<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Closing Bell: Slight Climb Throughout the Day (GE)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/23/closing-bell-slight-climb-throughout-the-day-ge/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/23/closing-bell-slight-climb-throughout-the-day-ge/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/23/closing-bell-slight-climb-throughout-the-day-ge/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nasdaq/" rel="tag">NASDAQ</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-green.jpg" />Trading for the day started slowly. As is true most summer Fridays, there was not much news and few earnings announcements. Those who had to work on Wall Street spent the morning waiting for stress test data on European banks. The data was due at noon and there were no surprises. Seven smaller financial firms out of 91 did not make the cut. None of the firms was considered strategically important.<br />
<br />
The S&amp;P did move about 1,100, a sign that the movement up in the market has been steady enough to move above a psychological hurdle. But, the move was on so little volume that early Monday will be a better barometer of the market's sentiment.<br />
<br />
The numbers:<br />
<br />
Dow 10,424.62 +102.32 (0.99%) <br />
S&amp;P 500 1,102.66 +8.99 (0.82%) <br />
Nasdaq 2,269.47 +23.58 (1.05%)<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/23/closing-bell-slight-climb-throughout-the-day-ge/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Closing Bell: Slight Climb Throughout the Day (GE)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/23/closing-bell-slight-climb-throughout-the-day-ge/">Closing Bell: Slight Climb Throughout the Day (GE)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/23/closing-bell-slight-climb-throughout-the-day-ge/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19566736/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/23/closing-bell-slight-climb-throughout-the-day-ge/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GE</category><category>sp</category><category>stress tests</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[James Altucher: Stocks Heading to New Highs]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/06/james-altucher-stocks-heading-to-new-highs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/06/james-altucher-stocks-heading-to-new-highs/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/06/james-altucher-stocks-heading-to-new-highs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bargain-stocks/" rel="tag">Bargain Stocks</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/" rel="tag">Chasing Value[TM]</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stock-picks/" rel="tag">Stock Picks</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/05/bha0016.jpg" alt="" />James Altucher, a managing partner at Formula Capital as well as a regular contributor to <em><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/writers/james-altucher/">DailyFinance</a>,</em> says the S&amp;P 500 is going to 1500. He argues that now is the time for investors buy stocks. Appearing on <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/center-bancorp-inc/cnbc/nas" class="inlinked">CNBC's</a> Squawk Box Tuesday morning with economist Nouriel Roubini, Altucher argued that the economy is improving and stocks are cheap trading at about 10 times <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/category/earnings/" class="inlinked">earnings</a> (compared to the historical average of 15 times earnings). As a result, he says that investing in stocks now makes sense. <br />
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/06/james-altucher-stocks-heading-to-new-highs/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>James Altucher: Stocks Heading to New Highs</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/06/james-altucher-stocks-heading-to-new-highs/">James Altucher: Stocks Heading to New Highs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 06 Jul 2010 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/06/james-altucher-stocks-heading-to-new-highs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19543559/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/06/james-altucher-stocks-heading-to-new-highs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>investing</category><category>IP</category><category>james altucher</category><category>SP</category><category>stocks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nikhil Hutheesing]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Closing Bell: Technical Relief On Groundhog Day (GE, JPM, F, AMTD, RPRX, LXK)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/02/closing-bell-technical-relief-on-groundhog-day-ge-jpm-f-amt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/02/closing-bell-technical-relief-on-groundhog-day-ge-jpm-f-amt/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/02/closing-bell-technical-relief-on-groundhog-day-ge-jpm-f-amt/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amtd/" rel="tag">TD AmeriTrade Holding (AMTD)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-green.jpg" />Today was helped in part by housing data for December showing gains on the existing home sales front, but was mostly a sentiment reversal. The S&amp;P closing back above 1,085 yesterday created the hope that a floor was being put in and the stocks followed some strength in Europe to post larger gains. <br />
<br />
Here were today's unofficial closing bell levels:<br />
<br />
Dow 	10,297.00 	+111.47 	(1.09%) <br />
S&amp;P 500 	1,103.11 	+13.93 	(1.28%) <br />
Nasdaq 	2,189.68 	+18.48 	(0.85%)<br />
<br />
<a href="http://247wallst.com/2010/02/02/top-analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades-amd-aa-axp-apc-cof-dfs-xom-fcx-ma-q-schn-pcu-v/">Top Analyst Upgrades/Downgrades</a><br />
