<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Barron's slams hedge fund Och-Ziff]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/17/barrons-slams-hedge-fund-och-ziff/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/17/barrons-slams-hedge-fund-och-ziff/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/17/barrons-slams-hedge-fund-och-ziff/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bx/" rel="tag">Blackstone Group L.P (BX)</a></p><p><img style="WIDTH: 131px; HEIGHT: 100px" height="100" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/och-ziff.jpg" width="131" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Last Wednesday, the mega hedge fund Och-Ziff <a href="http://www.dealprofiles.com/ipoprofile.htm?CompanyID=53">went public</a>. But investors were jittery and the stock has already dropped 12.5% since its debut.</p>
<p>Well, it may drop even more -- that is, according to <a href="http://online.barrons.com/article/SB119526432503896559-search.html?KEYWORDS=Och-Ziff&amp;COLLECTION=barrons/6month">a piece in Barron's</a> [a paid service]. In fact, the author, Andrew Bary, calls the company's investment performance an example of "mediocrity."</p>
<p>The current market value of Och-Ziff is about $10.8 billion, which means it is trading at about 18 times earnings. So, on its face, this seems reasonable, right?</p>
<p>Well, you need to make some adjustments. First of all, there is the favorable tax treatment (which may undergo some changes in Congress).</p>
<p>Next, Och-Ziff relies primarily on hefty fees for its investment performance. But, what if the firm has a down year? It could be a big hit to the bottom line.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/17/barrons-slams-hedge-fund-och-ziff/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Barron's slams hedge fund Och-Ziff</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/17/barrons-slams-hedge-fund-och-ziff/">Barron's slams hedge fund Och-Ziff</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 17 Nov 2007 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/17/barrons-slams-hedge-fund-och-ziff/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1042485/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/17/barrons-slams-hedge-fund-och-ziff/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Blackstone</category><category>BX</category><category>FIG</category><category>Fortress</category><category>Hedge Funds</category><category>Och-Ziff</category><category>OZ Master Fund</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
