<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Geithner Believes Unemployment Could Go Up Before It Goes Down]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/03/geithner-unemployment-could-go-up-before-it-goes-down/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/03/geithner-unemployment-could-go-up-before-it-goes-down/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/03/geithner-unemployment-could-go-up-before-it-goes-down/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/california_unemployed.jpg" />Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner really stepped out on a limb this morning on <em>Good Morning America</em>. He told George Stephanopoulos that the unemployment rate <a target="_blank" href="http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/treasury-secretary-timothy-geithner-unemployment/story?id=11308157">may go up</a> temporarily (defined as a "couple of months") before it comes down. <br />
<br />
I am glad to see that he is applying the old "what goes up must come down" rule we learned in elementary school to our current economic situation. Geithner said that when people are entering the work force "see a little hope that there may be jobs out there, they  start to come back in again. And that can cause the measured  unemployment rate to go up -- temporarily." Geithner admitted that we are still in a "tough economy," but stated expectations for "an economy that's gradually healing, gradually strengthening, businesses starting to add people back." <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/03/geithner-unemployment-could-go-up-before-it-goes-down/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Geithner Believes Unemployment Could Go Up Before It Goes Down</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/03/geithner-unemployment-could-go-up-before-it-goes-down/">Geithner Believes Unemployment Could Go Up Before It Goes Down</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 03 Aug 2010 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/03/geithner-unemployment-could-go-up-before-it-goes-down/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19578910/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/03/geithner-unemployment-could-go-up-before-it-goes-down/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Geithner</category><category>George Stephanopoulos</category><category>Good Morning America</category><category>inthenews</category><category>President Obama</category><category>timothy geithner</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bernanke to Tighten What Obama Wants Loose]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/11/bernanke-to-tighten-what-obama-wants-loose/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/11/bernanke-to-tighten-what-obama-wants-loose/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/11/bernanke-to-tighten-what-obama-wants-loose/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/01/bernanke-obama.jpg" />Have you heard the news? Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke is so deliriously happy about the way economic recovery is progressing that he's already making plans to chill the entire party. That's right, the Fed Chairman is already getting all shaky and whiny about inflation. Who could blame him? It's what he does best.</p>
<p>Now here's the rub: Ben Bernanke is plotting his quicksand parade stopper at the very same time that President Obama is calling for sweeping efforts to break loose credit markets for small business expansion and for employers to hire more workers.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/11/bernanke-to-tighten-what-obama-wants-loose/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bernanke to Tighten What Obama Wants Loose</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/11/bernanke-to-tighten-what-obama-wants-loose/">Bernanke to Tighten What Obama Wants Loose</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/11/bernanke-to-tighten-what-obama-wants-loose/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19353349/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/11/bernanke-to-tighten-what-obama-wants-loose/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ben bernanke</category><category>exit strategy</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>inflation</category><category>President Obama</category><category>TARP</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oil Futures Up on Obama's State of the Union Address]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/28/oil-futures-up-on-obamas-state-of-the-union-address/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/28/oil-futures-up-on-obamas-state-of-the-union-address/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/28/oil-futures-up-on-obamas-state-of-the-union-address/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/risingoil.jpg" alt="" />Last night was President Obama's first State of the Union address. Already, the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/oil-futures-crude-up-obama-optimism-outweighs-demand-doubt-2010-01-28?dist=beforebell">oil market</a> is benefiting from the speech, as it gave a sense of optimism for the economy, according to some analysts. That is, if you can call a 23-cent jump in futures a benefit. <br />
<br />
The speech stressed job creation and the belief that the worst of the economic crisis is over, which has trickled over to investors (and who said trickle-down economics don't work?). Combine last night's Presidential address with the Federal Reserve's decision to leave <a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/mildly-optimistic-fed-stands-pat-on-interest-rates/19334464/">monetary policy unchanged</a> and you have the makings of a temporary bump for the market.