<a href="http://247wallst.com/2010/02/02/top-day-trader-alerts-citp-dhi-lxk-siri/">Top Day Trader Alerts</a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/02/closing-bell-technical-relief-on-groundhog-day-ge-jpm-f-amt/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Closing Bell: Technical Relief On Groundhog Day (GE, JPM, F, AMTD, RPRX, LXK)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/02/closing-bell-technical-relief-on-groundhog-day-ge-jpm-f-amt/">Closing Bell: Technical Relief On Groundhog Day (GE, JPM, F, AMTD, RPRX, LXK)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/02/closing-bell-technical-relief-on-groundhog-day-ge-jpm-f-amt/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19342151/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/02/closing-bell-technical-relief-on-groundhog-day-ge-jpm-f-amt/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>europe</category><category>fidelity</category><category>housing</category><category>ishares</category><category>lexmark</category><category>Repros Therapeutics</category><category>ReprosTherapeutics</category><category>SP</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Market ends the day lower, but up for the month]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/30/market-ends-the-day-lower-but-up-for-the-month/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/30/market-ends-the-day-lower-but-up-for-the-month/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/30/market-ends-the-day-lower-but-up-for-the-month/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="stocks post gains in september" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/wstreet.jpg" />The market was able to stage a late day rally which erased some of its earlier losses, but still ended the day in the red, with all <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125430911982652263.html?mod=rss_markets_main">3 major indexes closing down</a> on the day.<br /><br />September is typically not a good month for the market, but even with today's losses this September was positive, as more and more investors have started to believe the economy is coming out of its recession.<br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/30/market-ends-the-day-lower-but-up-for-the-month/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Market ends the day lower, but up for the month</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/30/market-ends-the-day-lower-but-up-for-the-month/">Market ends the day lower, but up for the month</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/30/market-ends-the-day-lower-but-up-for-the-month/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19179967/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/30/market-ends-the-day-lower-but-up-for-the-month/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DJIA</category><category>Dow Jones</category><category>DowJones</category><category>GDP</category><category>Nasdaq</category><category>rebound</category><category>SP</category><category>stock market</category><category>StockMarket</category><category>stocks</category><category>third quarter</category><category>ThirdQuarter</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Home prices move a bit higher]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/29/home-prices-move-a-bit-higher/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/29/home-prices-move-a-bit-higher/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/29/home-prices-move-a-bit-higher/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/house.jpg" alt="" />A little more good news for the struggling housing market Tuesday, as a closely watched home price index showed <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/real-estate/new-data-shows-more-home-price-gains/638481">increases in prices for the third straight month</a> in July.</p>
<p>The news comes from the Standard &amp; Poor's/Case-Shiller home price index, which shows that home prices rose by 1.2% from June to July.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/29/home-prices-move-a-bit-higher/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Home prices move a bit higher</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/29/home-prices-move-a-bit-higher/">Home prices move a bit higher</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 29 Sep 2009 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/29/home-prices-move-a-bit-higher/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19177962/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/29/home-prices-move-a-bit-higher/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>home prices</category><category>homes</category><category>housing</category><category>inthenews</category><category>real estate</category><category>recession</category><category>Shiller index</category><category>SP</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[S&amp;P 500 option traders still bullish]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/28/sandp-500-option-traders-still-bullish/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/28/sandp-500-option-traders-still-bullish/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/28/sandp-500-option-traders-still-bullish/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/makeover-23-200cm101608.jpg" />The S&amp;P 500 may be down slightly this Friday afternoon after a fairly flat week, but that does not mean that all traders are bearish. In fact, option traders still appear to be quite bullish. Investors buying call options still outnumber put option buyers by more than 2 to 1 in the <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/spdr-trust-series-1/spy/nys">S&amp;P 500 SPDRs ETF</a> (<a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/spdr-trust-series-1/spy/nys">SPY</a>) for the September at-the-money strike price.<br /><br />When a traders buys a call option they think the stock is going to go up, and when they buy puts they think the stock may go down. The ratio between calls and puts is often looked at as a reflection of underlying trader sentiment. Significant changes in this balance may indicate that sentiment is changing.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/28/sandp-500-option-traders-still-bullish/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>S&amp;P 500 option traders still bullish</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/28/sandp-500-option-traders-still-bullish/">S&amp;P 500 option traders still bullish</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/28/sandp-500-option-traders-still-bullish/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19144078/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/28/sandp-500-option-traders-still-bullish/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>options</category><category>S P</category><category>SP</category><category>SPY</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Jagerson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Corporate bond market rally]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/corporate-bond-market-rally/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/corporate-bond-market-rally/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/corporate-bond-market-rally/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a></p><em>This post was written by <a href="http://www.minyanville.com">Minyanville</a> contributor Fil Zucchi.