<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Apple's Ping Gets Off to a Rocky Start]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/05/apple-ping-spam/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/05/apple-ping-spam/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/05/apple-ping-spam/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="Ping logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/09/ping-logo.jpg" />Apple's (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas" class="inlinked">AAPL</a>) new iTunes-based social networking service, Ping, has gotten off to a somewhat rocky start. The service allows iTunes users to see what others like and to recommend music.</p>
<p>But within 24 hours of Ping's launch it was inundated with <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/204858/is_apples_ping_a_haven_for_spammers.html?tk=hp_new">comment spam</a>. While Apple filters Ping for other offensive material, it apparently forgot about such spam, an obvious oversight.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/05/apple-ping-spam/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Apple's Ping Gets Off to a Rocky Start</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/05/apple-ping-spam/">Apple's Ping Gets Off to a Rocky Start</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 05 Sep 2010 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/05/apple-ping-spam/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19621737/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/05/apple-ping-spam/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple</category><category>Facebook</category><category>inthenews</category><category>iTunes</category><category>Ping</category><category>spam</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Spam Still Going Strong: Hormel Hikes Earnings Forecast]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/spam-still-going-strong-hormel-hikes-earnings-forecast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/spam-still-going-strong-hormel-hikes-earnings-forecast/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/spam-still-going-strong-hormel-hikes-earnings-forecast/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hrl/" rel="tag">Hormel Foods (HRL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/11/spam_everettt.com.jpg"  alt="" />Hormel Foods (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/hormel-foods-corporation/hrl/nys">HRL</a>) surged past analysts' fiscal first-quarter earnings estimates, with the sultan of Spam swinging to a profit of <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/rtn/pr/hormel-foods-reports-first-quarter-results/rfid300769185/?channel=pf">$111.2 million</a>, or 82 cents per share, up 37% from the year-ago period. Sales for the quarter climbed 2.3% to $1.73 billion. Both numbers easily exceeded Wall Street's consensus expectations, which called for a profit of just 68 cents per share on $1.67 billion in revenue.</p>
<p>Hormel added to the positive momentum by boosting its earnings forecast for the rest of fiscal 2010. The packaged-foods firm now expects to bank a profit of $2.68 to $2.78 per share, up from its prior forecast of $2.63 to $2.73 per share.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/spam-still-going-strong-hormel-hikes-earnings-forecast/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Spam Still Going Strong: Hormel Hikes Earnings Forecast</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/spam-still-going-strong-hormel-hikes-earnings-forecast/">Spam Still Going Strong: Hormel Hikes Earnings Forecast</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/spam-still-going-strong-hormel-hikes-earnings-forecast/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19363423/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/spam-still-going-strong-hormel-hikes-earnings-forecast/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>52-week high</category><category>earnings</category><category>first quarter</category><category>guidance</category><category>Hormel Foods</category><category>HRL</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Spam</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Facebook picks up $711 million; Spam King faces jail time]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/facebook-picks-up-711-million-spam-king-faces-jail-time/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/facebook-picks-up-711-million-spam-king-faces-jail-time/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/facebook-picks-up-711-million-spam-king-faces-jail-time/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/facebook.jpg" />Who needs <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/venturecapital/">venture capital</a> money when you have litigation? Facebook was awarded $711 million in damages Thursday in an anti-spam case against Sanford Wallace, an internet marketer. The popular social networking platform went after Wallace for <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33549173/ns/business-us_business/" target="_blank">tapping its users' accounts without their permission</a> and sending fake posts and messages.</p>
<p>Wallace has quite a reputation for spamming, having gained the nicknames "Spam King" and "Spamford" back in the 1990s, when he was good for up to 30 million spam e-mails a day.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/facebook-picks-up-711-million-spam-king-faces-jail-time/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Facebook picks up $711 million; Spam King faces jail time</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/facebook-picks-up-711-million-spam-king-faces-jail-time/">Facebook picks up $711 million; Spam King faces jail time</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 01 Nov 2009 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/facebook-picks-up-711-million-spam-king-faces-jail-time/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19217828/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/facebook-picks-up-711-million-spam-king-faces-jail-time/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>antispam</category><category>can-spam</category><category>facebook</category><category>federal trade commission</category><category>ftc</category><category>inthenews</category><category>malware</category><category>myspace</category><category>myspace.com</category><category>sanford wallace</category><category>social media</category><category>social networking</category><category>spam</category><category>spammers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sunday Funnies: Motley Fools seem desperate]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/sunday-funnies-motley-fools-seem-desperate/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/sunday-funnies-motley-fools-seem-desperate/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/sunday-funnies-motley-fools-seem-desperate/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sunday-funnies/" rel="tag">Sunday Funnies</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/dunce_cap-small.jpg" width="160" height="201" />How desperate can they get? First I received a very long-winded, 10+ page e-mail from Motley Fool with the following sales pitch :<em>That's why I'm offering you the chance to join <em>Motley Fool Stock Advisor</em> for just $79 -- that's 60% OFF<span style="COLOR: rgb(255,0,0)"><strong></strong></span> our regular membership rate. But a word of warning: This special discount will be available for a limited time only!</em></p>
