<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Citigroup Upgraded to Buy]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/22/citigroup-upgraded-to-buy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/22/citigroup-upgraded-to-buy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/22/citigroup-upgraded-to-buy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/citi_sign_240.jpg" />Citigroup, Inc. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) attracted a bullish note this morning from analyst Richard Bove of Rochdale Securities. The outspoken financial analyst <a href="http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/markets/industries/finance/rochdale-upgrades-citi-buy-shares-rise/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+foxbusiness%2Ffinance+%28Text+-+Industries+-+Finance%29">hiked his rating</a> on the shares from neutral to buy, citing the banking issue's healthy liquidity position.</p>
<p>"This gives management the flexibility to off-load the problem operations and to support longer term growth," wrote Bove in a note to clients. "It will be a money-making machine again and the stock is long-term cheap."</p>
<p>Bove also raised his price target on Citi shares from $3.75 to $5, implying expected upside of 28.2% to the stock's closing price on Friday.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/22/citigroup-upgraded-to-buy/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Citigroup Upgraded to Buy</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/22/citigroup-upgraded-to-buy/">Citigroup Upgraded to Buy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/22/citigroup-upgraded-to-buy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19409205/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/22/citigroup-upgraded-to-buy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>C</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>price target</category><category>PriceTarget</category><category>Richard Bove</category><category>RichardBove</category><category>Rochdale Securities</category><category>RochdaleSecurities</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>TechnicalAnalysis</category><category>upgrade</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Morgan Stanley upgrades General Mills]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/06/morgan-stanley-upgrades-general-mills/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/06/morgan-stanley-upgrades-general-mills/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/06/morgan-stanley-upgrades-general-mills/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gis/" rel="tag">General Mills (GIS)</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/generalmills.jpg" />How about a little upgrade with your Tuesday morning breakfast? Morgan Stanley thought it was a good idea, boosting <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-mills-inc/gis/nys">General Mills</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-mills-inc/gis/nys">GIS</a>) <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/general-mills-upgraded-by-morgan-stanley-2009-10-06">to Overweight</a> from Equal-Weight and added it was late in making the upgrade. <br /><br />The brokerage cited valuation as the reason for the upgrade, noting that GIS is "one of the best positioned" companies in the realm of food. Morgan Stanley felt that this was not reflected in GIS's valuation, so it upped the food firm and raised its price target to $72 from $64.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/06/morgan-stanley-upgrades-general-mills/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Morgan Stanley upgrades General Mills</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/06/morgan-stanley-upgrades-general-mills/">Morgan Stanley upgrades General Mills</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 06 Oct 2009 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/06/morgan-stanley-upgrades-general-mills/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19185788/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/06/morgan-stanley-upgrades-general-mills/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cereal</category><category>food</category><category>inthenews</category><category>morgan stanely</category><category>MorganStanely</category><category>price target</category><category>PriceTarget</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple Inc. buoyed by Barclays' price-target boost]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/apple-inc-buoyed-by-barclays-price-target-boost/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/apple-inc-buoyed-by-barclays-price-target-boost/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/apple-inc-buoyed-by-barclays-price-target-boost/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/apple.jpg" />Brokerage firm Barclays this morning raised its price target on <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) from $188 to $208. The new target represents a premium of 25.8% to AAPL's closing price on Wednesday. Additionally, Barclays reiterated its <a href="http://www.streetinsider.com/Analyst+Comments/Barclays+Lifts+Target+on+Apple+%28AAPL%29+from+%24188+to+%24208/4872381.html">upbeat Overweight rating</a> on the shares.</p>
<p>In a note to clients, analyst Ben Reitzes cited Apple's solid product pipeline and strong free cash flow outlook. "New products should begin to flow again within a few weeks," said Reitzes. "We are more upbeat about the long-term prospects for the iPhone &amp; Mac lines with potential new products."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/apple-inc-buoyed-by-barclays-price-target-boost/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Apple Inc. buoyed by Barclays' price-target boost</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/apple-inc-buoyed-by-barclays-price-target-boost/">Apple Inc. buoyed by Barclays' price-target boost</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/apple-inc-buoyed-by-barclays-price-target-boost/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19128145/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/13/apple-inc-buoyed-by-barclays-price-target-boost/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>analyst</category><category>Apple Inc.</category><category>AppleInc.</category><category>Barclays</category><category>inthenews</category><category>price target</category><category>PriceTarget</category><category>short sellers</category><category>ShortSellers</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>TechnicalAnalysis</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Harley-Davidson not riding too much higher according to analyst]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/harley-davidson-not-riding-too-much-higher-according-to-analyst/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/harley-davidson-not-riding-too-much-higher-according-to-analyst/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/harley-davidson-not-riding-too-much-higher-according-to-analyst/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hog/" rel="tag">Harley-Davidson (HOG)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/hog-harley-davidson-logo.jpg" />According to recent analyst opinion, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/harley-davidson-inc/hog/nys">Harley-Davidson</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/harley-davidson-inc/hog/nys">HOG</a>) is a business you should be wary of buying right now. <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/investor/content/jul2009/pi20090713_173812.htm?campaign_id=rss_aol_news">This item</a> reports on a reduction in the price target for the maker of the iconic motorcycle. Edward Aaron over at RBC Capital Markets thinks that earnings and demand won't be great for the company; he slashed his belief of what the shares are worth by $2 to $16 per share.