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/28/oil-futures-up-on-obamas-state-of-the-union-address/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oil Futures Up on Obama's State of the Union Address</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/28/oil-futures-up-on-obamas-state-of-the-union-address/">Oil Futures Up on Obama's State of the Union Address</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/28/oil-futures-up-on-obamas-state-of-the-union-address/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19335576/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/28/oil-futures-up-on-obamas-state-of-the-union-address/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic recovery</category><category>EconomicRecovery</category><category>inthenews</category><category>oil</category><category>oil futures</category><category>oil prices</category><category>OilFutures</category><category>OilPrices</category><category>President Obama</category><category>PresidentObama</category><category>State of the Union</category><category>StateOfTheUnion</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Delta: Plenty of room for airline industry consolidation]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/16/delta-plenty-of-room-for-airline-industry-consolidation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/16/delta-plenty-of-room-for-airline-industry-consolidation/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/16/delta-plenty-of-room-for-airline-industry-consolidation/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lcc/" rel="tag">US Airways Group (LCC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amr/" rel="tag">AMR Corp (AMR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cal/" rel="tag">Contl Airlines'B' (CAL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/uaua/" rel="tag">UAL Corp (UAUA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jblu/" rel="tag">JetBlue Airways (JBLU)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dal/" rel="tag">Delta Air Lines (DAL)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/05/deltalobby.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />The fact that there hasn't been any action in a while doesn't mean there isn't room for more. Richard Anderson, CEO of Delta Airlines (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/delta-air-lines-inc-del/dal/nys" target="_blank">DAL</a>), says that <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2009-12-15-delta-more-mergers_N.htm" target="_blank">the airline industry could consolidate further</a> -- not exactly a shock in an industry that is known for universal financial suffering. He notes, "If a transaction were to occur, economics should prevail." </p>
<p>The only concern, of course, is whether the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Obamaadministration/">Obama administration</a> would sign off on any future deals. Anderson believes, "I think the case can be made ultimately, but it remains to be seen what this administration's take will be."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/16/delta-plenty-of-room-for-airline-industry-consolidation/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Delta: Plenty of room for airline industry consolidation</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/16/delta-plenty-of-room-for-airline-industry-consolidation/">Delta: Plenty of room for airline industry consolidation</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2009-12-15-delta-more-mergers_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/16/delta-plenty-of-room-for-airline-industry-consolidation/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19283240/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/16/delta-plenty-of-room-for-airline-industry-consolidation/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>acquisitions</category><category>AMR</category><category>CAL</category><category>DAL</category><category>inthenews</category><category>JBLU</category><category>LCC</category><category>mergers</category><category>mergers and acquisitions</category><category>Northwest</category><category>northwest airlines</category><category>ObamaAdministration</category><category>president obama</category><category>Richard Anderson</category><category>UAUA</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[President Obama cautions against double-dip recession]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/president-obama-cautions-against-double-dip-recession/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/president-obama-cautions-against-double-dip-recession/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/president-obama-cautions-against-double-dip-recession/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/03/obama_speaking.jpg" />Although some members of his administration don't hold Fox News in too high of regard, President Barack Obama did sit down with the news outlet to <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUSN188108620091118">discuss the economy</a>. In the interview, President Obama offered what some are calling his "sternest warning" about containing deficits. President Obama believes that a further compilation of government debt could lead to a double-dip recession. </p>
<p>The president believes that his administration faces a "delicate balance of trying to boost the economy and spur job creation," but the administration has to set the economy on "a path toward long-term deficit reduction." He noted that it is important "to recognize ... that at some point, people could lose confidence in the U.S. economy in a way that could actually lead to a double-dip recession."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/president-obama-cautions-against-double-dip-recession/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>President Obama cautions against double-dip recession</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/president-obama-cautions-against-double-dip-recession/">President Obama cautions against double-dip recession</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/president-obama-cautions-against-double-dip-recession/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19244302/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/president-obama-cautions-against-double-dip-recession/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barack obama</category><category>double-dip recession</category><category>employees</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>President Obama</category><category>recession</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Race to declare victory for stimulus]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/race-to-declare-victory-for-stimulus/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/race-to-declare-victory-for-stimulus/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/race-to-declare-victory-for-stimulus/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/wantadspic.jpg" />When you spend $787 billion, there's a lot of pressure to show results. So, there's no surprise that <a target="_blank" href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2009-10-27-jobs_N.htm">success is being proclaimed across the country</a>. States are saying that they've used the federal <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/stimuluspackage/">stimulus package</a> money to create or save more than 388,000 jobs this year. Teachers, construction workers and other professions have realized the upside of stimulus cash according to reports from 33 states and Puerto Rico, with the remainder of the results being released on Friday. </p>
