<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Oprah to pull the plug in 2011]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/oprah-to-pull-the-plug-in-2011/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/oprah-to-pull-the-plug-in-2011/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/oprah-to-pull-the-plug-in-2011/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a></p><p><img alt="Oprah Winfrey " hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/oprah-winfrey.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Oprah Winfrey, arguably the most powerful woman in entertainment (if not the world in general), is <a href="http://www.cnbc.com//id/34050986" target="_blank">preparing to pack</a> her luxurious bags. She's announced that in 2011, after a quarter-century of favorite things and heartfelt interviews, "The Oprah Winfrey Show" will be no more. The last program is scheduled for Sept. 9, 2011. One can only imagine who might be her guests. <br /><br />In syndication across the country, Oprah's eponymous program is the top-rated U.S. daytime show (take that, <em>Days of Our Lives!</em>), with an average viewership of 7.1 million this year. <br /><br />While not entirely unexpected, the news is likely a bit of a blow to CBS Corporation (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys" target="_blank">CBS</a>), as its CBS Television Distribution arm syndicates the program. Additionally, Walt Disney (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys" target="_blank">DIS</a>) might feel the sting of an Oprah departure as Disney-owned ABC is the primary network that airs the show. And will it impact O, Oprah's monthly magazine published by the Heart Corporation? To say nothing of all of the manic women in the audience who long for a chance at one of Oprah's favorite things. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/oprah-to-pull-the-plug-in-2011/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oprah to pull the plug in 2011</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/oprah-to-pull-the-plug-in-2011/">Oprah to pull the plug in 2011</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cnbc.com//id/34050986>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/oprah-to-pull-the-plug-in-2011/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19247263/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/oprah-to-pull-the-plug-in-2011/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ABC</category><category>CBS</category><category>DIS</category><category>Discovery Communications</category><category>DiscoveryCommunications</category><category>entertainment</category><category>featured</category><category>Harpo</category><category>inthenews</category><category>oprah winfrey</category><category>oprah winfrey show</category><category>OprahWinfrey</category><category>OprahWinfreyShow</category><category>television</category><category>TV</category><category>Walt disney</category><category>WaltDisney</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can Electronic Arts capitalize on the Wii Fit craze?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/can-electronic-arts-capitalize-on-the-wii-fit-craze/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/can-electronic-arts-capitalize-on-the-wii-fit-craze/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/can-electronic-arts-capitalize-on-the-wii-fit-craze/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/erts/" rel="tag">Electronic Arts (ERTS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/atvi/" rel="tag">Activision Inc (ATVI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ntdoy/" rel="tag">Nintendo (NTDOY)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/erts-electronic-arts-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/electronic-arts-inc/erts/nas">Electronic Arts</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/electronic-arts-inc/erts/nas">ERTS</a>) hasn't been doing as well as its colleague <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/activision-blizzard-inc/atvi/nas">Activision Blizzard</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/activision-blizzard-inc/atvi/nas">ATVI</a>). Indeed, when it comes to the numbers, Activision, which is responsible for franchise hits <em>Guitar Hero</em> and <em>Call of Duty</em>, has its competitor beat.</p>
<p>But EA recently released an exercise system for the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nintendo-co-ltd-unsp-adr/ntdoy/nao">Nintendo</a> (OTC: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nintendo-co-ltd-unsp-adr/ntdoy/nao">NTDOY</a>) Wii that was highlighted at <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/30809934/site/14081545?__source=aol|headline|quote|text|&amp;par=aol">CNBC.com</a>. The piece mentions the enormous marketing presence that is supporting <em><a href="http://www.easportsactive.com/product.action">EA Sports Active</a></em>. You get a couple accessories with the software: a leg strap that is used like a controller to interact with the screen, and a resistance band to increase the effectiveness of the workout. Oprah Winfrey's trainer apparently assisted EA with the design. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/can-electronic-arts-capitalize-on-the-wii-fit-craze/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Can Electronic Arts capitalize on the Wii Fit craze?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/can-electronic-arts-capitalize-on-the-wii-fit-craze/">Can Electronic Arts capitalize on the Wii Fit craze?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 26 May 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cnbc.com/id/30809934/site/14081545?__source=aol|headline|quote|text|&amp;par=aol>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.easportsactive.com/product.action>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/can-electronic-arts-capitalize-on-the-wii-fit-craze/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1555832/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/can-electronic-arts-capitalize-on-the-wii-fit-craze/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>activision blizzard</category><category>ActivisionBlizzard</category><category>ATVI</category><category>Call of Duty</category><category>CallOfDuty</category><category>EA</category><category>ea sports active</category><category>EaSportsActive</category><category>electronic arts</category><category>ElectronicArts</category><category>ERTS</category><category>featured</category><category>Guitar Hero</category><category>GuitarHero</category><category>nintendo</category><category>NTDOY</category><category>Oprah Winfrey</category><category>OprahWinfrey</category><category>Resident Evil</category><category>ResidentEvil</category><category>Wii</category><category>wii fit</category><category>WiiFit</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bear Stearns going too cheap, Oprah Winfrey should buy