<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Newsweek taps Stephen Colbert as guest editor]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/newsweek-taps-stephen-colbert-as-guest-editor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/newsweek-taps-stephen-colbert-as-guest-editor/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/newsweek-taps-stephen-colbert-as-guest-editor/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<img width="218" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="231" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/06/book.gif" alt="" />Newsweek unveiled its redesign just two weeks ago, but the company is already shaking things up big on the content side. Exhibit A: The June 8th issue will feature political satirist/professional Bill O'Reilly impersonator Stephen Colbert. This is newsworthy for two reasons: 1.) It's the first guest editor in the history of the magazine and 2.) The guest editor is a fake person of sorts -- a persona created by a comedian to mock the right-wing and expose hypocrisy.<br /><br />Editor Jon Meacham <a href="http://www.observer.com/2009/media/newsweek-turns-tina-tricks-meet-guest-editor-%E2%80%A6-stephen-colbert">told The New York Observer</a> that "I was just very impressed with the range of his knowledge and he had an almost encyclopedic feel for anything that came up. As we think about ways to both inform and surprise readers of the magazine, the notion of having him as a guest editor seemed like a good one."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/newsweek-taps-stephen-colbert-as-guest-editor/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Newsweek taps Stephen Colbert as guest editor</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/newsweek-taps-stephen-colbert-as-guest-editor/">Newsweek taps Stephen Colbert as guest editor</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 03 Jun 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.observer.com/2009/media/newsweek-turns-tina-tricks-meet-guest-editor-%E2%80%A6-stephen-colbert>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/newsweek-taps-stephen-colbert-as-guest-editor/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19056727/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/03/newsweek-taps-stephen-colbert-as-guest-editor/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>journalism</category><category>newspapers</category><category>newsweek</category><category>Steven Colbert</category><category>StevenColbert</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can magazines get away with price increases?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/13/can-magazines-get-away-with-price-increases/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/13/can-magazines-get-away-with-price-increases/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/13/can-magazines-get-away-with-price-increases/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><img  hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/newsstand.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />With circulation declining in large part due to the huge amount of free content available on the internet, some magazine publishers are adopting what seems like a counter-intuitive approach to competing: raising prices.<br /><br />Magazines like <em>Time, Newsweek, Business Week </em>and even the upmarket<em> New Yorker</em> have long relied on low subscription prices to attract large numbers of subscribers, which in turn attracts advertisers. But the <em>New York Times</em> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/13/business/media/13circ.html?_r=2&amp;ref=business&amp;pagewanted=all">reports</a> that <em>The Economist</em> has raised its price substantially of late and is still continuing to buck the trend of declining circulation. That has other publishers taking notice, and many are planning to increase their subscription and newsstand rates, after years of falling prices.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/13/can-magazines-get-away-with-price-increases/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Can magazines get away with price increases?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/13/can-magazines-get-away-with-price-increases/">Can magazines get away with price increases?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/13/business/media/13circ.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business&amp;pagewanted=all>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/13/can-magazines-get-away-with-price-increases/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1515137/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/13/can-magazines-get-away-with-price-increases/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>businessWeek</category><category>Economist</category><category>Magazines</category><category>New Yorker</category><category>Newsweek</category><category>NewYorker</category><category>Time</category><category>twmc</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Washington Post (WPO) misses the mark]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/washington-post-wpo-misses-the-mark/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/washington-post-wpo-misses-the-mark/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/washington-post-wpo-misses-the-mark/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img hspace="4" height="51" border="0" align="right" width="253" vspace="4" alt="Washington Post Q4 2008 Earnings" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/wpo.jpg" />Shares of the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-washington-post-company/wpo/nys">Washington Post Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-washington-post-company/wpo/nys">WPO</a>) are trading in the red this morning after the company reported that its fourth quarter <a href="http://www.timesdispatch.com/rtd/business/local/article/POSTGAT25_20090225-090606/215305/">profit dropped by a massive 77%</a>. Net income came in at $2.01 per share, verse $8.71 per share in the same period last year.