<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Labor Market Continues to Show Signs of Improvement]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/labor-market-improvement/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/labor-market-improvement/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/labor-market-improvement/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/workspace/" rel="tag">Workspace</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="laborers" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/09/springhill1.jpg" />According to the ADP Employer Services Report, the private sector <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/30/us-usa-economy-idUSN3027570820110330">added 201,000 new jobs</a> in March, basically in-line with 203,000 new jobs that analysts had been expecting to see.</p>
<p>February's figures were revised downwards to 208,000 from a previously estimated 216,000 new jobs.</p>
<p>March's employment gains bring the four-month average of new jobs to 211,000, more than enough to keep the labor track on path. Analysts estimate that the economy needs to add 125,000 new jobs each month in order to keep up with population growth, so any jobs over that figure result in a lower unemployment figures.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/labor-market-improvement/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Labor Market Continues to Show Signs of Improvement</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/labor-market-improvement/">Labor Market Continues to Show Signs of Improvement</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/labor-market-improvement/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19897221/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/labor-market-improvement/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ADP Employer Services Report</category><category>consumer prices</category><category>economy</category><category>employees</category><category>gas prices</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job cuts</category><category>jobs</category><category>recession</category><category>recovery</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Family Dollar Earnings Top Estimates, Sending Shares Higher]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/family-dollar-earnings-tops-estimates-sending-shares-higher/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/family-dollar-earnings-tops-estimates-sending-shares-higher/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/family-dollar-earnings-tops-estimates-sending-shares-higher/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fdo/" rel="tag">Family Dollar Stores (FDO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="Family Dollar (FDO) logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2011/03/family-dollar-logo.jpg" />Discount retailer Family Dollar Stores Inc. (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/family-dollar-stores-inc/fdo/nys">FDO</a>) reported its <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703712504576232342930190866.html">fiscal second quarter results</a> this morning, topping analyst estimates and sending the stock higher in premarket trading. <br />
<br />
For the quarter, Family Dollar reported it earned 98 cents per share, topping analyst estimates by a penny. During the same period last year, the company earned 81 cents per share.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/family-dollar-earnings-tops-estimates-sending-shares-higher/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Family Dollar Earnings Top Estimates, Sending Shares Higher</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/family-dollar-earnings-tops-estimates-sending-shares-higher/">Family Dollar Earnings Top Estimates, Sending Shares Higher</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 30 Mar 2011 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/family-dollar-earnings-tops-estimates-sending-shares-higher/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19897022/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/30/family-dollar-earnings-tops-estimates-sending-shares-higher/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer confidence</category><category>earnings</category><category>earnings report</category><category>Family Dollar</category><category>Family Dollar earnings</category><category>FDO</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>recession</category><category>retailers</category><category>sales</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Women Top the Home Foreclosure List: Here's What to Do]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/07/women-top-the-home-foreclosure-list-heres-what-to-do/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/07/women-top-the-home-foreclosure-list-heres-what-to-do/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/07/women-top-the-home-foreclosure-list-heres-what-to-do/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><img border="1" align="right" vspace="4" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/foreclosure.jpg"  alt="" />Despite recent signs of economic recovery, the mortgage crisis has proved to be one that has refused to go away despite valiant efforts of government bailouts, incentive programs and rate adjustments.  In fact, with RealtyTrac projecting the foreclosure number for 2011 to be over 1 million for the second year in a row, it looks like the problem is likely to worsen before it gets better, especially in light of the government's failing "relief programs."<br />
<br />
