city and which will be replaced in April 2009 by two new stadiums, a new Yankee Stadium in The Bronx for the New York Yankees, and CitiField in Queens for the New York Mets.
Artifacts from both ballparks will have value, but Yankee Stadium's will far exceed most items from Shea Stadium, collectors say.
That's because, among sports venues, in human history Yankee Stadium ranks second only to the Roman Coliseum in cultural and social significance.
We know what occurred in the Coliseum: its activities symbolized life during humanity's descent. We also know what has taken place in Yankee Stadium, and the games played and events held there help tell the story of humanity's ascent.
Continue reading Investments slumping? Consider buying a piece of 'The House That Ruth Built'
Posted May 28th 2008 5:44PM by Jonathan Berr (RSS feed)
Filed under: Marketing and advertising, Walt Disney (DIS), News Corp'B' (NWS), Business of sports

Baseball is not always a perfect metaphor for life, but it is a good one for investing.
Good teams know how to find value where others may not see it. Spending gobs of money on expensive players does not always pan out and successful companies do the little things well. There is no better illustration of this than the current sad state of the New York Mets and New York Yankees.
Despite investing more money than the GDP of some small, developing countries on high-priced talent, the New York Mets and New York Yankees are being outperformed by teams from the vast baseball wasteland known as Florida. The pain being felt by New York sports fans pales in comparison to the anguish in the executive offices of
Walt Disney Co. (NYSE:
DIS)'s ESPN and
News Corp. (NYSE:
NWS)'s Fox Sports, which spent big bucks tor the rights to broadcast baseball games. I bet ESPN and Fox ad sales representatives would break out in a cold sweat at the thought of an all-Florida World Series.
What's ironic is that the people in Florida don't seem to like baseball. More than 80,000 people showed up to watch the football games of powerhouses
University of Florida and Florida State in 2006. Last year, the American League Rays attracted an average of 17,148 fans to their games and the NL Marlins drew 16,919, according to the
Baseball Almanac. That's roughly a third of the 52,739 who went to see the Yankees or the 47,579 who went to watch the Mets.
Continue reading Lessons for investors in the woes of the New York Yankees and Mets
Posted Dec 15th 2007 2:10PM by Tom Barlow (RSS feed)
Filed under: Deals, Business of sports
In 2001, Alex Rodriguez, perhaps the finest slugger to ever play the game, inked an unprecendented 10-year, $252 million contract to jump from the Seattle Mariners to the Texas Rangers. Three years later, when the Texas management regained its sanity and realized the ruinous terms of the deal, they dealt A-Rod to the only team with the money to support such a contract, the New York Yankees.
With A-Rod and another future Hall-of-Famer at shortstop, Derek Jeter, the Yankees had the foundation to return to its status as perennial World Series champion. Unfortunately for the club, it hasn't turned out that way. For A-Rod, however, things continue to improve.
His 2007 season was a monster; 54 home runs, 156 RBIs, slugging percentage of .645, American League MVP. Unfortunately, he continued what has become a maddening tendency to disappear in the playoffs, hitting like a bantamweight in the team's loss to the Cleveland Indians.
Such a wipeout might diminish most people's bargaining value, but A-Rod took an early-out option in his contract and went back out on the free agent market. After much bluster and posturing, the Yankees awarded him a new 10-year, $275 million contract. At 32, he should be set for the rest of his career, one in which he will almost certainly eclipse the home run record of Barry "better hitting through chemistry" Bonds.
When it comes to baseball contracts, in 2007 A-Rod hit one out of the park.
Be sure to check out more Money Winners of 2007.
Posted Nov 18th 2007 10:10AM by Zac Bissonnette (RSS feed)
Filed under: Rants and raves, Business of sports
Seeking advice on his contract negotiation with the New York Yankees, Alex Rodriguez went to the number one source for business wisdom, Warren Buffett, and a pair of Goldman Sachs executives.
After opting out of his contract at the urging of super-agent Scott Boras, Rodriguez found limited interest in his services at the price he was seeking. Now, he's back negotiating with the Yankees, after alienating the team badly by refusing to meet with them.
Buffett's advice to Rodriguez was this: If you want to stay in New York, go talk to the Yankees yourself and leave Boras out of it -- there's too much bad blood between him and the Yankees.
There are lot of athletes who could use Buffett's wisdom: Mike Lowell has professed his desire to stay in Boston, but may leave the team if he can secure a four-year deal from another team -- Boston is only offering him three. Buffett would probably tell him that it's silly to leave a great situation for more money when you're already rich. Mr. Lowell: Please stay in Boston. You had the best year of your career and the fans love you.
Buffett would probably tell Barry Bonds ... Well, Buffett would actually probably beat the crap out of Barry Bonds, because Warren Buffett is a person of integrity -- he doesn't like people who cheat and lie.
Full Disclosure: Zac Bissonnette is long the Boston Red Sox and has a large naked short position in the New York Yankees.
Posted Oct 30th 2007 3:34PM by Zac Bissonnette (RSS feed)
Filed under: Business of sports
Corporate governance experts will tell you that executives generally perform best when their interests are aligned with those of their shareholders -- a CEO who owns a big chunk of stock tends to be more concerned about the interests of investors. After all, he is one! But does the same idea apply to baseball players?
Alex Rodriguez's super agent Scott Boras is said to be looking for a 10-year, $300 million deal for the star, and The Wall Street Journal has an idea (subscription required) for a novel way for a team to come up with the cash:
That is an awful lot for any team without the Yankees' payroll to commit to. But what if, as with a Wall Street firm, a chunk of it came in the form of equity? Such risk-sharing might be attractive for some team owners, though the compensation might need to be deferred to comply with league rules...
It sounds like an interesting idea. It might encourage Rodriguez, who has developed a reputation for being enigmatic at time, to engage in PR activities and really add value to the team, on and off the field.
It's probably a long shot, but definitely interesting to think about.
Next Page >