<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Retailers Lagging in Social Media Rush]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/12/retailers-lagging-in-social-media-rush/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/12/retailers-lagging-in-social-media-rush/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/12/retailers-lagging-in-social-media-rush/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/robeputer240.jpg"  alt="" />You'd think retailers would flock to any place where they could find 400 million people. With the sixth anniversary of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Facebook/">Facebook</a> closing in, its robust user base still hasn't opened the eyes of many <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/retailers/">retailers</a>. <br />
<br />
Despite all the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/BlackFriday/">Black Friday</a> social media engagement this year, a substantial 75% of the top 100 online retailers don't have a formal presence on Facebook, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=122085">according to a study by ForeSee Results</a>. Another 25% haven't even hit 10,000 fans.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/12/retailers-lagging-in-social-media-rush/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Retailers Lagging in Social Media Rush</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/12/retailers-lagging-in-social-media-rush/">Retailers Lagging in Social Media Rush</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 12 Feb 2010 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=122085>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/12/retailers-lagging-in-social-media-rush/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19355735/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/12/retailers-lagging-in-social-media-rush/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Black Friday</category><category>facebook</category><category>flickr</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>linkedin</category><category>myspace</category><category>news corp</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>NWS</category><category>retail</category><category>retailer</category><category>retailers</category><category>social media</category><category>social networking</category><category>SocialMedia</category><category>SocialNetworking</category><category>twitter</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><category>youtube</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is the Free Ride Over at Hulu?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/is-the-free-ride-over-at-hulu/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/is-the-free-ride-over-at-hulu/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/is-the-free-ride-over-at-hulu/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/videos/" rel="tag">Videos</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/hulu-logo-240.jpg" alt="" />Ahhh, Hulu. That wonderful destination where I can re-acquaint myself with my favorite Justin-Timberlake-on-SNL moments, catch up on episodes of <em>Greek</em>, and search for those old <em>Silver Spoons </em>clips I remember so fondly. The two-year-old website is a joint venture between Walt Disney's (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) ABC Network, General Electric's (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) NBC Universal division, and News Corp.'s (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">NWS</a>) FOX Entertainment Group, and is partially funded by Providence Equity Partners.</p>
<p>But just as online news readers may <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/20/its-official-your-online-new-york-times-will-come-at-a-price/">soon be charged</a> to access <em>The New York Times </em>online, we may have to open our wallets for certain corners of the Hulu universe (they will likely still let me watch <em>Silver Spoons </em>for free).</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/is-the-free-ride-over-at-hulu/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is the Free Ride Over at Hulu?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/is-the-free-ride-over-at-hulu/">Is the Free Ride Over at Hulu?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/redeye/2010/01/et-tu-hulu-but-but-30-rock-was-always-free.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/is-the-free-ride-over-at-hulu/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19340010/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/is-the-free-ride-over-at-hulu/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>30 rock</category><category>featured</category><category>FOX</category><category>General Electric</category><category>hulu</category><category>inthenews</category><category>NBC</category><category>News Corp</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>Walt Disney</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Most News Outlets Are Repetitive, New York Times Repeats]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/11/most-news-outlets-are-repetitive-new-york-times-repeats/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/11/most-news-outlets-are-repetitive-new-york-times-repeats/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/11/most-news-outlets-are-repetitive-new-york-times-repeats/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gci/" rel="tag">Gannett Co (GCI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/03/scaredpaper200.jpg" alt="" />The <em>New York Times</em> (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys" target="_blank">NYT</a>) reports today that <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/11/business/media/11baltimore.html?ref=business" target="_blank">newspapers dominate the news creation business</a>. </p>
<p> <span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/business_finance/Most_News_Outlets_Are_Repetitive_New_York_Times_Repeats'; </script> <script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>  This is an interesting twist -- instead of touting readers or paid circulation or ads or total revenue, it's talking about production. It's almost as if Ford (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys" target="_blank">F</a>) were to announce: "We make more cars than anyone else." Who the hell cares if they sell any, right? What's important is production, not sales! For the <em>Times</em>, and print media in general, it feels like yet another attempt to justify its existence and "prove" that it is more valuable than the more cost-effective and nimble online outlets.