<br /><br />As I noted in the earnings preview yesterday, the company's flagship newspaper and its magazine division (<em>Newsweek Magazine</em>) have been hit hard with losses in advertising revenue, and both had a dismal 2008 year. The company's newspaper division <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/25/AR2009022500951.html?hpid=moreheadlines">lost $14.4 million</a> in the fourth quarter and had a $192.4 million operating loss for the entire 2008 year. Its newspaper division had a slight profit of $10.9 million in the fourth quarter, but on a full year basis it posted a loss of $16.1 million.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/washington-post-wpo-misses-the-mark/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Washington Post (WPO) misses the mark</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/washington-post-wpo-misses-the-mark/">Washington Post (WPO) misses the mark</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/washington-post-wpo-misses-the-mark/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1471190/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/washington-post-wpo-misses-the-mark/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advertising</category><category>bad news</category><category>BadNews</category><category>earnings</category><category>internet</category><category>inthenews</category><category>management</category><category>news</category><category>news and media</category><category>NewsAndMedia</category><category>NewsWeek</category><category>online</category><category>online advertising</category><category>OnlineAdvertising</category><category>Washington Post</category><category>WashingtonPost</category><category>wpo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[In terms of trouble, magazines are the new newspapers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/05/in-terms-of-trouble-magazines-are-the-new-newspapers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/05/in-terms-of-trouble-magazines-are-the-new-newspapers/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/05/in-terms-of-trouble-magazines-are-the-new-newspapers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a></p><p><a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Zeitschriften.JPG"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/magazine.jpg" alt="" /></a>Magazine publishers have believed that consumers and advertisers view them as very different from the daily newspaper. The paper is only read by the consumer for an hour, or maybe less. At the end of the day, it is gone. People will take an issue of<em> Newsweek </em>or <em>Good Housekeeping </em>around for days or even months. They may pick it up and read in several times. </p>
<p>Magazines have a longer "shelf life" than newspapers. That should make them more attractive to advertisers.</p>
<p>Some newspaper companies are actually going out of business. Others. like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">The New York Times Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">NYT</a>) are facing the need to sell assets. The industry has crumbled in just a couple of years as information consumption has moved to the internet.</p>
<p>Early advertising results from this year show that magazines may be the next newspapers and that by 2010 some of them and the companies which own them may be in very deep trouble.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/05/in-terms-of-trouble-magazines-are-the-new-newspapers/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>In terms of trouble, magazines are the new newspapers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/05/in-terms-of-trouble-magazines-are-the-new-newspapers/">In terms of trouble, magazines are the new newspapers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 05 Jan 2009 13:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/05/in-terms-of-trouble-magazines-are-the-new-newspapers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1418629/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/05/in-terms-of-trouble-magazines-are-the-new-newspapers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advertising</category><category>Conde Mast</category><category>CondeMast</category><category>inthenews</category><category>magazines</category><category>Newsweek</category><category>NYT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 13:27:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[As US News goes monthly, magazines must face their fate]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/05/as-us-news-goes-monthly-magazines-must-face-their-fate/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/05/as-us-news-goes-monthly-magazines-must-face-their-fate/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/05/as-us-news-goes-monthly-magazines-must-face-their-fate/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p><p><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="US News and World Report " src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/usnews.jpg" />US News</em> admitted that the advertising climate and competition from <em>Time</em> and <em>Newsweek</em> was too tough, so after decades as a weekly, it said a while back that it would publish 26 times in 2009. That is a lot of savings in printing and postage. The publication probably let a few people go.</p>
