BloggingStocks http://www.bloggingstocks.com BloggingStocks http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/feedlogo.gif BloggingStocks http://www.bloggingstocks.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/<![CDATA[Paul Krugman: China needs to end its fixed currency policy]]>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/paul-krugman-china-needs-to-end-its-fixed-currency-policy/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/paul-krugman-china-needs-to-end-its-fixed-currency-policy/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/16/paul-krugman-china-needs-to-end-its-fixed-currency-policy/#commentsFiled under: , ,

New York Times ( NYT) columnist Paul Krugman argues quite persuasively that China needs to reconsider its fixed/tight band currency policy, and soon.

Krugman argues that not only is China encouraging the continuance of a key structural imbalance in the global economy - one that helped cause the world's first global recession since the end of World War II - it's also increasing unemployment in other nations.

Continue reading Paul Krugman: China needs to end its fixed currency policy

Paul Krugman: China needs to end its fixed currency policy originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:20:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>CongressimportsinthenewsPaul KrugmanMon, 16 Nov 2009 16:20:00 EST<![CDATA[Fiscal stimulus package's primary flaw: It was too small]]>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/fiscal-stimlulus-packages-primary-flaw-it-was-too-small/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/fiscal-stimlulus-packages-primary-flaw-it-was-too-small/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/fiscal-stimlulus-packages-primary-flaw-it-was-too-small/#commentsFiled under: , , ,

New York Times (NYSE: NYT) columnist Paul Krugman argues quite persuasively that the major problem with the fiscal stimulus package was that it was too small, given the financial crisis and the large economic crater the accompanying, pronounced recession created.

Further, the fiscal stimulus' many benefits -- including substantial job retention in essential public services such as education -- are harder to see and not likely to translate into too much political gain for President Obama and Congressional Democrats, he said. That's consistent with a political science axiom -- often repeated by U.S. Rep. Barney Frank, D-Massachusetts -- that "Congress gets little credit or benefit for averting something." Indeed, retained jobs are hard to see, and the fact that a local public school system is is still operating with as many teachers is an accomplishment, but one that most American voters will take for granted, and not give Democrats credit for.

Continue reading Fiscal stimulus package's primary flaw: It was too small

Fiscal stimulus package's primary flaw: It was too small originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>Democratsfiscal stimulusGDPinthenewsjobsPaul KrugmanRepublicansU.S. economyMon, 02 Nov 2009 17:30:00 EST<![CDATA[Krugman sees slow, painful global recovery on trade woes]]>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/21/krugman-sees-slow-painful-global-recovery-on-trade-woes/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/21/krugman-sees-slow-painful-global-recovery-on-trade-woes/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/21/krugman-sees-slow-painful-global-recovery-on-trade-woes/#commentsFiled under:

New York Times (NYSE: NYT) columnist Paul Krugman, who has previously expressed concern about governments withdrawing fiscal and/or monetary stimulus too quickly, resulting in a stall of the just-started recovery, Monday provided more reason to stay-the-course.

Krugman, a Nobel Prize winner, did say in Helsinki Monday that the global recession has probably bottomed but the recovery will be "slow and painful," Bloomberg News reported.

Continue reading Krugman sees slow, painful global recovery on trade woes

Krugman sees slow, painful global recovery on trade woes originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>Paul KrugmanMon, 21 Sep 2009 18:30:00 EST<![CDATA[Do we need a second stimulus to fend off stagnation?]]>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/11/do-we-need-a-second-stimulus-to-fend-off-stagnation/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/11/do-we-need-a-second-stimulus-to-fend-off-stagnation/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/11/do-we-need-a-second-stimulus-to-fend-off-stagnation/#commentsFiled under: ,

Do we need a second stimulus? Nobel Prize winner Paul Krugman thinks so.

If we take a page from history, Japan languished in never-never land for about ten years after the stock market crash of the early 1990s. Its economy remained stagnant. Some analysts say that reason for the stagnation was the lack of enough stimulus to pull it out of recession.

Continue reading Do we need a second stimulus to fend off stagnation?