<p>Harley-Davidson has certainly recovered from its 52-week low made back in March of this year. The stock bounced back from $7.99 to a price of $16.55 as of this writing. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/harley-davidson-not-riding-too-much-higher-according-to-analyst/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Harley-Davidson not riding too much higher according to analyst</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/harley-davidson-not-riding-too-much-higher-according-to-analyst/">Harley-Davidson not riding too much higher according to analyst</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/investor/content/jul2009/pi20090713_173812.htm?campaign_id=rss_aol_news>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/harley-davidson-not-riding-too-much-higher-according-to-analyst/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19096364/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/harley-davidson-not-riding-too-much-higher-according-to-analyst/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Edward Aaron</category><category>EdwardAaron</category><category>Harley-Davidson</category><category>HOG</category><category>motorcycle</category><category>price target</category><category>PriceTarget</category><category>rbc capital markets</category><category>RbcCapitalMarkets</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[VMware rallies on Goldman Sachs' bullish endorsement]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/vmware-rallies-on-goldman-sachs-bullish-endorsement/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/vmware-rallies-on-goldman-sachs-bullish-endorsement/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/vmware-rallies-on-goldman-sachs-bullish-endorsement/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/vmw-vmware-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />Tech stock <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/vmware-inc/vmw/nys">VMware, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/vmware-inc/vmw/nys">VMW</a>) is broadly higher today on the heels of an upbeat note from Goldman Sachs. VMW was added to the brokerage firm's <a href="http://www.streetinsider.com/Analyst+Comments/VMware+%28VMW%29+Gets+Boost+From+Goldmans+Convicted+Buy/4530592.html">Conviction Buy list</a>, with Goldman noting an expected boost in sales. The firm also thinks that VMW is better-positioned than many of its competitors to ride out the economic recession.</p>
<p>In addition to the Conviction Buy nod, Goldman also hiked its price target on VMW to $29, representing a premium of 22.8% to the equity's Tuesday closing price. The stock could attract additional price-target increases during the short term, as Thomson Reuters pegs its average 12-month target from analysts as $23.31 -- a modest discount to yesterday's close.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/vmware-rallies-on-goldman-sachs-bullish-endorsement/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>VMware rallies on Goldman Sachs' bullish endorsement</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/vmware-rallies-on-goldman-sachs-bullish-endorsement/">VMware rallies on Goldman Sachs' bullish endorsement</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 01 Apr 2009 11:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/vmware-rallies-on-goldman-sachs-bullish-endorsement/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1504782/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/vmware-rallies-on-goldman-sachs-bullish-endorsement/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>conviction buy</category><category>ConvictionBuy</category><category>hedging</category><category>investor sentiment</category><category>InvestorSentiment</category><category>options</category><category>price target</category><category>PriceTarget</category><category>short interest</category><category>short sellers</category><category>ShortInterest</category><category>ShortSellers</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>TechnicalAnalysis</category><category>VMW</category><category>VMware</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 11:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Lockheed Martin hit with price-target cut on defense budget concerns]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/16/lockheed-martin-hit-with-price-target-cut-on-defense-budget-conc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/16/lockheed-martin-hit-with-price-target-cut-on-defense-budget-conc/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/16/lockheed-martin-hit-with-price-target-cut-on-defense-budget-conc/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lmt/" rel="tag">Lockheed Martin (LMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/lockheed-martin-logo-bg.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Analyst Douglas Harned of Sanford C. Bernstein chopped his price targets on several defense stocks today, including <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lockheed-martin-corporation/lmt/nys">Lockheed Martin Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lockheed-martin-corporation/lmt/nys">LMT</a>). "Trends in the defense budget remain the most important driver of defense stocks, and the cash flow outlook is strong for the defense businesses," said Harned in a note to clients. </p>
<p>Harned <a href="http://www.reuters.com/legacyArticle?duid=mtfh37822_2009-03-16_11-19-00_bng487471_newsml&amp;rpc=33&amp;type=marketsnews">cut LMT's price target</a> from $104 to $96, but he reiterated an "outperform" rating on the stock. Lockheed Martin remains the analyst's top pick in the defense sector, thanks to its strong overall growth potential and support from its F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program. Despite his forecast for a reduction in supplemental defense budgets, Harned expects the F-35 program will remain fully funded.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/16/lockheed-martin-hit-with-price-target-cut-on-defense-budget-conc/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Lockheed Martin hit with price-target cut on defense budget concerns</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/16/lockheed-martin-hit-with-price-target-cut-on-defense-budget-conc/">Lockheed Martin hit with price-target cut on defense budget concerns</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/16/lockheed-martin-hit-with-price-target-cut-on-defense-budget-conc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1489200/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/16/lockheed-martin-hit-with-price-target-cut-on-defense-budget-conc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>anlayst ratings</category><category>AnlaystRatings</category><category>defense budget</category><category>DefenseBudget</category><category>Douglas Harned</category><category>DouglasHarned</category><category>featured</category><category>investor sentiment</category><category>InvestorSentiment</category><category>LMT</category><category>lockheed martin</category><category>LockheedMartin</category><category>price target</category><category>PriceTarget</category><category>Sanford Bernstein</category><category>SanfordBernstein</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>TechnicalAnalysis</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[PrivateBancorp plummets after slashing its quarterly dividend]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/privatebancorp-plummets-after-slashing-its-quarterly-dividend/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/privatebancorp-plummets-after-slashing-its-quarterly-dividend/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/privatebancorp-plummets-after-slashing-its-quarterly-dividend/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/from-the-boards/" rel="tag">From the Boards</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/arrow_down_down_240.jpg" alt="" />The shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/privatebancorp-inc/pvtb/nas">PrivateBancorp</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/privatebancorp-inc/pvtb/nas">PVTB</a>) wasted no time in finding a fresh annual low this morning after the Chicago-based bank announced plans to <a href="http://www.reuters.com/legacyArticle?duid=mtfh20993_2009-03-05_13-01-11_bng456610_newsml&amp;rpc=33&amp;type=marketsnews">slash its dividend by 87%</a>. The quarterly payout will now be one penny per share, down from 7.5 cents per share. On the heels of this report, the stock quickly slipped to $9.65, marking its lowest price since September 2002.
