<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Paris Hilton Trades McDonald's for Bikini]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/15/paris-hilton-trades-mcdonalds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/15/paris-hilton-trades-mcdonalds/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/15/paris-hilton-trades-mcdonalds/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/currency/" rel="tag">Currency</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/paris-hilton.jpg" alt="Paris Hilton" /><a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/mcdonald-s-corporation/mcd/nys">McDonald's</a> (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/mcdonald-s-corporation/mcd/nys">MCD</a>) shares dropped a whopping 1.29% Friday on news that Paris Hilton is setting aside her fast-food habit in exchange for <a href="http://www.starpulse.com/news/index.php/2010/05/14/paris_hilton_says_no_more_mcdonalds">a bikini-ready body</a>. Paris is quoted by Starpulse.com as stating: "I've been really working out. I'm not eating fast food anymore. No more McDonald's. (I'm) getting my bikini body, so I'm about that." This must come as a serious blow to McDonald's.</p>
<p>Well okay, perhaps Paris Hilton's declaration isn't really all that important to McDonald's shareholders, but the truth remains that MCD shares are again showing signs that they have peaked. The question is why? The company's share price is currently hitting strong resistance in the range of $71, and the three key reasons are fierce competition, international monetary exchange instability, and operating expense volatility.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/15/paris-hilton-trades-mcdonalds/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Paris Hilton Trades McDonald's for Bikini</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/15/paris-hilton-trades-mcdonalds/">Paris Hilton Trades McDonald's for Bikini</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 15 May 2010 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/15/paris-hilton-trades-mcdonalds/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19478390/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/15/paris-hilton-trades-mcdonalds/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>exchange rates</category><category>featured</category><category>instability</category><category>inthenews</category><category>MCD</category><category>McDonalds</category><category>Paris Hilton</category><category>volatility</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ads Gone Bad: Was Paris Hilton too spicy for Carl's Jr.?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/ads-gone-bad-was-paris-hilton-too-spicy-for-carls-jr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/ads-gone-bad-was-paris-hilton-too-spicy-for-carls-jr/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/ads-gone-bad-was-paris-hilton-too-spicy-for-carls-jr/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ckr/" rel="tag">CKE Restaurants (CKR)</a></p><p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/ads-gone-bad-carls-200cs082808.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />This post is part of our <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/ads-gone-bad">Ads Gone Bad</a></strong> series. Share your thoughts and memories of this ad in the comments, and be sure to check out our other posts on marketing gone wrong.</em></p>
<p>In 2005, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cke-restaurants-inc-united-states/ckr/nys">CKE Restaurants Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cke-restaurants-inc-united-states/ckr/nys">CKR</a>) outraged both social conservatives and lovers of music at the same time when its Carl's Jr. chain hired Paris Hilton to shill its new Spicy Burger. It set a new standard of tastelessness that will be difficult to equal.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/P82hABWq1To&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/P82hABWq1To&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>Conservatives -- most Americans actually -- find the fact that Paris Hilton is famous at all to be a offensive. Her main claim to fame comes from her appearance in a now-infamous sex tape. The appeal of her one-time hit show <em>The</em> <em>Simple Life</em> eluded me, but hey, I was not the target demographic. I am a 40-year-old married guy so I can't speak to her numerous other enterprises, such as the perfume <a href="http://www.bizrate.com/search__cat_id--1__keyword--paris+hilton.html">Heiress</a>. Her single "<a href="http://www.parishilton.com/">Stars Are Blind</a>" was not as awful as I thought it would be, but maybe I have gone tone deaf listening to too many Elmo songs. Parents of toddlers will understand.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/ads-gone-bad-was-paris-hilton-too-spicy-for-carls-jr/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ads Gone Bad: Was Paris Hilton too spicy for Carl's Jr.?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/ads-gone-bad-was-paris-hilton-too-spicy-for-carls-jr/">Ads Gone Bad: Was Paris Hilton too spicy for Carl's Jr.?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/ads-gone-bad-was-paris-hilton-too-spicy-for-carls-jr/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1301354/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/ads-gone-bad-was-paris-hilton-too-spicy-for-carls-jr/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ads</category><category>Ads Gone Bad</category><category>advertising</category><category>Carls Jr.</category><category>CKE</category><category>Hardees</category><category>Paris Hilton</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA['Fool's Gold' takes number-one spot at the box office]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/11/fools-gold-takes-number-one-spot-at-the-box-office/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/11/fools-gold-takes-number-one-spot-at-the-box-office/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/11/fools-gold-takes-number-one-spot-at-the-box-office/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a></p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jubeiz/97091197/"><img width="157" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="240" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/kate-hudson-3.jpg" alt="Kate Hudson, star of Fool's Gold" /></a>On RottenTomatoes.com, recent Warner Brothers release <em>Fool's Gold</em> <a target="_blank" href="http://beta.rottentomatoes.com/m/10009167-fools_gold/">earns a rating</a> of 10% (out of a possible 100%) and a consensus review: "Full of humorless gags, a predictable storyline and flat performances." Nearly 750 users of T<a target="_blank" href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0770752/">he Internet Movie Database</a> give the stock a grade of 4.8 on a 1-10 scale. <br /><br />And still, the romantic-adventure led by Matthew McConaughey and Kate Hudson (and featuring Malcolm-Jamal "Theo Huxtable" Warner) <a target="_blank" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120266830298357169.html?mod=hpp_us_whats_news&amp;apl=y&amp;r=645152">scored big</a> at the box office, drawing nearly $22 million to nab the number-one spot for the typically slow weekend. With Valentine's Day on Thursday, the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) unit is hoping <em>Fool's Gold </em>continues to lure couples into the theaters this upcoming weekend (unless they place a lot of weight in Internet reviewers). <br /><br />Box-office expert Paul Dergarabedian told <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> that the release date is shrewd marketing indeed. "A great marketing campaign, two appealing stars, and reviews be damned... heading into Valentine's week, it's sort of a natural." <br /><br />Elsewhere on the charts, Martin Lawrence vehicle <em>Welcome Home Roscoe Jenkins </em>opened at number 2, pulling in $17.1 million. In its second week, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">The Walt Disney Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">DIS</a>)'s <em>Hannah Montana &amp; Miley Cyrus: Best of Both Worlds Concert </em>(phew) took in $10.5 million, moving into third place after topping the box-office charts last weekend. <br /><br />And in case you missed it, <em>The Hottie and the Nottie</em>, starring Paris Hilton, was released in 111 theaters and earned an average of $225 per site, for a pitiful total draw of $25,000, according to estimates. Write your own joke here.