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/11/most-news-outlets-are-repetitive-new-york-times-repeats/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Most News Outlets Are Repetitive, New York Times Repeats</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/11/most-news-outlets-are-repetitive-new-york-times-repeats/">Most News Outlets Are Repetitive, New York Times Repeats</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 11 Jan 2010 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/11/most-news-outlets-are-repetitive-new-york-times-repeats/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19311521/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/11/most-news-outlets-are-repetitive-new-york-times-repeats/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Baltimore</category><category>ford</category><category>gannett</category><category>GCI</category><category>inthenews</category><category>journalism online</category><category>media</category><category>new york times</category><category>news</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>newspapers</category><category>NWS</category><category>ny times</category><category>nyt</category><category>pew research center</category><category>print media</category><category>washington post</category><category>WPO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Facebook Wants to Be MySpace]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/11/facebook-wants-to-be-myspace/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/11/facebook-wants-to-be-myspace/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/11/facebook-wants-to-be-myspace/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/facebook-logo-240.jpg" />If <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/MarkZuckerberg/">Mark Zuckerberg</a> knew then what he knows now ... <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Facebook/">Facebook</a> would be more like MySpace, which is now owned by News Corp. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas" target="_blank">NWS</a>). And, he's willing to admit this in public. </p>
<p>In a <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebooks_zuckerberg_says_the_age_of_privacy_is_ov.php" target="_blank">six-minute on-stage interview with TechCrunch</a>, Zuckerberg went on at length about the social media platform's privacy settings, <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/media/facebooks-new-privacy-settings-spark-a-public-spat/19286612/" target="_blank">which have been the subject of unending debate</a>. He says that he'd make more data public by default if he could start Facebook again. Though Zuckerberg cites Internet trends that indicate a reduced concern with privacy, the real reasons are more likely financial.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/11/facebook-wants-to-be-myspace/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Facebook Wants to Be MySpace</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/11/facebook-wants-to-be-myspace/">Facebook Wants to Be MySpace</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 11 Jan 2010 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/11/facebook-wants-to-be-myspace/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19311576/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/11/facebook-wants-to-be-myspace/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Digital Sky Technologies</category><category>facebook</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Mark Zuckerberg</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>myspace</category><category>myspace.com</category><category>news corp</category><category>news corporation</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>Privacy Policy</category><category>PrivacyRights</category><category>social media</category><category>twitter</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google to media: Your problems aren't our fault]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/04/google-to-media-your-problems-arent-our-fault/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/04/google-to-media-your-problems-arent-our-fault/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/04/google-to-media-your-problems-arent-our-fault/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/google-logo-200x150.jpg" alt="" />The newspaper industry continues to blame Google (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">GOOG</a>) for its woes, and Google continues to claim its innocence. The search engine giant's CEO, Eric Schmidt, says that his company could actually help the newspaper industry survive the shift from print to digital ... a shift that's been more than a decade in the making, he was kind enough not to note.</p>
<p>According to Schmidt, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5B23ED20091203" target="_blank">publishers need to dig into the online environment and find new ways to generate revenue</a>. "With dwindling revenue and diminished resources," he wrote in an op-ed piece published in News Corp's (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas" target="_blank">NWS</a>) <em><a href="http://www.wsj.com" target="_blank">Wall Street Journal</a></em>, "frustrated newspaper executives are looking for someone to blame."<br /><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/04/google-to-media-your-problems-arent-our-fault/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google to media: Your problems aren't our fault</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/04/google-to-media-your-problems-arent-our-fault/">Google to media: Your problems aren't our fault</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 04 Dec 2009 11:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/04/google-to-media-your-problems-arent-our-fault/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19264949/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/04/google-to-media-your-problems-arent-our-fault/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>eric schmidt</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>news corp</category><category>news corporation</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>NWS</category><category>search engines</category><category>wall street journal</category><category>wsj</category><category>WSJ.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 11:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New Facebook share structure hints at IPO]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/25/new-facebook-share-structure-hints-at-ipo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/25/new-facebook-share-structure-hints-at-ipo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/25/new-facebook-share-structure-hints-at-ipo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/initial-public-offerings/" rel="tag">Initial Public Offerings</a></p><p><img hspace="4" height="267" border="1" align="right" width="200" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/facebook.jpg" /><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Facebook/">Facebook</a> is implementing a new stock structure to make sure the founders retain control, immediately causing <a target="_blank" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34134876/ns/business-us_business/">rumors about an impending initial public offering</a>. Why would Facebook need Class A and Class B shares otherwise? Under the new structure, which is similar to Google's (<a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>), Mark Zuckerberg and other early entrants wouldn't have to worry about yielding the floor to outsiders <strike>when</strike> if the company goes public.</p>
