<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Adobe looks squarely at Google, Microsoft with new web-based tools]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/adobe-looks-squarely-at-google-microsoft-with-new-web-based-too/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/adobe-looks-squarely-at-google-microsoft-with-new-web-based-too/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/adobe-looks-squarely-at-google-microsoft-with-new-web-based-too/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/adbe/" rel="tag">Adobe Systems (ADBE)</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/ad.jpg" />The father of the PDF document, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/adobe-systems-incorporated/adbe/nas">Adobe Systems Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/adobe-systems-incorporated/adbe/nas">ADBE</a>), is starting to push further into the web-based document creation business. That strategy puts it squarely in the cross-hairs of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) and its excellent Google Docs product, as well as software giant <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>), which is set to release a major online component with Office 2010.</p>
<p>Adobe indicated that a fee-based version its new online initiatives would allow businesses to covert all kinds of documents to the de-facto PDF standard, as well as hold online meetings via Acrobat.com.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/adobe-looks-squarely-at-google-microsoft-with-new-web-based-too/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Adobe looks squarely at Google, Microsoft with new web-based tools</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/adobe-looks-squarely-at-google-microsoft-with-new-web-based-too/">Adobe looks squarely at Google, Microsoft with new web-based tools</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/adobe-looks-squarely-at-google-microsoft-with-new-web-based-too/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19069696/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/adobe-looks-squarely-at-google-microsoft-with-new-web-based-too/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ADBE</category><category>Adobe</category><category>Adobe CS4</category><category>DimDim</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google Docs</category><category>Microsoft Office</category><category>MSFT</category><category>online conferencing</category><category>online tools</category><category>OpenOffice</category><category>PDF</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft after the bell 06-22-06: the Gates legacy?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/22/microsoft-after-the-bell-06-22-06-the-gates-legacy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/22/microsoft-after-the-bell-06-22-06-the-gates-legacy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/22/microsoft-after-the-bell-06-22-06-the-gates-legacy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><p><img id="vimage_1" alt="microsoft intraday chart 06-22-2006" hspace="4" src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/06/msft_chart_06222006.gjpg.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />I predict that, for the rest of the summer, all news of Microsoft, Inc.&nbsp;will be tinged by the impending departure of Bill Gates from day-to-day operations. Who will take his mantle? <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2006/06/21/technology/microsoft.reut/index.htm">Who else will leave</a>? And, grandly, <a href="http://aol.businessweek.com/technology/content/jun2006/tc20060622_627526.htm">what will be his legacy</a>?</p>
<p>Steve Hamm of <em>BusinessWeek</em> wonders, will Gates be remembered for his innovations and good works, or for his anti-competitive "bare-knuckle tactics"? Hamm's conclusion seems to be that Gates deserves the Carnegie legacy (as opposed to Rockefeller) thanks to the thousands of millionaires he minted and the great works he's already begun to do with his foundation.</p>
<p>Evidently, the legacy didn't look great to investors (or maybe they're just still smarting over <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/22/google-and-adobe-sign-expansive-distribution-deal/">Google's success in capturing Adobe's heart</a>, an <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/06/why-does-adobe-hate-microsoft-so/">obvious snub of Microsoft</a> in favor of the company's&nbsp;oogly rival), as the stock was down 20 cents to $22.88.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/22/microsoft-after-the-bell-06-22-06-the-gates-legacy/">Microsoft after the bell 06-22-06: the Gates legacy?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 22 Jun 2006 18:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://aol.businessweek.com/technology/content/jun2006/tc20060622_627526.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/22/microsoft-after-the-bell-06-22-06-the-gates-legacy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/636076/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/22/microsoft-after-the-bell-06-22-06-the-gates-legacy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>$22.88</category><category>adobe</category><category>adobe google</category><category>adobe microsoft</category><category>adobe pdf</category><category>AdobeGoogle</category><category>AdobeMicrosoft</category><category>AdobePdf</category><category>bill gates</category><category>bill gates legacy</category><category>BillGates</category><category>BillGatesLegacy</category><category>gates</category><category>gates leaving</category><category>gates legacy</category><category>gates retiring</category><category>gates stepping down</category><category>GatesLeaving</category><category>GatesLegacy</category><category>GatesRetiring</category><category>GatesSteppingDown</category><category>google adobe</category><category>GoogleAdobe</category><category>legacy</category><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft adobe</category><category>MicrosoftAdobe</category><category>msft</category><category>pdf</category><category>ray ozzie</category><category>RayOzzie</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 18:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why does Adobe hate Microsoft so?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/06/why-does-adobe-hate-microsoft-so/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/06/why-does-adobe-hate-microsoft-so/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/06/why-does-adobe-hate-microsoft-so/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/insider-blogging/" rel="tag">Insider Blogging</a></p><p>Adobe's behavior with regards to Microsoft's attempt to include&nbsp;the&nbsp;ability to create PDF files out of Microsoft Office documents&nbsp;is,<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/05/AR2006060501315_2.html"> according to the <em>Washington Post</em></a>, "at best arrogance, at worst price collusion -- a violation of basic antitrust law." First Adobe told the world at large that it should feel free to utilize the company's PDF standard. And then Adobe let a number of other word processors do just that -- including, notably, Microsoft Word's biggest competitor, WordPerfect. </p>
<p>Then Adobe did a mid-stream switcheroo, and told Microsoft that if it wanted to include PDF creation ability in Microsoft Office 2007, the software manufacturer needed to charge <em>separately</em> for the feature. If not?&nbsp;A lawsuit would naturally follow.</p>
<p>Microsoft did the same thing I would have done: pulled PDF support from Office. And&nbsp;the <em>Post</em>'s Rob Pegoraro wishes "that the bad old Microsoft would reemerge for this one occasion and tell Adobe to go pound sand," while admitting that many analysts with a sense of history remember that Microsoft has a habit of somehow poisoning standards when it incorporates them into its software packages.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/06/why-does-adobe-hate-microsoft-so/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Why does Adobe hate Microsoft so?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/06/why-does-adobe-hate-microsoft-so/">Why does Adobe hate Microsoft so?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 06 Jun 2006 17:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/05/AR2006060501315_2.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/06/why-does-adobe-hate-microsoft-so/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/630447/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/06/why-does-adobe-hate-microsoft-so/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>adobe</category><category>adobe and microsoft</category><category>adobe microsoft</category><category>adobe pdf</category><category>adobe professional</category><category>AdobeAndMicrosoft</category><category>AdobeMicrosoft</category><category>AdobePdf</category><category>AdobeProfessional</category><category>create pdf</category><category>CreatePdf</category><category>microsoft adobe</category><category>microsoft office 2007</category><category>MicrosoftAdobe</category><category>MicrosoftOffice2007</category><category>office 2007</category><category>Office2007</category><category>pdf</category><category>pdf file</category><category>pdf writer</category><category>PdfFile</category><category>PdfWriter</category><category>vista</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 17:02:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