<br /><br /><em>Beth Gaston Moon is an analyst at <a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/commentary/optionbytes.aspx">Schaeffer's Investment Research</a></em>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/11/fools-gold-takes-number-one-spot-at-the-box-office/">'Fool's Gold' takes number-one spot at the box office</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120266830298357169.html?mod=hpp_us_whats_news&amp;apl=y&amp;r=645152>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/11/fools-gold-takes-number-one-spot-at-the-box-office/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1112329/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/11/fools-gold-takes-number-one-spot-at-the-box-office/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dis</category><category>fool's gold</category><category>Fool'sGold</category><category>hannah montana</category><category>HannahMontana</category><category>hottie and the nottie</category><category>HottieAndTheNottie</category><category>kate hudson</category><category>KateHudson</category><category>matthew Mcconaughey</category><category>MatthewMcconaughey</category><category>miley cyrus</category><category>MileyCyrus</category><category>paris hilton</category><category>ParisHilton</category><category>twx</category><category>warner brothers</category><category>WarnerBrothers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Here's how Fox Business Network can get viewers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/04/heres-how-fox-business-network-can-get-viewers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/04/heres-how-fox-business-network-can-get-viewers/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/04/heres-how-fox-business-network-can-get-viewers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/foxbusinesschannelogo160.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">News Corp</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">NWS</a>) today announced that it will revamp its Fox Business Network lineup in response to recent viewership reports showing that Americans would <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/04/fox-business-gets-crushed/">rather undergo a cavity search than watch the shows.</a><br />
<p> </p>
<p>Drawing upon inspiration from its successful Fox Entertainment division, we hear that a number of new programs are under consideration:</p>
<ul>
    <li><em>Homer Nose Business</em> -- a "Simpsons" take on making 'd'oh' in the food and beverage industries, with field reporters Apu Nahasapeemapetilon, Jr. and Moe Szyslak. </li>
    <li><em>24:00 Stocks</em> -- Kiefer Sutherland hosts a new studio show in which CEOs of tanking corporations are subjected to waterboarding and other amusing non-torture interview techniques in order to extract crucial investor information. </li>
    <li><em>American Idle --</em>The 'idle rich' report by Paris Hilton, featuring the latest expos&eacute;s directly from the wellspring of the trickle-down economy. </li>
    <li><em>Prison Break</em>-- Five-minute updates hosted by Andrew Fastow, Conrad Black and Lou Pearlman, live from their offices in U.S. Federal government facilities. </li>
</ul>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/04/heres-how-fox-business-network-can-get-viewers/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Here's how Fox Business Network can get viewers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/04/heres-how-fox-business-network-can-get-viewers/">Here's how Fox Business Network can get viewers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 04 Jan 2008 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/04/heres-how-fox-business-network-can-get-viewers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1077371/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/04/heres-how-fox-business-network-can-get-viewers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>andrew fastow</category><category>AndrewFastow</category><category>conrad black</category><category>ConradBlack</category><category>fox business</category><category>FoxBusiness</category><category>heidi fleiss</category><category>HeidiFleiss</category><category>homer simpson</category><category>HomerSimpson</category><category>humor</category><category>keifer sutherland</category><category>KeiferSutherland</category><category>lou pearlman</category><category>LouPearlman</category><category>paris hilton</category><category>ParisHilton</category><category>peter griffin</category><category>PeterGriffin</category><category>satire</category><category>steve forbes</category><category>SteveForbes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Barlow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Poor Paris! Barron Hilton leaves 97% of fortune to charity]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/27/poor-paris-barron-hilton-leaves-97-of-fortune-to-charity/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/27/poor-paris-barron-hilton-leaves-97-of-fortune-to-charity/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/27/poor-paris-barron-hilton-leaves-97-of-fortune-to-charity/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/het/" rel="tag">Harrah's Entertainment (HET)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hlt/" rel="tag">Hilton Hotels (HLT)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="Paris Hilton &amp; Barron Hilton "  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/paris-hilton.jpg" />Paris Hilton, who rose to fame as an heiress, is less than 3% the heiress she could have been. Her grandfather, Hilton Hotels patriarch Barron Hilton is leaving 97% of his $2.3 billion personal fortune to charity, leaving approximately $69 (what an appropriate number!) million available for everyone else, including Paris.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/california/la-me-hilton27dec27,1,7186311.story?coll=la-headlines-pe-california">According</a> to the <em>Los Angeles Times</em>, "The contribution to the Conrad N. Hilton Foundation, to come from the sale of Hilton Hotels Corp. and the pending sale of Harrah's Entertainment Inc. after the money is placed in a trust, is the largest in the foundation's history and will bring its value to about $4.5 billion."</p>
<p>But don't feel too bad for Paris. Even if she won't really be much of an heiress, she has already built her own empire based on her grandfather's wealth -- well, that and going to jail and such.</p>
<p>But still, it's refreshing to see Barron Hilton giving his money to people who deserve it. It's hard to imagine anyone less deserving than Paris Hilton, and maybe this will encourage her to stop acting like such a spoiled brat.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/27/poor-paris-barron-hilton-leaves-97-of-fortune-to-charity/">Poor Paris! Barron Hilton leaves 97% of fortune to charity</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 27 Dec 2007 08:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/california/la-me-hilton27dec27,1,7186311.story?coll=la-headlines-pe-california>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/27/poor-paris-barron-hilton-leaves-97-of-fortune-to-charity/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1071570/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/27/poor-paris-barron-hilton-leaves-97-of-fortune-to-charity/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barron Hilton</category><category>BarronHilton</category><category>Conrad N. Hilton Foundation</category><category>ConradN.HiltonFoundation</category><category>Hilton</category><category>Paris Hilton</category><category>ParisHilton</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 08:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Most overpaid celebrities]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/01/best-and-worst-of-2007-most-overpaid-celebrities/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/01/best-and-worst-of-2007-most-overpaid-celebrities/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/01/best-and-worst-of-2007-most-overpaid-celebrities/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p><em><iframe align="left" src="http://webcenter.polls.aol.com/modular.jsp?template=1512&amp;view=127258&amp;pollId=127358&amp;channel=aol_us_personalfinance&amp;popup=yes" frameborder="0" width="229" scrolling="no" height="190"></iframe>This post was part of AOL Money &amp; Finance's </em><em><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/best-and-worst-2007"><strong>Best &amp; Worst of 2007</strong></a> feature</em><em>. Voting has now closed and readers have chosen <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/best-and-worst-2007/winners">Oprah Winfrey</a> </strong>as the most overpaid celebrity of the year.</em><em> Be sure to let us know in the comments if you are pleased with this result.</em></p>