At the top of the foreclosure list is female homeowners -- in a market where the number of women buying homes in the past decade has doubled and, in a recent poll, shown on average to control approximately 75% of the family finances. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/07/women-top-the-home-foreclosure-list-heres-what-to-do/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Women Top the Home Foreclosure List: Here's What to Do</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/07/women-top-the-home-foreclosure-list-heres-what-to-do/">Women Top the Home Foreclosure List: Here's What to Do</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 07 Mar 2011 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/07/women-top-the-home-foreclosure-list-heres-what-to-do/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19871128/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/07/women-top-the-home-foreclosure-list-heres-what-to-do/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>debt</category><category>foreclosures</category><category>housing</category><category>loan remodifications</category><category>recession</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hilary Kramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Pending Home Sales Down in January]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/28/pending-home-sales-down-in-january/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/28/pending-home-sales-down-in-january/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/28/pending-home-sales-down-in-january/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/04/pricereducedsign.jpg"  alt="pending home sales" />The housing market got a bit of bad news Monday morning, with <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-02-28/pending-sales-of-u-s-existing-homes-decline-by-2-8-more-than-forecast.html">pending home sales falling</a> faster than expected in January.</p>
<p>Consumer confidence has been on the rise over the past couple of months, but that boost in confidence did not carry over to pending home sales, which were down 2.8% during the month of January.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/28/pending-home-sales-down-in-january/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Pending Home Sales Down in January</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/28/pending-home-sales-down-in-january/">Pending Home Sales Down in January</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/28/pending-home-sales-down-in-january/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19861633/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/28/pending-home-sales-down-in-january/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>foreclosures</category><category>home sales</category><category>housing</category><category>interest rates</category><category>inthenews</category><category>pending home sales</category><category>real estate</category><category>recession</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dollar General's Net Earnings Soar, Shares Fall]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/06/dollar-generals-q3-earnings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/06/dollar-generals-q3-earnings/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/06/dollar-generals-q3-earnings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/12/dollargenerallogo.jpg" alt="Dollar General (DG) logo" />Recessions are a good time for discount retailers. Dollar General (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/dollar-general-corporation/dg/nys">DG</a>) is a retailer of low priced goods, which are in demand during this period of high unemployment. Consumers have less to spend and gravitate to stores like Dollar General.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704156304576003091722400596.html?mod=WSJ_business_whatsNews"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a> (subscription required) reported that Dollar General's fiscal third-quarter profit rose to $128.1 million or 37 cents a share, up from $75 million or 24 cents a share a year earlier. Sales rose 10% to $3.22 billion and were 4.2% higher on a same-store basis. Compared to prior years, sales were up 13% and 9.2% respectively.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/06/dollar-generals-q3-earnings/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Dollar General's Net Earnings Soar, Shares Fall</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/06/dollar-generals-q3-earnings/">Dollar General's Net Earnings Soar, Shares Fall</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 06 Dec 2010 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/06/dollar-generals-q3-earnings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19747749/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/06/dollar-generals-q3-earnings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DG</category><category>discount stores</category><category>Dollar General</category><category>Dollar General earnings</category><category>featured</category><category>frugal consumers</category><category>inthenews</category><category>recession</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fewer Small Business Start-Ups Mean Fewer Jobs]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/21/fewer-new-businesses-mean-fewer-jobs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/21/fewer-new-businesses-mean-fewer-jobs/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/21/fewer-new-businesses-mean-fewer-jobs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/small-business/" rel="tag">Small Business</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/06/economyjoblessclaims.06e8c18970d341d59b607c74596d39fa.jpg" alt="job seeker" />Fewer business start-ups are being launched, reports the the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704648604575621061892216250.html?mod=WSJ_hps_sections_smallbusiness"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a>. The Labor Department said that the number of companies with at least one employee fell by 100,000, or 2%, in the year ended March 31. That was the second worst performance in 18 years -- the worst one was a drop of 3.4% the previous year.</p>
