<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Anglo American explains move to OTC]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/anglo-american-explains-move-to-otc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/anglo-american-explains-move-to-otc/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/anglo-american-explains-move-to-otc/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aauky/" rel="tag">Anglo American (AAUKY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nasdaq/" rel="tag">NASDAQ</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/08/aauk-anglo-american-logo.jpg" alt="" />Last week shareholders were surprised to find that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anglo-american-plc/aauky/nao">Anglo American</a> (OTC: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anglo-american-plc/aauky/nao">AAUKY</a>) had moved from the Nasdaq to the OTC "pink sheets" with no press release, news or explanation on the company website (see <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/03/aauk-now-you-see-it-now-you-dont/" title="View AAUK: Now you see it, now you don't on BloggingStocks">AAUK: Now you see it, now you don't</a>).</p>
<p>After a few inquiries to the company, I received notice that the site had been updated with <a href="http://www.angloamerican.co.uk/aa/investors/shareserv/adrs/">a full explanation</a>. What I learned is that the Nasdaq listing was not done by Anglo but by several banks that held <em>unsponsored</em> ADR shares and were trading the stock.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/anglo-american-explains-move-to-otc/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Anglo American explains move to OTC</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/anglo-american-explains-move-to-otc/">Anglo American explains move to OTC</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/anglo-american-explains-move-to-otc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19127690/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/anglo-american-explains-move-to-otc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAUKY</category><category>American depository receipts</category><category>Anglo American</category><category>OTC</category><category>over the counter</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AAUK: Now you see it, now you don't]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/03/aauk-now-you-see-it-now-you-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/03/aauk-now-you-see-it-now-you-dont/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/03/aauk-now-you-see-it-now-you-dont/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aauky/" rel="tag">Anglo American (AAUKY)</a></p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/08/aauk-anglo-american-logo.jpg" />This morning I looked up Anglo American ADR and could not find it. What I found was: <em>"No listing under this symbol"</em>. I checked another financial site and nothing. I check the company web site and I found under investor information USD NASDAQ 0.00. Now it was getting very strange.<br /><br />There was no news anywhere, how could that be?<br /><br />It turns out that the company is now listed on the "pink sheets", "over the counter" as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anglo-amern-plc-ads/aauky/nao">Anglo American PLC ADS</a> (OTC: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anglo-amern-plc-ads/aauky/nao">AAUKY</a>). There was no news Friday, no news over the weekend, no news this morning, no information under the old symbol, the new symbol or the web site, and no broker knew why there was a change, just that it happened.<em><span class="symbol"></span></em><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/03/aauk-now-you-see-it-now-you-dont/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>AAUK: Now you see it, now you don't</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/03/aauk-now-you-see-it-now-you-dont/">AAUK: Now you see it, now you don't</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 03 Aug 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/03/aauk-now-you-see-it-now-you-dont/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19117787/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/03/aauk-now-you-see-it-now-you-dont/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAUK</category><category>AAUKY</category><category>Anglo American</category><category>AngloAmerican</category><category>OTC</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Credibility and transparency in the Pink Sheets market?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/14/credibility-and-transparency-in-the-pink-sheets-market/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/14/credibility-and-transparency-in-the-pink-sheets-market/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/14/credibility-and-transparency-in-the-pink-sheets-market/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nextbigthing/" rel="tag">Next Big Thing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nok/" rel="tag">Nokia Corp. (NOK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bp/" rel="tag">BP p.l.c. ADS (BP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bhp/" rel="tag">BHP Billiton Ltd ADR (BHP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nasdaq/" rel="tag">NASDAQ</a></p>While stocks listed on the over-the-counter bulletin board (<a href="http://otcbb.com/">OTCBB</a>) and the <a href="http://pinksheets.com/pink/index.jsp">Pink Sheets,</a> a privately held daily quote service (not a stock exchange), are known to be lacking in SEC filings, liquidity, and easily obtainable financial information (some have been delisted from major exchanges so brokerages actually make customers sign additional forms recognizing the added risk if they choose to trade in this niche), they actually are fully audited. In the last few years, Pink OTC Markets Inc., which owns these quotation systems, has aimed to bring extended transparency to this little known niche through the introduction of <a href="http://otcqx.com/otcqx/">OTCQX</a>.