<p>"Given the current economic and regulatory environment, we felt this was a prudent step to take to further enhance our capital position and our liquidity," said President and CEO Larry D. Richman in a statement.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/privatebancorp-plummets-after-slashing-its-quarterly-dividend/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>PrivateBancorp plummets after slashing its quarterly dividend</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/privatebancorp-plummets-after-slashing-its-quarterly-dividend/">PrivateBancorp plummets after slashing its quarterly dividend</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 05 Mar 2009 12:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/privatebancorp-plummets-after-slashing-its-quarterly-dividend/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1479655/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/privatebancorp-plummets-after-slashing-its-quarterly-dividend/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>capital</category><category>dividend</category><category>inthenews</category><category>liquidity</category><category>price target</category><category>PriceTarget</category><category>PrivateBancorp</category><category>PVTB</category><category>short sellers</category><category>ShortSellers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 12:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Level 3 Communications' price target slashed to 50 cents at Citi]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/level-3-communications-price-target-slashed-to-50-cents-at-citi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/level-3-communications-price-target-slashed-to-50-cents-at-citi/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/level-3-communications-price-target-slashed-to-50-cents-at-citi/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lvlt/" rel="tag">Level 3 Communications (LVLT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a></p><p>The shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/level-3-communications-inc/lvlt/nas">Level 3 Communications</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/level-3-communications-inc/lvlt/nas">LVLT</a>) are sinking deeper into penny-stock territory this morning following a damaging price-target cut from analysts at Citigroup. The brokerage firm slashed its price target on LVLT from $2.00 to 50 cents, and reiterated its Sell rating on the stock.</p>
<p>After closing Monday at 94 cents, LVLT is slipping ever closer this morning to that hypothetical "support at zero." In fact, following yesterday's <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/10/is-gm-worthless/">all-out bearish note</a> on <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>), one has to wonder if Deutsche Bank will soon be slapping another of its famous goose-egg targets on Level 3. The stock has closed seven out of the past 13 sessions south of the $1 level, and its descending 10-day and 20-day moving averages have provided stubborn resistance in recent months.</p>
<p>In fact, while many analysts have already denounced LVLT, there's still room for potential downgrades or price-target cuts. Zacks reports two Buy or better ratings from brokerage firms, and these bulls may soon be shamed into lowering their opinions (if so, they would join six analysts who consider the stock a Hold, and six who deem it a Sell or Strong Sell).</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Thomson Financial pegs the average 12-month price target at $1.68, a premium of 87% to the equity's closing price on Monday. While more negative notes could drag the shares lower, there is a bright side -- from their current level, the shares could only lose about 85 cents.</p>
<p><em>Elizabeth Harrow is an analyst and financial writer in the research department at </em><a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/"><em>Schaeffer's Investment Research</em></a><em>. She is featured in the video series </em><a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/commentary/podcasts/videocenter.aspx"><em>Schaeffer's Daily Q&amp;A</em></a><em> on SchaeffersResearch.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/level-3-communications-price-target-slashed-to-50-cents-at-citi/">Level 3 Communications' price target slashed to 50 cents at Citi</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 11 Nov 2008 11:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/level-3-communications-price-target-slashed-to-50-cents-at-citi/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1368442/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/level-3-communications-price-target-slashed-to-50-cents-at-citi/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analyst</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>downgrade</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Level 3 Communications</category><category>Level3Communications</category><category>LVLT</category><category>penny stock</category><category>PennyStock</category><category>price target</category><category>PriceTarget</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 11:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan slapped with a price-target cut]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/03/potash-corp-of-saskatchewan-slapped-with-a-price-target-cut/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/03/potash-corp-of-saskatchewan-slapped-with-a-price-target-cut/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/03/potash-corp-of-saskatchewan-slapped-with-a-price-target-cut/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/agriculture/" rel="tag">Agriculture</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pot/" rel="tag">Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan (POT)</a></p><p>Fertilizer firm <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/potash-corporation-of-saskatchewan-inc/pot/nys">Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/potash-corporation-of-saskatchewan-inc/pot/nys">POT</a>) was hit with a price-target cut from analysts at UBS today. The brokerage firm slashed its target price from $150 to $130, but reiterated its Buy rating on the stock. It's been a schizophrenic day for the company, brokerage-wise; the late-breaking note from UBS effectively dashed the upward momentum POT gained this morning when Dundee upgraded the North American fertilizer sector to Overweight.</p>