<p>Why are these numbers important? In past recessions small business start-ups were the key to spurring the economy. In the three quarters that ended in March, newly formed companies created only 2.6 million jobs, 15% fewer than in the first three quarters of the last recovery.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/21/fewer-new-businesses-mean-fewer-jobs/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fewer Small Business Start-Ups Mean Fewer Jobs</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/21/fewer-new-businesses-mean-fewer-jobs/">Fewer Small Business Start-Ups Mean Fewer Jobs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 21 Nov 2010 11:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/21/fewer-new-businesses-mean-fewer-jobs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19727228/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/21/fewer-new-businesses-mean-fewer-jobs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>business start-ups</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>employment</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>recession</category><category>small business</category><category>venture capital</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2010 11:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comfort Zone Investing: Why the Next Rally Could Be a Monster]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/02/comfort-zone-investing-why-the-next-rally-could-be-a-monster/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/02/comfort-zone-investing-why-the-next-rally-could-be-a-monster/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/02/comfort-zone-investing-why-the-next-rally-could-be-a-monster/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/comfort-zone-investing/" rel="tag">Comfort Zone Investing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/10/wall-st.-bull.spencer-platt.getty-1286028715.jpg"  alt="Wall Street bull" />While the stock market has moved up nicely in the last three months, it's hardly moved stocks above reasonable valuations. IBM (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM</a>) sells at 12.77 times earnings. Intel (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">INTC</a>) goes for 11.67 times. Microsoft (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) has a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) of 11.74. Google (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) sports one of 22.8, but even that isn't too noteworthy when many of these stocks at one time or another traded at 50 to 100 times their earnings. Of course, those were days when there was only up, and everyone was on Ecstasy. Thankfully, every stock, and everyone, is back on earth.</p>
<p>Those relatively benign valuations come from the reality of a slow global <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/category/economy/" class="inlinked">economy</a>. In the U.S. it's more like a smashed-into-a-brick-wall economy. No matter the degree of the economic slowdown, all investors are cautious, not willing to bid up stocks when they believe things will only get worse, that profits will only decrease.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/02/comfort-zone-investing-why-the-next-rally-could-be-a-monster/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Comfort Zone Investing: Why the Next Rally Could Be a Monster</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/02/comfort-zone-investing-why-the-next-rally-could-be-a-monster/">Comfort Zone Investing: Why the Next Rally Could Be a Monster</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 02 Oct 2010 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/02/comfort-zone-investing-why-the-next-rally-could-be-a-monster/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19653977/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/02/comfort-zone-investing-why-the-next-rally-could-be-a-monster/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Comfort Zone Investing</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>featured</category><category>recession</category><category>stock market rally</category><category>stocks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Allrich]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2010 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Household Wealth Falls by $1.5 Trillion in Q2]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/21/household-wealth-falls-in-q2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/21/household-wealth-falls-in-q2/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/21/household-wealth-falls-in-q2/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p>The Federal Reserve has posted some data that shows the extent of economic decline in the second quarter. Here are some key numbers, as reported by <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE68G3NT20100917">Reuters</a>.</p>
<ul>
    <li>Household wealth fell by $1.5 trillion in the second quarter to $53.5 trillion. This sharply lower than the $64.2 trillion at the end of 2007.</li>
    <li>Stock losses amounted to $14.9 trillion, a drop of $1.95 trillion.</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/21/household-wealth-falls-in-q2/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Household Wealth Falls by $1.5 Trillion in Q2</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/21/household-wealth-falls-in-q2/">Household Wealth Falls by $1.5 Trillion in Q2</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/21/household-wealth-falls-in-q2/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19642344/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/21/household-wealth-falls-in-q2/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer debt</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>household wealth</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mortgage debt</category><category>poverty</category><category>recession</category><category>stimulus</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Silver Surges to a New Two-Year High]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/17/silver-surges-to-a-new-two-year-high/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/17/silver-surges-to-a-new-two-year-high/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/17/silver-surges-to-a-new-two-year-high/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/07/britainromancoins.jpg" alt="silver coins" />Silver has surged to $20.74, prices that haven't been seen since 1980, according to the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704394704575496243286593442.html"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a> (subscription required).</p>