<p>But the magazine never made it to its new publishing frequency. Things are so bad in print advertising that now it says it will go monthly. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/05/business/media/05mag.html?ref=business">According to</a> <em>The New York Times "</em>Just five months after saying it would drop its frequency to every other week, U.S. News &amp; World Report has decided instead to become a monthly magazine."</p>
<br /><iframe width="205" height="185" frameborder="0" align="left" src="http://webcenter.polls.aol.com/modular.jsp?template=1422&amp;view=155277&amp;pollId=155557&amp;channel=aol_us_moneynews1&amp;popup=yes"></iframe> <iframe width="205" height="205" frameborder="0" align="right" src="http://webcenter.polls.aol.com/modular.jsp?template=1422&amp;view=155278&amp;pollId=155558&amp;channel=aol_us_moneynews1&amp;popup=yes"></iframe> <br clear="all" />
<p>The magazine, which was founded in 1948, might as well fold. Putting out a news publication once a month when the internet allows people to get news minute-by-minute is not a smart idea. There is a good chance the magazine will not be around at the end of next year.</p>
<p>Over the last week, large magazine publishers like Rodale, Time, Inc., and Conde Nast have put a total of over 1,000 people out of work. The magazine industry is beginning to look like the newspaper sector. That means it is trapped without a way out. <br /></p>
<p>As magazine publishers focus more on the internet, they confront competition like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) News and <em>CNN.</em> Even on the web, publishing is too crowded for everyone to make it.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at <a href="http://www.247wallst.com">247WallSt.com</a>. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/05/as-us-news-goes-monthly-magazines-must-face-their-fate/">As US News goes monthly, magazines must face their fate</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 05 Nov 2008 12:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/05/business/media/05mag.html?ref=business>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/05/as-us-news-goes-monthly-magazines-must-face-their-fate/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1362628/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/05/as-us-news-goes-monthly-magazines-must-face-their-fate/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>110508</category><category>GOOG</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Newsweek</category><category>Time</category><category>US News</category><category>UsNews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 12:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[USA Today ad revenue in free fall, a nightmare for the future of print]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/18/usa-today-ad-revenue-in-free-fall-a-nightmare-for-the-future-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/18/usa-today-ad-revenue-in-free-fall-a-nightmare-for-the-future-of/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/18/usa-today-ad-revenue-in-free-fall-a-nightmare-for-the-future-of/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gci/" rel="tag">Gannett Co (GCI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gannett-inc-del/gci/nys">Gannett</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gannett-inc-del/gci/nys">GCI</a>) announced it May revenue results. Nothing in them was surprising. </p>
<p><a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/gannett-co-inc-releases-may-statistical/rfid113534567">According to</a> the country's largest newspaper company, "Publishing advertising revenues in May were 14.3 percent lower." Classified ad revenue fell even more, almost 20%. Auto, real estate, and jobs marketing have begun to leave newspapers and financial trouble within those industries has cut their ad budgets to the bone.</p>
<p>The most disturbing piece of new is the report was that at <em>USA Today</em>, advertising revenue was 18.4 percent lower on paid ad pages of 260 versus 324 last year.</p>
<p>USA Today is part newspaper, part daily magazine. It uses color and graphics in a way that is closer to <em>Time, Newsweek, or BusinessWeek </em>than to a typical daily paper. It is also a national product, not local like other papers.</p>
<p>If the country's largest paper, and one of only two papers distributed widely in the USA is in such trouble, it may be a sign that the print ad downturn is moving quickly from newspapers to magazines. Some weekly publications like <em>BusinessWeek</em> are seeing double digit ad drops. </p>