it]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/bear-stearns-going-too-cheap-oprah-winfrey-should-buy-it/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/bear-stearns-going-too-cheap-oprah-winfrey-should-buy-it/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/bear-stearns-going-too-cheap-oprah-winfrey-should-buy-it/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bsc/" rel="tag">Bear Stearns Cos (BSC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="Oprah Winfrey " src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/oprah-winfrey.jpg" />At a mere $276 million, celebrity talk-show host and entertainment billionaire Oprah Winfrey could afford to buy <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-bear-stearns-companies-inc/bsc/nys">Bear Stearns</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-bear-stearns-companies-inc/bsc/nys">BSC</a>), which closed Tuesday at $5.91 per share and keeps on climbing to over $6.50 a share in morning trading. The story alone and the associated publicity would be worth at least that. Furthermore, she could at least make an offer and demand a meeting with the Federal Reserve Board to discuss the issue.</p>
<p>If her offer was rejected, she would still be able to generate millions of dollars of publicity and perhaps she might want to acquire the asset, in particular if the Fed is going to protect the acquirer from potential losses. She could really become an international mogul, the likes of which has not been seen. We all know that Oprah wants to do good. She is so giving, this could be the ultimate.</p>
<p>I could just see the headlines: <em>Oprah Winfrey takes on </em><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jp-morgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys?tabs=quotesandnews"><em>JP Morgan Chase</em></a><em> (NYSE: </em><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jp-morgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys?tabs=quotesandnews"><em>JPM</em></a><em>) and the Federal Reserve to rescue John Q. Public.</em></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/bear-stearns-going-too-cheap-oprah-winfrey-should-buy-it/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bear Stearns going too cheap, Oprah Winfrey should buy it</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/bear-stearns-going-too-cheap-oprah-winfrey-should-buy-it/">Bear Stearns going too cheap, Oprah Winfrey should buy it</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:52:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nypost.com/seven/03192008/business/bear_hunting_102536.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/bear-stearns-going-too-cheap-oprah-winfrey-should-buy-it/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1143871/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/bear-stearns-going-too-cheap-oprah-winfrey-should-buy-it/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bear stearns</category><category>BearStearns</category><category>BSC</category><category>chase</category><category>featured</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>George Lucas</category><category>GeorgeLucas</category><category>Jimmy Cayne</category><category>JimmyCayne</category><category>Joseph Lewis</category><category>JosephLewis</category><category>jp morgan</category><category>JPM</category><category>JpMorgan</category><category>jpmorganchase</category><category>Michael Jordan</category><category>MichaelJordan</category><category>oprah</category><category>oprah winfrey</category><category>oprah's big give</category><category>Oprah'sBigGive</category><category>OprahWinfrey</category><category>Skywalker Ranch</category><category>Steven Spielberg</category><category>StevenSpielberg</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:52:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oprah's enlightenment quest hits a technological snag]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/oprahs-enlightenment-quest-hits-a-technological-snag/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/oprahs-enlightenment-quest-hits-a-technological-snag/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/oprahs-enlightenment-quest-hits-a-technological-snag/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xmsr/" rel="tag">XM Satellite Radio (XMSR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/books/" rel="tag">Books</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="Oprah Winfrey " src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/oprah-winfrey.jpg" />If Oprah Winfrey can cast a spell that turns thousands of housewives into literature critics and transformed underdog Barack Obama into the possible Democratic nominee for president, getting her followers to embrace an esoteric New Age philosophy should be a snap. Her latest endeavor, though, is going to need more bandwidth.
<p>The talk show queen is getting into the business of enlightenment, offering a 10-week Web seminar with self-help guru Eckhart Tolle, author of "A New Earth," an amalgam of Buddhist, Christian and Islamic influences, according to<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/life/people/2008-03-02-oprah-tolle_N.htm"> USA Today</a>. The book also happens to be the latest pick of Oprah's Book Club. </p>
<p>Last night's first webcast was one of the largest events in the history of the internet, attracting more than 500,000 people. "Unfortunately, some of our users experienced delays in viewing the webcast," according to a <a href="http://www2.oprah.com/about/press/releases/200803/press_releases_20080304.jhtml">statement from Oprah's Harpo Productions</a>. "We are working to identify the specific causes for the problems experienced and will work diligently to rectify them." </p>
<p> Seekers of enlightenment be forewarned, the path outlined by "A New Earth" isn't an easy one.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/oprahs-enlightenment-quest-hits-a-technological-snag/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oprah's enlightenment quest hits a technological snag</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/oprahs-enlightenment-quest-hits-a-technological-snag/">Oprah's enlightenment quest hits a technological snag</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/oprahs-enlightenment-quest-hits-a-technological-snag/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1131153/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/oprahs-enlightenment-quest-hits-a-technological-snag/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>A New Earth</category><category>ANewEarth</category><category>Eckhart Tolle</category><category>EckhartTolle</category><category>Oprah</category><category>Oprah Winfrey</category><category>Oprah's Book Club</category><category>Oprah'sBookClub</category><category>OprahWinfrey</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oprah Winfrey to get her own network!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/16/oprah-winfrey-to-get-her-own-network/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/16/oprah-winfrey-to-get-her-own-network/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/16/oprah-winfrey-to-get-her-own-network/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a></p><p>Oprah Winfrey is <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/16/arts/television/16oprah.html?ref=business">teaming up</a> with Discovery Communications to create a new network, cleverly titled OWN, the Oprah Winfrey Network.</p>
<p>The network will not carry her trademark Oprah Winfrey Show to start, but since Ms. Winfrey has the option of ending her deal for the show with the networks in 2010 and 2011, she could move the show there then.</p>
<p>Winfrey told reporters that "Eventually that will happen, we hope". Discovery will own half of the network, and Winfrey's production company will own the other half.</p>
<p>Oprah Winfrey moving to her own cable network would, if it does happen, send shock waves through the television industry and create additional problems for the already beleaguered networks. Similar to Radiohead's decision to forgo the major labels and release their album on their own, such a move would send a clear message to the networks: Cable is ubiquitous enough that top stars don't need you: We can do it ourselves and keep a bigger chunk of the money.</p>
<p>It's too soon to know what will happen. The new network could flop, but given Oprah's popularity, I seriously doubt that will happen.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/16/oprah-winfrey-to-get-her-own-network/">Oprah Winfrey to get her own network!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/16/arts/television/16oprah.html?ref=business>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/16/oprah-winfrey-to-get-her-own-network/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1088171/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/16/oprah-winfrey-to-get-her-own-network/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Discovery</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Oprah Winfrey</category><category>OprahWinfrey</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rural groups lobby for Sirius/XM merger]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/aint-that-america-rural-groups-lobby-for-sirius-xm-merge/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/aint-that-america-rural-groups-lobby-for-sirius-xm-merge/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/aint-that-america-rural-groups-lobby-for-sirius-xm-merge/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xmsr/" rel="tag">XM Satellite Radio (XMSR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/siri/" rel="tag">Sirius Satellite Radio (SIRI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a></p><img width="180" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="180" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/sirius-siri-logo.gif" alt="" />This week, <a href="http://www.orbitcast.com/archives/five-rural-groups-unite-to-defend-siriusxm-merger.html" target="_blank">another group added their support</a> to a merger between the two satellite radio companies: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xm-satellite-radio-holdings-inc/xmsr/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">XM Satellite Radio Holdings </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xm-satellite-radio-holdings-inc/xmsr/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">XMSR</a>)'s and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sirius-satellite-radio-inc/siri/nas">Sirius Satellite Radio Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sirius-satellite-radio-inc/siri/nas">SIRI</a>). A quintet of organizations representing rural Americans presented a letter to Federal Communications Commission (FCC) head Jonathan Adelstein. An excerpt from <a href="http://www.siriusmerger.com/uploads/Rural_Support_letter_FINAL.pdf" target="_blank">the letter</a> read: <br /><br /><em>"This merger is clearly in the best interest of rural consumers because it would allow a combined company to expand upon its existing services with increased efficiencies and at the same time provide rural listeners with more diverse programming and lower pricing ... [the merger] will make satellite radio a more viable option for rural consumers ... even in the most remote areas." </em><br /><br />Indeed, a combination of the two companies could bring all 4 major sports, Oprah and Stern, and John Cougar Mellencamp and Bruce Springsteen tunes, virtually commercial free, to households distanced from terrestrial broadcast towers. <br /><br />Originally announced on February 19, 2007, this partnership continues to be closely scrutinized by the FCC as well as the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB). The latter organization effectively represents the combined company's would-be competition, weakening the argument that the satellite-radio merger stifles competition. But I digress before I slip into a monopoly wormhole. <br /><br /><em>Beth Gaston Moon is an analyst at <a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/commentary/optionbytes.aspx">Schaeffer's Investment Research</a></em>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/aint-that-america-rural-groups-lobby-for-sirius-xm-merge/">Rural groups lobby for Sirius/XM merger</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 24 Oct 2007 19:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.orbitcast.com/archives/five-rural-groups-unite-to-defend-siriusxm-merger.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/aint-that-america-rural-groups-lobby-for-sirius-xm-merge/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1019252/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/aint-that-america-rural-groups-lobby-for-sirius-xm-merge/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>acquisitions</category><category>FCC</category><category>Federal Communications Commission</category><category>FederalCommunicationsCommission</category><category>howard stern</category><category>HowardStern</category><category>mergers</category><category>NAB</category><category>National Association of Broadcasters</category><category>NationalAssociationOfBroadcasters</category><category>oprah winfrey</category><category>OprahWinfrey</category><category>satellite radio</category><category>SatelliteRadio</category><category>SIRI</category><category>XMSR</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 19:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can Oprah Winfrey redeem Michael Vick?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/29/can-oprah-winfrey-redeem-michael-vick/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/29/can-oprah-winfrey-redeem-michael-vick/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/29/can-oprah-winfrey-redeem-michael-vick/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img height="133" alt="Oprah Winfrey" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/about_photoid_top.gif" width="200" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Suspended Atlanta Falcons quarterback Michael Vick's best chance at public redemption lies with Oprah Winfrey. At least that's the conclusion of <em>Detroit Free Press</em> columnist <a href="http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070829/COL08/708290344/1081">Drew Sharp</a>, who makes a convincing argument that "now that pop culture dictates news judgment, it's only appropriate that a pop culture diva quite possibly holds the key to Michael Vick's NFL future."</p>