<p>Let's take a walk down memory lane. Around 1979, the Hunt brothers from Texas tried to corner the silver market by buying up and hoarding tons of physical silver. That period also saw inflation rising to 18%. The Federal Reserve under Paul Volcker raised <a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/glossary/Short%20Term">short-term</a> rates to the 18% level.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/17/silver-surges-to-a-new-two-year-high/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Silver Surges to a New Two-Year High</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/17/silver-surges-to-a-new-two-year-high/">Silver Surges to a New Two-Year High</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/17/silver-surges-to-a-new-two-year-high/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19637471/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/17/silver-surges-to-a-new-two-year-high/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>gold</category><category>Hunt brothers</category><category>inflation</category><category>inthenews</category><category>recession</category><category>rule of 72</category><category>silver</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[O'Reilly Automotive: A Stock That's Right for the Times]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/09/o-reilly-automotive-right-for-the-times/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/09/o-reilly-automotive-right-for-the-times/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/09/o-reilly-automotive-right-for-the-times/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/oreilly-logo-240.jpg" alt="O'Reilly (ORLY) logo" />This is a market for boring stocks. By that I mean, given that objective economic events seem to diametrically alter the investing landscape every few days or so, you need a few "totally un-sexy" plays that perform despite the aforementioned tumult.</p>
<p>And auto parts giant O'Reilly Automotive (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/o-reilly-automotive-inc/orly/nas">ORLY</a>), which I first wrote about here <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/16/ride-the-used-car-repair-wave-with-o-reilly-automotive/#continued">on May 18, 2009</a> at a price of $37.02, fits the bill.</p>
<p>O'Reilly's 2010 revenue should increase 9% to 12%, including revenue from an acquisition. Same store sales should increase 5% to 7%. Margins will likely increase.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/09/o-reilly-automotive-right-for-the-times/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>O'Reilly Automotive: A Stock That's Right for the Times</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/09/o-reilly-automotive-right-for-the-times/">O'Reilly Automotive: A Stock That's Right for the Times</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 09 Sep 2010 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/09/o-reilly-automotive-right-for-the-times/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19627183/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/09/o-reilly-automotive-right-for-the-times/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>car maintenance</category><category>featured</category><category>OReilly Automotive</category><category>ORLY</category><category>recession</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Economic Struggles Continued in July]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/07/economic-struggles-continued-in-july/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/07/economic-struggles-continued-in-july/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/07/economic-struggles-continued-in-july/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p>I don't think I am breaking any news that you didn't expect, but the Associated Press announced that its monthly analysis of conditions around the country showed that <a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/article/ap-analysis-economic-pain-failed-to-ease/486584/">economic difficulties continued during July</a>. <br />
<p>The study showed that unemployment, foreclosure and bankruptcy rates didn't change when compared to June. In areas where the workforces are dependent upon agriculture, mining, wholesale trade, and finance, the economic stress eased. Unfortunately, retail and real estate employees saw higher distress during July. The study shows that roughly 54% of the 3,141 counties in the U.S. saw economic stress decline (24 of the 50 states).</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/07/economic-struggles-continued-in-july/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Economic Struggles Continued in July</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/07/economic-struggles-continued-in-july/">Economic Struggles Continued in July</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/07/economic-struggles-continued-in-july/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19623939/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/07/economic-struggles-continued-in-july/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Associated Press</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>inthenews</category><category>recession</category><category>retail</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. Lost Fewer Jobs Than Expected in August]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/03/us-lost-fewer-jobs-than-expected-in-august/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/03/us-lost-fewer-jobs-than-expected-in-august/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/03/us-lost-fewer-jobs-than-expected-in-august/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/california_unemployed.jpg" />The U.S. lost fewer jobs than expected in August. Here are <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/04/business/economy/04jobs.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business&amp;pagewanted=print">the key stats</a>, as reported in the <em>New York Times</em>:</p>
<ul>
    <li>The economy lost another 54,000 jobs last month.</li>
    <li>Private companies added 67,000 jobs.</li>
    <li>The unemployment rate rose to 9.6% from 9.5%.</li>
    <li>The government lost 121,000 jobs in August.</li>