<p><img alt="Most overpaid celebrities " hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/bw-07-186-overpaid-celebrity-cs112007.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Oprah Winfrey returns to our Most Overpaid Celebrity category after having lost the title to <a href="http://money.aol.com/best-and-worst-in-money-2006/most-overpaid-celebrity">Paris Hilton last year</a>. For 2007 she is joined by overpaid celebrities Madonna, George Lopez, and Russell Crowe.</p>
<p>Winfrey, Madonna, and Lopez all made the <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2007/06/14/best-paid-celebrities-07celebrities_cz_lg_0614celeb_land.html"><em>Forbes</em> Celebrity 100</a>, a ranking of Hollywood players by pay, influence, and popularity. Winfrey, of course, comes in at number one, both in terms of pay and power. Madonna's earnings placed her at number nine on the list, while Lopez came in at number fifty-one.</p>
<p><em>Forbes</em> estimates <a href="http://www.forbes.com/lists/2007/53/07celebrities_Oprah-Winfrey_O0ZT.html">Winfrey's earnings at $260 million</a> last year, and her net worth in the area of $1.5 billion, making her the nation's wealthiest African American. She'll be adding two new reality shows to her media empire, which already includes a blockbuster daytime talk show, satellite radio show, magazine, and Broadway musical, as well as stakes in hit shows by Dr. Phil McGraw and Rachael Ray. The school for girls she founded in South Africa has drawn much media attention this year, and she's recently endorsed Barack Obama's presidential campaign. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oprah_Winfrey#Wealth">Winfrey has been called</a> the world's most powerful woman, the most influential woman in the world, one of the most influential persons of the 20th century, the world's first black woman billionaire, and the greatest pop culture icon of all time. Can any mortal person live up to all that hype?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/01/best-and-worst-of-2007-most-overpaid-celebrities/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Most overpaid celebrities</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/01/best-and-worst-of-2007-most-overpaid-celebrities/">Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Most overpaid celebrities</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 01 Dec 2007 17:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/01/best-and-worst-of-2007-most-overpaid-celebrities/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1045900/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/01/best-and-worst-of-2007-most-overpaid-celebrities/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3:10 from Yuma</category><category>American Gangster</category><category>Andy Garcia</category><category>Barack Obama</category><category>Best and Worst 2007</category><category>Bob Hope Chrysler Classic</category><category>box office</category><category>celebrities</category><category>Celebrity 100</category><category>Dr. Phil</category><category>George Lopez</category><category>Hollywood</category><category>Kevin Costner</category><category>Luke Wilson</category><category>Madonna</category><category>Matt Damon</category><category>Most Overpaid Celebrity</category><category>Oprah</category><category>Paris Hilton</category><category>PGA</category><category>Rachel Ray</category><category>Russell Crowe</category><category>Sandra Bullock</category><category>Ultimate Star Payback</category><category>Warner Bros., Live Nation</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 17:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Money Face-Off Big Winners: Oprah, Tiger Woods, Ivanka Trump, Erin Burnett]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/06/money-face-off-big-winners-oprah-tiger-woods-ivanka-trump-er/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/06/money-face-off-big-winners-oprah-tiger-woods-ivanka-trump-er/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/06/money-face-off-big-winners-oprah-tiger-woods-ivanka-trump-er/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a></p><p>It's been three weeks since our <a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/money-face-off-business-superstars"><strong>Money Face-Off</strong></a> feature ran here at BloggingStocks and on AOL, offering you the opportunity to share who you though had the financial edge in a series of twenty head-to-head match-ups. So I thought I'd take another look and see how things have worked out. </p>
<p>It's hard to pick just one big winner. In terms of the largest lead over a rival, <strong><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-ivanka-trump-vs-paris-hilton/">Ivanka Trump</a></strong> easily beats Paris Hilton with 89% of the vote. Others holding big leads over their opponents include <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-tiger-woods-vs-david-beckham/"><strong>Tiger Woods</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/16/money-face-off-warren-buffett-vs-eddie-lampert/"><strong>Warren Buffett</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-george-lucas-vs-steven-spielberg/"><strong>Steven Spielberg</strong></a>, and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-rupert-murdoch-vs-sumner-redstone/"><strong>Rupert Murdoch</strong></a>. </p>
<p>In terms of receiving the most votes, the clear leader is the <strong><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-oprah-winfrey-vs-martha-stewart/">Oprah Winfrey vs. Martha Stewart</a></strong> match-up, with just short of 150,000 votes. Other big vote getters were <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-tiger-woods-vs-david-beckham/"><strong>Tiger Woods vs. David Beckham</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/16/money-face-off-rudy-giuliani-vs-mike-bloomberg/"><strong>Rudy Giuliani vs. Michael Bloomberg</strong></a>, and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-steve-jobs-vs-bill-gates/"><strong>Bill Gates vs. Steve Jobs</strong></a>. In terms of the liveliest discussions in the comments, the winners are <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-oprah-winfrey-vs-martha-stewart/"><strong>Oprah Winfrey vs. Martha Stewart</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-maria-bartiromo-versus-erin-burnett/"><strong>Erin Burnett vs. Maria Bartiromo</strong></a>, and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/16/money-face-off-bono-vs-angelina-jolie/"><strong>Bono vs. Angelina Jolie</strong></a>. Also check out the comments for the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/16/money-face-off-jrr-tolkien-vs-jk-rowling/"><strong>J.K. Rowling vs. J.R.R Tolkien</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-tiger-woods-vs-david-beckham/"><strong>Tiger Woods vs. David Beckham</strong></a>, and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-ivanka-trump-vs-paris-hilton/"><strong>Ivanka Trump vs. Paris Hilton</strong></a> posts. </p>
<p>As for the face-off posts here that got the most attention, the clear winner is <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-maria-bartiromo-versus-erin-burnett/"><strong>Erin Burnett vs. Maria Bartiromo</strong></a>, with more than 13,000 hits. <strong><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-britney-spears-vs-lindsay-lohan/">Lindsay Lohan vs. Britney Spears</a></strong> and <strong><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-oprah-winfrey-vs-martha-stewart/">Oprah Winfrey vs. Martha Stewart</a></strong> also attracted lots of readers.</p>
