<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Buyout Buzz Inspires Bullish KeyCorp Spread]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/03/buyout-buzz-inspires-bullish-keycorp-spread/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/03/buyout-buzz-inspires-bullish-keycorp-spread/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/03/buyout-buzz-inspires-bullish-keycorp-spread/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p>Option volume has ramped up today on KeyCorp (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/keycorp-new/key/nys">KEY</a>), with activity rising well beyond the usual level on both the call and put side of the tape. Taking a closer look at some of the major block trades on this regional banking issue, it appears that a single spread strategist is responsible for a healthy portion of this option volume.</p>
<p>Specifically, the trader purchased a block of 10,000 June 10 calls for $0.50 each, and simultaneously sold 10,000 June 8 puts for $0.25 each. The result was a net debit of $0.25 per pair of contracts -- which means the speculator can begin collecting profits on those purchased calls if <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/keycorp-new/key/nys" class="inlinked">KEY</a> rallies beyond $10.25 by June expiration.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/03/buyout-buzz-inspires-bullish-keycorp-spread/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Buyout Buzz Inspires Bullish KeyCorp Spread</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/03/buyout-buzz-inspires-bullish-keycorp-spread/">Buyout Buzz Inspires Bullish KeyCorp Spread</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 03 Mar 2011 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/03/buyout-buzz-inspires-bullish-keycorp-spread/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19867064/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/03/buyout-buzz-inspires-bullish-keycorp-spread/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bullish</category><category>buyout</category><category>calls</category><category>inthenews</category><category>KEY</category><category>KeyCorp</category><category>mergers and acquisitions</category><category>options</category><category>puts</category><category>rumors</category><category>speculation</category><category>synthetic long</category><category>TD</category><category>Toronto-Dominion Bank</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Borders Nears Possible Bankruptcy Filing]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/02/borders-nears-possible-bankruptcy-filing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/02/borders-nears-possible-bankruptcy-filing/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/02/borders-nears-possible-bankruptcy-filing/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="Borders (BGP) store"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/10/borders-1286310735.jpg" />Rumors have been circulating for almost a month about Borders' (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/borders-group-inc/bgp/nys">BGP</a>) possible bankruptcy filing. People familiar with the situation told <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704358704576118614051160274.html?mod=WSJ_business_whatsNews"><em>The Wall Street Journal</em></a> that the filing could come as early as the middle of this month.</p>
<p>Borders has been trying to hold off the filing by delaying payments to vendors. But this is only temporary. Now the matter has reached a critical stage. The company has obtained about $500 million to $550 million in debtor in possession financing that would keep the company operating after a court filing.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/02/borders-nears-possible-bankruptcy-filing/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Borders Nears Possible Bankruptcy Filing</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/02/borders-nears-possible-bankruptcy-filing/">Borders Nears Possible Bankruptcy Filing</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 02 Feb 2011 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/02/borders-nears-possible-bankruptcy-filing/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19824631/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/02/borders-nears-possible-bankruptcy-filing/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bankruptcy</category><category>barnes and noble</category><category>bgp</category><category>bks</category><category>borders</category><category>Borders bankruptcy</category><category>Borders closing</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>rumors</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Boeing Could Be Facing Even More 787 Delays]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/08/boeing-could-be-facing-even-more-787-delays/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/08/boeing-could-be-facing-even-more-787-delays/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/08/boeing-could-be-facing-even-more-787-delays/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ba/" rel="tag">Boeing Co (BA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/blue-boeing-logo-240.jpg"  alt="Boeing (BA) logo" />Boeing (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys" target="_blank">BA</a> - <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys/option-chains" target="_blank">option chain</a>) stock is trading lower today on conflicting reports about the company's timeline for the debut of its highly-anticipated, but much-delayed 787 Dreamliner. Aviation Week published a report late Friday that the company has told several customers that <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/boeing-says-787-delay-10-more-months-report-2010-11-06?siteid=aolRss" target="_blank">delivery of its 787 Dreamliner will be delayed by up to 10 months</a>, but Boeing <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN059996520101105?feedType=RSS&amp;feedName=marketsNews&amp;rpc=33" target="_blank">denies this report, saying it intends to meet the current delivery date of Q1 2011</a>. If you think this stock won't be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on BA.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/08/boeing-could-be-facing-even-more-787-delays/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Boeing Could Be Facing Even More 787 Delays</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/08/boeing-could-be-facing-even-more-787-delays/">Boeing Could Be Facing Even More 787 Delays</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 08 Nov 2010 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/08/boeing-could-be-facing-even-more-787-delays/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19707652/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/08/boeing-could-be-facing-even-more-787-delays/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>787</category><category>BA</category><category>Boeing</category><category>Dreamliner</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>options</category><category>rumors</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[EMC Lifted by Buyout Rumors]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/14/emc-lifted-by-buyout-rumors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/14/emc-lifted-by-buyout-rumors/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/14/emc-lifted-by-buyout-rumors/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/orcl/" rel="tag">Oracle Corp (ORCL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/emc/" rel="tag">EMC Corp (EMC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/emc-logo-240.jpg"  alt="EMC logo" />EMC (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/emc-corporation-mass/emc/nys">EMC</a> - <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/emc-corporation-mass/emc/nys/option-chains">option chain</a>) shares are rising today as rumors are swirling that Oracle (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/oracle-corporation/orcl/nas">ORCL</a>) <a href="http://www.totaltele.com/view.aspx?ID=459407" target="_blank">might be interested in buying EMC</a>. This speculation pushed EMC higher by as much as 6% earlier this morning, but the stock's price has settled down some now. If you think that the stock won't fall by too much in the coming months, then now could be a good time to look at a bullish hedged trade on EMC.<br />