<p>In fact, "schizophrenic" more or less sums up analyst activity on POT during the past several weeks. Following its <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsnews/idCABNG2149320081023?rpc=33">third-quarter earnings report</a> on October 23, Potash Corp. received no fewer than five price-target cuts, along with three reiterations of bullish Buy or better ratings, plus an upgrade. To make matters even more interesting, this is the second price-target cut UBS has issued on POT in the past week -- the first cut, on October 29, was from $165 to $150.</p>
<p>According to Thomson Financial, the deluge of downward revisions might not be over yet. POT's average 12-month price target is $115.98. This consensus estimate represents a rather healthy premium of 36% to the stock's closing price last Friday. Considering that POT shares have plummeted about 41% year-to-date, it seems safe to say that expectations might be too high for this Canadian import.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/03/potash-corp-of-saskatchewan-slapped-with-a-price-target-cut/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan slapped with a price-target cut</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/03/potash-corp-of-saskatchewan-slapped-with-a-price-target-cut/">Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan slapped with a price-target cut</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 03 Nov 2008 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/03/potash-corp-of-saskatchewan-slapped-with-a-price-target-cut/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1360980/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/03/potash-corp-of-saskatchewan-slapped-with-a-price-target-cut/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analyst</category><category>options</category><category>POT</category><category>Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan</category><category>PotashCorp.OfSaskatchewan</category><category>price target</category><category>PriceTarget</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>TechnicalAnalysis</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple attracts an upgrade on valuation, but can't escape price-target cuts]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/13/apple-attracts-an-upgrade-on-valuation-but-cant-escape-price-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/13/apple-attracts-an-upgrade-on-valuation-but-cant-escape-price-t/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/13/apple-attracts-an-upgrade-on-valuation-but-cant-escape-price-t/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/iphone/" rel="tag">iPhone</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/apple.jpg" alt="" />On October 3, the shares of <a href="javascript:void(0);/*1223909875971*/">Apple Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) dropped below the $100 mark for the first time since May 2007. In fact, the stock dropped last Friday to a new 52-week low of $85, representing a 19-month nadir for the iPhone parent. Today, this price plunge served as the catalyst for a valuation-based upgrade from Bernstein.
<p>In a note to clients, Bernstein <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/99689-apple-rallies-early-as-bernstein-upgrades?source=feed">boosted its rating</a> on AAPL from Market Perform to Outperform, and said that its "longer-term growth story remains intact." Analyst A.M. Sacconaghi added, "Investors appear to be valuing Apple on an earnings multiple, rather than on cash flow, which fundamentally undervalues the company given the huge deferred revenue growth associated with the iPhone."</p>
<p>Specifically, the brokerage firm estimates that the iPhone itself could add between $2.25 and $3.40 per share to cash flow above earnings in fiscal 2009.</p>
<p>However, following the stock's recent free-fall down the charts, Bernstein was forced to trim its price target on AAPL from $175 to $135. Credit Suisse followed suit, slashing its price target on the equity from $200 to $135. Despite today's gain of about 7% amid a massive rally in U.S. stocks, Apple shares could be vulnerable to more price-target cuts during the near term. Thomson Financial pegs the average 12-month price target at $176.33, a lofty premium of 82% to Friday's close at $96.80.</p>
<p><em>Elizabeth Harrow is an analyst and financial writer in the research department at <a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/">Schaeffer's Investment Research</a>. She is featured in the video series <a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/commentary/podcasts/videocenter.aspx">Schaeffer's Daily Q&amp;A</a> on SchaeffersResearch.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/13/apple-attracts-an-upgrade-on-valuation-but-cant-escape-price-t/">Apple attracts an upgrade on valuation, but can't escape price-target cuts</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/13/apple-attracts-an-upgrade-on-valuation-but-cant-escape-price-t/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1340470/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/13/apple-attracts-an-upgrade-on-valuation-but-cant-escape-price-t/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>analyst</category><category>apple inc</category><category>AppleInc</category><category>inthenews</category><category>iPhone</category><category>price target</category><category>PriceTarget</category><category>upgrade</category><category>valuation</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:44:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[China Mobile scores an upgrade, but plunges on price-target cut]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/29/china-mobile-scores-an-upgrade-but-plunges-on-price-target-cut/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/29/china-mobile-scores-an-upgrade-but-plunges-on-price-target-cut/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/29/china-mobile-scores-an-upgrade-but-plunges-on-price-target-cut/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chl/" rel="tag">China Mobile Limited (CHL)</a></p><p>On a day when many telecom stocks were hit with <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/29/before-the-bell-big-plunge-expected-wb-wfc-c-bud-imcl-cc/">downgrades</a>, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/china-mobile-limited/chl/nys">China Mobile Limited</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/china-mobile-limited/chl/nys">CHL</a>) distinguished itself this morning by scoring an upgrade. Goldman Sachs <a href="http://www.streetinsider.com/Upgrades/Goldman+Sachs+Upgrades+China+Mobile+Limited+%28CHL%29+to+Neutral/4023553.html">raised its rating</a> on CHL from "sell" to "neutral," while simultaneously trimming the stock's price target from HK$95 to HK$90. The price-target cut echoes a similar move made by Citigroup on Sunday; the brokerage firm cut its target on CHL from HK$120 to HK$100.</p>