<p>Results for all the face-offs follow below, but keep in mind that the voting is still open. It's not too late to add your vote or let us know what you think.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/06/money-face-off-big-winners-oprah-tiger-woods-ivanka-trump-er/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Money Face-Off Big Winners: Oprah, Tiger Woods, Ivanka Trump, Erin Burnett</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/06/money-face-off-big-winners-oprah-tiger-woods-ivanka-trump-er/">Money Face-Off Big Winners: Oprah, Tiger Woods, Ivanka Trump, Erin Burnett</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 06 Oct 2007 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/06/money-face-off-big-winners-oprah-tiger-woods-ivanka-trump-er/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1006754/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/06/money-face-off-big-winners-oprah-tiger-woods-ivanka-trump-er/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Alan Greenspan</category><category>Angelina Jolie</category><category>Ben Bernanke</category><category>Bill Gates</category><category>Bono</category><category>Britney Spears</category><category>Carl Icahn</category><category>David Beckham</category><category>Diddy</category><category>Eddie Lampert</category><category>Erin Burnett</category><category>George Lucas</category><category>George Steinbrenner</category><category>Heidi Klum</category><category>Henry Kravis</category><category>Ivanka Trump</category><category>J.K. Rowling</category><category>J.R.R. Tolkien</category><category>Jay-Z</category><category>Jim Cramer</category><category>John Bogle</category><category>Kirk Kerkorian</category><category>Lindsay Lohan</category><category>Maria Bartiromo</category><category>Mark Cuban</category><category>Martha Stewart</category><category>Mike Bloomberg</category><category>Money Face-Offs</category><category>Oprah Winfrey</category><category>Paris Hilton</category><category>Peter Lynch</category><category>Rudy Giuliani</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><category>Steve Jobs</category><category>Steve Schwarzman</category><category>Steven Spielberg</category><category>Sumner Redstone</category><category>Suze Orman</category><category>Tiger Woods</category><category>Tyra Banks</category><category>Warren Buffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Money Face-Off recap: Oprah and Tiger and Buffett, oh my!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/22/money-face-off-recap-oprah-and-tiger-and-buffett-oh-my/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/22/money-face-off-recap-oprah-and-tiger-and-buffett-oh-my/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/22/money-face-off-recap-oprah-and-tiger-and-buffett-oh-my/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a></p><p>It's been a week since our <strong>Money Face-Off</strong> posts ran here on BloggingStocks, and less than that since the <a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/money-face-off-business-superstars">Money Face-Offs</a> were featured on the AOL welcome page, and the response has been terrific. Many of the face-off polls have had more than 50,000 votes, a couple of them approaching 100,000. </p>
<p>The biggest response came to the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-oprah-winfrey-vs-martha-stewart/">Oprah Winfrey vs. Martha Stewart</a> match-up. So far, about 75 percent of respondents feel that Oprah is the more successful media magnate. Not that much surprise there, as Oprah's fans are legion. Interestingly, though, of the twenty-some comments the post has received, most of them are pro-Martha.</p>
<p>Another clear leader is <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-steve-jobs-vs-bill-gates/">Bill Gates over rival Steve Jobs</a>. About three quarters of poll votes have gone his way, despite all the buzz recently about <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) and the popularity of its products. Maybe readers are just happy that Gates is stepping down. Let us know what you think.</p>
<p>Alan Greenspan seems to be everywhere these days, promoting his new book, including Comedy Central's <em>The Daily Show</em> and NPR's <em>Fresh Air</em>. In our match-up of the current and former Fed chairs, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-alan-greenspan-vs-ben-bernanke/">Ben Bernanke vs. Alan Greenspan</a>, more than 70 percent of respondents have voted for Greenspan. Comments to the post are mixed, but seem to me to focus on Greenspan, whether pro or con.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/22/money-face-off-recap-oprah-and-tiger-and-buffett-oh-my/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Money Face-Off recap: Oprah and Tiger and Buffett, oh my!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/22/money-face-off-recap-oprah-and-tiger-and-buffett-oh-my/">Money Face-Off recap: Oprah and Tiger and Buffett, oh my!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 22 Sep 2007 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/22/money-face-off-recap-oprah-and-tiger-and-buffett-oh-my/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/995955/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/22/money-face-off-recap-oprah-and-tiger-and-buffett-oh-my/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Alan Greenspan</category><category>Angelina Jolie</category><category>Apple</category><category>Ben Bernanke</category><category>Bill Gates</category><category>Bono</category><category>Britney Spears</category><category>David Beckham</category><category>Eddie Lampert</category><category>George Lucas</category><category>George Steinbrenner</category><category>Ivanka Trump</category><category>Lindsay Lohan</category><category>Mark Cuban</category><category>Martha Stewart</category><category>Money Face-Off</category><category>Oprah Winfrey</category><category>Paris Hilton</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><category>Steve Jobs</category><category>Steven Spielberg</category><category>Sumner Redstone</category><category>the Fed</category><category>Tiger Woods</category><category>Warren Buffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Money Face-Off: Ivanka Trump vs. Paris Hilton]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-ivanka-trump-vs-paris-hilton/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-ivanka-trump-vs-paris-hilton/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-ivanka-trump-vs-paris-hilton/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/trmp/" rel="tag">Trump Entertainment Resorts (TRMP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hlt/" rel="tag">Hilton Hotels (HLT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a></p><p><em>This post is part of our <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/money-face-off-business-superstars">Money Face-Offs</a></strong> feature. Let us know who you think comes out ahead in this head-to-head match-up, and check out our other Money Face-Off posts.</em></p>
<p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/face-off-240-heiresses-cs091207.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />How does one go about drawing a comparison between <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paris_Hilton">Paris Hilton</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivanka_Trump">Ivanka Trump</a>? In my estimation, although there a some mildly reasonable parallels between the two ladies, they are two significantly different people. It's difficult in this format to strip the comparison down to bare facts and then to build a picture of each woman's character and experience from there. So, what I shall try to do is give you just the basics to help you and then I'll leave you to determine which of these women you'd prefer to spend some time with. I'd be pleased if you would comment about which woman you would choose as a business associate, an employee, a national leader, or a life partner.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-ivanka-trump-vs-paris-hilton/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Money Face-Off: Ivanka Trump vs. Paris Hilton</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-ivanka-trump-vs-paris-hilton/">Money Face-Off: Ivanka Trump vs. Paris Hilton</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 15 Sep 2007 14:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-ivanka-trump-vs-paris-hilton/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/980207/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-ivanka-trump-vs-paris-hilton/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barron Hilton</category><category>cinematical</category><category>Conrad Hilton</category><category>divas</category><category>Donald Trump</category><category>DonaldTrump</category><category>expire-images:2008-9-14</category><category>FHM</category><category>heiress</category><category>Ivanka Trump</category><category>modeling</category><category>Paris Hilton</category><category>real estate development</category><category>Trump</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 14:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dear Paris Hilton: Shut up and stop suing Hallmark]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/09/dear-paris-hilton-shut-up-and-stop-suing-hallmark/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/09/dear-paris-hilton-shut-up-and-stop-suing-hallmark/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/09/dear-paris-hilton-shut-up-and-stop-suing-hallmark/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,296074,00.html">Paris Hilton has reportedly sued Hallmark</a> for a greeting card that uses a photo of her and her trademarked catch-phrase "That's hot."