Do we need a second stimulus to fend off stagnation? originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:10:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>bail outseconomic recoveryinthenewsJapanPaul KrugmanstagnationstimulusunemploymentTue, 11 Aug 2009 12:10:00 EST<![CDATA[Green shoots scenario: Krugman calls recovery]]>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/08/green-shoots-scenario-krugman-calls-recovery/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/08/green-shoots-scenario-krugman-calls-recovery/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/08/green-shoots-scenario-krugman-calls-recovery/#commentsFiled under: , ,

Summer is here and green shoots are popping up everywhere. Paul Krugman calls a recovery by September, a very fast turnaround for someone who has been very bearish. Taiwan exports hit a six-month high last month, sparking hopes that the electronics industry is set for a recovery -- a nice high multiplier economics shift.

Meanwhile, what's good for General Mills (NYS: GIS) is good for America and the cereal maker upped guidance, implying a bottom in consumer staples and that, at the very least, cutbacks in purchases of essentials reported in the latest spending numbers are overblown.

Alex Salkever is the Director of Research at Piqqem.com, a stock prediction and analysis community powered by the Wisdom of Crowds.

Green shoots scenario: Krugman calls recovery originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Mon, 08 Jun 2009 17:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>general millsGeneralMillsKrugmanpaul krugmanPaulKrugmanrecessionrecoveryMon, 08 Jun 2009 17:00:00 EST<![CDATA[With $1.6 trillion to go in AIG's bailout, it's time to trim Wall Street's power]]>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/27/with-1-6-trillion-to-go-in-aigs-bailout-its-time-to-trim-wal/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/27/with-1-6-trillion-to-go-in-aigs-bailout-its-time-to-trim-wal/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/27/with-1-6-trillion-to-go-in-aigs-bailout-its-time-to-trim-wal/#commentsFiled under: , , ,

Wall Street is supposed to be a support function -- helping CEOs come up with cash to make investments. But since Ronald Reagan, Wall Street has become the tail that wags the economic dog.

Today, Paul Krugman highlighted this by pointing out that in the 1960s, Wall Street accounted for 4% of GDP -- a figure that rose to 8% by 2007. Reagan began a process of deregulating Wall Street and in 2004, the SEC let financial institutions borrow way too much. The result is an unprecedented economic catastrophe, including an American International Group (NYSE: AIG) bailout that will cost another $1.6 trillion.

Continue reading With $1.6 trillion to go in AIG's bailout, it's time to trim Wall Street's power

With $1.6 trillion to go in AIG's bailout, it's time to trim Wall Street's power originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>AIGAndrew CuomoAndrewCuomobailoutfeaturedgsPaul KrugmanPaulKrugmanFri, 27 Mar 2009 13:30:00 EST<![CDATA[The Geithner Private-Public Partnership: The cure may be worse than the disease! ]]>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/24/the-geithner-private-public-partnership-the-cure-may-be-worse-t/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/24/the-geithner-private-public-partnership-the-cure-may-be-worse-t/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/24/the-geithner-private-public-partnership-the-cure-may-be-worse-t/#commentsFiled under: , , , ,

As more details were unveiled yesterday about the Public-Private Partnership proposed by Secretary Timothy Geithner to deal with the "Toxic Assets" currently on the balance sheets of many of the major banks, the equity markets around the world experience what can only be described as euphoria. Equity markets in the United States experienced one of the biggest one-day rallies in history. Obviously, Wall Street likes the plan at first glance.

However, Paul Krugman, the liberal Noble Prize winner, wrote an editorial in The New York Times attacking the plan as "Cash for Trash." Subsequently, Newt Gingrich, the former Republican Speaker of the House, announced on Fox News that he agreed with Professor Krugman. When senior figures on both left and right agree, it may be wise to look past the euphoria.


Continue reading The Geithner Private-Public Partnership: The cure may be worse than the disease!

The Geithner Private-Public Partnership: The cure may be worse than the disease! originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:20:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>GeithnerinthenewsNewt GingrichNewtGingrichPaul KrugmanPaulKrugmanTreasuryTue, 24 Mar 2009 15:20:00 EST<![CDATA[If the U.S. economy strengthens, Fiscal Stimulus II may be shelved]]>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/11/if-the-u-s-economy-strengthens-fiscal-stimulus-ii-may-be-shelv/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/11/if-the-u-s-economy-strengthens-fiscal-stimulus-ii-may-be-shelv/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/11/if-the-u-s-economy-strengthens-fiscal-stimulus-ii-may-be-shelv/#commentsFiled under: ,

In his column last week, New York Times (NYSE: NYT) columnist and Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman laid waste to those who argue that he's not critically assessing Obama administration programs. He offered a cogent critique of the U.S. Treasury's tardiness regarding the banking system fix.

