<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Should 'Avatar' Be Rushed to DVD Now That It Is in Second Place?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/should-avatar-be-rushed-to-dvd-now-that-it-is-in-second-place/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/should-avatar-be-rushed-to-dvd-now-that-it-is-in-second-place/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/should-avatar-be-rushed-to-dvd-now-that-it-is-in-second-place/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lgf/" rel="tag">Lions Gate Entertainment (LGF)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" height="180" width="240" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/vizio.gif" /> We all knew News Corp.'s (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">NWS</a>) <em>Avatar</em> would cede the top spot to some film someday. To be honest, I didn't think Sony's (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">SNE</a>) <em>Dear John</em> would be the one to do it.</p>
<p>According to <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/">Box Office Mojo</a>, <em>John</em> grossed roughly $32 million at domestic theaters. That was more than enough to put the sci-fi flick in second place. However, no one should feel sad for News Corp.; <em>Avatar</em>'s worldwide haul now stands at over <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=avatar.htm">$2.2 billion</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/should-avatar-be-rushed-to-dvd-now-that-it-is-in-second-place/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Should 'Avatar' Be Rushed to DVD Now That It Is in Second Place?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/should-avatar-be-rushed-to-dvd-now-that-it-is-in-second-place/">Should 'Avatar' Be Rushed to DVD Now That It Is in Second Place?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/should-avatar-be-rushed-to-dvd-now-that-it-is-in-second-place/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19349291/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/should-avatar-be-rushed-to-dvd-now-that-it-is-in-second-place/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Avatar</category><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>dear john</category><category>DearJohn</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>Hulu</category><category>inthenews</category><category>LGF</category><category>lions gate entertainment</category><category>LionsGateEntertainment</category><category>nbc universal</category><category>NbcUniversal</category><category>news corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>rupert murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><category>SNE</category><category>Sony</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[News Corp.'s 'Avatar' Isn't Ready to Step Down]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/news-corp-s-avatar-isnt-ready-to-step-down/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/news-corp-s-avatar-isnt-ready-to-step-down/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/news-corp-s-avatar-isnt-ready-to-step-down/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/avatar-movie-poster.jpg" alt="" />Did you think Mel Gibson had a chance this past weekend? Probably not. By now, we're all used to seeing News Corp.s (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">NWS</a>) <em>Avatar</em> take the top spot. And for those keeping score, this is the seventh victory in a row for James Cameron (who, by the way, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/31/entrepreneurs-journal-business-lessons-from-avatars-james-cam/">may offer lessons for entrepreneurs</a>, according to Tom Taulli).</p>
<p>According to early estimates from <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/">Box Office Mojo</a>, <em>Avatar</em> made another $30 million at domestic theaters over the past three days. At the time of this writing, the worldwide gross was just under $2 billion (it will definitely go over $2 billion, don't worry). Time Warner's (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) <em>Edge of Darkness</em>, starring the aforementioned Gibson, wasn't even close to a challenge for the 3-D aliens. Give it some credit, though: It came in second with $17 million.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/news-corp-s-avatar-isnt-ready-to-step-down/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>News Corp.'s 'Avatar' Isn't Ready to Step Down</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/news-corp-s-avatar-isnt-ready-to-step-down/">News Corp.'s 'Avatar' Isn't Ready to Step Down</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 01 Feb 2010 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/news-corp-s-avatar-isnt-ready-to-step-down/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19339017/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/01/news-corp-s-avatar-isnt-ready-to-step-down/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Avatar</category><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>edge of darkness</category><category>EdgeOfDarkness</category><category>featured</category><category>james cameron</category><category>JamesCameron</category><category>mel gibson</category><category>MelGibson</category><category>news corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>rupert murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft and News Corp talk about pushing Google aside]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/microsoft-and-news-corp-talk-about-pushing-google-aside/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/microsoft-and-news-corp-talk-about-pushing-google-aside/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/microsoft-and-news-corp-talk-about-pushing-google-aside/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img hspace="4" height="46" border="1" align="right" width="200" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/microsoft-msft-logo.jpg" alt="" />Often, we confuse winning with being the best. This isn't always the case. There are plenty of ways to get ahead when you don't have the top product on the market. The smoke-filled backroom meetings may be a thing of the past, but the net effect lingers. This is exactly what went down, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34099291/ns/business-us_business/" target="_blank">according to a Reuters report</a>, when Microsoft (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas" target="_blank">MSFT</a>) had a chat with News Corp (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas" target="_blank">NWS</a>).</p>
<p>Microsoft suggested a relationship with News Corp which would involve the latter's yanking its news sites from Google (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">GOOG</a>) ... for a fee, of course. This would cost the search engine giant -- which is also a news aggregation giant -- access to some hefty publications, including the <a href="http://www.wsj.com" target="_blank"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a>, the <em><a href="http://www.thesun.co.uk/" target="_blank">Sun</a></em> and the <em><a href="http://www.nypost.com" target="_blank">New York Post</a></em>.