<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Innovation does not happen overnight, says Microsoft's Ballmer]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/23/innovation-does-not-happen-overnight-says-microsofts-ballmer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/23/innovation-does-not-happen-overnight-says-microsofts-ballmer/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/23/innovation-does-not-happen-overnight-says-microsofts-ballmer/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/crm/" rel="tag">salesforce.com inc (CRM)</a></p>When <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) CEO Steve Ballmer speaks, dissecting his words can sometimes take a while. The brash but successful CEO sometimes says things that demonstrate arrogance or a misunderstanding of certain markets, but generally he's right on target. Ballmer recently stated that Microsoft's mantra is "staying ahead" in the constantly changing disruptions in the software business.<br /><br />Now, the "software business" can be defined differently than it was even six years ago. Companies like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/salesforce-com-inc/crm/nys">salesforce.com, inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/salesforce-com-inc/crm/nys">CRM</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) have taken software applications out of computers and put them on the web. All that is needed is an Internet connection and a web browser -- <a href="http://www.zdnetasia.com/news/software/0,39044164,62015203,00.htm">no software updates or service packs needed</a> -- ever. Is that what Ballmer is talking about? Perhaps. The handpicked successor to Bill Gates -- Ray Ozzie -- will have a plate higher than almost anyone in the world soon (like, now) as Microsoft tries to catch up in the world where "software" is increasingly being deployed via the Internet.<br /><br />Do IT departments embrace change? Ballmer doesn't think so, as he sees them building non-disruptive competencies around what business needs are (and will be). If this enough? In a world full of change, this can be a disaster waiting to happen. With Microsoft spending around $6 billion per fiscal year in the R&amp;D field, what can the software giant do to unplug that kind of thinking? Ballmer says that, "there is a view that innovation happens overnight and that's simply not the case. It took us eight to 10 years to get Windows popular, and many years to get databases popular." This is true -- but it's a different world now where CDs aren't used for software distribution and database development happens way, way outside the customer facility. Innovation happening overnight? That<strong><em> is </em></strong>the new ballgame, Steve.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/23/innovation-does-not-happen-overnight-says-microsofts-ballmer/">Innovation does not happen overnight, says Microsoft's Ballmer</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 23 May 2007 11:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.zdnetasia.com/news/software/0,39044164,62015203,00.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/23/innovation-does-not-happen-overnight-says-microsofts-ballmer/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/902199/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/23/innovation-does-not-happen-overnight-says-microsofts-ballmer/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bill Gates</category><category>BillGates</category><category>CRM</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>Microsoft, Inc.</category><category>Microsoft,Inc.</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Ray Ozzie</category><category>RayOzzie</category><category>Steve Ballmer</category><category>SteveBallmer</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 11:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft's Ray Ozzie is quiet behind the scenes]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/02/microsofts-ray-ozzie-is-quiet-behind-the-scenes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/02/microsofts-ray-ozzie-is-quiet-behind-the-scenes/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/02/microsofts-ray-ozzie-is-quiet-behind-the-scenes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/insiders/" rel="tag">Insiders</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p>If you follow Microsoft's (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) Ray Ozzie, you know that the guy is secretive, soft-spoken and is a master of getting things done behind the scenes without drawing too much competitive oversight from the industry. What has he delivered for the world's largest software maker? So far, Ozzie <a href="http://news.com.com/Ozzies+quiet+revolution+at+Microsoft/2008-1012-6180428.html?part=dht&amp;tag=nl.e703">has been long on vision and planning</a>, but the fruits of all that labor are still in the middling stage.<br /><br />Don't expect that stage to remain the same forever, though. Ozzie appears to have the wherewithal to ensure Microsoft morphs from a software company to an Internet services company (in some form) as the days of locally-installed software decline and the days of network-based computing rise. The first sign of this is Google (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>), which lives entirely (for the most part) inside a web browser -- no software needed. There are outsiders like Google Earth and Google Desktop, sure. But, Google's entire revenue base comes from customers "inside the browser", not working on installed desktop software.