Either temporarily nationalize those banks that are clogging the system, buy the toxic assets at unsubsidized prices, or announce some other market-valued removal plan to unclog the system, but let's put this train in motion, Krugman said, in so many words, to get to the root of the matter: We need to get credit flowing freely to facilitate commerce.

Continue reading If the U.S. economy strengthens, Fiscal Stimulus II may be shelved

If the U.S. economy strengthens, Fiscal Stimulus II may be shelved originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:15:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>banking sectorCongressDemocratsfeaturedfiscal policyfiscal stimulus packageNew York Times op-edNewYorkTimesOp-edObama administrationPaul KrugmanRepublicanstoxic assetsU.S. economyWed, 11 Mar 2009 12:15:00 EST<![CDATA[NYT's Krugman: Now is really the time for Congress to choose correctly ]]>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/08/nyts-krugman-now-is-really-the-time-for-congress-to-choose-cor/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/08/nyts-krugman-now-is-really-the-time-for-congress-to-choose-cor/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/08/nyts-krugman-now-is-really-the-time-for-congress-to-choose-cor/#commentsFiled under: , ,

New York Times columnist and Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman knows the situation facing the United States is very serious, so he doesn't mince words.

 columnist and Nobel Prize-winning economist knows the situation facing the United States is very serious, so he doesn't mince words.

Krugman outlined: The housing sector has collapsed. Consumers have sharply decreased their spending, due to a declining stock market, home prices, and stagnant wages. Businesses are cutting investment. Exports, the formerly one strength of the economy, are plunging, as the recession grips emerging markets. The Fed has already cut short-term interest rates to zero. And there are signs of deflation. In sum, the U.S. economy is very close to the dreaded negative spiral that tends to feed on itself, and that could continue for a long, long time without fiscal stimulus.

Hence, the nation needs to pass the fiscal stimulus package, and if anything, the current package is too small, he argued.

Continue reading NYT's Krugman: Now is really the time for Congress to choose correctly

NYT's Krugman: Now is really the time for Congress to choose correctly originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Sun, 08 Feb 2009 10:40:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>CongressDemocratsfisal stimulus packagegdpKeynesObama administrationPaul KrugmanRepublicansU.S. economySun, 08 Feb 2009 10:40:00 EST<![CDATA[NYT's Krugman: Here's a better bank rescue, for the taxpayer]]>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/nyts-krugman-heres-a-better-bank-rescue-for-the-taxpayer/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/nyts-krugman-heres-a-better-bank-rescue-for-the-taxpayer/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/nyts-krugman-heres-a-better-bank-rescue-for-the-taxpayer/#commentsFiled under: ,

You have to appreciate the cleverness of this era's financial humor. (Note that I said, appreciate the cleverness, not love, or enjoy. That's because, depending on your perspective, the humor is either on-the-mark, or not that funny. But that is part of the subjective nature of humor.)

One joke making the rounds:

Question: What's the capital of Iceland?
Answer: $25.

Another: In the old days, banks lent money to people. These days, people lend money to banks.

New York Times (NYSE: NYT) columnist and Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman discusses bank capital and lending in his most recent column, and argues that the apparent likely Obama administration fix for the banking sector -- a combination of U.S. government purchase of toxic assets and guarantees against losses on other assets, each on terms favorable to the banks -- represents a lousy deal for the U.S. taxpayer, who'll end up "footing the bill for rescuing the banks."

Continue reading NYT's Krugman: Here's a better bank rescue, for the taxpayer

NYT's Krugman: Here's a better bank rescue, for the taxpayer originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>bank bailoutbank rescuebanking sectorCongressDemocratsfeaturedfiscal policyKeynesianObama AdministrationPaul KrugmanRepublicanstoxic assetsTue, 03 Feb 2009 19:00:00 EST<![CDATA[U.S. budget deficit remains serviceable, provided U.S. economy grows ]]>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/u-s-budget-deficit-remains-serviceable-provided-u-s-economy-g/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/u-s-budget-deficit-remains-serviceable-provided-u-s-economy-g/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/u-s-budget-deficit-remains-serviceable-provided-u-s-economy-g/#commentsFiled under: , , ,

One of the biggest misnomers in the current fiscal stimulus debate concerns the United States' ability to service its budget deficit and national debt (pdf).

