Madoff, airlines, Wall Street: We don't need no stinkin' regulation!

Bruce Watson — Wed, 24 Dec 2008 16:30:00 EST

As the sordid tale of Bernard Madoff continues to unspool, it has become increasingly clear that somebody -- in fact, a lot of somebodies -- were asleep at the switch. Beyond the standard warning signs, like Madoff's incredible secrecy, his surprisingly consistent rate of return, and the clubby nature of his selling staff, there were far more obvious portents. For example, Madoff's chief compliance officer was his brother Peter, and one of the compliance attorneys was his niece. For that matter, the fact that Harry Markopolos, a Boston accountant, has been urging the SEC to investigate Madoff for the last nine years should have been a hint. The same, of course, goes for the 2006 SEC investigation that found violations, but didn't feel obliged to take any substantive action.

As the SEC attempts to assign blame in finest Three Stooges form, it's worth noting that this is hardly the first time that a lack of serious governmental regulation has reared its ugly head this year. At the moment, mobs are currently clamoring for Dick Fuld's head, with a healthy side order of Hank Greenberg, John Thain, John Mack, Lloyd Blankfein, Jimmy Cain, and pretty much everyone who works in New York's financial district. The general perspective seems to be that these men engaged in business practices that ran the gamut from risky to actionable and now should be forced to pay for the economy that they have ruined.

Continue reading Madoff, airlines, Wall Street: We don't need no stinkin' regulation!

Madoff, airlines, Wall Street: We don't need no stinkin' regulation! originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Wed, 24 Dec 2008 16:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Is Lazard's Bruce Wasserstein one of Wall Street's biggest losers?

Peter Cohan — Fri, 01 Feb 2008 13:55:00 EST

Filed under: Goldman Sachs Group (GS), Bear Stearns Cos (BSC)

Bruce Wasserstein's New York Magazine published a list of Wall Street titans who have seen their personal net worth decline in the last year. One name was conspicuously absent from that list: Bruce Wasserstein, who would rank second on the list of biggest losers if he not decided to exclude himself from his own publication. This type of omission has a proud history, as I have never seen Steve Forbes's name on his magazine's rich list.

Nevertheless, here are the top three biggest losers when Wasserstein's name is added accompanied by the amount they have lost:

The Bear Stearns Companies (NYSE: BSC) former CEO James Cayne saw his net worth plummet $467 million
Lazard Ltd.'s (NYSE: LAZ) CEO Bruce Wasserstein's net worth has fallen fallen $260 million. (This is calculated by multiplying Wasserstein's 11,394,504 shares by Lazard's stock tumble -- from its May 2007 high of $56.90 to January 24, 2008's $34.09); and
The Goldman Sachs Group's (NYSE: GS) CEO Lloyd Blankfein has suffered a $100 million decline.

It's nice to own the means of production over at New York Magazine -- and that ownership clearly influences what it chooses not to publish.

Peter Cohan is President of Peter S. Cohan & Associates. He also teaches management at Babson College and edits The Cohan Letter. He has no financial interest in the securities mentioned.

Is Lazard's Bruce Wasserstein one of Wall Street's biggest losers? originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Fri, 01 Feb 2008 13:55:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments