<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Pimco's Gross: Ratings Agencies Lack Common Sense]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/05/pimco-s-gross-ratings-agencies-lack-common-sense/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/05/pimco-s-gross-ratings-agencies-lack-common-sense/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/05/pimco-s-gross-ratings-agencies-lack-common-sense/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/pimco-logo.jpg" />One of the world's premiere bond fund managers is recommending that investors view credit ratings issued by ratings agencies with a critical and skeptical eye.<br />
<br />
Pimco's Bill Gross, in a commentary published <a href="http://www.pimco.com/LeftNav/Featured+Market+Commentary/IO/2010/Lovin+Spoonful+-+May+2010+IO.htm">on Pimco's website</a>, said ratings agencies are necessary, but their services are overpriced and their evaluations are subject to the influence of the issuer, "which in turn muddles their minds and clouds their judgment to say the least."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/05/pimco-s-gross-ratings-agencies-lack-common-sense/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Pimco's Gross: Ratings Agencies Lack Common Sense</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/05/pimco-s-gross-ratings-agencies-lack-common-sense/">Pimco's Gross: Ratings Agencies Lack Common Sense</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 05 May 2010 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/05/pimco-s-gross-ratings-agencies-lack-common-sense/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19466009/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/05/pimco-s-gross-ratings-agencies-lack-common-sense/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bill Gross</category><category>bonds</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Pimco</category><category>ratings</category><category>ratings agencies</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Insurance Company Upgrades Beat Downgrades by 50% in 2009]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/22/insurance-company-upgrades-beat-downgrades-by-50-in-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/22/insurance-company-upgrades-beat-downgrades-by-50-in-2009/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/22/insurance-company-upgrades-beat-downgrades-by-50-in-2009/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a></p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Insurance/"><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/car-crash-at244-by-thomas-frederick.jpg"  alt="" />Insurance</a> company upgrades outpaced downgrades by 50% last year. <a href="http://www.businessinsurance.com/article/20100219/NEWS/100219909" target="_blank">In a report by insurance rating agency A.M. Best</a>, <em>Upgrades, Downgrades Moved at a Similar Pace in 2009</em>, 36 commercial property/casualty insurers were upgraded, compared to 24 that saw their ratings head in the opposite direction. <br />
<br />
According to the report, "By demonstrating consistently strong operating results over several years and maintaining sound underwriting discipline, conservative reserving practices and leading business positions in certain segments of the commercial market, these insurers have been able to strengthen their risk-adjusted capitalization."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/22/insurance-company-upgrades-beat-downgrades-by-50-in-2009/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Insurance Company Upgrades Beat Downgrades by 50% in 2009</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/22/insurance-company-upgrades-beat-downgrades-by-50-in-2009/">Insurance Company Upgrades Beat Downgrades by 50% in 2009</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessinsurance.com/article/20100219/NEWS/100219909>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/22/insurance-company-upgrades-beat-downgrades-by-50-in-2009/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19367634/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/22/insurance-company-upgrades-beat-downgrades-by-50-in-2009/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AIG</category><category>am best</category><category>AmBest</category><category>american international group</category><category>AmericanInternationalGroup</category><category>insurance industry</category><category>insurance stocks</category><category>InsuranceCompanies</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Munich Re</category><category>MunichRe</category><category>RatingAgencies</category><category>ratings</category><category>ratings agencies</category><category>RatingsAgencies</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Moody's downgrades Sony]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/27/moodys-downgrades-sony/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/27/moodys-downgrades-sony/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/27/moodys-downgrades-sony/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/sne-sony-logo.jpg" />Moody's cut <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys" target="_blank">Sony Corp.</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys" target="_blank">SNE</a>) long-term ratings from A2 to A3 today. <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssConsumerGoodsAndRetailNews/idUST28190220090527?sp=true" target="_blank">Slowing growth, price declines, and a strong yen</a> were given as the reasons.</p>
<p>The company expects a second consecutive year of losses and is getting ready to kick off a restructuring plan. Nonetheless, the credit rating agency doesn't expect the Japanese electronics firm to overcome the effects of the global financial crisis -- especially for high-end, high-margin products.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/27/moodys-downgrades-sony/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Moody's downgrades Sony</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/27/moodys-downgrades-sony/">Moody's downgrades Sony</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 27 May 2009 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/27/moodys-downgrades-sony/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19048965/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/27/moodys-downgrades-sony/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analyst</category><category>analyst downgrade</category><category>credit rating</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jpm</category><category>jpmorgan</category><category>jpmorgan chase</category><category>moodys</category><category>nec</category><category>rating</category><category>rating change</category><category>ratings</category><category>sne</category><category>sony</category><category>toshiba</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sirius XM Radio gets an upgrade from S&amp;P -- surely you can't be serious]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/15/sirius-xm-radio-gets-an-upgrade-from-sandp-surely-you-cant-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/15/sirius-xm-radio-gets-an-upgrade-from-sandp-surely-you-cant-be/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/15/sirius-xm-radio-gets-an-upgrade-from-sandp-surely-you-cant-be/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/siri/" rel="tag">Sirius Satellite Radio (SIRI)</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/sirius-xm.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sirius-xm-radio-inc/siri/nas">Sirius XM Radio</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sirius-xm-radio-inc/siri/nas">SIRI</a>) may get a bit of a lift this morning, as the company's <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/ap/_a/sandp-bumps-up-rating-on-sirius-xm/rfid203995549?channel=pf">corporate credit rating was raised</a> by Standard &amp; Poor's (S&amp;P). The ratings agency upped SIRI's rating to "CCC+" from "CCC" and raised the issue-level ratings a notch. That said, S&amp;P did keep SIRI's senior unsecured notes at "CCC-." <br /><br />S&amp;P analyst Hal Diamond attributed the move to "increased comfort with the company's near-term liquidity needs," following a loan from Liberty Media. Liberty loaned SIRI money in exchange for preferred stock, which is convertible into 40% of SIRI's common shares. This investment pushed significant debt maturities from 2009 to 2011.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/15/sirius-xm-radio-gets-an-upgrade-from-sandp-surely-you-cant-be/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Sirius XM Radio gets an upgrade from S&amp;P -- surely you can't be serious</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/15/sirius-xm-radio-gets-an-upgrade-from-sandp-surely-you-cant-be/">Sirius XM Radio gets an upgrade from S&amp;P -- surely you can't be serious</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/15/sirius-xm-radio-gets-an-upgrade-from-sandp-surely-you-cant-be/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1517703/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/15/sirius-xm-radio-gets-an-upgrade-from-sandp-surely-you-cant-be/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>Liberty Media</category><category>LibertyMedia</category><category>penny stocks</category><category>PennyStocks</category><category>ratings</category><category>siri</category><category>standard poors</category><category>StandardPoors</category><category>takeover stocks</category><category>TakeoverStocks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Motorola cut to junk by Standard and Poor's]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/07/motorola-cut-to-junk-by-standard-and-poors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/07/motorola-cut-to-junk-by-standard-and-poors/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/07/motorola-cut-to-junk-by-standard-and-poors/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mot/" rel="tag">Motorola (MOT)</a></p><p><img height="143" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/motorola-hei2a.gif" width="206" align="right" vspace="4" />Standard &amp; Poor's has slashed <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/motorola-inc/mot/nys">Motorola Inc.</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/motorola-inc/mot/nys">MOT</a>) credit rating to <a href="http://infotech.indiatimes.com/News/Motorola_gets_junk_rating_from_SP/articleshow/3800479.cms">junk status</a>, saying that continued operational challenges will lead to weak cash flows.</p>