<p>In response to today's mixed analyst comment, CHL is down more than 7% at midday. The equity has shed about 42% year-to-date, and its lengthy decline could prompt additional price-target cuts during the short term. According to Thomson Financial, China Mobile shares are trading about 60% south of their average 12-month price target of USD $81.01.</p>
<p>Today's upgrade from Goldman comes as CHL is approaching former support at the $44 level. This region buoyed the stock in early 2007 and earlier this month, which suggests that it could once again provide a floor for the shares. Unfortunately, though, the stock is also looking up at stiff technical resistance from its 10-week moving average, which means China Mobile might find itself bouncing sideways in the weeks to come. Or -- even more troubling -- a continued drop in the share price could spark an unwinding of widespread optimistic sentiment.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/29/china-mobile-scores-an-upgrade-but-plunges-on-price-target-cut/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>China Mobile scores an upgrade, but plunges on price-target cut</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/29/china-mobile-scores-an-upgrade-but-plunges-on-price-target-cut/">China Mobile scores an upgrade, but plunges on price-target cut</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/29/china-mobile-scores-an-upgrade-but-plunges-on-price-target-cut/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1327458/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/29/china-mobile-scores-an-upgrade-but-plunges-on-price-target-cut/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>china mobile</category><category>china mobile limited</category><category>ChinaMobile</category><category>ChinaMobileLimited</category><category>CHL</category><category>inthenews</category><category>options</category><category>price target</category><category>PriceTarget</category><category>telecom</category><category>upgrade</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nokia hit with price-target cuts, slammed by RIM's weakness]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/26/nokia-hit-with-price-target-cuts-slammed-by-rims-weakness/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/26/nokia-hit-with-price-target-cuts-slammed-by-rims-weakness/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/26/nokia-hit-with-price-target-cuts-slammed-by-rims-weakness/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nok/" rel="tag">Nokia Corp. (NOK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rimm/" rel="tag">Research in Motion (RIMM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/smartphones/" rel="tag">Smartphones</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/blackberry.jpg" alt="" />Forget finance -- it's a rough day to be a handset maker. Following a <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/26/before-the-bell-stocks-to-tank-wm-rimm-aapl-msft-hbc-kbh/">widely panned earnings report</a> from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/research-in-motion-limited/rimm/nas">Research In Motion Limited</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/research-in-motion-limited/rimm/nas">RIMM</a>), Finnish firm <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nokia-corporation/nok/nys">Nokia Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nokia-corporation/nok/nys">NOK</a>) was slapped with price-target cuts from JP Morgan and ING. What's more, Dresdner Kleinwort warned that RIM's weak gross-margin guidance will most likely be echoed by Nokia.
<p> </p>
<p>Digging into the various reports, JP Morgan and ING both slashed their price target on Nokia from 11 euros to 10 euros per share. JP Morgan reiterated its "underweight" rating, and said it still thinks Nokia can increase its market share -- just not as much as the company might have hoped. The brokerage firm also sees replacement cycles growing by 6.5 months in 2009.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Dresdner Kleinwort backed its 'hold" rating and its 15-euro target price, but warned that gross margins across the sector will remain under pressure through 2010.</p>
<p>The barrage of bearish brokerage notes -- along with RIM's disappointing turn in the earnings spotlight -- has NOK more than 4% lower at midday. Today's plunge likely came as a disappointment to enthusiastic option players; yesterday, traders on the International Securities Exchange (ISE) and the Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) bought to open 25,322 calls on NOK, compared to just 346 puts.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/26/nokia-hit-with-price-target-cuts-slammed-by-rims-weakness/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Nokia hit with price-target cuts, slammed by RIM's weakness</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/26/nokia-hit-with-price-target-cuts-slammed-by-rims-weakness/">Nokia hit with price-target cuts, slammed by RIM's weakness</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/26/nokia-hit-with-price-target-cuts-slammed-by-rims-weakness/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1325520/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/26/nokia-hit-with-price-target-cuts-slammed-by-rims-weakness/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analyst</category><category>inthenews</category><category>NOK</category><category>Nokia</category><category>options</category><category>price target</category><category>PriceTarget</category><category>research in motion</category><category>ResearchInMotion</category><category>rim</category><category>RIMM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Evergreen Solar scores an upgrade, despite Lehman-related losses]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/17/evergreen-solar-scores-an-upgrade-despite-lehman-related-losses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/17/evergreen-solar-scores-an-upgrade-despite-lehman-related-losses/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/17/evergreen-solar-scores-an-upgrade-despite-lehman-related-losses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/leh/" rel="tag">Lehman Br Holdings (LEH)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/evergreen-solar-eslr.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/evergreen-solar-inc/eslr/nas">Evergreen Solar, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/evergreen-solar-inc/eslr/nas">ESLR</a>) plunged to an all-time low of $3.30 on Tuesday, thanks to the widespread ripple effect caused by Lehman Brothers' bankruptcy filing. As Evergreen confessed to a potentially substantial <a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/commentary/optionbytes.aspx?c=bytefeed&amp;byteID=87764&amp;single=true">Lehman-related loss</a>, analysts rushed yesterday to hand out price-target cuts. Today, Citigroup bucked the trend by upgrading ESLR from "sell" to "hold."</p>