Provided the fiscal stimulus package is passed, the national debt ceiling will increase to $12.1 trillion from the current $11.3 trillion.

Deficit approaching intolerable levels?

Economic conservatives, market absolutists, and the like argue that the annual budget deficit and national debt are approaching intolerable levels. In truth, what they're arguing against is a needed government intervention and New Deal-type spending required to jump-start the U.S. economy -- even if it means the economy will plunge into a deeper recession without the stimulus. It seems some economic conservatives would rather see the nation's economy suffer, than to violate one their flawed economic theories.

Continue reading U.S. budget deficit remains serviceable, provided U.S. economy grows

U.S. budget deficit remains serviceable, provided U.S. economy grows originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:45:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>budget deficitfiscal policyfiscal stimulus packagegdpKeynesiansmonetaristsnational debtPaul KrugmanU.S. economyMon, 26 Jan 2009 17:45:00 EST<![CDATA[NYT's Krugman: Hopefully, 'Globalization 2.0' will fare better than 1.0]]>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/22/nyts-krugman-hopefully-globalization-2-0-will-fare-better-t/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/22/nyts-krugman-hopefully-globalization-2-0-will-fare-better-t/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/22/nyts-krugman-hopefully-globalization-2-0-will-fare-better-t/#commentsFiled under: , , , ,

So globalization -- the spread of free markets integrated internationally by trade -- is guaranteed, correct? Just like the market's ability to self-correct, self-reform, and self-regulate?

Not quite, says New York Times columnist and Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman.

Krugman argues that the current globalization era is actually 'Globalization 2.0.' 'Globalization 1.0' began in 1919, also a period of large-scale international trade and investment, when it was thought that commerce and the benefits of trade would render previous ethnic and cultural rivalries between nations irrelevant.

History did not begin in 1981

What followed, Krugman notes -- and this will be illuminating for those investors who believe history began in 1981 -- was war, revolution, political instability, depression, and more war ... for 30 years.

To be sure, the world today is a different 'political economy place' than it was in 1919, Krugman adds, with the economic / minor-political integration of Europe being a big difference: the euro-zone and E.U. means European states are less likely today to go to war with one another.

Continue reading NYT's Krugman: Hopefully, 'Globalization 2.0' will fare better than 1.0

NYT's Krugman: Hopefully, 'Globalization 2.0' will fare better than 1.0 originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:19:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>ChinaEUEuropean UnionfeaturedglobalizationJapanPaul KrugmanPaulKrugmanRussiatradeU.S. economyMon, 22 Dec 2008 14:19:00 EST<![CDATA[NYT's Krugman: The financial and economic warning signs were there]]>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/04/nyts-krugman-the-financial-and-economic-warning-signs-were-the/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/04/nyts-krugman-the-financial-and-economic-warning-signs-were-the/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/04/nyts-krugman-the-financial-and-economic-warning-signs-were-the/#commentsFiled under: , , , ,

Beige book weakness, nationwide. Holiday retail sales tepid at best (so far). Business investment lackluster. And Friday yet another employment situation report from the good statisticians at the U.S. Department of Labor. Consensus: the U.S. economy probably shed another 300,000 jobs in November.

A decade of descent

One can't say we weren't warned about the recession that we're now in - - not with the increased concentration of wealth and concomitant increase in poverty, lack of job creation, and wage stagnation that accompanied the recent economic expansion, to go along with excessive leverage, system-wide.

New York Times (NYSE: NYT) columnist and Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman provides a little perspective on how we got here and also offers some hope, regarding these trying economic times.

On the signals, or signs, some in economics, corporate, and public policy circles are suggesting that we didn't have any signs of economic trouble ahead. "Why weren't we warned?"

Ah, but you were warned, Krugman said. And these warnings were ignored. Item: Clear signs of a housing bubble, after the dot-com bubble a decade earlier. Item: The implosion, and required dissolving of Long Term Capital Management in 1998 - - just one hedge fund, but one that nevertheless temporarily paralyzed credit markets, globally. Item: The near-universal belief in the market's ability to self-correct, self-police, and if need be, self-punish transgressors, when there was little case precedent to hold that mistaken notion. In sum, there were plenty of warnings, Krugman argues.

