<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Spokesperson fiasco #14: Slowhand pukes on Michelob]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/19/spokesperson-fisacos-14-slowhand-pukes-on-michelob/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/19/spokesperson-fisacos-14-slowhand-pukes-on-michelob/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/19/spokesperson-fisacos-14-slowhand-pukes-on-michelob/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/atvi/" rel="tag">Activision Inc (ATVI)</a></p><p><em>This post is part of a series on celebrity spokespeople who ended up doing serious harm to the brands they were hired to promote, or vice versa. See how we rank the 20 top spokesperson fiascos.</em></p>
<p><img  alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/endorsement-eric-clapton-200cs071508.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />In 1987, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anheuser-busch-companies-inc/bud/nys">Anheuser-Busch</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anheuser-busch-companies-inc/bud/nys">BUD</a>) was featuring renown musicians such as Stevie Winwood and Phil Collins in a "The Night Belongs to Michelob" ad campaign. I'm sure the ad hacks in charge thought they'd had a stroke of genius when they conceived of using <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Clapton">Eric "Slowhand" Clapton</a>, performing <a href="http://www.retrojunk.com/details_commercial/6626/">his hit "After Midnight", as part of the series</a>. 1 a.m., guitar god, and Michelob; seems like a natural, right?</p>
<p>I can't help but think that someone should have checked on Clapton's habits before launching the ad. Having fought well-publicized heroin addiction and a taste for cocaine, Clapton revealed to <a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2005/10/17/8358063/index.htm">Rolling Stone that at the time of the ad's release he was in a detox facility</a>. Battling alcoholism. His nights belonged to imaginary snakes rather than dirty-dancing runway models.</p>
<p>My suggestion? I'd steer clear of junkies as spokespersons, unless I was selling needles, smack or size 0 dresses. The image of spokespeople puking their guts out doesn't make me yearn for a beer.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/top-celebrity-spokesperson-fiascos">Read the entire series</a></em><br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/19/spokesperson-fisacos-14-slowhand-pukes-on-michelob/">Spokesperson fiasco #14: Slowhand pukes on Michelob</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 19 Jul 2008 07:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/19/spokesperson-fisacos-14-slowhand-pukes-on-michelob/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1256351/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/19/spokesperson-fisacos-14-slowhand-pukes-on-michelob/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>after midnight</category><category>AfterMidnight</category><category>anheuser-busch</category><category>eric clapton</category><category>EricClapton</category><category>michelob</category><category>rock star</category><category>rock star spokespersons</category><category>RockStar</category><category>RockStarSpokespersons</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Barlow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 07:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Energy drinks? Coffee, please]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/07/energy-drinks-coffee-please/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/07/energy-drinks-coffee-please/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/07/energy-drinks-coffee-please/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ko/" rel="tag">Coca-Cola (KO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pep/" rel="tag">PepsiCo (PEP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hans/" rel="tag">Hansen Natural (HANS)</a></p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/aol-fly-logo.gif" alt="" /></a>A study in the September <em><a href="http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/food/beverages/energy-drinks/energy-drinks-9-07/overview/0709_drink_ov.htm">Consumer Reports </a></em>(subscription required) shows that the amount of caffeine found in eight ounces of 12 popular energy drinks ranged from 50 to135mg, with most in the 75 to 80mg range, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/healthNews/idUSN0642861920070806">reports <em>Reuters</em></a>. That compares to the amount of caffeine in an eight ounce cup of coffee, which ranged from 65 to 120mg, with an average of 85mg, says the National Coffee Association. <br /> <br />The study attempts to surprise consumers by proving that many energy drinks have the same caffeine as a similar cup of coffee. What the study didn't highlight, according to <em>Reuters</em>, was exactly how many energy drinks and coffee people consume during a typical day. The likelihood of people drinking only eight ounces of an energy drink, or coffee, is absurdly low. <br /> <br />Visit any <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starbucks-corporation/sbux/nas">Starbucks </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starbucks-corporation/sbux/nas">SBUX</a>) or 7-11 store, and consumers will notice that the smallest size cup in most franchises is 12 ounces, and the largest, 24 ounces. Only Dunkin Donuts provides coffee-drinkers with a smaller version.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/07/energy-drinks-coffee-please/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Energy drinks? Coffee, please</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/07/energy-drinks-coffee-please/">Energy drinks? Coffee, please</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 07 Aug 2007 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/healthNews/idUSN0642861920070806>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/07/energy-drinks-coffee-please/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/959755/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/07/energy-drinks-coffee-please/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>amp</category><category>caffine</category><category>coca-cola</category><category>coffee</category><category>energy drink</category><category>energy pro</category><category>EnergyDrink</category><category>EnergyPro</category><category>full throttle</category><category>FullThrottle</category><category>hans</category><category>hansen</category><category>ko</category><category>no fear</category><category>NoFear</category><category>pep</category><category>pepsi</category><category>red bull</category><category>RedBull</category><category>rockstar</category><category>rush</category><category>sbux</category><category>sobe</category><category>starbucks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Shult]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Britain bans sales of Take-Two's Manhunt 2, but what's next?