<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Two more arrests in Madoff saga]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/two-more-arrests-in-madoff-saga/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/two-more-arrests-in-madoff-saga/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/two-more-arrests-in-madoff-saga/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><p><em><img hspace="4" height="300" width="200" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/07/alcatraz_prison_jail_1009101_l.jpg" alt="" />Normal tech support phone call: "Press 1 for help with e-mail. Press 2 to have your password reset."</em></p>
<p><em>Madoff tech support phone call: "Hello, how can I help you dummy up some trading records today?"</em></p>
<p>The investigation of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/BernieMadoff/">Bernie Madoff</a>'s fraudulent financial empire is leading to more arrests. Jerome O'Hara and George Perez, both computer programmers employed by the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Ponzi/">Ponzi</a> schemer, were arrested by the FBI on Friday morning. The charges include conspiracy for falsifying books and records. They are accused of <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSN1346294620091113 " target="_blank">doing the deed</a> for the boss and accepting hush money -- in the form of 25% raises and net bonuses of $60,000 -- to keep the scam afloat.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/two-more-arrests-in-madoff-saga/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Two more arrests in Madoff saga</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/two-more-arrests-in-madoff-saga/">Two more arrests in Madoff saga</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSN1346294620091113>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/two-more-arrests-in-madoff-saga/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19239249/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/two-more-arrests-in-madoff-saga/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>arrest</category><category>arrested</category><category>arrests</category><category>BernardMadoff</category><category>bernie madoff</category><category>BernieMadoff</category><category>criminal</category><category>fbi</category><category>Federal Bureau of Investigation</category><category>FederalBureauOfInvestigation</category><category>fraud</category><category>Information Technology</category><category>InformationTechnology</category><category>litigation</category><category>madoff</category><category>madoff securities</category><category>MadoffPonziScheme</category><category>MadoffScandal</category><category>MadoffSecurities</category><category>programmer</category><category>programmers</category><category>prosecution</category><category>prosecutions</category><category>SEC</category><category>Securities and Exchange Commission</category><category>SecuritiesAndExchangeCommission</category><category>technology</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Supreme Court pushes back on mutual fund issue]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/supreme-court-pushes-back-on-mutual-fund-issue/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/supreme-court-pushes-back-on-mutual-fund-issue/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/supreme-court-pushes-back-on-mutual-fund-issue/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/funds/" rel="tag">Mutual Funds</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><p><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/perfi/funds/2009-11-02-mutual-funds-supreme-court-_N.htm" target="_blank"><img border="0" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/oakmark-sm.jpg" width="220" height="196" alt="" />Investors are calling for an inquiry</a> into mutual fund fees, but the Supreme Court is reminding them that it isn't beholden to public opinion. The mutual fund industry is being accused of charging "excessive" fees, which could be particularly harsh on individual investors who use these tools as their primary way to access the market. Currently, the mutual fund industry has more than $10 trillion in assets under management, some of it through retirement and 529 college savings plans. </p>
<p>The Court doesn't seem inclined to step into the fray, saying that regulatory agencies are better equipped to address the situation. Chief Justice John Roberts, for example, said during arguments that "It makes a lot more sense to have the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/SEC/">SEC</a> regulate rates than to have courts do it, doesn't it?"</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/supreme-court-pushes-back-on-mutual-fund-issue/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Supreme Court pushes back on mutual fund issue</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/supreme-court-pushes-back-on-mutual-fund-issue/">Supreme Court pushes back on mutual fund issue</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/perfi/funds/2009-11-02-mutual-funds-supreme-court-_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/supreme-court-pushes-back-on-mutual-fund-issue/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19219989/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/supreme-court-pushes-back-on-mutual-fund-issue/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>antonin scalia</category><category>AntoninScalia</category><category>chief justice</category><category>ChiefJustice</category><category>fees</category><category>inthenews</category><category>john roberts</category><category>JohnRoberts</category><category>mutual fund</category><category>MutualFund</category><category>oakmark fund</category><category>OakmarkFund</category><category>sec</category><category>securities and exchange commission</category><category>SecuritiesAndExchangeCommission</category><category>stephen breyer</category><category>StephenBreyer</category><category>supreme court</category><category>SupremeCourt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Madoff bean-counter pleads not guilty]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/19/madoff-bean-counter-pleads-not-guilty/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/19/madoff-bean-counter-pleads-not-guilty/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/19/madoff-bean-counter-pleads-not-guilty/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/lunch-money.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />David Friehling is only the second person to face criminal charges in the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/BernardMadoff/">Bernard Madoff</a> debacle. He served as <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/brokerage/2009-07-17-madoff-auditor-pleads_N.htm" target="_blank">Madoff's auditor from 1991 to 2008</a>, though it's hard to say if they'll resume their relationship as cellies. For now, Friehling has only been charged (innocent until proven guilty, and such) with securities fraud, abetting investment adviser fraud and filing false reports with the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/SEC/">SEC</a>. On five of the six charges filed, he faces a 20-year maximum. </p>