<br />
EMC opened this morning at $20.94. So far today the stock has hit a low of $20.75 and a high of $21.58. As of 12:25, EMC is trading at $21.06 up 0.76 (3.7%). The chart for EMC looks bullish and <a href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline" target="_blank">S&amp;P</a> gives EMC a positive 5 STARS (out of 5) strong buy ranking.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/14/emc-lifted-by-buyout-rumors/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>EMC Lifted by Buyout Rumors</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/14/emc-lifted-by-buyout-rumors/">EMC Lifted by Buyout Rumors</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/14/emc-lifted-by-buyout-rumors/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19674320/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/14/emc-lifted-by-buyout-rumors/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>buyout</category><category>EMC</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>options</category><category>Oracle</category><category>ORCL</category><category>rumors</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Qualcomm Rises on Apple Rumors]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/30/qualcomm-rises-on-apple-rumors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/30/qualcomm-rises-on-apple-rumors/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/30/qualcomm-rises-on-apple-rumors/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/qcom/" rel="tag">QUALCOMM Inc (QCOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.qualcomm.com/investor/index.html"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="QCOM logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/qualcomm-qcom-logo.gif" /></a>Qualcomm (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/qualcomm-incorporated/qcom/nas">QCOM</a> - <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/qualcomm-incorporated/qcom/nas/option-chains">option chain</a>) shares are rising today on rumors that Apple (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) has <a target="_blank" href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/10/09/29/apple_will_use_baseband_from_cdma_giant_for_iphone_5_and_ipad_2_report.html">decided to use chips made by QCOM in its fifth-generation iPhone and second-generation iPad devices</a>. If you think that the stock won't fall by too much in the coming months, then now could be a good time to look at a bullish hedged trade on QCOM.<br />
<br />
QCOM opened this morning at $45.07. So far today the stock has hit a low of $44.77 and a high of $45.61. As of 12:25, QCOM is trading at $45.28 up 0.97 (2.2%). The chart for QCOM looks bullish and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline">S&amp;P</a> gives QCOM a positive 4 STARS (out of 5) buy ranking.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/30/qualcomm-rises-on-apple-rumors/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Qualcomm Rises on Apple Rumors</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/30/qualcomm-rises-on-apple-rumors/">Qualcomm Rises on Apple Rumors</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/30/qualcomm-rises-on-apple-rumors/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19655628/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/30/qualcomm-rises-on-apple-rumors/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>apple</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>iPad</category><category>iPod</category><category>options</category><category>QCOM</category><category>Qualcomm</category><category>rumors</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dean Foods Takeover Speculation Resumes]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/01/dean-foods-takeover-speculation-resumes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/01/dean-foods-takeover-speculation-resumes/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/01/dean-foods-takeover-speculation-resumes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/df/" rel="tag">Dean Foods (DF)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.deanfoods.com/our-company/investor-relations.aspx"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="DF logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/dean-foods-df-logo.jpg" /></a>Dean Foods (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/dean-foods-company/df/nys">DF</a> - <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/dean-foods-company/df/nys/option-chains">option chain</a>) shares are up a significant amount for the second consecutive day after <a target="_blank" href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-08-31/dean-foods-advances-on-speculation-danone-will-make-an-offer.html">rumors resurfaced that Groupe Danone SA could be investigating an acquisition of the company</a>. This rumor first came to light <a target="_blank" href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-03-05/dean-foods-shares-call-options-surge-on-takeover-speculation.html">back in March</a>, but since then DF has seen its share price cut by a third, which could make the company even more attractive now. If you think that the stock won't fall by too much in the coming months, then now could be a good time to look at a bullish hedged trade on DF.<br />
<br />
DF opened this morning at $10.55 So far today the stock has hit a low of $10.50 and a high of $10.75. As of 12:15, DF is trading at $10.63 up 0.41 (4.0%). The chart for DF looks neutral and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline">S&amp;P</a> gives DF a neutral 3 STARS (out of 5) hold ranking.