<p>Newspapers may not be the last part of the print publication industry to fall apart.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/18/usa-today-ad-revenue-in-free-fall-a-nightmare-for-the-future-of/">USA Today ad revenue in free fall, a nightmare for the future of print</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/gannett-co-inc-releases-may-statistical/rfid113534567>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/18/usa-today-ad-revenue-in-free-fall-a-nightmare-for-the-future-of/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1228882/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/18/usa-today-ad-revenue-in-free-fall-a-nightmare-for-the-future-of/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BusinessWeek</category><category>GCI</category><category>inthenews</category><category>magazines</category><category>newspapers</category><category>Newsweek</category><category>publishing</category><category>Time</category><category>USA Today</category><category>UsaToday</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[61 colleges boycott U.S. News rankings]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/24/61-colleges-boycott-u-s-news-rankings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/24/61-colleges-boycott-u-s-news-rankings/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/24/61-colleges-boycott-u-s-news-rankings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a></p><p>Score one for the triumph of principles over marketing. At least in the case of small colleges.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=ai5lmS7OvpEU&amp;refer=exclusive">According to a Bloomberg report</a>, "The presidents of Holy Cross, Lafayette, Trinity and 58 other liberal arts schools have pledged in the past 10 weeks to withhold cooperation from Washington-based <em>U.S. News</em> on the most controversial element of its 24-year-old survey, a questionnaire asking colleges to assess competing schools."</p>
<p>Interestingly, no top-25 ranked school has joined the boycott. Bloomberg goes on to say that "Three-quarters of each school's score is based on information that is for the most part publicly available, such as class size, graduation and acceptance rates, and alumni giving. The controversial 25 percent comes from a 'reputational survey,' in which thousands of presidents, deans and provosts are asked to grade other schools' reputations."</p>
<p>I've always been unimpressed with these college ranking magazines. It seems like a great way to sell magazines to ambitious high school students and their parents, but I'm not sure I get the point: Shouldn't college be about finding the right fit rather than the best-ranked school you can get into? I know of no student who has regretted choosing a college based on which one he liked the best in terms of the experience and educational opportunities it offered. I know several who regret being lured in by name brands.</p>
<p>The problem is that the top college for a student varies from student to student, and suggesting that any college is somehow superior to another, in my opinion, misses the point. Congratulations to those schools that are standing up to the silly "reputational survey" and mad props to students and parents who are ignoring prestige in favor of finding a good fit.</p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/24/61-colleges-boycott-u-s-news-rankings/">61 colleges boycott U.S. News rankings</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=ai5lmS7OvpEU&amp;refer=exclusive>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/24/61-colleges-boycott-u-s-news-rankings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/947702/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/24/61-colleges-boycott-u-s-news-rankings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>College</category><category>Newsweek</category><category>university</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Newspaper wrap-up 6-27-07: iPhone making news just ahead of release]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/27/newspaper-wrap-up-6-27-07-iphone-making-news-just-ahead-of-rele/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/27/newspaper-wrap-up-6-27-07-iphone-making-news-just-ahead-of-rele/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/27/newspaper-wrap-up-6-27-07-iphone-making-news-just-ahead-of-rele/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/luv/" rel="tag">Southwest Airlines (LUV)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dj/" rel="tag">Dow Jones and Co (DJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/iphone/" rel="tag">iPhone</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jwn/" rel="tag">Nordstrom, Inc (JWN)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/fly-logo-(aol).gif" /></a>MAJOR PAPERS:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>The <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118290879387149494.html?mod=todays_us_page_one "><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a> (subscription required) highlighted the struggles of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/southwest-airlines-co/luv/nys">Southwest Airlines</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/southwest-airlines-co/luv/nys">LUV</a>), a company that is dealing with the competition catching up to them in a tough competitive environment. CEO Gary Kelly said, "The threat to our future is real."</li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup Incorporated</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) is expected to pay $700M for Automated Trading Desk, an electronic trading firm, reported the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118290532458949392.html?mod=home_whats_news_us "><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a>.</li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dow-jones-and-company-inc/dj/nys">Dow Jones and Company Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dow-jones-and-company-inc/dj/nys">DJ</a>) have reached a preliminary understanding for a way to safeguard the editorial independence of the <em>Wall Street Journal</em> and the other Dow Jones publications, which had been the key road block to a deal, reported the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118159730593931701-search.html?KEYWORDS=news+corp%2C+dow+jones&amp;COLLECTION=wsjie/6month "><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a>.</li>
