Securities and Exchange Commission posts
FeedPosted Nov 3rd 2009 10:20AM by Tom Johansmeyer (RSS feed)
Filed under: Scandals, Mutual funds, Headline news
Investors are calling for an inquiry into mutual fund fees, but the Supreme Court is reminding them that it isn't beholden to public opinion. The mutual fund industry is being accused of charging "excessive" fees, which could be particularly harsh on individual investors who use these tools as their primary way to access the market. Currently, the mutual fund industry has more than $10 trillion in assets under management, some of it through retirement and 529 college savings plans.
The Court doesn't seem inclined to step into the fray, saying that regulatory agencies are better equipped to address the situation. Chief Justice John Roberts, for example, said during arguments that "It makes a lot more sense to have the SEC regulate rates than to have courts do it, doesn't it?"
Continue reading Supreme Court pushes back on mutual fund issue
Posted Jul 29th 2009 11:30AM by Mark Fightmaster (RSS feed)
Filed under: Law, Scandals
So, here's one for you -- according to Joseph Cotchett (a lawyer for some of Bernie Madoff's victims), Bernie Madoff is surprised that his Ponzi scheme lasted as long as it did. The revelation came during a 4.5 hour interview, wherein Madoff revealed how the scheme worked and how securities regulators didn't catch him. Madoff did apologize, repeatedly, for the harm he caused victims.
The most interesting part of the interview is when Madoff described meetings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) while he was committing the fraud and how the SEC was unable to catch him, which didn't surprise him. These comments lead Cotchett to theorize that "many people" were negligent, including the government watchdog agencies. Let's not forget that the SEC has seen no evidence of wrongdoing by its staff as far as the Madoff situation is concerned. Nevertheless, the SEC has undergone many changes in order to continue to protect investors and the market.
Continue reading Bernie Madoff expresses surprise at how long his scheme lasted
Posted Jul 19th 2009 4:00PM by Tom Johansmeyer (RSS feed)
Filed under: Bad news, Scandals
David Friehling is only the second person to face criminal charges in the Bernard Madoff debacle. He served as Madoff's auditor from 1991 to 2008, though it's hard to say if they'll resume their relationship as cellies. For now, Friehling has only been charged (innocent until proven guilty, and such) with securities fraud, abetting investment adviser fraud and filing false reports with the SEC. On five of the six charges filed, he faces a 20-year maximum.
It's alleged that Friehling didn't conduct "meaningful" audits while in Madoff's employ, despite issuing reports saying that he'd done his job -- which paid close to $15,000 a month (no work for big pay . . . where do I sign up?). In particular, he's said to have not bothered to verify Madoff's business assets, revenue sources or bank accounts. This is no-brainer stuff for an auditor.
Continue reading Madoff bean-counter pleads not guilty
Posted Jun 29th 2009 11:00AM by Elizabeth Harrow (RSS feed)
Filed under: SEC filings, Bad news, Options
State Street Corp. (NYSE: STT) said today that its State Street Bank & Trust Co. unit received a Wells Notice from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The notice, which indicates that civil charges may be brought against the company, relates to disclosures and management of certain fixed-income strategies during 2007 and previous periods.
Some investors have accused State Street of misleading them about the risks involved in mortgage-related investments. A legal reserve fund worth $625 million was established in 2007 to cover investor claims, and $418 million has already been paid out. The firm says it is currently cooperating with the SEC, as well as state and other regulators.
Continue reading State Street unit slapped with Wells Notice
Posted Jul 20th 2008 1:10PM by Gary E. Sattler (RSS feed)
Filed under: Good news, Law, Scandals
A lot was said this past week in regard to the SEC attack on rumor mongering and willful misrepresentation of facts for the benefit of naked short sellers. One point that I'd like to make perfectly clear is this: The SEC's indicated desire to quash the spreading of false negative information by, and for the benefit of, manipulative short sellers, is nothing even remotely akin to a First Amendment issue. The First Amendment does not give protection to slanderers, liars, and sabotage artists. I'd also like to make clear my opinion that honest short selling is a positive, healthy, and necessary practice. I believe it helps to define and benchmark real value within the markets.
The Los Angels Times reported that SEC Chairman Christopher Cox may have his hands full in the wake of a measure that protects nearly two dozen large financial firms from naked short selling. The measure requires "anyone effecting a short sale in these securities (to) arrange beforehand to borrow the securities and deliver them at settlement." It's a rule that is long over due for enforcement and that shall most probably, at least temporarily, lay to rest some serious market abuses.
