<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Closing Bell: A win or a head-scratcher? (CSCO, ADBE, BIDU, SVNT, ETFC, FDX, STSI, YGE)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/17/closing-bell-a-win-or-a-head-scratcher-csco-adbe-bidu-svnt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/17/closing-bell-a-win-or-a-head-scratcher-csco-adbe-bidu-svnt/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/17/closing-bell-a-win-or-a-head-scratcher-csco-adbe-bidu-svnt/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/csco/" rel="tag">Cisco Systems (CSCO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/adbe/" rel="tag">Adobe Systems (ADBE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fdx/" rel="tag">FedEx Corp (FDX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/etfc/" rel="tag">E*TRADE (ETFC)</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-black-white.jpg" alt="" />Today had all the earmarks in line for another solid day of sell-offs, yet the markets held ground considering the tone this morning. The good news was low inflation, the <a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/06/17/is-that-inflation-in-your-pocket-or-are-you-just-happy/">lowest in over 50 years</a>. <br /><br />But agriculture stocks were hammered on overseas competitive news about <a href="http:// http://247wallst.com/2009/06/17/potash-and-fertilizer-stocks-skunked-by-news-from-germany-pot-mos-mon-agu-cf-ipi-moo-syt/">weak pricing and demand</a>. Then came a <a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/06/17/sp-looking-for-more-bank-losses-wfc-cma-usb-bbt-rf-cof-fitb-hban-snv-wtny-fas/">banking downgrade</a> from the S&amp;P playing catch-up. Despite the mixed performance at the end of the day, this felt like a win. Here are the unofficial closing bell levels:<br /><br />DJIA: 8,497.18 (-7.49) <br />S&amp;P 500: 910. 71 (-1.26)<br />NASDAQ: 1,808.06 (+11.88)<br /><br /><a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/06/17/top-analyst-upgrades-apa-bidu-bhp-std-bk-cent-ivz-qcom-svnt-stt-txn/">Top Analyst Calls</a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/17/closing-bell-a-win-or-a-head-scratcher-csco-adbe-bidu-svnt/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Closing Bell: A win or a head-scratcher? (CSCO, ADBE, BIDU, SVNT, ETFC, FDX, STSI, YGE)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/17/closing-bell-a-win-or-a-head-scratcher-csco-adbe-bidu-svnt/">Closing Bell: A win or a head-scratcher? (CSCO, ADBE, BIDU, SVNT, ETFC, FDX, STSI, YGE)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/17/closing-bell-a-win-or-a-head-scratcher-csco-adbe-bidu-svnt/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19070335/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/17/closing-bell-a-win-or-a-head-scratcher-csco-adbe-bidu-svnt/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ADBE</category><category>BIDU</category><category>CSCO</category><category>ETFC</category><category>FDX</category><category>STSI</category><category>SVNT</category><category>YGE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reynold's American (RAI) wins patent dispute]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/17/reynolds-american-rai-wins-patent-dispute/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/17/reynolds-american-rai-wins-patent-dispute/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/17/reynolds-american-rai-wins-patent-dispute/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><a target="_blank" href="http://ir.reynoldsamerican.com/index.cfm"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="RAI logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/rai-reynolds-american-logo.jpg" /></a><a href="http:// http://finance.aol.com/quotes/reynolds-american-inc/rai/nys">Reynolds American</a> (NYSE: <a href="http:// http://finance.aol.com/quotes/reynolds-american-inc/rai/nys">RAI</a> - <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/reynolds-american-inc/rai/nys/option-chains">option chain</a>) shares are rising today after a federal jury ruled that the company did not infringe upon <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/star-scientific-inc/stsi/nas">Star Scientific Inc.</a>'s<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/star-scientific-inc/stsi/nas"> </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/star-scientific-inc/stsi/nas">STSI</a>) patents regarding a method to reduce cancer-causing toxins in tobacco. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsnews/idINN1639002620090616?rpc=33">The jury determined the two STSI patents at issue were not valid</a>. STSI is expected to file an appeal. If you think that the stock won't fall by too much in the coming months, then now could be a good time to look at a bullish hedged trade on RAI.<br /><br />RAI opened this morning at $37.03. So far today the stock has hit a low of $36.86 and a high of $37.97. As of 12:20, RAI is trading at $37.29 up.96 cents(2.6%). The chart for RAI looks neutral and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline">S&amp;P</a> gives RAI a neutral 3 STARS (out of 5) hold ranking.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/17/reynolds-american-rai-wins-patent-dispute/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Reynold's American (RAI) wins patent dispute</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/17/reynolds-american-rai-wins-patent-dispute/">Reynold's American (RAI) wins patent dispute</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/17/reynolds-american-rai-wins-patent-dispute/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19070048/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/17/reynolds-american-rai-wins-patent-dispute/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>investors observer</category><category>InvestorsObserver</category><category>options</category><category>patent</category><category>RAI</category><category>reynoldsamerican</category><category>Star Scientific</category><category>StarScientific</category><category>STSI</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Star Scientific court decisions due tomorrow]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/18/star-scientific-court-decisions-due-tomorrow/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/18/star-scientific-court-decisions-due-tomorrow/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/18/star-scientific-court-decisions-due-tomorrow/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a></p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/01/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" alt="" /></a>According to a Dow Jones report yesterday, the decisions to three pending Star Scientific, Inc. (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/star-scientific-inc/stsi/nas">STSI</a>) summary-judgment motions in the company's patent-infringement lawsuit against Reynolds American Inc's (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/reynolds-american-inc/rai/nys">RAI</a>) R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. will be available on tomorrow.<br /><br />The patent-infringement suit has been ongoing since 2001, when Star Scientific filed against Reynolds, alleging that Reynolds had violated the company's process to reduce the level of nitrosamines - a carcinogenic toxin - in tobacco.<br /><br />Star Scientific's stock rose from $3.39 to $4.40 yesterday on the news the decisions had been reached, and could rise again significantly should those decisions go its way. Additionally, if Reynolds is ordered to pay a significant enough sum, the tobacco giant may decide to simply buy out Star Scientific rather than pay a hefty patent-infringement fine.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/18/star-scientific-court-decisions-due-tomorrow/">Star Scientific court decisions due tomorrow</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/star-scientific-court-post-patent-case/story.aspx?guid=%7BCEABCFA8-C3C7-470E-BAC2-6C22D650657F%7D>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/18/star-scientific-court-decisions-due-tomorrow/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/738503/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/18/star-scientific-court-decisions-due-tomorrow/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>infringement</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>patent</category><category>rai</category><category>reynolds</category><category>star</category><category>star scientific</category><category>StarScientific</category><category>stsi</category><category>tobacco</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:30:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