<p>The bullish note seems primarily based on increased transparency regarding the Lehman situation, as well as a sharp decline in the stock's valuation. In a <a href="http://www.streetinsider.com/Upgrades/Citi+Upgrades+Evergreen+Solar+%28ESLR%29+to+Hold/3996052.html">note to clients</a>, Citigroup clarified, "With ESLR more clearly defining its exposure to a Lehman Bros. bankruptcy, the worst-case scenario is now well-defined . . . these issues appear much better discounted at current levels."</p>
<p>In response to the upgrade, ESLR has added more than 13% today. The shares are trading around the $5 mark, though, which puts them in territory not previously explored since May 2005. The stock's year-to-date loss now totals 75% -- a stomach-churning plunge, for sure, but the stubbornly bullish sentiment among investors suggests that more downside may be in store for Evergreen Solar.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/17/evergreen-solar-scores-an-upgrade-despite-lehman-related-losses/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Evergreen Solar scores an upgrade, despite Lehman-related losses</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/17/evergreen-solar-scores-an-upgrade-despite-lehman-related-losses/">Evergreen Solar scores an upgrade, despite Lehman-related losses</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 17 Sep 2008 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/17/evergreen-solar-scores-an-upgrade-despite-lehman-related-losses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1316561/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/17/evergreen-solar-scores-an-upgrade-despite-lehman-related-losses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bankruptcy</category><category>ESLR</category><category>evergreen solar</category><category>EvergreenSolar</category><category>inthenews</category><category>LEH</category><category>Lehman Brothers</category><category>LehmanBrothers</category><category>price target</category><category>PriceTarget</category><category>upgrade</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wachovia bounces, then fizzles, on price-target boost]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/22/wachovia-bounces-then-fizzles-on-price-target-boost/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/22/wachovia-bounces-then-fizzles-on-price-target-boost/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/22/wachovia-bounces-then-fizzles-on-price-target-boost/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wb/" rel="tag">Wachovia Corp (WB)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/leh/" rel="tag">Lehman Br Holdings (LEH)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/wb-wachovia-logo.jpg" alt="" />The shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wachovia-corporation/wb/nys">Wachovia Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wachovia-corporation/wb/nys">WB</a>) opened on a gain of nearly 6% this morning, thanks to a positive note from brokerage firm UBS. The analysts raised their price target on WB from $12.50 to $16, and reiterated a "neutral" rating. However, the stock has wasted no time in whittling its early morning gains, and slipped into negative territory before midday.</p>
<p>Yesterday, Wachovia shares closed lower after Friedman Billings &amp; Ramsey <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/analyst-calls-crm-mee-artc-aci-aet-wb/">reinitiated coverage</a> at "underperform." No surprise there -- but, in today's session, the equity is declining on what should have been a bullish boost from UBS. In fact, most financial stocks are higher today following speculation on a <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/22/will-lehman-go-korean/">potential buyout bid</a> for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lehman-brothers-holdings-inc/leh/nys">Lehman Brothers</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lehman-brothers-holdings-inc/leh/nys">LEH</a>). The <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/financial-select-sector-spdr-fun/xlf/ase">Select Sector SPDR Financial Fund</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/financial-select-sector-spdr-fun/xlf/ase">XLF</a>) is sitting on a gain of more than 2% at last check.</p>
<br />
<p><em><a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/commentary/podcasts/videocenter.aspx"><br /></a></em></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/22/wachovia-bounces-then-fizzles-on-price-target-boost/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Wachovia bounces, then fizzles, on price-target boost</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/22/wachovia-bounces-then-fizzles-on-price-target-boost/">Wachovia bounces, then fizzles, on price-target boost</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 22 Aug 2008 12:06:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/22/wachovia-bounces-then-fizzles-on-price-target-boost/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1292243/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/22/wachovia-bounces-then-fizzles-on-price-target-boost/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analyst</category><category>finance</category><category>inthenews</category><category>lehman brothers</category><category>LehmanBrothers</category><category>price target</category><category>PriceTarget</category><category>wachovia</category><category>wb</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 12:06:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Newell Rubbermaid upgraded across the board]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/15/newell-rubbermaid-upgraded-across-the-board/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/15/newell-rubbermaid-upgraded-across-the-board/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/15/newell-rubbermaid-upgraded-across-the-board/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nwl/" rel="tag">Newell Rubbermaid (NWL)</a></p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/02/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" /></a>Newell Rubbermaid Inc (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/newell-rubbermaid-inc/nwl/nys">NWL</a>) held it analyst day with the investment community on Tuesday. Yesterday, Newell was getting upgraded across the board.