</em><br /><br />It's well known by now that the corporate bond market, from high yield to investment grade, has had a mind numbing move up, and this rally is beginning to be used as an explanation/reason why the equity markets will have no choice but to follow suit. To keep things in perspective, here are some comments from last week conference call by the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys"><strong>Morgan Stanley</strong></a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys">MS</a>) corporate credit team:<br /><br />
<ul>
    <li>Despite the deleveraging process many companies have undertaken, on an EBITDA/Debt ratio junk rated companies are as leveraged as they have ever been thanks to the "<em>complete trashing</em>" of cash flows. MS expects leverage ratios to rise even further and, therefore, from a "leverage-risk to yield" basis, junk spreads are way too tight to reward buyers for the underlying default risk.</li>
    <li>In the residential Option ARMs market, delinquency rates as a percentage of original balances are running higher than they were in subprime. On the other side of the ledger - and confirming what is intuitively logical - recoveries as a percentage of balances are significantly lower and falling, which will continue to put heavy pressure on home values. In the Alt-A market things are not going that well either.</li>
    <li>   In the <strong>Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities</strong> (CMBS) world, Standard &amp; Poor recently implemented new tests to determine the downgrade of various CMBS vintages. The test for the 2004 issues was relaxed, which is likely to spare from downgrade 65% of AAA rated CMBS which had been put on negative watch. Under the prior, stricter test, 80% of the watch list issues were in danger of downgrades. Are we really to believe that the relaxation of the testing standards for issues that are coming up for refi between now and the next two years are just a coincidence?</li>
    <li> What caritas the S &amp; P showed toward the 2004 CMBS it apparently took it out on the mezzanine CMBS of 2006 and later. Most AAA mezz tranches are or will be downgraded to A/BBB- grades, while all junior AAAs tranches have gone straight to junk. </li>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/corporate-bond-market-rally/">Corporate bond market rally</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.minyanville.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/corporate-bond-market-rally/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19096110/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/corporate-bond-market-rally/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ALT-A</category><category>cmbs</category><category>corporate bonds</category><category>CorporateBonds</category><category>inthenews</category><category>ms</category><category>option ARMs</category><category>OptionArms</category><category>SP</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Harrison]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[What are the guesstimates for Friday's unemployment report?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/01/what-are-the-guesstimates-for-fridays-unemployment-report/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/01/what-are-the-guesstimates-for-fridays-unemployment-report/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/01/what-are-the-guesstimates-for-fridays-unemployment-report/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/unemploymentpicture.jpg" />On Friday June 5, the <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aIq.yiT0.KuI&amp;refer=home">U.S. Labor Department will release</a> the unemployment numbers for May. Here are some guesstimates from leading economists:</p>
<ul>
    <li>The median of 59 estimates will show that unemployment is at 9.2%, the highest since 1983. </li>
    <li>The jobless rate may reach 10% by the end of the year. </li>
    <li>Estimates are that payrolls fell by 521,000 in May after declining by 539,000 in April. </li>
    <li>The median of 60 estimates showed the job losses peaked at 741,000 in January. </li>
    <li>The economy has lost 5.7 million jobs since December 2007. </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/01/what-are-the-guesstimates-for-fridays-unemployment-report/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>What are the guesstimates for Friday's unemployment report?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/01/what-are-the-guesstimates-for-fridays-unemployment-report/">What are the guesstimates for Friday's unemployment report?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 01 Jun 2009 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aIq.yiT0.KuI&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/01/what-are-the-guesstimates-for-fridays-unemployment-report/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19052811/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/01/what-are-the-guesstimates-for-fridays-unemployment-report/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chrysler</category><category>gm</category><category>institute for supply management</category><category>InstituteForSupplyManagement</category><category>manufacturing index</category><category>ManufacturingIndex</category><category>SP</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The stakes are high for US government bonds]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/28/the-stakes-are-high-for-us-government-bonds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/28/the-stakes-are-high-for-us-government-bonds/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/28/the-stakes-are-high-for-us-government-bonds/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/economy.jpg" /><em>This post was written by</em><a href="http://www.minyanville.com"><em> Minyanville</em></a><em> contributor James Kostohryz.