<p>"Revenues and profits in the first part of the year will be challenged by a narrower, somewhat-dated product portfolio," S&amp;P's Bruce Hyman <a href="http://infotech.indiatimes.com/News/Motorola_gets_junk_rating_from_SP/articleshow/3800479.cms">said in a statement</a>. "Standard &amp; Poor's also expects about 10 percent fewer handsets to be sold worldwide in 2009 at lower average prices than in 2008."</p>
<p>On December 1, BloggingStocks' <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/01/motorolas-mot-fate-looks-worse-as-rivals-falter/">Doug McIntyre wrote</a> that "As hard as it would have been to imagine a year ago, Motorola may still have to dump its cell operation and perhaps put it into Chapter 11. Its fate is that grim. It needs to escape its employee and creditor obligations to make it."</p>
<p>The company's November 2012 notes are trading at a yield of 8.02% -- hardly a sign of a company in severe distress.</p>
<p>But everything the company needs to do to turn itself around will be made more difficult by a weak credit rating in an environment where it's tough for company's with good credit ratings to secure access to capital.</p>
<p>But the one thing we can see from this is that <a href="http://ibs.smartmoney.com/Investing/Stocks/Icahns-Board-Bid-Rings-Motorola-Shares-20717/">Carl Icahn's complaint</a> that the company was under-leveraged may not have been the case.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/07/motorola-cut-to-junk-by-standard-and-poors/">Motorola cut to junk by Standard and Poor's</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 07 Dec 2008 11:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://infotech.indiatimes.com/News/Motorola_gets_junk_rating_from_SP/articleshow/3800479.cms>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/07/motorola-cut-to-junk-by-standard-and-poors/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1393286/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/07/motorola-cut-to-junk-by-standard-and-poors/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bruce Hyman</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Junk</category><category>MOT</category><category>Motorola</category><category>Ratings</category><category>Standard and Poors</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 11:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[EMC Corporation plunges into single-digit territory]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/10/emc-corporation-plunges-into-single-digit-territory/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/10/emc-corporation-plunges-into-single-digit-territory/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/10/emc-corporation-plunges-into-single-digit-territory/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/emc/" rel="tag">EMC Corp (EMC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p>As U.S. stocks continue to struggle under seemingly unrelenting selling pressure, tech-sector heavyweight <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/emc-corporation-mass/emc/nys">EMC Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/emc-corporation-mass/emc/nys">EMC</a>) plunged today into single-digit territory for the first time in more than two years. In fact, EMC earlier fell to $9.35, its lowest price since August 2004. However, today's losses are simply an extension of the stock's long-term trend -- EMC has steadily declined since November 2007 under pressure from its 10-month and 20-month moving averages.</p>
<p>The drop into single digits is troubling for EMC, since the round-number $10 region has provided support for the shares for more than 5 years. The stock hasn't closed a single month below this area since April 2003, and it's only made a few short-lived forays below double-digit territory in the intervening months. In fact, prior to today, the equity's annual low stood at $10.10.</p>
<p>EMC pared its losses by the close and settled today 3% lower at $10.12, but the stock isn't out of the woods yet. The multi-year low tagged earlier could prompt some analysts to reevaluate their bullish stance on this once-strong performer. According to Zacks, EMC has garnered 12 Strong Buys, 4 Buys, and 5 Holds, with absolutely no Sell or Strong Sell ratings to be found. This top-heavy configuration leaves the sliding stock highly vulnerable to downgrades or other bearish notes. Any negative commentary from the pros on Wall Street could force EMC to revisit that rarely explored territory south of $10.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><em>Elizabeth Harrow is an analyst and financial writer in the research department at <a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/">Schaeffer's Investment Research</a>. She is featured in the video series <a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/commentary/podcasts/videocenter.aspx">Schaeffer's Daily Q&amp;A</a> on SchaeffersResearch.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/10/emc-corporation-plunges-into-single-digit-territory/">EMC Corporation plunges into single-digit territory</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/10/emc-corporation-plunges-into-single-digit-territory/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1338978/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/10/emc-corporation-plunges-into-single-digit-territory/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analysts</category><category>downgrades</category><category>EMC</category><category>emc corporation</category><category>EmcCorporation</category><category>ratings</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>TechnicalAnalysis</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ambac Financial and MBIA Inc. plunge on Moody's downgrade warning]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/19/ambac-financial-and-mbia-inc-plunge-on-moodys-downgrade-warnin/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/19/ambac-financial-and-mbia-inc-plunge-on-moodys-downgrade-warnin/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/19/ambac-financial-and-mbia-inc-plunge-on-moodys-downgrade-warnin/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mbi/" rel="tag">MBIA Inc (MBI)</a></p><p>Thanks to a downgrade warning from Moody's, bond insurers <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ambac-financial-group-inc/abk/nys">Ambac Financial Group</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ambac-financial-group-inc/abk/nys">ABK</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mbia-inc/mbi/nys">MBIA Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mbia-inc/mbi/nys">MBI</a>) are sitting out today's massive rally in financial stocks. Late Thursday, Moody's announced that it may downgrade the duo's ratings by more than one notch due to rising losses from subprime mortgage debt. So far today, the news has prompted a 7% drop in MBIA shares, and a slump of nearly 8% for Ambac.</p>
<p>In a statement, Moody's said, "Because both Ambac and MBIA are meaningfully exposed to the risk of U.S. subprime mortgages and other residential mortgage products, the revised assumptions are expected to have a significant impact on the firms' capital positions and multi-notch downgrades are possible." Specifically, the <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/ap/_a/moodys-puts-mbia-units-ratings-under/rfid141309732">"A2"</a> insurance financial strength rating of MBIA's insurance unit is under review, as is the <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/ap/_a/moodys-places-ambac-ratings-under-review/rfid141308787">"Aa3"</a> insurance financial strength rating for Ambac.</p>
<p>Neither bond insurer seems particularly pleased by Moody's decision. Jay Brown, chairman and CEO of MBIA, said that the review reflects "inherent flaws" in the ratings company's logic, and added that his company has a capital cushion of more than $3 billion. Ambac's chairman and chief executive, Michael Callen, noted his "surprise and disappointment" at the news, and added that "Moody's ratings actions continue to cause confusion, uncertainty and the risk of material economic damange if their assumptions ultimately prove to be too onerous."</p>
<p>Despite today's plunge, MBI and ABK remain poised atop support from their respective 10-week moving averages. Both bond insurers have endured massive price plunges amid subprime-related fallout, but they've recently rebounded. Ambac now boasts a 60-day relative-strength reading of 381% versus the S&amp;P 500 Index, while MBIA's is 312%.</p>