<br /> <br />The OTCQX, now a few years old and with 55 stocks listed, is a premium area of Pink Sheets -- which is littered with over 9,000 companies, most of which are penny stocks that don't trade very many shares or very often -- that provides a new level of disclosure not required outside of any major stock exchange, such as the AMEX, NYSE, or NASDAQ.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/14/credibility-and-transparency-in-the-pink-sheets-market/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Credibility and transparency in the Pink Sheets market?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/14/credibility-and-transparency-in-the-pink-sheets-market/">Credibility and transparency in the Pink Sheets market?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/14/credibility-and-transparency-in-the-pink-sheets-market/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1516265/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/14/credibility-and-transparency-in-the-pink-sheets-market/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>addyy</category><category>amx</category><category>arflyy</category><category>bhp</category><category>bngpy</category><category>bp plc</category><category>BpPlc</category><category>inthenews</category><category>nok</category><category>OTC</category><category>OTCBB</category><category>OTCQX</category><category>pink sheets</category><category>PinkSheets</category><category>rhhby</category><category>rio</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daleela Farina]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Calvin Coolidges of capitalism: Is quieter better?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/22/the-calvin-coolidges-of-capitalism-is-quieter-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/22/the-calvin-coolidges-of-capitalism-is-quieter-better/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/22/the-calvin-coolidges-of-capitalism-is-quieter-better/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sec-filings/" rel="tag">SEC Filings</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/from-the-boards/" rel="tag">From the Boards</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a></p><p><img height="261" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/460px-calvin_coolidge_photo_portrait_head_and_shoulders.jpg" width="200" align="right" vspace="4" />While the shareholders and board of directors at at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/whole-foods-market-inc/wfmi/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Whole Foods Market</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/whole-foods-market-inc/wfmi/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">WFMI</a>) wish CEO John Mackey would pipe down, and the board at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/overstock-com-inc-del/ostk/nas">Overstock.com</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/overstock-com-inc-del/ostk/nas">OSTK</a>), <a href="http://garyweiss.blogspot.com/2007/06/does-overstockcom-have-board-of.html">if it exists</a>, seems indifferent to CEO Patrick Byrne's Regulation FD-flouting rants, Herb Greenberg has a nice WSJ column (subscription required) on <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118498297100973699.html">executives who take a different approach</a>. To borrow a line from Calvin Coolidge, these companies have decided that nothing they don't say will do them any harm.</p>
<p>The piece talks about a few thinly traded, closely held companies, several of which list their shares on the OTC markets, which tend to be highly illiquid and provide little exposure. These companies don't hold regular conference calls and don't present at investor conferences, but some have actually provided investors with very strong returns.</p>
<p>The highlight of the column is a company called <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/expeditors-international-of-washington-inc/expd/nas?from=lookup">Expeditors International</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/expeditors-international-of-washington-inc/expd/nas?from=lookup">EXPD</a>), a transportation and logistics business. Expediters responds to shareholder inquires by filing 8-Ks with the SEC providing pithy, and often bitchy, responses to questions. The latest series is <a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/746515/000110465907049863/a07-17148_18k.htm">one of the strangest 8-Ks I have ever seen</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/22/the-calvin-coolidges-of-capitalism-is-quieter-better/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Calvin Coolidges of capitalism: Is quieter better?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/22/the-calvin-coolidges-of-capitalism-is-quieter-better/">The Calvin Coolidges of capitalism: Is quieter better?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 22 Jul 2007 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/22/the-calvin-coolidges-of-capitalism-is-quieter-better/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/945972/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/22/the-calvin-coolidges-of-capitalism-is-quieter-better/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>8-Ks</category><category>Calvin Coolidge</category><category>CalvinCoolidge</category><category>EXPD</category><category>Expeditors</category><category>Herb Greenberg</category><category>HerbGreenberg</category><category>John Mackey</category><category>JohnMackey</category><category>OSTK</category><category>OTC</category><category>Overstock.com</category><category>Patrick Byrne</category><category>PatrickByrne</category><category>Regulation FD</category><category>SEC</category><category>shareholder