<p>It's alleged that Friehling didn't conduct "meaningful" audits while in Madoff's employ, despite issuing reports saying that he'd done his job -- which paid close to $15,000 a month (no work for big pay . . .  where do I sign up?). In particular, he's said to have not bothered to verify Madoff's business assets, revenue sources or bank accounts. This is no-brainer stuff for an <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/auditor/">auditor</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/19/madoff-bean-counter-pleads-not-guilty/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Madoff bean-counter pleads not guilty</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/19/madoff-bean-counter-pleads-not-guilty/">Madoff bean-counter pleads not guilty</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 19 Jul 2009 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/brokerage/2009-07-17-madoff-auditor-pleads_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/19/madoff-bean-counter-pleads-not-guilty/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19102624/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/19/madoff-bean-counter-pleads-not-guilty/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>accountant</category><category>accounting</category><category>auditor</category><category>bernard madoff</category><category>BernardMadoff</category><category>bernie madoff</category><category>BernieMadoff</category><category>featured</category><category>fraud</category><category>madoff</category><category>madoff scandal</category><category>madoff securities</category><category>madoffponzischeme</category><category>MadoffScandal</category><category>MadoffSecurities</category><category>scandal</category><category>sec</category><category>securities and exchange commission</category><category>securities fraud</category><category>SecuritiesAndExchangeCommission</category><category>SecuritiesFraud</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ponzi manager pleads guilty and settles civil charges]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/26/ponzi-manager-pleads-guilty-and-settles-civil-charges/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/26/ponzi-manager-pleads-guilty-and-settles-civil-charges/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/26/ponzi-manager-pleads-guilty-and-settles-civil-charges/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><div style="display: block;" id="imageResults"><img width="240" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="171" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/cuffs1.jpg" /></div>
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Hedgefund/">Hedge fund</a> manager Michael Regan <a target="_blank" href="http://www.finalternatives.com/node/8346">has pleaded guilty to running a Ponzi scheme</a>. Manager of the Massachusetts-based River Stream Fund, he admitted to defrauding around 70 investors. The fund held just shy of $20 million in assets ... despite the relatively meager $101,600 sitting in its accounts. The fund purported to return 20 percent a year since 2001, paying out $9 million in "profits" and returned capital. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/26/ponzi-manager-pleads-guilty-and-settles-civil-charges/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ponzi manager pleads guilty and settles civil charges</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/26/ponzi-manager-pleads-guilty-and-settles-civil-charges/">Ponzi manager pleads guilty and settles civil charges</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.finalternatives.com/node/8346>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/26/ponzi-manager-pleads-guilty-and-settles-civil-charges/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19079668/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/26/ponzi-manager-pleads-guilty-and-settles-civil-charges/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>fraud</category><category>fraud investigation</category><category>FraudInvestigation</category><category>frauds</category><category>hedge fund</category><category>hedge fund collapse</category><category>hedge funds</category><category>HedgeFund</category><category>HedgeFundCollapse</category><category>HedgeFunds</category><category>inthenews</category><category>massachusetts</category><category>ponzi</category><category>ponzi scheme</category><category>ponzi schemes</category><category>PonziScheme</category><category>PonziSchemes</category><category>sec</category><category>securities and exchange commission</category><category>SecuritiesAndExchangeCommission</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Matrixx Initiatives plummets to 11-year low on SEC inquiry]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/23/matrixx-initiatives-plummets-to-11-year-low-on-sec-inquiry/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/23/matrixx-initiatives-plummets-to-11-year-low-on-sec-inquiry/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/23/matrixx-initiatives-plummets-to-11-year-low-on-sec-inquiry/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/matrixx-initiatives-inc/mtxx/nas">Matrixx Initiatives</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/matrixx-initiatives-inc/mtxx/nas">MTXX</a>), maker of the allegedly scent-stealing Zicam nasal swabs, tumbled to a new annual low this morning on news that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is <a href="http://www.streetinsider.com/Corporate+News/Matrixx+Initiatives+%28MTXX%29+Receives+Informal+Inquiry+from+SEC+On+FDA+Zicam+Issues/4748970.html">launching an informal inquiry</a>. The SEC is requesting documents and other information regarding the warning letter issued to Matrixx by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.</p>