    <li>State and local governments cut 10,000 jobs and another 114,000 temporary census positions.</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/03/us-lost-fewer-jobs-than-expected-in-august/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.S. Lost Fewer Jobs Than Expected in August</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/03/us-lost-fewer-jobs-than-expected-in-august/">U.S. Lost Fewer Jobs Than Expected in August</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/04/business/economy/04jobs.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business&amp;pagewanted=print>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/03/us-lost-fewer-jobs-than-expected-in-august/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19620413/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/03/us-lost-fewer-jobs-than-expected-in-august/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>job losses</category><category>recession</category><category>unemployment rate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Are We in a Recession or a Depression?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/02/a-recession-or-a-depression/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/02/a-recession-or-a-depression/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/02/a-recession-or-a-depression/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/08/crystalballdown.jpg" />Are we in a recession or a depression? A <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/glossary/Recession" class="inlinked">recession</a> usually means a temporary dip in an otherwise growing economy. A <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/glossary/Depression" class="inlinked">depression</a> is much worse, feeding on itself and dragging the <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/category/economy/" class="inlinked">economy</a> lower and lower. A recession carries hope. A depression is pure hopelessness.</p>
<p>We have all kinds of forecasts, from extreme optimism to bleak pessimism. Government officials and the mainstream media are touting this as a dip in a <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/glossary/Long-Term%20Growth,LTG" class="inlinked">long-term growth</a> cycle.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/02/a-recession-or-a-depression/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Are We in a Recession or a Depression?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/02/a-recession-or-a-depression/">Are We in a Recession or a Depression?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 02 Sep 2010 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/02/a-recession-or-a-depression/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19613072/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/02/a-recession-or-a-depression/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>David Rosenberg</category><category>depression</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>recession</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chasing Value: No Double-Dip Recession]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/01/chasing-value-no-double-dip-recession/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/01/chasing-value-no-double-dip-recession/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/01/chasing-value-no-double-dip-recession/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfc/" rel="tag">Wells Fargo (WFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bargain-stocks/" rel="tag">Bargain Stocks</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/" rel="tag">Chasing Value[TM]</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tef/" rel="tag">Telefonica SA (TEF)</a></p><img hspace="4" height="160" border="1" align="right" width="257" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/08/hd-04-28-10.jpg" alt="" />The most common question I get from friends, family, business associates and, well, everyone is -- Do you expect a double-dip recession? My answer is an unequivocal "No!"<br />
<br />
This does not mean that I think we are going to experience a dramatic improvement in the economy. We are not. Many of my colleagues seem to oppose my view, so it is not without some trepidation that I take this stand. However, I see the glass half full. My view is that others are overly influenced by "group-think" and the calls of doom. <br />
<br />
I do think that we are currently adrift in uncharted waters and we may have a faulty rudder, too. The biggest fear I have is that everyone jabbering about another deep recession may actually cause one. <br />
<br />
The following supports why I feel, from what we know, that we are not destined for a double-dip recession:<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/01/chasing-value-no-double-dip-recession/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chasing Value: No Double-Dip Recession</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/01/chasing-value-no-double-dip-recession/">Chasing Value: No Double-Dip Recession</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 01 Sep 2010 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/01/chasing-value-no-double-dip-recession/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19612687/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/01/chasing-value-no-double-dip-recession/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AIG</category><category>american international group</category><category>BAC</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>C</category><category>Case-Shiller</category><category>Chasing Value</category><category>citigroup</category><category>debate</category><category>debt</category><category>deficit spending</category><category>double dip recession</category><category>featured</category><category>GenerlaMotors</category><category>gm</category><category>JP Morgan</category><category>JPM</category><category>National Debt</category><category>recession</category><category>TEF</category><category>telefonica</category><category>wells fargo</category><category>WFC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Canadian Pacific Railway: Slowing Economy Dictates Caution]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/30/canadian-pacific-railway/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/30/canadian-pacific-railway/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/30/canadian-pacific-railway/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/cp-logo-240.jpg" alt="Canadian Pacific (CP) logo" />Like Warren Buffett, I like the rails. Canadian Pacific Railway (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/canadian-pacific-railway-limited/cp/nys">CP</a>), which <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/01/canadian-pacific-northern-runs-northern-profits/">I first discussed</a> here on May 1, 2009, at a price of $37.47, fits the bill, despite the stock's side-ways action summer.</p>