    <li>Walter Mossberg, the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118289311361649057-search.html?KEYWORDS=Apple%2C+mossberg&amp;COLLECTION=wsjie/6month "><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a> technology guru, spent two weeks testing <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple Inc's</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) new iPhone, and said it was "a beautiful and breakthrough handheld computer."</li>
</ul>
<strong>OTHER PAPERS:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>Also regarding the iPhone, according to <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19444948/site/newsweek/page/0/"><em>Newsweek</em></a>, Steve Jobs said of the high expectations for the iPhone, "I think we're going to blow away the expectations."</li>
    <li>The <a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/06272007/business/nordstrom_deals_chain_business_suzanne_kapner.htm "><em>New York Post</em></a> has learned that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nordstrom-inc/jwn/nys">Nordstrom Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nordstrom-inc/jwn/nys">JWN</a>) has apparently reached a deal to sell its Faconnable chain to a Lebanese private equity firm. </li>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/27/newspaper-wrap-up-6-27-07-iphone-making-news-just-ahead-of-rele/">Newspaper wrap-up 6-27-07: iPhone making news just ahead of release</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 27 Jun 2007 09:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/27/newspaper-wrap-up-6-27-07-iphone-making-news-just-ahead-of-rele/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/927682/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/27/newspaper-wrap-up-6-27-07-iphone-making-news-just-ahead-of-rele/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>apple</category><category>automated trading desk</category><category>AutomatedTradingDesk</category><category>c</category><category>citigroup</category><category>dj</category><category>dow jones</category><category>DowJones</category><category>iphone</category><category>jwn</category><category>luv</category><category>new york post</category><category>news corp</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>newspaper</category><category>newsweek</category><category>NewYorkPost</category><category>nordstrom</category><category>nws</category><category>ny post</category><category>NyPost</category><category>paper</category><category>periodical</category><category>review</category><category>southwest</category><category>wall street journal</category><category>WallStreetJournal</category><category>walt mossberg</category><category>WaltMossberg</category><category>wsj</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 09:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Couric and Imus kick CBS when it's down]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/11/couric-and-imus-kick-cbs-when-its-down/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/11/couric-and-imus-kick-cbs-when-its-down/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/11/couric-and-imus-kick-cbs-when-its-down/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pd/" rel="tag">Phelps Dodge (PD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/spls/" rel="tag">Staples Inc (SPLS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dj/" rel="tag">Dow Jones and Co (DJ)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation-cl-b/cbs/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CBS Corp</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation-cl-b/cbs/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CBS</a>) has its hands full with sinning talent.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-washington-post-company/wpo/nys">The Washington Post Co.'s</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-washington-post-company/wpo/nys">WPO</a>) <em><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18046837/site/newsweek/ ">Newsweek</a></em> reports that CBS Evening News anchor, Katie Couric -- who is dating a <a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/04112007/gossip/pagesix/katies_new_guy_pagesix_.htm">33-year-old cougar</a> -- plagiarized in her <em>Notebook</em> segment from a story by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dow-jones-and-company-inc/dj/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Dow Jones &amp; Co.'s</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dow-jones-and-company-inc/dj/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">DJ</a>) <em>Wall Street Journal</em> [subscription required] reporter Jeffrey Zaslow's <em><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117391084682537392.html?mod=Letters">March 15th Moving On</a></em> column. <em>Newsweek</em> alleges that Couric's segment on the decline of libraries copied Zaslow's article in nine places. In response, CBS fired the <em>Notebook</em> segment producer. </p>