<p>Two days later, I received another <em>10+ page, jargon-filled</em> e-mail blabbering on about the virtues of the newsletter while trying to create a sense of urgency because the clock was ticking and I was going to miss out.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/sunday-funnies-motley-fools-seem-desperate/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Sunday Funnies: Motley Fools seem desperate</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/sunday-funnies-motley-fools-seem-desperate/">Sunday Funnies: Motley Fools seem desperate</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 01 Nov 2009 11:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/sunday-funnies-motley-fools-seem-desperate/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19218008/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/01/sunday-funnies-motley-fools-seem-desperate/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Investment advice</category><category>investment newsletters</category><category>money</category><category>money management</category><category>MoneyManagement</category><category>Motley Fool</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>spam</category><category>Sunday Funnies</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 11:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hormel Foods hikes fiscal year outlook after a strong Q3]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/10/hormel-foods-hikes-fiscal-year-outlook-after-a-strong-q3/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/10/hormel-foods-hikes-fiscal-year-outlook-after-a-strong-q3/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/10/hormel-foods-hikes-fiscal-year-outlook-after-a-strong-q3/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hrl/" rel="tag">Hormel Foods (HRL)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/spam01at240.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hormel-foods-corporation/hrl/nys">Hormel Foods Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hormel-foods-corporation/hrl/nys">HRL</a>) pleased Wall Street this morning with an <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2009/08/10/financial/f045442D05.DTL&amp;feed=rss.business">upwardly revised 2009 forecast</a>. Thanks to a strong third-quarter performance from its Jennie-O turkey unit, along with solid results in its refrigerated foods and grocery products divisions, Hormel now expects fiscal 2009 earnings of $2.36 to $2.42 per share. </p>
<p>"We also benefited from better investment performance in our rabbi trust," commented Chairman, President, and CEO Jeffrey M. Ettinger in a company release.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/10/hormel-foods-hikes-fiscal-year-outlook-after-a-strong-q3/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Hormel Foods hikes fiscal year outlook after a strong Q3</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/10/hormel-foods-hikes-fiscal-year-outlook-after-a-strong-q3/">Hormel Foods hikes fiscal year outlook after a strong Q3</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/10/hormel-foods-hikes-fiscal-year-outlook-after-a-strong-q3/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19124306/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/10/hormel-foods-hikes-fiscal-year-outlook-after-a-strong-q3/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>fiscal 2009</category><category>fiscal year outlook</category><category>Fiscal2009</category><category>FiscalYearOutlook</category><category>guidance</category><category>Hormel Foods</category><category>HormelFoods</category><category>HRL</category><category>Jennie-o</category><category>short sellers</category><category>ShortSellers</category><category>Spam</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>TechnicalAnalysis</category><category>third quarter earnings</category><category>ThirdQuarterEarnings</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hormel's second quarter: A passing grade]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/hormels-second-quarter-a-passing-grade/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/hormels-second-quarter-a-passing-grade/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/hormels-second-quarter-a-passing-grade/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cag/" rel="tag">ConAgra Foods (CAG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hrl/" rel="tag">Hormel Foods (HRL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/kft/" rel="tag">Kraft Foods'A' (KFT)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hormel-foods-corporation/hrl/nys"><img  hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/05/hormel_tag.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />Hormel Foods</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hormel-foods-corporation/hrl/nys">HRL</a>) hasn't been a bad stock. Its recent performance is firmly in the green. Shares of Hormel have increased in value by 8% year-to-date. Over the last six months, the stock is up by roughly 16%. </p>
<p>Now we come to the food entity's second-quarter report, which <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/hormel-foods-reports-second-quarter/rfid215724941">was issued</a> on Thursday. Do the numbers indicate that the stock will continue to trend higher? Or is now the time to sell?</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/hormels-second-quarter-a-passing-grade/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Hormel's second quarter: A passing grade</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/hormels-second-quarter-a-passing-grade/">Hormel's second quarter: A passing grade</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 22 May 2009 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/hormel-foods-reports-second-quarter/rfid215724941>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124290547225642983.html?mod=googlenews_wsj>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/hormels-second-quarter-a-passing-grade/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1553460/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/hormels-second-quarter-a-passing-grade/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CAG</category><category>ConAgra</category><category>dividend</category><category>dividend investing</category><category>dividend stocks</category><category>DividendInvesting</category><category>DividendStocks</category><category>featured</category><category>food</category><category>Hormel</category><category>HRL</category><category>KFT</category><category>Kraft</category><category>spam</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Standard &amp; Poor's invites Spam to join S&amp;P 500 Index]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/standard-and-poors-invites-spam-to-join-sandp-500-index/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/standard-and-poors-invites-spam-to-join-sandp-500-index/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/standard-and-poors-invites-spam-to-join-sandp-500-index/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hrl/" rel="tag">Hormel Foods (HRL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/spam01at240.