<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Photo Sharing vs Social Media: Who Wins?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/06/photo-sharing-vs-social-media-who-wins/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/06/photo-sharing-vs-social-media-who-wins/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/06/photo-sharing-vs-social-media-who-wins/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/06/df-surprise-product-hits-facebook-200.jpg" alt="" />Have you ever looked at your <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) <a target="_blank" href="http://www.flickr.com/">Flickr</a> account and thought, "Why am I doing this? I can just throw my pics up on Facebook"? If this has crossed your mind, you're not alone. In fact, many photo-sharing sites - <a target="_blank" href="http://www.snapfish.com">Snapfish</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hewlett-packard-company/hpq/nys">HPQ</a>), <a target="_blank" href="http://www.photobucket.com">Photobucket</a>, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.picasa.com">Picasa</a> (NASDAQ: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) and Shutterfly, as well as Flickr - are asking the same questions. With the development and enhancement of photo management capabilities in major social networking websites, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSTRE5824TB20090903?pageNumber=2&amp;virtualBrandChannel=10522">niche players need to find new ways to stay relevant</a>. </p>
<p>The situation is still far from grim. Fed by traffic from their behemoth owners, the photo-sharing sites remain substantial forces, and they are currently home to more than 20 billion pictures. There's still plenty of interest in these environments ... which has been bolstered by specific features that make the likes of Flickr attractive to both professional photographers and amateur shooters. The ability to order prints and personalize portfolios, for example, still provides an edge over sites like <a target="_blank" href="http://www.facebook.com">Facebook</a> and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.myspace.com">MySpace</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/newstar-financial-inc/news/nas">NEWS</a>). </p>
<p>Nonetheless, the threats from the social networking space are quite real. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/06/photo-sharing-vs-social-media-who-wins/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Photo Sharing vs Social Media: Who Wins?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/06/photo-sharing-vs-social-media-who-wins/">Photo Sharing vs Social Media: Who Wins?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 06 Sep 2009 19:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSTRE5824TB20090903?pageNumber=2&amp;virtualBrandChannel=10522>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/06/photo-sharing-vs-social-media-who-wins/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19152748/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/06/photo-sharing-vs-social-media-who-wins/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>facebook</category><category>flickr</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>hewlett-packard</category><category>hp</category><category>hpq</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>myspace</category><category>photo</category><category>photobucket</category><category>photography</category><category>photos</category><category>picasa</category><category>snapfish</category><category>social media</category><category>social network</category><category>social networking</category><category>SocialMedia</category><category>SocialNetwork</category><category>SocialNetworking</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 19:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hottest Products of 2007: Nikon Coolpix takes photo convenience online]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/hottest-products-of-2007-nikon-coolpix-takes-photo-convenience/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/hottest-products-of-2007-nikon-coolpix-takes-photo-convenience/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/hottest-products-of-2007-nikon-coolpix-takes-photo-convenience/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nextbigthing/" rel="tag">Next Big Thing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><em>This post is part of our <strong>Hottest Products of 2007</strong> feature. Also check out our other </em><em><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/hot-products-2007">Hottest Products of 2007</a></em><em> posts and let us know which product you think is the greatest thing since sliced bread.</em></p>
<p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="Nikon Coolpix" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/top-products-2007-200-coolpix-cs111207.jpg" />In one pocket, perhaps you have your camera, which takes great, high-resolution shots. Maybe it was even one of 2005's hottest products. </p>