<p><em>Elizabeth Harrow is an analyst and financial writer in the research department at <a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/">Schaeffer's Investment Research</a>. She is featured in the video series <a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/commentary/podcasts/videocenter.aspx">Schaeffer's Daily Q&amp;A</a> on SchaeffersResearch.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/19/ambac-financial-and-mbia-inc-plunge-on-moodys-downgrade-warnin/">Ambac Financial and MBIA Inc. plunge on Moody's downgrade warning</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 19 Sep 2008 12:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/19/ambac-financial-and-mbia-inc-plunge-on-moodys-downgrade-warnin/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1318871/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/19/ambac-financial-and-mbia-inc-plunge-on-moodys-downgrade-warnin/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ABK</category><category>Ambac Financial Group</category><category>AmbacFinancialGroup</category><category>bond insurers</category><category>BondInsurers</category><category>downgrade</category><category>inthenews</category><category>MBI</category><category>MBIA Inc.</category><category>MbiaInc.</category><category>Moodys</category><category>ratings</category><category>subprime</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 12:58:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New ratings system for Moody's (MCO) is cover-up of past errors]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/new-ratings-system-for-moodys-mco-is-cover-up-of-past-errors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/new-ratings-system-for-moodys-mco-is-cover-up-of-past-errors/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/new-ratings-system-for-moodys-mco-is-cover-up-of-past-errors/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/moody-s-corporation/mco/nys"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/wstreet.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Moody's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/moody-s-corporation/mco/nys">MCO</a>) is thinking of releasing a new ratings system that does not use letters, but has numeric ratings and "warning labels" for securities that may be difficult to analyze.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120215330254641705.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news">According to</a> <em>The Wall Street Journal,</em> "one of the most significant changes being considered by the parent of Moody's Investors Service: a new, 21-point numerical scale to rate structured securities." The new system would also help investors look at CDOs and other risky investments differently from corporate bonds.</p>
<p>The whole exercise is bogus. Moody's could have employed a similar system long ago. Why are numbered ratings any different from those that use letters? Why didn't the firm have a systems that indicated the risks in complex securities such as CDOs and other structured investments? </p>
<p>The Moody's move is simply an attempt to try to hide and rectify the substantial flaws in the system that exists now. And, it is a feeble attempt to boot.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com</em><em>. </em></p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/new-ratings-system-for-moodys-mco-is-cover-up-of-past-errors/">New ratings system for Moody's (MCO) is cover-up of past errors</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120215330254641705.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/new-ratings-system-for-moodys-mco-is-cover-up-of-past-errors/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1106890/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/new-ratings-system-for-moodys-mco-is-cover-up-of-past-errors/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CDOs</category><category>colllaterialized debt obligations</category><category>ColllaterializedDebtObligations</category><category>credit crunch</category><category>CreditCrunch</category><category>inthenews</category><category>MCO</category><category>Moody's</category><category>ratings</category><category>ratings agencies</category><category>RatingsAgencies</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 08:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Do Moody's and S&amp;P have any credibility left?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/26/do-moodys-and-sandp-have-any-credibility-left/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/26/do-moodys-and-sandp-have-any-credibility-left/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/26/do-moodys-and-sandp-have-any-credibility-left/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p>A <a href="http://online.barrons.com/article_print/SB119809206941640049.html">piece in Barron's</a> (subscription required) looks the massive failure of ratings agencies Standard and Poor's, which is part of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcgraw-hill-companies-incorporat/mhp/nys">McGraw-Hill</a>, (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcgraw-hill-companies-incorporat/mhp/nys">MHP</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/moody-s-corporation/mco/nys">Moody's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/moody-s-corporation/mco/nys">MCO</a>) that led to extremely rapid downgrades of subprime debt and the CDOs that held it, wreaking havoc in the marketplace.</p>
<p>Congress and pretty much everyone else is investigating and according to Barron's, "Moody's and Standard &amp; Poor's have held far too strong a grip on the industry for anyone's good. It is high time for a change." The magazine writes about the inordinate power that the 2 firms have, and suggests reforms, including breaking up the "partner monopoly" that has given the agencies such great returns.</p>
<p>With their credibility at an all-time low, Moody's and S&amp;P are very vulnerable to increased regulation -- and with good reason. The lush returns Moody's boasts could be coming to an end.</p>
<p>The stock has justifiably pulled back but, with a valuation still near $10 billion, there could be a lot farther to fall. This is all a mess that Jim Chanos predicted this mess, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/15/scandal-develops-around-rating-agencies-time-to-short/">saying</a> that Moody's is "no longer a referee on the playing field, they are actually playing at this point. So although they are wearing an umpire's outfit, they have a Yankees hat on and I think that's the real problem, in that they are so entwined in the structured finance business."</p>
<p>Moody's brand is probably irreparably harmed, and reforms could cut into the company's moat big time. The days of Moody's as a great short opportunity might be over, but this is still a stock to stay away from.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/26/do-moodys-and-sandp-have-any-credibility-left/">Do Moody's and S&amp;P have any credibility left?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 26 Dec 2007 16:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.barrons.com/article/SB119809209608040063.html?mod=article-outset-box>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/26/do-moodys-and-sandp-have-any-credibility-left/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1070783/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/26/do-moodys-and-sandp-have-any-credibility-left/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>MCO</category><category>Moody's</category><category>ratings</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 16:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CBS bomb 'Viva Laughlin' canceled after 2 episodes -- what's next?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/cbs-bomb-viva-laughlin-cancelled-after-2-episodes-whats-n/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/cbs-bomb-viva-laughlin-cancelled-after-2-episodes-whats-n/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/cbs-bomb-viva-laughlin-cancelled-after-2-episodes-whats-n/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a></p><img width="120" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="167" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/viva-2.jpg" alt="" />Did these fools learn nothing from <span style="font-style: italic;">Cop Rock</span>? <span style="font-style: italic;">Viva Laughlin</span>,<em> </em>the universally panned musical/mystery/drama/casino-intrigue series <a href="http://www.variety.com/VR1117974484.html" target="_blank">has been canceled</a> after just two airings. What's worse, the show has been pulled after just one try in its regular Sunday-night time slot. <br /><br />While the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CBS Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CBS</a>) show was rife with talent, including star Melanie Griffith and executive producer/star Hugh Jackman, it suffered from pitifully low ratings and even worse reviews. On Sunday, the program scored a 1.2 rating and a 3 share among adults 18-49. Last Thursday's premiere, helped by a <em>CSI </em>lead-in, turned in ratings that were also disappointing. The show was based on a successful BBC series, <em>Viva Blackpool. </em>This strategy has certainly been hit (<span style="font-style: italic;">The Office</span>) and miss (<span style="font-style: italic;">Coupling</span>) when it comes to stateside programming. <br /><br />Filling the Sunday 8 p.m. time slot will be reruns of <span style="font-style: italic;">CSI</span> until the new season of Emmy-winning reality show <span style="font-style: italic;">The Amazing Race</span><em> </em>begins November 4.