<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[The riskiest mutual funds of 2007]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/28/the-riskiest-mutual-funds-of-2007/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/28/the-riskiest-mutual-funds-of-2007/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/28/the-riskiest-mutual-funds-of-2007/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/funds/" rel="tag">Mutual Funds</a></p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/nerstu/497754382/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/497754382_86734550db_m.jpg" /></a>When it comes to mutual funds, there are the good, the bad and the ugly. Let's press past the obvious Eastwood-esque reference there and ask a question: how did your funds do this year? I'm not talking about returns -- I'm talking about returns minus sales costs minus transaction costs minus (insert misc. fee here) minus tax consequences of company stock turnover inside the fund.<br /><br />You see, there is a lot more to "total returns" that most mutual fund hawkers like to advertise to lure in new investors. Total returns is a meaningless figure -- what counts is the return that your bottom line sees after<strong><em> everything</em></strong> is accounted for. So, then, what were the worst funds to own in 2007? That list probably spans a few thousand funds, but let's <a href="http://www.kiplinger.com/columns/fundwatch/archive/2007/fundwatch1227.htm">look at a short list</a> here.<br /><br />Clipper (<a href="http://CFIMX">CIMFX</a>) -- through December 17th -- lost 2% year-to-date (YTD). Clipper has a huge 48% share of stocks in the financial market, which, as we all know, really has done pretty poorly in the back half of the year due to subprime write-offs and risky decisions that bombed and caused the ouster of many CEOs in this sector.<br /><br />How about Oakmark Select (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/oakmark-select-fund-the-class-i/oaklx/nmf?tabs=quotesandnews">OAKLX</a>)? Down 14% YTD on the back of including 15% of net assets in mortgage lender (and hurting) Washington Mutual. eggs in one basket? You bet. Those are just two funds with overconcentrations in industries that had exposure to huge risks -- and were hit hard -- this year. How are your funds doing?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/28/the-riskiest-mutual-funds-of-2007/">The riskiest mutual funds of 2007</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 28 Dec 2007 13:13:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.kiplinger.com/columns/fundwatch/archive/2007/fundwatch1227.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/28/the-riskiest-mutual-funds-of-2007/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1072462/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/28/the-riskiest-mutual-funds-of-2007/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bad mutual funds</category><category>BadMutualFunds</category><category>CIMFX</category><category>Clipper</category><category>fund performance</category><category>FundPerformance</category><category>mutual funds</category><category>MutualFunds</category><category>Oakmark Select</category><category>OakmarkSelect</category><category>OAKX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 13:13:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