<p>In the other pocket is your cell phone. The photos it takes are low res, but you don't have to upload them to your computer before sharing them with friends.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://nikonusa.com/template.php?cat=1&amp;grp=2&amp;productNr=25575">Nikon Coolpix S51c</a> is one of our hottest products of 2007 because it captures the best of both worlds. As a camera, it offers 8.1 megapixel resolution, which will stand up to coffee-table sized prints, in an elegant case that fits neatly in your shirt pocket.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/hottest-products-of-2007-nikon-coolpix-takes-photo-convenience/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Hottest Products of 2007: Nikon Coolpix takes photo convenience online</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/hottest-products-of-2007-nikon-coolpix-takes-photo-convenience/">Hottest Products of 2007: Nikon Coolpix takes photo convenience online</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/article/0,28804,1677329_1677346_1677351,00.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/hottest-products-of-2007-nikon-coolpix-takes-photo-convenience/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1038218/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/hottest-products-of-2007-nikon-coolpix-takes-photo-convenience/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Coolpix</category><category>digital camera</category><category>digital cameras</category><category>hottest products of 2007</category><category>Nikon</category><category>Nikon Coolpix S51c</category><category>photos</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Barlow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is TechCrunch being Punk'd? A case of Google voodoo and Ashton Kutcher's bare torso]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/11/is-techcrunch-being-punkd-a-case-of-google-voodoo-and-ashton-k/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/11/is-techcrunch-being-punkd-a-case-of-google-voodoo-and-ashton-k/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/11/is-techcrunch-being-punkd-a-case-of-google-voodoo-and-ashton-k/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/ashton-kutcher-demi-moore.jpg" alt="Ashton Kutcher and Demi Moore" />I'm fascinated by the recent attempt of Australia's Virgin Mobile to apply the internet's unruly, free-for-all mindset on the real bricks and mortar world. If you missed it, Virgin used royalty-free images from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>)'s <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/sesh00/515961023/">photo-hosting site Flickr</a> in a print ad campaign, and <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/01/technology/01link.html">subsequently faces some courtroom headaches</a>.<br /><br />Now comes the equally engaging inverse of that case -- a situation that could be woven <strong>only</strong> on the web. Popular technology blog TechCrunch has been threatened with litigation seeking $1.5 million, accused of misappropriating <a href="http://www.oroscopi.com/sfondi/immagini/star/ashton_kutcher_1024x768.jpg" target="_new">this professional photo of </a><a href="http://www.oroscopi.com/sfondi/immagini/star/ashton_kutcher_1024x768.jpg" target="_new">Ashton Kutcher</a>, the actor and host of MTV's <em>Punk'd</em>.<br /><br />What's the evidence? <a target="_new" href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=ashton+kutcher">This Google search</a>, apparently. Go ahead -- click the search. Assuming Google hasn't switched things around on us, the, uh, dreamy beefcake shot in question should show up at the top, promoting <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>)'s image search (by the way, when did the great Googly Moogly start returning "Extra Large Images"? I gotta keep up).<br /><br />If you click on Ashton's shiny, hairless torso, you'll be taken to <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/19/fifty-oomas-for-readers/#comment-1508418">this TechCrunch post</a>, regarding the voice-over-IP gizmo <a href="http://www.ooma.com/index.php">Ooma</a> (bewilderingly, Demi Moore's main man-boy is Ooma's creative director). Clicking on a Google image-search result typically takes you to the web page where you can see the picture in context.<br /><br />Damning evidence? Here's where it gets interesting, at least for those of us whose job duties include ritual prayers to Google -- <em>TechCrunch never actually used the photo</em>. What has the photographer's agency all litigation-happy actually stems from Google's rocket science.<br /><br />Apparently, a sass-talking TechCrunch reader, in responding to the Ooma post, included a link to the offending photo of Kutcher -- just a link, mind you, <em>not</em> the image itself. In indexing the TechCrunch post, Google's search math processed the linked image and associated it with the TechCrunch post (the ones and zeros at work are somewhat related to Google bombing -- if you're unfamiliar, <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3298443.stm">here's a rundown of the most notorious incident</a> thereof).<br /><br />The photographer's agency had best walk away from this one -- it has no case. Or maybe Ashton's really <em>Punk'</em>ng TechCrunch, and this is all a brilliant promotion as part of his duties as Ooma's creative director. After all, had you heard about Ooma before?<br /><br /><strong>UPDATE:</strong> It figures -- <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=ashton+kutcher">the Google search</a> now links Kutcher's photo to this <a href="http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070902113704AA9Lawj">Yahoo! Answers page</a> -- I guess it's their headache now. Learn more at <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/11/being-stupid-and-litigious-is-no-way-to-go-through-life/">TechCrunch's post</a>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/11/is-techcrunch-being-punkd-a-case-of-google-voodoo-and-ashton-k/">Is TechCrunch being Punk'd? A case of Google voodoo and Ashton Kutcher's bare torso</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/11/being-stupid-and-litigious-is-no-way-to-go-through-life/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/11/is-techcrunch-being-punkd-a-case-of-google-voodoo-and-ashton-k/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1011359/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/11/is-techcrunch-being-punkd-a-case-of-google-voodoo-and-ashton-k/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ashton Kutcher</category><category>AshtonKutcher</category><category>blog