Continue reading NYT's Krugman: The financial and economic warning signs were there

NYT's Krugman: The financial and economic warning signs were there originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Thu, 04 Dec 2008 18:15:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>ethicsgdpKrugmanleveragePaul KrugmanregulationsU.S. economyThu, 04 Dec 2008 18:15:00 EST<![CDATA[NYT's Krugman: Think economic momentum, not balanced budgets]]>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/17/nyts-krugman-think-economic-momentum-not-balanced-budgets/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/17/nyts-krugman-think-economic-momentum-not-balanced-budgets/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/17/nyts-krugman-think-economic-momentum-not-balanced-budgets/#commentsFiled under: , , ,

New York Times columnist and Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman underscores that those who are thinking in terms of a balanced federal budget now are doing a serious disservice to the economy, and, by extension, to the nation.

It's important for the U.S. Government to return to a balanced budget when the economy returns to health, but it is critically important for Congress to approve a large fiscal stimulus to help the U.S. economy recover from the current recession, he said.

Sees danger of vicious cycle

That's because doing so will help end what Krugman argues is a vicious cycle of contraction that's beginning to play itself out in the economy. Rising unemployment will lead to further reductions in consumer spending, which will lead to further business cutbacks in production and more job cuts, which will lead to further reductions in consumer spending, contracting the economy even more, and so on. It's a destructive cycle that has to be stopped, and fiscal stimulus is part of the healing: it will get momentum headed in the constructive direction.

For those who doubt the harm that prematurely trying to balance a budget can do to the U.S. economy, Krugman offered FDR's premature attempt to balance the budget in 1937: it almost destroyed the New Deal and the economic recovery taking place in the nation at that time.

Continue reading NYT's Krugman: Think economic momentum, not balanced budgets

NYT's Krugman: Think economic momentum, not balanced budgets originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:40:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>consumer spendingDemocratsFDRfiscal policyfiscal stimulusgdpNew DealObamaPaul KrugmanPelosiRepublicansU.S. CongressU.S. economyMon, 17 Nov 2008 16:40:00 EST<![CDATA[NYT's Krugman to President-elect Obama: Think big ]]>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/nyts-krugman-to-president-elect-obama-think-big/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/nyts-krugman-to-president-elect-obama-think-big/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/nyts-krugman-to-president-elect-obama-think-big/#commentsFiled under: , , ,

New York Times (NYSE: NYT) columnist and Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman argues, in so many words, that, indeed, the United States must go back, to get to the future.

Krugman's advice for President-elect Barack Obama? Think big. Contrary to selected, conservative arguments about President Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal, the reason the New Deal had limited, short-term success was the fact that FDR's economic policies were too cautious, he said.

The New Deal: new life

The New Deal's long-term success and achievements, including the structural changes to the U.S. economy (including Social Security and bank deposit insurance), have proved to be both durable and essential, most economists, including Krugman, agree.

Hence, President-elect Obama should think big from the get-go, Krugman says, and avoid the mistaken belief that 'government spending made the Great Depression worse,' and Obama should move forward with a large fiscal stimulus to put people back to work, for work that needs to be done in these United States.

Continue reading NYT's Krugman to President-elect Obama: Think big

NYT's Krugman to President-elect Obama: Think big originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>1920s1930sBarack ObamaDemocratsFDRfiscal policyFranklin D. RooseveltgdpGreat DepressionHooverKeynesKeynesiansNew DealObamaPaul Krugmanpump primingRepublicansRoaring 20sU.S. economyWorld War IITue, 11 Nov 2008 16:00:00 EST<![CDATA[NYT's Krugman: A fiscal stimulus dollar in time could save nine]]>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/04/nyts-krugman-a-fiscal-stimulus-dollar-in-time-could-save-nine/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/04/nyts-krugman-a-fiscal-stimulus-dollar-in-time-could-save-nine/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/04/nyts-krugman-a-fiscal-stimulus-dollar-in-time-could-save-nine/#commentsFiled under: , , ,

New York Times (NYSE: NYT) columnist and Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman argues that the recent statistics on consumer spending offer disappointing news for those who believe U.S. economic growth will resume via spontaneous generation.