<br /><br />It's true that Microsoft is not yet an advertising-supported business (like Google), and its strides to get there are taking baby steps in my opinion. <a href="http://news.com.com/Ozzies+quiet+revolution+at+Microsoft/2008-1012-6180428.html?part=dht&amp;tag=nl.e703">It's far behind the competition here</a>, but it will get better most likely. Meanwhile, Ozzie's belief that the industry is changing from software to services is already being exemplified by companies like Amazon (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">AMZN</a>) and eBay (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas">EBAY</a>). Microsoft's sluggishness in moving toward an ad-supported business model (for consumers, anyway) can be attributed to its fixation on its massive on-premises software business.<br /><br />Can Microsoft successfully make the transition from software company to "software services" company along with receiving a portion of its revenue from advertising? The company has a long way to go and massive changes are needed in its business model. Ozzie, though, is probably the best person to transform the software giant.<br /><br /><em>Disclosure: I own MSFT shares as of 5-2-07</em><br /><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/02/microsofts-ray-ozzie-is-quiet-behind-the-scenes/">Microsoft's Ray Ozzie is quiet behind the scenes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 02 May 2007 19:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.com.com/Ozzies+quiet+revolution+at+Microsoft/2008-1012-6180428.html?part=dht&amp;tag=nl.e703>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/02/microsofts-ray-ozzie-is-quiet-behind-the-scenes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/886217/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/02/microsofts-ray-ozzie-is-quiet-behind-the-scenes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bill Gates</category><category>BillGates</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Ray Ozzie</category><category>RayOzzie</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 19:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Liveblogging Microsoft's Q2 quarterly results]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/25/liveblogging-microsofts-q2-quarterly-results/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/25/liveblogging-microsofts-q2-quarterly-results/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/25/liveblogging-microsofts-q2-quarterly-results/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/live-coverage/" rel="tag">Live Coverage</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/01/microsoft-logo.jpg" alt="" />Here we are waiting for Microsoft's second quarter earnings webcast/conference call to start. To get a primer, visit <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/23/microsofts-earnings-wont-be-great/">the preview post from last week</a> to see what the analysts are expecting to this afternoon's results.<br /><br />All times below are in Eastern Standard Time (EST). Remember to hit the "Refresh" button on your browser every few minutes, since I'll be updating this post every few minutes or so.<br /><br />Here we go!<br /><br />5:31pm -- on hold waiting for the call to start. Diddle dee, diddle dum...<br /><br />5:32pm -- here we go -- $12.54 billion in revenue for the quarter ended 12-31-06. This is a record for Microsoft for a quarter. I wonder if the xbox 360 had anything to do with this (heh). Let's press forward...<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/25/liveblogging-microsofts-q2-quarterly-results/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Liveblogging Microsoft's Q2 quarterly results</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/25/liveblogging-microsofts-q2-quarterly-results/">Liveblogging Microsoft's Q2 quarterly results</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 25 Jan 2007 17:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.microsoft.com/msft/default.mspx>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/25/liveblogging-microsofts-q2-quarterly-results/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/741642/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/25/liveblogging-microsofts-q2-quarterly-results/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bill Gates</category><category>BillGates</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>Microsoft Quarterly Results</category><category>MicrosoftQuarterlyResults</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Ray Ozzie</category><category>RayOzzie</category><category>Steve Ballmer</category><category>SteveBallmer</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 17:27:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Steve Ballmer matters less than anyone in business?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/23/steve-ballmer-matters-less-than-anyone-in-business/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/23/steve-ballmer-matters-less-than-anyone-in-business/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/23/steve-ballmer-matters-less-than-anyone-in-business/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a></p><p><img id="vimage_1" alt="steve ballmer doesn't matter" hspace="4" src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/06/ballmer_dontmatter.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer can't get no love. His <a href="http://www.ntk.net/media/dancemonkeyboy.mpg">famous "monkey boy" performance</a> is crazy-popular among those who thrive on poking fun at (and re-mixing) Ballmer's sweaty antics. He's being marginalized as Ray Ozzie and Craig Mundie are groomed to replace Gates (and, we imagine, Ballmer as well) -- and reporters&nbsp;and analysts&nbsp;are <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/19/microsoft-after-the-bell-06-19-06-messenger-upgrade-everybody/">jostling to get past him and talk to Ozzie</a>, who<em> everyone</em> seems to adore.</p>