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/microsoft-and-news-corp-talk-about-pushing-google-aside/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft and News Corp talk about pushing Google aside</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/microsoft-and-news-corp-talk-about-pushing-google-aside/">Microsoft and News Corp talk about pushing Google aside</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34099291/ns/business-us_business/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/microsoft-and-news-corp-talk-about-pushing-google-aside/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19250417/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/microsoft-and-news-corp-talk-about-pushing-google-aside/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bing</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>new york post</category><category>news</category><category>news corp</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>newspaper</category><category>NewYorkPost</category><category>NWS</category><category>rupert murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><category>wall street journal</category><category>WallStreetJournal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Amazon in the lead, but Kindle competition is coming]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/amazon-in-the-lead-but-kindle-competition-is-coming/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/amazon-in-the-lead-but-kindle-competition-is-coming/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/amazon-in-the-lead-but-kindle-competition-is-coming/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/amzn-kindle.jpg" />For retailers, the crucial season is on its way. Blow the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Christmas/">Christmas</a> rush, and next year starts off on a miserable foot. Success, of course, also delivers a healthy dose of momentum -- and a little bit of wiggle room, important in what will continue to be a tough economy through at least the first half of next year. For <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/booksellers/">booksellers</a>, now contending with a new variable in the form of digital readers, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSTRE59I01I20091019?pageNumber=2&amp;virtualBrandChannel=0" target="_blank">e-readers will play a major role in defining the winners and losers</a>. So far, it looks like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas" target="_blank">Amazon</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas" target="_blank">AMZN</a>) is off to a great start, and it will take some genuine innovation for the competition to chip away at its market share.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barnes-and-noble-inc/bks/nys" target="_blank">Barnes &amp; Noble</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barnes-and-noble-inc/bks/nys" target="_blank">BKS</a>), once the leading names in literary retail, is expected to release its own e-reader this week. It will look a bit like Amazon's Kindle, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSTRE59I01I20091019?pageNumber=2&amp;virtualBrandChannel=0" target="_blank">according to Reuters</a>, but with a touch screen intended to make the reader's experience easier. The price hasn't been disclosed yet, but rumor has it that it'll be higher than the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Kindle/">Kindle</a>'s $259. BKS is staying mum on its plans in this space. There are others in the space, as well, including IREX Technologies, which is a spinoff of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/koninklijke-philips-electronics-n-v/phg/nys" target="_blank">Royal Philips Electronics</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/koninklijke-philips-electronics-n-v/phg/nys" target="_blank">PHG</a>), Asutek (tk: tk) and a project called FirstPaper that has <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Hearst/">Hearst</a> behind it.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/amazon-in-the-lead-but-kindle-competition-is-coming/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Amazon in the lead, but Kindle competition is coming</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/amazon-in-the-lead-but-kindle-competition-is-coming/">Amazon in the lead, but Kindle competition is coming</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 19 Oct 2009 08:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSTRE59I01I20091019?pageNumber=2&amp;virtualBrandChannel=0>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/amazon-in-the-lead-but-kindle-competition-is-coming/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19200269/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/amazon-in-the-lead-but-kindle-competition-is-coming/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>amazon</category><category>amazon kindle</category><category>amazon.com</category><category>AmazonKindle</category><category>amzn</category><category>barnes and noble</category><category>barnes and noble incorporated</category><category>BarnesAndNoble</category><category>BarnesAndNobleIncorporated</category><category>bks</category><category>booksellers</category><category>christmas</category><category>hearst</category><category>holiday</category><category>holiday shopping</category><category>holidays</category><category>HolidayShopping</category><category>inthenews</category><category>kindle</category><category>phg</category><category>philips electronics</category><category>PhilipsElectronics</category><category>rupert murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 08:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[More bank stress tests needed?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/09/more-stress-tests-needed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/09/more-stress-tests-needed/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/09/more-stress-tests-needed/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/dollarsign-at150-02blog.jpg" alt="" />The Congressional Oversight Panel announced in a report this morning that it feels <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/more-bank-stress-tests-may-be-needed/519576">more bank stress tests are needed</a>, especially if unemployment rates continue to rise. The group believes that the stress tests should be repeated periodically as long as banks continue to hold toxic assets. <br /><br />The panel used a risk-modeling approach that is described as "reasonable and conservative," but added that it is impossible for an outside party to mirror the loss projections that form the core of the stress tests. The group noted that the "more adverse scenario" assumption for the U.S. unemployment rate in the tests has nearly been met in 2009. The yearly average for the unemployment rate stands at 8.5%, which isn't far from the 8.9% assumed in the first round of stress tests. The group recommended that the "Treasury publicly track the status of its stress test macro-economic assumptions (unemployment, GDP, and housing prices) and repeat the stress test if the adverse scenario assumptions have been exceeded."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/09/more-stress-tests-needed/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>More bank stress tests needed?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/09/more-stress-tests-needed/">More bank stress tests needed?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 09 Jun 2009 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/09/more-stress-tests-needed/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19061840/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/09/more-stress-tests-needed/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank stress tests</category><category>BankStressTests</category><category>economic crisis</category><category>EconomicCrisis</category><category>GDP</category><category>housing prices</category><category>HousingPrices</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><category>TARP</category><category>tarp repayment</category><category>TarpRepayment</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[News Corp. appoints new chairman]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/news-corp-appoints-new-chairman/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/news-corp-appoints-new-chairman/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/news-corp-appoints-new-chairman/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/nws-news-corp-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />It looks like it is out with the old, in with the old at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">News Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">NWS</a>), as former executive Chase Carey is <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/top-exec-returns-to-news-corp-to-replace-coo">returning to the company</a> in the role of deputy chairman and chief operating officer. Carey has served as the CEO of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-directv-group-inc-cmn-stk/dtv/nas">DirecTV Group</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-directv-group-inc-cmn-stk/dtv/nas">DTV</a>) for the past six years, but was the co-chief operating officer for NWS from 1996 through 2002. Carey will replace COO Peter Chernin, who announced in February that he would depart NWS when his contract runs out at the end of June. <br /><br />It is no secret that NWS has struggled since the economic crisis started, as weakness in the company's catalog of DVDs have driven the stock lower. Carey helped the company become a "truly viable fourth broadcast network" by helping Fox land NFL games, and helping launch Fox News Channel, FX, and the National Geographic Channel.