<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Is Berkshire Hathaway better than S&amp;P Index?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/is-berkshire-hathaway-better-than-sandp-index/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/is-berkshire-hathaway-better-than-sandp-index/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/is-berkshire-hathaway-better-than-sandp-index/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ko/" rel="tag">Coca-Cola (KO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hd/" rel="tag">Home Depot (HD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/axp/" rel="tag">American Express (AXP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cop/" rel="tag">ConocoPhillips (COP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/low/" rel="tag">Lowe's Cos (LOW)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/kft/" rel="tag">Kraft Foods'A' (KFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfc/" rel="tag">Wells Fargo (WFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bni/" rel="tag">Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/usb/" rel="tag">U.S. Bancorp (USB)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/berkshire-hathaway-brk.a-logo.gif" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Except for the chosen ones -- CEOs and the like who have outrageous salary and benefit packages -- almost nobody has been able to escape the financial pain in the world today.</p>
<p>'My pal Warren,' Chairman of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-a/brk.a/nys">Berkshire Hathaway</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-a/brk.a/nys">BRK.A</a> and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-b/brk.b/nys">BRK.B</a>), who only draws a $100,000 salary, has watched his net worth diminished by billions of dollars as his stock has unraveled like everything else. I last read Buffett had a 31% stake in Berkshire so he understands his shareholders angst, even if he does not feel their pain. The stock has dropped from a 52-week high of $151,650 to yesterday's close of $77,500 for a loss of 49%.<br /></p>
<p>Once again in quarterly SEC filings Berkshire's holdings were released and I could not help but wonder if this great holding company had not become one more giant index fund. There are a lot of quality names in the mix including: <br /></p>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/burlington-northern-santa-fe-corporation/bni/nys">Burlington Northern Santa Fe</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/burlington-northern-santa-fe-corporation/bni/nys"> BNI</a>) </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-coca-cola-company/ko/nys">Coca-Cola</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-coca-cola-company/ko/nys">KO</a>) </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/conocophillips/cop/nys">ConocoPhillips</a> (NYSE; <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/conocophillips/cop/nys">COP</a>) </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-johnson/jnj/nys">Johnson and Johnson</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-johnson/jnj/nys">JNJ</a>) </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kraft-foods-inc/kft/nys">Kraft Foods'A'</a> (: NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kraft-foods-inc/kft/nys">KFT</a>) </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys">Procter and Gamble</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys">PG</a>) </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/us-bancorp-del/usb/nys">U.S. Bancorp</a> (: NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/us-bancorp-del/usb/nys">USB</a>) </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wells-fargo-and-company/wfc/nys">Wells Fargo</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wells-fargo-and-company/wfc/nys">WFC</a>) </li>
</ul>
<p>The above referenced stocks are all down with the market and there are still more that might be considered fallen angels or turn-around plays within Berkshire's holdings that include:</p>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-express-company/axp/nys">American Express</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-express-company/axp/nys">AXP</a>) </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs Group</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-home-depot-inc/hd/nys">Home Depot </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-home-depot-inc/hd/nys">HD</a>) </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lowe-s-companies-inc/low/nys">Lowe's Cos</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lowe-s-companies-inc/low/nys">LOW</a>) </li>
</ul>
<p> </p>
<p>In addition to these publicly traded stocks Berkshire holdings include privately held Geico Insurance, See's Candies, Dairy Queen, Florsheim Shoes, and a multitude of others. Since so many stocks have been accumulated over the years I started to view BRK as a stock index and with that in mind did some comparisons between the Standard &amp; Poors 500 and BRK.</p>
