Paul Allen posts
FeedPosted Dec 24th 2008 12:30PM by Trey Thoelcke (RSS feed)
Filed under: Google (GOOG), Microsoft (MSFT), Apple Inc (AAPL), Dell (DELL), eBay (EBAY), Amazon.com (AMZN), Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A), Sears Holdings (SHLD), Amer Intl Group (AIG), Oracle Corp (ORCL), News Corp'B' (NWS), Blackstone Group L.P (BX)
This post is part of our feature on Money Losers of 2008. See all 20.
There's no doubt about it -- times are tough. People are struggling to find work and to pay the bills as the value of their homes and savings dwindle. The poor get poorer, and the rich get richer.
Or do they? It's all relative, of course, but world's billionaires have been taking some big hits too. We take a look at Sheldon Adelson, Kirk Kerkorian, and Lakshmi Mittal in their own separate posts, but here are some other billionaires who have lost billions this year (courtesy of Forbes and Business Sheet).
- Brothers Anil and Mukesh Ambani of India's private conglomerate Reliance lost $32.5 billion and $28.2 billion, respectively.
- Warren Buffett, the Sage of Omaha, lost $16.5 billion. Shares of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (NYSE: BRK.A) are down about 32% since the beginning of the year.
- Microsoft (NYSE: MSFT) founders Bill Gates and Paul Allen lost $12.3 billion and $2.6 billion, respectively, while CEO Steve Balmer lost $6.5 billion. Shares of Microsoft are down 46% since the beginning of the year.
- Larry Page and Sergey Brin, cofounders of Google Inc. (NYSE: GOOG), lost $11.9 billion and $11.7 billion, respectively, and CEO Eric Schmidt lost $3.8 billion. The share price of Google has fallen 55% since the beginning of the year.
- Larry Ellison, CEO of Oracle Corp. (NASDAQ: ORCL), lost $8.2 billion. Shares of Oracle are down 21% since the beginning of the year.
- Media maven Sumner Redstone lost $7.2 billion. Shares of his private investment firm National Amusements fell 70% this year.
Continue reading Money losers of 2008: Billionaires who lost billions this year
Posted Jun 10th 2008 4:53PM by Steven Mallas (RSS feed)
Filed under: General Electric (GE), Walt Disney (DIS), Viacom (VIA), News Corp'B' (NWS)
Steven Spielberg wants to reboot the DreamWorks brand, according to this article. He's not happy being at Viacom's (NYSE: VIA) Paramount and not having full ownership of his films. What he wants to do now is see if he can summon $1 billion in financing to catalyze this new phase in his life.
Of course, the phrase "see if he can" is probably not the most accurate one to use when talking about Spielberg. When it comes to Hollywood, his word is scripture, and if he asks for financing, he'll have more takers than he can handle. After raising his billion bucks, Spielberg needs to decide which studio will be a perfect home for his new celluloid ambitions. Although the article states that there is a possibility he can land anywhere, to me, there's no ambiguity whatsoever.
Spielberg will end up at General Electric's (NYSE: GE) Universal (if I could be as sure about the price of oil as I am about Spielberg and Universal, I'd be a rich, rich man). He and his Amblin shingle have had a long relationship with Universal, and simply put, that's where he wants to be. It's funny to consider Disney (NYSE: DIS) and News Corp. (NYSE: NWS) as potential new homes for DreamWorks. Disney definitely wouldn't want him since the Mouse is being very conservative in terms of film making, and although News Corp. would love to overpay for him (I think News Corp. enjoys overpaying for things at times), I just don't see Spielberg going to Fox.
Continue reading Should Steven Spielberg go public?
Posted Oct 9th 2007 8:00PM by Julie Tilsner (RSS feed)
Filed under: Television, Internet, Blogs, General Electric (GE), Media World, Film

Call it "Girls Gone Mild." In 2000, Geraldine Laybourne, the former president of the Nickelodeon network for children, and Oprah Winfrey, who needs no introduction, got together to launch a media empire focused on women -- called Oxygen. The idea was to create synergies between TV and the internet.
Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ:
MSFT) founder Paul Allen liked the idea enough he helped back the venture.
But the dreams never matched the reality. The sexiness of the idea -- a woman's media empire! -- never lived up to its potential. And today, NBC, a unit of
General Electric (NYSE:
GE), announced that it
would buy Oxygen Media for $925 million.Continue reading Oprah has left the building: NBC Universal (GE) buys Oxygen Media
Posted Aug 16th 2007 9:00AM by Douglas McIntyre (RSS feed)
Filed under: SEC Filings, Rumors
In a filing with the SEC, billionaire Paul Allen has mentioned that he may want to take cable firm Charter Communications (NASDAQ: CHTR) private.
It is hard to see how he could manage that. The company has over $19 billion in debt and a market cap of over $1 billion. In the trailing four quarters, the company has only had about $550 million in operating income.
Allen will not be able to refinance the debt at better rates in such a tough credit environment. His management at Charter has spent the last two years restructuring the balance sheet to improve debt service. And, they have done a good job, so the payment picture for that pool is not going to get any better.
Selling the company would probably be hard. Even with some savings, no other large cable company will be able to offset the need to come up with $25 billion or more to buy a company with $1.5 billion in revenue.
Unless Allen wants to pay hundreds of millions of dollars each year to make sure that Charter does not default, the company isn't going private.
Posted Aug 7th 2007 1:25PM by Kevin Kelly (RSS feed)
Filed under: Management, Microsoft (MSFT)
The
LA Times is
reporting that Paul Allen, co-founder of
Microsoft (NASDAQ:
MSFT), is selling the majority of his stake in
DreamWorks Animations (NYSE:
DWA). His sale of 10-12 million shares in a company he founded probably raises some eyebrows and begs the question as to why he's selling out now.
Paul Allen has attributed this move simply to "part of an ongoing effort to rebalance." Interestingly, Allen
said he also plans on leaving the company's board. While his exact reason is not given, one could presume it's due to the fact that he will now own less than one-half of what he owned when he was on the board.
It should come as no surprise that the stock has sold off about 7% so far today on this news. First off, the market is going to have increased supply of the stock until his shares are purchased by the market. This should create a mental ceiling for share prices as investors and traders will remain worried about "flooding" the market with supply. The worries that could be construed due to Allen's recent moves are also likely to weigh down the shares until the situation has blown over.