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/cbs-bomb-viva-laughlin-cancelled-after-2-episodes-whats-n/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>CBS bomb 'Viva Laughlin' canceled after 2 episodes -- what's next?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/cbs-bomb-viva-laughlin-cancelled-after-2-episodes-whats-n/">CBS bomb 'Viva Laughlin' canceled after 2 episodes -- what's next?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.variety.com/VR1117974484.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/cbs-bomb-viva-laughlin-cancelled-after-2-episodes-whats-n/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1019251/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/cbs-bomb-viva-laughlin-cancelled-after-2-episodes-whats-n/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ABC</category><category>Amazing Race</category><category>AmazingRace</category><category>cancellation</category><category>CBS</category><category>CSi</category><category>DIS</category><category>fall season</category><category>FallSeason</category><category>ratings</category><category>television</category><category>viva laughlin</category><category>VivaLaughlin</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[ABC bests NBC in latest Nightly News ratings]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/abc-bests-nbc-in-latest-nightly-news-ratings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/abc-bests-nbc-in-latest-nightly-news-ratings/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/abc-bests-nbc-in-latest-nightly-news-ratings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a></p>The viewership of the evening news among <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs/nys">CBS Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs/nys">CBS</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ge/nys">General Electric Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ge/nys">GE</a>)'s NBC and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dis/nys">The Walt Disney Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dis/nys">DIS</a>)'s ABC has always been a dogfight. Each competitor tries to add more value and one-up the next guy (or gal) with flashy anchors, exclusive stories, or engaging content. It's a death match, and it always has been. In an age of instant news viewed through the Internet, though, the jobs of all three are increasingly becoming harder. That is, grabbing new viewers won't be getting any easier soon as a generation of news hounders who live on the web shun television and the associated glitz for the instant gratification of news fixes, even on their cellphone screens.<br /><br />But, that is not stopping the news networks from still obsessively worrying about which one has the <a href="http://tvdecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/09/25/abc-narrowly-bests-nbc-in-evening-news-ratings/">highest viewership in the U.S.</a> As reported recently, NBC's decade-long dominance in the evening news segment has seen a recent upstart surge from ABC World News Tonight, anchored by Charles Gibson. Bryan Williams, who replaced NBC vet Tom Brokaw just recently, probably isn't worried that much for now. But Gibson has been around for a long time at ABC, and he's a familiar face to millions. So is Williams, but he may not have the viewer-gaining power that Gibson is most likely enjoying at the moment.<br /><br />Which network will end 2007 with more documented viewers? That can't be called right now, but with advertisers becoming more protective of their ad money (and shifting more onto the internet), the battle for ratings has never been more important than it is now. Media distribution is changing rapidly, and only the last success is the best form of present success. So far, the 25 to 54 demographic, which is the top prize among advertisers, watched ABC's nightly news broadcast more than NBC's nightly program <a href="http://tvdecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/09/25/abc-narrowly-bests-nbc-in-evening-news-ratings/">for the first time in 11 years</a> recently. If this is a sign of things to come, it'll be a dogfight once again.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/abc-bests-nbc-in-latest-nightly-news-ratings/">ABC bests NBC in latest Nightly News ratings</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 26 Sep 2007 18:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://tvdecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/09/25/abc-narrowly-bests-nbc-in-evening-news-ratings/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/abc-bests-nbc-in-latest-nightly-news-ratings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/998605/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/abc-bests-nbc-in-latest-nightly-news-ratings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ABC</category><category>inthenews</category><category>NBC</category><category>Prime time</category><category>PrimeTime</category><category>ratings</category><category>sweeps</category><category>television</category><category>week</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 18:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dear Jim Cramer: Why we don't like you]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/31/why-jim-cramer-can-just-cry-me-a-river/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/31/why-jim-cramer-can-just-cry-me-a-river/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/31/why-jim-cramer-can-just-cry-me-a-river/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a></p><p>I was invited to comment on an <a href="http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/05/29/why-people-hate-and-love-jim-cramer/">article in the New York Times</a> about Jim Cramer and his apparent inability to fully grasp why so many of us don't like him. The piece serves to give grand exposure to one of the main reasons that <em>I myself don't like him. </em>Come with me now on a short tour of words.</p>
<p>The first word I'd like to address is "torpedo". That is the word which Cramer used to define wealth building as a hedge fund manager. It works like this: Find a stock which is heavily overweight with little support, and sell it short. Organize you buddies to your way of thinking, then short more shares to send the longs scampering. Then move in your bears and suck up your bets.</p>
<p>Next, let's move to Jim's claim that his television show has, "allowed me to express my innate insanity, in all its glory, to everyone who might be interested." That's a fine statement for any individual who is willing to stand by it but Cramer also stated, "there seems to be a market for this kind of idiocy." So he flaunts his ability to act like a goon but then comes back to indicate that it really does go against his grain.</p>
<p>Then the man issues a statement as poignant as, "I remain completely and utterly repulsive to myself... I'm an arrogant jerk." Be that as it may, someone really should send that man for some counseling. If I'm not mistaken, that statement (or something similar) is warned about within the first three chapters of the psychology text book <u>How To Recognize Suicide Bait</u> . Add an additional quip such as "I wake up in a pool of self-loathing", and we have reason to remove the garage door and to take all sharp objects from the house. If I recall my law enforcement schooling, isn't "self loathing" that stuff they make serial killers out of?</p>
<p>Now if Cramer was to read this, and I'm near certain he won't, he'd probably come up with some meandering explanation that I've taken his statements out of context and that his words weren't meant as literal. Therein lies the single biggest reason why I cannot stand Jim Cramer. He has proven to me in plain fact and by his own text that you simply cannot trust one word that comes out of his mouth. Yeah, he's rich all right, but at what cost?</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/31/why-jim-cramer-can-just-cry-me-a-river/">Dear Jim Cramer: Why we don't like you</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 31 May 2007 10:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/31/why-jim-cramer-can-just-cry-me-a-river/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/907530/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/31/why-jim-cramer-can-just-cry-me-a-river/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bear raiding</category><category>BearRaiding</category><category>GE</category><category>hedge fund</category><category>HedgeFund</category><category>insanity</category><category>Jim Cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>Mad Money</category><category>MadMoney</category><category>NBC</category><category>ratings</category><category>self loathing</category><category>SelfLoathing</category><category>short sell</category><category>ShortSell</category><category>suicide</category><category>torpedo</category><category>yeah, that's the ticket</category><category>Yeah,That'sTheTicket</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 10:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nielsen to expand ratings coverage outside of the home]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/15/nielsen-to-expand-ratings-coverage-outside-of-the-home/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/15/nielsen-to-expand-ratings-coverage-outside-of-the-home/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/15/nielsen-to-expand-ratings-coverage-outside-of-the-home/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a></p><p><img height="173" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/04/trackside-sports-bar.jpg" width="220" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />For the first time, Nielsen will be offering data on what people watch on television outside of their homes. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/13/business/media/13adco.html?_r=1&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;ref=business&amp;adxnnlx=1176534638-wwcQrZ+cpZ8V6cGWiHQlLg">According to the <em>New York Times</em></a>:</p>