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/news-corp-appoints-new-chairman/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>News Corp. appoints new chairman</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/news-corp-appoints-new-chairman/">News Corp. appoints new chairman</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/news-corp-appoints-new-chairman/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19057456/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/04/news-corp-appoints-new-chairman/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Chase Carey</category><category>ChaseCarey</category><category>inthenews</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch to Google: Stop stealing!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/rupert-murdoch-to-google-stop-stealing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/rupert-murdoch-to-google-stop-stealing/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/rupert-murdoch-to-google-stop-stealing/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/google-news-logo.png" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) has made enemy after enemy in recent years after continuing to aggregate news and information sources to ensure customers can find the information they want, any time and on any device. </p>
<p>When Google News was launched, it became a target for publishers who believed that Google was somehow pilfering content. These folks still do not get it, especially media baron Rupert Murdoch. It's odd, since Murdoch seemingly gets new media.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/rupert-murdoch-to-google-stop-stealing/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Rupert Murdoch to Google: Stop stealing!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/rupert-murdoch-to-google-stop-stealing/">Rupert Murdoch to Google: Stop stealing!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 07 Apr 2009 09:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.forbes.com/2009/04/03/rupert-murdoch-google-business-media-murdoch.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/rupert-murdoch-to-google-stop-stealing/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1508904/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/rupert-murdoch-to-google-stop-stealing/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Google News</category><category>GoogleNews</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 09:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[DailyFinance today: Phillies pitcher loses everything in Stanford scandal, Rupert Murdoch problems, 401(k) skimming, OPEC and the price slide]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/dailyfinance-today-phillies-pitcher-loses-everything-in-standor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/dailyfinance-today-phillies-pitcher-loses-everything-in-standor/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/dailyfinance-today-phillies-pitcher-loses-everything-in-standor/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" style="border-width: 0pt;">
    <tbody>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top" align="right"><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/02/25/philllies-pitcher-loses-everything-in-stanford-scandal/"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/02/baseball_pc_200_041305_thumbnail.jpg" /></a></td>
            <td><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/02/25/philllies-pitcher-loses-everything-in-stanford-scandal/">Phillies pitcher loses everything in Stanford scandal</a></td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top" align="right"><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/02/25/problems-mount-for-rupert-murdoch/"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/rupert-murdoch_thumbnail.jpg" /></a></td>
            <td><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/02/25/problems-mount-for-rupert-murdoch/">Problems mount for Rupert Murdoch</a></td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top" align="right"><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/02/25/the-401-k-skimming-scam/"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/dan_solin_5668-%28wince%29_thumbnail.jpg" /></a></td>
            <td><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/02/25/the-401-k-skimming-scam/">The 401(k) skimming scam</a> </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top" align="right"><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/02/25/can-opec-stop-the-oil-price-slide/"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/02/pumping-gas_thumbnail.jpg" /></a></td>
            <td><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/02/25/can-opec-stop-the-oil-price-slide/" rel="bookmark">Can OPEC stop the oil price slide?</a> </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top" align="right"><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/02/25/ubs-makes-a-31-billion-order-error/"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/02/tokyo_stock_exchange_thumbnail.jpg" /></a></td>
            <td> <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/02/25/ubs-makes-a-31-billion-order-error/" rel="bookmark">UBS makes a $31 billion order error</a> </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top" align="right"><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/02/25/picks-and-pans-procter-and-gamble-is-a-quintessential-defensive-p/"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/picks-and-pans_thumbnail.jpg" /></a></td>
            <td><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/02/25/picks-and-pans-procter-and-gamble-is-a-quintessential-defensive-p/" rel="bookmark">Picks and pans: Apple faces technical resistance, Immucor is a recession-resistant buy</a> </td>
        </tr>
    </tbody>
</table><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/dailyfinance-today-phillies-pitcher-loses-everything-in-standor/">DailyFinance today: Phillies pitcher loses everything in Stanford scandal, Rupert Murdoch problems, 401(k) skimming, OPEC and the price slide</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/dailyfinance-today-phillies-pitcher-loses-everything-in-standor/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1471702/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/dailyfinance-today-phillies-pitcher-loses-everything-in-standor/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>401K skimming</category><category>401kSkimming</category><category>dailyfinance</category><category>OPEC</category><category>rupert murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><category>UBS</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch: Another old man loses key management  ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/rupert-murdoch-another-old-man-loses-key-management-cbs-via/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/rupert-murdoch-another-old-man-loses-key-management-cbs-via/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/rupert-murdoch-another-old-man-loses-key-management-cbs-via/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/rupert-murdoch-nws.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />Sumner Redstone, who is the de facto head of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">Viacom</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a>), was supposed to be the media baron who could not keep his top management. Now Rupert Murdoch, CEO of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">News Corp</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">NWS</a>), has joined the club. The president of his company, Peter Chernin, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123542374683052407.html?mod=testMod">is leaving</a>.</p>