<p>Of course, the numbers "should be taken with a grain of salt," says Ethan Pollack of the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/EconomicPolicyInstitute/">Economic Policy Institute</a>. The states were tasked to count the jobs created or protected, but the results have been of dubious accuracy. This doesn't mean the stats can't provide fodder to people on both sides of the aisle. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Columbia/">Columbia</a> Business School's Frank Lichtenberg says the data shows a solid economic impact, and the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Obamaadministration/">Obama administration</a>'s <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/CouncilofEconomicAdvisors/">Council of Economic Advisors</a> believes the stimulus spending has taken care of between 600,000 and 1.1 million jobs. </p>
<p>And, there are those who disagree. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/race-to-declare-victory-for-stimulus/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Race to declare victory for stimulus</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/race-to-declare-victory-for-stimulus/">Race to declare victory for stimulus</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2009-10-27-jobs_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/race-to-declare-victory-for-stimulus/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19213029/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/28/race-to-declare-victory-for-stimulus/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barack obama</category><category>BarackObama</category><category>bush</category><category>bush administration</category><category>BushAdministration</category><category>columbia</category><category>columbia university</category><category>ColumbiaUniversity</category><category>council of economic advisers</category><category>CouncilOfEconomicAdvisers</category><category>economic policy</category><category>economic policy institute</category><category>EconomicPolicy</category><category>EconomicPolicyInstitute</category><category>george w bush</category><category>GeorgeWBush</category><category>obama</category><category>obama administration</category><category>ObamaAdministration</category><category>president obama</category><category>PresidentObama</category><category>school</category><category>schools</category><category>stimulus</category><category>stimuluspackage</category><category>stimulusplan</category><category>teacher</category><category>teachers</category><category>teaching</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Government poised to take charge of student loan business]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/government-poised-to-take-charge-of-student-loan-business/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/government-poised-to-take-charge-of-student-loan-business/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/government-poised-to-take-charge-of-student-loan-business/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/06/degree200x150.jpg" />A new bill that would revamp student loan programs in the United States <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/perfi/college/2009-09-17-ed-bill_N.htm" target="_blank">passed the House of Representatives</a>. The proposed program, which would affect the largest change on college aid since they came into existence in the 1960s would push private lenders out of the business and put the U.S. government in control.</p>
<p>The new measure would end subsidies for private lenders, increase Pell Grants available for students in financial need, and create grants for community colleges. The proposal includes almost all of President Obama's key points on higher education from the campaign trail. It passed the House 253 - 171, with most representatives sticking to party lines.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/government-poised-to-take-charge-of-student-loan-business/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Government poised to take charge of student loan business</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/government-poised-to-take-charge-of-student-loan-business/">Government poised to take charge of student loan business</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/government-poised-to-take-charge-of-student-loan-business/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19167056/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/19/government-poised-to-take-charge-of-student-loan-business/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barack obama</category><category>congress</category><category>congressional budget office</category><category>education</category><category>house of representatives</category><category>pell grants</category><category>president obama</category><category>student loans</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[President Obama says that financial crisis is not over]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/08/president-obama-says-that-financial-crisis-is-not-over/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/08/president-obama-says-that-financial-crisis-is-not-over/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/08/president-obama-says-that-financial-crisis-is-not-over/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/obamapict..jpg" alt="" />President Obama was in Cincinnati yesterday, where he spoke to a group of union members at a picnic. While he was on his way here, the White House released a statement noting that "working Americans will help our nation emerge from this crisis." Nevertheless, the President believes that the country still faces a <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/obama-says-economic-crisis-isnt-over/657940">"vast and complex" economic crisis</a>. Here is the problem, with a dwindling American workforce, President Obama says that it will be the working Americans that pull the nation out of the economic crisis. Last time we checked (and that was last week), the jobless rate was 9.7%.