<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Cablevision has the right assets for the digital age]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/cablevision-has-the-right-assets-for-the-digital-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/cablevision-has-the-right-assets-for-the-digital-age/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/cablevision-has-the-right-assets-for-the-digital-age/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><img border="1" align="right" vspace="4" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/09/cvc-cablevision-logo.jpg" alt="" />Much-maligned Cablevision Systems Corporation (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cablevision-systems-corporation/cvc/nys">CVC</a>) is getting its act together, which is one reason I'm reiterating my buy rating for the company share's, first recommended <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cablevision-systems-corporation/cvc/nys">on May 29, 2009</a> at a price of $19.03. If you bought CVC in May, you're up about 30%.<br /><br />Look for a 2-4% revenue increase for CVC in 2010, led by telecom subscriber increases, but weighed-down by below-trend cable TV subscriber growth.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/cablevision-has-the-right-assets-for-the-digital-age/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cablevision has the right assets for the digital age</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/cablevision-has-the-right-assets-for-the-digital-age/">Cablevision has the right assets for the digital age</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/cablevision-has-the-right-assets-for-the-digital-age/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19262382/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/cablevision-has-the-right-assets-for-the-digital-age/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cable tv</category><category>CableTv</category><category>cablevision</category><category>digital voice</category><category>DigitalVoice</category><category>madison square garden</category><category>MadisonSquareGarden</category><category>new york city</category><category>NewYorkCity</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rich still too richly compensated according to richest of them all]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/rich-still-too-richly-compensated-according-to-richest-of-them/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/rich-still-too-richly-compensated-according-to-richest-of-them/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/rich-still-too-richly-compensated-according-to-richest-of-them/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img width="200" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="146" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/billgates.jpg" alt="" />It's easy to save the world when you've already taken care of yourself. But, we rely on these mavericks -- the wealthy who realize they can make a difference -- to do what we cannot on our own. So, it comes as a relief that <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/BillGates/">Bill Gates</a>, founder of Microsoft (<a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) believes <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/executivecompensation/">executive compensation</a> is still too high. </p>
<div id="imageResults" style="display: block;"> </div>
<p>It's a murky topic, and some forms of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/regulation/">regulation</a>, Gates believes, won't help. In a discussion on philanthropy at the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/92ndStreetY/">92nd Street Y</a> in <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Manhattan/">Manhattan</a>, where many of the people Gates criticized send their kids for early education, the former CEO and still rich guy cites the $1 million executive <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/salarycap/">salary cap</a> required by law in 1993 as a big mistake. While compensation has to be controlled,<a target="_blank" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSTRE5AB0KL20091112"> he believes this measure backfired and thinks that other, similar efforts are doomed to fail now</a>. </p>
<p><br /></p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/rich-still-too-richly-compensated-according-to-richest-of-them/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Rich still too richly compensated according to richest of them all</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/rich-still-too-richly-compensated-according-to-richest-of-them/">Rich still too richly compensated according to richest of them all</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSTRE5AB0KL20091112>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/rich-still-too-richly-compensated-according-to-richest-of-them/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19234964/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/12/rich-still-too-richly-compensated-according-to-richest-of-them/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>92nd st y</category><category>92ndStY</category><category>bill gates</category><category>BillGates</category><category>compensation</category><category>compensation caps</category><category>CompensationCaps</category><category>executive compensation</category><category>executive pay</category><category>executive salary</category><category>ExecutiveCompensation</category><category>ExecutivePay</category><category>ExecutiveSalary</category><category>gates</category><category>inthenews</category><category>manhattan</category><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft msft</category><category>MicrosoftMsft</category><category>msft</category><category>new york</category><category>new york city</category><category>new york new york</category><category>NewYork</category><category>NewYorkCity</category><category>NewYorkNewYork</category><category>philanthropy</category><category>regulation</category><category>regulations</category><category>salary cap</category><category>SalaryCap</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Pricey Manhattan homes are moving again]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/pricey-manhattan-homes-are-moving-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/pricey-manhattan-homes-are-moving-again/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/pricey-manhattan-homes-are-moving-again/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/09/newyork_empire.