Selected House Republicans said they had never agreed to a bailout deal, despite only hours earlier Bush Administration officials announcing an agreement on "fundamentals."

That segment of House Republicans, many from the party's conservative wing, say they oppose assisting Wall Street firms, which they believe made wrong business choices that led to the crisis. As an alternative, House Republicans offered a plan under which companies would buy insurance from the government, and that includes proposed tax cuts and a relaxation of government regulations.

Currency trader Andrew Resnick said the House Republicans' plan was deficient from a number of standpoints.

"Is this the way a responsible coalition behaves? You say nothing all day, then in the dead of night present a questionable plan via back-channels? Frankly, it's reckless and bizarre," Resnick said. "The House Republicans are playing with fire. Here we are trying to prevent a financial crisis from turning into a catastrophe and one political camp wants to play partisan politics. It's the height or depth of public irresponsibility."

Resnick said credit markets, already stressed by a series of financial institution and bank failures, as well as forced margin calls, could degenerate further.

"I'll tell you right now this whole [expletive] system could come crashing down if banks continue to hoard funds and a series of cascading sales starts to occur," Resnick said. "The House Republican plan also isn't credible. Few expect it to provide the liquidity necessary to keep the financial system functioning, and their tax cut proposal is just nuts. They want to increase the federal budget deficit more? With the dollar weak and after eight years of deficits?" Resnick added that he was presently flat, or had no open currency trading positions.

First the good news: Congressional Democrats are talking up the idea of a second fiscal stimulus package to help jump start the U.S. economy.

Now the bad news: Congressional Democrats are talking up the idea of a second fiscal stimulus package to help jump start the U.S. economy.

U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-California, said she would raise the prospect of a second stimulus bill when she and other Congressional leaders meet with President Bush this week, CNN reported Monday.

Anemic U.S. economy

Speaker Pelosi did not provide specifics but said March 2008's "disturbing unemployment numbers" which indicated the nation's economy lost 80,000 jobs "compels the President to work with Congress on a second stimulus package to get our economy back on track, create jobs, and speed assistance to families struggling to make ends meet," CNN said.

On Monday, the Bush Administration said it was too soon to talk about the need for a second economic stimulus package because the first one had not been fully implemented yet, Reuters reported.

The major public policy players in Washington appear to be lining up in support of a fiscal stimulus package to help jump-start the ailing U.S. economy.

Professor Emeritus David E. RePass of the University of Connecticut once said that, "Congress doesn't react, unless not reacting will result in the Congress bearing the wrath of the American voter."

In this instance, it looks like the Congress has heard about, or has at least taken the pulse of economic conditions in their home districts, and is set to act on a stimulus package. And, by all accounts, it looks like they may do it in near-record time. (The late writer Mark Twain would add here, "Famous last words.")

Fiscal stimulus: full speed ahead

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-California, said she expects to introduce an economic stimulus package after she meets with President Bush next Tuesday, CBS News reported. Further, on Friday, President Bush outlined a proposed $140 billion stimulus plan, which will include tax cuts and other tax credits, The Wall Street Journal reported. In his statement Friday, Bush did not provide specifics, but lawmakers close to the White House said the administration is set to propose tax rebates of $800 and $1,600, for individuals and households, respectively, and is set to provide businesses with a 50% tax deduction for new equipment purchases, The Journal reported.

Detroit lost control of its own market last month, as domestic market share fell below 50 percent for the first time in history, and they have no one to blame but themselves. According to USA Today, Paul Ballew, executive director of market and industry analysis at General Motors Corporation (NYSE: GM) said: "We are not going to cede market share to the competition." What Ballew failed to admit was the fact that they already have, and it's been going on for years.

Foreign automakers have seized the opportunity to take market share during the summer by offering tons of rebates, with Toyota Motor Corporation (NYSE: TM) offering a record number of incentives, according to Edmunds.com. Despite the push, overall auto sales last month were down 12.3 percent compared to July 2006. Excluding Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.(NASDAQ: NSANY), BMW and Kia, every major automaker posted a decline in U.S. sales.

Industry experts cited months of higher-than-average gas prices, as well as the problems in the housing market, for soft sales. "Experts" failed to mention that most foreign cars provide tons of incentives, better miles per gallon and have a better reputation than American cars.

With the weakness in the overall industry last month, automakers could start to develop some creative and aggressive marketing ploys, Jesse Toprak, an analyst at Edmunds.com, told USA Today. The real question is will U.S. companies ever realize they need to develop autos that have better mileage, and steer away from building gigantic gas guzzling SUVs? With House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Massachusetts Rep. Ed Markey abandoning their push (subscription required) for an increase in fuel-economy standards, Detroit lacks any reason to even consider it.