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/08/president-obama-says-that-financial-crisis-is-not-over/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>President Obama says that financial crisis is not over</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/08/president-obama-says-that-financial-crisis-is-not-over/">President Obama says that financial crisis is not over</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/08/president-obama-says-that-financial-crisis-is-not-over/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19153906/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/08/president-obama-says-that-financial-crisis-is-not-over/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>education</category><category>featured</category><category>job creation</category><category>JobCreation</category><category>jobless</category><category>jobs</category><category>new jobs</category><category>NewJobs</category><category>President Obama</category><category>PresidentObama</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><category>UnemploymentRate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Are the August unemployment numbers reliable?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/04/are-the-august-unemployment-numbers-reliable/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/04/are-the-august-unemployment-numbers-reliable/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/04/are-the-august-unemployment-numbers-reliable/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img width="220" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="166" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/wantadspic.jpg" alt="" />According to the Labor Department, the unemployment rate <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/jobs/jobless-rate-jumps-to-97-percent/654607">increased to 9.7% during August</a> -- hitting the highest level since June 1983. </p>
<p>The report showed that employers cut a net total of 216,000 jobs. The number of jobs cut was less than July's 276,000 (which was upwardly revised) and was the lowest reading in a year. Economists expected job cuts to come in at 225,000. As for the unemployment rate, expectations called for 9.5%.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/04/are-the-august-unemployment-numbers-reliable/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Are the August unemployment numbers reliable?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/04/are-the-august-unemployment-numbers-reliable/">Are the August unemployment numbers reliable?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 04 Sep 2009 13:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/04/are-the-august-unemployment-numbers-reliable/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19151206/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/04/are-the-august-unemployment-numbers-reliable/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic crisis</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jobless claims</category><category>President Obama</category><category>unemployment rate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 13:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bernanke expresses anger over bailouts at town-hall meeting]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/27/bernanke-expresses-anger-over-bailouts-at-town-hall-meeting/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/27/bernanke-expresses-anger-over-bailouts-at-town-hall-meeting/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/27/bernanke-expresses-anger-over-bailouts-at-town-hall-meeting/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/ben-bernanke.jpg" width="220" height="150" alt="" />Upset about last year's major bailouts? Well, you aren't the only one. At a town-hall meeting in Kansas City, Mo., Fed Chair Ben Bernanke said that he had to <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/bernanke-was-angry-about-bailouts/587743">"hold my nose" over the bailouts</a>, which were funded by the taxpayer.</p>
<p>Of course, that was about all the outrage that Big Ben had reserved for the situation, as he noted that the action had to be taken in order for the financial system and economy to not fall apart. Bernanke made the comment in response to a small-business owner who complained that small businesses were shortchanged.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/27/bernanke-expresses-anger-over-bailouts-at-town-hall-meeting/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bernanke expresses anger over bailouts at town-hall meeting</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/27/bernanke-expresses-anger-over-bailouts-at-town-hall-meeting/">Bernanke expresses anger over bailouts at town-hall meeting</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/27/bernanke-expresses-anger-over-bailouts-at-town-hall-meeting/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19110571/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/27/bernanke-expresses-anger-over-bailouts-at-town-hall-meeting/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ben bernanke</category><category>economic crisis</category><category>economic stimulus</category><category>inthenews</category><category>President Obama</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wall Street pay is higher than pre-crisis levels]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/wall-street-pay-is-higher-than-pre-crisis-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/wall-street-pay-is-higher-than-pre-crisis-levels/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/wall-street-pay-is-higher-than-pre-crisis-levels/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/dollarsign-at150-02blog.jpg" />Who