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/01/dean-foods-takeover-speculation-resumes/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Dean Foods Takeover Speculation Resumes</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/01/dean-foods-takeover-speculation-resumes/">Dean Foods Takeover Speculation Resumes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://Dean Foods Takeover Speculation>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/01/dean-foods-takeover-speculation-resumes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19617009/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/01/dean-foods-takeover-speculation-resumes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>deals</category><category>Dean Foods</category><category>DF</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>options</category><category>rumors</category><category>takeover</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Genzyme Lifted by Takeover Speculation]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/29/genzyme-lifted-by-takeover-speculation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/29/genzyme-lifted-by-takeover-speculation/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/29/genzyme-lifted-by-takeover-speculation/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/genz/" rel="tag">Genzyme (GENZ)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/genzyme-logo.jpg" />Genzyme (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/genzyme-corporation-genzyme-corporation-common-stock/genz/nas">GENZ</a> - <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/genzyme-corporation-genzyme-corporation-common-stock/genz/nas/option-chains">option chain</a>) shares are rising today on a report in the Wall Street Journal which says that Sanofi-Aventis SA (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/sanofi-aventis-sa/sny/nys">SNY</a>) could make a <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN2822661220100728">formal takeover offer to GENZ's board that could be worth about $20 billion</a>. SNY declined to comment on the report. If you think that the stock won't fall by too much in the coming months, then now could be a good time to look at a bullish hedged trade on GENZ.<br />
<br />
GENZ opened this morning at $70.31. So far today the stock has hit a low of $69.97 and a high of $70.97. As of 11:55, GENZ is trading at $70.09 up $2.09 (3.1%). The chart for GENZ looks bullish and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline">S&amp;P</a> gives GENZ a positive 4 STARS (out of 5) buy ranking.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/29/genzyme-lifted-by-takeover-speculation/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Genzyme Lifted by Takeover Speculation</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/29/genzyme-lifted-by-takeover-speculation/">Genzyme Lifted by Takeover Speculation</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/29/genzyme-lifted-by-takeover-speculation/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19573558/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/29/genzyme-lifted-by-takeover-speculation/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>deal</category><category>GENZ</category><category>Genzyme</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>options</category><category>rumors</category><category>Sanofi-Aventis</category><category>SNY</category><category>takeover</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple Stock Higher Amid Rumors of a New Product]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/28/apple-stock-higher-amid-rumors-of-a-new-product/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/28/apple-stock-higher-amid-rumors-of-a-new-product/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/28/apple-stock-higher-amid-rumors-of-a-new-product/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/apple-store-200.jpg" />On the final trading session before Christmas, Apple, Inc. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/aapl/nys" target="_blank">AAPL</a>) shares hit an all-time high thanks to a published report hinting that another product announcement may be rolling in. On December 23, the <em>Financial Times</em> reported on its Tech Blog that Apple "<a href="http://blogs.ft.com/techblog/2009/12/exclusive-apple-to-host-event-in-january/" target="_blank">has something big up its sleeve for next month</a>."</p>
<p>The main reason for this speculation is that the tech company has booked a stage at the Yerba Buena Center for the Arts (YBCA) in San Francisco for "several days in late January." Apple has used this venue to make major announcements in the past, and the speculation is that Apple is going to make a major product announcement at the end of January. The blog quoted Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster as saying, "We believe there is a 75 per cent likelihood that Apple will have an event in January and a 50 per cent chance that it will be held to launch the Apple Tablet."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/28/apple-stock-higher-amid-rumors-of-a-new-product/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Apple Stock Higher Amid Rumors of a New Product</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/28/apple-stock-higher-amid-rumors-of-a-new-product/">Apple Stock Higher Amid Rumors of a New Product</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 28 Dec 2009 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/28/apple-stock-higher-amid-rumors-of-a-new-product/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19295456/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/28/apple-stock-higher-amid-rumors-of-a-new-product/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>apple innovation</category><category>AppleInnovation</category><category>featured</category><category>Financial</category><category>Financial Times</category><category>FinancialTimes</category><category>new apple product</category><category>new tech</category><category>new technology</category><category>NewAppleProduct</category><category>NewTech</category><category>NewTechnology</category><category>rumors</category><category>tech</category><category>technology</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[A New Entry into Sports Reporting: TMZ?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/28/a-new-entry-into-sports-reporting-tmz/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/28/a-new-entry-into-sports-reporting-tmz/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/28/a-new-entry-into-sports-reporting-tmz/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aol/" rel="tag">AOL (AOL)</a></p><p><img  border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/tmz-logo-240.jpg" alt="" />Haven't had enough Tiger Woods news lately? Are you absolutely obsessed with the comings and goings of Alex Rodriguez, Derek Jeter and their respective love lives? Well, the newest entrant into the world of sports reporting may keep you up to date on just that, and more. TMZ has become a major name in the world of celebrity news, and is now <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/28/business/media/28tmz.html" target="_blank">expanding its reach into the world of sports</a>. </p>
<p>The main reason for this move is that TMZ will no longer be tied to AOL (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/aol-inc/aol/nys" target="_blank">AOL</a>), which should make it easier for Harvey Levin to introduce a sports-related Internet site. The celeb happenings of the past year have helped to cement the validity of TMZ, but advertising sales are on pace to come in $10 million shy of a year ago. TMZ itself has evolved from a scoffed-at website that paid for tips and hints to major news stories to an "effective news-gathering operation of a certain kind" according to Time Warner (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/twx/nys">TWX</a>). TMZ came into its own this year, with the site's popularity exploding thanks to its report that Michael Jackson passed, which came in an hour before the "most mainstream news organizations."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/28/a-new-entry-into-sports-reporting-tmz/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>A New Entry into Sports Reporting: TMZ?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/28/a-new-entry-into-sports-reporting-tmz/">A New Entry into Sports Reporting: TMZ?