<p>Vick should take Sharp's advice. If Vick goes on Oprah, his handlers would no doubt encourage him to cry, talk about "finding Jesus" and encourage young people to make smart decisions. Unfortunately for Vick, the road to redemption starts with the talk show queen. Vick will have to spend the next few months apologizing until the American public is sick of seeing his face.</p>
<p>The question for Vick's handlers is where to go after Oprah. </p>
<p>Will he try to reach NFL fans through <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Walt Disney Co.</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) ESPN cable network or <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">News Corp.</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">NWS</a>) Fox?</p>
<p>What about the morning shows? You can bet that ABC, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">General Electric Co.</a>'s (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys?tabs=quotesandnews"> GE</a>) NBC and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation-cl-b/cbs/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CBS Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation-cl-b/cbs/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CBS</a>) would kill to land an interview with the disgraced athlete. "Dateline" and "60 Minutes" are probably working on stories about the evils of dog fighting. The story also continues to be the gift that keeps on giving for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner Inc.</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) CNN, Fox News channel, and MSNBC.</p>
<p>But I am not sure that all of the apologizing in the world can save Vick's NFL career. People understand that young, rich athletes misbehave and occasionally break the law. But Vick's behavior was so heinous that it defies explanation.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/29/can-oprah-winfrey-redeem-michael-vick/">Can Oprah Winfrey redeem Michael Vick?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 29 Aug 2007 11:42:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070829/COL08/708290344/1081>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/29/can-oprah-winfrey-redeem-michael-vick/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/976652/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/29/can-oprah-winfrey-redeem-michael-vick/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ABC</category><category>atlanta falcons</category><category>AtlantaFalcons</category><category>broadcast journalism</category><category>BroadcastJournalism</category><category>CBS</category><category>CNN</category><category>DIS</category><category>featured</category><category>FOX NEWS</category><category>FoxNews</category><category>GE</category><category>journalism</category><category>michael vick</category><category>MichaelVick</category><category>NBC</category><category>nfl</category><category>NWS</category><category>oprah winfrey</category><category>OprahWinfrey</category><category>tv</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 11:42:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oprah enters the wild world of brick-and-mortar retail]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/oprah-enters-the-wild-world-of-brick-and-mortar-retail/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/oprah-enters-the-wild-world-of-brick-and-mortar-retail/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/oprah-enters-the-wild-world-of-brick-and-mortar-retail/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xmsr/" rel="tag">XM Satellite Radio (XMSR)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/harpo.jpg"  alt="" />For those of you who just aren't sated by the daily one-hour program, the monthly magazine, occasional feature films and made-for-TV movies, and the radio content available at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xm-satellite-radio-holdings-inc/xmsr/nas">XM Satellite Radio</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xm-satellite-radio-holdings-inc/xmsr/nas">XMSR</a>), you'll be relieved to hear that a <a href="http://www.suntimes.com/entertainment/people/444927,CST-NWS-oprah27.article" target="_blank">one-stop shop for all things Oprah</a> is in the works. <br /><br />Oprah Winfrey's privately held company, Harpo Inc., released a statement indicating that construction has started on a store carrying Oprah merchandise. The boutique will be located catty-corner from the Harpo Studios building in downtown Chicago and will be one story and 4,500 square feet. Many details, including an opening date, have yet to be worked out. <br /><br />The queen of the entertainment world already sells some products through an online store. Oprah fans can pick up a $14 iPod cover with the Oprah logo, DVDs, and African apparel and artwork. The Chicago Sun-Times reports that these and other Oprah-related merchandise will also be available in the retail store. Know a co-worker or friend that's expecting? The $36 'O Baby' <a href="http://boutique.oprah.com/product/show/6177" target="_blank">velour jogging suit</a> could be the perfect gift. <em><br /><br /><em>Beth Gaston Moon is an analyst at </em><a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/"><em>Schaeffer's Investment Research</em></a><em>.</em></em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/oprah-enters-the-wild-world-of-brick-and-mortar-retail/">Oprah enters the wild world of brick-and-mortar retail</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 28 Jun 2007 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.suntimes.com/entertainment/people/444927,CST-NWS-oprah27.article>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/oprah-enters-the-wild-world-of-brick-and-mortar-retail/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/928619/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/oprah-enters-the-wild-world-of-brick-and-mortar-retail/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Harpo</category><category>Oprah Winfrey</category><category>OprahWinfrey</category><category>retailing</category><category>xm satellite radio</category><category>XmSatelliteRadio</category><category>XMSR</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Random House offers refund for "A Million Little