Continue reading The changing face of short selling
Posted Jun 26th 2008 10:22AM by Victoria Erhart (RSS feed)
Filed under: Analyst upgrades and downgrades, Bad news, Law, Employees, Scandals, Japan
If you have an ADR for Japanese electronics giant NEC, save it as a collectible. In light of the SEC's recent decision to
revoke NEC's securities registration in the U.S., there will not be any more of those ADRs. NEC ran afoul of U.S. listing requirements when it failed to file annual reports for 2006 and 2007, and improperly booked revenues for 2000-2006. NEC was also the victim of internal fraud when at least 10 emplyees, over a period of several years, booked millions of dollars worth of fraudulent transactions. NEC had no procedures in place to authenticate or track these transactions.
To be fair to NEC, recognizing software sales revenue up front in complicated under GAAP SOP 97-2, particularly when the software is sold as part of a service package that also includes hardware and/or software maintenance. But NEC was responsible for taking steps to see it was not being robbed blind from within. NEC was delisted from active trading on Nasdaq in November 2007. NEC neither accepted nor disputed the SEC decision. The company has also been under investigation by the Tokyo Regional Taxation Bureau. NEC states it has constructed sufficient internal controls to cut back on the potential for internal fraud. Too little, too late. The stock now trades on the pink sheets.
Posted Apr 28th 2008 5:24PM by Joseph Lazzaro (RSS feed)
Filed under: Other issues, Housing, Recession
The perceptive and common sense-rooted
Ben Stein, in a
business column in The New York Times, has weighed-in on the credit crisis, and for market absolutists, it's an argument they probably don't want to hear.
Stein, like many of us, has pondered how the massively well-paid men and women of Wall Street could create such a catastrophe. How did some of the smartest, talented executives,
Stein ruminates, generate such immense losses that "they made banks clam up on lending -- at great risk to the economy?"
Compelling questionsStein asks: Where were the fail-safe devices? The government watchdogs? The ratings agencies? A speech by Greenlight Capital hedge fund manager David Einhorn at a Grant's Interest Rate Observer event, provided the answers -- the unfortunate truths of the recent housing/credit boom --
which Stein summarized: Continue reading Ben Stein: Perhaps the market isn't always right
Posted Mar 4th 2008 2:14PM by Joseph Lazzaro (RSS feed)
Filed under: Bad news, Options
You can add another item to the list of things the market has to be worried about.
In this month's Portfolio magazine, Michael Lewis wonders if the Black-Scholes formula -- the formula used to calculate and manage risk throughout the financial world, including determining the risk of trade positions and hedging strategies -- is flawed.
The Black-Scholes formula is an advanced mathematical formula generally credited with revolutionizing options pricing. Its assumptions are the basis for short trades and options designed to protect a trader against losses, no matter how much the market falls.
However, as Lewis outlines, while the formula has been good, it is not perfect, as evidenced by the October 1987 stock market crash, when traders and institutions learned that even with Black-Scholes techniques deployed, when the market is crashing and no one is willing to buy, it's impossible to sell short. The outcome? On "Black Monday," the Dow Jones Industrial Average plunged 508 points or 22.6% on October 19, 1987.
Continue reading Another Wall Street worry: A (potentially) flawed risk formula
Posted Dec 4th 2007 6:01PM by Zac Bissonnette (RSS feed)
Filed under: Management, Scandals
Last week, I wrote
about the SEC's horrible new rule making it easier for companies to keep outside candidates for director off the ballot.
But after Gary Weiss
chastised SEC Chairman Chris Cox and the media for not paying attention, I had to return to the topic. Weiss's comments are right on:
... the media has been comparatively silent over the SEC's capitulation to corporate lobbyists, such as the Business Roundtable and U.S. Chamber of Commerce ... Chris Cox, very much a "politician" as Gretchen points out, is blowing with the wind -- which is an utter indifference to investor rights in the Bush administration.Continue reading Why should investors lose a voice in who runs their companies?
Posted Oct 18th 2007 8:19AM by Paul Foster (RSS feed)
Filed under: Bank of America (BAC), , Options, Housing
Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) volatility at 23 into 3Q net income decline of 32% to $3.7 billion. BAC is recently trading at $48.46 in pre-open trading, below Wednesday's close of $50.03. BAC reported Q3 EPS of 82 cents vs. consensus estimates of $1.05. BAC November option implied volatility of 23 is near 26-week average of 21 according to Track Data, suggesting non-directional risk.
Countrywide (NYSE: CFC), a U.S. home mortgage lender, closed Wednesday at $17.35. The Wall Street Journal says "The Securities and Exchange Commission has opened an informal investigation into stock sales by CFC's CEO, according to people familiar with the matter." CFC Chairman, CEO & founder is Angelo Mozilo. CFC is expected to report EPS on 10/26. CFC November option implied volatility of 74 is above its 26-week average of 59 according to Track Data, suggesting larger risk.
Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) is recently down $1.24 to $171.51 in pre-open trading. AAPL will report Q4 EPS on October 22. AAPL November option implied volatility of 54 is above its 26-week average of 43 according to Track Data, suggesting larger price movement.
Daily options Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com.
Visit AOL Money & Finance for more earnings coverage
Next Page >