<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Southwestern Energy: A low-profile gem]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/southwestern-energy-a-low-profile-gem/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/southwestern-energy-a-low-profile-gem/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/southwestern-energy-a-low-profile-gem/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/indigoprime.jpg" alt="" />Natural gas/oil play Southwestern Energy's (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/southwestern-energy-company/swn/nys">SWN</a>) uptrend has been milder-than-expected, but investors should view it as an opportunity to scoop-up shares, so I'm reiterating my buy rating for the company, first recommended <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/30/southwestern-energy-is-in-an-oil-natural-gas-sweet-spot/#continued">on June 5, 2009</a> at a price of $42.38. Here's why: <br /><br />Southwestern is a cream-of-the-crop play, due to its projected, large increases in production for the immediate years ahead, and its low-cost producer status. Hence, when combined with likely rising natural gas prices, Southwestern should experience large increases cash flow and earnings: SWN is one of the best, low-profile energy companies in the U.S.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/southwestern-energy-a-low-profile-gem/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Southwestern Energy: A low-profile gem</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/southwestern-energy-a-low-profile-gem/">Southwestern Energy: A low-profile gem</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/southwestern-energy-a-low-profile-gem/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19273684/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/southwestern-energy-a-low-profile-gem/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>oil companies</category><category>OilCompanies</category><category>southwestern energy</category><category>SouthwesternEnergy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[ConocoPhillips barely tops second-quarter expectations]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/29/conocophillips-barely-tops-second-quarter-expectations/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/29/conocophillips-barely-tops-second-quarter-expectations/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/29/conocophillips-barely-tops-second-quarter-expectations/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cop/" rel="tag">ConocoPhillips (COP)</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/cop-conocophillips-logo.jpg" />Oil firm <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/conocophillips/cop/nys">ConocoPhillips</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/conocophillips/cop/nys">COP</a>) reported second-quarter earnings of 87 cents per share this morning, barely edging the <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=avUMC4O_g5Fw">consensus estimate</a> calling for 85 cents per share. Despite topping the consensus estimate, the results fell well short of last year's same-quarter earnings of $3.50 per share. <br /><br />Quarterly revenue totaled $35.4 billion, which was less than half of the $71.4 billion earned a year ago. CEO and chairman Jim Mulva noted <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/conocophillips-reports-second-quarter-earnings-of-1-3-billion-or-0-87-per-share/rfid236570773?channel=pf">in the company's press release</a>, "we delivered solid operational results during the quarter," despite lower commodity prices and margins in the second quarter.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/29/conocophillips-barely-tops-second-quarter-expectations/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>ConocoPhillips barely tops second-quarter expectations</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/29/conocophillips-barely-tops-second-quarter-expectations/">ConocoPhillips barely tops second-quarter expectations</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/29/conocophillips-barely-tops-second-quarter-expectations/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19112962/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/29/conocophillips-barely-tops-second-quarter-expectations/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ConocoPhillips</category><category>cop</category><category>inthenews</category><category>oil companies</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil sector</category><category>OilCompanies</category><category>OilPrices</category><category>OilSector</category><category>quarterly results</category><category>QuarterlyResults</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[No one will feel sorry for Exxon Mobil]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/no-one-will-feel-sorry-for-exxon-mobil/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/no-one-will-feel-sorry-for-exxon-mobil/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/no-one-will-feel-sorry-for-exxon-mobil/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/exxon-mobil-corporation/xom/nys"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/exxonmobil.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Exxon Mobil Corp. </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/exxon-mobil-corporation/xom/nys">XOM</a>), whose huge profits have made it one of the most vilified companies in America, was brought down to earth today after <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/exxon-mobil-corporation-announces/rfid98741662">posting disappointing earnings.<br /></a><br />Net income at the world's largest oil company rose 17% to $10.9 billion, or $2.03 per share, from $9.3 billion, or $1.62 per share, a year earlier. Revenue rose 34% to $116.9 billion. Analysts had expected profit of $2.13 on revenue of $124.4 billion, according to Thomson Financial. Shares of the company fell.<br /><br />Just because oil prices remain above $100 per barrel doesn't necessarily mean everything is going Exxon's way. For one thing, high oil prices resulted in "significantly lower" refining margins, which pushed down downstream earnings by $746 million to $1.16 billion. Lower margins also pushed down profit in Exxon's chemical business by $208 million to $1.03 billion. Moreover, spending on capital and exploration projects soared 30% to $5.5 billion "as we continued to actively invest in projects to bring additional crude oil, natural gas and finished products to market."