</em> <br /><br /> <a style="color: rgb(42, 93, 176);" href="http://www.minyanville.com/buzz/bookmark.php?id=106138&amp;s=m&amp;context=search&amp;chars=1" target="_blank">As per the trade I laid out yesterday</a>, with today's durable goods orders number that was significantly better than expected, we might be looking at<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><strong>S&amp;P</strong><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>930 today rather than sub 900 if the market had not gotten blindsided by yesterday's sudden plunge in long bonds. That's what stops are for.<br /><br />But let's put this in perspective: A 12-point drop between yesterday's high of around 913 and the current level of 901 is small potatoes relative to what is at stake here.<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/28/the-stakes-are-high-for-us-government-bonds/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The stakes are high for US government bonds</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/28/the-stakes-are-high-for-us-government-bonds/">The stakes are high for US government bonds</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 28 May 2009 14:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.minyanville.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/28/the-stakes-are-high-for-us-government-bonds/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19050536/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/28/the-stakes-are-high-for-us-government-bonds/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bonds</category><category>dollar</category><category>inthenews</category><category>SP</category><category>US</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Harrison]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 14:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[UK's government debt burden may reach 100% of GDP]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/21/uks-government-debt-burden-may-reach-100-or-gdp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/21/uks-government-debt-burden-may-reach-100-or-gdp/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/21/uks-government-debt-burden-may-reach-100-or-gdp/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/westminster_public_domain_photo.jpg" />Can you imagine this! The outlook in the UK has been <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e46f01c4-45e3-11de-803f-00144feabdc0.html">downgraded by Standard &amp; Poor's to negative from stable</a>. To underscore the dire economic circumstances in the UK, Standard &amp; Poor's David Beers said: "We have revised the outlook on the UK to negative due to our view that even assuming additional fiscal tightening, the net general government debt burden could approach 100% of GDP and remain near that level in the medium term." Yet the Agency did maintain the UK's long term sovereign credit rating at AAA.</p>
<p>The report triggered a drop of 1.2% in the pound to $1.5529 to the dollar and 1.4% against the euro to .8866 pounds.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/21/uks-government-debt-burden-may-reach-100-or-gdp/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>UK's government debt burden may reach 100% of GDP</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/21/uks-government-debt-burden-may-reach-100-or-gdp/">UK's government debt burden may reach 100% of GDP</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 21 May 2009 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e46f01c4-45e3-11de-803f-00144feabdc0.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/21/uks-government-debt-burden-may-reach-100-or-gdp/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1552922/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/21/uks-government-debt-burden-may-reach-100-or-gdp/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>S P</category><category>S P downgrade</category><category>SP</category><category>SPDowngrade</category><category>UK outlook</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Quick Take: Why is the market down today?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/quick-take-why-is-the-market-down-today/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/quick-take-why-is-the-market-down-today/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/quick-take-why-is-the-market-down-today/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nasdaq/" rel="tag">NASDAQ</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/05/wallstreets.jpg" />The market is down again today and there are millions of people trying to figure out why. Some will tell you they know why and give you a plausible rationale. There may be bits of truth here and there but there is also an arbitrary nature too. If not arbitrary, then haphazard.<br /><br />The market may be down because nobody in Washington - Obama, Benanke or Geitner - made a speech today pounding the drum for a brighter economic outlook.<br /><br />It could be because oil prices have been slowly rising again as inventories are drawn down.<em><span class="symbol"><em></em></span><em></em></em><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/quick-take-why-is-the-market-down-today/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Quick Take: Why is the market down today?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/quick-take-why-is-the-market-down-today/">Quick Take: Why is the market down today?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 13 May 2009 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/quick-take-why-is-the-market-down-today/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1545261/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/quick-take-why-is-the-market-down-today/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DJIA</category><category>FDX</category><category>featured</category><category>NASDAQ</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>SP</category><category>Stock Market</category><category>StockMarket</category><category>UPS</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oil hits high for the year, as S&amp;P goes positive]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/oil-hits-high-for-the-year-as-sandp-goes-positive/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/oil-hits-high-for-the-year-as-sandp-goes-positive/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/oil-hits-high-for-the-year-as-sandp-goes-positive/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/middle-east/" rel="tag">Middle East</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/oil.jpg" alt="oil prices hit 2009 high" />Oil prices have been steadily heading higher the past month, and today was no exception, as the precious crude managed to close today's trading at its <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20090504-710907.html">highest value in 2009</a>.