<p>Hilton is seeking at least $500,000 in damages and a permanent injunction barring Hallmark from further use of her name, likeness, and catchphrase. She accuses the company of invading her privacy and misappropriating her image.</p>
<p>Yes, it isn't the sex tape that has hurt her privacy. Oh, and what about the innocent people who could have been harmed when Paris drove drunk? What about their rights to privacy/life? No, it's all a Hallmark greeting card.</p>
<p>Paris Hilton is being an idiot with this lawsuit. She's a public figure -- in fact, that's all she is. She's famous for being famous, and has been among the most shameless self-promoters this side of Don King. Given that, she should expect to be satirized, and that's exactly what Hallmark has done.</p>
<p>When <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2007/SHOWBIZ/TV/06/27/king.hilton.transcript/index.html">Hilton went on Larry King</a> after her release from the slammer, Paris talked about her "new outlook on life," and later mentioned her desire to do some good in the world and devote time to philanthropy.</p>
<p>She appears to be back to her old stunts: feeling sorry for herself as a result of her own self-inflicted celebrity. Hey Paris, get on with the charity work you waxed about, and stop being lame.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/09/dear-paris-hilton-shut-up-and-stop-suing-hallmark/">Dear Paris Hilton: Shut up and stop suing Hallmark</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 09 Sep 2007 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/09/dear-paris-hilton-shut-up-and-stop-suing-hallmark/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/984573/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/09/dear-paris-hilton-shut-up-and-stop-suing-hallmark/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>celebrity</category><category>Hallmark</category><category>lawsuits</category><category>Paris Hilton</category><category>privacy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Shocker! Celebs sell magazines!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/14/celebrity-star-power-boosts-magazine-sales/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/14/celebrity-star-power-boosts-magazine-sales/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/14/celebrity-star-power-boosts-magazine-sales/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dj/" rel="tag">Dow Jones and Co (DJ)</a></p><img width="180" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="240" align="right" alt="Valerie &amp; Kirstie Tell All!" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/people.jpg" />Since relocating to New York about a year ago, one of the more surprising realities I can't get over is the sheer ubiquity of celebrities -- they're simply everywhere! Walk through any subway train -- from an Inwood-bound A train to a Z train headed for JFK -- and you'll find those stars and starlets shining down on you. <em>Lindsay! Britney! Paris! Lindsay! Brangelina! TomKat! Lindsay!</em> All gloss and glory, beaming at you from the pages of the ever-present <em>In Touch Weekly</em>.<br /><br />Power lunchers, design majors, single moms, goth queens -- <em>even your own friends and families</em> -- they're all reading these magazines. And don't think it's just women -- fellas are just more sly about it, brandishing blurbs about A-Rod's latest effort while sneaking peeks at <a href="http://www.nypost.com/gossip/gossip.htm">Page Six</a>.<br /><br />Hey, I'm not making this up -- the <a href="http://www.accessabc.com">Audit Bureau of Circulations</a> confirms this celebrity fetish. Figures released yesterday show the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/14/business/media/14mag.html">gossip glossies are flying off the checkout stands</a>.<br /><br /><em>OK! Weekly</em>, put out by Britain's private Northern &amp; Shell -- which also publishes some of London's sauciest fishwraps -- saw circulation bound 54% higher during the first half of the year, selling 809,000 copies per issue. Also reporting jumps in circulation were <em>US Weekly</em> (did you know it was founded by <em><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">The New York Times</a></em> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">NYT</a>)? Thanks, Wikipedia!), <em>In Touch Weekly</em> and <em>Life&amp;Style</em>, the latter two both owned by Germany's Bauer Publishing, Europe's largest private publisher. Alas, BloggingStocks' distant <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) relative, <em>People</em>, slipped 2%, though it remains proudly at the top of the heap, with more than 3.7 million copies of each issue sold. <br /><br /><em>Time</em>, another corporate cousin, saw its genre-leading circulation drop by 700,000 -- apparently owing to its excision of promotional tie-ins that weren't pulling their weight and a redirection away from waiting room subscriptions. Circulation for newsweekly challengers and financial magazines stood pat, with the curious exception of the enigmatic London weekly, <em>The Economist</em>, which posted a 15.5% jump!<strong><br /><br /></strong>So what's on the uptick? Stoic, faceless financial analysis <em>and </em>paparazzi pap! Wrap your head around that.<br /><br />Magazine sales in general held steady year over year, which is more than the Audit Bureau can say for the newspaper industry, unfortunately. Predictably, among the few major papers to post higher sales in the <a href="http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F30B10F9385A0C728CDDAC0894DF404482&amp;n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fOrganizations%2fA%2fAudit%20Bureau%20of%20Circulations">most recent newspapers report</a> were the tabloid <em>New York Daily News</em> and its rival, <em>The New York Post</em>, owned by Rupert Murdoch's <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corp</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>), the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/31/Dow%20Jones-says-yes-to-murdoch-pressure-mounts-on-other-media-companies/">new guardian of <em>The Wall Street Journal</em></a>.<br /><br />Perhaps fearing Jessica Simpson pinups in Rupert's new plaything (<em>Item!</em>), fans of the <em>Journal</em>'s gravitas are flocking to <em>The Economist</em>'s stuffy pastures.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/14/celebrity-star-power-boosts-magazine-sales/">Shocker! Celebs sell magazines!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 14 Aug 2007 19:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/14/business/media/14mag.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/14/celebrity-star-power-boosts-magazine-sales/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/965171/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/14/celebrity-star-power-boosts-magazine-sales/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Britney Spears</category><category>celebrities</category><category>featured</category><category>gossip</category><category>Lindsay Lohan</category><category>magazine sales</category><category>magazines</category><category>New York Times</category><category>News Corp</category><category>newspaper sales</category><category>NWS</category><category>NYT</category><category>Paris Hilton</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Barry Summerlin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 19:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hey GM! Paris Hilton wants to talk to you about Hummers...]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/07/hey-gm-paris-hilton-wants-to-talk-to-you-about-hummers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/07/hey-gm-paris-hilton-wants-to-talk-to-you-about-hummers/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/07/hey-gm-paris-hilton-wants-to-talk-to-you-about-hummers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hd/" rel="tag">Home Depot (HD)</a></p><img width="150" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="107" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/paris.jpg" />When Paris talks, people listen. Or at least branding executives do. And let's be clear, Paris doesn't know much, but she sure knows Hummers. <br /><br />I'm talking about the other kind of Hummer here, boys. The big, garish gas-guzzling ones on wheels. But Paris is eco-savvy. Paris wants a hybrid. A hybrid Hummer. And a cute one, too. Maybe in green. <br /><br />Of course, as our sister blog <a href="http://www.autobloggreen.com/2007/08/07/paris-hilton-is-getting-a-hybrid-hummer-designed/">AutoBlog Green</a> points out, that kind of car doesn't exist. Yet.<br /><br />What do you think, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>)? Gonna make it happen? Think of the publicity. Or heck, think of the commercial! It would, pardon the pun, blow that Carl's Junior commercial right out of the water. Tongues would wag! <br /><br />After all, now that <a href="http://gm.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/03/surprise-americans-like-foreign-cars-more-than-their-own/">more Americans prefer foreign made cars</a>, the Big Three had better bring out the big guns and prove they're really back on track. Maybe GM can design and roll one out just in time for $100 oil, too. <br /><br />Although on second thought, maybe a Paris Hilton Hummer wouldn't be such a branding success story. Maybe it would be right up there with Cerberus hiring former <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-home-depot-inc/hd/nys">Home Depot </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-home-depot-inc/hd/nys">HD</a>) Bob Nardelli to <a href="http://hd.