<p>And earlier in the week, Don Imus, whose radio program is carried by CBS Radio, <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/04/09/national/main2662385.shtml?source=mostpop_story">suspended his show</a> for two weeks after his comments on the Rutgers women's basketball team. So far Imus's remarks have <a href="http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/ticker/article.aspx?Feed=AP&amp;Date=20070411&amp;ID=6718276&amp;Symbol=CBS">cost his show two advertisers</a> -- <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Procter &amp; Gamble Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">PG</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/staples-inc/spls/nas">Staples, Inc</a>. (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/staples-inc/spls/nas">SPLS</a>). If enough cancellations follow his show will be dropped altogether.</p>
<p>I don't watch any CBS programming and I would avoid CBS stock. With a P/E of 17.5 and earnings expected to grow 13% in 2008 to $2.00, CBS trades at a Price/Earnings to Growth (PEG) ratio of 1.35. This seems expensive for a company whose $14.3 billion in sales have shrunk at a five year compound annual rate of -9.2% and whose net profit margin of 10.3% trails the industry average by three percentage points.</p>
<p>My view: skip Couric, Imus, and CBS stock. </p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em>Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</em></a><em>, a management consulting and venture capital firm. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em>teaches management at Babson College</em></a><em> and edits </em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em>The Cohan Letter</em></a><em>. He has no financial interest in CBS, Dow Jones, Procter &amp; Gamble, Staples or Washington Post securities.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/11/couric-and-imus-kick-cbs-when-its-down/">Couric and Imus kick CBS when it's down</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 11 Apr 2007 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18046837/site/newsweek/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/11/couric-and-imus-kick-cbs-when-its-down/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/871766/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/11/couric-and-imus-kick-cbs-when-its-down/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>don imus</category><category>DonImus</category><category>katie couric</category><category>KatieCouric</category><category>media</category><category>media ethics</category><category>MediaEthics</category><category>newsweek</category><category>plagarism</category><category>wall street journal</category><category>WallStreetJournal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple after the bell 10/16/06: Chris Pirillo expects Vista issues to double Apple's market share]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/16/apple-after-the-bell-10-16-06-chris-pirillo-expects-vista-issue/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/16/apple-after-the-bell-10-16-06-chris-pirillo-expects-vista-issue/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/16/apple-after-the-bell-10-16-06-chris-pirillo-expects-vista-issue/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/snipshot_1hn0s9063u.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" />Apple Computer, Inc (NASDAQ: AAPL) ended the day at $75.40, up 38 cents or 0.51% up over last Friday's close. The stock is experiencing optimism over Wednesday's earnings report, which is expected <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/oct2006/tc20061016_951371.htm?campaign_id=bier_tcs.g3a.rssmn1016">to be positive</a> with 1.5 million computers sold, at least 25-30% growth expected by some, and solid iPod sales and growth.<br /><br />In an interesting twist, well known PC-enthuisist Chris Pirillo says that <a href="http://www.computerpoweruser.com/editorial/article.asp?article=articles/archive/c0611/44c11/44c11.asp&amp;guid=8CF5E5CB35CB42E1857F6F42970E2A2C">Windows Vista will double Apple's market-share</a> as a result of inconsistent user interface, long delays, and an expensive price. And with analysts and investors being over-focused on iPods as a stock health indicator, Apple investors would no doubt welcome computer sales being more of a focus if they are long term investors.<br /><br />Meanwhile, speaking of the iPod's stature, <a href="http://msnbc.msn.com/id/15262121/site/newsweek?www.reghardware.co.uk">Steve Jobs appears unfazed</a> by the Zune's social sharing features. Yes, you can wirelessly hand over a song that will play three times and then lock up. But Jobs doesn't think anyone will be more impressed than by just grabbing headphones and listening in on a cool song, pointing out how cumbersome it is to get the feature to work. "By the time you've gone through all that, the girl's got up and left!" Jobs said in the Newsweek interview. "You're much better off to take one of your earbuds out and put it in her ear. Then you're connected with about two feet of headphone cable."<br /><br />Sometimes the simpler solution isn't the technologically complicated one...