<p>The following is a three-year chart that illustrates that buying BRK instead of the index anytime in the last three years would have been beneficial by a 30% margin.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/is-berkshire-hathaway-better-than-sandp-index/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is Berkshire Hathaway better than S&amp;P Index?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/is-berkshire-hathaway-better-than-sandp-index/">Is Berkshire Hathaway better than S&amp;P Index?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/is-berkshire-hathaway-better-than-sandp-index/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1378029/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/is-berkshire-hathaway-better-than-sandp-index/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AXP</category><category>BNI</category><category>BRK.A</category><category>BRK.B</category><category>COP</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>GS</category><category>HD</category><category>indexes</category><category>indexfunds</category><category>JNJ</category><category>KFT</category><category>KO</category><category>LOW</category><category>PG</category><category>recovery</category><category>Sheldon Lber</category><category>SheldonLber</category><category>SP Index</category><category>SpIndex</category><category>USB</category><category>WarrenBuffett</category><category>WFC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dow, S&amp;P near all-time highs while economy slumps. Why?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/26/dow-sandp-near-all-time-highs-while-economy-slumps-why/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/26/dow-sandp-near-all-time-highs-while-economy-slumps-why/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/26/dow-sandp-near-all-time-highs-while-economy-slumps-why/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a></p><p><img id="vimage_1" alt="indices at 1:06 p.m., september 26, 2006" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/09/indices_092606_106pm.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />I'm looking at my screen and I rub my eyes. Could it be? On the left-hand column I read a headline, "<a class="bold80" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB115924070878573998.html?mod=hps_us_pageone">Slowing Economy Spurs Bond Rally</a>." Over there in the side bar is the cute box that shows the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the S&amp;P 500. <a href="http://money.aol.com/marketnews">The chart spikes peppily</a>. "11610.55" is the bright number next to DJIA. "1330.60" reads the S&amp;P 500 -- its five-year high. [<strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/marketnews/article">Update</a></strong>: at market close, the S&amp;P 500 had hit a brand-new five-year high of 1336.34, with the DJIA at its 2006 high and second-highest close ever, 16669.39.] The world is full of bright, happy green that seems to belie the sad economic data, the slow in advertising, the doom for American autos.</p>
<p>Could it be true?</p>
<p>It seems as if it is. One <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?dist=newsfinder&amp;siteid=google&amp;guid=%7BFCD20848-4AF5-44CB-AF4E-A800735D807D%7D&amp;keyword">one side we have the DJIA and the S&amp;P 500</a>. The Dow's all-time high is 11,750 (<strike>140</strike> 90-ish points away), while the all-time closing high is only 11,722 (that's <strike>111.45 </strike>52.61 points away from right now, if you're counting along with me). The S&amp;P is raring to go, as well, creeping ever so slowly up towards its all-time high of 1,552 (although it's still <strike>222</strike> 215 points away, <strike>16.6% </strike>16.1%). Strikingly, the current level is higher than the index has been for five-and-a-half years.</p>
<p>And yet, still, economy <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aHp1L4w7Ql3U&amp;refer=home">slumps</a>, <a href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,16849-2364029,00.html">slows</a>, <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D8KCGR800.htm">dips</a>, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601082&amp;sid=a8L.t6R914z0&amp;refer=canada">weakens</a>. Why are <a href="http://articles.news.aol.com/business/_a/consumer-confidence-rises-factory-index/20060926100409990004?cid=403">consumers so confident</a>, why are investors eagerly buying up stocks, while the rest of the indicators seem to warn them away? I've searched my brain for a creative answer, and can't discover one. What do <em>you </em>think?</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/26/dow-sandp-near-all-time-highs-while-economy-slumps-why/">Dow, S&amp;P near all-time highs while economy slumps. Why?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:37:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/26/dow-sandp-near-all-time-highs-while-economy-slumps-why/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/675180/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/26/dow-sandp-near-all-time-highs-while-economy-slumps-why/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>11722</category><category>11750</category><category>all-time high</category><category>all-time highs</category><category>All-timeHigh</category><category>All-timeHighs</category><category>djia</category><category>dow</category><category>dow index</category><category>DowIndex</category><category>economy</category><category>high</category><category>highs</category><category>indexes</category><category>indices</category><category>nasdaq</category><category>nasdaq index</category><category>NasdaqIndex</category><category>sandp</category><category>sp</category><category>sp 500</category><category>sp index</category><category>Sp500</category><category>SpIndex</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:37:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