<p>Now the <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2006/06/21/technology/10dontmatter.biz2/index.htm">worst possible judgment, from <em>Business</em> <em>2.0 Magazine</em></a>. He just doesn't matter. And what's more: he matters less than anyone in business. Ouch.</p>
<p>In conjunction with the <a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/business2/peoplewhomatter/index.html">mag's "50 Who Matter Now" list</a> (featuring Ray Ozzie and competitive leaders Steve Jobs, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, and worst of all for Ballmer's ego, Bill Gates himself), Ballmer headlines the "10 People Who Don't Matter" segment. "Let's face it: The head of the world's biggest software company is a lame duck," the judgment begins.</p>
<p>A lame duck who decides what happens with billions of investors' -- of <em>your</em> -- cash. Somehow, that's not very comforting.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/23/steve-ballmer-matters-less-than-anyone-in-business/">Steve Ballmer matters less than anyone in business?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:16:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2006/06/21/technology/10dontmatter.biz2/index.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/23/steve-ballmer-matters-less-than-anyone-in-business/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/636307/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/23/steve-ballmer-matters-less-than-anyone-in-business/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2.0</category><category>ballmer</category><category>business 2.0</category><category>Business2.0</category><category>ceo</category><category>craig mundie</category><category>CraigMundie</category><category>don't matter</category><category>Don'tMatter</category><category>matter</category><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft ceo</category><category>MicrosoftCeo</category><category>ozzie</category><category>people who matter</category><category>PeopleWhoMatter</category><category>ray ozzie</category><category>RayOzzie</category><category>steve ballmer</category><category>SteveBallmer</category><category>web 2.0</category><category>Web2.0</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:16:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft after the bell 06-22-06: the Gates legacy?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/22/microsoft-after-the-bell-06-22-06-the-gates-legacy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/22/microsoft-after-the-bell-06-22-06-the-gates-legacy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/22/microsoft-after-the-bell-06-22-06-the-gates-legacy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><p><img id="vimage_1" alt="microsoft intraday chart 06-22-2006" hspace="4" src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/06/msft_chart_06222006.gjpg.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />I predict that, for the rest of the summer, all news of Microsoft, Inc.&nbsp;will be tinged by the impending departure of Bill Gates from day-to-day operations. Who will take his mantle? <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2006/06/21/technology/microsoft.reut/index.htm">Who else will leave</a>? And, grandly, <a href="http://aol.businessweek.com/technology/content/jun2006/tc20060622_627526.htm">what will be his legacy</a>?</p>
<p>Steve Hamm of <em>BusinessWeek</em> wonders, will Gates be remembered for his innovations and good works, or for his anti-competitive "bare-knuckle tactics"? Hamm's conclusion seems to be that Gates deserves the Carnegie legacy (as opposed to Rockefeller) thanks to the thousands of millionaires he minted and the great works he's already begun to do with his foundation.</p>
<p>Evidently, the legacy didn't look great to investors (or maybe they're just still smarting over <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/22/google-and-adobe-sign-expansive-distribution-deal/">Google's success in capturing Adobe's heart</a>, an <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/06/why-does-adobe-hate-microsoft-so/">obvious snub of Microsoft</a> in favor of the company's&nbsp;oogly rival), as the stock was down 20 cents to $22.88.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/22/microsoft-after-the-bell-06-22-06-the-gates-legacy/">Microsoft after the bell 06-22-06: the Gates legacy?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 22 Jun 2006 18:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://aol.businessweek.com/technology/content/jun2006/tc20060622_627526.