<p>Last week, the FDA told consumers to stop using certain nasally administered Zicam products after the agency received more than 130 complaints from users who <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/closing-bell-sentiment-shifts-to-show-me-amgn-bby-mtxx-n/">lost their sense of smell</a>. Matrixx has defended its homeopathic, over-the-counter offerings, calling the safety concerns "erroneous," but the firm settled hundreds of lawsuits in 2006 with consumers making the same allegations.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/23/matrixx-initiatives-plummets-to-11-year-low-on-sec-inquiry/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Matrixx Initiatives plummets to 11-year low on SEC inquiry</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/23/matrixx-initiatives-plummets-to-11-year-low-on-sec-inquiry/">Matrixx Initiatives plummets to 11-year low on SEC inquiry</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/23/matrixx-initiatives-plummets-to-11-year-low-on-sec-inquiry/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19075330/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/23/matrixx-initiatives-plummets-to-11-year-low-on-sec-inquiry/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>FDA</category><category>Food and Drug Administration</category><category>FoodAndDrugAdministration</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Matrixx Initiatives</category><category>MatrixxInitiatives</category><category>MTXX</category><category>options</category><category>SEC</category><category>Securities and Exchange Commission</category><category>SecuritiesAndExchangeCommission</category><category>Zicam</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[It takes a village to pull off a $50 billion investment scam]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/14/it-takes-a-village-to-pull-off-a-50-billion-investment-scam/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/14/it-takes-a-village-to-pull-off-a-50-billion-investment-scam/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/14/it-takes-a-village-to-pull-off-a-50-billion-investment-scam/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><div id="imageResults" style="DISPLAY: block"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/seclogo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />To paraphrase our next Secretary of State, it takes a village to keep an investment scam going. It takes an <strong>entrepreneur </strong>who's<strong> </strong>hungry, amoral, and clever; <strong>investors</strong> eager to believe that what's too good to be true is real; <strong>auditors</strong> who get paid not to audit; <strong>politicians</strong> who take money to keep regulation away; and <strong>regulators</strong> who do what the politicians tell them to do. </div>
<p>All these factors were in play with the $50 billion Madoff Securities scandal. As <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/13/50-billion-investment-fraud-could-you-be-next/">I posted</a>, Bernie Madoff was able to scam investors by creating false financial statements and using a tiny, unknown auditor to persuade investors hungry for membership in his club that they could get regular 10% annual returns in any market.</p>
<p>But Madoff's scam also benefited from a hands-off policy towards Wall Street thanks to help from politicians such as Chuck Schumer (D-NY) who raised millions from Wall Street to do its bidding. As head of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee between 2004 and 2008, he raised <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/14/business/14schumer.html?hp">$240 million</a> while increasing donations from Wall Street by 50%. In return Wall Street got free-market, deregulatory policies that helped them cook up the scandals that have helped wipe out $30 trillion in global stock market value in the last year.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/14/it-takes-a-village-to-pull-off-a-50-billion-investment-scam/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>It takes a village to pull off a $50 billion investment scam</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/14/it-takes-a-village-to-pull-off-a-50-billion-investment-scam/">It takes a village to pull off a $50 billion investment scam</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 14 Dec 2008 09:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/14/it-takes-a-village-to-pull-off-a-50-billion-investment-scam/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1400645/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/14/it-takes-a-village-to-pull-off-a-50-billion-investment-scam/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>charles schumer</category><category>inthenews</category><category>madoff</category><category>madoffsecurities</category><category>securitiesandexchangecommission</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 09:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Banking stupidity, then and now]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/bank-stupidity-then-and-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/bank-stupidity-then-and-now/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/bank-stupidity-then-and-now/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wm/" rel="tag">Washington Mutual (WM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/housing.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Eighteen months ago, banks were throwing money around with very little discretion. Now we find that they made a lot of bad loans, took extreme risk and jeopardized the global economy and the well being of hundreds of millions of people.</p>
<p>All this was supported by a simple minded president, corrupt Congress and an over-confident, short sighted investment community maneuvering in and around a sleeping Securities and Exchange Commission.</p>
<p>Having invested in a broad range of real estate assets (as well as stocks), I am feeling the pain like most everyone else. Reduced values, tighter liquidity, and uncertainty rule the market place.</p>
<p>What has me steamed currently is that I think <em>there is more capital in the marketplace than courage!</em> The lack of courage along with a shortage of leadership and wisdom continues to exacerbate a bad situation. I am probably better off than many people having been able to close two loans in the past month. It was not easy. However, after dealing with many financial institutions that are now doing a better job in the review process, I see that they have swung too far to the conservative side.