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />Just last week, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hormel-foods-corporation/hrl/nys">Hormel Foods Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hormel-foods-corporation/hrl/nys">HRL</a>) surprised investors with <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/sales-rise-at-hormel-boosted-by-strength-in-spam/">stronger-than-expected first-quarter earnings</a>. Sales during the period were boosted by healthy demand for the company's recession-friendly canned ham-like product, Spam. Today, it seems that Standard &amp; Poor's is revealing its own soft spot for potted meat, announcing that <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/standard-and-poor-s-announces-changes-to-u-s-indices/rfid188481548?channel=pf">HRL will join its storied S&amp;P 500 Index</a> as of the close of trading on March 3.</p>
<p>Hormel will replace <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-capital-ltd/acas/nas">American Capital Ltd.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-capital-ltd/acas/nas">ACAS</a>) in the closely watched broad-market index. The latter stock has given up nearly 96% of its value during the past year, and it's extending those losses today with a plunge of more than 16%.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/standard-and-poors-invites-spam-to-join-sandp-500-index/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Standard &amp; Poor's invites Spam to join S&amp;P 500 Index</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/standard-and-poors-invites-spam-to-join-sandp-500-index/">Standard &amp; Poor's invites Spam to join S&amp;P 500 Index</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/standard-and-poors-invites-spam-to-join-sandp-500-index/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1471196/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/standard-and-poors-invites-spam-to-join-sandp-500-index/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ACAS</category><category>American Capital Ltd.</category><category>AmericanCapitalLtd.</category><category>hormel foods</category><category>HormelFoods</category><category>HRL</category><category>inthenews</category><category>investor sentiment</category><category>InvestorSentiment</category><category>options</category><category>SP 500 Index</category><category>Sp500Index</category><category>Spam</category><category>SPX</category><category>Standard Poors</category><category>StandardPoors</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>TechnicalAnalysis</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sales rise at Hormel, boosted by strength in Spam]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/sales-rise-at-hormel-boosted-by-strength-in-spam/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/sales-rise-at-hormel-boosted-by-strength-in-spam/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/sales-rise-at-hormel-boosted-by-strength-in-spam/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hrl/" rel="tag">Hormel Foods (HRL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/spam01at240.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />Shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hormel-foods-corporation/hrl/nys">Hormel Foods Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hormel-foods-corporation/hrl/nys">HRL</a>) are on the upswing today, after the packaged-foods firm exceeded analysts' first-quarter earnings expectations. The company's upside surprise is partially attributable to strong sales of its infamous canned meat, Spam, which successfully lured in cost-conscious consumers.</p>
<p>During the recently concluded quarter, HRL <a href="http://www.reuters.com/legacyArticle?duid=mtfh22246_2009-02-19_13-26-26_n19446250_newsml&amp;rpc=33&amp;type=marketsnews">banked a profit </a>of $81.4 million, or 60 cents per share. That's an 8% slide from the same quarter last year, but analysts were expecting a profit of just 51 cents per share. Net sales rose 4% to $1.69 billion, with strong results for Dinty Moore stews, Hormel chili, and the aforementioned Spam.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/sales-rise-at-hormel-boosted-by-strength-in-spam/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Sales rise at Hormel, boosted by strength in Spam</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/sales-rise-at-hormel-boosted-by-strength-in-spam/">Sales rise at Hormel, boosted by strength in Spam</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/sales-rise-at-hormel-boosted-by-strength-in-spam/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1465423/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/sales-rise-at-hormel-boosted-by-strength-in-spam/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2009 forecast</category><category>2009Forecast</category><category>first-quarter earnings</category><category>First-quarterEarnings</category><category>hormel foods</category><category>HormelFoods</category><category>HRL</category><category>investor sentiment</category><category>InvestorSentiment</category><category>recession</category><category>spam</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>TechnicalAnalysis</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Riding the 'four food groups of the apocalypse']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/riding-the-four-food-groups-of-the-apocalypse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/riding-the-four-food-groups-of-the-apocalypse/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/riding-the-four-food-groups-of-the-apocalypse/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cpb/" rel="tag">Campbell Soup (CPB)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hsy/" rel="tag">Hershey Co (HSY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hrl/" rel="tag">Hormel Foods (HRL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/food-groups.gif" alt="" />We don't expect to find investment advice from opinion columns, but <em>New York Times</em> columnist Frank Rich unleashed a quartet to those willing to read between the lines in his recent piece <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/01/opinion/01rich.html?partner=permalink&amp;exprod=permalink">"Herbert Hoover Lives."</a></p>