<p>The stock structure was adopted to ensure that existing shareholders keep control on voting issues, according to Facebook statement. No details were given as to who the winners are in this arrangement, but a <em>Wall Street Journal</em> <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704779704574556053908778352.html?mod=WSJ_hps_LEFTWhatsNews">report</a> says that, according to its sources, all current shareholders would be converted to Class B shares, which carry 10 times the voting rights of Class A shares. <br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/25/new-facebook-share-structure-hints-at-ipo/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>New Facebook share structure hints at IPO</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/25/new-facebook-share-structure-hints-at-ipo/">New Facebook share structure hints at IPO</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34134876/ns/business-us_business/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/25/new-facebook-share-structure-hints-at-ipo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19253318/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/25/new-facebook-share-structure-hints-at-ipo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bancroft</category><category>Dow Jones</category><category>DowJones</category><category>facebook</category><category>featured</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>ipo</category><category>Mark Zuckerberg</category><category>MarkZuckerberg</category><category>new york times co.</category><category>news corp</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>NewYorkTimesCo.</category><category>NWS</category><category>nyt</category><category>pla</category><category>playboy</category><category>social media</category><category>SocialMedia</category><category>wall street journal</category><category>WallStreetJournal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft and News Corp talk about pushing Google aside]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/microsoft-and-news-corp-talk-about-pushing-google-aside/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/microsoft-and-news-corp-talk-about-pushing-google-aside/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/microsoft-and-news-corp-talk-about-pushing-google-aside/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img hspace="4" height="46" border="1" align="right" width="200" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/microsoft-msft-logo.jpg" alt="" />Often, we confuse winning with being the best. This isn't always the case. There are plenty of ways to get ahead when you don't have the top product on the market. The smoke-filled backroom meetings may be a thing of the past, but the net effect lingers. This is exactly what went down, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34099291/ns/business-us_business/" target="_blank">according to a Reuters report</a>, when Microsoft (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas" target="_blank">MSFT</a>) had a chat with News Corp (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas" target="_blank">NWS</a>).</p>
<p>Microsoft suggested a relationship with News Corp which would involve the latter's yanking its news sites from Google (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">GOOG</a>) ... for a fee, of course. This would cost the search engine giant -- which is also a news aggregation giant -- access to some hefty publications, including the <a href="http://www.wsj.com" target="_blank"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a>, the <em><a href="http://www.thesun.co.uk/" target="_blank">Sun</a></em> and the <em><a href="http://www.nypost.com" target="_blank">New York Post</a></em>.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/microsoft-and-news-corp-talk-about-pushing-google-aside/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft and News Corp talk about pushing Google aside</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/microsoft-and-news-corp-talk-about-pushing-google-aside/">Microsoft and News Corp talk about pushing Google aside</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34099291/ns/business-us_business/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/microsoft-and-news-corp-talk-about-pushing-google-aside/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19250417/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/microsoft-and-news-corp-talk-about-pushing-google-aside/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bing</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>new york post</category><category>news</category><category>news corp</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>newspaper</category><category>NewYorkPost</category><category>NWS</category><category>rupert murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><category>wall street journal</category><category>WallStreetJournal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple's Macs aren't safe from phishing attacks]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/apples-macs-arent-safe-from-phishing-attacks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/apples-macs-arent-safe-from-phishing-attacks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/apples-macs-arent-safe-from-phishing-attacks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/20070807161909990002.jpg" alt="" />Once upon a time, Mac users could brag they were much safer from malicious electronic attacks. After all, in the days before Google (<a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>), when Microsoft (<a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) was the only uber-player in town, Windows was the perpetual malware target. Phishers, however, aren't discriminating; they're just looking for an account to plunge. So, both Apple (<a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) and Microsoft users are threatened. Virus writers do tend to focus on the Windows operating system, which owns 90% of the OS market, <a target="_blank" href="http://blogs.usatoday.com/technologylive/2009/11/mac-phishing-attacks.html">but phishers are platform independent</a>.</p>
<p>Phishing involves attempts to get a user to reveal information about their accounts. Once the soon-to-be victim clicks that link or fills out a form, the "transaction" is complete -- no operating system interaction necessary. As a result, there really isn't any advantage to using a Mac over a PC.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/apples-macs-arent-safe-from-phishing-attacks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Apple's Macs aren't safe from phishing attacks</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/apples-macs-arent-safe-from-phishing-attacks/">Apple's Macs aren't safe from phishing attacks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://blogs.usatoday.com/technologylive/2009/11/mac-phishing-attacks.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/apples-macs-arent-safe-from-phishing-attacks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19244257/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/apples-macs-arent-safe-from-phishing-attacks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>eset</category><category>facebook</category><category>featured</category><category>gmail</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>hotmail</category><category>linkedin</category><category>linux</category><category>mac</category><category>malware</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>myspace</category><category>news corp</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>nws</category><category>operating system</category><category>OperatingSystem</category><category>phishing</category><category>social media</category><category>SocialMedia</category><category>solaris</category><category>twitter</category><category>windows</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hyatt and Ancestry.com IPOs: Beginners' luck?