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 28 Dec 2009 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/28/a-new-entry-into-sports-reporting-tmz/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19295453/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/28/a-new-entry-into-sports-reporting-tmz/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AOL</category><category>Harvey Levin</category><category>Internet reporting</category><category>inthenews</category><category>media</category><category>rumors</category><category>Tiger Woods</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TMZ</category><category>TMZ Sports</category><category>Tony Kornheiser</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Retail figures push oil lower ahead of today's inventory report]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/retail-figures-push-oil-lower-ahead-of-todays-inventory-report/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/retail-figures-push-oil-lower-ahead-of-todays-inventory-report/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/retail-figures-push-oil-lower-ahead-of-todays-inventory-report/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/falling-oil.gif" />Oil is dropping today as demand concerns hit investors once more following <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/oil-futures-fall-ahead-petroleum/story.aspx?guid={7E6E79CB-2416-4ED1-A111-6B54002EBA64}">today's dismal December retail figures</a>.<br /><br />Prices had been moving higher, but after news hit the market that <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bbdp/retail-sales-plunge-27-percent/304937">December retail sales fell by 2.7%</a>, investors got spooked, and prices are now down $0.29 a barrel to $37.49. Earlier in the session, oil had risen to as high as $39.45 on <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aQnrFvG2GEL4&amp;refer=home">more OPEC rumors</a>.<br /><br />As the retail figures hit the market, the 2.7% drop in December sales was much worse than what analysts had been predicting we would see, with the average consensus going into today's report being that we would see a drop in December sales of around 1.2%, so the actual figures was more than twice the drop the market was looking to see.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/retail-figures-push-oil-lower-ahead-of-todays-inventory-report/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Retail figures push oil lower ahead of today's inventory report</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/retail-figures-push-oil-lower-ahead-of-todays-inventory-report/">Retail figures push oil lower ahead of today's inventory report</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/retail-figures-push-oil-lower-ahead-of-todays-inventory-report/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1429341/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/retail-figures-push-oil-lower-ahead-of-todays-inventory-report/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>oil</category><category>oil prices</category><category>OilPrices</category><category>OPEC</category><category>retail</category><category>retail sales</category><category>RetailSales</category><category>rumors</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:21:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[How public company CEOs can squash false rumors]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/15/how-public-company-ceos-can-squash-false-rumors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/15/how-public-company-ceos-can-squash-false-rumors/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/15/how-public-company-ceos-can-squash-false-rumors/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><p>The SEC is trying to stop Wall Street players from spreading rumors that sink stocks, as I <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/14/is-the-sec-at-war-with-the-first-amendment/">posted</a> yesterday. The reason such rumors matter is because there are many companies that are unable to defend themselves from rumors. Bear Stearns comes to mind as an example. I think if someone tried to spread a rumor that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys"><strong>Goldman Sachs Group</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) or <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-a/brk.a/nys">Berkshire Hathaway Inc.</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-a/brk.a/nys">BRK.A</a>) were heading for bankruptcy, the rumor would not get foo far.</p>
<p>But if a company lacks such a strong reputation, its CEO needs to be prepared to respond effectively to such rumors. And I really don't think it should be difficult to mount an effective defense. In my mind, the CEO should be able to provide credible answers to two questions:</p>
<ul>
    <li><strong>Cash flow.</strong> How large are the company's short- and medium-term liabilities and how many times do the market value of its short- and medium-term assets cover these liabilities? </li>
    <li><strong>Debt default.</strong> What are the company's key loan terms and what specific assurance can the company provide that it is in compliance with these terms? </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/15/how-public-company-ceos-can-squash-false-rumors/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>How public company CEOs can squash false rumors</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/15/how-public-company-ceos-can-squash-false-rumors/">How public company CEOs can squash false rumors</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/15/how-public-company-ceos-can-squash-false-rumors/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1256616/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/15/how-public-company-ceos-can-squash-false-rumors/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BRK.A</category><category>CEOs</category><category>GS</category><category>rumors</category><category>SEC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[SEC hits 50 hedge funds with subpoenas in rumor probe]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/15/sec-hits-50-hedge-funds-with-subpoenas-in-rumor-probe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/15/sec-hits-50-hedge-funds-with-subpoenas-in-rumor-probe/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/15/sec-hits-50-hedge-funds-with-subpoenas-in-rumor-probe/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/u.s.sec.logo.jpg" />The Wall Street Journal</em> <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121608395388753035.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing">reports</a> (subscription required) that the SEC has subpoenaed 50 hedge-fund advisers as part of its probe into allegations that traders spread negative rumors to drive down the share prices of stocks they were short.<br /><br />It seems especially zealous given how little the SEC has done to crack down on a multitude of other problems harming investors, like the inadequate disclosures of serious risks that have sent shares of companies like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lehman-brothers-holdings-inc/leh/nys">Lehman Brothers</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lehman-brothers-holdings-inc/leh/nys">LEH</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/washington-mutual-incorporated/wm/nys">Washington Mutual</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/washington-mutual-incorporated/wm/nys">WM</a>) tumbling.