<p>Murdoch may be gambling that he can keep his job for life and hand it to one of his children. Since he is 77 and none of his children may be qualified, that could be a bad gamble. At least Chernin could have kept the CEO's seat warm while one of Murdoch's offspring got some more on-the-job training.</p>
<p>The press has made the Chernin departure into a story about the earnings trouble at News Corp. In reality, its problems are not much worse than they are at most other big media companies. News Corp is burdened more than some of its peers because of its newspaper holdings. But, odds are that News Corp will make it out of the recession intact and in a position to take advantage of the eventual improvement in the ad markets.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/rupert-murdoch-another-old-man-loses-key-management-cbs-via/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Rupert Murdoch: Another old man loses key management  </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/rupert-murdoch-another-old-man-loses-key-management-cbs-via/">Rupert Murdoch: Another old man loses key management  </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/rupert-murdoch-another-old-man-loses-key-management-cbs-via/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1469718/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/rupert-murdoch-another-old-man-loses-key-management-cbs-via/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CBS</category><category>inthenews</category><category>NWS</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><category>Sumner Redstone</category><category>SumnerRedstone</category><category>VIA</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is it time for a management change at News Corp?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/is-it-time-for-a-management-change-at-news-corp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/is-it-time-for-a-management-change-at-news-corp/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/is-it-time-for-a-management-change-at-news-corp/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation-limited-the/nws/nas"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/nws.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />News Corp.</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation-limited-the/nws/nas">NWS</a>) CEO Rupert Murdoch, at 77, has been around for a while. But it looks like that while may be too long after today's report on News Corp. earnings and outlook. That report suggests that Murdoch wildly overpaid for Dow Jones. But he wanted it and he got what he wanted. The questions for long-suffering shareholders is whether what <em>Murdoch</em> wants is good for <em>them</em> and whether he's the person to lead News Corp through the troubled waters ahead.</p>
<p>Prospects are for more pain. Analysts are estimating a <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=asBjNm97.I24&amp;refer=us">22%</a> drop in News Corp.'s fiscal 2009 operating profit to almost $4 billion. And with its stock down 56% in the last year, what could Murdoch do to revive it? One possibility is to restructure the newspapers in a radical -- but obvious way -- put all the content online and sell search advertising to those who want access to all the readers. That would cut the cost of the newspapers tremendously.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/is-it-time-for-a-management-change-at-news-corp/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is it time for a management change at News Corp?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/is-it-time-for-a-management-change-at-news-corp/">Is it time for a management change at News Corp?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 06 Feb 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=asBjNm9>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/is-it-time-for-a-management-change-at-news-corp/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1452347/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/is-it-time-for-a-management-change-at-news-corp/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bskyb</category><category>entertainment</category><category>inthenews</category><category>media</category><category>NWs</category><category>NY Post</category><category>NyPost</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[News Corp.'s Q2 earnings get low ratings ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/news-corp-s-q2-earnings-get-low-ratings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/news-corp-s-q2-earnings-get-low-ratings/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/news-corp-s-q2-earnings-get-low-ratings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/rupert-murdoch.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>), the big media conglomerate that competes with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">Viacom</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) NBC Universal, reported not-so-good earnings for the <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/news-corporation-reports-second-quarter/rfid182514564">fiscal second quarter</a> on Thursday after the bell. <br /></p>
<p>Of course, not many companies are reporting good earnings these days, are they? News Corp. lost $2.45 per share due to impairment charges for goodwill and intangible assets. Throwing that aside, the company earned 12 cents per share. Unfortunately, as you can imagine, that <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=asBjNm97.I24&amp;refer=us">came up well short of estimates</a> of 19 cents per share. Net sales dropped 8%.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/news-corp-s-q2-earnings-get-low-ratings/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>News Corp.'s Q2 earnings get low ratings </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/news-corp-s-q2-earnings-get-low-ratings/">News Corp.'s Q2 earnings get low ratings </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 06 Feb 2009 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=asBjNm97.I24&amp;refer=us>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/news-corp-s-q2-earnings-get-low-ratings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1451921/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/news-corp-s-q2-earnings-get-low-ratings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bill oreilly</category><category>BillOreilly</category><category>CBS</category><category>DIS</category><category>disney</category><category>featured</category><category>fox news channel</category><category>FoxNewsChannel</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>media</category><category>nbc universal</category><category>NbcUniversal</category><category>news corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>rupert murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><category>sean hannity</category><category>SeanHannity</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>via</category><category>viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is Jim Cramer 'The Grinch?' Fox seems to think so]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/17/is-jim-cramer-the-grinch-fox-seems-to-think-so/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/17/is-jim-cramer-the-grinch-fox-seems-to-think-so/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/17/is-jim-cramer-the-grinch-fox-seems-to-think-so/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/foxcard.jpg" />Is Jim Cramer the "Grinch who stole Christmas?" That's what his rivals at Fox Business Network want the world to think.