<p>Look for Canadian Pacific to register an impressive 7% to 10% revenue increase in 2010, as end markets continue to recover from 2009 lows. Meanwhile, increases in CP's railroad efficiency add to the positive story.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/30/canadian-pacific-railway/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Canadian Pacific Railway: Slowing Economy Dictates Caution</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/30/canadian-pacific-railway/">Canadian Pacific Railway: Slowing Economy Dictates Caution</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/30/canadian-pacific-railway/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19613220/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/30/canadian-pacific-railway/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Canadian Pacific Railway</category><category>CP</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>featured</category><category>rail stocks</category><category>recession</category><category>Warren Buffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New Home Sales Fall to Record Low in July]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/25/new-home-sales-fall-to-record-low-in-july/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/25/new-home-sales-fall-to-record-low-in-july/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/25/new-home-sales-fall-to-record-low-in-july/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="new home sales" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/02/manor.jpg" />Wednesday morning got off to a slow start for the market as a whole, and the July home sales report didn't going to help matters much. According to the Commerce Department, <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/glossary/New%20Home%20Sales" class="inlinked">new home sales</a> plummeted <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/real-estate/new-home-sales-slip-12-4-in-july/19607515/" target="_blank">12.4% in July</a> compared to June.</p>
<p>The drop brings the seasonally adjusted annual sales pace to 276,600, far short of the expected pace of 330,000. Not only is this pace short of the expected result, but it is the slowest pace on record, which dates back to 1963.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/25/new-home-sales-fall-to-record-low-in-july/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>New Home Sales Fall to Record Low in July</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/25/new-home-sales-fall-to-record-low-in-july/">New Home Sales Fall to Record Low in July</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 25 Aug 2010 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/25/new-home-sales-fall-to-record-low-in-july/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19607536/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/25/new-home-sales-fall-to-record-low-in-july/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>durable goods</category><category>durable goods orders</category><category>economic data</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>home sales</category><category>inthenews</category><category>new home sales</category><category>recession</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Existing Home Sales Plunge]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/24/existing-home-sales-plunge-27/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/24/existing-home-sales-plunge-27/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/24/existing-home-sales-plunge-27/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/foreclosurebig.jpg"  alt="" />The big story today is about housing. It is not good. <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-08-24/sales-of-u-s-existing-homes-drop-more-than-estimated-to-3-83-million-rate.html">Existing home sales plunged 27% in July</a>, according to a Bloomberg News survey.<br />
<br />
That news wrecked havoc with the markets. The Dow was down over 100 points. On the bright side, US treasuries roared ahead to the lowest yields on record. The yield on the benchmark 10 year note fell to 2.49%. The yield on the two year note is at .4542%. Yes, you read it right. It is less that half of one percent.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/24/existing-home-sales-plunge-27/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Existing Home Sales Plunge</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/24/existing-home-sales-plunge-27/">Existing Home Sales Plunge</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 24 Aug 2010 18:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-08-24/sales-of-u-s-existing-homes-drop-more-than-estimated-to-3-83-million-rate.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/24/existing-home-sales-plunge-27/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19606648/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/24/existing-home-sales-plunge-27/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>double dip recession</category><category>existing home sales</category><category>existing home sales plunge 27 percent</category><category>inthenews</category><category>real estate</category><category>RealEstate</category><category>recession</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 18:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Recession Was Deeper Than Previously Reported]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/02/recession-deeper-than-previously-reported/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/02/recession-deeper-than-previously-reported/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/02/recession-deeper-than-previously-reported/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/commercedept.jpg" alt="" />The Commerce Department's Bureau of Economic Analysis said Friday that it <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-07-30/recession-in-america-was-even-worse-than-estimated-revisions-to-data-show.html">revised its statistics on the U.S. recession</a>. Its revisions were nearly all made downward, meaning that the recession was worse than first reported.</p>