<br /><br />Maybe there was some foul play at hedge funds, and maybe it's a good use of SEC resources to go after it. But it's worth noting that, throughout history, every time a bubble has burst, the short sellers who profited from its demise have been scapegoated for their foresight. The men who were at the helm of Bear Stearns (Yes, it was men. Women would never foul anything up that badly!) when it collapsed can blame rumor-spreading short sellers for causing a run on the bank. It's the same excuse that former Enron CEO Jeff Skilling invoked in his testimony before Congress.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/15/sec-hits-50-hedge-funds-with-subpoenas-in-rumor-probe/">SEC hits 50 hedge funds with subpoenas in rumor probe</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121608395388753035.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/15/sec-hits-50-hedge-funds-with-subpoenas-in-rumor-probe/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1255748/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/15/sec-hits-50-hedge-funds-with-subpoenas-in-rumor-probe/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Hedge Funds</category><category>HedgeFunds</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Rumors</category><category>SEC</category><category>Short</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Shame on short sellers for destroying the financials!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/14/shame-on-short-sellers-for-destroying-the-financials/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/14/shame-on-short-sellers-for-destroying-the-financials/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/14/shame-on-short-sellers-for-destroying-the-financials/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bsc/" rel="tag">Bear Stearns Cos (BSC)</a></p>Yesterday <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/14/sec-looks-to-crack-down-on-rumors/">I blogged</a>, with a good degree of skepticism, about the SEC's announcement that it is cracking down on rumor-spreading fear mongers looking to profit from declines in stocks like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In one of his daily email newsletters, hedge fund manager/all-around smart guy Whitney Tilson quotes one of his friends:<br /><em><br />Thank God someone is doing something about this. Because, as we all know, our financial regulators have done such a good job in overseeing the institutions that are suffering from this evil conspiracy. What would be even better is if the SEC, NYSE, etc. could identify and "bring to justice" those hedge funds and short-sellers that, through a vast conspiracy with the ever-compliant press, forced bank/brokerage management teams to make the trillions in bad loans that now imperil our economic system.<span></span><br /></em><br />Exactly. Regulators did nothing to protect investors and consumers from this mess, and have sat idly by while so many companies have failed to level with investors about their problems. The reason that the rumors have such impact on the market is that many investors have concluded, correctly, that they can't rely on these firms to provide timely updates about their prospects. If <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bsc/nys">BEAR STERNS COS INC</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bsc/nys">BSC</a>) was a victim of rumor-spreading short sellers, it was also a victim of its diminished credibility that created an opportunity for manipulation in the first place. The SEC should focus on actual problems, not rumors which, last time I checked, have <em>always</em> been part of the market.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/14/shame-on-short-sellers-for-destroying-the-financials/">Shame on short sellers for destroying the financials!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/14/shame-on-short-sellers-for-destroying-the-financials/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1255548/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/14/shame-on-short-sellers-for-destroying-the-financials/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>rumors</category><category>short sellers</category><category>ShortSellers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:21:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[SEC looks to crack down on rumors]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/14/sec-looks-to-crack-down-on-rumors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/14/sec-looks-to-crack-down-on-rumors/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/14/sec-looks-to-crack-down-on-rumors/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fnm/" rel="tag">Federal Natl Mtge (FNM)</a></p><img width="220" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="220" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/rumours08.jpg" alt="" />In a <a href="http://sec.gov/">press release</a> issued on Sunday -- presumably meant to be a warning to traders before the opening bell on Monday -- the SEC announced that "the SEC and other securities regulators will immediately conduct examinations aimed at the prevention of the intentional spread of false information intended to manipulate securities prices."<br /><br />Cash-bleeding train wrecks like Bear Stearns and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lehman-brothers-holdings-inc/leh/nys">Lehman Brothers</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lehman-brothers-holdings-inc/leh/nys">LEH</a>) have complained that rumor-mongering has damaged investors by causing a precipitous slide in their stock prices. Bear Stearns executives have essentially blamed short-sellers for the company collapse which is, interestingly, the same argument made by Enron's former head honchos. Just saying.<br /><br />I don't doubt that there's a fair amount of hanky panky on the part of short-sellers looking to profit from declines in share price, but I think that massive writedowns and a lack of transparency at these companies have been larger factors. As DealBreaker <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/01/seeing-through-the-bear-stearns-conspiracy-theories/">recently noted</a>, "if a company can be brought down by the corporate equivalent of 7th grade girls passing notes in class, perhaps it doesn't deserve to exist anyway."<br /><br /><em>The Wall Street Journal</em> <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121599785046349851.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing">notes </a>(subscription required) that "The need for such a move by the SEC took on new urgency after a brutal week in the U.S. stock market, where major financial firms such as Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were battered as rumors about everything from government bailouts to possible mergers flew across Wall Street."<br /><br />This just in: <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/fed-to-rescue-fannie-mae-freddie-mac/20080713193909990001">Fed to rescue Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac</a>. Apparently those mean short-selling trash-talkers were onto something.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/14/sec-looks-to-crack-down-on-rumors/">SEC looks to crack down on rumors</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 14 Jul 2008 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121599785046349851.