<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[DailyFinance today: GM tops Lexus in quality, oil tops $50, did Fed act in nick of time, and Manhattan deflation rolls on]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/19/dailyfinance-today-gm-tops-lexus-in-quality-oil-tops-50-did/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/19/dailyfinance-today-gm-tops-lexus-in-quality-oil-tops-50-did/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/19/dailyfinance-today-gm-tops-lexus-in-quality-oil-tops-50-did/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a></p><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" style="border-width: 0pt;">
    <tbody>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top" align="left"><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/03/19/deflation-rolls-on-as-manhattan-apartment-sales-see-huge-drop/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/03/most-traveled-cities-200mk122107_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a></td>
            <td><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/03/19/deflation-rolls-on-as-manhattan-apartment-sales-see-huge-drop/">Deflation rolls on as Manhattan apartment sales see huge drop</a> </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top" align="left"><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/03/19/looks-like-the-fed-acted-just-in-the-nick-of-time/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/03/bernanke_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a></td>
            <td><a rel="bookmark" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/03/19/looks-like-the-fed-acted-just-in-the-nick-of-time/">Looks like the Fed acted just in the nick of time</a> </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top" align="left"><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/03/19/oil-tops-50-on-belief-that-feds-actions-will-stimulate-economy/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/03/oil_rigs_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a></td>
            <td> <a rel="bookmark" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/03/19/oil-tops-50-on-belief-that-feds-actions-will-stimulate-economy//">Oil tops $50 on belief that Fed's actions will stimulate economy</a> </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top" align="right">
            <div align="right"><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/03/19/buick-and-jaguar-top-lexus-in-quality/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/03/buick_enclave_thumbnail.jpg" /></a></div>
            </td>
            <td> <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/03/19/buick-and-jaguar-top-lexus-in-quality/">Rare good news for GM as Buick tops Lexus in quality</a> </td>
        </tr>
    </tbody>
</table><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/19/dailyfinance-today-gm-tops-lexus-in-quality-oil-tops-50-did/">DailyFinance today: GM tops Lexus in quality, oil tops $50, did Fed act in nick of time, and Manhattan deflation rolls on</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/19/dailyfinance-today-gm-tops-lexus-in-quality-oil-tops-50-did/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1493177/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/19/dailyfinance-today-gm-tops-lexus-in-quality-oil-tops-50-did/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>buick</category><category>Fed</category><category>lexus</category><category>manhattan real estate</category><category>ManhattanRealEstate</category><category>oil price</category><category>OilPrice</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tobias Buckell]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[With oil down 25%, why do gas and other prices stay so high?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/03/with-oil-down-25-why-do-gas-and-other-prices-keep-rising/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/03/with-oil-down-25-why-do-gas-and-other-prices-keep-rising/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/03/with-oil-down-25-why-do-gas-and-other-prices-keep-rising/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dow/" rel="tag">Dow Chemical (DOW)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gt/" rel="tag">Goodyear Tire and Rubber (GT)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/falling-oil.gif" alt="" />Since July 11, the price of oil has fallen 25% from $147 to $110. This has been terrible news for holders of energy stocks -- which have nosedived. But for people who need to fill up their tanks, prices at the pump remain relatively elevated -- having fallen about 10% (I remember paying $4.11 at the peak and now pay $3.69 a gallon). <br /></p>
<p>Meanwhile, the <em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/03/business/03commodities.html">New York Times</a></em> reports that companies using oil in their products are keeping their prices high despite the oil price drop. These companies seem to be acting in unison to raise prices -- suggesting there is not enough competition in their markets.</p>
<p>Which companies are raising prices still? Those who believe they can get away with it as they try to recoup the lost profit resulting from the recent increase in the price of oil -- which is an important raw material in their products..</p>
<ul>
    <li>
    <div><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys">Procter &amp; Gamble</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys">PG</a>) increased prices to retailers <strong>up 7% to 10%</strong> "for items made with ingredients derived from oil to 'recover costs already incurred,'" according to a <em>Times</em> interview with its spokesman.</div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-dow-chemical-company/dow/nys">Dow Chemical</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-dow-chemical-company/dow/nys">DOW</a>) <strong>raised prices by 50%</strong> for the oil-based raw materials that go into diapers and polystyrene. It "does not want to give up those increases until the company recovers its old profit margins since '[its] prices continue to lag [its] cost increases,''" according to a <em>Times</em> interview with its spokesman. </div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goodyear-tire-and-rubber-company/gt/nys">Goodyear Tire and Rubber</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goodyear-tire-and-rubber-company/gt/nys">GT</a>) has <strong>raised tire prices by 15%</strong> and is "still making synthetic rubber tires from oil-based feed stocks bought at relatively high prices more than three months ago [and it] 'could not consider canceling the price increase until it knew whether oil prices were going to stay down,'" according to a <em>Times</em> interview with its spokesman.</div>