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />A year ago, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Manhattan/">Manhattan</a> homeowners lived within the firm grasp of the worst recession in 70 years. <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33129083/ns/business/" target="_blank">A skyrocketing real estate market seemed ready to come back to Earth</a>, as carnage in the financial services industry - which spread to just about every other business - decimated incomes and net worths throughout the city. </p>
<p>From the second quarter to the third, this year, the sale of co-ops and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/apartments/">apartments</a> spiked between 46% and 69% according to several reports from the real estate business. Sales are still lower than last year, but the recovery has been nothing short of amazing (to the chagrin of those of us who had dreams of one day moving up from the rental class). </p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/PrudentialDouglasElliman/">Prudential Douglas Elliman</a> reported a price increase of almost 2% from the second quarter, though the median was down 8% to 18% from last year - to the $760,000 to $850,000 range. Jonathan Miller, president and CEO of Miller Samuel Inc., a <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/realestate/">real estate</a> appraisal and consulting firm, calls this good news, but cautions that it doesn't mean we're at the bottom. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/pricey-manhattan-homes-are-moving-again/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Pricey Manhattan homes are moving again</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/pricey-manhattan-homes-are-moving-again/">Pricey Manhattan homes are moving again</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 05 Oct 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33129083/ns/business/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/pricey-manhattan-homes-are-moving-again/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19183705/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/pricey-manhattan-homes-are-moving-again/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apartment</category><category>apartments</category><category>inthenews</category><category>manhattan</category><category>manhattan real estate</category><category>ManhattanRealEstate</category><category>national association of realtors</category><category>NationalAssociationOfRealtors</category><category>new york</category><category>new york city</category><category>new york city real estate</category><category>new york real estate</category><category>NewYork</category><category>NewYorkCity</category><category>NewYorkCityRealEstate</category><category>NewYorkRealEstate</category><category>prudential douglas elliman</category><category>PrudentialDouglasElliman</category><category>real estate</category><category>RealEstate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Commercial real estate vacancies surge above 12% in Manhattan]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/17/commercial-real-estate-vacancies-surge-above-12-in-manhattan/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/17/commercial-real-estate-vacancies-surge-above-12-in-manhattan/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/17/commercial-real-estate-vacancies-surge-above-12-in-manhattan/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/09/newyork_empire.jpg" />This is not an abstraction: buildings large and small are <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aCUtsLdJ9k0M">showing gaping vacancies</a>. Storefronts are empty. Entire buildings sit waiting to be occupied. In Manhattan, retail vacancies have reached their highest rates since 2001. For the second quarter of this year, vacancies hit the absurd height of 12.4%, thanks to unemployment trends that won't quit and consumers reluctant to pry open their wallets. </p>
<p>Retailers are being hit <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/08/apartment-vacancies-spiked-in-q2-in-u-s/">just like the residential market</a>. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/17/commercial-real-estate-vacancies-surge-above-12-in-manhattan/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Commercial real estate vacancies surge above 12% in Manhattan</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/17/commercial-real-estate-vacancies-surge-above-12-in-manhattan/">Commercial real estate vacancies surge above 12% in Manhattan</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aCUtsLdJ9k0M>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/17/commercial-real-estate-vacancies-surge-above-12-in-manhattan/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19101826/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/17/commercial-real-estate-vacancies-surge-above-12-in-manhattan/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barnes and noble</category><category>barnes noble</category><category>BarnesAndNoble</category><category>BarnesNoble</category><category>circuit city</category><category>CircuitCity</category><category>commercial real estate</category><category>commercial rents</category><category>CommercialRealEstate</category><category>CommercialRents</category><category>inthenews</category><category>manhattan</category><category>new york</category><category>new york city</category><category>NewYork</category><category>NewYorkCity</category><category>rent</category><category>rental market</category><category>RentalMarket</category><category>rentals</category><category>soho</category><category>times square</category><category>TimesSquare</category><category>upper east side</category><category>upper west side</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apartment vacancies spiked in Q2 in U.S.]