is ready for their morning dose of anger? That is what I thought this morning when I found out about the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/22/AR2009072203687.html?hpid=topnews">higher pay at some investment banks</a> following the recent bailouts. Well, let me qualify that -- it isn't necessarily higher pay, but some execs will receive the same amount as they did before the bailouts. Some Wall Street firms, enjoying improving profits are on track to "pay employees as much as, or even more than, it did in the pre-crisis days." The top six U.S. banks have set aside $74 billion to pay employees, up from $60 billion last year, according to the <em>Washington Post</em>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/wall-street-pay-is-higher-than-pre-crisis-levels/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Wall Street pay is higher than pre-crisis levels</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/wall-street-pay-is-higher-than-pre-crisis-levels/">Wall Street pay is higher than pre-crisis levels</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/wall-street-pay-is-higher-than-pre-crisis-levels/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19107293/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/wall-street-pay-is-higher-than-pre-crisis-levels/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banks</category><category>economic crisis</category><category>EconomicCrisis</category><category>executive pay</category><category>ExecutivePay</category><category>inthenews</category><category>President Obama</category><category>PresidentObama</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Warren Buffett calls for a second stimulus package]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/09/warren-buffett-calls-for-a-second-stimulus-package/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/09/warren-buffett-calls-for-a-second-stimulus-package/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/09/warren-buffett-calls-for-a-second-stimulus-package/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/warren-buffett.jpg" width="220" height="179" alt="" />There has been a lot of chatter lately about the <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Business/story?id=8039651&amp;page=1">possibility of a second stimulus package for America</a>, and now it has received the blessing of Warren Buffett.</p>
<p>On this morning's <em>Good Morning America</em> (on ABC), Buffett said, "I think that a second one [stimulus package] may well be called for ... you hope it doesn't get watered down in many ways." Buffett leveled criticism at the first stimulus bill, calling it "sort of like taking half a tablet of Viagra and having a bunch of candy mixed in."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/09/warren-buffett-calls-for-a-second-stimulus-package/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Warren Buffett calls for a second stimulus package</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/09/warren-buffett-calls-for-a-second-stimulus-package/">Warren Buffett calls for a second stimulus package</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 09 Jul 2009 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/09/warren-buffett-calls-for-a-second-stimulus-package/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19091810/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/09/warren-buffett-calls-for-a-second-stimulus-package/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>budget deficit</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>featured</category><category>green shots</category><category>inthenews</category><category>john boehner</category><category>president obama</category><category>recession</category><category>stimulus</category><category>stimulus package</category><category>uneployment</category><category>warren buffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Are emission standards the final nail in Detroit's coffin?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/19/are-emission-standards-the-final-nail-in-detroits-coffin/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/19/are-emission-standards-the-final-nail-in-detroits-coffin/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/19/are-emission-standards-the-final-nail-in-detroits-coffin/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/exhaust-pipe.jpg" />President Obama is set to announce the first-ever <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/automakers-obama-announce-mileage/489039">national emissions limits for vehicles later today</a>, and will require a 35.5 mile-per-gallon fuel efficiency standard. The announcement was confirmed by Vice President Joe Biden as he was giving tours of the super-secret 9/11 bunker ... just kidding. It was confirmed by Carol Browner, the White House energy and climate director. <br /><br />This plan couples pollution reduction from vehicle tailpipes and increased efficiency on the road. The plan should save 1.8 billion barrels of oil through 2016 and will be the environmental equivalent to eliminating 177 million cars from the road. According to the plan, new vehicles will be 30% cleaner and more fuel-efficient by the time the program is in full effect in 2016. New vehicles may then cost an extra $1,300. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/19/are-emission-standards-the-final-nail-in-detroits-coffin/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Are emission standards the final nail in Detroit's coffin?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/19/are-emission-standards-the-final-nail-in-detroits-coffin/">Are emission standards the final nail in Detroit's coffin?