    </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/03/with-oil-down-25-why-do-gas-and-other-prices-keep-rising/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>With oil down 25%, why do gas and other prices stay so high?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/03/with-oil-down-25-why-do-gas-and-other-prices-keep-rising/">With oil down 25%, why do gas and other prices stay so high?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 03 Sep 2008 08:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/03/business/03commodities.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/03/with-oil-down-25-why-do-gas-and-other-prices-keep-rising/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1302913/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/03/with-oil-down-25-why-do-gas-and-other-prices-keep-rising/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>commodities</category><category>dow chemical</category><category>dow chemical dow</category><category>DowChemical</category><category>DowChemicalDow</category><category>featured</category><category>gasoline</category><category>goodyear</category><category>oil price</category><category>oil prices</category><category>OilPrice</category><category>OilPrices</category><category>procter and gamble</category><category>ProcterAndGamble</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 08:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Does $100 a barrel oil help Toyota surpass GM as the world's auto leader?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/03/does-100-a-barrel-oil-help-toyota-surpass-gm-as-the-worlds-aut/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/03/does-100-a-barrel-oil-help-toyota-surpass-gm-as-the-worlds-aut/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/03/does-100-a-barrel-oil-help-toyota-surpass-gm-as-the-worlds-aut/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tm/" rel="tag">Toyota Motor Corp. (TM)</a></p><p>Back in April 2005, <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/apr2005/nf20050426_9234.htm">Eric Wahlgren</a> of <em>Business Week</em>, wrote about the then unthinkable prospect of oil hitting $100 a barrel. In that article I suggested that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">Toyota Motor Corporation (ADR)</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">TM</a>) might benefit if oil prices rose. That's because it seemed to be taking the lead in making hybrid vehicles. Even though its Prius only accounted for a small portion of its sales, I thought it would keep pushing ahead of its U.S. competitors due to its higher quality, higher prices, and lower costs.</p>
<p>Today, according to <em><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22488803/">The Associated Press</a></em>, Toyota surpassed <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Ford Motor Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">F</a>) as the U.S.'s second largest vehicle manufacturer. Ford has been in second place since 1931. And the global sales tallies are yet to be completed, however, <em><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22490691/">The Associated Press</a></em> reports that Toyota -- which estimates that it made 9.51 million vehicles in 2007 will surpass <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">General Motors Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">GM</a>)'s total of 9.284 million vehicles for 2007.</p>
<p>Since April 26, 2005 when the Wahlgren article was published, Toyota stock has risen 47% while General Motors stock is down 11% and Ford has fallen 35%. Concerns about Toyota overtaking U.S. auto manufacturers' global lead have persisted for about 25 years. Despite occasional efforts by GM and Ford to stop Toyota's inexorable advance, Toyota is now the world leader. </p>
<p>And its prescient response to $100 a barrel oil is helping Toyota to extend its lead.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is president of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em>Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</em></a><em>. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em>teaches management at Babson College</em></a><em> and edits </em><em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2008/01/cohan-letter-up-18-in-2007.html">The Cohan Letter</a></em><em>. He has no financial interest in the securities mentioned.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/03/does-100-a-barrel-oil-help-toyota-surpass-gm-as-the-worlds-aut/">Does $100 a barrel oil help Toyota surpass GM as the world's auto leader?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 03 Jan 2008 18:42:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/03/does-100-a-barrel-oil-help-toyota-surpass-gm-as-the-worlds-aut/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1076669/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/03/does-100-a-barrel-oil-help-toyota-surpass-gm-as-the-worlds-aut/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>eric wahlgren</category><category>EricWahlgren</category><category>fuel efficient cars</category><category>FuelEfficientCars</category><category>oil price</category><category>OilPrice</category><category>prius</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 18:42:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Multi-billion dollar oil lease "error" by Dept of Interior deliberate?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/04/multi-billion-dollar-oil-lease-error-by-dept-of-interior-delib/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/04/multi-billion-dollar-oil-lease-error-by-dept-of-interior-delib/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/04/multi-billion-dollar-oil-lease-error-by-dept-of-interior-delib/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a></p><img id="vimage_1" height="181" alt="Oil Rig" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/08/539205_sittin_by_the_dock_of_the_bay.jpg" width="250" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />U.S. Department of the Interior officials <a href="http://articles.news.aol.com/business/_a/multi-billion-dollar-oil-error-may-have/20060803174209990008?cid=403">may have deliberately removed provisions from offshore drilling contracts, giving oil companies a multibillion-dollar windfall</a>, two Republican congressmen are charging. And the government may have already lost $2 billion in royalties owed and may lose another $8 billion yet on the term left on the 1990's leases, according to the Reps. Tom Davis of Va. and Darryl Issa of Calif.<br /><br />The congressmen are demanding more information on the leases, which are for deep sea oil drilling operations, from the Secretary for the Interior. The Interior's inspector general has also opened an investigation.<br /><br />Evidently, a provision in the leases that would have paid substantially increased royalties in the event of soaring gas and oil prices<em> --</em> such as we are experiencing right now -- <em>was left out of the contracts. </em>And the congressmen believe there's indication that the omission was no mistake. They have "the impression" that Interior has been less than open -- by withholding emails and other evidence of the transaction. <br /><br />The oil industry has certainly been embarrassed quarter after quarter of late, by news of <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2006/01/30/news/companies/exxon_earns/">unprecedented profits</a>. Nah, I take that back, I don't know whether or not the oil industry is capable of feeling embarrassment at anything.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/04/multi-billion-dollar-oil-lease-error-by-dept-of-interior-delib/">Multi-billion dollar oil lease "error" by Dept of Interior deliberate?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 04 Aug 2006 09:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://articles.news.aol.com/business/_a/multi-billion-dollar-oil-error-may-have/20060803174209990008?cid=403>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/04/multi-billion-dollar-oil-lease-error-by-dept-of-interior-delib/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/650545/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/04/multi-billion-dollar-oil-lease-error-by-dept-of-interior-delib/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Darryl Issa</category><category>DarrylIssa</category><category>Department of the Interior</category><category>DepartmentOfTheInterior</category><category>oil lease error</category><category>oil price</category><category>OilLeaseError</category><category>OilPrice</category><category>Representative Tom Davis</category><category>RepresentativeTomDavis</category><category>windfall profits</category><category>WindfallProfits</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Canfield]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 09:31:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