<br /><br />According to <em>Talking Biz News</em>, the News Corp.-owned cable channel's holiday card features the head of the bombastic host of CNBC's "Mad Money" and chairman of my former employer <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/thestreet-com-inc/tscm/nas">TheStreet.com Inc. </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/thestreet-com-inc/tscm/nas">TSCM</a>) on the body of the Dr. Seuss character. Cramer, also a blogger here, is dyed green for good measure. <br /><br /> There is even a bit of verse that begins: "You're a mean one, Mr. Cramer; You rant and rave every day; You told us all that Bear was fine, there's nothing more to say." The poem goes on from there. You can read the whole thing <a href="http://weblogs.jomc.unc.edu/talkingbiznews/?p=6772">here</a>.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/17/is-jim-cramer-the-grinch-fox-seems-to-think-so/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is Jim Cramer 'The Grinch?' Fox seems to think so</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/17/is-jim-cramer-the-grinch-fox-seems-to-think-so/">Is Jim Cramer 'The Grinch?' Fox seems to think so</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:11:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://weblogs.jomc.unc.edu/talkingbiznews/?p=6772>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/17/is-jim-cramer-the-grinch-fox-seems-to-think-so/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1404479/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/17/is-jim-cramer-the-grinch-fox-seems-to-think-so/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cable ratings</category><category>CableRatings</category><category>CNBC</category><category>featured</category><category>fox business network</category><category>FoxBusinessNetwork</category><category>GE</category><category>JIm Cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>NWS</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:11:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Big trouble at The New York Times Company (NYT)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/big-trouble-at-the-new-york-times-company-nyt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/big-trouble-at-the-new-york-times-company-nyt/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/big-trouble-at-the-new-york-times-company-nyt/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">The New York Times</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">NYT</a>) reported that its <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/the-new-york-times-company-reports/rfid160237839">October revenue got beat up</a> again. If anything, it was worse than some previous months this year, but it's papers are caught in the vortex of a failing industry. For the month, advertising revenue was down 16.2%. Internet revenue only rose in the single digits, so online sales are not going to save the company. </p>
<p>In an odd way, the drop in revenue was the relative good news because the company also cut its dividend by a very large amount. The <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122723179085046695.html?mod=rss_media_and_marketing">payout was cut by 74% to $0.06</a> per share. To make matters worse, the stock sold off 10% to a 52-week low of $5.72.</p>
<p>NYT has debt that is due next year. Its papers in New England, led by the Boston Globe, are losing as much as 20% of their ad revenue each month.</p>
<p>The company is controlled by the Sulzberger family, which has been in charge for over a century. One of the reasons the brothers and sisters, aunt and cousins have supported management was for the rich payout they received each quarter. Now, that is going away.</p>
<p>With an unhappy family, the company may be in play. Perhaps Rupert Murdock might buy it. NYT would make a nice bookend for <em>The Wall Street Journal.</em></p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/big-trouble-at-the-new-york-times-company-nyt/">Big trouble at The New York Times Company (NYT)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122723179085046695.html?mod=rss_media_and_marketing>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/big-trouble-at-the-new-york-times-company-nyt/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1379100/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/big-trouble-at-the-new-york-times-company-nyt/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dividend</category><category>inthenews</category><category>new york times</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>NYT</category><category>rupert murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><category>Sulzberger</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch: The newspaper old guard is arrogant - and obsolete]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/rupert-murdoch-the-newspaper-old-guard-is-arrogant-and-obsole/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/rupert-murdoch-the-newspaper-old-guard-is-arrogant-and-obsole/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/rupert-murdoch-the-newspaper-old-guard-is-arrogant-and-obsole/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/rupert-murdoch-nws.jpg" />When <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>) CEO and media baron Rupert Murdoch speaks, people in the media business should listen. The 77 year-old tycoon has built an impressive array of media properties and is one of the few who gets it when it comes to how media should be created, by whom it should be created, and how it's consumed by different consumer segments.<br /><br />Recently, Murdoch indicated that the deeply troubled newspaper industry can survive only if <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-10787_3-10098194-60.html">editors and writers throw their egos</a> out the window and regain the trust and loyalty of their readers. The once monopolistic newspaper industry now competes with the 24/7 internet news trade and its army of well-informed bloggers and citizen journalists. If the old guard doesn't believe this is the new competition, then I hope they have a second career all lined up.<br /><br />Murdoch's words appear uncannily prescient: "My summary of the way some of the established media has responded to the internet is this: it's not newspapers that might become obsolete. It's some of the editors, reporters, and proprietors who are forgetting a newspaper's most precious asset: the bond with its readers." He goes on to say that the "paper on the porch" might go away, but daily news will not.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/rupert-murdoch-the-newspaper-old-guard-is-arrogant-and-obsole/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Rupert Murdoch: The newspaper old guard is arrogant - and obsolete</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/rupert-murdoch-the-newspaper-old-guard-is-arrogant-and-obsole/">Rupert Murdoch: The newspaper old guard is arrogant - and obsolete</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.cnet.com/8301-10787_3-10098194-60.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/rupert-murdoch-the-newspaper-old-guard-is-arrogant-and-obsole/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1374472/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/rupert-murdoch-the-newspaper-old-guard-is-arrogant-and-obsole/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bloggers</category><category>Editors</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>Newspapers</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch did not deliver for Wall Street in Q1]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/06/rupert-murdoch-did-not-deliver-for-wall-street-in-q1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/06/rupert-murdoch-did-not-deliver-for-wall-street-in-q1/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/06/rupert-murdoch-did-not-deliver-for-wall-street-in-q1/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>), whose competitors include <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) NBC Universal, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">Sony</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">SNE</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">Viacom</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>), reported earnings for the fiscal first quarter on Wednesday after the market closed. The stock was down over 11% in the after-hours trading session. <br /></p>