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/08/apartment-vacancies-spiked-in-q2-in-u-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/08/apartment-vacancies-spiked-in-q2-in-u-s/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/08/apartment-vacancies-spiked-in-q2-in-u-s/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/09/newyork_empire.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Apartment/">Apartment</a> vacancies in the United States hit their <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601213&amp;sid=a5YNzreTGxLw">highest level in 22 years in the second quarter of 2009</a>. Job losses are to blame, according to <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601213&amp;sid=a5YNzreTGxLw">Bloomberg</a>, as tenant demand falls when people don't have any income. Vacancies rose to 7.5% from 6.1% year-over-year, according to Reis Inc. But this still doesn't reach the 1987 level of 7.6%. In June, the U.S. unemployment rate hit a 26-year high, with payrolls dropping faster than expectations.</p>
<p>Conventional wisdom has it that potential homebuyers turn into renters when the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/jobmarket/">job market</a> softens. The rental pool is shrinking, however, leading to the high rate of apartment vacancies as landlords struggle to fill units. Asking rents for apartments fell 0.6% last quarter (for the second in a row), according to Reis, the largest fall since the company started to track this measure in 1999. Overall, asking rents (including other types of residences) were off 0.7% year-over-year, down to an average of $1,040 a month.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/08/apartment-vacancies-spiked-in-q2-in-u-s/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Apartment vacancies spiked in Q2 in U.S.</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/08/apartment-vacancies-spiked-in-q2-in-u-s/">Apartment vacancies spiked in Q2 in U.S.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601213&amp;sid=a5YNzreTGxLw>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/08/apartment-vacancies-spiked-in-q2-in-u-s/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19090242/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/08/apartment-vacancies-spiked-in-q2-in-u-s/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apartments</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job market</category><category>JobMarket</category><category>layoffs</category><category>new york city</category><category>NewYorkCity</category><category>real estate</category><category>RealEstate</category><category>recession</category><category>rental market</category><category>RentalMarket</category><category>rentals</category><category>vacancies</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Where are they now:  Former Dell 'dude' working food service]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/08/where-are-they-now-former-dell-dude-working-food-service/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/08/where-are-they-now-former-dell-dude-working-food-service/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/08/where-are-they-now-former-dell-dude-working-food-service/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><p><img width="180" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="140" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/dell-dude1.jpg" alt="" />I've had a couple of brushes with fame in my day, and my track record isn't the greatest. I met River Phoenix in April 1991, about 2 1/2 years before his drug-related death at the age of 23 (I love the people who ask me if I got to meet him "while he was still alive." Ummm.) I also knew Ben Curtis (the spokesman, not the golfer). As an elementary-school-age boy, the once-and-future face of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">Dell</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">DELL</a>) was a peripheral friend of my brother and the son of my French teacher. </p>
<p>As I said, my celebrity encounters haven't enjoyed particular longevity. While Curtis isn't overdosing outside the Viper Room, he has been part of the <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/food/2007/11/dell_dude_now_tequila_dude_at.html">wait staff</a> at Tortilla Flats, a Manhattan bar at Washington and 12th, for the past 18 months. Last week, for Halloween, he dressed up as his former alter-ego, Steve the s<span style="font-size: 9pt; line-height: 115%;" arial="" sans-serif="" mso-fareast-font-family:="" mso-fareast-theme-font:="" mso-ansi-language:="" mso-fareast-language:="" mso-bidi-language:="" ar-sa="">quirrelly</span> "Dude, you're getting a Dell" kid. He says he gets recognized every day, but appreciated a job at which he can always be himself. And if you ask nicely, he may just repeat his famous catchphrase while he delivers your margarita. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/08/where-are-they-now-former-dell-dude-working-food-service/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Where are they now:  Former Dell 'dude' working food service</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/08/where-are-they-now-former-dell-dude-working-food-service/">Where are they now:  Former Dell 'dude' working food service</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 08 Nov 2007 17:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://nymag.com/daily/food/2007/11/dell_dude_now_tequila_dude_at.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/08/where-are-they-now-former-dell-dude-working-food-service/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1024699/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/08/where-are-they-now-former-dell-dude-working-food-service/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ben Curtis</category><category>BenCurtis</category><category>catchphrases</category><category>celebrity</category><category>Dell</category><category>New York City</category><category>NewYorkCity</category><category>NYC</category><category>Restaurants</category><category>Tortilla flats</category><category>TortillaFlats</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 17:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Option update: Goldman (GS), Morgan (MS), Bear (BSC) &amp; Lehman (LEH) EPS, Risk Outlook]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/11/option-update-goldman-gs-morganms-bear-bsc-and-lehman-leh-e/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/11/option-update-goldman-gs-morganms-bear-bsc-and-lehman-leh-e/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/11/option-update-goldman-gs-morganms-bear-bsc-and-lehman-leh-e/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/leh/" rel="tag">Lehman Br Holdings (LEH)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bsc/" rel="tag">Bear Stearns Cos (BSC)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/goldman-sachs-grp-com-usd0-01/gs/nys"><img align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" /><strong>Goldman Sachs</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/goldman-sachs-grp-com-usd0-01/gs/nys">GS</a>) volatility Elevated into EPS, Risk Exposure &amp; Outlook. GS is expected to report EPS on 9/20. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wachovia-corp-new-com-usd3-333-1-3/wb/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Wachovia Corp.</a>(NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wachovia-corp-new-com-usd3-333-1-3/wb/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">WB</a>) say's "Lack of mortgage and Chinese exposure distinguish GS." GS September option implied volatility is at 50; October is at 45; above its 26-week average of 35 according to Track Data, suggesting larger risk. </p>
<p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley-com-stk-usd0-01/ms/nys">Morgan Stanley</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley-com-stk-usd0-01/ms/nys">MS</a>) MS is expected to report EPS on 9/19. MS September option implied volatility is at 48; October is at 41; above its 26-week average of 33 according to Track Data, suggesting larger risk.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-bear-stearns-companies-inc/bsc/nys">Bear Stearns</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-bear-stearns-companies-inc/bsc/nys">BSC</a>) is expected to report EPS on 9/20. Aquarian Investments holds a 6.97% stake in BSC for investment purposes. BSC Chairman &amp; CEO James Cayne is 72. BSC Chairman of Executive committee Alan Greenberg is 79. WB say's BSC "shares are currently 1.2x book value compared to its historical average of 1.6x." BSC September option implied volatility is at 71; October is at 63; is above its 26-week average of 43 according to Track Data, suggesting large price movement. </p>
<p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lehman-bros-hldgs-com-usd0-10/leh/nys">Lehman Brothers</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lehman-bros-hldgs-com-usd0-10/leh/nys">LEH</a>) is expected to report 3rd quarter EPS on 9/18. WCHV say's LEH's "Q3 started strong but ended real weak." LEH September option implied volatility is at 76; October is at 62; above its 26-week average of 40 according to Track Data, suggesting larger price risk.</p>
<p><br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/11/option-update-goldman-gs-morganms-bear-bsc-and-lehman-leh-e/">Option update: Goldman (GS), Morgan (MS), Bear (BSC) &amp; Lehman (LEH) EPS, Risk Outlook</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 11 Sep 2007 11:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/11/option-update-goldman-gs-morganms-bear-bsc-and-lehman-leh-e/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/986490/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/11/option-update-goldman-gs-morganms-bear-bsc-and-lehman-leh-e/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Aquarian Investments</category><category>AquarianInvestments</category><category>bankers</category><category>Bear Stearns</category><category>BearStearns</category><category>BSC</category><category>capital</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>GS</category><category>hedge fund</category><category>HedgeFund</category><category>Investment banking</category><category>InvestmentBanking</category><category>James Cayne</category><category>JamesCayne</category><category>John Mach</category><category>JohnMach</category><category>Lehan Brothers:LEH</category><category>LehanBrothers:leh</category><category>money</category><category>Morhan Stanley</category><category>MorhanStanley</category><category>MS</category><category>Mutual funds</category><category>MutualFunds</category><category>New York City</category><category>NewYorkCity</category><category>volatility Elevated</category><category>VolatilityElevated</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 11:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Option update: Coal producers active]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/06/option-update-coal-producer-options-active/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/06/option-update-coal-producer-options-active/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/06/option-update-coal-producer-options-active/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/peabody-energy-corporation/btu/nys"><img align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" /><strong>Peabody Energy Corp.