<p><em>Beginning in September, Nielsen will release national ratings for TV viewing away from home in places like bars, hotels, gyms and offices. For decades, Nielsen has rated television viewing based on what viewers in its panel watch while at home. The moment those viewers traveled or went to the gym, any television they watched was not recorded.</em></p>
<p>This is good news for networks like ESPN, the leading provider of sports coverage, because sports are so commonly seen in bars and restaurants. Advertising rates are set based on Nielsen ratings, and sports coverage could see a pretty significant lift. </p>
<p>What might be most interesting is the way that Nielsen is tracking viewing in hotels and restaurants: They are providing cell phone tracking devices to 4,700 participants to take with them wherever they go. The devices can recognize what is on the television by sound. Pretty cool, huh?</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/15/nielsen-to-expand-ratings-coverage-outside-of-the-home/">Nielsen to expand ratings coverage outside of the home</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 15 Apr 2007 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/15/nielsen-to-expand-ratings-coverage-outside-of-the-home/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/874195/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/15/nielsen-to-expand-ratings-coverage-outside-of-the-home/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advertising rates</category><category>espn</category><category>Nielsen</category><category>Ratings</category><category>sports coverage</category><category>Television</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Malakar and Stern stir up a ratings tornado]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/31/malakar-and-stern-stir-up-a-ratings-tornado/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/31/malakar-and-stern-stir-up-a-ratings-tornado/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/31/malakar-and-stern-stir-up-a-ratings-tornado/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/siri/" rel="tag">Sirius Satellite Radio (SIRI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><p><img width="95" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="123" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/03/howard-stern.jpg" alt="" style="width: 95px; height: 123px;" />Sanjaya Malakar and Howard Stern are smack dab in the middle of a high-stakes battle for America's attention. </p>
<p>According to <em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/31/arts/television/31idol.html?_r=1&amp;8dpc&amp;oref=slogin">The New York Times</a></em> [registration required], the battle pits <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/siri/nys">Sirius Satellite Radio</a>, Inc. (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/siri/nys">SIRI</a>), as led by Howard Stern, and VoteForTheWorst.com -- along with Stern's silent partners: all the other networks -- against <em>American Idol</em>'s corporate sponsors, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation-ltd-del-cl-b/nws/nys">News Corp.</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation-ltd-del-cl-b/nws/nys">NWS</a>) <em>Fox Network</em> and <em>Idol</em>-rights owner, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ckx-inc/ckxe/nas">CKX Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ckx-inc/ckxe/nas">CKXE</a>).</p>
<p>Stern's stated goal is to destroy <em>Idol</em>'s popularity by encouraging people to vote for Malakar, whose unique hair styles and ability to bring 12-year-old girls to tears have contributed to his survival on the show despite weak vocal skills. If Malakar wins, acerbic judge, Simon Cowell, has threatened to quit the show. If Cowell did quit, Stern could indeed damage <em>Idol</em>'s popularity -- people love to hate Cowell.</p>
<p>What is going on here? Your guess is as good as mine. But I think the Malakar furor is great for <em>American Idol</em> -- his Mohawk helped persuade <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ge/nys">General Electric Company</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ge/nys">GE</a>) <em>Today Show</em> to lead with a Malakar story last Wednesday. Stern is trying to boost his own ratings by tapping into <em>Idol</em>'s popularity and today's great coverage by the <em>New York Times</em> won't hurt Stern either.<em> </em></p>
<p>I think News Corp. will be the winner in this skirmish, CKX and Sirius will not benefit significantly, and the losers will continue to be the other networks who try to compete with the <em>Idol </em>juggernaut.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em>Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</em></a><em>, a management consulting and venture capital firm. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em>teaches management at Babson College</em></a><em> and edits </em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em>The Cohan Letter</em></a><em>. He owns shares of General Electric and has no financial interest in the other stocks mentioned in this post. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/31/malakar-and-stern-stir-up-a-ratings-tornado/">Malakar and Stern stir up a ratings tornado</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 31 Mar 2007 16:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/31/malakar-and-stern-stir-up-a-ratings-tornado/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/864443/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/31/malakar-and-stern-stir-up-a-ratings-tornado/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>American Idol</category><category>CKX</category><category>Fox Network</category><category>GE</category><category>Howard Stern</category><category>New York Times</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>ratings</category><category>Sanjay Malakar</category><category>SanjayMalakar</category><category>SIRI</category><category>Sirius</category><category>Today Show</category><category>Vote for the Worst</category><category>VoteForTheWorst</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 16:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Analyst downgrades 3-13-07: RadioShack &amp; Marvell Technology downgraded today]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/13/analyst-downgrades-3-13-07-radioshack-and-marvell-technology-down/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/13/analyst-downgrades-3-13-07-radioshack-and-marvell-technology-down/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/13/analyst-downgrades-3-13-07-radioshack-and-marvell-technology-down/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dg/" rel="tag">Dollar General (DG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rsh/" rel="tag">RadioShack Corp (RSH)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mrvl/" rel="tag">Marvell Technology Group (MRVL)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/03/aol-fly-logo.gif"  alt="" /></a>MOST NOTEWORTHY: </strong>Some of today's more notable downgrades include Accredited Home Lenders Holding Co (LEND), RadioShack Corp (RSH) and Shuffle Master, Inc (SHFL): <br />
<ul>
    <li>Keefe Bruyette cut Accredited <strong>Home Lenders Holding Co </strong>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/accredited-home-lenders-holding-co/lend/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">LEND</a>) to Underperform from Market Perform, saying the downturn in the subprime market raised liquidity concerns on the stock. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>RBC downgraded <strong>RadioShack Corp</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/radioshack-corporation/rsh/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">RSH</a>) to Underperform from Sector Perform, explaining that cost cutting measures are largely complete and margin expansion estimates are too aggressive. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><strong>Shuffle Master Inc</strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/shuffle-master-inc/shfl/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">SHFL</a>) was downgraded to Hold from Buy at Jefferies, citing the lack of visibility into the company's placements and potential IP protection risk in Macau. Shuffle Master was also cut to Underperform from Peer Perform at Bear Stearns following the company's announcement that it will have to restate prior financial results. </li>
</ul>