<p>Here's the money quote (no pun intended) from the theater critic turned political pundit: "What are Americans still buying? Big Macs, Campbell's soup, Hershey's chocolate and Spam -- the four food groups of the apocalypse."</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/riding-the-four-food-groups-of-the-apocalypse/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Riding the 'four food groups of the apocalypse'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/riding-the-four-food-groups-of-the-apocalypse/">Riding the 'four food groups of the apocalypse'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/riding-the-four-food-groups-of-the-apocalypse/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1457751/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/riding-the-four-food-groups-of-the-apocalypse/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>comfort food</category><category>ComfortFood</category><category>CPB</category><category>featured</category><category>food stocks</category><category>FoodStocks</category><category>four food groups of the apocalypse</category><category>FourFoodGroupsOfTheApocalypse</category><category>Frank Rich</category><category>FrankRich</category><category>HRL</category><category>HSY</category><category>jim woods</category><category>JimWoods</category><category>MCD</category><category>recession plays</category><category>recession stocks</category><category>RecessionPlays</category><category>RecessionStocks</category><category>spam</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Woods]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Big company, small town: Hormel Foods, Austin, Minnesota]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/27/big-company-small-town-hormel-foods-austin-minnesota/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/27/big-company-small-town-hormel-foods-austin-minnesota/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/27/big-company-small-town-hormel-foods-austin-minnesota/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hrl/" rel="tag">Hormel Foods (HRL)</a></p><p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/small-big-hormel-foods-austin-minnesota-200cs061808.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />This post is part of our <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/small-towns-big-companies">Big Company, Small Town</a></strong> series, featuring large companies and the small towns in which they are headquartered.</em></p>
<p>Ah, Spam. Doesn't the word make your mouth water? Or maybe not. Either way, Spam must be given its due. It is the most famous of the mystery meats, those exciting concoctions of the meat-packing industry. It has been sold by the billions of cans since its invention in 1937. It helped feed the Allies and win World War Two. It is central to a Monty Python skit about Vikings in a greasy spoon, and now a Broadway musical. It provides a name for unwanted e-mail. It theoretically lasts forever. And it is a product of the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hormel-foods-corporation/hrl/nys">Hormel Foods Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hormel-foods-corporation/hrl/nys">HRL</a>).</p>
<p>Spam is made in several places, but its ancestral home and main production facility is in Austin, Minnesota, sometimes called Spam Town. Austin is the small town south of Minneapolis that is home to Hormel, proud maker of all things Spam. (I should note that Hormel would prefer that we write "SPAM luncheon meat" but I don't think we'll take that suggestion too seriously.)</p>
<p>Hormel has long dominated the town of Austin, and not just because the <a href="http://www.spam.com/museum/">Spam Museum</a> is located there. It is by far the largest employer in town and the majority of workers in Austin work for Hormel, producing many of the company's meaty foods. Hormel's roots in the town go deep. Drawn by the town's good rail and river access, George A. Hormel opened a meat packing business there in 1891, and his small company eventually grew into the billion-dollar colossus that today owns a dizzying array of food brands, from Chi-Chi's and Valley Fresh to Dinty Moore and, of course, Spam. (Does it seem fair that one company gets to own both Dinty Moore <em>and</em> Spam?)</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/27/big-company-small-town-hormel-foods-austin-minnesota/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Big company, small town: Hormel Foods, Austin, Minnesota</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/27/big-company-small-town-hormel-foods-austin-minnesota/">Big company, small town: Hormel Foods, Austin, Minnesota</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/27/big-company-small-town-hormel-foods-austin-minnesota/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1229480/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/27/big-company-small-town-hormel-foods-austin-minnesota/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Austin</category><category>DintyMoore</category><category>George Hormel</category><category>Hormel</category><category>Hormel Foods</category><category>Hormel strike</category><category>HRL</category><category>Minnesota</category><category>small town</category><category>spam</category><category>Spam Museum</category><category>Spam Town</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Rainey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[SPAM: Good food and good company]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/08/spam-good-food-and-good-company/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/08/spam-good-food-and-good-company/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/08/spam-good-food-and-good-company/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hrl/" rel="tag">Hormel Foods (HRL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img height="211" alt="SPAM" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/spam01at240.jpg" width="220" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />In tough financial times, certain food products and food preparation ideas seem to gain increasing favor with consumers. People try to find ways to prepare nutritious and interesting meals while gaining greater purchasing power from their hard-earned dollars.</p>
<p>Just the other day, some of us bloggers were engaged in a lively email chat regarding some of our tried-and-true strategies for stretching our grocery dollars. As you can guess, ramen noodles almost immediately took center stage. I was entertained with stories of the many ways that the slender pasta can be made quite appealing. For instance, if you take any brand of chunky salsa, cut it 50% with water, add a sliced hot dog and pour the heated mixture over the noodles, it's really a very delicious and satisfying meal.</p>