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 19 May 2009 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/19/are-emission-standards-the-final-nail-in-detroits-coffin/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1550253/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/19/are-emission-standards-the-final-nail-in-detroits-coffin/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto emissions</category><category>auto technology</category><category>AutoEmissions</category><category>automakers</category><category>AutoTechnology</category><category>chrysler</category><category>emissions reductions</category><category>emissions standards</category><category>EmissionsReductions</category><category>EmissionsStandards</category><category>featured</category><category>general motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>gm</category><category>President Obama</category><category>PresidentObama</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The G-20 Meeting and the Financial Crisis: Victory declared but massive economic problems Remain!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/08/the-g-20-meeting-and-the-financial-crisis-victory-declared-but/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/08/the-g-20-meeting-and-the-financial-crisis-victory-declared-but/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/08/the-g-20-meeting-and-the-financial-crisis-victory-declared-but/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/axp/" rel="tag">American Express (AXP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/theobamas.jpg" alt="" />The G-20 summit was a true public relations success. There were no walkouts by France or any other country as had been previously feared. There were statements that protectionism should be avoided. It appeared that the world learned the lesson from Smoot Hawley Tariff Act during the Hoover administration. There was a commitment to fund the International Monetary Fund with additional capital. Despite low expectations, there appeared to be an international consensus by the G-20 nations.</p>
<p>President Obama was warmly received by all the G-20 nations. This was in sharp contrast to the chilly reception of the Bush administration at prior G-20 summits.</p>
<p><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/08/the-g-20-meeting-and-the-financial-crisis-victory-declared-but/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The G-20 Meeting and the Financial Crisis: Victory declared but massive economic problems Remain!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/08/the-g-20-meeting-and-the-financial-crisis-victory-declared-but/">The G-20 Meeting and the Financial Crisis: Victory declared but massive economic problems Remain!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 08 Apr 2009 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/08/the-g-20-meeting-and-the-financial-crisis-victory-declared-but/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1511715/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/08/the-g-20-meeting-and-the-financial-crisis-victory-declared-but/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>g-20</category><category>imf</category><category>president obama</category><category>PresidentObama</category><category>smoot hawley</category><category>SmootHawley</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas S. Roberts]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Poll: Americans more-optimistic about U.S. economy, president's performance]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/poll-americans-more-optimistic-about-u-s-economy-presidents/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/poll-americans-more-optimistic-about-u-s-economy-presidents/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/poll-americans-more-optimistic-about-u-s-economy-presidents/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/04/barack_obama_flag_200.jpg" alt="" />Despite a deepening job slump and few signs that the recession that began in December 2007 is nearing an end, Americans have grown more optimistic about the U.S. economy and the country's direction in the 11 weeks since the inauguration of President Obama, the latest <a href="http://documents.nytimes.com/new-york-times-cbs-news-poll-on-the-approval-ratings-of-president-barack-obama#p=2">New York Times/CBS News poll shows</a>.</p>
<p>Further, Americans approve of President Obama's handling of the economy, foreign policy, (wars in Iraq and Afghanistan), and two-thirds said they approved of his overall job performance.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/poll-americans-more-optimistic-about-u-s-economy-presidents/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Poll: Americans more-optimistic about U.S. economy, president's performance</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/poll-americans-more-optimistic-about-u-s-economy-presidents/">Poll: Americans more-optimistic about U.S. economy, president's performance</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/poll-americans-more-optimistic-about-u-s-economy-presidents/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1510252/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/poll-americans-more-optimistic-about-u-s-economy-presidents/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>approval rating</category><category>CBS</category><category>CBS Corp.</category><category>Democratic Party</category><category>New York Times</category><category>NYT</category><category>Obama</category><category>optimism</category><category>polls</category><category>President Obama</category><category>public opinion</category><category>Republican Party</category><category>survey research</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA['Don't fight the Fed' market regaining lost ground]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/25/dont-fight-the-fed-market-regaining-lost-ground/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/25/dont-fight-the-fed-market-regaining-lost-ground/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/25/dont-fight-the-fed-market-regaining-lost-ground/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/federal_reserve.jpg" alt="" />Two weeks have passed since I posted <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/11/is-the-stock-market-spring-loaded/" title="View Is the stock market spring loaded? Could it move 3,000 points higher now? on BloggingStocks" target="_blank">Is the stock market spring loaded? Could it move 3,000 points higher now?</a> and the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dow-jones-industrial-average/%24indu/dji">Dow Jones Industrial Average</a> has climbed about 750 points finishing yesterday at 7660. That is after a day in which it went down 116 points giving up some of Mondays gains.