<br /><br />We began blogging about the merits of Newell's turnaround <a href="http://theflyonthewallblog.blogspot.com/2006/04/through-theflys-eyes-newell-rubbermaid.html">back in April</a> when the stock was trading at $26, today the stock is around $31, up 19%. Merrill, Smith Barney and Oppenheimer have raised its price targets to $34-to-$35 price range.<br /><br />In my opinion, the analysts' price targets are too low. Estimates are for Newell to earn $1.95 per share, but Newell will most likely earn over $2.00. Also, as the company exceeds earnings expectations, the P/E investors are willing to pay will go from 18x to 20x. I see Newell's stock price approaching $40 by the end of 2007.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/15/newell-rubbermaid-upgraded-across-the-board/">Newell Rubbermaid upgraded across the board</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 15 Feb 2007 12:54:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/15/newell-rubbermaid-upgraded-across-the-board/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/754447/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/15/newell-rubbermaid-upgraded-across-the-board/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>merrill lynch</category><category>MerrillLynch</category><category>mlco</category><category>newell</category><category>nwl</category><category>opco</category><category>oppenheimer</category><category>price target</category><category>PriceTarget</category><category>rubbermaid</category><category>sbsh</category><category>smith barney</category><category>SmithBarney</category><category>upgrade</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 12:54:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner target trimmed at CIBC]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/13/time-warner-target-trimmed-at-cibc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/13/time-warner-target-trimmed-at-cibc/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/13/time-warner-target-trimmed-at-cibc/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p>Despite Time Warner Inc. (NYSE: TWX) bringing to Google Inc (NASDAQ: GOOG) its <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articlehybrid.aspx?type=comktNews&amp;rpc=33&amp;storyid=2006-10-13T055550Z_01_L1380422_RTRIDST_0_MEDIA-GOOGLE-LEGAL.XML">concerns over potential copyright issues</a> on YouTube, and despite all of the efforts the company is taking to streamline its operations, not "every" analyst is finding a new fresh positive bias on the stock. <br /><br />This morning CIBC noted a lack of confidence in the ongoing turnaround and direction of Time Warner's AOL unit. The firm lowered its stock price target down to $20 from its previous $21 target, and maintained its Sector Perform rating on the stock. It feels the sum of the parts is now around that $20 level.<br /><br />This follows the Merrill Lynch upgrade yesterday. So far the street has taken little interest in this research note this morning. CIBC is actually not even listed as one of the top eight analysts according to StarMine.<br /><br />TWX is down 21 cents, or 1%, to $19.03 at 2:45 p.m. today after putting in a new 52-week high for a closing price of $19.24 yesterday.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/13/time-warner-target-trimmed-at-cibc/">Time Warner target trimmed at CIBC</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 13 Oct 2006 02:48:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/13/time-warner-target-trimmed-at-cibc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/684306/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/13/time-warner-target-trimmed-at-cibc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CIBC</category><category>price target</category><category>PriceTarget</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>twx</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 02:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Goldman raises Microsoft target to $33]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/15/goldman-raises-microsoft-target-to-33/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/15/goldman-raises-microsoft-target-to-33/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/15/goldman-raises-microsoft-target-to-33/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><p>In a research note today, Rick Sherlund of Goldman Sachs lifted his target on Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) from $30 to $33. Sherlund is considered "The Axe" on The Street -- the analyst most accurate and connected to Microsoft. </p>
<p>As reasons for the upgrade, his note cited share buybacks, but he was also positive on new product releases. He is also encouraged by the initial feedback on Windows Vista, especially since we are essentially one quarter away from its launch. The research note also raises expectations for<a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/microsoft-releases-details-of-ipod/n20060915030909990012"> Microsoft's new Zune media player debuted yesterday</a>, but Sherlund thinks that the Apple share of the market and loyalty to iTunes could be a market constraint.</p>
<p>One interesting note here is that he had modeled a March launch for Vista and now thinks it will be a late January or early February launch. He believes vouchers or coupons will be released in late November so that the PC sales for the holidays will not be slowed by customers waiting for the operating system upgrade. He laid out a few scenarios about what that could mean financially, but he anticipated a revenue change to his model of only 2% - 4%.</p>
<p>The last part of Sherland's note said that he expects Xbox 360 to win out over Sony's PS3 and he even stated that he expects Xbox will be a profitable operation one year out.</p>
<p>This research note actually has a lot of "update" information in it that one would have honestly expected him to have already come out with, but since he is the Axe, you can expect others to follow suit with positive commentary on Microsoft. Most analysts have had positive official ratings on MSFT for what seems like forever, so rating changes may be in the form of estimates and price target revisions if the Street follows suit.</p>
<p>MSFT is trading up 0.75% at $26.53 pre-market on almost 700,000 shares; and that is after the stock closed up $0.35 at $26.33 yesterday on 74 million shares.</p>