</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/peabody-energy-corporation/btu/nys">BTU</a>) -- volume and volatility increases on renewed buyout chatter. BTU, the world's largest private-sector coal company, with 2006 sales of 248 million tons and $5.3 billion in revenues, is recently up $2.30 to $45.60 on unconfirmed and renewed buyout chatter. BTU's CEO Greg Boyce presented at the Lehman Brothers CEO Energy/Power Conference in New York City today. BTU call option volume of 8,070 contracts compares to put volume of 9,128 contracts. BTU September option implied volatility of 39 is above its 26-week average of 36 according to Track Data, suggesting larger price risks.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/massey-energy-company/mee/nys">Massey Energy Corp.</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/massey-energy-company/mee/nys">MEE</a>) -- implied volatility of 52 is above the 26-week average of 45. MEE, the fourth largest coal company in the U.S. based on produced coal revenue, is recently up $1.44 to $22.24. MEE's Chairman &amp; CEO Don Blankenship will present at the Lehman Brothers CEO Energy/Power Conference in New York City this afternoon.<br />MEE October option implied volatility of 52 is above its 26-week average of 45 according to Track Data, suggesting larger price fluctuations.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/consol-energy-incorporated/cnx/nys">Consol Energy Inc.</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/consol-energy-incorporated/cnx/nys">CNX</a>) -- volatility Flat as CNX rallies on idling of mine. CNX is recently up $1.31 to $41.24. CNX announced it plans to idle its Mine 84 in Northern Appalachia because of the mine's inability to meet its targeted rate of return. Stifel Nicolaus has a Buy rating and $58 price target on CNX. STFL says, "we continue to favor CNX shares over most of its coal industry peers due to its strong coal reserve base, its favorable market position as the dominant Northern Appalachian coal miner, and its direct exposure to natural gas markets." CNX call option volume of 3,348 contracts compares to put volume of 386 contracts. CNX October option implied volatility of 41 is near its 26-week average according to Track Data, suggesting non-directional price risks.</p>
<p><em>Daily options Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/06/option-update-coal-producer-options-active/">Option update: Coal producers active</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 06 Sep 2007 14:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/06/option-update-coal-producer-options-active/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/982872/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/06/option-update-coal-producer-options-active/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>coal</category><category>coal industry</category><category>CoalIndustry</category><category>Don Blankenship</category><category>DonBlankenship</category><category>energy</category><category>Energy/Power Conference</category><category>Energy/powerConference</category><category>Greg Boyce</category><category>GregBoyce</category><category>implied volatility</category><category>ImpliedVolatility</category><category>Lehman Brothers</category><category>LehmanBrothers</category><category>New York City</category><category>NewYorkCity</category><category>Northern Appalachia</category><category>NorthernAppalachia</category><category>Peabody Energy</category><category>PeabodyEnergy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 14:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[A little relief at the pump]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/12/a-little-relief-at-the-pump/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/12/a-little-relief-at-the-pump/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/12/a-little-relief-at-the-pump/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvx/" rel="tag">Chevron Corp (CVX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cop/" rel="tag">ConocoPhillips (COP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bp/" rel="tag">BP p.l.c. ADS (BP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/gaspump061207.jpg" />For those of you who just can't stand the thought of running out and filling up your car with gasoline, I have a little bit of good news: <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/gas-prices-fall-for-third-straight-week/20070612063609990001?cid=403">gasoline prices fell</a> again last week. According to the Energy Information Administration, the national average fell by a little over 8 cents a gallon last week.<br /><br />This marks the third week in a row that prices have fallen, lowering the national average to $3.08 for a gallon of regular unleaded. While it is encouraging to see prices falling to a four-week low, prices are still up 91 cents from the start of the year. <br /><br />U.S. refinery production has been the root of the problem, and although America's refineries are still running at sub 90% capacity, gasoline prices have been slightly offset by increased motor fuel imports. Analysts are expecting that more refineries will be coming back online during the remainder of this month, and if we continue to see above average fuel imports, then gasoline prices should continue to retreat. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/12/a-little-relief-at-the-pump/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>A little relief at the pump</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/12/a-little-relief-at-the-pump/">A little relief at the pump</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/gas-prices-fall-for-third-straight-week/20070612063609990001?cid=403>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/12/a-little-relief-at-the-pump/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/916329/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/12/a-little-relief-at-the-pump/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>denver</category><category>Energy Information Administration</category><category>EnergyInformationAdministration</category><category>gasoline</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>GasolinePrices</category><category>houston</category><category>los angeles</category><category>LosAngeles</category><category>miami</category><category>new york city</category><category>NewYorkCity</category><category>NYC</category><category>oil</category><category>pumps</category><category>refineries</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Con Edison posts good 1Q earnings]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/22/con-edison-posts-good-1q-earnings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/22/con-edison-posts-good-1q-earnings/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/22/con-edison-posts-good-1q-earnings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ed/" rel="tag">Consolidated Edison (ED)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/consolidated-edison-inc/ed/nys">Consolidated Edison</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/consolidated-edison-inc/ed/nys">ED</a>) reported <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/con-edison-inc-reports-2007-first/n20070510092509990009">good first quarter earnings</a> of $256 million, $0.99 EPS, up 41% from 1Q 2006 earnings of $181 million, or $0.74 per share. A big enough increase to make even a jaded in-bound strap hanger smile. Con Edison posted these numbers despite a $10 million loss, $0.04 per share, in complicated net mark-to-market valuations. This amount is only one-third as big as net mark to market losses of $31 million in 1Q 2006. Con Edison management states the earnings increase is a result of sales growth, a stretch of colder than normal temperatures during the early part of 1Q as well as a utility rate hike for NYC. </p>
<p>Con Edison transmits electricity, gas and even steam, and all three sectors recorded volume increases during 1Q 2007, electricity up 2.6%, gas up 7.4% and steam up 0.5%. Con Edison will continue its expansion and updating schema in both NYC and several surrounding boroughs during FY 2007 and beyond, and recently began the process of issuing an additional 11 million shares at an average price of $50.60 to fund these ambitious programs. The stock recently closed at $50.95, and its P/E ratio of 15.9 is less than the industry average of 17.10. Con Edison has annual revenues in excess of $12 billion, with assets valued at over $27 billion. It is one of the largest investor-owned energy companies in the US.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/22/con-edison-posts-good-1q-earnings/">Con Edison posts good 1Q earnings</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 22 May 2007 14:52:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/con-edison-inc-reports-2007-first/n20070510092509990009>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/22/con-edison-posts-good-1q-earnings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/901155/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/22/con-edison-posts-good-1q-earnings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Con Edison</category><category>ConEdison</category><category>Consolidated Edison</category><category>ConsolidatedEdison</category><category>ed</category><category>eletrical utilites</category><category>EletricalUtilites</category><category>New York City</category><category>NewYorkCity</category><category>NYC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Victoria Erhart]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 14:52:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wal-Mart CEO hammers New York]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/28/wal-mart-ceo-hammers-new-york/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/28/wal-mart-ceo-hammers-new-york/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/28/wal-mart-ceo-hammers-new-york/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a></p><p><img width="199" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="208" align="right" style="width: 197px; height: 233px;" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/03/idbb_04_img0258.jpg" />The <em>New York Times</em> printed <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/28/business/28retail.html?ref=business">some really bizarre comments</a> from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">Wal-Mart Stores Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WMT</a>) CEO Lee Scott yesterday in which he appeared to be venting about the company's struggles in opening stores in New York City. Here are a few of his comments:</p>
<ul>
    <li>"I don't care if we are ever here." </li>
    <li>"I don't think it's worth the effort." </li>
    <li>"It's too hard to make money here." </li>
    <li>Referring to the company's struggles in New York, Chicago, and Los Angeles: "The glue is the unions." </li>
    <li>"You have people who are just better than us and don't want a Wal-Mart in their community." </li>
</ul>