Growth, Krugman argues, will not magically appear and the consumer pull-back provides testimony: real consumer spending fell at an annual rate of 3.1% in Q3, with major declines in durable goods purchases.

Further, as Krugman notes, the last time consumer spending fell as sharply was 1980, when the economy was enduring a severe recession with double-digit inflation.

Foreboding consumer spending

Consumers are in pull-back mode, Krugman states, and that fact, combined with general economic slowness - - U.S. GDP contracted in Q3 by 0.3% - - and the lending constraints stemming from the credit crunch, creates a climate that's not for the squeamish: consumers are belt-tightening for justifiable reasons, individually, but their collective belt-tightening could lead to a disaster - - a deeper recession.

That's because, as economist John Maynard Keynes taught, a savings rate is required for a productive, healthy economy, but if every citizen saved everything he/she could all the time, it would be a disaster.

Continue reading NYT's Krugman: A fiscal stimulus dollar in time could save nine

NYT's Krugman: A fiscal stimulus dollar in time could save nine originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 04 Nov 2008 10:58:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>consumer spendingfiscal policyfiscal stimulusgdpinthenewsmonetary policyPaul Krugmansavings rateU.S. economyTue, 04 Nov 2008 10:58:00 EST<![CDATA[Paul Krugman wins Nobel Prize. Can he safely deposit his $1.4 million check?]]>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/13/paul-krugman-wins-nobel-prize-can-he-safely-deposit-his-1-4-mi/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/13/paul-krugman-wins-nobel-prize-can-he-safely-deposit-his-1-4-mi/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/13/paul-krugman-wins-nobel-prize-can-he-safely-deposit-his-1-4-mi/#commentsFiled under:

Princeton professor and New York Times op-editorialist, Paul Krugman, just won the Nobel Prize in economics "for his analysis of trade patterns and location of economic activity." This award comes at a time when he has been weighing in on the debate as to how best to fix the financial crisis. And I found inspiring his suggestion that governments should inject capital into ailing banks -- an idea that has taken hold in the U.K. and may also prevail here.

Why did Krugman win the Nobel? His work bolstered a branch of economics called strategic trade theory which argues that countries can subsidize certain industries to gain global market share. Others have praised his work on the development of clusters of related industries and his equations that measure how economic shocks affect the current account, exchange rates and capital flows.

The official name of Krugman's prize is "The Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel." He'll get $1.4 million, a gold medal and a diploma. I've agreed and disagreed with him but if his ideas about how to fix the financial crisis take hold, maybe he'll be able to find a safe bank in which to deposit his winnings.

Peter Cohan is President of Peter S. Cohan & Associates. He also teaches management at Babson College and edits The Cohan Letter.

Paul Krugman wins Nobel Prize. Can he safely deposit his $1.4 million check? originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Mon, 13 Oct 2008 09:31:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>inthenewsnobel prizenobel prize winnernobel prize winnersnobel prizesNobelPrizeNobelPrizesNobelPrizeWinnerNobelPrizeWinnerspaul krugmanPaulKrugmanMon, 13 Oct 2008 09:31:00 EST<![CDATA[Is U.S.'s economic slump mirroring Japan's late-1980s slump?]]>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/is-u-s-s-economic-slump-mirroring-japans-late-1980s-slump/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/is-u-s-s-economic-slump-mirroring-japans-late-1980s-slump/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/08/is-u-s-s-economic-slump-mirroring-japans-late-1980s-slump/#commentsFiled under: , , , ,

New York Times columnist Paul Krugman, a person who freely and proudly states his liberal economic outlook, (See Krugman's book: The Conscience of a Liberal) and his disagreement with the Bush Administration's economic conservatism, once again reminds investors/readers that the U.S. financial crisis is resembling that of Japan's in the late 1980s.

Investors/readers will recall that in the late 1980s, fanned by easily obtainable credit, commercial and residential real estate prices skyrocketed in Japan, with investors and speculators continuing to bid-up prices, despite the fact that numerous indicators signaled that prices were astronomically overvalued. Further, Japan's real estate boom occurred during only a modest increase in household formation and amid an aging population. What followed was inevitable: the bubble burst, albeit slowly, and the correction led to a decade-long economic slump for Japan.