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/22/microsoft-after-the-bell-06-22-06-the-gates-legacy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/636076/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/22/microsoft-after-the-bell-06-22-06-the-gates-legacy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>$22.88</category><category>adobe</category><category>adobe google</category><category>adobe microsoft</category><category>adobe pdf</category><category>AdobeGoogle</category><category>AdobeMicrosoft</category><category>AdobePdf</category><category>bill gates</category><category>bill gates legacy</category><category>BillGates</category><category>BillGatesLegacy</category><category>gates</category><category>gates leaving</category><category>gates legacy</category><category>gates retiring</category><category>gates stepping down</category><category>GatesLeaving</category><category>GatesLegacy</category><category>GatesRetiring</category><category>GatesSteppingDown</category><category>google adobe</category><category>GoogleAdobe</category><category>legacy</category><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft adobe</category><category>MicrosoftAdobe</category><category>msft</category><category>pdf</category><category>ray ozzie</category><category>RayOzzie</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 18:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft after the bell 06-19-06: messenger upgrade, everybody loves Ray]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/19/microsoft-after-the-bell-06-19-06-messenger-upgrade-everybody/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/19/microsoft-after-the-bell-06-19-06-messenger-upgrade-everybody/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/19/microsoft-after-the-bell-06-19-06-messenger-upgrade-everybody/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><p><img id="vimage_1" alt="windows live coming soon" hspace="4" src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/06/windows_live_areyouready.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Evidently, investors were feeling good about Microsoft's future today, after concerns late last week. Maybe it was the <a href="http://articles.news.aol.com/business/article.adp?id=20060619183609990007">new version of Messenger released today</a>. Maybe it was general <a href="http://news.com.com/2100-1014_3-6085030.html">warm-and-fuzzies over the prospects of leaders like Ray Ozzie</a>, who will inherit much of Bill Gates' technology leadership (and, if&nbsp;Ray's <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Gillmor/?p=281">listening to Steve Gillmor's advice</a>, he will "seize control of the company alongside Steve Ballmer, not as a greater of equals with Craig Mundie"). Either way the stock was <a href="http://finance.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?sym=MSFT&amp;exch=NAS">up over 2%, or 45 cents, to $22.55</a>.</p>
<p>MSN Messenger has been renamed along with so many other properties under the "MSN" moniker, to "Windows Live Messenger." While I don't love this focus on the "live"-ness of everything Microsoft (as opposed to the <a href="http://www.greghughes.net/rant/DeadMansTaleBeAPirateAndGetReadyFoTheNewWindowsLiveMessengerIMClient.aspx">dead</a> messenger? We all know that instant messenger programs <em>do</em> get people in the flesh, it seems so redundant to have to mention that), <a href="http://hive.net/Member/blogs/the_insider/archive/2006/06/18/Windows-Live-Messenger-Final-is-on-the-way.aspx">people seem excited</a> about the new product.</p>
<p>Oddly, though, the "live" debut seems to have hit a snafu ...&nbsp;users are reporting a&nbsp;<a href="http://get.live.com/messenger/comingsoon">"coming soon"&nbsp;page</a> where the <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2006/jun06/06-19LiveEraPR.mspx">press release points to a download</a>.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/19/microsoft-after-the-bell-06-19-06-messenger-upgrade-everybody/">Microsoft after the bell 06-19-06: messenger upgrade, everybody loves Ray</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 19 Jun 2006 18:48:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/19/microsoft-after-the-bell-06-19-06-messenger-upgrade-everybody/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/634875/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/19/microsoft-after-the-bell-06-19-06-messenger-upgrade-everybody/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>$22.55</category><category>after the bell</category><category>AfterTheBell</category><category>at the bell</category><category>AtTheBell</category><category>im</category><category>instant messenger</category><category>InstantMessenger</category><category>messenger</category><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft messenger</category><category>MicrosoftMessenger</category><category>msft</category><category>msn messenger</category><category>MsnMessenger</category><category>ozzie</category><category>ray ozzie</category><category>RayOzzie</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 18:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft's biggest challenge isn't Google or open-source competitors]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/19/microsofts-biggest-challenge-isnt-google-or-open-source-compet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/19/microsofts-biggest-challenge-isnt-google-or-open-source-compet/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/19/microsofts-biggest-challenge-isnt-google-or-open-source-compet/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><p>What is Microsoft's largest challenge these days? Google? Yahoo!? Open-source software? Its own fumblings?