<br /><br />There is an old adage on Wall Street that simply states,<strong> <a href="http://ezinearticles.com/?Dont-Fight-The-Fed&amp;id=20746">"Don't fight the Fed"</a></strong>. It is has been referred to and commented on for years and we are seeing it in action again. We saw it last week when Ben Bernanke the Federal Reserve Chairman was going to speak and some wondered what he might be able to do to help the ailing economy, since the adage, in general, refers to interest rate movement.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/25/dont-fight-the-fed-market-regaining-lost-ground/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>'Don't fight the Fed' market regaining lost ground</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/25/dont-fight-the-fed-market-regaining-lost-ground/">'Don't fight the Fed' market regaining lost ground</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/25/dont-fight-the-fed-market-regaining-lost-ground/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1496072/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/25/dont-fight-the-fed-market-regaining-lost-ground/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ben Bernanke</category><category>BenBernanke</category><category>deficit spending</category><category>DeficitSpending</category><category>Dont fight the fed</category><category>DontFightTheFed</category><category>featured</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>national budget</category><category>NationalBudget</category><category>President Obama</category><category>PresidentObama</category><category>tim geithner</category><category>TimGeithner</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[From gold standard to no standard: 'Lightspeed inflation']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/24/from-gold-standard-to-no-standard-lightspeed-inflation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/24/from-gold-standard-to-no-standard-lightspeed-inflation/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/24/from-gold-standard-to-no-standard-lightspeed-inflation/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfc/" rel="tag">Wells Fargo (WFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" height="187" border="1" align="right" width="240" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/379607227_0a55b00d2a.jpg" alt="" />In one of my previous blogs: <a target="_blank" title="View Is the stock market spring loaded? Could it move 3,000 points higher now? on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/11/is-the-stock-market-spring-loaded/">Is the stock market spring loaded?</a> I coined the phrase <strong><em><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_light">Lightspeed</a> Inflation</em> </strong>in reference to the rate at which the government was able to dilute our currency. It is time we stopped referring to the government's over spending as "running the printing presses".<br /><br />We have reached a point, given our maximum note size of $100, that we would actually be better off if the government did have to print the money. Now they can just add whatever amount they want to the balance sheet electronically.<em><strong></strong></em><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/24/from-gold-standard-to-no-standard-lightspeed-inflation/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>From gold standard to no standard: 'Lightspeed inflation'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/24/from-gold-standard-to-no-standard-lightspeed-inflation/">From gold standard to no standard: 'Lightspeed inflation'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/24/from-gold-standard-to-no-standard-lightspeed-inflation/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1496660/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/24/from-gold-standard-to-no-standard-lightspeed-inflation/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bill clinton</category><category>BillClinton</category><category>currency</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>George W. Bush</category><category>GeorgeW.Bush</category><category>gold standard</category><category>goldman sachs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>GoldStandard</category><category>GS</category><category>Inflation</category><category>lightspeed inflation</category><category>LightspeedInflation</category><category>president obama</category><category>PresidentObama</category><category>wells fargo</category><category>WellsFargo</category><category>WFC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Economic firestorm: Which costs more, stealing or stupidity?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/economic-firestorm-which-cost-more-stealing-or-stupidity/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/economic-firestorm-which-cost-more-stealing-or-stupidity/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/economic-firestorm-which-cost-more-stealing-or-stupidity/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/fire-break.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />The economic firestorm that we are in the midst of is yet to be contained, or for that matter, completely understood.<br /><br />Some things are very clear like the fact we spent more than we earned, as individuals and as a nation, for decades on end. That we know for sure, and regardless of who we blame the most for this situation there is no bigger economic mistake one can make.<br /><br />This is something that I harp on often, and I expect I will keep on doing so because I do not have any reason to believe things will change; see: <a title="View Ignore Washington -- keep saving; General Patton makes a point on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/ignore-washington-keep-saving-general-patton-makes-a-point/" target="_blank">Ignore Washington -- keep saving; General Patton makes a point</a>.<br /><br /><em><br /></em><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/economic-firestorm-which-cost-more-stealing-or-stupidity/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Economic firestorm: Which costs more, stealing or stupidity?