<strong>OTHER DOWNGRADES: </strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>UBS downgraded shares of <strong>Marvell Technology Group </strong>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvell-technology-group-ltd/mrvl/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">MRVL</a>) to Reduce from Buy, citing risks to HDD demand given upcoming launches by Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) of NAND-based Video iPods. The analyst expects HDD weakness to phase in and not collapse, but sees limited growth in the HDD segment. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Roth Capital cut <strong>WPT Enterprises, Inc </strong>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wpt-enterprises-inc/wpte/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">WPTE</a>) to Sell from Hold, citing valuation, reduced earnings expectations and execution risk related to bringing the online gaming business in house. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><strong>China Eastern Airlines Corp</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/china-eastern-airlines-corporation-limited/cea/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CEA</a>) was downgraded to Underweight from Equal Weight at Morgan Stanley. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><strong>China GrenTech Corp</strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/china-grentech-corporation-limited-american-depositary-shares/grrf/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">GRRF</a>) was downgraded to Neutral from Positive at Susquehanna. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>RBC cut <strong>Nova Chemicals Corp</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nova-chemicals-corporation/ncx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">NCX</a>) to Sector Perform from Outperform.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Sandler downgraded shares of <strong>OceanFirst Financial </strong>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/oceanfirst-financial-corp/ocfc/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">OCFC</a>) to Hold from Buy. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Citigroup downgraded <strong>Dollar General Corp</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dollar-general-corporation/dg/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">DG</a>) to Hold from Buy.</li>
</ul>
<em>Analyst summaries provided by <a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL">TheFlyOnTheWall.com</a> (subscription required).</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/13/analyst-downgrades-3-13-07-radioshack-and-marvell-technology-down/">Analyst downgrades 3-13-07: RadioShack &amp; Marvell Technology downgraded today</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 13 Mar 2007 11:24:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/13/analyst-downgrades-3-13-07-radioshack-and-marvell-technology-down/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/851683/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/13/analyst-downgrades-3-13-07-radioshack-and-marvell-technology-down/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analyst</category><category>cea</category><category>china eastern air</category><category>china grentech</category><category>ChinaEasternAir</category><category>ChinaGrentech</category><category>dg</category><category>dollar gen</category><category>DollarGen</category><category>downgrade</category><category>epte</category><category>grrf</category><category>home lenders</category><category>HomeLenders</category><category>lend</category><category>marvell</category><category>mrvl</category><category>ncx</category><category>nova chem</category><category>NovaChem</category><category>oceanfirst</category><category>ocfc</category><category>radioshack</category><category>ratings</category><category>rsh</category><category>shfl</category><category>shuffle master</category><category>ShuffleMaster</category><category>theflyonthewall.com</category><category>WPT ent</category><category>WptEnt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Shult]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 11:24:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Analyst initiations 3-02-07: GameStop started with a Buy at Nollenberger]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/02/analyst-initiations-3-02-07-gamestop-started-with-a-buy-at-noll/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/02/analyst-initiations-3-02-07-gamestop-started-with-a-buy-at-noll/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/02/analyst-initiations-3-02-07-gamestop-started-with-a-buy-at-noll/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-initiations/" rel="tag">Analyst Initiations</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twc/" rel="tag">Time Warner Cable (TWC)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/03/aol-fly-logo.gif"  alt="" /></a>MOST NOTEWORTHY:</strong> Petrohawk Energy Corp (HAWK), Time Warner Cable Inc (TWC) and GameStop Corp (GME) were today's notable initiations: <br />
<ul>
    <li>Jefferies initiated <strong>Petrohawk Energy Corp </strong>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/petrohawk-energy-corporation/hawk/nas">HAWK</a>) with a Buy rating and $14.50 target, as the firm believes Petrohawk has the right assets to pursue the "acquire-exploit-self" strategy well. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Bear Stearns started <strong>Time Warner Cable</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-cable-inc/twc/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">TWC</a>) with a Peer Perform rating. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><strong>GameStop Corp</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gamestop-corp-cl-a/gme/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">GME</a>)  was initiated with a Buy rating and $67 target at Nollenberger. </li>
</ul>
<strong>OTHER INITIATIONS: </strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>AG Edwards initiated <strong>Venoco, Inc </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/venoco-inc/vq/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">VQ</a>) with a Buy rating on valuation. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Credit Suisse started<strong> CarMax, Inc </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/carmax-inc/kmx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">KMX</a>) with a Neutral rating and $55 target. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Jefferies considers <strong>Ultra Petroleum Corp </strong>(AMEX: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ultra-petroleum-corp/upl/ase?tabs=quotesandnews">UPL</a>) the most dominant company in the Pinedale Anticline, the nation's second largest natural gas field and they expect 2007 to be a pivotal year.<span class="news_story"> The firm initiated Ultra Petroleum with a Buy rating and $64 target.</span></li>
</ul>
<span class="news_story"><em>Analyst summaries provided by <a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL">TheFlyOnTheWall.com</a> (subscription required).</em><br /></span><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/02/analyst-initiations-3-02-07-gamestop-started-with-a-buy-at-noll/">Analyst initiations 3-02-07: GameStop started with a Buy at Nollenberger</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 02 Mar 2007 11:26:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/02/analyst-initiations-3-02-07-gamestop-started-with-a-buy-at-noll/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/844356/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/02/analyst-initiations-3-02-07-gamestop-started-with-a-buy-at-noll/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analyst</category><category>carmax</category><category>gamestop</category><category>gme</category><category>hawk</category><category>initiation</category><category>kmx</category><category>petrohawk</category><category>rating change</category><category>RatingChange</category><category>ratings</category><category>theflyonthewall.com</category><category>time warner cable</category><category>TimeWarnerCable</category><category>twc</category><category>ultra petro</category><category>UltraPetro</category><category>upl</category><category>venoco</category><category>vq</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Shult]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 11:26:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Analyst downgrades 3-02-07: Disappointing Dell dowgraded to Hold]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/02/analyst-downgrades-3-02-07-disappointing-dell-dowgraded-to-hold/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/02/analyst-downgrades-3-02-07-disappointing-dell-dowgraded-to-hold/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/02/analyst-downgrades-3-02-07-disappointing-dell-dowgraded-to-hold/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/txu/" rel="tag">TXU Corp (TXU)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/03/aol-fly-logo.gif"  alt="" /></a>MOST NOTEWORTHY: </strong>Today's more notable downgrades included Dell Inc (DELL), Deutsche Telekom  ADS (DT) and the Nasdaq Stock Market Inc (NDAQ): <br />
<ul>
    <li>Needham downgraded <strong>Dell inc</strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">DELL</a>)  to Hold from Buy after the Q4 results as they now believe the company is unlikely to outperform for "at least" several quarters. They considered Dell's notebook shipments to be the biggest disappointment in the quarter. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><strong>Deutsche Telecom ADS </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/deutsche-telekom-ads/dt/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">DT</a>) was cut to Sell from Neutral at Merrill Lynch. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>JP Morgan downgraded the <strong>Nasdaq Stock Market Inc</strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nasdaq-stock-market-inc-the/ndaq/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">NDAQ</a>) to Neutral from Overweight following the company's price cuts as they feel the new prices negatively impact the U.S. cash equity business. </li>