&nbsp;All of those <em>partially contribute</em> to the equation. But the larger picture says that Microsoft's ability to grow, using any and all methods that can sustain the company long-term, is its biggest challenge. So, how does old Softie go about growing? That is the billion-dollar question.<br /><br />Does Bill Gates' recent decision to leave day-to-day responsibilities at Microsoft reflect that he knows growth from a well-planned changing of the guard is needed? Probably so. <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/19/break-it-up-bill/">Blogging Stocks' Peter Cohan's post</a> paints a good view of what is coming to Microsoft if it wants to reward itself and shareholders by ensuring growth and the most cohesive corporate strategy comes to fruition -- perhaps it can survive better and compete at the needed pace by divesting itself into separate entities.<br /><br />It's odd that a seemingly-simple information conduit like the web browser could turn out to be Microsoft's greatest fear -- how can it grow to bypass the need for equitable and freely-accessible information and applications that live on the web and not on the PC? Sun Microsystems' former CEO <strong>Scott McNealy</strong>, although chided constantly at the company he founded for not growing at a rapid pace like the competition, was quite prophetic years ago by proclaiming that "<a href="http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/jonathan?entry=the_network_is_the_computer">the network is the computer</a>." </p>
<p>This is a mantra that current CEO Jonathan Schwartz still trumpets to this day. Perhaps McNealy will get the last laugh over Bill Gates after all -- or maybe not. Microsoft doesn't want this network computing consumer trajectory just yet. That is, not until it can develop and deliver an infrastructure to compete on that layer --&nbsp;something Google just can't stop doing. <a href="http://www.columbusdispatch.com/business-story.php?story=dispatch/2006/06/18/20060618-G1-02.html"><em>Ray Ozzie has a monumental task ahead.<br /></em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/19/microsofts-biggest-challenge-isnt-google-or-open-source-compet/">Microsoft's biggest challenge isn't Google or open-source competitors</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 19 Jun 2006 13:23:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.columbusdispatch.com/business-story.php?story=dispatch/2006/06/18/20060618-G1-02.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/19/microsofts-biggest-challenge-isnt-google-or-open-source-compet/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/634612/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/19/microsofts-biggest-challenge-isnt-google-or-open-source-compet/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ballmer</category><category>Bill Gates</category><category>BillGates</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Ray Ozzie</category><category>RayOzzie</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 13:23:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is Microsoft ready for a makeover?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/20/is-microsoft-ready-for-a-makeover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/20/is-microsoft-ready-for-a-makeover/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/20/is-microsoft-ready-for-a-makeover/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p>Microsoft's stock price hasn't moved much since 2002 and Bill Gates signaled he's ready for a leadership makeover.The winner for that challenge is Ray Ozzie, who joined Microsoft just a year ago after his company, Groove Networks,was bought by Microsoft.&nbsp; In just one year's time he's proved his value to Microsoft and is slated to leadMicrosoft's strategic thinking efforts for new software development.</p>
<p>Ozzie will webify everything -- findingways to weave Microsoft's entire product line into the power of the Internet.&nbsp; "Everything we do should havea presence on the Web," Ozzie told<em> Fortune</em> magazine.</p>
<p>Microsoft started its march to the Web lastNovember when it launched Windows Live, which includes a search service, news and e-mail to compete directly withGoogle and Yahoo.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/20/is-microsoft-ready-for-a-makeover/">Is Microsoft ready for a makeover?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 20 Apr 2006 09:37:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2006/04/19/technology/fastforward_fortune/index.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/20/is-microsoft-ready-for-a-makeover/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/610195/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/20/is-microsoft-ready-for-a-makeover/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Google</category><category>Groove Networks</category><category>GrooveNetworks</category><category>Microfit</category><category>Ray Ozzie</category><category>RayOzzie</category><category>Windows Live</category><category>WindowsLive</category><category>Yahoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lita Epstein]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 09:37:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
