<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Hertz giving up on fuel gouging, more rental car companies may follow]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/18/hertz-giving-up-on-fuel-gouging-more-rental-car-companies-may-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/18/hertz-giving-up-on-fuel-gouging-more-rental-car-companies-may-f/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/18/hertz-giving-up-on-fuel-gouging-more-rental-car-companies-may-f/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hertz-global-holdings-inc/htz/nys">Hertz</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hertz-global-holdings-inc/htz/nys">HTZ</a>) <a href="http://easypr.marketwire.com/easyir/prssrel.do?easyirid=CFE3167792B1162D&amp;version=live&amp;prid=405339&amp;releasejsp=release_5051">has decided</a> to give up on the cash cow of wildly overcharging customers for filling up the tank. <a href="http://aviationblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2008/06/new-refueling-policy-for-hertz.html">Instead of charging $7 a gallon for gas, they'll charge the market price</a>. Oh, don't get me wrong, they'll still charge an outrageous fee for putting gas in the tank when the deal kicks in on July 1. They'll just charge a flat fee of $7 to fill up, plus the market price of gas. What does that translate to in terms of pay, about $100 an hour to pump gas?</p>
<p>I'm pleased that Hertz is getting out of the gas gouging business. Maybe that field has just gotten too competitive lately. It's getting harder to shock Americans with preposterous gas prices. Rental car companies have been charging insane gas rates -- almost what you'd pay in Europe at the pump -- for years. Consumers think of it as their evil little profit center, like phone charges at hotels.  </p>
<p>In a story at <a style="font-style: italic;" href="http://www.usatoday.com/travel/2008-06-16-car-rental-gas-price_N.htm">USAToday</a>, the industry claims that it's only overcharging to scare people into bringing the car back full, so they don't have to hassle with storing the fuel and filling up cars. So why don't they charge that rate for prepaid gas? USAToday did a survey and found that rental car companies sold pre-paid gas at about $4 a gallon, but charged about $8 when someone returned the car less than full.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/18/hertz-giving-up-on-fuel-gouging-more-rental-car-companies-may-f/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Hertz giving up on fuel gouging, more rental car companies may follow</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/18/hertz-giving-up-on-fuel-gouging-more-rental-car-companies-may-f/">Hertz giving up on fuel gouging, more rental car companies may follow</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/travel/2008-06-16-car-rental-gas-price_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/18/hertz-giving-up-on-fuel-gouging-more-rental-car-companies-may-f/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1229239/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/18/hertz-giving-up-on-fuel-gouging-more-rental-car-companies-may-f/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>avis</category><category>baltimore</category><category>gas</category><category>hertz</category><category>inthenews</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>price gouging</category><category>PriceGouging</category><category>rental car</category><category>RentalCar</category><category>thrifty</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Carol Vinzant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft pays the price again -- this time to California government agencies]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/microsoft-pays-the-price-again-this-time-to-california-govern/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/microsoft-pays-the-price-again-this-time-to-california-govern/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/microsoft-pays-the-price-again-this-time-to-california-govern/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p>California government agencies will get a piece of the pie from Microsoft now that they've settled theirprice-gouging lawsuit with with the company.&nbsp; Beneficiaries will include local school districts, regionaltransportation agencies and a wide variety of other state and local agencies that bought products from Microsoftstarting in 1995.</p>
<p>The $70 million dollar settlement, if approved by the court, will be divided among theeligible government entities as they buy new computer hardware and software.&nbsp; They don't have to buy the computerproducts from Microsoft. Competitor products can be bought&nbsp;with the money too.</p>
<p>This settlement is just atiny portion of the money Microsoft spends each year as it settles its lawsuits. In fact, according to its 2005 annualreport, as of June 20, 2005, Microsoft accrued liabilities totaling $2.661 billion for both current liabilities andlong-term liabilities related to all&nbsp;its legal contingencies - and that's only the ones that have beensettled.&nbsp; There are lots of cases out there still winding their way through the courts.&nbsp; Microsoft does nothave to&nbsp;report&nbsp;expected legal costs from a&nbsp;lawsuit&nbsp;until&nbsp;there is a final court ruling afterall appeals are exhausted or there is a settlement.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/microsoft-pays-the-price-again-this-time-to-california-govern/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft pays the price again -- this time to California government agencies</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/microsoft-pays-the-price-again-this-time-to-california-govern/">Microsoft pays the price again -- this time to California government agencies</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 03 May 2006 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://articles.news.aol.com/business/article.adp?id=20060502205209990007&amp;cid=>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/microsoft-pays-the-price-again-this-time-to-california-govern/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/614421/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/microsoft-pays-the-price-again-this-time-to-california-govern/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>IBM</category><category>lawsuits</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>price gouging</category><category>PriceGouging</category><category>Sun Microsystems</category><category>SunMicrosystems</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lita Epstein]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