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/hyatt-and-ancestry-com-ipos-beginners-luck/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/hyatt-and-ancestry-com-ipos-beginners-luck/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/hyatt-and-ancestry-com-ipos-beginners-luck/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyx/" rel="tag">NYSE Euronext (NYX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/initial-public-offerings/" rel="tag">Initial Public Offerings</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/wallstreets.jpg" />The <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/IPO/">IPO</a> market has been pretty slow for the past two years due to the effects of a subprime mortgage crisis that turned into a credit crisis that turned into a worldwide financial crisis and recession. Nonetheless, <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/markets/2009-11-05-hyatt-ancestry-ipos_N.htm" target="_blank">two companies made their debuts Thursday</a> -- one on the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nyse-euronext/nyx/nys" target="_blank">NYSE</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nyse-euronext/nyx/nys" target="_blank">NYX</a>), the other on the NASDAQ -- and they nailed it. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hyatt-hotels-corp/h/nys" target="_blank">Hyatt Hotels</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hyatt-hotels-corp/h/nys" target="_blank">H</a>) gave its investors a 12% gain on its first Big Board trading day, and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ancestry-com/acom/nas" target="_blank">Ancestry.com</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ancestry-com/acom/nas" target="_blank">ACOM</a>) switched those digits, jumping 21% in its first day of trading.</p>
<p>Hyatt Hotels overcame two major concerns. The worldwide travel market slump has been tough on hotel companies, and Hyatt has been subject to the same forces as everyone else. Also, investors may have been worried about infighting among the founder's heirs (the Pritzker family), but the double-digit price increase suggests that investors don't foresee Bancroft-style squabbles screwing investors -- or, if you don't like Dow Jones, now a part of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas" target="_blank">News Corp</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas" target="_blank">NWS</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/playboy-enterprises-inc/pla/nys" target="_blank">Playboy</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/playboy-enterprises-inc/pla/nys">PLA</a>) makes the same point. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/hyatt-and-ancestry-com-ipos-beginners-luck/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Hyatt and Ancestry.com IPOs: Beginners' luck?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/hyatt-and-ancestry-com-ipos-beginners-luck/">Hyatt and Ancestry.com IPOs: Beginners' luck?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/markets/2009-11-05-hyatt-ancestry-ipos_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/hyatt-and-ancestry-com-ipos-beginners-luck/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19226281/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/hyatt-and-ancestry-com-ipos-beginners-luck/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>acom</category><category>aei</category><category>ancestry.com</category><category>bancroft</category><category>dow jones</category><category>DowJones</category><category>h</category><category>hyatt</category><category>initial public offering</category><category>InitialPublicOffering</category><category>inthenews</category><category>ipo</category><category>news corp</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>nws</category><category>nyse</category><category>nyse euronext</category><category>NyseEuronext</category><category>nyx</category><category>pla</category><category>playboy</category><category>pritzker</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time and WSJ to lay off more]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/time-and-wsj-to-lay-off-more/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/time-and-wsj-to-lay-off-more/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/time-and-wsj-to-lay-off-more/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/wall_street_journal_240.jpg" alt="" />The mayhem in the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/media/">media</a> industry continues. The <a href="http://www.wsj.com" target="_blank">Wall Street Journal</a>, a <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas" target="_blank">News Corp</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas" target="_blank">NWS</a>) property, is <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlny/the_revolving_door/more_business_journalism_layoffs_wall_street_journal_closes_boston_office_141650.asp" target="_blank">closing its Boston bureau and sending nine employees into the wind</a>. The newswire and <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com" target="_blank">MarketWatch</a> operations are going to stay open in <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Boston/">Boston</a>, however, with no headcount impact. </p>
<p>The Journal doesn't have any plans to close other offices, according to a memo by managing editor Robert Thomson: "there are no plans, nascent or otherwise, to close any other U.S. or international bureau." The <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/WSJ/">WSJ</a> will still support an "investigative function" in Boston, but the New York-based Money and Investing team will cover Boston's <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/mutualfund/">mutual fund</a> industry, which boasts such heavy hitters as <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Fidelity/">Fidelity</a>. </p>
<p>At the same time, magazine company <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/TimeInc/">Time Inc</a>., owned by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys" target="_blank">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys" target="_blank">TWX</a>) is looking to cut $100 million in expenses, and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/layoffs/">layoffs</a> will undoubtedly figure into the equation. The company that owns <a href="http://www.time.com" target="_blank">Time</a>, <a href="http://www.fortune.com" target="_blank">Fortune</a>, <a href="http://www.people.com" target="_blank">People</a> and <a href="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/" target="_blank">Sports Illustrated</a> - and falls under the same umbrella as <a href="http://www.aol.com" target="_blank">AOL</a>, which owns <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com" target="_blank">BloggingStocks</a> - is feeling the squeeze of a media recession that's even worse than the regular recession we've all been battling for what feels like decades. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/time-and-wsj-to-lay-off-more/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Time and WSJ to lay off more</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/time-and-wsj-to-lay-off-more/">Time and WSJ to lay off more</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/time-and-wsj-to-lay-off-more/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19216496/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/time-and-wsj-to-lay-off-more/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aol</category><category>boston</category><category>boston globe</category><category>boston.com</category><category>BostonGlobe</category><category>conde nast</category><category>CondeNast</category><category>cost cutting</category><category>CostCutting</category><category>fortune</category><category>graydon carter</category><category>GraydonCarter</category><category>inthenews</category><category>layoff</category><category>layoffs</category><category>magazine</category><category>magazines</category><category>marketwatch</category><category>mckinsey</category><category>mckinseyco.