<br /><br />The problem is that's proving to be difficult. For one thing, production at the company's oil wells dropped as did natural gas production in the Middle East, The U.S., Canada, South America and Asia. This is happening as surging demand from the developing world is keeping oil prices at record levels. Exxon is "having trouble raising production, and that's not a good sign,'' Leeb Capital Management's Stephen Leeb told <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aHOj1ZS7H2Hs&amp;refer=home">Bloomberg News.</a>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/no-one-will-feel-sorry-for-exxon-mobil/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>No one will feel sorry for Exxon Mobil</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/no-one-will-feel-sorry-for-exxon-mobil/">No one will feel sorry for Exxon Mobil</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 01 May 2008 15:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/exxon-mobil-corporation-announces/rfid98741662>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/no-one-will-feel-sorry-for-exxon-mobil/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1183387/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/no-one-will-feel-sorry-for-exxon-mobil/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>energy</category><category>energy stocks</category><category>EnergyStocks</category><category>Featured</category><category>Hillary Clinton</category><category>HillaryClinton</category><category>inthenews</category><category>oil companies</category><category>oil exploration</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil production</category><category>OilCompanies</category><category>OilExploration</category><category>OilPrices</category><category>OilProduction</category><category>XOM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 15:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Gasoline prices hit new record high!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/04/gasoline-prices-hit-new-record-high/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/04/gasoline-prices-hit-new-record-high/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/04/gasoline-prices-hit-new-record-high/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/middle-east/" rel="tag">Middle East</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/gasoline.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />With the recent surge in oil prices, it should come as no surprise that we are getting hit hard at the gas pumps, and according to AAA, prices moved to a <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/04/04/news/economy/gas_prices/index.htm?postversion=2008040406">new record high last night</a> of $3.303 for a gallon of regular unleaded.<br /><br />This is the second day in a row that gas prices have set new highs, after jumping more than a penny overnight. At these current levels, prices are now a massive 22% higher than they were this time last year. <br /><br />Congress has been trying to get to the bottom of the situation, and earlier this week they heard <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/01/oil-executives-at-congress-today-defending-tax-breaks-explaini/">testimony from executives</a> of 5 of the world's largest oil companies regarding the current price explosion. Some analysts are predicting that Congress may have to step in to take some action to help combat the record-high prices by making the purchase of high-risk oil contracts tougher to do, which could lead to lower prices. Whether or not that takes place remains to be seen.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/04/gasoline-prices-hit-new-record-high/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Gasoline prices hit new record high!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/04/gasoline-prices-hit-new-record-high/">Gasoline prices hit new record high!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 04 Apr 2008 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/04/gasoline-prices-hit-new-record-high/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1158626/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/04/gasoline-prices-hit-new-record-high/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>$110 oil</category><category>$110Oil</category><category>bad news</category><category>BadNews</category><category>featured</category><category>gas</category><category>gas prices</category><category>gasoline</category><category>GasPrices</category><category>inthenews</category><category>oil</category><category>oil companies</category><category>oil prices</category><category>OilCompanies</category><category>OilPrices</category><category>record highs</category><category>RecordHighs</category><category>tourism</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oil companies to face new taxes]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/06/oil-companies-to-face-new-taxes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/06/oil-companies-to-face-new-taxes/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/06/oil-companies-to-face-new-taxes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/taxes.jpg" />In the past, when I have written about oil prices, at least once a week I get a comment that we should start to put <a href="http://elections-o.channel.aol.com/topnews/articles/_a/house-approves-taxes-on-oil-companies/n20070805033309990001">heavier taxes on oil companies</a>... well, those of you that are of that belief will be delighted to hear that over the weekend Congress decided to do just that!<br /><br />On Saturday the House of Representatives approved an additional $16 billion in taxes to be imposed on big oil, while at the same time giving billions of dollars in breaks to companies engaged in renewable energy and conservation efforts. The House hopes that passing this legislation will show that it is "turning to the future", but not everyone is pleased to see this pass.<br /><br />Many Republicans (not surprisingly) were opposed to the passing of these new taxes. They claim that the advocates for the new taxes are not taking into consideration America's need to increase its output of domestic oil, natural gas and coal.<br /><br />In an attempt to get more interest in the use of renewable energy, the House also passed a bill that will require any investor-owned electric utilities company to generate 15 percent of its electricity from renewable energy. Not all electric companies were in favor of this action, stating that it would result in increased prices for consumers that live in areas that do not have abundant wind energy (which is currently the preferred method for renewable energy). Opponents to this argue insist that this will not be the case, and instead we will see an increase in investments in these renewable energy supplies.