Pieces"]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/random-house-offers-refund-for-a-million-little-pieces/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/random-house-offers-refund-for-a-million-little-pieces/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/random-house-offers-refund-for-a-million-little-pieces/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/books/" rel="tag">Books</a></p><img width="240" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="195" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/frey.jpg" />Random House, a division of the privately held media conglomerate Bertelsmann AG, is <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/culture/2007/05/18/2007-05-18_authors_23m_lie.html">offering compensation</a> to any reader claiming to be "duped" by James Frey's memoir, <em>A Million Little Pieces</em>. <br /><br />Frey's story was a scandal that broke in January of last year. The author's ostensibly non-fiction book described, in excruciating <span style=""></span><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial;"></span> detail, his miserable existence within an alcohol and drug-addled haze. Toe-curling details include a three-month stint in jail, an anesthesia-free trip to the dentist, and time in rehab. <br /><br />Published in April 2003, the book hit the best-seller list more than two years later, after Oprah Winfrey named it her September 2005 book club selection. But Frey's ride of success wasn't long; in January 2006, it was revealed that the "memoir" contained outright fabrications. (Essentially, Frey is the Milli Vanilli of modern American literature). Readers who bought <em>A Million Little Pieces </em>before January 26, 2006 (around the time Frey confessed that his penned story wasn't entirely true) are now entitled to a refund from the publisher. <br /><br />Those who bought the hardcover copy will receive as much as $23.95; ones who bought the book in paperback will get a maximum refund of $14.95. The entire program is expected to cost Random House $2.35 million. The publisher's decision, approved by a Manhattan Federal Judge, is expected to resolve several lawsuits already filed across the country by disgruntled readers. <br /><br />While Frey's fabrications are certainly reprehensible, the fact remains that <em>A Million Little Pieces </em>reportedly helped countless readers who were struggling with their own addictions. I can't help but wonder how Frey's real story might have gone if he'd pitched his book as one "inspired by true events" rather than a completely factual "memoir." <br /><br /><em>Beth Gaston Moon is an analyst at <a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/">Schaeffer's Investment Research</a>.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/random-house-offers-refund-for-a-million-little-pieces/">Random House offers refund for "A Million Little Pieces"</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 18 May 2007 11:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/random-house-offers-refund-for-a-million-little-pieces/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/898998/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/random-house-offers-refund-for-a-million-little-pieces/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bertelsmann</category><category>books</category><category>james frey</category><category>JamesFrey</category><category>lawsuits</category><category>literature</category><category>memoirs</category><category>million little pieces</category><category>MillionLittlePieces</category><category>oprah winfrey</category><category>OprahWinfrey</category><category>publishing</category><category>Random House</category><category>RandomHouse</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 11:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oprah supports Obama for President]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/07/oprah-supports-obama-for-president/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/07/oprah-supports-obama-for-president/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/07/oprah-supports-obama-for-president/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xmsr/" rel="tag">XM Satellite Radio (XMSR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/oprah57.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Senator Barack Obama received a huge endorsement to his campaign last week from <a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/05/03/oprah-endorses-obama-2/">Oprah Winfrey.</a> If you question the power of her endorsement, I would point out that she recently convinced millions of Americans to read <em>As I Lay Dying</em> by William Faulkner. Only parting the Red Sea would have been a greater miracle.<br /><br />The advantages to Obama of having Oprah on his side are wide-ranging, and start with the good will his brand gains by its association with hers. In a recent <a href="http://publications.mediapost.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=44755">Celebrity Trust Index</a> compiled by Davie-Brown Talent, Oprah and Tom Hanks were named as the most trustworthy celebrities. And the most trend-setting? Oprah, again. To people impressed with wealth, <a href="http://www.forbes.com/finance/lists/54/2004/LIR.jhtml?passListId=54&amp;passYear=2004&amp;passListType=Person&amp;uniqueId=O0ZT&amp;datatype=Person">her $1.3 billion</a> will speak volumes.<br /><br />Add this extraordinary good will to her market penetration, and Obama couldn't ask for a better supporter. Oprah is best known for her daily talk show, but she also hosts the daily <em>Oprah &amp; Friends</em> radio show on <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xm-satellite-radio-holdings-inc/xmsr/nas">XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xm-satellite-radio-holdings-inc/xmsr/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">XMSR</a>), publishes <em>O, the Oprah Magazine</em>, and works the Internet through <a href="http://www2.oprah.com/index.jhtml">Oprah.com.<br /></a><br />Her presence should benefit Obama several ways. It will certainly help with fund raising, both from Oprah's audience and those bandwagon riders who see her endorsement as legitimizing his prospects.</p>