</category><category>MutualFunds</category><category>new york</category><category>new york times</category><category>new york times co.</category><category>news corp</category><category>news corpb nws</category><category>news corporation</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>NewsCorporation</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes</category><category>PeopleMagazine</category><category>SportsIllustrated</category><category>time</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeInc</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>twx</category><category>VanityFair</category><category>wsj</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[MySpace focuses on social entertainment, says Facebook not a competitor]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/myspace-focuses-on-social-entertainment-says-facebook-not-a-com/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/myspace-focuses-on-social-entertainment-says-facebook-not-a-com/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/myspace-focuses-on-social-entertainment-says-facebook-not-a-com/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/10/myspace.jpg" width="100" height="99" alt="" />It was still a good idea for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">News Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">NWS</a>) to buy MySpace.com over fours years ago for a little more than half a billion. The social media network <a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/07/09/myspace-sales-down-while-facebook-revenue-up-in-2009/">still brings in decent ad revenues</a>, even though it is out of the popular fad culture of social media. That space is now owned by Facebook and Twitter. But then MySpace CEO Owen Van Natta says that his company is "fundamentally different" than Facebook -- as in a special experience providing entertainment content -- those words could come back to haunt him.</p>
<p>As will words like "I really don't view Facebook as a competitor." While it's true that Facebook and MySpace go after two types of online social interaction, they are both vying for many of the same customers in a large crossover audience. Teens, 20-somethings, and others are very fickle and many use both social networks. The two may have different goals, but they are competitors.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/myspace-focuses-on-social-entertainment-says-facebook-not-a-com/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>MySpace focuses on social entertainment, says Facebook not a competitor</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/myspace-focuses-on-social-entertainment-says-facebook-not-a-com/">MySpace focuses on social entertainment, says Facebook not a competitor</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=aX6CarmEjeK4>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/myspace-focuses-on-social-entertainment-says-facebook-not-a-com/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19206932/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/myspace-focuses-on-social-entertainment-says-facebook-not-a-com/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Facebook</category><category>inthenews</category><category>MySpace</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>NWS</category><category>Owen Van Natta</category><category>Social Media</category><category>Social Networking</category><category>Twitter</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[MySpace (still) refocusing on entertainment content]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/myspace-still-refocusing-on-entertainment-content/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/myspace-still-refocusing-on-entertainment-content/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/myspace-still-refocusing-on-entertainment-content/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/myspace-screen-grab.gif" />A new executive team is trying to bring MySpace back to its former glory. By focusing on music, videos and games, it hopes to <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703790404574473523398458990.html">recapture some of its luster</a>. With the <a href="http://www.myspace.com" target="_blank">MySpace</a> refugees mounting, it's time for some new blood to make some brilliant, future-changing decisions. This week, the company is holding a conference for its global ad sales team to explore ways to bring in traffic and beef up ad spending. </p>
<p>MySpace is poised to haul in $495 million in ad revenue this year, down 15% from last year's $585 million, according to research firm <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/eMarketer/">eMarketer</a>. In August, MySpace attracted 64.2 million unique visitors from the United States, off 15% from August 2008, according to comScore, while <a href="http://www.facebook.com" target="_blank">Facebook</a> pulled in 92.2 million unique U.S. visitors - up more than 100% year-over-year.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/myspace-still-refocusing-on-entertainment-content/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>MySpace (still) refocusing on entertainment content</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/myspace-still-refocusing-on-entertainment-content/">MySpace (still) refocusing on entertainment content</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703790404574473523398458990.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/myspace-still-refocusing-on-entertainment-content/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19200627/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/myspace-still-refocusing-on-entertainment-content/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>comscore</category><category>dis</category><category>disney</category><category>emarketer</category><category>entertainment</category><category>facebook</category><category>ge</category><category>general electric</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>hulu</category><category>inthenews</category><category>media</category><category>mtv</category><category>myspace</category><category>nbc</category><category>newscorp</category><category>nws</category><category>owen van natta</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>twitter</category><category>twx</category><category>walt disney</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><category>youtube</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Broadcasters, ad folks desperate for a better audience-measuring mousetrap]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/12/broadcasters-ad-folks-desperate-for-a-better-audience-measuring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/12/broadcasters-ad-folks-desperate-for-a-better-audience-measuring/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/12/broadcasters-ad-folks-desperate-for-a-better-audience-measuring/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/04/television200ro0120.jpg" />It took a while, but the broadcast media community is starting to realize that <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/media/2009-09-10-audience-network-tv_N.htm" target="_blank">Nielsen Media may not have the answers</a> to all their audience-related questions.</p>