<p>What happened? Do you really need to ask? Hard times beget hard guidance, my friends. CEO Rupert Murdoch is trying to be honest with his shareholders. News Corp. is bracing for a slowdown in advertising and DVD sales. And as for the bottom line, the media conglomerate didn't beat estimates with its Q1 net income of $0.20 per share. Wall Street was looking for three more pennies.<br /> </p>
<p>Revenue increased 6%, at least. However, according to the <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/news-corporation-reports-first-quarter/rfid155578686">press release</a>, one of my favorite metrics dipped severely during Q1. Granted, this is only the first quarter, but net cash from operations took a hideous plunge of 70%. I'm sure Murdoch didn't like seeing that. One thing I hope he takes very seriously is the need to cut costs. He stated that this will be a priority. <br /></p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/06/rupert-murdoch-did-not-deliver-for-wall-street-in-q1/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Rupert Murdoch did not deliver for Wall Street in Q1</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/06/rupert-murdoch-did-not-deliver-for-wall-street-in-q1/">Rupert Murdoch did not deliver for Wall Street in Q1</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 06 Nov 2008 08:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/E/EARNS_NEWS_CORP?SITE=DCUSN&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/06/rupert-murdoch-did-not-deliver-for-wall-street-in-q1/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1363841/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/06/rupert-murdoch-did-not-deliver-for-wall-street-in-q1/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CBS</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>inthenews</category><category>NBC Universal</category><category>NbcUniversal</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><category>SNE</category><category>Sony</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 08:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Would a sequel to "Wall Street" help Fox Business Channel?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/would-a-sequel-to-wall-street-help-fox-business-channel/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/would-a-sequel-to-wall-street-help-fox-business-channel/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/would-a-sequel-to-wall-street-help-fox-business-channel/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/rupert-murdoch.jpg"  alt="" />Okay, here is an absolutely brilliant idea. And no, I'm not being sarcastic. According to this <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3ibc7ed676383467c204a6c20ba3fbfca9?imw=Y">blurb</a> at <em>The Hollywood Reporter</em>, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>) is interested in doing a sequel to the classic 1987 film <em>Wall Street</em>.</p>
<p> Some of you younger investors out there might not be familiar with the movie, but perhaps you're familiar with the now-famous quote "Greed, for lack of a better word, is good." It was uttered by the loathsome Gordon Gekko, whose alliterative name almost oozes corporate scandal and villainy. That character was played by Michael Douglas. <em>Wall Street</em> was directed by Oliver Stone and it portrayed the evil side of capitalism, replete with insider trading and share-price manipulation. It's considered a classic, iconic fictional snapshot of the current zeitgeist at the time: the only thing that mattered was upward mobility and accumulation of as much net worth as conceivable without consideration for the little guy. It came out around the time of the '87 market crash, so it had that going for it. </p>
<p>This is why News Corp. needs to fast-track the project. According to this <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/05/movies/05movi.html?ex=1336017600&amp;en=64f8ac17912072b8&amp;ei=5090&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss">source</a> from May of last year, a sequel to <em>Wall Street</em> was already in the works. Obviously, the fact that The Hollywood Reporter mentioned the project this week means that execs at Fox feel that the timing for a sequel is approaching an optimal point. In fact, they really should try to get it out into the marketplace as quickly as they can, and hopefully with Michael Douglas reprising his role as Gekko (Douglas' return is not set in stone at this point). Not only could the movie gross a decent amount at the box office, but think of the synergy potential here. </p>
<p>News Corp. is fighting a battle with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) CNBC as we speak. The Fox Business Channel wants to take away as many viewers as possible from the stock-market network. Problem is, CNBC is a very powerful brand in its arena. Of course, that doesn't deter the pit bulls at Fox. If you had to describe the media company with only one word, that word would, by necessity, be a hyphenate: ultra-competitive. In fact, Fox Business Channel recently slammed BloggingStocks' own Jim Cramer in a recent promo (see a piece on this subject by <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/13/fox-business-blasts-jim-cramer-in-commercial-must-see/">Zac Bissonnette</a>). </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/would-a-sequel-to-wall-street-help-fox-business-channel/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Would a sequel to "Wall Street" help Fox Business Channel?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/would-a-sequel-to-wall-street-help-fox-business-channel/">Would a sequel to "Wall Street" help Fox Business Channel?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 15 Oct 2008 09:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/05/movies/05movi.html?ex=1336017600&amp;en=64f8ac17912072b8&amp;ei=5090&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3ibc7ed676383467c204a6c20ba3fbfca9?imw=Y>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/13/fox-business-blasts-jim-cramer-in-commercial-must-see/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/would-a-sequel-to-wall-street-help-fox-business-channel/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1342556/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/would-a-sequel-to-wall-street-help-fox-business-channel/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alexis glick</category><category>AlexisGlick</category><category>Bill OReilly</category><category>BillOreilly</category><category>CNBC</category><category>Dagan McDowell</category><category>DaganMcdowell</category><category>featured</category><category>Fox Business Channel</category><category>Fox News Channel</category><category>FoxBusinessChannel</category><category>FoxNewsChannel</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>Gordon Gekko</category><category>GordonGekko</category><category>Jim Cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>Michael Douglas</category><category>MichaelDouglas</category><category>neil cavuto</category><category>NeilCavuto</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><category>Wall Street</category><category>Wall Street Journal</category><category>WallStreet</category><category>WallStreetJournal</category><category>zac bissonnette</category><category>ZacBissonnette</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 09:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Obama vs. O'Reilly should be a ratings blockbuster for Fox]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/03/obama-vs-oreilly-should-be-a-ratings-blockbuster-for-fox/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/03/obama-vs-oreilly-should-be-a-ratings-blockbuster-for-fox/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/03/obama-vs-oreilly-should-be-a-ratings-blockbuster-for-fox/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/conventions-and-conferences/" rel="tag">Conventions and Conferences</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/billoreillypic.jpg" alt="" />Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama is about to enter the "No Spin Zone."