comtempt</category><category>ShareholderComtempt</category><category>WFMI</category><category>Whole Foods</category><category>WholeFoods</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AMEX mulls IPO]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/25/amex-mulls-ipo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/25/amex-mulls-ipo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/25/amex-mulls-ipo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a></p><p>While the takeover battle between the NASDAQ and the London Stock Exchange rages on, the lesser-known American Stock Exchange (AMEX) has hired Morgan Stanley to begin the process of demutualization, presumably setting the stage for an initial public offering (IPO). The IPO comes after numerous exchanges/trading companies have gone public in recent years including the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, New York Stock Exchange and, regrettably, Refco.</p>
<p>The AMEX is definitely the least-respected of the major exchanges. I once mentioned a company to an older stock broker friend and asked him what he thought of the company. The first thing he said was "Ah! The AMEX! That's where bad stocks go to die." The AMEX will also continue to face competition for listing from the OTC market and even the Pink Sheets, where it is taking steps toward greater transparency and scrutiny of companies, perhaps setting the stage for a better reputation. The Pink Sheets is widely known as a great place to find penny stock pump and dumps.</p>
<p>In addition, the high costs of Sarbanes-Oxley will, in my opinion, lead more companies to seek private funding, leading to fewer IPO's in the future. The AMEX may do great, but it's not an IPO I'll be buying into.</p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/25/amex-mulls-ipo/">AMEX mulls IPO</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:49:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.thestreet.com/_googlen/newsanalysis/wallstreet/10334780.html?cm_ven=GOOGLEN&amp;cm_cat=FREE&amp;cm_ite=NA>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/25/amex-mulls-ipo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/742483/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/25/amex-mulls-ipo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>amex</category><category>ipo</category><category>major exchanges</category><category>MajorExchanges</category><category>otc</category><category>pink sheets</category><category>PinkSheets</category><category>sarbanes-oxley</category><category>stock exchanges</category><category>StockExchanges</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:49:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[OTCBB and the Pink Sheets... Why would I like them?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/12/otcbb-and-the-pink-sheets-why-would-i-like-them/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/12/otcbb-and-the-pink-sheets-why-would-i-like-them/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/12/otcbb-and-the-pink-sheets-why-would-i-like-them/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gettingstarted/" rel="tag">Getting Started</a></p><p><img alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/12/texture2.jpg" align="right" />Over the counter (OTC) stocks interest me but the <a href="http://www.pinksheets.com/index.jsp">pink sheets</a> appear to be too risky. What is it I find most intriguing about OTC stocks? They allow a person with more nerve than money to break into the stock market game. Pink sheets and penny stocks are historically the most risk prone investment vehicles. They're kind of like a trip to the casino. Going in there requires the investor to be prepared for the real possibility of leaving some money behind. OTC stocks on the other hand, provide a noticeably bit more security and some are actually stocks from very solid companies that are just unable to meet the price and volume requirements of the large stock exchanges.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.otcbb.com/">The OTC Bulletin Board</a> is the place to find out what OTC stocks are available. There are surprises on the OTC with some business names we all recognize. Others, I've never heard of. There's one thing for sure, it's a lively place where there is money to be made. If someone is entering the sport of stock trading, the OTC BB can be an excellent place to get started in my opinion.</p>
<p>OTC stocks require some special investment knowledge. Knowledge not in the sense of special analytical skills, but in the sense of having the desire to pick some winners and the patience to do some foot work. Making prudent investments in OTC companies, requires learning about them. There must be willingness to do some research about potential prospects. The more research done, the higher quality the knowledge will be. The trick to the sport is to find the companies that are ready to go upward. If the timing is right, then the possibility of actually making some dollars exists. </p>
<p>I'll be writing more about getting started with stock trading. Taking things easy may be my best bet. It's been an awfully long fourth quarter this year but let's just hang in there.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/12/otcbb-and-the-pink-sheets-why-would-i-like-them/">OTCBB and the Pink Sheets... Why would I like them?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/12/otcbb-and-the-pink-sheets-why-would-i-like-them/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/716998/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/12/otcbb-and-the-pink-sheets-why-would-i-like-them/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>OTC</category><category>OTC BB</category><category>OtcBb</category><category>penny stocks</category><category>PennyStocks</category><category>pink sheets</category><category>PinkSheets</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:34:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