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/06/why-did-cerberus-ask-fired-home-depot-hd-ceo-bob-nardelli-to-r/">fix what ails Chrysler.</a><br /><br />What do you think?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/07/hey-gm-paris-hilton-wants-to-talk-to-you-about-hummers/">Hey GM! Paris Hilton wants to talk to you about Hummers...</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 07 Aug 2007 15:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autobloggreen.com/2007/08/07/paris-hilton-is-getting-a-hybrid-hummer-designed/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/07/hey-gm-paris-hilton-wants-to-talk-to-you-about-hummers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/960053/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/07/hey-gm-paris-hilton-wants-to-talk-to-you-about-hummers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bob Nardelli</category><category>BobNardelli</category><category>featured</category><category>GM</category><category>GM hybrids</category><category>GmHybrids</category><category>Green cars</category><category>GreenCars</category><category>HD</category><category>Hummers</category><category>Hybrid Hummer</category><category>HybridHummer</category><category>Hybrids</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Paris Hilton</category><category>ParisHilton</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Julie Tilsner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 15:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why the Michael Vick dog chew toy is freakin' brilliant]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/07/why-the-michael-vick-dog-chew-toy-is-freakin-brilliant/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/07/why-the-michael-vick-dog-chew-toy-is-freakin-brilliant/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/07/why-the-michael-vick-dog-chew-toy-is-freakin-brilliant/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p><p><img height="233" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/mikevicktoyv2.jpg" width="200" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /> The Michael Vick dog chew toy is so brilliant in its simplicity that I am kicking myself for not having thought of it myself.</p>
<p>I mean, what better way is there for dogs and their owners to register their disgust over the dog-fighting allegations against the Atlanta Falcons quarterback. My hat's off to the anonymous entrepreneurs, who the <em><a href="http://www.ajc.com/sports/content/sports/falcons/stories/2007/08/06/0807_chewtoy.html">Atlanta Journal-Constitution</a></em> says are based in Jacksonville, Florida. </p>
<p>Apparently, the people behind the toy were going to donate the proceeds to the Jacksonville Humane Society but somehow that got messed up because of what the <a href="http://www.vickdogchewtoy.com/">website</a> describes as "squabbling over charitable donations." The toy's makers are promising to donate their proceeds anonymously. I've contacted the website and will let you know if I get a response.</p>
<p>The toy sells for $7.99 and is made out of "state-of-the-art dog material," whatever that means. It also promises to withstand "the most playful of dog destruction."</p>
<p>By the way, there's little if anything that Vick could do to stop the toy since it's satire and clearly doesn't imply his endorsement. The NFL star is learning what many celebrities, including Paris Hilton, Nicole Richie and Lindsay Lohan already know: Fame is a bitch.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/07/why-the-michael-vick-dog-chew-toy-is-freakin-brilliant/">Why the Michael Vick dog chew toy is freakin' brilliant</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 07 Aug 2007 14:16:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ajc.com/sports/content/sports/falcons/stories/2007/08/06/0807_chewtoy.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/07/why-the-michael-vick-dog-chew-toy-is-freakin-brilliant/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/960013/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/07/why-the-michael-vick-dog-chew-toy-is-freakin-brilliant/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>altanta falcons</category><category>AltantaFalcons</category><category>dog</category><category>dog toys</category><category>dogfighting</category><category>dogs</category><category>DogToys</category><category>featured</category><category>lindsay lohan</category><category>LindsayLohan</category><category>michael vick</category><category>michael vick case</category><category>michael vick chew toy</category><category>michael vick chewtoy</category><category>MichaelVick</category><category>MichaelVickCase</category><category>MichaelVickChewToy</category><category>nfl</category><category>nicole richie</category><category>NicoleRichie</category><category>paris hilton</category><category>ParisHilton</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 14:16:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[UCLA student gets Paris Hilton's digits]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/09/ucla-student-gets-paris-hiltons-digits/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/09/ucla-student-gets-paris-hiltons-digits/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/09/ucla-student-gets-paris-hiltons-digits/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a></p><p><img width="159" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="215" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/paris-hilton-celibate.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>And you thought you got a lot of annoying phone calls from telemarketers and the like. UCLA student Shira Barlow received a new phone number from her wireless provider after she broke her phone, but there was just one problem: It wasn't a new number. It was a recycled number and not too long ago, it had belonged to Paris Hilton.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.eonline.com/news/article/index.jsp?uuid=8e5e7e88-2d40-4260-8fb0-baa2b4b5756e">According to E! News</a>, Ms. Barlow received text messages and phone calls from Paris's friends asking for information about parties, and they also offered their support for her during her upcoming stay in jail. Once the heiress was in jail of course, the calls tapered off. After her appearance on Larry King, Barlow received a text saying that "It's disgusting how they treated you in there, but once again you have showed the world that you can do anything."</p>
<p>Interestingly, Barlow has opted not to change her number, <a href="http://www.kansascity.com/news/nation/story/181404.html">according to the Los Angeles Times</a>, because the messages from Paris's friends have been more entertaining than annoying.<br /><br />I wonder how many people would opt not to change their numbers. I'm guessing most young people would get a kick out of "being" Paris Hilton, at least on the phone. It's fun to feel like a celebrity.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/09/ucla-student-gets-paris-hiltons-digits/">UCLA student gets Paris Hilton's digits</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 09 Jul 2007 07:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.eonline.com/news/article/index.jsp?uuid=8e5e7e88-2d40-4260-8fb0-baa2b4b5756e>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/09/ucla-student-gets-paris-hiltons-digits/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/935598/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/09/ucla-student-gets-paris-hiltons-digits/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Cell Phone</category><category>CellPhone</category><category>Paris Hilton</category><category>ParisHilton</category><category>Phones</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 07:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Option update 7-3-07: Blackstone purchasing Hilton]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/04/option-update-7-3-07-blackstone-purchasing-hilton/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/04/option-update-7-3-07-blackstone-purchasing-hilton/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/04/option-update-7-3-07-blackstone-purchasing-hilton/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hlt/" rel="tag">Hilton Hotels (HLT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hot/" rel="tag">Starwood Hotels Worldwide (HOT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mar/" rel="tag">Marriott Intl'A' (MAR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bx/" rel="tag">Blackstone Group L.P (BX)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hilton-hotels-corporation/hlt/nys"><strong><img align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" /></strong><strong>Hilton</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hilton-hotels-corporation/hlt/nys">HLT</a>) volatility and volume elevated prior to Blackstone paying $26 billion. HLT announced <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-blackstone-group-l-p/bx/nys">Blackstone Group</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-blackstone-group-l-p/bx/nys">BX</a>) will acquire all the outstanding common stock of HLT for $47.50 per share. HLT closed at $36.05. I reported near the close of trading on 7/3/07 "option volume &amp; volatility Elevated as HLT rallies 6%." HLT total volume of 32,490 contracts and HLT July option implied volatility of 39 was aggressive, above its 26-week average of 31 according to Track Data, suggesting larger risk. </p>