<p>What's stunning about Lee's comments is his candor and arrogance, and it's difficult to imagine what he's hoping to accomplish here. They provide ample ammo for the anti-Big Box brigade, and the responses have already started to come. Ed Ott, executive director of the New York City Central Labor Council said, "We don't care if they're never here. We don't miss them. We have great supermarkets and great retail outlets in New York. We don't need Wal-Mart." Lee Scott has struggled to win the battle for the hearts and minds of consumers and the media and the company's stock price has also lagged during his tenure.</p>
<p>His petulant attacks on the city of New York are unlikely to please the company's Board of Directors and could add to the calls for his resignation.</p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/28/wal-mart-ceo-hammers-new-york/">Wal-Mart CEO hammers New York</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 28 Mar 2007 09:43:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/28/business/28retail.html?ref=business>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/28/wal-mart-ceo-hammers-new-york/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/861894/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/28/wal-mart-ceo-hammers-new-york/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Lee Scott</category><category>LeeScott</category><category>New York</category><category>new york city</category><category>NewYork</category><category>NewYorkCity</category><category>wal-mart</category><category>wmt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 09:43:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New York City: A financial rust belt?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/22/new-york-city-a-financial-rust-belt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/22/new-york-city-a-financial-rust-belt/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/22/new-york-city-a-financial-rust-belt/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/01/mckinsey.bmp" alt="" /></p>
<p>It's been giddy times on Wall Street. Might this be the prelude to a big fall?</p>
<p>That's the take from a recent <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/22/business/22competitive.html?dlbk">report</a> from Senator Charles E. Schumer and Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg. The research is based on the work of the management consulting firm McKinsey, which conducted 50 extensive interviews of business leaders. </p>
<p>Basically, unless certain changes are made, NY may lose anywhere from 4% to 7% of its global share of the financial services market within the next five years.</p>
<p>It should be no surprise, since among other problems the US has too much litigation. </p>
<p>What's more, the new regulations of Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) make it unfavorable for companies to go public in the US. As a result, overseas markets look more attractive.</p>
<p>The good news is that these are things that can be fixed. For example, it looks like the SEC is already making moves to lessen the impact of SOX.<br /><br />But as usual, such issues are complex and can be crowded out by other political issues -- after all, how many Americans really know what SOX is? So it is likely to take a while for change to take place. </p>
<p>In the meantime, other major overseas financial centers will, of course, not wait.</p>
<p><em>Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including the Complete M&amp;A Handbook and the EDGAR-Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/22/new-york-city-a-financial-rust-belt/">New York City: A financial rust belt?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/22/business/22competitive.html?_r=1&amp;dlbk&amp;oref=slogin>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/22/new-york-city-a-financial-rust-belt/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/740316/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/22/new-york-city-a-financial-rust-belt/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Charles Schumer</category><category>CharlesSchumer</category><category>New York City</category><category>NewYorkCity</category><category>Sarbanes-Oxley</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Would you rather make $200K in NY, or $100K in Cleveland?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/15/would-you-rather-make-200k-in-ny-or-100k-in-cleveland/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/15/would-you-rather-make-200k-in-ny-or-100k-in-cleveland/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/15/would-you-rather-make-200k-in-ny-or-100k-in-cleveland/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a></p><p><img id="vimage_1" alt="new york city" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/09/newyork_empire.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Think before you answer.</p>
<p>What would a $200,000 salary get you in New York, and what in Cleveland? Well, let's strip it down: </p>
<ul>
    <li>
    <div>What would be your purchasing power after accounting for the cost of living? New York's cost of living, for example, is double the national average.</div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div>What about effective tax rates? The tax rate in New York is 25.4% for the $200K salary vs. a tax rate of 20.4% in Cleveland for the $100K salary.</div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div>Different inflation rates? May annual inflation rate in New York metropolitan area was 4.8%, in Cleveland, the rate was 3%.</div>
    </li>
</ul>
<p>All these should be considered before deciding. So, have you changed your answer?</p>
<p>Let's start by saying that if you have that choice (of making a six figure salary), then congratulations are in order. You are part of the 5% of Americans who do (according to 2004 census reports). But the real question is - where do you live?</p>