<p>Obama has, surprisingly, received <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/24/AR2007012402032.html">lukewarm support from the African-American community,</a> and this endorsement should elevate his stature in that demographic. Traditionally, Democrats benefit from large vote turnout, and he could benefit if Oprah uses her bully pulpit to inspire a strong get-out-the-vote movement. <br /><br />Best of all, by announcing for Obama, Oprah has eliminated Obama's greatest threat as a potential candidate: Oprah herself. What a candidate she would be!</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/07/oprah-supports-obama-for-president/">Oprah supports Obama for President</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 07 May 2007 11:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/05/03/oprah-endorses-obama-2/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/07/oprah-supports-obama-for-president/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/890291/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/07/oprah-supports-obama-for-president/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2008 presidential campaign</category><category>2008PresidentialCampaign</category><category>barak obama</category><category>BarakObama</category><category>celebrity endorsement</category><category>CelebrityEndorsement</category><category>oprah</category><category>oprah and obama</category><category>oprah endorsement'</category><category>oprah winfrey</category><category>OprahAndObama</category><category>OprahEndorsement'</category><category>OprahWinfrey</category><category>xmsr</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Barlow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 11:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Businesswomen I envy: it's not always their money]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/08/businesswomen-i-envy-its-not-always-their-money/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/08/businesswomen-i-envy-its-not-always-their-money/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/08/businesswomen-i-envy-its-not-always-their-money/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/03/maria_bartiromo_evanagostini_getty_160.jpg" />I have been clicking along through <a href="http://money.aol.com/forbes/general/richest-women-billioniares"><em>Forbes</em>' "Billionaire Women We Envy" list</a> and finding very little to which I related. Sure, Oprah's on my list, but not because she's a billionaire so much. And I started thinking... what is it, really, that I envy? Because envy is far, far from admiration. It's a whole other category. Who do I envy, and why?<br /><br />When I saw the headline, before I even clicked further, I thought "Maria Bartiromo." She doesn't even make <em>Forbes</em>' cutoff -- she's not a billionaire, for starters. But if there's anyone I envy, it's Maria, she of the smoky eyes and the men in powerful places who do stupid, stupid things for her.<br /><br />What do women envy of other women? It's not their money, at least, not for me. It's their power, their fame, their ability to juggle family and career. And most of all it's their ability to manipulate others without seeming manipulative at all. It's the Money Honey, able to move markets with a bat of her dark eyelashes.<br /><br />If I was to create a list of the women most worthy of a female MBA's envy, here's who would be on it:<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/08/businesswomen-i-envy-its-not-always-their-money/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Businesswomen I envy: it's not always their money</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/08/businesswomen-i-envy-its-not-always-their-money/">Businesswomen I envy: it's not always their money</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 08 Mar 2007 04:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/08/businesswomen-i-envy-its-not-always-their-money/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/847894/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/08/businesswomen-i-envy-its-not-always-their-money/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>admire</category><category>bartiromo</category><category>envy</category><category>forbes</category><category>maria</category><category>oprah</category><category>oprah winfrey</category><category>OprahWinfrey</category><category>women</category><category>women i admire</category><category>women i envy</category><category>women in business</category><category>WomenIAdmire</category><category>WomenIEnvy</category><category>WomenInBusiness</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 04:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Best &amp; Worst: Oprah Winfrey too powerful, too rich?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/12/best-and-worst-oprah-winfrey-too-powerful-too-rich/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/12/best-and-worst-oprah-winfrey-too-powerful-too-rich/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/12/best-and-worst-oprah-winfrey-too-powerful-too-rich/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/best-and-worst-2006/" rel="tag">Best and Worst 2006</a></p><p><em><img id="vimage_1" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/12/tom-brit-oprah-.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />This post is written as part of AOL Money &amp; Finance's Best &amp; Worst 2006. If you feel Oprah Winfrey makes too much money, <a href="http://money.aol.com/best-and-worst-in-money-2006/most-overpaid-celebrity">cast your vote</a></em>.</p>
<p>Multiple Emmy Award-winning host of <em>The Oprah Winfrey Show,</em> the highest-rated talk show in television history, Oprah Winfrey is also an Academy Award-nominated actress and a magazine publisher. Winfrey co-founded the women's cable television network, Oxygen, and is also the president of Harpo Productions. </p>
<p><em>Forbes</em> recently estimated Winfrey's wealth at $1.5 billion, and has referred to her as the world's only black billionaire. She currently lives on a 42-acre ocean and mountain view estate in Montecito, California, and also has an apartment in Chicago, an estate on Fisher Island off the coast of Miami, a ski house in Telluride, Colorado, and property on Maui, Hawaii. Winfrey was called "arguably the world's most powerful woman" by CNN, and in 2003 she edged out both Superman and Elvis Presley to be named the greatest pop-culture icon of all time by VH1. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/12/best-and-worst-oprah-winfrey-too-powerful-too-rich/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Best &amp; Worst: Oprah Winfrey too powerful, too rich?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/12/best-and-worst-oprah-winfrey-too-powerful-too-rich/">Best &amp; Worst: Oprah Winfrey too powerful, too rich?