<p><em>Daily Option Update is provided by Stock Options Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com.</em><br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/04/option-update-7-3-07-blackstone-purchasing-hilton/">Option update 7-3-07: Blackstone purchasing Hilton</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 04 Jul 2007 06:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/04/option-update-7-3-07-blackstone-purchasing-hilton/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/932854/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/04/option-update-7-3-07-blackstone-purchasing-hilton/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Blackstone Group</category><category>BlackstoneGroup</category><category>Equity Office</category><category>EquityOffice</category><category>Hilton</category><category>option implied volatility</category><category>option volume</category><category>OptionImpliedVolatility</category><category>OptionVolume</category><category>Paris</category><category>Paris Hilton</category><category>ParisHilton</category><category>Peter Peterson</category><category>PeterPeterson</category><category>Sam Zell</category><category>SamZell</category><category>Stephen Bollenbach</category><category>Stephen Schwarzman</category><category>StephenBollenbach</category><category>StephenSchwarzman</category><category>Stock Options Specialist</category><category>StockOptionsSpecialist</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 06:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Paris Hilton invoked in Topps buyout feud? Bill Gross talks about Paris too?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/paris-hilton-invoked-in-topps-buyout-feud-bill-gross-talks-abou/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/paris-hilton-invoked-in-topps-buyout-feud-bill-gross-talks-abou/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/paris-hilton-invoked-in-topps-buyout-feud-bill-gross-talks-abou/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a></p><p><img style="WIDTH: 153px; HEIGHT: 194px" height="250" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/hilton_mug_shot.jpg" width="200" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></p>
<p>As the <a href="http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/06/27/go-shopping-like-paris-hilton/">New York Times Dealbook</a> pointed out yesterday, references to Paris Hilton and jokes at her expense have become all too widespread of late. For that reason, this post will endeavor to contain only a modest number of Paris Hilton jokes.</p>
<p>Bill Gross, the once-proud bond guru at PIMCO, mentioned Paris Hilton three times in his <a href="http://www.pimco.com/LeftNav/Featured+Market+Commentary/IO/2007/IO+July+2007.htm">July Investment Outlook</a>:</p>
<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 120%; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; mso-font-width: 95%"><em>Whew, that was a close one! Ugly for a few days I guess, but it could have been much worse! No, I refer not to Paris Hilton upon her initial release from the LA County pokey after serving three days of hard time, but to the Bear Stearns/subprime crisis.</em></span></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/paris-hilton-invoked-in-topps-buyout-feud-bill-gross-talks-abou/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Paris Hilton invoked in Topps buyout feud? Bill Gross talks about Paris too?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/paris-hilton-invoked-in-topps-buyout-feud-bill-gross-talks-abou/">Paris Hilton invoked in Topps buyout feud? Bill Gross talks about Paris too?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 28 Jun 2007 18:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/06/27/go-shopping-like-paris-hilton/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/paris-hilton-invoked-in-topps-buyout-feud-bill-gross-talks-abou/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/928498/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/paris-hilton-invoked-in-topps-buyout-feud-bill-gross-talks-abou/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bill Gross</category><category>BillGross</category><category>Paris Hilton</category><category>ParisHilton</category><category>TOPP</category><category>Topps</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 18:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Learning Annex offers Paris Hilton a teaching job]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/26/the-learning-annex-offers-paris-hilton-a-teaching-job/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/26/the-learning-annex-offers-paris-hilton-a-teaching-job/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/26/the-learning-annex-offers-paris-hilton-a-teaching-job/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/learningannex.gif" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /></p>
<p>TMZ.com is reporting that heiress turned jailbird Paris Hilton has been offered $1 million to present a one-hour course at the The Learning Annex Real Estate and Wealth Expos in Seattle, Chicago, New York and Boston. The subject of the class would reportedly be "How to build your brand."</p>
<p>For a normal provider of education, hiring Paris Hilton as a teacher would probably be seen as something of a credibility killer. Not so for The Learning Annex. If you haven't seen the late-night infomercials, the Real Estate and Wealth Expos feature gurus including self-promoters like Robert Kiyosaki and Donald Trump, and convicted robber Russ Whitney. So The Learning Annex has a reputation slightly above that of O.J. Simpson.</p>
<p>But I'm not just writing this to knock on The Learning Annex. That's already been done before, <a href="http://216.239.51.104/search?q=cache:KuVbyxdtdFQJ:www.johntreed.com/Reedgururating.html+%22THE+LEARNING+ANNEX%22+%22JOHN+T+REED%22&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;cd=1&amp;gl=us">most notably</a> by the real estate guru's guru John T. Reed.</p>
<p>Actually, a seminar on branding by Paris Hilton might actually be less ridiculous than a seminar on real estate by Robert Kiyosaki. Paris Hilton was able to license her name to a brand of perfume, without any tangible success as anything other than being Paris Hilton. Robert Kiyosaki on the other hand, appears to have <a href="http://www.johntreed.com/Kiyosaki.html">little in the way of a track record of success</a> in anything other than building a brand around his own name. I would argue that the same is true of Donald Trump.</p>
<p>So while the idea of Paris Hilton teaching a class at a real estate and wealth expo might seem crazy, I would say she's more qualified to teach that class than a lot of the current faculty are to teach about real estate and wealth.</p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/26/the-learning-annex-offers-paris-hilton-a-teaching-job/">The Learning Annex offers Paris Hilton a teaching job</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 26 Jun 2007 21:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.tmz.com/2007/06/25/professor-paris-coming-to-a-city-near-you/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/26/the-learning-annex-offers-paris-hilton-a-teaching-job/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/927409/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/26/the-learning-annex-offers-paris-hilton-a-teaching-job/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Paris Hilton</category><category>ParisHilton</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 21:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Paris without a network; schadenfreude ensues]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/paris-without-a-network-schadenfreude-ensues/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/paris-without-a-network-schadenfreude-ensues/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/paris-without-a-network-schadenfreude-ensues/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hlt/" rel="tag">Hilton Hotels (HLT)</a></p><img height="195" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/hilton.jpg" width="240" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Last week, I went on a <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/21/nbc-finds-pariss-drivel-worth-a-hot-million/">bit of a rant</a> after learning from <em>The New York Post </em>that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) NBC Networks was considering shelling out $1 million to book Paris Hilton's first post-prison interview. Evidently, the <em>Post </em>was misinformed; late last week, NBC officials denied this claim. Now the other major networks - <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Walt Disney's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">DIS</a>) ABC (employer of Hilton family friend Barbara Walters) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation-cl-b/cbs/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CBS Corp.'s</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation-cl-b/cbs/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CBS</a>) eponymous network have all <a