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/14/sec-looks-to-crack-down-on-rumors/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1254417/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/14/sec-looks-to-crack-down-on-rumors/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bsc</category><category>fannie mae</category><category>FannieMae</category><category>FNM</category><category>FRE</category><category>freddie mac</category><category>FreddieMac</category><category>inthenews</category><category>leh</category><category>Rumors</category><category>SEC</category><category>short sellers</category><category>short selling</category><category>ShortSellers</category><category>ShortSelling</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[What exactly is a takeover rumor? Be skeptical]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/06/what-exactly-is-a-takeover-rumor-be-skeptical/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/06/what-exactly-is-a-takeover-rumor-be-skeptical/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/06/what-exactly-is-a-takeover-rumor-be-skeptical/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/kkd/" rel="tag">Krispy Kreme Doughnuts (KKD)</a></p><p>MGL Asset Management Group's press release purporting to offer $7.25 per share for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/krispy-kreme-doughnuts-inc/kkd/nys">Krispy Kreme Doughnuts </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/krispy-kreme-doughnuts-inc/kkd/nys">KKD</a>) was pretty quickly debunked as illegitimate and, very probably, an effort to hype the stock for a quick buck. Jon Ogg reported on the mysterious offer on our sister site, <a href="http://www.bloggingbuyouts.com/2008/07/01/is-krispy-kreme-on-buyout-block/">BloggingBuyouts</a>.</p>
<p>The stock jumped on the news of the offer, but quickly gave up all the gains and then some after media and analyst reports dismissed the offer. But anyone who jumped on the stock at the sight of the press release got burned.</p>
<p>How can you prevent this from happening to you? A good rule of thumb: When you're looking for information on material developments, look to the SEC filings. The offer was made solely through a press release -- something that anyone with a few hundred bucks to pay the wire fee could send into the hands of millions of investors in a few minutes. Until you see something about the "offer" in the SEC's Edgar Database, it should be regarded as a rumor. I <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/30/is-sherwood-investments-tossing-trans-world-shareholders-an-air/">wrote about </a>a similarly non-materializing offer at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/trans-world-entertainment-corporation/twmc/nas">Trans World Entertainment</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/trans-world-entertainment-corporation/twmc/nas">TWMC</a>) back in November.</p>
<p>Another solution is to leave the "in-play" trading to the pros -- it's all about information and you're unlikely to have an edge. If you see a news item that a company has received an offer, don't jump in.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/06/what-exactly-is-a-takeover-rumor-be-skeptical/">What exactly is a takeover rumor? Be skeptical</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 06 Jul 2008 15:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/06/what-exactly-is-a-takeover-rumor-be-skeptical/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1246559/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/06/what-exactly-is-a-takeover-rumor-be-skeptical/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BloggingBuyouts</category><category>Jon Ogg</category><category>KKD</category><category>Krispy Kreme Doughnuts</category><category>MGL</category><category>MGL Asset Management Group</category><category>rumors</category><category>SEC filings</category><category>Trans World Entertainment</category><category>TWMC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 15:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Meg Whitman and Mitt Romney: Oh, the gut wrenching horror of it]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/27/meg-whitman-and-mitt-romney-oh-the-gut-wrenching-horror-of-it/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/27/meg-whitman-and-mitt-romney-oh-the-gut-wrenching-horror-of-it/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/27/meg-whitman-and-mitt-romney-oh-the-gut-wrenching-horror-of-it/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a></p><img width="181" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/logoebay_150x70%5B1%5D.gif" alt="eBay logo" />I seriously enjoy reading Ina Steiner. She's the editor of AuctionBytes.com. I like her stuff because she's just so damn objective. She simply lays out the facts and lets you come to your own conclusions. I also like Ina because she continuously holds a very bright light directly at <a href="http://beta.finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas">eBay</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://beta.finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas">EBAY</a>). <br /><br />Recently, Ina opened the floor at the <a href="http://blog.auctionbytes.com/cgi-bin/blog/blog.pl?/pl/2007/12/1197737407.html">AuctionBytes blog</a> for discussion about the involvement of Meg Whitman in the Mitt Romney campaign. Needless to say, the situation has raised some eyebrows. Personally, I don't care what direction either Meg or Mitt choose to go. Ina's readers, however, had a very dim view of the situation. My question is, has Meg's insurgence into the political realm affected the shareholders of eBay?<br /><br />Forget for a moment all the ill conceived plans that eBay has tripped over. Ignore <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/ebays-skype-has-last-attempt-at-success/">the Skype debacle</a>, the eBay China crash, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/24/newspaper-wrap-up-ebay-involved-in-collusion/">the silencing of Stubhub</a> and the host of other demons that in my opinion the Whitman crew has set loose, buried or denied. Forget for a moment about all that cash flowing into eBay coffers with nothing better accomplished than to outsource customer service and to pay Whitman's salary. Ignore the wolf at the door in the form of <a href="http://beta.finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">Amazon Inc</a>.(NASDAQ: <a href="http://beta.finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">AMZN</a>). Never mind that <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/21/should-amazon-buy-ebay/">eBay has lost its shine and reputation</a> and is yet to pay a dividend to its shareholders. I'm talking about presidential politics and corporate wrangling here.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/27/meg-whitman-and-mitt-romney-oh-the-gut-wrenching-horror-of-it/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Meg Whitman and Mitt Romney: Oh, the gut wrenching horror of it</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/27/meg-whitman-and-mitt-romney-oh-the-gut-wrenching-horror-of-it/">Meg Whitman and Mitt Romney: Oh, the gut wrenching horror of it</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 27 Dec 2007 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://blog.auctionbytes.com/cgi-bin/blog/blog.pl?/pl/2007/12/1197737407.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/27/meg-whitman-and-mitt-romney-oh-the-gut-wrenching-horror-of-it/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1071546/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/27/meg-whitman-and-mitt-romney-oh-the-gut-wrenching-horror-of-it/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Amazon</category><category>AuctionBytes</category><category>CEO</category><category>eBay</category><category>election</category><category>finance</category><category>Ina Steiner</category><category>InaSteiner</category><category>Meg Whitman</category><category>MegWhitman</category><category>Mitt Romney</category><category>MittRomney</category><category>president</category><category>rumors</category><category>Skype</category><category>speculation</category><category>StubHub</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will Samsung save Micron?