When Sears Holdings (NYSE: SHLD) reports Q3 earnings tomorrow, we'll see again if chairman and out-of-his-retail-league financier Eddie Lampert will wow investors.

Regardless of how its retail operations have performed, how is Sears doing when it comes to returning equity to shareholders? Now that William Ackman has taken a 3.5% stake in the holding company (oops, retailer), will that investment start paying off tomorrow? Lampert still controls 46% of the retailer, so with activist investor Ackman's new slice, it's unclear if he'll soon be forcing any changes at the company. But, in previous stints, Ackman has forced real estate sales and similar actions at large food service companies and other retailers to get his return. Things are different in Lampert-land, though.

The company has so far underperformed from the retail side of the business, and it's probably forced Lampert to wake up and and realize he has to ensure those operations continue to perform. Analysts polled by Thomson Financial expect a profit of $0.50 on revenue of $11.61 billion tomorrow.

Will we see that? Perhaps. It is still not clear how long it will take Lampert to unlock the value of his grand masterpiece, but so far it's either not working and impatience from the market is bubbling up.

Sears Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: SHLD) released its first-quarter numbers and the results looked like a reason to celebrate as profits jumped up by 20%. Where did that 20% come from? How about insurance money from Sears locations damaged by 2005 hurricanes and an unrelated legal settlement? In other words, the boring business of retail in Kmart and Sears stores really did not contribute to success here. Surprised?

Net income for the quarter rose to $216 million from $180 million while sales fell 2.5% to $11.7 billion. Yawn. In addition, same-store sales for the quarter fell 3.9% on less demand for home appliances at Sears and slower sales of health and beauty products at Kmart. Since I'm sure many Americans buy health and beauty products at Kmart, I think I'm buying the home appliance sales slowdown in Sears stores more as a reason here. But could that alone have contributed to a 3.9% same-store sales decline?

With Sears Holdings being more of an investment house and clearinghouse for Eddie Lampert rather than a thriving retailer bent on increasing market share, these results aren't surprising. From my experience, Sears stores are mostly dirty locations with what seems like a 1980s-era merchandising mindset (not sure about Kmart -- someone want to chime in here?).

Same-store sales have fallen every quarter since Sears and Kmart combined in 2005 and they don't look to get any better soon. Let's see if Lampert is serious about actually spending money to improve the retailer's operations here. So far, zilch -- and it shows.