<br /><br />While we are still no where near the record high prices we were seeing last summer, oil has managed to slowly creep its way up to $54.58 a barrel. This was after a rise on the day of $1.73, and it is a clear sign that analysts believe that global demand is about to move in oil's favor.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/oil-hits-high-for-the-year-as-sandp-goes-positive/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oil hits high for the year, as S&amp;P goes positive</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/oil-hits-high-for-the-year-as-sandp-goes-positive/">Oil hits high for the year, as S&amp;P goes positive</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 04 May 2009 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/oil-hits-high-for-the-year-as-sandp-goes-positive/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1536197/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/oil-hits-high-for-the-year-as-sandp-goes-positive/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>autos</category><category>construction</category><category>gasoline</category><category>oil</category><category>oil demand</category><category>oil prices</category><category>OilDemand</category><category>OilPrices</category><category>SP</category><category>travel</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Quick: the next 700 points on the S&amp;P 500, up or down? ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/quick-the-next-700-points-on-the-sandp-500-up-or-down/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/quick-the-next-700-points-on-the-sandp-500-up-or-down/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/quick-the-next-700-points-on-the-sandp-500-up-or-down/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/money-losers-2-american-investor-200cm121808.jpg" alt="" /><em>This post was written by <a href="http://www.minyanville.com">Minyanville</a> Executive Editor Keving Depew.</em><br /><br />Quick: the next 700 points on the S&amp;P 500; up or down?<br /><br /> I remember when that question required some thought, around 1200 or so. Regardless, it is interesting to me as someone who also manages some longer-term investment accounts (with time frames exceeding 10 years) that people seem to be more concerned with the direction of the next 100 points than the next 700.<br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/quick-the-next-700-points-on-the-sandp-500-up-or-down/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Quick: the next 700 points on the S&amp;P 500, up or down? </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/quick-the-next-700-points-on-the-sandp-500-up-or-down/">Quick: the next 700 points on the S&amp;P 500, up or down? </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 02 Mar 2009 16:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.minyanville.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/quick-the-next-700-points-on-the-sandp-500-up-or-down/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1476022/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/quick-the-next-700-points-on-the-sandp-500-up-or-down/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economy</category><category>index</category><category>market</category><category>sp</category><category>sp500</category><category>spx</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Harrison]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 16:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Record drop in home prices]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/record-drop-in-home-prices/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/record-drop-in-home-prices/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/record-drop-in-home-prices/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/realestate.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Home prices continued their downward spiral in the fourth quarter, <a href="http://www.walletpop.com/mortgages/article/_a/bbdp/home-prices-post-record-annual-decline/319331">posting a record drop in values</a>. <br /><br />One of the most widely watched indexes for home values is the Standard &amp; Poor's/Case-Shiller U.S. National Home Price Index and, according to data released today, the index dropped by an amazing 18.2% during the fourth quarter when compared with the same period in 2007. This marks the largest quarterly drop in the 21 years that the index has been tracking home prices.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/record-drop-in-home-prices/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Record drop in home prices</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/record-drop-in-home-prices/">Record drop in home prices</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/record-drop-in-home-prices/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1469955/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/record-drop-in-home-prices/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Case-Shiller</category><category>consumer confidence</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>ConsumerConfidence</category><category>ConsumerSpending</category><category>foreclosures</category><category>home values</category><category>homes</category><category>HomeValues</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Obama</category><category>price index</category><category>PriceIndex</category><category>SP</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Diamond Offshore Drilling (DO) to be added to S&amp;P 500]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/diamond-offshore-drilling-do-to-be-added-to-sandp-500/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/diamond-offshore-drilling-do-to-be-added-to-sandp-500/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/diamond-offshore-drilling-do-to-be-added-to-sandp-500/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a></p><a