</ul>
<strong>OTHER DOWNGRADES: </strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>Baird cut <strong>Xerium Technologies Inc </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xerium-technologies-inc/xrm/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">XRM</a>) to Underperform from Neutral, citing increased spending plans and pressure from the underlying paper market that raised dividend sustainability concerns. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>First Albany downgraded <strong>Hyperion Solutions Corp</strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hyperion-solutions-corporation/hysl/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">HYSL</a>) to Neutral from Buy. <br /></li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Sanders Morris cut <strong>Crosstex Energy</strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/crosstex-energy-l-p-common-units-representing-limited-partner-interests/xtex/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">XTEX</a>) to Hold from Buy. Raymond James downgraded shares of Crosstex to Market Perform from Outpeform. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Bernstein downgraded <strong>TXU Corp </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/txu-corp/txu/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">TXU</a>) to Market Perform from Outperform as the firm believe the current bid from Kohlberg Kravis Roberts and Texas Pacific Group will succeed. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Merrill Lynch cut <strong>Altera Corp </strong>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/altera-corporation/altr/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">ALTR</a>) to Neutral from Buy. </li>
</ul>
<em>Analyst summaries provided by <a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL">TheFlyOnTheWall.com</a> (subscription required).</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/02/analyst-downgrades-3-02-07-disappointing-dell-dowgraded-to-hold/">Analyst downgrades 3-02-07: Disappointing Dell dowgraded to Hold</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 02 Mar 2007 11:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/02/analyst-downgrades-3-02-07-disappointing-dell-dowgraded-to-hold/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/844346/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/02/analyst-downgrades-3-02-07-disappointing-dell-dowgraded-to-hold/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>altera</category><category>altr</category><category>analyst</category><category>crosstex</category><category>dell</category><category>deutsche</category><category>downgrades</category><category>dt</category><category>hyperion</category><category>hysl</category><category>nasdaq stock market</category><category>NasdaqStockMarket</category><category>ndaq</category><category>rating change</category><category>RatingChange</category><category>ratings</category><category>theflyonthewall.com</category><category>txu</category><category>xerium</category><category>xrm</category><category>xtex</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Shult]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 11:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Disney jumped with shark with 'Grey's Anatomy']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/23/disney-should-be-worried-that-greys-anatomy-jumped-the-shark/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/23/disney-should-be-worried-that-greys-anatomy-jumped-the-shark/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/23/disney-should-be-worried-that-greys-anatomy-jumped-the-shark/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/iaci/" rel="tag">IAC/InterActiveCorp (IACI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a></p><p>Walt Disney Co. (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">DIS</a>) shareholders should be concerned that 'Grey's Anatomy,' one of its biggest hits, jumped the shark last night.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jump_the_shark">Jump the shark</a> is pop-culture slang indicating that a TV show has reached its peak. It derives from an episode of "Happy Days" in which Fonzie literally jumped over a shark on water skies while wearing his trademark leather jacket. The hit program just wasn't the same afterwords.</p>
<p>"Grey's Anatomy" didn't just jump the shark, it jumped the whole ocean with tearjerker of an episode in which the show's title character had a near-death experience after accidentally falling into the water. Somehow the effects of hypothermia didn't kill Meredith Grey and her heart started beating again after her best friend Christina Yang told everyone to take one more shot at reviving her. Of course, they did it and Grey pulled through just fine. Can anyone in the medical field tell me how often that happens in real life?</p>
<p>This blunder creates a problem for Disney's ABC network, which reportedly has plans to do <a href="http://dis.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/21/will-the-greys-anatomy-spinoff-be-another-csi-or-joey/">a spin-off</a> of the drama. The company wants to make Greys a tent pole franchise similar to the "Law and Order" and "CSI" shows which are cash-cows for General Electric Co.'s (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">GE</a>) and CBS Corp. (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation-cl-b/cbs/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CBS</a>) respectively.</p>
<p>ABC may find that difficult to do. Once an audience gets turned off to a program, it's hard to convince them to go back. The advertisers know this and shift their spending accordingly.</p>
<p>What ABC is equivalent to McDonald's Corp. (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcdonald-s-corporation/mcd/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">MCD</a>) putting Cheez Whiz on the Quarter Pounder or Starbucks Co. (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starbucks-corporation/sbux/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">SBUX</a>) deciding to only play music from hair metal bands from the 1980s in its stores. The network tried to fix something that wasn't broke and will pay for it over the long term.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/23/disney-should-be-worried-that-greys-anatomy-jumped-the-shark/">Disney jumped with shark with 'Grey's Anatomy'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 23 Feb 2007 09:09:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/23/disney-should-be-worried-that-greys-anatomy-jumped-the-shark/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/839028/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/23/disney-should-be-worried-that-greys-anatomy-jumped-the-shark/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advertising</category><category>commerciaqls</category><category>greys anatomy</category><category>GreysAnatomy</category><category>jump the shark</category><category>JumpTheShark</category><category>ratings</category><category>television</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 09:09:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Analyst initiations 2-22-07: E*Trade started with a Buy rating at UBS]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/22/analyst-initiations-2-22-07-e-trade-started-with-a-buy-rating-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/22/analyst-initiations-2-22-07-e-trade-started-with-a-buy-rating-a/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/22/analyst-initiations-2-22-07-e-trade-started-with-a-buy-rating-a/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amtd/" rel="tag">TD AmeriTrade Holding (AMTD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mat/" rel="tag">Mattel, Inc (MAT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-initiations/" rel="tag">Analyst Initiations</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/02/aol-fly-logo.gif"  alt="" /></a>MOST NOTEWORTHY: </strong>Plexus Corp (PLXS) and Ameristar Casinos Inc (ASCA) were some of today's most notable initiations: <br />
<ul>
    <li>Lehman initiated<strong> Plexus Corp </strong>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/plexus-corp/plxs/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">PLXS</a>) with an Underweight rating and $15.50 target. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Wachovia started <strong>Ameristar Casinos Inc </strong>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ameristar-casinos-inc/asca/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">ASCA</a>) with an Outperform rating; the firm sees upside for Ameristar through growth of existing properties that have expansions and the removal of the $500 loss limit in Missouri. </li>
</ul>
<strong>OTHER INITIATIONS:</strong> <br />
<ul>