Fast-forward to the United States, 2003-2007: intoxicating rises in home prices, fueled by 'extremely creative' mortgage plans, and a belief that out-sized gains would not end soon. Yet all the while, job growth remained modest at best, with falling real wages in many job categories. The U.S. economy was growing, but the growth was not sustainable because it was rooted in a bubble - - a real estate bubble - - not in an increase in the nation's productive capacity and good jobs, so says economist Glen Langan. Or as Langan called it, the U.S. economy in 2003-2007 was, largely, "an asset appreciation economy."

Continue reading Is U.S.'s economic slump mirroring Japan's late-1980s slump?

Is U.S.'s economic slump mirroring Japan's late-1980s slump? originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Mon, 08 Sep 2008 14:24:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>assetsBernankefeaturedFedforeclosuresgdphousing bubbleinterest ratesJapanjobsmedian home pricesmortgagesPaul KrugmanPaulsonU.S. economyU.S. Federal ReserveU.S. Treasuryunemployment rateMon, 08 Sep 2008 14:24:00 EST<![CDATA[NYT's Krugman: Slumping U.S. economy not entirely Bush's fault]]>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/nyt-s-krugman-slumping-u-s-economy-not-entirely-of-bush-s-maki/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/nyt-s-krugman-slumping-u-s-economy-not-entirely-of-bush-s-maki/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/nyt-s-krugman-slumping-u-s-economy-not-entirely-of-bush-s-maki/#commentsFiled under: , ,

New York Times (NYSE: NYT) columnist and economist Paul Krugman, author of The Conscience of a Liberal, would never be confused with a loyal backer of the economic policies of President Bush.

Still, Krugman, in the academic tradition that argues that a scholar's most important word is "valid," gives President Bush credit where credit is due -- or at least a lack of blame. Krugman says it's true that the U.S. economy is a mess, but it's not true that the bad economy is entirely President Bush's fault.

Krugman outlines the unfortunate reality regarding the U.S. economy's 2001-2008 performance: recession, followed by one of the weakest recoveries since World War II, followed by another slump that technically isn't a recession yet. When President Bush leaves office, Krugman says, the U.S. economy will have created five million jobs, not nearly enough to keep up with population growth. By contrast, 22 million jobs were created during the Clinton Administration.

Continue reading NYT's Krugman: Slumping U.S. economy not entirely Bush's fault

NYT's Krugman: Slumping U.S. economy not entirely Bush's fault originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>gasoline pricesgdphealth careinflationinthenewsjob creationjobsoil pricesPaul KrugmanThe Conscience of a LiberalThe New York TimesTheNewYorkTimesU.S. economyunemploymentTue, 08 Jul 2008 15:30:00 EST<![CDATA[NYT's Krugman: Speculators schmeculators - demand is pushing oil higher, not traders]]>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/01/nyts-krugman-speculators-schmeculators-demand-is-pushing-oil/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/01/nyts-krugman-speculators-schmeculators-demand-is-pushing-oil/http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/01/nyts-krugman-speculators-schmeculators-demand-is-pushing-oil/#commentsFiled under: , ,

One of the major economic debates on Main Street and in Washington concerns the influence of speculators during oil's record price rise. (Oil currently trades above $140 and is up 100% during the past year, and more than 400% since 2000).

More than one Congressional committee is investigating the role of speculators, who critics say have 'distorted' or artificially boosted oil's price -- driven it higher than a level the commodity would trade at if the price were based solely on supply and demand fundamentals.

New York Times columnist Paul Krugman, while not denying speculators have contributed to oil's record rise, nevertheless offers perhaps the strongest evidence regarding how a commodity's price can rise a great deal, without the influence of speculators. His evidence: iron ore.

Continue reading NYT's Krugman: Speculators schmeculators - demand is pushing oil higher, not traders

NYT's Krugman: Speculators schmeculators - demand is pushing oil higher, not traders originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 01 Jul 2008 17:34:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments]]>emerging marketsgasoline pricesglobalizationhedge fundsinvestment fundsiron oreiron ore pricesKrugmanoil pricesoil shockOPECPaul KrugmanspeculatorsTue, 01 Jul 2008 17:34:00 EST