law</category><category>BlogLaw</category><category>blogs</category><category>copyright</category><category>law</category><category>litigation</category><category>Ooma</category><category>photos</category><category>TechCrunch</category><category>VoIP</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Barry Summerlin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Crox -- beauty is foot deep, but ugly goes right to the bone]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/12/crox-beauty-is-foot-deep-but-ugly-goes-right-to-the-bone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/12/crox-beauty-is-foot-deep-but-ugly-goes-right-to-the-bone/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/12/crox-beauty-is-foot-deep-but-ugly-goes-right-to-the-bone/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/crox/" rel="tag">Crocs Inc (CROX)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/crox712.jpg" />I had a notion once to start a guerrilla marketing company, offering to destroy competing brands by dressing the ugliest, most loathsome people I could find in that competing brand's product. <br /><br />Now, I don't mean to suggest that <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2007/07/12/cain-and-co-rockin-crocs-blech/">Dean Cain (Superboy)</a> or <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/19/president-bush-and-crocs-thumb-their-noses-at-media-polls-approv/">G.W. Bush</a> (Superpresidenter guy) fall into that category, but <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/crocs-incorporated/crox/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Crocs Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/crocs-incorporated/crox/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">CROX</a>) has to be a little concerned when the brand shows up on C-list actors and unpopular politicians.<br /><br />This caused me to jot down a list of Crocs-killers -- people who, by adopting the footwear, could trash the brand. In no particular order -- <br /><br />
<ul>
    <li>Kim Il Jong</li>
    <li>Larry King</li>
    <li>Ziggy</li>
    <li>Mike Tyson</li>
    <li>Osama bin Laden (only in U.S., however)</li>
    <li>Draco Malfoy</li>
    <li>Joan Rivers</li>
    <li>Al Gore</li>
    <li>Tom Barlow (if you knew me, you'd understand.)</li>
</ul>
<br />There's a reason trendy nightclubs have doormen to weed out us dweebs. Perhaps Crocs should consider the same.<br /><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/photos/crocs-love-em-or-hate-em/">Crocs: Love 'em or hate 'em?</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/photos/crocs-love-em-or-hate-em/276198/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/george_bush_getty_pool_crox_450_thumbnail.jpg" alt="George Bush: Loves Crocs (and Crocs chairman Rick Sharp)" title="George Bush: Loves Crocs (and Crocs chairman Rick Sharp)" /></a><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/photos/crocs-love-em-or-hate-em/275976/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/mario_batali_crocs_scottgries_450_thumbnail.jpg" alt="Mario Batali: Loves 'em" title="Mario Batali: Loves 'em" /></a><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/photos/crocs-love-em-or-hate-em/269117/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/nike_store_450_thumbnail.jpg" alt="Georges Yared loves Crocs: The next Nike?" title="Georges Yared loves Crocs: The next Nike?" /></a><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/photos/crocs-love-em-or-hate-em/276084/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/crocs_stand_450_thumbnail.jpg" alt="Escalators: Don't love Crocs" title="Escalators: Don't love Crocs" /></a><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/photos/crocs-love-em-or-hate-em/276261/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/andrew_in_crocs_450_thumbnail.jpg" alt="Elementary school principals: Hate Crocs" title="Elementary school principals: Hate Crocs" /></a></div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/12/crox-beauty-is-foot-deep-but-ugly-goes-right-to-the-bone/">Crox -- beauty is foot deep, but ugly goes right to the bone</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Jul 2007 17:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/12/crox-beauty-is-foot-deep-but-ugly-goes-right-to-the-bone/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/939222/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/12/crox-beauty-is-foot-deep-but-ugly-goes-right-to-the-bone/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Al Gore</category><category>AlGore</category><category>crocs</category><category>crox</category><category>dean cain</category><category>DeanCain</category><category>Draco Malfoy</category><category>DracoMalfoy</category><category>feet</category><category>images</category><category>Joan Rivers</category><category>JoanRivers</category><category>Kim II Jung</category><category>KimIiJung</category><category>Larry King</category><category>LarryKing</category><category>Mike Tyson</category><category>MikeTyson</category><category>Osama bin Laden</category><category>OsamaBinLaden</category><category>photos</category><category>shoes</category><category>ugly people</category><category>UglyPeople</category><category>Ziggy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Barlow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 17:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Shutterfly Takes Flight]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/29/shutterfly-takes-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/29/shutterfly-takes-flight/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/29/shutterfly-takes-flight/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a></p><p><a href="http://www.taulli.com" title="Photo Sharing"><img width="185" height="240" align="right" src="http://static.flickr.com/117/255858134_211785aac9_m.jpg" alt="shutterfly" /></a></p>