    <li><strong>Mattel Inc </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mattel-inc/mat/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">MAT</a>) was initiated with a Hold rating at Sterne Agee. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>First Albany started <strong>Gaming Partners International Corp</strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gaming-partners-international-corporation/gpic/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">GPIC</a>) with a Buy rating and $23 target. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Jefferies initiated <strong>Morgans Hotel Group Co</strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgans-hotel-group-co/mhgc/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">MHGC</a>) with a Hold rating and $20 target based on valuation. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>UBS started <strong>E*Trade Financial Corp </strong>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/e-trade-financial-corporation/etfc/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">ETFC</a>) with a Buy rating and $29 target. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>UBS also started <strong>TD Ameritrade Holding Corp </strong>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/td-ameritrade-holding-corporation/amtd/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">AMTD</a>) with a Neutral rating on valuation. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Stifel initiated <strong>Saia Inc</strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/saia-inc/saia/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">SAIA</a>) with a Buy rating and $31 target; the firm is positive on Saia's growth and said the company should be the biggest beneficiary of further tonnage leakage from Central Freight Lines, which recently went private. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>William Blair started <strong>US BioEnergy Corp</strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/us-bioenergy-corporation/usbe/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">USBE</a>) with an Outperform rating. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>JMP Securities assumed coverage of <strong>Delta Financial Corp</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/delta-financial-corporation/dfc/ase?tabs=quotesandnews">DFC</a>) with a Strong Buy rating and $13 target. </li>
</ul>
<em>Analyst summaries provided by <a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL">TheFlyOnTheWall.com </a>(subscription required).</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/22/analyst-initiations-2-22-07-e-trade-started-with-a-buy-rating-a/">Analyst initiations 2-22-07: E*Trade started with a Buy rating at UBS</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 22 Feb 2007 11:43:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/22/analyst-initiations-2-22-07-e-trade-started-with-a-buy-rating-a/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/837180/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/22/analyst-initiations-2-22-07-e-trade-started-with-a-buy-rating-a/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ameristar</category><category>ameritrade</category><category>amtd</category><category>analyst</category><category>asca</category><category>delta financial</category><category>DeltaFinancial</category><category>dfc</category><category>e*trade</category><category>esbe</category><category>etfc</category><category>gaming parthers</category><category>GamingParthers</category><category>gpic</category><category>initiations</category><category>mat</category><category>mattel</category><category>mhgc</category><category>morgans</category><category>plexus</category><category>plxs</category><category>ratings</category><category>saia</category><category>theflyonthewall.com</category><category>us bioenergy</category><category>UsBioenergy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Shult]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 11:43:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Analyst upgrades 2-16-07: Coke &amp; Pepsi upgraded at Goldman]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/16/analyst-upgrades-2-16-07-coke-and-pepsi-upgraded-at-goldman/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/16/analyst-upgrades-2-16-07-coke-and-pepsi-upgraded-at-goldman/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/16/analyst-upgrades-2-16-07-coke-and-pepsi-upgraded-at-goldman/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ko/" rel="tag">Coca-Cola (KO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pep/" rel="tag">PepsiCo (PEP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/avp/" rel="tag">Avon Products (AVP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cl/" rel="tag">Colgate-Palmolive (CL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gis/" rel="tag">General Mills (GIS)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/02/aol-fly-logo.gif"  alt="" /></a>MOST NOTEWORTHY:</strong> Rivals Coca-Cola Co (KO) and PepsiCo Inc (PEP), as well as General Mills (GIS), were today's notable upgrades. <br />
<ul>
    <li>Goldman Sachs upgraded both <strong>The Coca-Coca Co </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-coca-cola-company/ko/nys">KO</a>) and <strong>PepsiCo Inc </strong>(NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pepsico-inc/pep/nys?tabs=quotesandnews"> PEP</a>) to Buy from Neutral: The upgrade for Coca-Coca was to reflect the company's recent strong results, and Pepsi's upgrade was to reflect Gatorade's expected profit re-acceleration by the second half of 2007.  </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><strong>General Mills Inc </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-mills-inc/gis/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">GIS</a>) was upgraded to Market Perform from Underperform at BMO Capital Markets with a $58 target based on achievable outlook and absence of any negative catalysts. </li>
</ul>
<strong>OTHER UPGRADES:</strong> <br />
<ul>
    <li>Bank of America upgraded <strong>Colgate-Palmolive Co</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/colgate-palmolive-company/cl/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CL</a>) to Buy from Neutral with a $74 target. The firm believes Colgate's long-term growth rate can accelerate to 12-13% from 10% on margin upside. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Prudential upgraded shares of <strong>Avon Products Inc </strong>(NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/avon-products-inc/avp/nys?tabs=quotesandnews"> AVP</a>) to Neutral from Underweight to reflect the company's improving fundamentals; the firm believes that news over the last six months has been getting more positive. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Buckingham upgraded <strong>Tween Brands Inc </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/tween-brands-inc/twb/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">TWB</a>) to Accumulate from Neutral. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>CIBC upgraded <strong>Cablevision Systems Corp</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cablevision-systems-corporation/cvc/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CVC</a>) to Buy from Hold. Raymond James raised Lithia Motors (LAD) to Strong Buy from Market Perform following its Q4 report and guidance. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>First Albany upgraded <strong>Stamps.com Inc </strong>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/stamps-com-inc/stmp/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">STMP</a>) to Buy from Neutral, with a $19 target. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Deutsche Bank upgraded <strong>International Paper Co</strong> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-paper-company/ip/nys?tabs=quotesandnews"> IP</a>), <strong>Packaging Corp of America</strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/packaging-corporation-of-america/pkg/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">PKG</a>) and <strong>Smurfit-Stone Container Corp </strong>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/smurfit-stone-container-corporation/sscc/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">SSCC</a>) to Buy from Hold. The firm believes momentum is turning and backlogs and pricing are emerging from the winter doldrums stronger than expected.</li>
</ul>
<em>Analyst summaries provided by <a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL">TheFlyOnTheWall.com</a> (subscription required).</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/16/analyst-upgrades-2-16-07-coke-and-pepsi-upgraded-at-goldman/">Analyst upgrades 2-16-07: Coke &amp; Pepsi upgraded at Goldman</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/16/analyst-upgrades-2-16-07-coke-and-pepsi-upgraded-at-goldman/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/755591/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/16/analyst-upgrades-2-16-07-coke-and-pepsi-upgraded-at-goldman/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>avon</category><category>avp</category><category>cablevision</category><category>cl</category><category>coca-cola</category><category>coke</category><category>colgate</category><category>cvc</category><category>general mills</category><category>GeneralMills</category><category>gis</category><category>international paper</category><category>InternationalPaper</category><category>ip</category><category>ko</category><category>packaging corp of america</category><category>PackagingCorpOfAmerica</category><category>palmolive</category><category>pep</category><category>pepsi</category><category>pkg</category><category>rating change</category><category>RatingChange</category><category>ratings</category><category>smurfit-Stone</category><category>sscc</category><category>stamps</category><category>stmp</category><category>theflyonthewall.com</category><category>twb</category><category>tween</category><category>upgrade</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Shult]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:28:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