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/economic-firestorm-which-cost-more-stealing-or-stupidity/">Economic firestorm: Which costs more, stealing or stupidity?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 09 Mar 2009 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/economic-firestorm-which-cost-more-stealing-or-stupidity/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1456317/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/economic-firestorm-which-cost-more-stealing-or-stupidity/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>balanced budget</category><category>BalancedBudget</category><category>Congress</category><category>Economic Fire Breaks</category><category>Economic Fire Storm</category><category>EconomicFireBreaks</category><category>EconomicFireStorm</category><category>featured</category><category>federal spending</category><category>FederalSpending</category><category>Health Care</category><category>HealthCare</category><category>national debt</category><category>NationalDebt</category><category>President Bush</category><category>President Obama</category><category>PresidentBush</category><category>PresidentObama</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>stealing</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Today's technical outlook: Obama's bad timing]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/todays-technical-outlook-obamas-bad-timing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/todays-technical-outlook-obamas-bad-timing/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/todays-technical-outlook-obamas-bad-timing/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nasdaq/" rel="tag">NASDAQ</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/sams-chart.jpg" alt="" />Since Obama's inauguration, the market seems to have responded negatively to the president's rhetoric, and yesterday was no exception. Within seconds of a White House alert that the president and his chief economic advisers would make an important announcement, stocks headed south. <br /><br />And by the time that President Obama -- flanked by his team -- began the address at 3:50 p.m. Eastern, the Dow had given up more than 100 points, with investors fearful that the team had decided on a major policy shift.<br /><br />Despite the poor timing of the White House's news conference, which contained little new information and spooked traders into a flurry of profit-taking, Wednesday's small correction did little to change Tuesday's upside reversal and the probability of further buying.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/todays-technical-outlook-obamas-bad-timing/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Today's technical outlook: Obama's bad timing</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/todays-technical-outlook-obamas-bad-timing/">Today's technical outlook: Obama's bad timing</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/todays-technical-outlook-obamas-bad-timing/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1472373/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/26/todays-technical-outlook-obamas-bad-timing/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barack obama</category><category>BarackObama</category><category>president obama</category><category>PresidentObama</category><category>s and p 500</category><category>sam collins</category><category>SamCollins</category><category>SAndP500</category><category>standard and poors</category><category>StandardAndPoors</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>TechnicalAnalysis</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Collins]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can President Obama afford a third strike with his Commerce Secretary?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/can-president-obama-afford-a-third-strike-with-his-commerce-secr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/can-president-obama-afford-a-third-strike-with-his-commerce-secr/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/can-president-obama-afford-a-third-strike-with-his-commerce-secr/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/symc/" rel="tag">Symantec Corp (SYMC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/obamapict..jpg" /> President Obama is now searching for a third candidate to fill the Commerce Secretary position now that Senator Judd Gregg has <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123447333424979131.html" target="_blank">withdrawn his name from consideration for the position</a>. Scouring the Intrawebs, it seems that the word that most people are using for this rebuff is "embarrassment." While I am a dyed-in-the-wool Republican, I don't know if I would go as far as saying this is an embarrassment - the President tried to reach across party lines and got bit. In fact (and I am watching out for lightning here), Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel hit the nail on the head when he said, "It's better we discovered it now than later ... If I said it wasn't a disappointment, that would lack credibility."<br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/can-president-obama-afford-a-third-strike-with-his-commerce-secr/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Can President Obama afford a third strike with his Commerce Secretary?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/can-president-obama-afford-a-third-strike-with-his-commerce-secr/">Can President Obama afford a third strike with his Commerce Secretary?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/can-president-obama-afford-a-third-strike-with-his-commerce-secr/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1459402/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/13/can-president-obama-afford-a-third-strike-with-his-commerce-secr/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bill Gates</category><category>BillGates</category><category>inthenews</category><category>John Thompson</category><category>JohnThompson</category><category>President Obama</category><category>PresidentObama</category><category>Secretary of Commerce</category><category>SecretaryOfCommerce</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:02:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
