<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Censoring Santa in Sydney: No to Ho, Ho, Ho]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/15/censoring-santa-in-sydney-no-to-ho-ho-ho/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/15/censoring-santa-in-sydney-no-to-ho-ho-ho/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/15/censoring-santa-in-sydney-no-to-ho-ho-ho/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/santa-claus-ho-ho-ho.jpg" alt="" />So this is pretty stupid: Santas in Sydney are being urged to say "Ha, Ha, Ha," instead of "Ho, Ho, Ho."<br /><br /><a href="http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,22737250-5006301,00.html">According to FOX News</a>, "Recruitment firm <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/westaff-inc/wstf/nas">Westaff</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/westaff-inc/wstf/nas">WSTF</a>) -- which supplies hundreds of Santas across the country -- has told its trainees that the "Ho Ho Ho" phrase could frighten children and could even be derogatory to women."<br /><br />"Ho, Ho, Ho" is offensive? I could understand if Santas were walking around calling people <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/13/imus-freedom-of-speech-and-money/">nappy-headed 'hos</a>, but the reality is that "ho, ho, ho" has been around a lot longer than the other connotation made popular in song lyrics.<br /><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/photos/tis-the-season-to-boycott-would-christmas-by-any-other-name-be-so-controversial/">'Tis the season to boycott: Would Christmas by any other name be so controversial?</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/photos/tis-the-season-to-boycott-would-christmas-by-any-other-name-be-so-controversial/510045/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/miracle_tree_thumbnail.jpg" alt="'Miracle' Trees: Is this another attack on Christmas?" title="'Miracle' Trees: Is this another attack on Christmas?" /></a><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/photos/tis-the-season-to-boycott-would-christmas-by-any-other-name-be-so-controversial/494688/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/lowes_family_trees_thumbnail.jpg" alt="Celebrate 'Family Trees' with Lowe's" title="Celebrate 'Family Trees' with Lowe's" /></a><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/photos/tis-the-season-to-boycott-would-christmas-by-any-other-name-be-so-controversial/495953/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/santa_ho_ho_no_thumbnail.jpg" alt="No Ho, Santa!" title="No Ho, Santa!" /></a><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/photos/tis-the-season-to-boycott-would-christmas-by-any-other-name-be-so-controversial/498475/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/merry_christmas_card_thumbnail.jpg" alt="Un-Merry Christmas: U.K. elementary school bans Christmas cards" title="Un-Merry Christmas: U.K. elementary school bans Christmas cards" /></a><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/photos/tis-the-season-to-boycott-would-christmas-by-any-other-name-be-so-controversial/498462/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/walmart_toys_fortyseven_thumbnail.jpg" alt="Sacreligious toys at Wal-Mart?" title="Sacreligious toys at Wal-Mart?" /></a></div><br /><br />Is there anyone reading this who doesn't think this is completely nuts (sorry, "insane")? If so, leave a comment and explain, because I don't get it.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/15/censoring-santa-in-sydney-no-to-ho-ho-ho/">Censoring Santa in Sydney: No to Ho, Ho, Ho</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:17:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/15/censoring-santa-in-sydney-no-to-ho-ho-ho/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1041225/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/15/censoring-santa-in-sydney-no-to-ho-ho-ho/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>expire-images:2008-11-14</category><category>ho ho ho</category><category>HoHoHo</category><category>holidash</category><category>santa</category><category>sydney</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:17:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Censoring Santa: Sydney says no, no, no to Ho, Ho, Ho]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/15/censoring-santa-sydney-says-no-no-no-to-ho-ho-ho/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/15/censoring-santa-sydney-says-no-no-no-to-ho-ho-ho/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/15/censoring-santa-sydney-says-no-no-no-to-ho-ho-ho/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/santa_everett.jpg" />Christmas (or should I say "Xmas" -- "the holiday season" maybe?) continues to be criminalized and the companies that make a business of tinsel, gaily wrapped packages and "ho, ho, ho" don't know whether to embrace or hide from the specter of political incorrectness.<br /><br />I'm sorry. Did I offend you?<br /><br />In the latest blow to the no-longer-holy holidays, Santas in Sydney, Australia are being urged to say "ha, ha, ha," instead of "ho, ho, ho."<br /><br /><a href="http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,22737250-5006301,00.html">Recruitment firm </a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/westaff-inc/wstf/nas">Westaff</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/westaff-inc/wstf/nas">WSTF</a>), which contracts with hundreds of Santas, sending them to stores and social appearances throughout Australia, has re-vamped its training. It's telling would-be Santas that the "ho ho ho" phrase "could frighten children and could even be derogatory to women," <a href="http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,22737250-5006301,00.html">according to an Australian newspaper</a>.<br /><br /><iframe width="205" height="200" frameborder="0" align="right" src="http://webcenter.polls.aol.com/modular.jsp?template=1381&amp;view=126516&amp;pollId=126616&amp;channel=aol_us_moneynews2&amp;popup=yes"></iframe>As <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/15/censoring-santa-in-sydney-no-to-ho-ho-ho/">Zac Bissonnette says</a>, "ho, ho, ho" is offensive? I could understand if Santas were walking around calling people <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/13/imus-freedom-of-speech-and-money/">nappy-headed 'hos</a>," but Santa's jolly greeting is more kid lit than gangsta rap.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/15/censoring-santa-sydney-says-no-no-no-to-ho-ho-ho/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Censoring Santa: Sydney says no, no, no to Ho, Ho, Ho</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/15/censoring-santa-sydney-says-no-no-no-to-ho-ho-ho/">Censoring Santa: Sydney says no, no, no to Ho, Ho, Ho</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:52:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,311797,00.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/15/censoring-santa-sydney-says-no-no-no-to-ho-ho-ho/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1040822/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/15/censoring-santa-sydney-says-no-no-no-to-ho-ho-ho/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Australia</category><category>censorship</category><category>Ho Ho Ho</category><category>HoHoHo</category><category>holidash</category><category>political correctness</category><category>PoliticalCorrectness</category><category>politically correct</category><category>PoliticallyCorrect</category><category>Santa</category><category>Santa Claus</category><category>SantaClaus</category><category>Sydney</category><category>Westaff</category><category>WSTF</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:52:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