<p>So, 14 of the largest players in the space -- including programmers, advertisers, and ad buyers -- are shelling out some cash to see if there's a better way. The group claims it isn't looking for an alternative to Nielsen ... but let's do the math on this one. If they aren't looking for some new choices, then just what the hell are they doing?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/12/broadcasters-ad-folks-desperate-for-a-better-audience-measuring/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Broadcasters, ad folks desperate for a better audience-measuring mousetrap</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/12/broadcasters-ad-folks-desperate-for-a-better-audience-measuring/">Broadcasters, ad folks desperate for a better audience-measuring mousetrap</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/12/broadcasters-ad-folks-desperate-for-a-better-audience-measuring/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19158992/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/12/broadcasters-ad-folks-desperate-for-a-better-audience-measuring/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>broadcasters</category><category>cbs</category><category>dis</category><category>disney</category><category>ge</category><category>general electric</category><category>inthenews</category><category>media</category><category>nbc universal</category><category>news corp</category><category>news corporation</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>nws</category><category>omc</category><category>omnicom</category><category>television</category><category>timewarner</category><category>twx</category><category>walt disney</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Seacrest is in as  "Idol" producer pays $45 million for its host ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/seacrest-is-in-as-idol-producer-pays-45-million-for-its-host/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/seacrest-is-in-as-idol-producer-pays-45-million-for-its-host/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/seacrest-is-in-as-idol-producer-pays-45-million-for-its-host/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><a target="_blank" href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3404/3430136009_b788f8ab76_m.jpg"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="American Idol host Ryan Seacrest signs $45 million deal" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/07/idol.jpg" /></a>Love him or hate him (I'm ... ahem ... in the first camp), you have to admit his career's been impressive. Ryan Seacrest has parlayed his <em>American Idol </em>hosting gig into a lucrative $45 million, three-year deal. CKX, parent of <em>Idol </em>producer 19 Entertainment, is <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/peopleNews/idUSTRE5690YQ20090713" target="_blank">making </a>Seacrest the richest-ever reality host. Recession, out! <br /><br />This could be taken as a sign that the juggernaut known as <em>American Idol </em>is far from slowing down. The "talent" showcase, which airs for dozens and dozens of hours each spring on <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">News Corp.'s</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas" target="_blank">NWS</a>) FOX, has seen ratings slip slightly during its eight seasons but remains the top-rated show on television, by a long shot. Committing to Seacrest for an additional three years means we'll have at least three more dramatic seasons, three more top twelves, and hopefully at least three more contestants with the talent of Adam Lambert, Jennifer Hudson, or Kelly Clarkson. <br /><br /><em></em><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/seacrest-is-in-as-idol-producer-pays-45-million-for-its-host/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Seacrest is in as  "Idol" producer pays $45 million for its host </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/seacrest-is-in-as-idol-producer-pays-45-million-for-its-host/">Seacrest is in as  "Idol" producer pays $45 million for its host </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/peopleNews/idUSTRE5690YQ20090713>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/seacrest-is-in-as-idol-producer-pays-45-million-for-its-host/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19096045/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/seacrest-is-in-as-idol-producer-pays-45-million-for-its-host/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>19 entertainment</category><category>19Entertainment</category><category>american idol</category><category>AmericanIdol</category><category>fox</category><category>inthenews</category><category>news corp</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>nws</category><category>ryan seacrest</category><category>RyanSeacrest</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time on social networks doubles ... but does revenue?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/time-on-social-networks-doubles-but-does-revenue/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/time-on-social-networks-doubles-but-does-revenue/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/time-on-social-networks-doubles-but-does-revenue/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/facebooklogo.jpg" /><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Socialnetworking/">Social networking</a> sites gained a lot of eyeball-share last year. The time that users spent on sites like Facebook, <a href="http://twitter.com/bloggingstocks" target="_blank">Twitter</a> and MySpace nearly doubled in the past year, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/lifestyleMolt/idUSTRE5520O620090603">increasing by 83%</a> relative to April 2008. The number of minutes spent on Facebook by its 200 million active members spiked 700% year-over-year to 13.9 billion. The second most popular social networking site, MySpace, saw a 31% fall in minutes spent on the site to 4.97 billion, but ranked number one in video stream consumption. </p>
<p>Blogger, Tagged and Twitter took the third, fourth and fifth spots. In April 2009, the number of tweets unleashed shot up 3,712% from April 2008.</p>
<p>The missing link? Money. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/time-on-social-networks-doubles-but-does-revenue/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Time on social networks doubles ... but does revenue?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/time-on-social-networks-doubles-but-does-revenue/">Time on social networks doubles ... but does revenue?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 04 Jun 2009 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/lifestyleMolt/idUSTRE5520O620090603>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/time-on-social-networks-doubles-but-does-revenue/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19057445/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/time-on-social-networks-doubles-but-does-revenue/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>blogger</category><category>inthenews</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>news corp</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>nws</category><category>social networking</category><category>socialnetworking</category><category>tagged</category><category>twitter</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Have media stocks come too far too fast?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/23/have-media-stocks-come-too-far-too-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/23/have-media-stocks-come-too-far-too-fast/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/23/have-media-stocks-come-too-far-too-fast/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/nick-disney-200cs080708.jpg" alt="" />Another day, another rally. Makes you want to buy, doesn't it? While my cold, frosty bearishness is beginning to thaw a little bit based on recent market price action, don't call me a bull just yet. Believe me, I can't wait for the day when I am completely confident about equities. That day hasn't come just yet, though.</p>