<p>As the discussion ebbed, I couldn't help but be amazed that no one had mentioned SPAM, by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hormel-foods-corporation/hrl/nys">Hormel Foods Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hormel-foods-corporation/hrl/nys">HRL</a>). Surely, I thought, these people must know about <a href="http://www.cusd.claremont.edu/%7Emrosenbl/spamstory.html">the illustrious history of SPAM</a>! Could they ignore the fact that SPAM has carried literally millions of people though hard times since prior to World War II? Though there is probably a ratio of three SPAM jokes to every one SPAM recipe, the fact remains that Hormel's SPAM, in all its variations, still sells exceptionally well. It sells even better as times get tough, as indicated by <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gtF_r6YW589BUegKGbzv4jQP-g_AD90URO003">a recent Associated Press overview</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/08/spam-good-food-and-good-company/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>SPAM: Good food and good company</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/08/spam-good-food-and-good-company/">SPAM: Good food and good company</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 08 Jun 2008 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.spam.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/08/spam-good-food-and-good-company/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1214092/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/08/spam-good-food-and-good-company/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>food</category><category>groceries</category><category>Hormel Foods</category><category>HRL</category><category>inflation-defeating stocks</category><category>shopping</category><category>SPAM</category><category>Twinkie sandwich</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is Spam nutritious for your portfolio?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/28/is-spam-nutritious-for-your-portfolio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/28/is-spam-nutritious-for-your-portfolio/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/28/is-spam-nutritious-for-your-portfolio/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hrl/" rel="tag">Hormel Foods (HRL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/11/spam_everettt.com.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /><a href="http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2008/05/28/sales_of_spam_rise_as_consumers_trim_food_costs/">The Associated Press</a></em> reports that Spam sales are on the rise. Cans of Spam -- a pig byproduct -- are flying off the shelf as consumers are turning more to lunch meats and other lower-cost foods to extend their already stretched food budgets.</p>
<p>As I <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/26/12-ways-to-profit-from-the-middle-class-recession-diet/">posted</a>, consumers are going on a recession diet. I had not thought of Spam as a way to play this trend. But its sales are up 10.6% and its manufacturer, <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hormel-foods-corporation/hrl/nys">Hormel Foods</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hormel-foods-corporation/hrl/nys">HRL</a>) has seen its profits rise 14%. But the price of Spam is up more than Hormel's stock, with the average 12 oz. can costing about $2.62. That's an increase of 17 cents, or nearly 7% from the same time last year. </p>
<p>Despite rising prices, Spam seems like a good alternative to consumers. <em>AP</em> quotes Kimberly Quan, a stay-at-home mom of three, who has been feeding her family more Spam in the last six months as she tries to make her food budget go further. "It's canned meat and it's in the cupboard and if everything else is gone from the fridge, it's there." </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/28/is-spam-nutritious-for-your-portfolio/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is Spam nutritious for your portfolio?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/28/is-spam-nutritious-for-your-portfolio/">Is Spam nutritious for your portfolio?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 28 May 2008 18:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/28/is-spam-nutritious-for-your-portfolio/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1208580/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/28/is-spam-nutritious-for-your-portfolio/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>hormel</category><category>hormel foods</category><category>HormelFoods</category><category>recession</category><category>recession diet</category><category>RecessionDiet</category><category>spam</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 18:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[MySpace wins $230 million anti-spam case - but don't get too excited]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/myspace-wins-230-million-anti-spam-case-but-dont-get-too-exc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/myspace-wins-230-million-anti-spam-case-but-dont-get-too-exc/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/myspace-wins-230-million-anti-spam-case-but-dont-get-too-exc/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/_42419341_pew-myspace203.jpg" alt="" />It's pretty rare that a victory in a $230 million lawsuit is only a moral victory, but Myspace, which is owned by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>), has <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5ieedXWHP7obv4SfKWxyAIwh1m5nwD90L48C80">won just such a case</a>.<br /><br />The company sued Sanford Wallace and Walter Rines for spamming the social networking site's users with phishing schemes and links to websites offering merchandise for sale or paid advertising. A federal judge in Los Angeles ruled in favor of MySpace after the con-men failed to show up for a hearing.<br /><br />Why are the damages so high? CAN-SPAM, a 2003 law, entitled providers to $100 in damages for every spam message sent -- and the amount triples when the spam is sent "willfully and knowingly."<br /><br />Perhaps this will send a message to would-be spammers that they shouldn't mess with MySpace. But the spammers are nowhere to be found, and it's hard to imagine that they have anything like $230 million to pay the judgment, or even the $4.7 million in attorneys fees that the judge awarded MySpace.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/myspace-wins-230-million-anti-spam-case-but-dont-get-too-exc/">MySpace wins $230 million anti-spam case - but don't get too excited</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 14 May 2008 11:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5ieedXWHP7obv4SfKWxyAIwh1m5nwD90L48C80>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/myspace-wins-230-million-anti-spam-case-but-dont-get-too-exc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1195015/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/myspace-wins-230-million-anti-spam-case-but-dont-get-too-exc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>Myspace</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>spam</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 11:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Stock spammer indicted for fraud -- what took so long?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/07/stock-spammer-indicted-for-fraud-what-took-so-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/07/stock-spammer-indicted-for-fraud-what-took-so-long/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/07/stock-spammer-indicted-for-fraud-what-took-so-long/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/notsojustme/615029497/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/pocketwatch.jpg" alt="" /></a>The Justice Department recently made headlines with its indictment of stock spam honcho Alan Ralsky, whom it accused of running a "spamming operation that, as alleged in the indictment, largely focused on running a stock pump and dump scheme, whereby the defendants sent spam touting thinly traded Chinese penny stocks, drove up their stock price, and reaped profits by selling the stock at artificially inflated prices."</p>