href="http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-et-parismillion,1,3484245.story?ctrack=1&amp;cset=true" target="_blank">abandoned thoughts of an interview </a>with the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hilton-hotels-corporation/hlt/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Hilton Hotels</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hilton-hotels-corporation/hlt/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">HLT</a>) heiress. <br /><br />A piece in <em>The L.A. Times </em>over the weekend noted that the decision across the 3 major networks came after an "intense jostling" between the "news" divisions for a sit-down with the socialite, who will be released from incarceration sometime today after serving a stint for probation violations related to a drunken-driving charge. <br /><br />Talking heads with the networks are scrambling to defend the integrity of their organizations. A spokeswoman with NBC noted that "NBC News doesn't pay for interviews, period," while a former senior vice president with the Peacock network's news division implied that no one should benefit financially from a stint in jail. <br /><br /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">TWX</a>) unit CNN has now reportedly booked Hilton for a sit-down with Larry King, but is offering no compensation. According to a (free) statement offered from behind bars to Ryan Seacrest, Paris now answers to a higher power than money. "I think that God makes everything happen for a reason," she told the entertainment-news correspondent, "and this is my time to figure out what my purpose is in life." <br /><br /><em>Beth Gaston Moon is an analyst at </em><a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/"><em>Schaeffer's Investment Research</em></a><em>.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/paris-without-a-network-schadenfreude-ensues/">Paris without a network; schadenfreude ensues</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-et-parismillion,1,3484245.story?ctrack=1&amp;cset=true>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/paris-without-a-network-schadenfreude-ensues/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/925725/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/paris-without-a-network-schadenfreude-ensues/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ABC</category><category>DIS</category><category>GE</category><category>HLT</category><category>NBC</category><category>Paris Hilton</category><category>ParisHilton</category><category>television</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Media World: What's wrong with Paris Hilton selling her story?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/23/media-world-whats-wrong-with-paris-hilton-selling-her-story/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/23/media-world-whats-wrong-with-paris-hilton-selling-her-story/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/23/media-world-whats-wrong-with-paris-hilton-selling-her-story/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a></p><p>I don't blame Paris Hilton and her family for trying to sell their story. </p>
<p>After all, why should multinational conglomerates be the only ones who get rich off her misfortune? Why shouldn't the supposedly stupid blond heiress get a piece of the action?</p>
<p>Brian Montopoli wonders on <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation-cl-b/cbs/nys">CBS Corp</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation-cl-b/cbs/nys">CBS</a>) <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2007/06/22/publiceye/entry2968421.shtml">PublicEye</a> blog whether paying for an interview with Hilton would be the worst thing in the world.</p>
<p>"Why don't they just pay for these interviews and then disclose that they've done so to their audience? " he writes. "Wouldn't that ultimately be more journalistically honest -- and even, on this skewed scale, more ethical."</p>
<p>Good point.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/23/media-world-whats-wrong-with-paris-hilton-selling-her-story/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Media World: What's wrong with Paris Hilton selling her story?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/23/media-world-whats-wrong-with-paris-hilton-selling-her-story/">Media World: What's wrong with Paris Hilton selling her story?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 23 Jun 2007 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://dis.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/22/cbs-wins-ad-war-but-nbc-scores-paris-hilton-interview/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/23/media-world-whats-wrong-with-paris-hilton-selling-her-story/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/924645/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/23/media-world-whats-wrong-with-paris-hilton-selling-her-story/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>abc</category><category>Brian Montopoli</category><category>BrianMontopoli</category><category>cbs</category><category>celebrity blogs</category><category>CelebrityBlogs</category><category>dis</category><category>Disney</category><category>exclusive interviews</category><category>ExclusiveInterviews</category><category>ge</category><category>journalistic integrity</category><category>JournalisticIntegrity</category><category>media ethics</category><category>MediaEthics</category><category>nbc</category><category>paid interviews</category><category>paris hilton</category><category>Paris Hilton interview</category><category>ParisHilton</category><category>PublicEye</category><category>PublicEye blog</category><category>Walt Disney</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CBS wins ad war, but NBC scores Paris Hilton interview]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/22/cbs-wins-ad-war-but-nbc-scores-paris-hilton-interview/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/22/cbs-wins-ad-war-but-nbc-scores-paris-hilton-interview/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/22/cbs-wins-ad-war-but-nbc-scores-paris-hilton-interview/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/paris-hilton-declares-zero.jpg" /><a href="http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=118684">According to <em>Advertising Age</em></a>, the wake for broadcast television networks will be delayed a bit. Last week the big four finished pre-sale of advertising for the next season, and their estimated haul of $9.2 billion is up about 5% over the 2006-7 season.<br /><br />Leading the pack was <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation-cl-b/cbs/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CBS Corp</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation-cl-b/cbs/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CBS</a>) at $2.45 billion, followed closely by ABC (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Walt Disney</a>, NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">DIS</a>). NBC (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">General Electric</a>'s NBC (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">GE</a>) lagging badly in ratings all season, brought home only $1.8 billion, finishing behind Fox (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">News Corp</a>, NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">NWS</a>) at $1.9 billion.<br /><br />I'd guess it was these results that caused NBC to break the piggy bank open yesterday to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/22/arts/television/22paris.html?_r=1&amp;th&amp;emc=th&amp;oref=slogin">win the Paris Hilton stakes</a>. According to the <em>New York Times</em>, ABC's bid of $100,000 for the fleshpot's first post-jail interview was trounced by NBC. According to the <em>Times</em>, Barbara Walters said NBC offered in excess of $750,000 for the interview, to be conducted by the Today Show's Meredith Vieira. <br /><br />If Ms. Hilton is not, as she claims, as dumb as she appears, she might realize $750 grand will cover the cost of one hell of a good chauffeur. And a few pair of BVDs.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/22/cbs-wins-ad-war-but-nbc-scores-paris-hilton-interview/">CBS wins ad war, but NBC scores Paris Hilton interview</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 22 Jun 2007 09:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=118684>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/22/cbs-wins-ad-war-but-nbc-scores-paris-hilton-interview/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/924044/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/22/cbs-wins-ad-war-but-nbc-scores-paris-hilton-interview/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>abc</category><category>advertising</category><category>Barbara Walters</category><category>Barbara)</category><category>cbs</category><category>dis</category><category>Fox</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>Hilton</category><category>nbc</category><category>Newscorp</category><category>nws</category><category>Paris Hilton</category><category>Paris Hilton interview</category><category>Paris interview</category><category>television advertising</category><category>Upfront</category><category>Walt Disney</category><category>WaltDisney</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Barlow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 09:55:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