<p>Which brings me to the media sector. Have you checked out the one-month returns on <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">Viacom, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">News Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">NWS</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">The Walt Disney Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>)? I've been watching these three stocks and have noticed that the one-month performances on all of them, as of this writing and according to AOL Finance data, are pretty good. Viacom is up something like 21%, News Corp. has advanced 16%, and Disney has appreciated by 9%. I mean, that's more than pretty good: that's wildly impressive. And it gives you a good feeling, doesn't it?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/23/have-media-stocks-come-too-far-too-fast/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Have media stocks come too far too fast?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/23/have-media-stocks-come-too-far-too-fast/">Have media stocks come too far too fast?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://finance.aol.com/glossary/short%20covering>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/23/have-media-stocks-come-too-far-too-fast/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1496019/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/23/have-media-stocks-come-too-far-too-fast/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>media</category><category>news corp</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>NWS</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Tyler Perry's new 'Madea' movie brings in bucks for Lions Gate]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/tyler-perrys-new-madea-movie-brings-in-bucks-for-lions-gate/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/tyler-perrys-new-madea-movie-brings-in-bucks-for-lions-gate/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/tyler-perrys-new-madea-movie-brings-in-bucks-for-lions-gate/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/made_goes_poster.jpg" />According to <a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/">Boxofficemojo</a>, <em>Tyler Perry's Madea Goes to Jail</em> came out on top over the weekend at domestic theaters. As of early estimates, the film brought in over $40 million, proving that Tyler Perry's name can still sell tickets. This is great news for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lions-gate-entertainment-corp/lgf/nys">Lions Gate Entertainment</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lions-gate-entertainment-corp/lgf/nys">LGF</a>), which was looking to score a big hit after experiencing some <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/10/lions-gates-q3-reflects-risky-movie-business/">weak performances</a> at the box office.</p>
<p>Tyler Perry beat out <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corp.</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>) successful thriller <em>Taken</em>, which landed in the second spot. Coming in third was <em>Coraline</em> from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric Company</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) Focus Features, although those two films could change positions once final numbers are in. Both of them scored around the $11 million mark. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner Inc</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) <em>He's Just Not That Into You</em> was fourth and News Corp.'s <em>Slumdog Millionaire</em>, the toast of the Oscars telecast last night, was fifth. Both of those features scored similar amounts, about $8 million each, so we'll see what happens with their respective rankings. Poor Jason Voorhees. Last week, his movie, <em><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/time-warner-and-jason-take-the-top-spot-at-the-box-office/">Friday the 13th</a></em>, killed at the box office. This week, the slasher dropped 80% in terms of gross and landed in sixth place after debuting in the top slot. Talk about a bloody decline for Time Warner. Horror movies do tend to go down fast after the opening weekend, but I thought this particular feature might exhibit more strength.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/tyler-perrys-new-madea-movie-brings-in-bucks-for-lions-gate/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Tyler Perry's new 'Madea' movie brings in bucks for Lions Gate</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/tyler-perrys-new-madea-movie-brings-in-bucks-for-lions-gate/">Tyler Perry's new 'Madea' movie brings in bucks for Lions Gate</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.latimes.com/business/investing/la-fi-lionsgate21-2009feb21,0,2154761.story>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/tyler-perrys-new-madea-movie-brings-in-bucks-for-lions-gate/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1468938/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/23/tyler-perrys-new-madea-movie-brings-in-bucks-for-lions-gate/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>carl icahn</category><category>CarlIcahn</category><category>Coraline</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>Hes Just Not That Into You</category><category>HesJustNotThatIntoYou</category><category>jason voorhees</category><category>JasonVoorhees</category><category>LGF</category><category>lions gate entertainment</category><category>LionsGateEntertainment</category><category>news corp</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>NWS</category><category>slumdog millionaire</category><category>SlumdogMillionaire</category><category>Taken</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>Tyler Perry</category><category>tyler perrys madea goes to jail</category><category>TylerPerry</category><category>TylerPerrysMadeaGoesToJail</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Whedon's 'Dollhouse' flops; how long will FOX hang on?  ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/whedons-dollhouse-flops-how-long-will-fox-hang-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/whedons-dollhouse-flops-how-long-will-fox-hang-on/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/whedons-dollhouse-flops-how-long-will-fox-hang-on/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><a href="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/28/46904854_399ad78ed0_m.jpg" target="_blank"><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/joss-whedon.jpg" id="img1" alt="" /></a>Fans of Joss Whedon's critically acclaimed and cult-followed shows, <em>Buffy the Vampire Slayer </em>and<em> Angel</em>, were amped about the creator/writer/director's latest project, <em>Dollhouse</em>. Unfortunately? <a href="http://www.thrfeed.com/2009/02/dollhouse-terminator-premiere-ratings.html" target="_blank">Few of them</a> tuned in. <br /><br />The Eliza-Dushku mid-season effort, a sci-fi series about special agents who can be cloned with traits and personalities, saw just 4.7 million viewers tune in, nabbing a 6 share and a 2.0 rating among adults 18-49. In fact, <em>Dollhouse </em>was the second lowest-rated series premiere this season (on a major network). Guys? It was beaten by <em>Supernanny</em>, which aired on <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Walt Disney's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys" target="_blank">DIS</a>) ABC and attracted 6.1 million viewers.