<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Is Activision Blizzard in a buying mood? Should it be?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/07/is-activision-blizzard-in-a-buying-mood-should-it-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/07/is-activision-blizzard-in-a-buying-mood-should-it-be/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/07/is-activision-blizzard-in-a-buying-mood-should-it-be/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/erts/" rel="tag">Electronic Arts (ERTS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/atvi/" rel="tag">Activision Inc (ATVI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img height="147" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/ttwo.jpg" width="220" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /> According to speculation in various <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=aHj2T0wkztkU">news outlets</a> and blogs, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/activision-blizzard-inc/atvi/nas">Activision Blizzard</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/activision-blizzard-inc/atvi/nas">ATVI</a>) may end up doing something with its huge cash position. The software publisher, most famous these days for its <em>Guitar Hero</em> property, has around $3 billion in its coffers. The question is, should Activision Blizzard spend its cash on an acquisition as opposed to doing other things with the money, like pay a special dividend or increase its buyback?</p>
<p>Considering that assets are cheap because of the recession, I'd say that a little shopping might not be such a bad idea. Here's <a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-flush-with-cash-activision-eyes-rival-studios-and-games-for-acquisition/">an article</a> that discusses the possibility of Activision Blizzard taking over <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/take-two-interactive-software-inc/ttwo/nas">Take-Two</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/take-two-interactive-software-inc/ttwo/nas">TTWO</a>) distributor of <em>Grand Theft Auto</em>. Then there's the <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/dealscape/2009/03/nasdaq_atvi_activision_blizzar.php">concept of buying</a> up <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/thq-inc/thqi/nas">THQ</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/thq-inc/thqi/nas">THQI</a>). Perhaps the company could take <em>Mortal Kombat</em> off the corporate hands of Midway Games.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/07/is-activision-blizzard-in-a-buying-mood-should-it-be/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is Activision Blizzard in a buying mood? Should it be?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/07/is-activision-blizzard-in-a-buying-mood-should-it-be/">Is Activision Blizzard in a buying mood? Should it be?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 07 Mar 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/07/is-activision-blizzard-in-a-buying-mood-should-it-be/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1481429/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/07/is-activision-blizzard-in-a-buying-mood-should-it-be/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>activision blizzard</category><category>ATVI</category><category>destroy all humans</category><category>Electronic Arts</category><category>ERTS</category><category>inthenews</category><category>midway games</category><category>mortal kombat</category><category>saints row</category><category>Take-Two</category><category>THQ</category><category>THQI</category><category>TTWO</category><category>video games</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[THQ below $10: Is it worth your time?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/thq-below-10-is-it-worth-your-time/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/thq-below-10-is-it-worth-your-time/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/thq-below-10-is-it-worth-your-time/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/erts/" rel="tag">Electronic Arts (ERTS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/atvi/" rel="tag">Activision Inc (ATVI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/thq-inc/thqi/nas">THQ</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/thq-inc/thqi/nas">THQI</a>), arch competitor of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/activision-blizzard-inc/atvi/nas">Activision Blizzard</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/activision-blizzard-inc/atvi/nas">ATVI</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/electronic-arts-inc/erts/nas">Electronic Arts</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/electronic-arts-inc/erts/nas">ERTS</a>), closed under $10 per share on Monday; $9.90 to be exact. It hit a new 52-week low of $9.30 intraday. I've got to admit, THQ under $10 a share sparks my interest. </p>
<p>I also must concede that my interest might be a bit on the irrational side to some degree. After all, I was a big fan of THQ during the time oh so long ago when all its cylinders were firing and the stock was a pretty cool investment. Now that it's hit the magical spectrum of single-digit, does that event alone changes things on a fundamental level? Am I just looking for a reason to buy a stock I once liked and praised? <br /></p>
<p>As of late, problems have befallen THQ. Questions about the quality of its pipeline and delays of key video-game product have plagued the publisher. Indeed, THQ was a weakening company and a weak stock. Why invest in THQ when Activision Blizzard exists? There's definitely sound logic to such thinking. However, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/financials/thq-inc/thqi/nas/key-ratios">THQ is around book value</a> at $10 per share. And the fact that THQ has some cool intellectual properties at its disposal (<em>Destroy All Humans!</em>, <em>Saint's Row</em>, etc.), as well as a cool licensing partner in <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">Viacom</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>) and its Nickelodeon characters, means you've got to figure that the company might start becoming a value at some point.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/thq-below-10-is-it-worth-your-time/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>THQ below $10: Is it worth your time?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/thq-below-10-is-it-worth-your-time/">THQ below $10: Is it worth your time?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 07 Oct 2008 11:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://finance.aol.com/company/thq-inc/thqi/nas/10-Q/08997503/html/sec-filings>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/thq-below-10-is-it-worth-your-time/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1334854/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/thq-below-10-is-it-worth-your-time/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Activision Blizzard</category><category>ActivisionBlizzard</category><category>ATVI</category><category>Destroy All Humans</category><category>DestroyAllHumans</category><category>Electronic Arts</category><category>ElectronicArts</category><category>ERTS</category><category>Saints Row</category><category>SaintsRow</category><category>THQ</category><category>THQI</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><category>video games</category><category>VideoGames</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 11:45:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