<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/16/apple-after-the-bell-10-16-06-chris-pirillo-expects-vista-issue/">Apple after the bell 10/16/06: Chris Pirillo expects Vista issues to double Apple's market share</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/16/apple-after-the-bell-10-16-06-chris-pirillo-expects-vista-issue/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/685823/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/16/apple-after-the-bell-10-16-06-chris-pirillo-expects-vista-issue/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>chris pirillo</category><category>ChrisPirillo</category><category>ipod</category><category>newsweek</category><category>steve jobs</category><category>SteveJobs</category><category>vista</category><category>zune</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tobias Buckell]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Kaplan University/Newsweek MBA gets an F-]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/26/kaplan-university-newsweek-mba-gets-an-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/26/kaplan-university-newsweek-mba-gets-an-f/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/26/kaplan-university-newsweek-mba-gets-an-f/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hpq/" rel="tag">Hewlett-Packard (HPQ)</a></p><p><img height="240" alt="kaplan" hspace="4" src="http://static.flickr.com/120/253428782_44b55cf0c5_m.jpg" width="232" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.kaplan.com">Kaplan University</a>, which is a long-time provider of education, is launching a new MBA program. It's called <a href="http://www.topnewsweekmba.com ">Kaplan University/Newsweek M.B.A</a>.</p>
<p>That's right. It's not a mistake. </p>
<p>You see, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com">The Washington Post</a> Company (NYSE:WPO) owns both Kaplan and <a href="http://www.newsweek.com"><em>Newsweek</em></a>. So, why not make an attempt at synergy and combine the two?</p>
<p>OK, the big question is: What does <em>Newsweek</em> have to do with business? </p>
<p>I'm not sure. In fact, MBA students are probably puzzled, too. It's impossible to know how many business professors assign <em>Newsweek</em> as required reading, but it is probably a low number. Also, it's probably safe to say there have been few Nobel prize winners in Economics from <em>Newsweek</em> - much less articles that have changed the landscape of business, even considering the magazine's recent juicy story on the boardroom drama at <a href="http://www.hp.com">HP</a>.</p>
<p>In fact, it would probably be embarrassing to say to friends and potential employers that you spent lots of money getting your MBA at Kaplan University/<em>Newsweek</em>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/26/kaplan-university-newsweek-mba-gets-an-f/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Kaplan University/Newsweek MBA gets an F-</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/26/kaplan-university-newsweek-mba-gets-an-f/">Kaplan University/Newsweek MBA gets an F-</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/26/kaplan-university-newsweek-mba-gets-an-f/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/675238/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/26/kaplan-university-newsweek-mba-gets-an-f/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dumb</category><category>dumb ideas</category><category>DumbIdeas</category><category>ideas</category><category>Kaplan</category><category>kaplan newsweek mba</category><category>KaplanNewsweekMba</category><category>marketing</category><category>MBA</category><category>Newsweek</category><category>Washington Post</category><category>WashingtonPost</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Inc's cost cutting taboo]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/07/time-warners-cost-cutting-taboo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/07/time-warners-cost-cutting-taboo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/07/time-warners-cost-cutting-taboo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p><img id="vimage_1" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/09/312633431.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />One of the issues that <a title="http://finance.google.com/finance?cid=655621" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner Inc. (NYSE:TWX)</a> faces as it tries to improve margins is the bias against cutting editorial costs at well-known media properties. The Grahams face the same issue at The Washington Post Company (NYSE:WPO) and the Sulzbergers are up against the same wall at The New York Times Company (NYSE:NYT). Fortunately for the <em>Washington Post</em>, most of its revenues now come from its online education businesses, like Kaplan. Lucky for them.</p>
<p>For decades big, widely distributed editorial operations have been viewed as something of a public trust. Even some of the network news operations fell into this category until Bill Paley died. Then Larry Tisch came in and cut with a vengeance. Entire editorial bureaus were closed.</p>
<p>From the time that Henry Luce and his partners started <em>Time Magazine</em> in 1923 until <em>Life Magazine</em> was closed in 1972, Time, Inc. did not shutter any of its major publications. If Luce had not died in 1967, <em>Life</em> may have survived.</p>
<p>At companies where editorial standards are a bit more "flexible," cutting is no big deal. Dean Singleton has made a career of buying large city dailies and cutting their costs, including newsrooms, to the bone. He has purchased newspapers in markets as large as Dallas, Denver, and Oakland. If the papers do not make money, he closes them.</p>
<p><em>Time Magazine</em>, <em>Newsweek</em>, <em>The New York Times</em>, and <em>The Washington Post</em> are institutions with lives that are measured as much in reputation as they are in economic success. And it is probably less popular with the press when their brethren are let go than it is with, say, auto workers. And there is nothing amiss with looking out for your own.</p>