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/whedons-dollhouse-flops-how-long-will-fox-hang-on/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Whedon's 'Dollhouse' flops; how long will FOX hang on?  </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/whedons-dollhouse-flops-how-long-will-fox-hang-on/">Whedon's 'Dollhouse' flops; how long will FOX hang on?  </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:36:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.thrfeed.com/2009/02/dollhouse-terminator-premiere-ratings.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/whedons-dollhouse-flops-how-long-will-fox-hang-on/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1463155/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/whedons-dollhouse-flops-how-long-will-fox-hang-on/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>angel</category><category>buffy the vampire slayer</category><category>BuffyTheVampireSlayer</category><category>dollhouse</category><category>fox</category><category>joss whedon</category><category>JossWhedon</category><category>news corp</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>television</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:36:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Mouse is caught in recession trap: Should you sell Disney?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/the-mouse-is-caught-in-recession-trap-should-you-sell-disney/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/the-mouse-is-caught-in-recession-trap-should-you-sell-disney/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/the-mouse-is-caught-in-recession-trap-should-you-sell-disney/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/erts/" rel="tag">Electronic Arts (ERTS)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/walt-disney-company-dis-logo.jpg" />Whoa, what a terrible quarter for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>)! Forget the magic. There's <em>no</em> magic going on at Disney. For the fiscal <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/the-walt-disney-company-reports-first/rfid181732098">first quarter</a>, revenues decreased 8%, earnings per share decreased 29%, operational cash flow decreased 60%, and free cash flow was negative. Decrease, decrease, decrease! Looks like Disney's brands cannot fend off a recession, no question. Sorry, Jonas Brothers and Hannah Montana. </p>
<p>Disney, which competes with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">Viacom</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) NBC Universal, earned, after taking out a $0.04 per-share benefit from an investment sale, $0.41 per share. According to my <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/earnings-preview-will-disney-deliver-the-magic/">earnings preview</a>, the call was for around $0.52 per share. Well, I thought the Mouse was going to miss, but I think I characterized the potential miss as maybe being on the "slight" side. Yeah, this wasn't a slight miss.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/the-mouse-is-caught-in-recession-trap-should-you-sell-disney/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Mouse is caught in recession trap: Should you sell Disney?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/the-mouse-is-caught-in-recession-trap-should-you-sell-disney/">The Mouse is caught in recession trap: Should you sell Disney?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 17:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/the-mouse-is-caught-in-recession-trap-should-you-sell-disney/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1449264/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/the-mouse-is-caught-in-recession-trap-should-you-sell-disney/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bob Iger</category><category>BobIger</category><category>CBS</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>electronic arts</category><category>ElectronicArts</category><category>ERTS</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>hannah montana</category><category>HannahMontana</category><category>high school musical 2</category><category>HighSchoolMusical2</category><category>jonas brothers</category><category>JonasBrothers</category><category>media</category><category>NBC Universal</category><category>NbcUniversal</category><category>news corp</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>NWS</category><category>pirates of the caribbean at worlds end</category><category>PiratesOfTheCaribbeanAtWorldsEnd</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 17:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Earnings preview: Will Disney deliver the magic?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/earnings-preview-will-disney-deliver-the-magic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/earnings-preview-will-disney-deliver-the-magic/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/earnings-preview-will-disney-deliver-the-magic/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys"><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/disney.jpg" />Disney</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) will be reporting earnings for the fiscal first quarter Tuesday after the market close. There shouldn't be any growth in the bottom line. Of course, no one should be surprised by that. After all, this is Disney we're talking about, a company which provides goods and services that can easily be cut out of any consumer budget. Remember, conservation of cash is becoming quite the fad. <br /></p>
<p>According to this <a href="http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?ticker=DIS&amp;coid=129198&amp;client=cb">source</a>, Disney may earn $0.52 per share.That would represent a contraction of $0.11, or 17%. The big question is whether or not Disney will miss. If it does, investors won't be happy, because it'll be the second miss in a row. Wall Street was previously accustomed to seeing the Mouse religiously beat the analysts at their holy game. But <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/07/disney-misses-in-q4-is-the-magic-over/">Q4</a> changed the story. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/earnings-preview-will-disney-deliver-the-magic/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Earnings preview: Will Disney deliver the magic?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/earnings-preview-will-disney-deliver-the-magic/">Earnings preview: Will Disney deliver the magic?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 02 Feb 2009 08:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?ticker=DIS&amp;coid=129198&amp;client=cb>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/earnings-preview-will-disney-deliver-the-magic/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1446783/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/earnings-preview-will-disney-deliver-the-magic/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ABC</category><category>Bob Iger</category><category>BobIger</category><category>Bolt</category><category>CBS</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>earnings preview</category><category>EarningsPreview</category><category>entertainment</category><category>ESPN</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>High School Musical</category><category>HighSchoolMusical</category><category>media</category><category>news corp</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>NWS</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 08:50:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