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/12/best-and-worst-oprah-winfrey-too-powerful-too-rich/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/709717/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/12/best-and-worst-oprah-winfrey-too-powerful-too-rich/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Elvis Presley</category><category>Fisher Island</category><category>Harpo Productions</category><category>mad cow disease</category><category>Maui</category><category>Oprah Effect</category><category>Oprah Winfrey</category><category>Oprah's Book Club</category><category>OprahWinfrey</category><category>Oxygen network</category><category>pop culture icons</category><category>social norms</category><category>tabloid talk shows</category><category>Telluride</category><category>VH1</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oprah's 'Pay it Forward' show costly for audience: charity doesn't begin on TV]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/24/oprahs-pay-it-forward-show-costly-for-audience-charity-doesn/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/24/oprahs-pay-it-forward-show-costly-for-audience-charity-doesn/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/24/oprahs-pay-it-forward-show-costly-for-audience-charity-doesn/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p>I <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/22/will-you-pay-it-forward-with-oprah-or-rely-on-good-ol-consump/">wondered on Wednesday about Oprah's</a> so-called <a href="http://money.aol.com/cnnmoney/general/canvas3/_a/oprah-ditches-favorite-things-in-favor/20061115124109990001">"Pay it Forward" show</a>, where she gave audience members $1000 debit cards, loaned them video cameras, and told them to go out and do good works in a much-ballyhoed <a href="http://money.aol.com/cnnmoney/general/canvas3/_a/oprahs-favorite-things-a-blessing-and-a/20061122115409990001">replacement for her "favorite things"</a> holiday show. So charitable, I thought.<br /><br />And then the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/22/will-you-pay-it-forward-with-oprah-or-rely-on-good-ol-consump/#comments">comments started coming</a>.<br /><br />Audience members were asked to come back for the wrap-up show at their own expense. And they did, expecting (it seems) that their difficult journeys of giving back would be featured. Everybody loves a little fame, or at least thanks, for their efforts. And, let's face it, if Oprah asked you to film something you'd done, and then come back to the show, wouldn't you come? Of course you would.<br /><br />Except that, once back in the studio audience, only a very few of the audience members' stories were told. The audience was also informed they couldn't keep the video cameras -- the tax burden would be too much (despite, as some commenters mentioned, the fact that the expense to return to Chicago for the taping was many times greater than any tax burden). Those who wrote in weren't so upset that their exploits went unwatched (despite the fact that they'd worked very hard to execute and record the tale of their response to Oprah's challenge) -- they were more hurt that the producers asked them all back without mentioning which clips would be shown. As Connie Miller said, "When the producers called the audience to return they should have informed them that their particular stories were not going to be highlighted so they could choose to get a pat on the back from Oprah from home and not pay additional funds to come back."<br /><br />The final injury? When the audience members were in the waiting room, the producers played reels of past "Favorite Things" shows, so the charitable and entirely gift-free viewers could see the delight as audience members of years past discovered free gift ... after free gift ... after free gift.<br /><br />Sheesh. At least give them a pashmina shawl, Oprah!<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/24/oprahs-pay-it-forward-show-costly-for-audience-charity-doesn/">Oprah's 'Pay it Forward' show costly for audience: charity doesn't begin on TV</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/24/oprahs-pay-it-forward-show-costly-for-audience-charity-doesn/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/707247/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/24/oprahs-pay-it-forward-show-costly-for-audience-charity-doesn/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>favorite things</category><category>favorite things show</category><category>FavoriteThings</category><category>FavoriteThingsShow</category><category>oprah</category><category>oprah favorite things</category><category>oprah pay it forward</category><category>oprah winfrey</category><category>oprah winfrey favorite things</category><category>oprah winfrey pay it forward</category><category>OprahFavoriteThings</category><category>OprahPayItForward</category><category>OprahWinfrey</category><category>OprahWinfreyFavoriteThings</category><category>OprahWinfreyPayItForward</category><category>pay it forward</category><category>pay it forward show</category><category>PayItForward</category><category>PayItForwardShow</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:12:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will you 'pay it forward' with Oprah or rely on good ol' consumption?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/22/will-you-pay-it-forward-with-oprah-or-rely-on-good-ol-consump/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/22/will-you-pay-it-forward-with-oprah-or-rely-on-good-ol-consump/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/22/will-you-pay-it-forward-with-oprah-or-rely-on-good-ol-consump/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="oprah winfrey" id="vimage_1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/11/oprah_evanagostini_getty_2006-11-22.jpg" />Oprah, Oprah, Oprah. We've always relied on you as the doyenne of spendy gifts, the queen of conspicious consumption. It was you, every year, who announced your "favorites" with much fanfare and fabulous giveaways to your adoring audience (and who wouldn't adore you, with your sponsorship-fueled generosity?).<br /><br />But this year, you've betrayed the capitalist in us all. You've really gone and done it this time. <a href="http://money.aol.com/cnnmoney/general/canvas3/_a/oprah-ditches-favorite-things-in-favor/20061115124109990001">You've told us to give to charities, not buy things</a>. Huh?<br /><br />Oh, sure, I'm all for philathropy. But I don't expect this of Oprah. Consumers everywhere are relying on her for her wisdom in selecting the must-have gifts for the holiday. Small, artsy and luxe companies <a href="http://money.aol.com/cnnmoney/general/canvas3/_a/oprahs-favorite-things-a-blessing-and-a/20061122115409990001">rely on her (or fear her, as the case may be)</a> to send stacks and gigabytes of orders their way, with a "must-deliver" date of December 24th.<br /><br />Not this year. This year, you're supposed to use your spare cash (and the $1000 debit card, if you were in her audience during the October taping of Oprah's "Pay it Forward" show) to do good works.<br /><br />I'm all for charity, but I don't see it as a replacement for giving things. I may sometimes interpret the "things" in a different way than Oprah ever did, choosing to give hand-made gifts, books, photographs, scores from the thrift stores, and other slightly less conspicuous examples of consumption. But holiday shopping is inviolate ... I'll wait 'til December 30th or so and <em>then</em> get into the selflessly charitable spirit. Will you follow Oprah's lead, or stick with the pretty-and-tangible things this holiday season?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/22/will-you-pay-it-forward-with-oprah-or-rely-on-good-ol-consump/">Will you 'pay it forward' with Oprah or rely on good ol' consumption?