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/06/oil-companies-to-face-new-taxes/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oil companies to face new taxes</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/06/oil-companies-to-face-new-taxes/">Oil companies to face new taxes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 06 Aug 2007 16:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/06/oil-companies-to-face-new-taxes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/959124/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/06/oil-companies-to-face-new-taxes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>oil companies</category><category>OilCompanies</category><category>renewable energy</category><category>RenewableEnergy</category><category>republicans</category><category>taxes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 16:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[A more environment friendly Exxon?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/12/a-more-environment-friendly-exxon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/12/a-more-environment-friendly-exxon/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/12/a-more-environment-friendly-exxon/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a></p>ExxonMobil has long been frowned upon for its stance on global warming, but recently the company has been trying to put forward a more environmentally friendly image. The most recent step to cleaning up its act comes as the oil giant has <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/exxon-joining-talks-on-greenhouse-gas/20070112111709990001">joined talks sponsored by Resources for the Future</a>, a nonprofit organization from Washington, D.C. aimed at coming up with ideas on how to better regulate greenhouse emissions.<br /><br />For the last 7 years American companies have not had to pay too much attention to the impact of their activities on the environment under the current Bush Administration, which has refused the idea of mandatory reduction in emissions. In fact, Bush went so far as to to back out of the Kyoto pact soon after being elected. The Kyoto pact puts restrictions on greenhouse gases.<br /><br />This all may change now the Democrats have taken over control of the Congress and have expressed that climate control is on their list of priorities. <br /><br />ExxonMobil is one of the last big companies to deny that global warming is taking place and many environmentalists are hoping that if ExxonMobil can begin to help address global warming that many more will follow in it's footsteps. Last year ExxonMobil decided to stop the private funding of the Competitive Enterprise Institute which has long advocated limited federal regulation of industries. <br /><br />While ExxonMobil has not formally come out and announced a new opinion on global warming, things are definitely looking better for the world's largest traded company.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/12/a-more-environment-friendly-exxon/">A more environment friendly Exxon?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/12/a-more-environment-friendly-exxon/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/735084/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/12/a-more-environment-friendly-exxon/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>deregulation</category><category>environment</category><category>global warming</category><category>GlobalWarming</category><category>oil companies</category><category>OilCompanies</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[ExxonMobil tops this year's Fortune Global 500 list]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/25/exxonmobil-tops-this-years-fortune-global-500-list/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/25/exxonmobil-tops-this-years-fortune-global-500-list/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/25/exxonmobil-tops-this-years-fortune-global-500-list/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a></p><img id="vimage_2" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/09/exxonmobil092506.gif" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />ExxonMobil (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/exxon-mobil-corporation/xom/nys">XOM</a>) has become the king of the hill on this year's <a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/global500/2006/index.html">Fortune Global 500</a> list. With the run up oil has had over the last couple of years (at least up until the last 3 weeks) it should come as no surprise that this years top 10 consists of 5 oil companies. Last year's top company, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WMT</a>) didn't fall very far, and managed to follow XOM in the second place position.<br /><br />How did ExxonMobil manage to get to the top? Easy... the company posted $339.9 billion in revenues with $36.1 billion in profits. Wal-Mart came in with $315.6 billion in revenues with $11.2 billion profits. A good deal of last year's explosion in oil prices came as a result of damage from hurricane Katrina which crippled much of the Gulf's oil supplies. So far this year we have not been hit with any major hurricanes which has led in a big part to the recent sell off seen in oil.<br /><br />Other oil stocks in the top ten this year:<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/25/exxonmobil-tops-this-years-fortune-global-500-list/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>ExxonMobil tops this year's Fortune Global 500 list</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/25/exxonmobil-tops-this-years-fortune-global-500-list/">ExxonMobil tops this year's Fortune Global 500 list</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:18:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/25/exxonmobil-tops-this-years-fortune-global-500-list/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/674473/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/25/exxonmobil-tops-this-years-fortune-global-500-list/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Chevron</category><category>Exxon Mobil</category><category>ExxonMobil</category><category>Fortune 500</category><category>Fortune500</category><category>OIH</category><category>oil companies</category><category>OilCompanies</category><category>Wal-Mart</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:18:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