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/06/will-samsung-save-micron/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/06/will-samsung-save-micron/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/06/will-samsung-save-micron/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/israel/" rel="tag">Israel</a></p><p>Shares in chip-maker <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/micron-technology-inc/mu/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Micron Technology, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/micron-technology-inc/mu/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">MU</a>) are trading higher on <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/micron-up-on-samsung-acquisition-rumor/n20071205185609990007">rumors</a> that Samsung Electronics may buy part of their business. The South Korean Electronics giant is <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/samsung-electronics-denies-reported/n20071205191209990013">denying</a> the report. Micron Technology of the U.S. is the world's leading producer of CMOS image-sensing chips. Micron three years ago invested heavily in image-sensor chips as a hedge against fluctuations in demand and prices of memory chips. Business has been very week as prices for these chips have plummeted. That being said, chip-makers have started cutting production to create better pricing.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Morgan Stanley</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">MS</a>) analyst Atif Malik said he understood why investors are getting excited about a potential price rebound for Micron shares as chip makers are starting to cut production in some less-profitable types of chips. </p>
<p>While Samsung denies the rumors, I wouldn't be surprised if a deal gets done. Why? Because in October Samsung bought <a href="http://israelnewsletter.com/2007/12/04/merrill-gets-contrarian-on-marvell-mrvl/">Israeli</a> non-memory chip developer TransChip Inc. to help strengthen its research and development capability in the CMOS chip business.<br /></p>
<p>With Micron shares down more than 35% from their 52 week high, Samsung would be able to establish a real foothold in this business for cheap.</p>
<p><em>Aaron Katsman is the lead Portfolio Manager and Managing Director of America Israel Investment Associates, LLC. and Senior Editor of </em><a href="http://www.israelnewsletter.com/"><em><font color="#0072bc">IsraelNewsletter.com</font></em></a><em>. Disclosure: Writer has no position in any stock mentioned as of 12/6/07.</em></p>
<p><br /><br /> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/06/will-samsung-save-micron/">Will Samsung save Micron?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/micron-up-on-samsung-acquisition-rumor/n20071205185609990007>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/samsung-electronics-denies-reported/n20071205191209990013>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://israelnewsletter.com/2007/12/04/merrill-gets-contrarian-on-marvell-mrvl/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/06/will-samsung-save-micron/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1056760/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/06/will-samsung-save-micron/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>buyouts</category><category>israel</category><category>micron technology</category><category>MicronTechnology</category><category>rumors</category><category>samsung electronics</category><category>SamsungElectronics</category><category>semiconductors</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Katsman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:12:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wall Street Rumor: Paulson leaving Treasury to run Citigroup]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/28/wall-street-rumor-paulson-leaving-treasury-to-run-citigroup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/28/wall-street-rumor-paulson-leaving-treasury-to-run-citigroup/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/28/wall-street-rumor-paulson-leaving-treasury-to-run-citigroup/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><p>A Wall Street source has told me that there is a rumor floating around that current Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson is leaving his post to take over <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>).</p>
<p>Naturally, this rumor interests me because I have <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/06/time-to-replace-citigroups-c-prince-with-hank-paulson/">posted</a> wistfully about this outcome for the last several months. While Paulson may not be the greatest Treasury secretary in American history, he had an excellent track record at <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Goldman Sachs Group</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">GS</a>) and he would do his reputation a big favor if he could step into Citigroup and save it from ruin.</p>
<p>Citigroup has been hurting badly all year. In the first part of 2007, it suffered because its costs were growing faster than its revenues. Then it missed its third-quarter earnings numbers and announced a much bigger-than-expected write-down of assets related to subprime mortgage-backed securities. This culminated in the departure of Citigroup's CEO, Chuck Prince on <a href="http://www.citigroup.com/citigroup/press/2007/071104a.htm">November 4</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/28/wall-street-rumor-paulson-leaving-treasury-to-run-citigroup/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Wall Street Rumor: Paulson leaving Treasury to run Citigroup</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/28/wall-street-rumor-paulson-leaving-treasury-to-run-citigroup/">Wall Street Rumor: Paulson leaving Treasury to run Citigroup</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/28/wall-street-rumor-paulson-leaving-treasury-to-run-citigroup/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1049970/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/28/wall-street-rumor-paulson-leaving-treasury-to-run-citigroup/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>c</category><category>citigroup</category><category>goldman sachs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>gs</category><category>hank paulson</category><category>HankPaulson</category><category>rumors</category><category>Treasury Secretary</category><category>TreasurySecretary</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Don't buy E*Trade on the rumors]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/24/dont-buy-e-trade-on-the-rumors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/24/dont-buy-e-trade-on-the-rumors/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/24/dont-buy-e-trade-on-the-rumors/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a></p><p><img height="171" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/etrade.gif" width="160" align="right" alt="" />One of my favorite Jim Cramer-isms is "Commandment No. 5" -- Tips are for waiters. Here's what <a href="http://www.thestreet.com/funds/smarter_up/10217292.html">he writes</a>:</p>