<br /><br />The Illinois senator is due to be interviewed by Fox News' Bill O'Reilly, host of the "The O'Reilly Factor," on Thursday, the final night of The Republican National Convention, <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/fnc/long_time_coming_oreilly_to_interview_obama_thursday_93313.asp">according to TVNewser.com.</a> I am sure executives at Fox parent company <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corp. </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>) were high-fiving each other when that interview was secured. The clash between the suave Obama and the bellicose O'Reilly will make for interesting television. It will be like a car accident on the highway that people can't help themselves from gawking at.<br /><br />Maybe Obama views it as a chance to show his supporters that he is not afraid of O'Reilly, who is a pussy cat compared with Russian strongman Vladimir Putin. It's also <a href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/09/mccain-media-at.html">quite a contrast to the strategy</a> of Republican John McCain, who is keeping the media at an arm's length. His campaign even canceled an interview the candidate had scheduled with CNN's Larry King because it did not like the <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/politics/brown_v_bounds_on_election_center_93231.asp">tough questions anchor Campbell Brown </a>asked its spokesman about the qualifiicaitons of his running-mate Sarah Palin.<br /><br />Both the Democratic and Republican conventions have been a dream come true for the cable news channels. More <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/sep/02/tvratings.democrats2008">people tuned into CNN</a>, which is owned by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner Inc</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>), for Obama's acceptance than for Fox, MSNBC and the broadcast networks. The address got more viewers than the American Idol final, the Oscars, or the opening ceremony of the Beijing Olympics.<br /><br />Fox, though, continues to attract more viewers overall, especially during the Republican get-together in St. Paul. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric Co.'s</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) MSNBC is gaining viewers too, though some may be curious to see if its <a href="http://www.salon.com/5things/2008/08/27/msnbc_anchors_feud_o/index.html">feuding on-air personalities will break into a fist fight.</a> All three of the cable news networks are raking in major bucks from those annoying 30-second TV spots that are an unfortunate part of American political life.<br /><br />A winner has already emerged from the Obama-O'Reilly confrontation before a single punch has been thrown: News Corp. head Rupert Murdoch. The media baron lusts for the power to set the nation's political agenda. Come Thursday night, that's exactly what he will be able to do.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/03/obama-vs-oreilly-should-be-a-ratings-blockbuster-for-fox/">Obama vs. O'Reilly should be a ratings blockbuster for Fox</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/fnc/long_time_coming_oreilly_to_interview_obama_thursday_93313.asp>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/03/obama-vs-oreilly-should-be-a-ratings-blockbuster-for-fox/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1303122/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/03/obama-vs-oreilly-should-be-a-ratings-blockbuster-for-fox/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barack Obama</category><category>BarackObama</category><category>bill oreilly</category><category>BillOreilly</category><category>Cambell Brown</category><category>CambellBrown</category><category>cnn</category><category>democrats</category><category>fox news</category><category>fox news channel</category><category>FoxNews</category><category>FoxNewsChannel</category><category>inthenews</category><category>John McCain</category><category>JohnMccain</category><category>MSNBC</category><category>NWS</category><category>OReilly Factor</category><category>OreillyFactor</category><category>presidential election</category><category>PresidentialElection</category><category>republicans</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><category>Sarah Palin</category><category>SarahPalin</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch dreams of owning The New York Times]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/03/rupert-murdoch-dreams-of-owning-the-new-york-times-nyt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/03/rupert-murdoch-dreams-of-owning-the-new-york-times-nyt/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/03/rupert-murdoch-dreams-of-owning-the-new-york-times-nyt/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><p>Rupert Murdoch, CEO of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corp</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>) and king of all he surveys, wants to buy <em>The New York Times</em>. At least that is what he told <em>Vanity Fair</em> <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSN0245553920080903">according to</a> a <em>Reuters </em>report. </p>
<p>It is hard to see why Murdoch would even bother to dream that dream. Based on the most recent quarterly earnings report and monthly figures reported by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">The New York Times Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">NYT</a>), the paper probably loses money when the results of its online business are backed out. If ad lineage at the print product keeps falling, and it will, even NYTimes.com will not be able to save the bottom line.</p>
<p>While <em>The New York Times</em> is a trophy, it would almost certainly be an expensive one. The parent company has a market cap of about $2 billion, and the paper might go for more than that because of its unique position as the most respected news outlet in the US.</p>
<p>Murdoch is probably already struggling with <em>The Wall Street Journal. </em>He has to be. Newspaper ad revenue is simply dropping too fast for the <em>Journal </em>to be immune.</p>
<p>Owning another paper is just asking for more losses which would need to be offset by other businesses at News Corp.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/03/rupert-murdoch-dreams-of-owning-the-new-york-times-nyt/">Rupert Murdoch dreams of owning The New York Times</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 03 Sep 2008 09:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSN0245553920080903>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/03/rupert-murdoch-dreams-of-owning-the-new-york-times-nyt/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1302847/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/03/rupert-murdoch-dreams-of-owning-the-new-york-times-nyt/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>media</category><category>newspapers</category><category>NWS</category><category>NYT</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 09:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why do we do business with Russia?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/06/why-do-we-do-business-with-russia/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/06/why-do-we-do-business-with-russia/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/06/why-do-we-do-business-with-russia/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/russia/" rel="tag">Russia</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/omx/" rel="tag">OfficeMax Inc (OMX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bp/" rel="tag">BP p.l.c. ADS (BP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/russian-president-vladimir-putin.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /> Russian business runs on different rules. <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corp.'s</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>) Rupert Murdoch, who has been doing business in China for years, is nervous about his Russian enterprises. This morning, the FBI announced it had rounded up a ring of data thieves, many from former Soviet Union countries. And then there's the little matter of BP-TNK, a joint venture between <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bp-p-l-c/bp/nys">BP</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bp-p-l-c/bp/nys">BP</a>) and a Russian company, whose Russian shareholders are booting out its Western executives so they can take over the operation.</p>