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/20/britain-bans-sales-of-take-twos-manhunt-2-but-whats-next/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/20/britain-bans-sales-of-take-twos-manhunt-2-but-whats-next/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/20/britain-bans-sales-of-take-twos-manhunt-2-but-whats-next/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a></p><img align="right" src="http://www.rockstargames.com/manhunt2/images/manhunt2.jpg" alt="" style="width: 274px; height: 114px;" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/take-two-interactive-software-inc/ttwo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Take Two Interactive's</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/take-two-interactive-software-inc/ttwo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">TTWO</a>) Rockstar Games <a href="http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/06/19/ap3836732.html">was expected to release its latest game</a>, <span style="font-style: italic;">Manhunt 2</span>, on July 10 for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nintendo-co-ltd-adr/ntdoy/nao?tabs=quotesandnews">Nintendo's</a> (OTC: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nintendo-co-ltd-adr/ntdoy/nao?tabs=quotesandnews">NTDOY</a>) Wii and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Sony Corporation's </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">SNE</a>) PlayStation 2 consoles. However, Britain, America's friendly Democratic neighbor, has banned sales for -- get this -- "unremitting bleakness and callousness of tone."<br /><br />I think that is how my mother referred to my dress code back in high school.<br /><br />The banning comes after a 14-year old British schoolboy was murdered by a friend, Warren Leglanc, age 17. The parents of the schoolboy blamed a video game for their son's death. Patric Pakeerah, the father of the murdered boy, welcomed the decision, <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/leicestershire/3936597.stm">saying</a> "It's a video instruction on how to murder somebody; it just shows how you kill people and what weapons you use."<br /><br />I'd hate to see if Mr. Pakeerah ever watched prime-time television. Or the news, for that matter.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/20/britain-bans-sales-of-take-twos-manhunt-2-but-whats-next/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Britain bans sales of Take-Two's Manhunt 2, but what's next?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/20/britain-bans-sales-of-take-twos-manhunt-2-but-whats-next/">Britain bans sales of Take-Two's Manhunt 2, but what's next?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 20 Jun 2007 17:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.forbes.com/fdc/welcome_mjx.shtml>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/20/britain-bans-sales-of-take-twos-manhunt-2-but-whats-next/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/922557/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/20/britain-bans-sales-of-take-twos-manhunt-2-but-whats-next/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>britain</category><category>law</category><category>leglanc</category><category>manhunt</category><category>murder</category><category>nintendo</category><category>ntdoy</category><category>pakeerah</category><category>playstation</category><category>ps2</category><category>rockstar</category><category>sne</category><category>sony</category><category>take two</category><category>take-two</category><category>TakeTwo</category><category>ttwo</category><category>video game</category><category>VideoGame</category><category>wii</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Shult]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 17:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Lawsuit against cancer-causing cola allowed to go forward]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/lawsuit-against-cancer-causing-cola-allowed-to-go-forward/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/lawsuit-against-cancer-causing-cola-allowed-to-go-forward/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/lawsuit-against-cancer-causing-cola-allowed-to-go-forward/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ko/" rel="tag">Coca-Cola (KO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pep/" rel="tag">PepsiCo (PEP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><p>A Kansas federal court has ruled that <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118046358777417446.html">a lawsuit accusing soft drink makers</a> of selling drinks made with ingredients that can form cancer-causing benzen can go forward. The lawsuit asks that makers remove the drinks from stores, change the recipe, and offer refunds to customers who bought them.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-coca-cola-company/ko/nys">Coca Cola Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-coca-cola-company/ko/nys">KO</a>) had been a defendant, but settled earlier this month, offering refunds and reformulating the soda. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pepsico-inc/pep/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">PepsiCo Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pepsico-inc/pep/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">PEP</a>) said the suit is without merit, and other defendants include Sunny Delight and Rockstar.</p>
<p>Here's what I don't understand: If the drinks really can cause cancer, shouldn't customers be entitled to a little bit more than a refund? It seems bizarre that all that the plaintiffs want is a refund. The soda companies involved have not conceded that their products can cause cancer.</p>
<p>The relatively minor requests (refunds and new formula) make this suit a pretty insignificant risk for shareholders in the companies.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/lawsuit-against-cancer-causing-cola-allowed-to-go-forward/">Lawsuit against cancer-causing cola allowed to go forward</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 30 May 2007 20:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118046358777417446.html?mod=todays_us_marketplace>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/lawsuit-against-cancer-causing-cola-allowed-to-go-forward/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/907290/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/lawsuit-against-cancer-causing-cola-allowed-to-go-forward/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>benzen</category><category>Cancer</category><category>Coca-Cola</category><category>Coke</category><category>Health</category><category>KO</category><category>Lawsuit</category><category>PEP</category><category>Pepsi</category><category>Pepsico</category><category>refunds</category><category>Rockstar</category><category>Soft Drinks</category><category>SoftDrinks</category><category>Sunny Delight</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 20:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