<p>Gary Weiss provides <a href="http://garyweiss.blogspot.com/2008/01/spam-king-indicted-but-what-took-them.html">his usual skeptical insight</a>, pointing out that what the "Justice Department doesn't say is that Ralsky was hardly holed up in some cave in Afghanistan. He was operating out in the open, and was even the subject of <a href="http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9806E4DD103EF933A05751C1A9659C8B63">an article in <em>The New York Times</em></a>, for Pete's sake. The <a href="http://www.spamhaus.org/rokso/listing.lasso?spammer=Alan+Ralsky">Spamhaus Project</a> has a file on this man a mile long, and notes that the FBI raided his house three years ago."</p>
<p>The fact that it took the feds so long to do something -- and the fact that the SEC never did anything -- is interesting and indicative of the old saying that "the wheels of justice grind slowly."</p>
<p>Here's the lesson investors should take from this: the fact that no one has been arrested and trading hasn't been suspended doesn't mean that nothing is amiss. Investors cannot rely on the SEC to protect them from fraudulent investments.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/07/stock-spammer-indicted-for-fraud-what-took-so-long/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Stock spammer indicted for fraud -- what took so long?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/07/stock-spammer-indicted-for-fraud-what-took-so-long/">Stock spammer indicted for fraud -- what took so long?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 07 Jan 2008 17:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cnn.com/2008/BUSINESS/01/03/us.spam/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/07/stock-spammer-indicted-for-fraud-what-took-so-long/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1077041/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/07/stock-spammer-indicted-for-fraud-what-took-so-long/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Fraud</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Spam</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 17:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Commtouch: Reverse split a non-event]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/17/commtouch-reverse-split-a-non-event/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/17/commtouch-reverse-split-a-non-event/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/17/commtouch-reverse-split-a-non-event/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/israel/" rel="tag">Israel</a></p><p>The <a href="http://israelnewsletter.com/israeli-stocks-trading-in-the-us/">Israeli</a> company <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/commtouch-software-ltd/ctch/nas">Commtouch</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/commtouch-software-ltd/ctch/nas">CTCH</a>), a leading provider of email defense systems, <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles?id=n20071217050309990007">announced </a>today that all proposals presented to shareholders on its proxy statement for the annual meeting of shareholders held on December 14, 2007 were overwhelmingly approved, including the reverse stock split (by over 92% of the voting shares).</p>
<p>I guess the question is whether this is good, bad, or insignificant news? While in some cases reverse splits signal that a company is at the end of the line, in <a href="http://israelnewsletter.com/2007/10/08/commtouch-strong-demand-for-email-defense/">Commtouch</a>'s case that is not the case. The company continues to execute its business model well, and as more and more defense is needed to stop spammers, <a href="http://israelnewsletter.com/2007/07/09/what-does-googles-purchase-mean-for-commtouch/">Commtouch</a> should continue to grow. The company made this move in order to reduce the number of shares, as well as get the share price up over $5, where it would be open to more institutional interest.</p>
<p>It seems that this is a positive move and the fact that over 90% of the votes were in favor is a good sign. But what's really important is that it continues to sign deals and execute. If it does that, the stock will take care of itself.</p>
<p><em><em>Aaron Katsman is the lead Portfolio Manager and Managing Director of America Israel Investment Associates, LLC. and Senior Editor of </em><a href="http://www.israelnewsletter.com/"><em>IsraelNewsletter.com</em></a><em>. Disclosure: Writer owns stock and is long CTCH. He has no position in any stock mentioned as of 12/13707.</em></em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/17/commtouch-reverse-split-a-non-event/">Commtouch: Reverse split a non-event</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 17 Dec 2007 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles?id=n20071217050309990007>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/17/commtouch-reverse-split-a-non-event/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1064770/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/17/commtouch-reverse-split-a-non-event/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Commtouch</category><category>ctch</category><category>defense</category><category>email</category><category>Israel</category><category>spam</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Katsman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Email defense firm Commtouch wins deal with Check Point]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/10/email-defense-firm-commtouch-wins-deal-with-check-point/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/10/email-defense-firm-commtouch-wins-deal-with-check-point/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/10/email-defense-firm-commtouch-wins-deal-with-check-point/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/israel/" rel="tag">Israel</a></p><p>Commtouch (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/commtouch-software-ltd/ctch/nas">CTCH</a>), a leading provider of email defense systems, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/commtouch-software-ltd/ctch/nashttp://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/commtouch-selected-by-check-point-for/n20071210050309990012">announced</a> today that Check Point Software (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/check-point-software-technologies-ltd/chkp/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">CHKP</a>) has entered into a licensing agreement with the email firm. <a href="http://israelnewsletter.com/2007/10/08/commtouch-strong-demand-for-email-defense/">Commtouch's</a> defense works on a three-pronged approach. Reputation service for blocking unwanted mail traffic at the perimeter, significantly reducing the necessary IT resources for handling email; Zero-Hour(TM) Virus Outbreak Protection to complement traditional anti-virus solutions; and Anti-spam, which works against all formats and languages including Asian languages, image spam and attachment spam.</p>