<p>The year has been tough for tech IPOs, that is, until recently. Some of the blow-out offerings include <a href="http://www.divx.com">DivX</a> and <a href="http://www.riverbed.com/">Riverbed</a>.</p>
<p>Today there was another tech deal: <a href="http://www.shutterfly.com">Shutterfly</a>. True, the stock increased only 3.7%. But, then again, the stock was priced at the top of its $13-$15 range.</p>
<p>Shutterfly was founded in April 1999 and even has a dot-com legend as its Chairman, Jim Clark. He founded <a href="http://www.netscape.com">Netscape</a>, <a href="http://www.webmd.com">Healtheon/Web MD Corp</a>, and Silicon Graphics.</p>
<p>As for Shutterfly, it is a Web-based consumer property that allows users to share, print and preserve their pictures. It is also possible to turn these pictures into physical photos and even books. </p>
<p>But unlike many dot-coms, this one has morphed into a real business. Over the past year, sales have been roughly $108 million. In fact, revenues are growing at 30%+.</p>
<p>There are certainly risks. After all, the company has lost money this year. Also, the current valuation is hefty - at 3X revenues.</p>
<p>Yet, with the Christmas season coming, there is probably some momentum left in this stock. But definitely do not expect a smooth ride.<br /><br /><em>Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including the Complete M&amp;A Handbook and operates InvestorOffering.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/29/shutterfly-takes-flight/">Shutterfly Takes Flight</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/29/shutterfly-takes-flight/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/677209/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/29/shutterfly-takes-flight/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>IPO</category><category>Jim Clark</category><category>JimClark</category><category>Netscape</category><category>Photos</category><category>Shutterfly</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Flickr not even as popular as Yahoo! Photos?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/22/flickr-not-even-as-popular-as-yahoo-photos/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/22/flickr-not-even-as-popular-as-yahoo-photos/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/22/flickr-not-even-as-popular-as-yahoo-photos/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ek/" rel="tag">Eastman Kodak (EK)</a></p><p>I think it is generally recognized that the Web 2.0 world loves <a href="http://www.flickr.com">flickr</a>, with its viral, community-focused fun and its AJAXerrific cool. But a <a href="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/leeann-prescott/2006/06/photobucket_leads_photo_sharin.html">recent report from Hitwise shows that flickr is a distant sixth</a> in terms of market share, at just less than 6%, beaten handily by 44% dominator <a href="http://photobucket.com/">PhotoBucket</a> (the company's competitive strategy: be a storage backend for users who wish to post photos to MySpace), and even by the far less sexy service of flickr's  parent, Yahoo! Photos, at 18% (in second place). Webshots Community, Kodakgallery.com (formerly Ofoto.com), and ImageShack all rank ahead of flickr in terms of market share.</p>
<p>There's a story here, that flickr may seem cool but it's not even a big deal in the traffic big dogs. I don't know if I buy it. LeAnn Prescott, who blogs the market share charts, notes the MySpace strategy of PhotoBucket and mentions that three photo sharing sites in the top 10 are getting the vast majority of their traffic from the teen-centric social network, including Imageshack and Slide.</p>
<p>It's all about the growth of the platform, and the longevity of the business strategy. As a hard-core photo enthusiast who lives and breathes Web 2.0, I've used most of the non-MySpace services. I did Webshots Community, then I switched to Ofoto, and when Kodak bought it I was using Yahoo! Pictures and my own web site. And then I discovered flickr. Now I have 1,859 photos uploaded there. I think that I -- an early adopter who has already convinced any number of friends, family, and colleagues to switch to flickr -- am a fair indicator that the prospects for flickr are good. I have to wonder if PhotoBucket and others who rely so much on one source of traffic.</p>
<p>There it is: the real question. Is that one source a long-term play? Will MySpace still be rocking and rolling in three, five, 10 years? I doubt it. I'd put my money on the technology and monetization potential of flickr anyday.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/22/flickr-not-even-as-popular-as-yahoo-photos/">Flickr not even as popular as Yahoo! Photos?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 22 Jun 2006 15:47:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://weblogs.hitwise.com/leeann-prescott/2006/06/photobucket_leads_photo_sharin.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/22/flickr-not-even-as-popular-as-yahoo-photos/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/636001/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/22/flickr-not-even-as-popular-as-yahoo-photos/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>flickr</category><category>myspace</category><category>photo sharing</category><category>photo sharing sites</category><category>photo-sharing</category><category>photos</category><category>PhotoSharing</category><category>PhotoSharingSites</category><category>picture</category><category>picture sharing</category><category>PictureSharing</category><category>yahoo!</category><category>yahoo! photos</category><category>Yahoo!Photos</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 15:47:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