href="http://www.diamondoffshore.com/investors/investors_overview.php" target="_blank"><img id="img1" alt="DO logo" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/do-diamond-offshore-drilling-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/diamond-offshore-drilling-inc/do/nys">Diamond Offshore Drilling</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/diamond-offshore-drilling-inc/do/nys">DO</a> - <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/diamond-offshore-drilling-inc/do/nys/option-chains">option chain</a>) shares have been just about flat today after Standard &amp; Poor's (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcgraw-hill-companies-incorporat/mhp/nys">MHP</a>) announced that <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/standard-and-poors-announces-changes-to/rfid185215862">the company will be added to the S&amp;P 500 Index</a> on a date still to be determined, replacing <a href="http:// http://finance.aol.com/quotes/weatherford-international-ltd/wft/nys">Weatherford International Ltd.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http:// http://finance.aol.com/quotes/weatherford-international-ltd/wft/nys">WFT</a>). This usually causes a surge in stock value as all the ETFs that track the S&amp;P 500 now have to rush to add DO positions. <br /><br />While DO is not rising today, it is also not falling sharply like the rest of the market, especially when compared to its peers like <a href="http:// http://finance.aol.com/quotes/transocean-ltd/rig/nys">Transocean</a> (NYSE: <a href="http:// http://finance.aol.com/quotes/transocean-ltd/rig/nys">RIG</a>), which just reported <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsnews/idAFN1732987620090217?rpc=33" target="_blank">slowing earnings</a> today and is down by more than 5%. If you think that DO won't fall by too much in the coming months, then now could be a good time to look at a bullish hedged trade on that stock.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/diamond-offshore-drilling-do-to-be-added-to-sandp-500/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Diamond Offshore Drilling (DO) to be added to S&amp;P 500</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/diamond-offshore-drilling-do-to-be-added-to-sandp-500/">Diamond Offshore Drilling (DO) to be added to S&amp;P 500</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/diamond-offshore-drilling-do-to-be-added-to-sandp-500/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1463039/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/diamond-offshore-drilling-do-to-be-added-to-sandp-500/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DO</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>InvestorsObserver</category><category>options</category><category>RIG</category><category>SP</category><category>Standard Poors</category><category>StandardPoors</category><category>Transocean Inc</category><category>TransoceanInc</category><category>Weatherford International</category><category>WeatherfordInternational</category><category>WFT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[S&amp;P rated deal 'structured by cows' according to SEC report]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/02/sandp-rated-deal-structured-by-cows-according-to-sec-report/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/02/sandp-rated-deal-structured-by-cows-according-to-sec-report/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/02/sandp-rated-deal-structured-by-cows-according-to-sec-report/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mhp/" rel="tag">McGraw-Hill Companies (MHP)</a></p><p><img height="96" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/sp_logo.jpg" width="220" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" /><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121764476728206967.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing"><em>The Wall Street Journal</em></a> (subscription required) has obtained a draft version of the SEC's report on bond-rating firms and their role in the credit bubble, and some of the stuff is pretty scary.</p>
<p>In one e-mail, a staffer at Standard &amp; Poor's, which is own by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcgraw-hill-companies-incorporat/mhp/nys">McGraw-Hill</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcgraw-hill-companies-incorporat/mhp/nys">MHP</a>) told another that "we rate every deal," and that "it could be structured by cows and we would rate it."</p>
<p>Another wrote that "rating agencies continue to create" an "even bigger monster -- the CDO market. Let's hope we are all wealthy and retired by the time this house of cards falters. ;O)"</p>
<p>Yes -- complete with the smiley face. If this seems reminiscent of disgraced analyst Henry Blodget's e-mails bashing stocks he was publicly pumping during the dot-com bubble, that's because it's exactly the same. The lesson here, once again, is this: e-mails ever really get deleted permanently and, if you're being shady or doing something unethical, make a phone call, talk with the person in a dark alley, or send them a letter that they can promptly discard. Don't send an e-mail!</p>
<p>Of course, S&amp;P's investment-grade ratings on CDOs stuffed with dodgy loans turned out to be wildly optimistic, and the house of cards has done more than falter -- it's brought down Bear Stearns and wreaked havoc on the economy.