<p>Speaking to the importance of this deal, CEO Gideon Mantel said, "Check Point's choice of Commtouch as the best solution for its customers after a period of rigorous testing further validates our technology and is an important milestone for Commtouch. <a href="http://israelnewsletter.com/israeli-stocks-trading-in-the-us/">Commtouch</a> is the only technology provider of three layers of email defense that, together, ensure continued effectiveness in the face of constantly changing threats. We believe this important and strategic agreement will positively impact our business."</p>
<p>Commtouch's business has been growing rapidly. The company had set a goal for 30 new deals for all of 2007, and it had almost achieved that goal by the end of October. Clearly there is a need for email spam protection; for investors looking at a small company making headway in this field, the stock may be a very attractive long-term play.</p>
<p><em>Aaron Katsman is the lead Portfolio Manager and Managing Director of America Israel Investment Associates, LLC. and Senior Editor of </em><a href="http://www.israelnewsletter.com/"><em><font color="#0072bc">IsraelNewsletter.com</font></em></a><em>. Disclosure: Writer owns stock and is long both CTCH and CHKP , as of 12/10/07.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/10/email-defense-firm-commtouch-wins-deal-with-check-point/">Email defense firm Commtouch wins deal with Check Point</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 10 Dec 2007 08:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://finance.aol.com/quotes/commtouch-software-ltd/ctch/nas>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://finance.aol.com/quotes/commtouch-software-ltd/ctch/nashttp://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/commtouch-selected-by-check-point-for/n20071210050309990012>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://israelnewsletter.com/2007/10/08/commtouch-strong-demand-for-email-defense/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/10/email-defense-firm-commtouch-wins-deal-with-check-point/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1058852/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/10/email-defense-firm-commtouch-wins-deal-with-check-point/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Check Point</category><category>checkpoint</category><category>commtouch</category><category>email</category><category>email spam protection</category><category>EmailSpamProtection</category><category>Israel</category><category>small-cap</category><category>spam</category><category>spam protection</category><category>SpamProtection</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Katsman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 08:51:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[95% of emails are spam --damn!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/17/95-of-emails-are-spam-damn/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/17/95-of-emails-are-spam-damn/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/17/95-of-emails-are-spam-damn/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/pacman.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />According to a report issued by <a href="http://www.net-security.org/secworld.php?id=5545">Help Net Security</a>, as many as 19 of every 20 emails are spam. Thanks to good filters on my various accounts, I don't see much of this, so I was astounded to see how those most loathsome of subhumans, the spammers, have taken over the email world.<br /><br />The report is full of bad news for those of us dependent on electronic communications. One attack during the third quarter of 2007 used more than 11,000 "zombie" IP addresses (computers taken over via virus infections) to unleash a tsunami of penis enhancement and stock tip emails.<br /><br />The types of malicious spam are also evolving. Just a few months ago, I was receiving stock tip spam in the form of text saved as an image. Now that my troops have learned to discard those, the sleazebags have gone to using other file types, like PDF, Excel and Word files, to entice me to open them and thereby infect my PC. <br /><br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/17/95-of-emails-are-spam-damn/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>95% of emails are spam --damn!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/17/95-of-emails-are-spam-damn/">95% of emails are spam --damn!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 17 Oct 2007 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9507E6DF173BF931A35751C0A9629C8B63>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/17/95-of-emails-are-spam-damn/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1015606/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/17/95-of-emails-are-spam-damn/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bots</category><category>email spam</category><category>EmailSpam</category><category>internet threats</category><category>internet worms</category><category>InternetThreats</category><category>InternetWorms</category><category>spam</category><category>spam report</category><category>SpamReport</category><category>storm worm</category><category>StormWorm</category><category>trojan horses</category><category>TrojanHorses</category><category>worms</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Barlow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[eBay (EBAY) and Yahoo! (YHOO) join to prevent fraudulent email]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/08/ebay-ebay-and-yahoo-yhoo-join-up-to-prevent-fraudulent-emai/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/08/ebay-ebay-and-yahoo-yhoo-join-up-to-prevent-fraudulent-emai/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/08/ebay-ebay-and-yahoo-yhoo-join-up-to-prevent-fraudulent-emai/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/dk_image.gif" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas">eBay, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas">EBAY</a>) are partnering up this holiday season to try and keep all those nasty but legit-looking email messages out of your Yahoo! Mail inbox. Yahoo! is by far the world's most popular web-based email service and I can only imagine the effort it takes to sniff out fraudulent and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phishing">phishing email messages</a> from tens of millions of inboxes every day.<br /><br />In many cases, Yahoo! Mail users will receive official-looking messages that appears to come from eBay or its online payment division, PayPal. Those who are fooled into divulging personal information like passwords and account sign-in information usually have a large headache cleaning up the identity theft mess later. But, what if those unofficial email messages never arrived in your inbox to begin with?<br /><br />Last last week, the three companies (PayPal is a wholly-owned eBay subsidiary) announced that the DomainKeys e-mail authentication system would be <a href="http://www.internetnews.com/security/article.php/3703396">used to block malicious email messages</a> from the inboxes of Yahoo! Mail users. Yahoo! stated that the upgrade would occur over its global email network for the next few weeks, allowing it to verify the domain from which email messages arrive. In other words, those Russia-based fraud emails that look like real eBay communications may soon be blocked for good.