<p>Here are some examples:</p>
<ul>
    <li>From the fourth quarter of 2007 to the second quarter of 2009 our economy shrank 4.1%, compared with the 3.7% previously reported.</li>
    <li>Household spending fell 1.2% in 2009, twice as much as previously projected.</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/02/recession-deeper-than-previously-reported/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Recession Was Deeper Than Previously Reported</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/02/recession-deeper-than-previously-reported/">Recession Was Deeper Than Previously Reported</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 02 Aug 2010 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/02/recession-deeper-than-previously-reported/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19574809/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/02/recession-deeper-than-previously-reported/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Department of Commerce</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>GDP</category><category>inthenews</category><category>recession</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Economy Is Doomed! Now What?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/01/economy-is-doomed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/01/economy-is-doomed/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/01/economy-is-doomed/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hpq/" rel="tag">Hewlett-Packard (HPQ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvx/" rel="tag">Chevron Corp (CVX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ma/" rel="tag">MasterCard Inc'A' (MA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/v/" rel="tag">Visa Inc. (V)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/02/fear.jpg" alt="" />It seems as if everyone is worried about the economy going into a <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/7919706/Double-dip-feared-as-US-economic-growth-loses-pace.html">double-dip recession</a> these days. Worry in and of itself can be very destructive, both to your mental state and to the economy overall. Besides pulling out your hair, causing acid reflux and other health problems, worry can actually become self-fulfilling prophecy and cause the very thing you are most afraid of.</p>
<p>A number of years ago when I read Dale Carnegie's book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/How-Stop-Worrying-Start-Living/dp/0671733354"><em>How to Stop Worrying and Start Living</em></a>, one method he suggested was just to accept the worst case scenario and then move on with life from there.</p>
<p>So accept it: THE ECONOMY IS DOOMED! it's going to be 10 years of economic nightmare!</p>
<p>Now what?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/01/economy-is-doomed/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Economy Is Doomed! Now What?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/01/economy-is-doomed/">The Economy Is Doomed! Now What?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 01 Aug 2010 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/01/economy-is-doomed/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19576397/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/01/economy-is-doomed/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>America is great</category><category>CVX</category><category>Dale Carnegie</category><category>debt</category><category>diversification</category><category>economic survival</category><category>economy</category><category>education</category><category>featured</category><category>GDP</category><category>GE</category><category>GOOG</category><category>HPQ</category><category>innovation</category><category>MA</category><category>PG</category><category>recession</category><category>V</category><category>XOM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Kersten]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comfort Zone Investing: Unconventional Thinking Needed]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/31/comfort-zone-investing-unconventional-thinking-needed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/31/comfort-zone-investing-unconventional-thinking-needed/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/31/comfort-zone-investing-unconventional-thinking-needed/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/comfort-zone-investing/" rel="tag">Comfort Zone Investing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/07/stocks.trader.bad.scott-olson.getty-images.jpg" alt="Comfort Zone Investing: Unconventional Thinking Needed" />This recession is very different from any since the Depression. Normal events just aren't happening, ones like a rebound in housing prices, shorter unemployment periods, interest rates bouncing back. The severity of the economic slowdown continues to grind on, and investors who thought along the lines of a "normal" recovery have been disappointed so far as there's nothing normal happening.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/31/comfort-zone-investing-unconventional-thinking-needed/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Comfort Zone Investing: Unconventional Thinking Needed</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/31/comfort-zone-investing-unconventional-thinking-needed/">Comfort Zone Investing: Unconventional Thinking Needed</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 31 Jul 2010 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/31/comfort-zone-investing-unconventional-thinking-needed/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19571889/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/31/comfort-zone-investing-unconventional-thinking-needed/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Comfort Zone Investing</category><category>economic indicators</category><category>featured</category><category>Housing</category><category>low interest rates</category><category>Recession</category><category>Recession different from others</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Allrich]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