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/02/sandp-rated-deal-structured-by-cows-according-to-sec-report/">S&amp;P rated deal 'structured by cows' according to SEC report</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 02 Aug 2008 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/02/sandp-rated-deal-structured-by-cows-according-to-sec-report/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1273560/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/02/sandp-rated-deal-structured-by-cows-according-to-sec-report/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bear Stearns</category><category>bond rating</category><category>BSC</category><category>CDOs</category><category>e-mail</category><category>Henry Blodget</category><category>inthenews</category><category>McGraw-Hill</category><category>MHP</category><category>ratings agencies</category><category>SEC</category><category>SP</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[A solution to the credit rating mortgage securities scandal]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/02/a-solution-to-the-credit-rating-mortgage-securities-scandal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/02/a-solution-to-the-credit-rating-mortgage-securities-scandal/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/02/a-solution-to-the-credit-rating-mortgage-securities-scandal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><p>Now that the SEC has had some time to sift though all the evidence of why credit rating agencies were so wrong in their view of mortgage-backed securities, the most disturbing finding is that S&amp;P analysts thought their own conclusions about risk were often wrong.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121764476728206967.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news">According to <em>The Wall Street Journal</em></a> (subscription required), an S&amp;P analytical staffer emailed another that a mortgage or structured-finance deal was "ridiculous" and that "we should not be rating it."</p>
<p>What should the government do now that it has the goods? It could fine S&amp;P, and probably will. The fine could never be large enough to match the hundreds of billions of dollars lost by financial firms that put money into the securities. The SEC could bring charges against some of the analysts. As it is, some of them will probably lose their jobs.</p>
<p>The most sensible solution would be to bar S&amp;P from rating derivatives at all. Would that leave a hole in the market? Probably. Other credit agencies might have been involved in similar misdeeds. That would mean they would have to exit the business as well.</p>
<p>The net effect of moving credit ratings out of the business of covering derivatives would almost certainly mean a huge drop-off in the market for the instruments. That might not be such a bad thing.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/02/a-solution-to-the-credit-rating-mortgage-securities-scandal/">A solution to the credit rating mortgage securities scandal</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 02 Aug 2008 08:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/02/a-solution-to-the-credit-rating-mortgage-securities-scandal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1273576/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/02/a-solution-to-the-credit-rating-mortgage-securities-scandal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>credit ratings</category><category>derivatives</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mortgage-backed securities</category><category>S and P</category><category>SEC</category><category>SP</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 08:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[SEC: Ratings agencies cheated, a little]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/09/sec-ratings-agencies-cheated-a-little/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/09/sec-ratings-agencies-cheated-a-little/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/09/sec-ratings-agencies-cheated-a-little/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a></p><p>Analysts at some of the large credit ratings agencies may have had their eyes on the cash register instead of paying attention to the quality of their work. So says the SEC. </p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121553798772436283.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing">According to</a> <em>The Wall Street Journal, "</em>The 10-month examination uncovered poor disclosure practices, a lack of policies and procedures guiding the analysis of mortgage-related debt, and insufficient attention paid to managing conflicts of interests."</p>
<p>That revelation all but buries the already damaged reputations of the ratings firms. </p>
<p>Making money is OK, but the practices may have lost investors billions of dollars. The big credit rating shops like Standard &amp; Poor's have the job of evaluating the risk of products like mortgage-backed securities. Investment banks and their clients thought this paper was fairly safe. It did not turn out that way, not by a long shot.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/09/sec-ratings-agencies-cheated-a-little/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>SEC: Ratings agencies cheated, a little</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/09/sec-ratings-agencies-cheated-a-little/">SEC: Ratings agencies cheated, a little</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 09 Jul 2008 13:36:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121553798772436283.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/09/sec-ratings-agencies-cheated-a-little/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1249854/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/09/sec-ratings-agencies-cheated-a-little/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>ratings agencies</category><category>RatingsAgencies</category><category>SEC</category><category>SP</category><category>Standard Poors</category><category>StandardPoors</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 13:36:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AK Steel (AKS) added to the S&amp;P 500]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/27/ak-steel-aks-added-to-the-sandp-500/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/27/ak-steel-aks-added-to-the-sandp-500/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/27/ak-steel-aks-added-to-the-sandp-500/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.aksteel.com/investor_information/default.asp"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="AKS logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/aks-ak-steel-logo.jpg" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ak-steel-holding-corporation/aks/nys">AK Steel</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ak-steel-holding-corporation/aks/nys">AKS</a>) shares are trading higher today after <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/ap/_a/out-of-the-gate-ak-steel-up-added-to/rfid116776996">Standard &amp; Poor's announced they have added the stock to the S&amp;P 500 index</a>. These announcements drive stock prices higher since any mutual fund that is tracking the S&amp;P 500 will need to add AKS to its holdings soon. If you think that the stock won't fall by too much in the coming months, then now could be a good time to look at a bullish hedged trade on AKS.