<p>Here's what <em><a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/8/murdoch-i-ll-do-business-anywhere-except-for-russia-nws-#slide_4">Silicon Alley insider</a></em> reports Murdoch had to say about doing business in Russia: "We have great growing business there but just -- this is purely me, I'm sorry, I'm -- the more I read about investments in Russia, the less I like the feel of it. The more successful we'd be, the more vulnerable we'd be to have it stolen from us, so there we sell now."</p>
<p>In case you missed it, The <em><a href="http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080806/BLOG01/80806040/1001/NEWS">Detroit Free Press</a></em> reports that an international ring of data thieves used wardriving -- the practice of stealing data from unprotected Wi-Fi networks -- to take 40 million identities, use the information to print fake ATM cards, and steal millions of dollars. The corporate victims include customers of <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/tjx-companies-incorporated/tjx/nys">TJX</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/tjx-companies-incorporated/tjx/nys">TJX</a>), <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barnes-and-noble-inc/bks/nys">Barnes &amp; Noble</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barnes-and-noble-inc/bks/nys">BKS</a>), and <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/officemax-incorporated/omx/nys">OfficeMax</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/officemax-incorporated/omx/nys">OMX</a>). Five of the 11 defendants are from former Soviet Union countries -- "one is from Estonia, three are from Ukraine, and one is from Belarus."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/06/why-do-we-do-business-with-russia/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Why do we do business with Russia?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/06/why-do-we-do-business-with-russia/">Why do we do business with Russia?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 06 Aug 2008 13:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/06/why-do-we-do-business-with-russia/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1277130/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/06/why-do-we-do-business-with-russia/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barnes</category><category>barnes and noble</category><category>BarnesAndNoble</category><category>bp</category><category>george bush</category><category>GeorgeBush</category><category>inthenews</category><category>news corp</category><category>news corp.</category><category>news corporation</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NewsCorporation</category><category>offiicemax</category><category>rupert murdoch</category><category>rupert murdoch offer...</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><category>RupertMurdochOffer...</category><category>tjx</category><category>tjx companies</category><category>TjxCompanies</category><category>tjxcos</category><category>vladimir putin</category><category>VladimirPutin</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 13:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[News Corp. (NWS) may not be a buy right now]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/06/news-corp-nws-may-not-be-a-buy-right-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/06/news-corp-nws-may-not-be-a-buy-right-now/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/06/news-corp-nws-may-not-be-a-buy-right-now/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>), a competitor of media entities such as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">Viacom</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>) <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) NBC Universal, reported its Q4 and full-year <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/news-corporation-reports-record-full/rfid128040257">numbers</a> on Tuesday. Unfortunately, the stock received an after-hours yawn from investors. The share price didn't move much at all, about a nickel (the stock was up almost 5% on the day, however). The stats seemed pretty good in an overall sense, but they weren't overly compelling either, and I'm not sure I'd want to enter a position in News Corp. at the moment due to questions about the softening advertising market for television stations. But let's look at the data.</p>
<p>For the quarter, revenues increased over 16% and earnings per diluted share jumped over 50% to $0.43. There were, however, some asset gains thrown into that number. News Corp. likes to focus on operating income, and that metric grew 21% in Q4. Every operating segment, except for television, saw an increase in its profits. For the full year, revenues increased 15% and earnings per diluted share soared almost 68% to $1.81. Again, operating income gives a better account of performance due to the asset transactions affecting the bottom line, and here we see the growth is closer to 21%. For the full year, every operating segment saw growth. </p>
<p>News Corp.'s studio and cable divisions are doing well, and like I said, in a general sense, this was a good report. Plus, Fox Interactive Media saw its top line expand by well over 50%, driven by MySpace. But Rupert Murdoch has expressed some caution in terms of growth going forward. According to this <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articlehybrid.aspx?type=comktNews&amp;rpc=33&amp;storyid=2008-08-06T014847Z_01_WNAB5069_RTRIDST_0_BUSINESS-NEWSCORP-RESULTS-DC.XML">article</a>, he sees growth ahead, but it won't be of the stellar variety. And I'll add that operational cash flow for the year was down over 4%. I'd rather see that metric rise on a twelve-month basis. News Corp.'s shares seem cheap to me, but I don't feel compelled at this point to start a position. Given the current economic climate, I'd rather sit on the sidelines and wait for some more data.</p>
<p><em>Disclosure: I own Disney and GE; positions can change at any time.</em> </p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/06/news-corp-nws-may-not-be-a-buy-right-now/">News Corp. (NWS) may not be a buy right now</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 06 Aug 2008 08:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/news-corporation-reports-record-full/rfid128040257>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/06/news-corp-nws-may-not-be-a-buy-right-now/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1276589/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/06/news-corp-nws-may-not-be-a-buy-right-now/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CBS</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>inthenews</category><category>media industry</category><category>MediaIndustry</category><category>MySpace</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 08:33:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