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/22/will-you-pay-it-forward-with-oprah-or-rely-on-good-ol-consump/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/706471/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/22/will-you-pay-it-forward-with-oprah-or-rely-on-good-ol-consump/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>charity</category><category>favorites</category><category>gifts</category><category>giving</category><category>holiday</category><category>oprah</category><category>oprah winfrey</category><category>oprah's favorites</category><category>Oprah'sFavorites</category><category>OprahWinfrey</category><category>pay it forward</category><category>PayItForward</category><category>tv</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[XM Radio brings Oprah on board]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/26/xm-radio-brings-oprah-on-board/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/26/xm-radio-brings-oprah-on-board/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/26/xm-radio-brings-oprah-on-board/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xmsr/" rel="tag">XM Satellite Radio (XMSR)</a></p><img id="vimage_1" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/09/oprahxm%282%29.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />With XM Radio swimming in the wake of competitor Sirius' success with bringing Howard Stern into the satellite radio biz, XM is going after a little of its own star power. The satellite radio network signed TV and publishing personality Oprah Winfrey to the network back in February, and <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/investor/content/sep2006/pi20060925_596129.htm?campaign_id=rss_null">just announced</a> the Oprah talk network to debut today -- September 26.<br /><br />This is a rather shrewd move by XM that will cost a pretty penny, but there are surely legions of women nationwide who, like their male counterparts and Stern, will have XM radio always handy just to hear their favorite celebrity. It's a formula for success that has worked for Sirius so far, and Oprah has a following just as impressive, if not more. XM hopes it is more.<br /><br />In a perfect naming convention, the talk channel "Oprah and Friends" will make its debut at 11:00am EST today after being announced as available just yesterday (the official announcement was in February). Nothing like waiting until the last minute and launching right after the announcement to capitalize on the buzz and the incessant need most Americans have for instant gratification.<br /><br />While Stern notched a reported $500 million deal with Sirius, Oprah's deal is reportedly worth $55 million. In Stern's defense these days, it's hard to not count the amazing <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/14/so-how-many-xm-and-sirius-subscribers-are-there-really/">3 million+ customers</a> who have tuned into Sirius since the raw radio personality took to the airwaves last January.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/26/xm-radio-brings-oprah-on-board/">XM Radio brings Oprah on board</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/investor/content/sep2006/pi20060925_596129.htm?campaign_id=rss_null>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/26/xm-radio-brings-oprah-on-board/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/674849/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/26/xm-radio-brings-oprah-on-board/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Howard Stern</category><category>HowardStern</category><category>Oprah</category><category>Oprah Winfrey</category><category>Oprah XM</category><category>OprahWinfrey</category><category>OprahXm</category><category>Sirius Radio</category><category>SiriusRadio</category><category>XM Radio</category><category>XmRadio</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[XMSR gains 398k subscribers in Q2 '06]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/10/xmsr-gains-398k-subscribers-in-q2-06/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/10/xmsr-gains-398k-subscribers-in-q2-06/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/10/xmsr-gains-398k-subscribers-in-q2-06/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xmsr/" rel="tag">XM Satellite Radio (XMSR)</a></p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/10/xmsr-gains-398k-subscribers-in-q2-06/"><img id="vimage_1" height="179" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/07/radio.jpg" width="240" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /></a>XMSR announced at the end of last week that close to 400k new subscribers came aboard during the second quarter, bringing XM's total subscriber count to 6.89 million. <br /><br />"As we previously indicated, subscriber growth in the second quarter was limited by product availability and overall softness in the retail channel," said Hugh Panero, President and CEO, XM Satellite Radio. "As we approach seven million subscribers, however, satellite radio continues to be one of the fastest growing consumer entertainment products."<br /><br />The company has scheduled a conference call on July 27, 2006, at 10:00 AM ET to announce and discuss its financial results for the second quarter of 2006. <br /><br />XM has been busy adding name-brand personalities to its already star-speckled line up, a continuing effort to draw new listeners to XM's side of the satellite radio market. The much anticipated arrival of Oprah Winfrey in September, and the recent addition of Willie Nelson, are hoped to buoy soft sales heading into the last half of the year. <br />
<p>It remains to be seen how effective the Harpo machine will be in drawing subscribers to XM. Oprah seems to turn everything she touches into gold but, I'm just hoping, for the sake of my own santiy and that of the other 6.89 million XM subscribers, that she doesn't decide to bring Dr. Phil with her. <br /></p>
[Photo by <a href="http://everystockphoto.com/photo.php?photo_id=263668">miramb</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/10/xmsr-gains-398k-subscribers-in-q2-06/">XMSR gains 398k subscribers in Q2 '06</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/10/xmsr-gains-398k-subscribers-in-q2-06/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/641316/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/10/xmsr-gains-398k-subscribers-in-q2-06/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dr. phil</category><category>Dr.Phil</category><category>oprah</category><category>oprah winfrey</category><category>OprahWinfrey</category><category>phil</category><category>satellite</category><category>satellite radio</category><category>SatelliteRadio</category><category>satellites</category><category>subscriberes</category><category>willie nelson</category><category>WillieNelson</category><category>xm subscribers</category><category>xmsr</category><category>XmSubscribers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Grant Robertson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:21:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