<br /><br />This is a great initiative between the largest email provider and one of the largest commerce sites on the entire internet, and it's perfectly timed for the holiday e-commerce season that's already underway. Now, Yahoo! needs to market this new partnership in every way possible to let customers know what it is and how it can help them. Something like this does no deserve to be just working behind the scenes.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/08/ebay-ebay-and-yahoo-yhoo-join-up-to-prevent-fraudulent-emai/">eBay (EBAY) and Yahoo! (YHOO) join to prevent fraudulent email</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 08 Oct 2007 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.internetnews.com/security/article.php/3703396>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/08/ebay-ebay-and-yahoo-yhoo-join-up-to-prevent-fraudulent-emai/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1007807/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/08/ebay-ebay-and-yahoo-yhoo-join-up-to-prevent-fraudulent-emai/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>e-commerce</category><category>eBay</category><category>inthenews</category><category>PayPal</category><category>phishing</category><category>scams</category><category>spam</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Regulators crack down on spam crooks]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/03/regulators-crack-down-on-spam-crooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/03/regulators-crack-down-on-spam-crooks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/03/regulators-crack-down-on-spam-crooks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p>Regulators from countries including the United States, Canada, Nigeria, United Kingdom and the Netherlands collaborated in a tremendous crackdown on internet con-artists. The U.S. Postal Service announced that more than $2.1 billion in counterfeit checks have been seized, and 77 people have been arrested.<br /><br />Pretty much everyone has received spam from these crooks -- often written in very formal-sounding (but poor) English, an email will arrive in your inbox lamenting the sad tale of an exiled Nigerian Prince who has tens of millions in savings but no way to access it. If you can just send a few thousand, he'll be able to get the money and, as thanks for your kindness, you get to keep half!<br /><br />If these were legit, it would be one of the greatest returns on investment in history -- aside from the deal that gave the Dutch Manhattan for about $24 worth of beads. The problem is that these emails are <em>never</em> legit.<br /><br />While law enforcement should be commended for their work, there's another side to this. Is someone who sends a down-and-out stranger a few hundred dollars in the hope of getting a few million back really an <em>innocent victim</em>? It might not be as predatory as the con-artist sending the email but it also can hardly be called generous.<br /><br />This looks like a classic example of the old maxim that you can never cheat an honest man.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/03/regulators-crack-down-on-spam-crooks/">Regulators crack down on spam crooks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 03 Oct 2007 21:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D8S1RDG02.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/03/regulators-crack-down-on-spam-crooks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1004914/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/03/regulators-crack-down-on-spam-crooks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Spam</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 21:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Less annoying cell phone ads are the way of the future]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/19/less-annoying-cell-phone-ads-are-the-way-of-the-future/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/19/less-annoying-cell-phone-ads-are-the-way-of-the-future/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/19/less-annoying-cell-phone-ads-are-the-way-of-the-future/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><p>With more than two billion cell phone users in the world, advertising over mobile phones is most likely a way of the future. But it seems like every week I receive a silly, spam-like text message encouraging me to purchase overpriced ringtones or use some other expensive service. Like many cell phone users, I rarely (if ever) take action from these ads and I find them brutally annoying.</p>
<p>Interestingly, a recent Associated Press article reveals several new ways <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/08/17/financial/f094957D43.DTL&amp;feed=rss.business">advertisers are targeting the mobile phone</a> market without being so irritating. For example, cell phone users have been offered services that allow them to find the nearest restaurant, convenience store, and so forth. While this service is clearly useful for the phone-owner, the service-operators can also profit handsomely by selling spaces to the restaurants, convenience stores, and so on.</p>
<p>With the growing saturation of mobile internet use, advertising over mobile internet pages could also make sense. But it's important for advertisers to remember that excessively-commercialized websites are a powerful turn-off to readers and users. Therefore, I'd bet that mobile websites would be limited to one or two advertisements per page. According to the AP article, this mobile internet advertising business has taken off in the Japanese market where most of the country's cell phone owners also have mobile internet access.</p>
<p>Going forward, more realistic and useful advertising methods are going to become more prominent in the mobile phone space. However, mobile phone network operators must be careful with what advertising is permitted. Moves further into the spam category will incense consumers, while moves towards useful and profitable advertising will probably sit well with most consumers.</p>
<p><em>See also:</em><br /><a title="View Can AT&amp;T (T) and Verizon (VZ) make money on cell phone ads? on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/18/can-atandt-t-and-verizon-vz-make-money-on-cell-phone-ads/" target="_blank">Can AT&amp;T (T) and Verizon (VZ) make money on cell phone ads?</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/19/less-annoying-cell-phone-ads-are-the-way-of-the-future/">Less annoying cell phone ads are the way of the future</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 19 Aug 2007 17:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/19/less-annoying-cell-phone-ads-are-the-way-of-the-future/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/968661/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/19/less-annoying-cell-phone-ads-are-the-way-of-the-future/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cell phone advertising</category><category>mobile phone</category><category>spam</category><category>text messages</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Kelly]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 17:10:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