<p><em>You know that the best moves are takeovers and you are convinced that if you can catch one, it will make up for all the bum steers and bad bets you have made. Tips are winning lottery tickets in most people's eyes. </em></p>
<p><em>That's the reason I've had to default to a simple analogy, tips are for waiters, to remind myself how stupid tips really are. Does it occur to you, on hearing the tip, that if the person telling you that </em><em>Nokia</em><em> is going to buy RIM really knows that's going to happen, the person is an insider and is breaking the law, and you could get in trouble, too? Does it occur to you that if the person isn't an insider, he doesn't know? There simply is no way a tip like that can work. Leave it for the waiter.</em> </p>
<p>That's what investors should be keeping in mind as they watch shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/e-trade-financial-corporation/etfc/nas">E*Trade</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/e-trade-financial-corporation/etfc/nas">ETFC</a>) surge on <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21942572/">extraordinarily vague takeover rumors</a>. Shares were up as much as 25% on rumors that Schwab and Ameritrade were interested in buying the beleaguered broker. Where did these rumors come from? Ah, yes. "A source." And who's to say that "the source" isn't some clown holding a ton of E*Trade shares that he needs to get rid of -- for 25% more than they were trading before the rumor?</p>
<p>Everyone knows E*Trade could be in play -- any time a stock tanks that much, there are always going to rumors. But no one really knows what's going on, and buying E*Trade on the rumor is just mindless speculation.</p>
<p>As <a href="javascript:void(0);/*1195933312265*/">Doug McIntyre wrote</a>, "E*Trade may be worth over $5, but it could also be worth a lot less."</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/24/dont-buy-e-trade-on-the-rumors/">Don't buy E*Trade on the rumors</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 24 Nov 2007 18:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/24/dont-buy-e-trade-on-the-rumors/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1047051/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/24/dont-buy-e-trade-on-the-rumors/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>buyout rumors</category><category>E*Trade</category><category>ETFC</category><category>Etrade</category><category>Jim Cramer</category><category>rumors</category><category>speculation</category><category>stock tips</category><category>takeover rumors</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 18:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs (GS) higher on good news from competitors]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/goldman-sachs-gs-higher-on-good-news-from-competitors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/goldman-sachs-gs-higher-on-good-news-from-competitors/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/goldman-sachs-gs-higher-on-good-news-from-competitors/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mer/" rel="tag">Merrill Lynch (MER)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cfc/" rel="tag">Countrywide Financial (CFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><a href="http://www2.goldmansachs.com/our_firm/investor_relations/" target="_blank"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/gs-goldman-sachs-logo.jpg" alt="GS logo" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs Group Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) is getting a boost today from other stocks in the industry, like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/countrywide-financial-corporation/cfc/nys">Countrywide</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/countrywide-financial-corporation/cfc/nys">CFC</a>), which <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articlehybrid.aspx?type=comktNews&amp;rpc=33&amp;storyid=2007-10-26T142611Z_01_N26305099_RTRIDST_0_COUNTRYWIDE-RESULTS-UPDATE-4.XML">reported a big Q3 loss this morning, but also said it expects its earnings per share in the fourth quarter to range between 25 cents and 75 cents</a>. It also anticipates its return on equity for 2008 to range between 10 percent and 15 percent. This outlook is lifting the stock nearly 15%. Furthermore, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merrill-lynch-and-co-inc/mer/nys">Merrill Lynch</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merrill-lynch-and-co-inc/mer/nys">MER</a>) is reported to be <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/merrill-rockets-on-takeover-ceo-talk/n20071026104209990024" target="_blank">considering replacing its troubled CEO and maybe even a takeover offer</a>, which is pulling that stock and other financial interests higher as well. If you think that the company won't fall by too much in the coming months, then now could be a good time to look at a bullish hedged trade on GS.<br /><br />Goldman has powered back from its 52-week low of $157.38 in August to a new high of $239.70 earlier this month. GS opened this morning at $232.86. So far today the stock has hit a low of $229.36 and a high of $233.50. As of 11:05, GS is trading at 231.45, up 4.79 (2.1%). The chart for GS looks bullish and steady, while <a href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline" target="_blank">S&amp;P</a> gives the stock a very positive 5 STARS (out of 5) strong buy rating.<br /><br />For a bullish hedged play on this stock, I would consider a December <a href="http://www.iotogo.com/HSCS" target="_blank">bull-put credit spread</a> below the $180 range. A bull-put credit spread is an options position that combines the purchase and sale of put options to hedge risk in case the stock doesn't do what you think but still leverage nice returns. For this particular trade, we will make a 5.3% return in just 2 months as long as GS is above $180 at December expiration. Goldman would have to fall by more than 21% before we would start to lose money. Learn more about this type of trade <a href="http://www.iotogo.com/HSCS" target="_blank">here</a>.<br /><br /><br /><a href="http://money.aol.com/news/earnings" /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/goldman-sachs-gs-higher-on-good-news-from-competitors/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Goldman Sachs (GS) higher on good news from competitors</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/goldman-sachs-gs-higher-on-good-news-from-competitors/">Goldman Sachs (GS) higher on good news from competitors</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 26 Oct 2007 11:17:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/goldman-sachs-gs-higher-on-good-news-from-competitors/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1022642/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/goldman-sachs-gs-higher-on-good-news-from-competitors/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CFC</category><category>Countrywide Financial</category><category>CountrywideFinancial</category><category>earnings</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>GS</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>InvestorsObserver</category><category>MER</category><category>Merrill Lynch</category><category>MerrillLynch</category><category>options</category><category>rumors</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 11:17:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