<p>It is almost inevitable that Parsons &amp; Co. are looking at the number of bureaus that Time has, and the number of senior editors, as well as the number of writers at <em>People</em> and <em>Sports Illustrated</em>. Why? Because these magazines, perhaps with the exception of the gossip found in <em>People</em>, are no longer the primary source of news. They may have been twenty years ago, or even ten. But that rationale has lost its teeth.</p>
<p>While it is hard to say that anything is inevitable, the clash of the dropping margins at Time, Inc. and the large editorial staffs at the magazine is coming. And if shareholder pressure keeps up, it may come soon.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/07/time-warners-cost-cutting-taboo/">Time Inc's cost cutting taboo</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 07 Sep 2006 14:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/07/time-warners-cost-cutting-taboo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/665298/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/07/time-warners-cost-cutting-taboo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>new york times</category><category>newsweek</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>restructuring</category><category>time inc</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeInc</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>washington post</category><category>WashingtonPost</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 14:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Old media saving itself from Google News]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/01/old-media-saving-itself-from-google-news/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/01/old-media-saving-itself-from-google-news/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/01/old-media-saving-itself-from-google-news/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p><p><a title="Photo Sharing" href="http://www.taulli.com"><img height="204" alt="newsweek" hspace="4" src="http://static.flickr.com/65/204345626_f8c0b3ff86_m.jpg" width="240" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /></a></p>
<p>Like millions of people, I visit <a href="http://www.google.com">Google</a> every day - and often visit <a href="http://news.google.com">Google News</a>. Then again, I write quite a bit and want to know what's already out there . As for Google News, it effectively aggregates huge amounts of content, ranging from blogs to major publications. Hey, it even collects posts from <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks.com</a> (I also did a recent <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/06/extra-extra-google-won-t-kill-newspapers/">piece</a> on Google News for BloggingStocks.com).</p>
<p>For example, today I visited Google News to check out the stories on, interestingly enough, a new company that wants to help traditional publications deal with the threat from Google News. The company is called <a href="http://www.inform.com">Inform</a>. It has a group of talented employees - including linguists, taxonomists, mathematicians and computer scientists - that has developed algorithms to better categorize online content (such as by tagging things like products, persons, stock quotes and so on).</p>
<p>A group of traditional publications, such as <a href="http://www.newsweek.com"><em>Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive</em></a>, <a href="http://www.nysun.com/"><em>The New York Sun</em></a>, <a href="http://www.newsok.com"><em>NewsOK.com</em></a>, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/"><em>The Huffington Post</em></a>, <a href="http://www.thedeal.com"><em>The Deal LLC</em></a>, and NameMedia, are using it to provide more content options for its readers. So, if you go to an article, you will see in-depth links to the publication's own archive, as well as outside content. The idea is that readers have more reasons to go to the sites of traditional publications.</p>
<p>I talked to Julian Steinberg, who is with Inform: "Google News broke new ground and showed consumers the power of topical surfing for news. Other agile, fast moving new media firms (<a href="http://www.topix.net">topix.net</a>, <a href="http://www.digg.com">Digg</a>) followed and made topical surfing the expected behavior. Traditional media unfortunately took too long and allowed a 'walled garden' thinking to reign. Soon the whole paradigm changed with a large percent of users coming in sideways and leaving sideways. Traditional media has started to realize that they need to co-opt this disruptive technology or risk ceding news' online point of entry to search engines."</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/01/old-media-saving-itself-from-google-news/">Old media saving itself from Google News</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 01 Aug 2006 19:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/01/old-media-saving-itself-from-google-news/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/649584/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/01/old-media-saving-itself-from-google-news/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Google</category><category>Google News</category><category>GoogleNews</category><category>Inform</category><category>Newsweek</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 19:30:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
