<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Has Staples hit a bottom?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/11/has-staples-hit-a-bottom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/11/has-staples-hit-a-bottom/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/11/has-staples-hit-a-bottom/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/spls/" rel="tag">Staples Inc (SPLS)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/staples2.jpg" alt="" />Shares of office products retailer, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/staples-inc/spls/nas">Staples Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/staples-inc/spls/nas">SPLS</a>), recovered today after opening much lower following the company's announcement of a 14% fall in quarterly profit, which missed analysts estimates by 6 cents per share. </p>
<p>For the quarter ending Jan. 31, 2009, Staples said it earned 36 cents per share, excluding one-time items, on revenue of $6.17 billion. This compared to analyst estimates of earnings of 42 cents per share, before one-time items, on revenue of $6.79 billion.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/11/has-staples-hit-a-bottom/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Has Staples hit a bottom?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/11/has-staples-hit-a-bottom/">Has Staples hit a bottom?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/11/has-staples-hit-a-bottom/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1485509/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/11/has-staples-hit-a-bottom/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dlugosch</category><category>louis navelliers portfoliograder pro</category><category>LouisNavelliersPortfoliograderPro</category><category>portfolio grader</category><category>PortfolioGrader</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Dlugosch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Recession stock: Big Lots]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/recession-stock-big-lots/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/recession-stock-big-lots/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/recession-stock-big-lots/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/big-lots-big-logo.gif" />Discount retailer <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/big-lots-inc/big/nys">Big Lots Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/big-lots-inc/big/nys">BIG</a>) saw its shares surge higher in Wednesday trading after it posted a fourth-quarter profit from continuing operations that came in ahead of analysts expectations and offered a better-than-expected outlook.</p>
<p>Clearly, investors view BIG as a <a href="http://www.investorplace.com/experts/richard_young/gallery/winning-stocks.html">recession stock</a> to own.<br /><br />Earnings from continuing operations totaled a dollar per share, ahead of the 93 cents per share analysts were expecting, and 3 cents higher than the year-ago quarter. Revenue fell to $1.37 billion from $1.41 billion last year, but beat expectations of $1.36 billion. Same-store sales fell a mild 3.2%, as sales of discretionary items, such as furniture and toys, were challenging.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/recession-stock-big-lots/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Recession stock: Big Lots</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/recession-stock-big-lots/">Recession stock: Big Lots</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 05 Mar 2009 15:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/recession-stock-big-lots/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1479990/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/recession-stock-big-lots/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>big</category><category>big lots</category><category>BigLots</category><category>dlugosch</category><category>louis navellier</category><category>louis navelliers portfoliograder pro</category><category>LouisNavellier</category><category>LouisNavelliersPortfoliograderPro</category><category>portfolio grader</category><category>portfolio grader pro</category><category>PortfolioGrader</category><category>PortfolioGraderPro</category><category>recession stock</category><category>recession stocks</category><category>RecessionStock</category><category>RecessionStocks</category><category>retail</category><category>retail stocks</category><category>retailers</category><category>RetailStocks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Dlugosch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 15:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GE's 10-cent dividend a big mistake]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/03/ges-10-cent-dividend-a-big-mistake/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/03/ges-10-cent-dividend-a-big-mistake/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/03/ges-10-cent-dividend-a-big-mistake/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hon/" rel="tag">Honeywell Intl (HON)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/ge-general-electric-logo.jpg" alt="" />I've been doing a fair amount of chest puffing lately, as many of my moves suggested here and <a href="http://www.investorplace.com/experts/james_dlugosch/articles/gallery/five-stocks-to-buy-and-hold.html">elsewhere</a> have paid huge dividends for investors. Today, I want to highlight one of my mistakes: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>).</p>
<p>Someone is going to own one heck of an asset when this all shakes out. Unfortunately for GE shareholders, there is a very real risk that you will be on the outside looking in when all is said and done.</p>
<p>Each day the odds are growing that bondholders or the government will end up owning the equity in GE. Given the long-term future of the company, those two parties will be quite pleased.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/03/ges-10-cent-dividend-a-big-mistake/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GE's 10-cent dividend a big mistake</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/03/ges-10-cent-dividend-a-big-mistake/">GE's 10-cent dividend a big mistake</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 03 Mar 2009 08:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/03/ges-10-cent-dividend-a-big-mistake/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1476317/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/03/ges-10-cent-dividend-a-big-mistake/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dividend</category><category>dividend cut</category><category>DividendCut</category><category>featured</category><category>ge</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>louis navelliers portfoliograder pro</category><category>LouisNavelliersPortfoliograderPro</category><category>portfolio grader</category><category>portfolio grader pro</category><category>PortfolioGrader</category><category>PortfolioGraderPro</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Dlugosch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 08:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dell no longer best of breed]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/27/dell-no-longer-best-of-breed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/27/dell-no-longer-best-of-breed/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/27/dell-no-longer-best-of-breed/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/dell.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />There was a time when <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">Dell Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">DELL</a>) was the cream of the crop in the PC business. Its college dorm beginnings and customization model allowed the company to separate itself from a host of other competitors.</p>
<p>It is hard to say what exact magic it was that allowed the DELL story to unfold, but suffice it to say the company was the best in the business at selling computers to individuals and small businesses. But I'm not so sure that is the case any longer. The heady days of the dot-com boom were when this company reached its prime. It has been a slow death ever since.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/27/dell-no-longer-best-of-breed/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Dell no longer best of breed</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/27/dell-no-longer-best-of-breed/">Dell no longer best of breed</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/27/dell-no-longer-best-of-breed/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1474144/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/27/dell-no-longer-best-of-breed/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dlugosch</category><category>louis navellier</category><category>louis navelliers portfoliograder pro</category><category>LouisNavellier</category><category>LouisNavelliersPortfoliograderPro</category><category>PCs</category><category>portfolio grader</category><category>portfolio grader pro</category><category>PortfolioGrader</category><category>PortfolioGraderPro</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Dlugosch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Single-serving coffee not the answer for Starbucks]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/single-serving-coffee-not-the-answer-for-starbucks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/single-serving-coffee-not-the-answer-for-starbucks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/single-serving-coffee-not-the-answer-for-starbucks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/starbucks_latte.jpg" />Is it realistic to expect <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starbucks-corporation/sbux/nas">Starbucks</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starbucks-corporation/sbux/nas">SBUX</a>) to deliver double-digit earnings growth in this environment?
<p>Seriously, can retail customers afford premium coffee when budgets are severely strained and debts are high?</p>
<p>No way. Premium coffee is a luxury item, and though many are addicted to java, cutting back is relatively easy to do. In that dynamic, sales are likely to slow.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/single-serving-coffee-not-the-answer-for-starbucks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Single-serving coffee not the answer for Starbucks</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/single-serving-coffee-not-the-answer-for-starbucks/">Single-serving coffee not the answer for Starbucks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/single-serving-coffee-not-the-answer-for-starbucks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1471381/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/single-serving-coffee-not-the-answer-for-starbucks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>coffee</category><category>dlugosch</category><category>gmcr</category><category>green mountain coffee roasters</category><category>GreenMountainCoffeeRoasters</category><category>inthenews</category><category>louis navellier</category><category>louis navelliers portfoliograder pro</category><category>LouisNavellier</category><category>LouisNavelliersPortfoliograderPro</category><category>portfolio grader</category><category>portfolio grader pro</category><category>PortfolioGrader</category><category>PortfolioGraderPro</category><category>sbux</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamie Dlugosch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:01:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