<p><a href="http://money.cnn.com/2006/07/13/pf/six_fig_farthest/index.htm?postversion=2006071410"><em>CNNMoney.com</em></a> used data from 6FigureJobs.com and TheLadders.com to figure out the equivalent of $100,000 after adjusting for the cost of living in the top cities that have the largest numbers of six figures jobs listings. In New York, a $100,000 equivalent salary would require a salary of over $205,000, in Boston more than $137,000, about $101,000 in Cleveland and less than $89,000 in Houston.</p>
<p>So while many six figure jobs are indeed offered in higher cost of living areas, there are still many cities such as Chicago, Atlanta, Seattle, Cleveland and Denver as well as a few others that also have relatively high numbers of six figures jobs to offer. And as if that isn't enough to convince you, sometimes, just to attract talent, companies in those "lesser" cities would offer the same high salaries as in, say, New York.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/15/would-you-rather-make-200k-in-ny-or-100k-in-cleveland/">Would you rather make $200K in NY, or $100K in Cleveland?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 15 Sep 2006 13:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2006/07/13/pf/six_fig_farthest/index.htm?postversion=2006071410>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/15/would-you-rather-make-200k-in-ny-or-100k-in-cleveland/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/669612/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/15/would-you-rather-make-200k-in-ny-or-100k-in-cleveland/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cleveland</category><category>cleveland ohio</category><category>ClevelandOhio</category><category>comparison</category><category>earning power</category><category>earning power by city</category><category>EarningPower</category><category>EarningPowerByCity</category><category>inflation</category><category>inflation rates</category><category>inflation rates by city</category><category>InflationRates</category><category>InflationRatesByCity</category><category>job</category><category>jobs</category><category>manhattan</category><category>new york</category><category>new york city</category><category>NewYork</category><category>NewYorkCity</category><category>ohio</category><category>salaries</category><category>salary</category><category>salary, salaries, jobs, job, wage, earning power, wage power, wa</category><category>u.s. inflation rates</category><category>U.s.InflationRates</category><category>wage</category><category>wage comparison</category><category>wage power</category><category>WageComparison</category><category>WagePower</category><category>what would you do?</category><category>WhatWouldYouDo?</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 13:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dick Parsons for NY mayor -- would you vote for him?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/15/dick-parsons-for-ny-mayor-would-you-vote-for-him/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/15/dick-parsons-for-ny-mayor-would-you-vote-for-him/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/15/dick-parsons-for-ny-mayor-would-you-vote-for-him/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p>Dick Parsons for New York City mayor? A few weeks ago, I <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/25/should-dick-parsons-be-fired-or-steve-ballmer-or-jeff-immelt-o/">picked out an interesting tidbit in a story on why Parsons should be fired</a>: Gramercy Capital Management's Joan Lappin dribbled the tantalizing rumor that the Time Warner CEO was considering a run for mayor when Michael Bloomberg's term is up in 2009.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nymag.com/news/intelligencer/19141/index.html">Today's <em>New York Magazine</em> says</a> "it's all but official." Parsons will run, with some insiders even saying he'll hand over the CEO position to Bewkes (Lappin said this, too) before his current contract ends in 2008. Naturally Parsons has said he'll fulfill his contract, but not opined on the mayoral run.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?dist=newsfinder&amp;siteid=google&amp;guid=%7B40B8C4A4-5587-49FE-AF63-00285A070F73%7D&amp;keyword=">Frank Barnako of MarketWatch says this must be why Carl Icahn</a> is buying up shares of Time Warner, while <a href="http://www.dealbreaker.com/2006/08/parsons_aiming_for_city_hall.html">DealBreaker.com says Parsons entrance</a> into the race "is not entirely unwelcome" and hints that the I-banking elite might vote for him. Would you?</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/15/dick-parsons-for-ny-mayor-would-you-vote-for-him/">Dick Parsons for NY mayor -- would you vote for him?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 15 Aug 2006 06:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/15/dick-parsons-for-ny-mayor-would-you-vote-for-him/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/654637/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/15/dick-parsons-for-ny-mayor-would-you-vote-for-him/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dick</category><category>dick parsons</category><category>DickParsons</category><category>fire dick parsons</category><category>FireDickParsons</category><category>mayor</category><category>mayor of new york</category><category>MayorOfNewYork</category><category>new york</category><category>new york city</category><category>new york city mayor</category><category>NewYork</category><category>NewYorkCity</category><category>NewYorkCityMayor</category><category>ny</category><category>ny mayor</category><category>nyc</category><category>nyc mayor</category><category>NycMayor</category><category>NyMayor</category><category>parsons</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>twx</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 06:32:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