<p>John C. Ogg is a partner at financial blog <a href="http://247wallst.blogspot.com/">24/7 Wall St</a>.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/15/goldman-raises-microsoft-target-to-33/">Goldman raises Microsoft target to $33</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 15 Sep 2006 09:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/15/goldman-raises-microsoft-target-to-33/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/669532/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/15/goldman-raises-microsoft-target-to-33/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>price target</category><category>PriceTarget</category><category>Rick Sherlund</category><category>RickSherlund</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 09:38:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[eBay after the bell 6-16-06: more trouble in China]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/16/ebay-after-the-bell-6-16-06-more-trouble-in-china/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/16/ebay-after-the-bell-6-16-06-more-trouble-in-china/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/16/ebay-after-the-bell-6-16-06-more-trouble-in-china/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a></p><img id="vimage_1" alt="ebay 3-month stock chart 06-16-06" hspace="4" src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/06/ebay_chart_06162006.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Despite good news from Wall Street analysts today: Rochdale Securities upgraded eBay to buy from hold with a $35 target price, and RBC initiated coverage at hold, with the same price target, eBay slipped nearly 1.5% today to close at $30.28.<br /><br />Concerns are mounting among investors especially after a local research firm in Taipei released its data.&nbsp; The analyst claims eBay has been losing ground in China to one of its competitors, especially in the C2C (consumer to consumer) sales.<br /><br />Somewhat different were the words of Martin Wu, chief executive at eBay China.&nbsp; He claimed only a few weeks ago that revenue increased more than 10 per cent in the first quarter and that revenue of its competitor Taobao, remained unchanged.<br /><br />The attempt to consolidate the difference between the analyst's data and the chairman data were unfruitful.<br />
<p>eBay was the leader in the Chinese auction market but in January had to drop transaction fees from basic C2C services.&nbsp; This is due to the introduction of a free auction service by rival Taobao in 2004 that caused a massive flight of consumers in its direction.<br /></p>
<p>But have no fear, Forbes has just published an article saying that <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2006/06/16/bird-flu-h5n1-in_kr_0616soapbox_inl.html?partner=yahootix">in the event of a bird flu pandemic, eBay should do well</a>.&nbsp; Here's something to hope for.<br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/16/ebay-after-the-bell-6-16-06-more-trouble-in-china/">eBay after the bell 6-16-06: more trouble in China</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 16 Jun 2006 17:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2158460/ebay-wins-china-auctions>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/16/ebay-after-the-bell-6-16-06-more-trouble-in-china/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/634180/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/16/ebay-after-the-bell-6-16-06-more-trouble-in-china/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>$35</category><category>analyst</category><category>analyst upgrade</category><category>AnalystUpgrade</category><category>ebay</category><category>ebay upgrade</category><category>EbayUpgrade</category><category>price target</category><category>PriceTarget</category><category>rbc</category><category>rbc analyst</category><category>RbcAnalyst</category><category>rochdale</category><category>rochdale securities</category><category>RochdaleSecurities</category><category>upgrade</category><category>wall street</category><category>wall street analyst</category><category>WallStreet</category><category>WallStreetAnalyst</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 17:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Merrill Lynch lowers price targets for eBay, Google]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/31/merrill-lynch-lowers-price-targets-for-ebay-google/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/31/merrill-lynch-lowers-price-targets-for-ebay-google/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/31/merrill-lynch-lowers-price-targets-for-ebay-google/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a></p><p>Guess it is about time that Merrill Lynch realized that its price targets for some Internet stocks&nbsp;were a bit too lofty (is the legacy of Henry Blodget still alive and well at that firm?).</p>
<p>Today&nbsp;Merrill lowered targets&nbsp;for both eBay and Google -- keeping an "attractive" recommendation on both stocks -- but admitting that its estimate for how much investors would be willing to pay was too high. In Wall&nbsp; Street parlance, the&nbsp;reassessment was&nbsp;"due to lower multiple assumptions" as <a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com">Theflyonthewall.com</a>&nbsp; reports (subscription required).</p>
<p>Now, try not to laugh. But here's the change in price targets:</p>
<p>eBay, now trading at $33, was lowered to $44 from $51. The firm sees the new deal with Yahoo as a potential catalyst. It will need a catalyst to get to $44 from here.</p>
<p>Google, now trading at $373, was lowered from $540 to $490. Still an ambitious target. </p>
<p>Seems to me like Merrill is still feeling quite optimistic.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/31/merrill-lynch-lowers-price-targets-for-ebay-google/">Merrill Lynch lowers price targets for eBay, Google</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 31 May 2006 10:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/31/merrill-lynch-lowers-price-targets-for-ebay-google/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/623510/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/31/merrill-lynch-lowers-price-targets-for-ebay-google/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ebay</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>Merrill Lynch</category><category>MerrillLynch</category><category>price target</category><category>PriceTarget</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Amey Stone]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 10:05:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