<br /><br />After hitting a one-year low of $27.90 in August, the stock hit a one-year high of $73.07 in May. AKS opened this morning at $65.74. So far today the stock has hit a low of $65.42 and a high of $68.10. As of 12:30, AKS is trading at $67.18, up $4.00 (6.3%). The chart for AKS looks neutral and deteriorating, while <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline">S&amp;P</a> gives the stock a bearish 2 Stars (out of 5) Sell rating.<br /><br />For a bullish hedged play on this stock, I would consider a July <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/HSCS">bull-put credit spread</a> below the $55 range. A bull-put credit spread is an options position that combines the purchase and sale of put options to hedge risk in case the stock doesn't do what you think but still leverage nice returns. For this particular trade, we will make a 7.5% return in just three weeks as long as AKS is above $55 at July expiration. AKS would have to fall by more than 18% before we would start to lose money. Learn more about this type of trade <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/HSCS">here</a>.<br /><br />AKS has not been below $55 since April and has shown support around $63 recently. This trade could be risky if the global economy tanks in the next few weeks, but even if that happens, this position could be protected by the support the stock might find around $63, where it has bounced twice in the past month.<br /><em><br />Brent Archer is an options analyst and writer at <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/aolblogba">Investors Observer</a>. <br /><br />DISCLOSURE: Mr. Archer owns and/or controls diversified portfolios of long and short stock and option positions that may include holdings in companies he writes about. At publication time, Brent neither owns nor controls positions in AKS.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/27/ak-steel-aks-added-to-the-sandp-500/">AK Steel (AKS) added to the S&amp;P 500</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:16:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/27/ak-steel-aks-added-to-the-sandp-500/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1238882/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/27/ak-steel-aks-added-to-the-sandp-500/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AK Steel</category><category>AKS</category><category>AkSteel</category><category>inthenews</category><category>options</category><category>SP</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:16:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[SEC requested to ramp up ratings regulation]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/16/sec-requested-to-ramp-up-ratings-regulation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/16/sec-requested-to-ramp-up-ratings-regulation/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/16/sec-requested-to-ramp-up-ratings-regulation/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mhp/" rel="tag">McGraw-Hill Companies (MHP)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/seclogo.jpg"  alt="" />Given that the big credit rating agencies -- <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/moody-s-corporation/mco/nys">Moody's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/moody-s-corporation/mco/nys">MCO</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcgraw-hill-companies-incorporat/mhp/nys">McGraw-Hill's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcgraw-hill-companies-incorporat/mhp/nys">MHP</a>) Standard &amp; Poors -- completely failed in their assessment of risk when it came to mortgage-backed securities, it's no surprise that the SEC is being asked to take a look.<br /><br />Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY) has met with SEC Chairman Chris Cox to discuss conflicts of interest and disclosure problems. <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120831560779418691.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing&amp;apl=y&amp;r=948416">quotes</a> (subscription required) the senator as saying that "There has to be a lot more done about conflicts of interest at the agencies."<br /><br />Among the worst of the rating agency abusers has been <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/m-b-i-a-inc/mbi/nys">MBIA </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/m-b-i-a-inc/mbi/nys">MBI</a>) which, back in March, had the gall to ask Fitch to drop its coverage of the firm because they didn't like Fitch's opinion. To its credit, Fitch stayed strong and later downgraded the company's credit rating.<br /><br />But wait, there's more: In a devastating piece on Friday, <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120787287341306591.html">reported</a> (subscription required) on Moody's efforts to cozy up to issuers in exchange for more business, possibly at the expense of the integrity of their ratings.<br /><br />This is essentially a replay of the issues involving conflicted analysts like Henry Blodget who, at the height of the internet stock bubble, sacrificed his research to the investment banking arm of his firm. It will take a tough regulator to clean up this mess, and I seriously doubt that Chris Cox is the man for job.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/16/sec-requested-to-ramp-up-ratings-regulation/">SEC requested to ramp up ratings regulation</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120831560779418691.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/16/sec-requested-to-ramp-up-ratings-regulation/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1169052/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/16/sec-requested-to-ramp-up-ratings-regulation/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>MCO</category><category>Moodys</category><category>ratings agencies</category><category>RatingsAgencies</category><category>sandp</category><category>SEC</category><category>sp</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:50:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
