Publishing posts
FeedPosted Jul 26th 2010 5:30PM by Steven Mallas (RSS feed)
Filed under: Earnings Reports

Pearson PLC (
PSO), a publisher of educational materials and financial information, received a nice bid today following the release of some earnings data. At the time of this writing, the stock was higher by nearly 6% to a quote of $15.98. The shares had reached a price of $16.02 earlier in the day, which isn't at all far off from the 52-week high of $16.37. Cool to see an equity near the 52-week high, right?
The
one-year chart shows how the stock has recovered after its recent pullback. Will it continue to climb in an upward direction?
Continue reading Pearson Up on Earnings News
Posted Jun 30th 2010 9:30AM by Steven Mallas (RSS feed)
Filed under: Magazines
Playboy (PLA) is a fascinating stock. As with every trade, there are two sides to the story. One side will argue that the stock has bounced nicely off the 52-week low of $2.30, and that it has room to run as the concern continues to alter its model for making money. At some point, the bull might say, the market will become excited and buy the shares.
Interesting thesis. My argument against speculating with this idea is simple: it's Playboy. You might do well; you might not. I don't know how much plainer it can be.
Continue reading Playboy: Still a Risk
Posted Mar 19th 2010 12:10PM by Tom Johansmeyer (RSS feed)
Filed under: Competitive Strategy, Media World
Now if you blame the media, someone else will have to share in the losses.
Insurance company Aviva (AV) is taking the side of camera-wielding, microphone-thrusting pushy press folks with a new form of protection that will cover everything from electronics to foot-in-mouth syndrome (i.e., liability). The insurance product will be available to a variety of companies, including both online and print publishers, broadcasters, photographers and marketing and advertising companies. So, if you're responsible for the news, the ads or the process of putting them in front of eyeballs, Aviva probably has you in mind.
Continue reading New Insurance Product Protects Media
Posted Feb 18th 2010 5:20PM by Steven Mallas (RSS feed)
Filed under: Earnings Reports, Magazines, Media World
Playboy Enterprises, Inc. (PLA) published its quarterly numbers today, and while there were some positive developments, overall, I think it's safe to say that the stock is a risk that should be avoided. Unless, of course, you simply want to roll the dice and speculate.
Hey, nothing wrong with having a little fun, I suppose, although there surely are more attractive speculative bets out there. According to , Playboy lost 83 cents per share in Q4. Last year at this time, there was a loss of $4.40 per share.
Continue reading Playboy Still Not Pretty Enough for My Portfolio
Posted Sep 25th 2009 3:00PM by Steven Mallas (RSS feed)
Filed under: Earnings Reports, McGraw-Hill Companies (MHP), Media World
Scholastic (NASDAQ: SCHL), the publisher of the Harry Potter books, issued its first-quarter numbers on Thursday. Although things do seem to be improving, I can't say I was wholly enchanted by the data.
Net sales from continuing operations rose 14%. Okay, that's a good start. Double-digit rises are always respectable. But then we get to the bottom line. Scholastic, which is a related business to McGraw-Hill (NYSE: MHP), lost 68 cents per share from continuing operations. Now, sure, the loss was considerably less severe than the year-ago black ink of $1.13 per share. But I always get nervous when I read about losses. Can't help it.
Continue reading Scholastic's Q1 doesn't cast magic spell -- or does it?
Posted Aug 5th 2009 1:30PM by Steven Mallas (RSS feed)
Filed under: Earnings Reports, Magazines
Playboy Enterprises (NYSE: PLA) is still around? I was surprised to hear that it was, according to a news article from Reuters detailing the struggling media company's second-quarter results. Unfortunately, Playboy remains a puzzle. How in the world is management going to turn the ship around?
Playboy's top line fell by 15%. The bottom line booked a loss of 26 cents per share. Expectations were for 23 cents per share to be lost. In the year-ago period, Playboy lost 10 cents per share. I think it's plainly obvious that Playboy just isn't the force it once was. Pretty sad to see this icon slowly fade into irrelevance as the digital revolution continues to devalue its historic brand equity.
Continue reading Playboy's second quarter: Not centerfold material
Posted May 11th 2009 3:10PM by Steven Mallas (RSS feed)
Filed under: Earnings Reports
Playboy (NYSE:
PLA) published its
Q1 results today. Any longtime follower of the company will note that things haven't changed. We're still talking about revenue declines and losses. When will the Bunny finally hop back into reliable profitability? No one really knows when (if) that will happen.
On a reported basis, Playboy said it lost $0.41 per share. If you strip out charges, you get a loss of $0.15 per share. This number was a few cents better than the expectations of analysts according to this source. Be that as it may, they certainly don't meet my expectations. The adjusted loss is essentially the same as last year's number. I suppose we have to give the interim CEO Jerome Kern a chance. As you'll recall, Christie Hefner finally gave up her throne earlier in the year (thankfully).
Continue reading Playboy's Q1 needs to be airbrushed
Posted Feb 19th 2009 4:35PM by Bruce Watson (RSS feed)
Filed under: Amazon.com (AMZN)

It can be hard to tell the difference between a revolution and a fad, or a game-changing innovation and the latest toy. With that in mind, it isn't surprising that so many people have failed to recognize
Amazon's (NASDAQ:
AMZN) Kindle for what it truly is: the first bold step in what will likely become the salvation of publishing.
Frankly, it's easy to overlook the Kindle. At more than $300, it is prohibitively
expensive for many consumers in today's market; further, as
Bloggingstocks columnist Joseph Lazzaro
notes, there is nothing quite like curling up with a nice book, and the current Kindle doesn't quite make the grade. The little reader suffers from a too-small screen, a too-high price tag, and is an insufficient translator of the holistic "reading experience" that true bibliophiles adore.
Continue reading Long term investments: The (bright) future of publishing
Next Page >