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/bank-stupidity-then-and-now/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Banking stupidity, then and now</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/bank-stupidity-then-and-now/">Banking stupidity, then and now</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/bank-stupidity-then-and-now/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1376231/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/19/bank-stupidity-then-and-now/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking</category><category>featured</category><category>JPM</category><category>lending practices</category><category>LendingPractices</category><category>SEC</category><category>securitiesandexchangecommission</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>WM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[SEC wrings NEC's neck]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/sec-wrings-necs-neck/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/sec-wrings-necs-neck/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/sec-wrings-necs-neck/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/japan/" rel="tag">Japan</a></p>If you have an ADR for Japanese electronics giant NEC, save it as a collectible. In light of the SEC's recent decision to <a href="http://www.cfo.com/article.cfm/11579162">revoke NEC's securities registration</a> in the U.S., there will not be any more of those ADRs. NEC ran afoul of U.S. listing requirements when it failed to file annual reports for 2006 and 2007, and improperly booked revenues for 2000-2006. NEC was also the victim of internal fraud when at least 10 emplyees, over a period of several years, booked millions of dollars worth of fraudulent transactions. NEC had no procedures in place to authenticate or track these transactions. <br /><br />To be fair to NEC, recognizing software sales revenue up front in complicated under GAAP SOP 97-2, particularly when the software is sold as part of a service package that also includes hardware and/or software maintenance. But NEC was responsible for taking steps to see it was not being robbed blind from within. NEC was delisted from active trading on Nasdaq in November 2007. NEC neither accepted nor disputed the SEC decision. The company has also been under investigation by the Tokyo Regional Taxation Bureau. NEC states it has constructed sufficient internal controls to cut back on the potential for internal fraud. Too little, too late. The stock now trades on the pink sheets.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/sec-wrings-necs-neck/">SEC wrings NEC's neck</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cfo.com/article.cfm/11579162>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/sec-wrings-necs-neck/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1237084/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/26/sec-wrings-necs-neck/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>delisting</category><category>fraud</category><category>inthenews</category><category>NEC</category><category>SEC</category><category>Securities and Exchange Commission</category><category>SecuritiesAndExchangeCommission</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Victoria Erhart]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why should investors lose a voice in who runs their companies?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/04/why-should-investors-lose-a-stake-in-who-runs-their-companies/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/04/why-should-investors-lose-a-stake-in-who-runs-their-companies/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/04/why-should-investors-lose-a-stake-in-who-runs-their-companies/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p>Last week, I wrote <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/bad-idea-new-sec-rule-threatens-chairman-coxs-legacy/">about</a> the SEC's horrible new rule making it easier for companies to keep outside candidates for director off the ballot.<br /><br />But after Gary Weiss <a href="http://garyweiss.blogspot.com/2007/12/chris-cox-succumbs-on-shareholder.html">chastised</a> SEC Chairman Chris Cox and the media for not paying attention, I had to return to the topic. Weiss's comments are right on:<br /><em><br />... the media has been comparatively silent over the SEC's capitulation to corporate lobbyists, such as the Business Roundtable and U.S. Chamber of Commerce ... Chris Cox, very much a "politician" as Gretchen points out, is blowing with the wind -- which is an utter indifference to investor rights in the Bush administration.</em><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/04/why-should-investors-lose-a-stake-in-who-runs-their-companies/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Why should investors lose a voice in who runs their companies?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/04/why-should-investors-lose-a-stake-in-who-runs-their-companies/">Why should investors lose a voice in who runs their companies?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 04 Dec 2007 18:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/02/business/02gret.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/04/why-should-investors-lose-a-stake-in-who-runs-their-companies/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1054078/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/04/why-should-investors-lose-a-stake-in-who-runs-their-companies/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>boards</category><category>Governance</category><category>SEC</category><category>Securities and Exchange Commission</category><category>SecuritiesAndExchangeCommission</category><category>shareholders</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 18:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Option update 10-18-07: Bank of America volatility up on earnings miss]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/18/option-update-10-18-07-bank-of-america-volatility-up-on-earning/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/18/option-update-10-18-07-bank-of-america-volatility-up-on-earning/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/18/option-update-10-18-07-bank-of-america-volatility-up-on-earning/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cfc/" rel="tag">Countrywide Financial (CFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys"><img align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" /><strong>Bank of America</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>) volatility at 23 into 3Q net income decline of 32% to $3.7 billion. BAC is recently trading at $48.46 in pre-open trading, below Wednesday's close of $50.03. BAC reported Q3 EPS of 82 cents vs. consensus estimates of $1.05. BAC November option implied volatility of 23 is near 26-week average of 21 according to Track Data, suggesting non-directional risk. </p>
<p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/countrywide-financial-corporation/cfc/nys">Countrywide</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/countrywide-financial-corporation/cfc/nys">CFC</a>), a U.S. home mortgage lender, closed Wednesday at $17.35. <em>The Wall Street Journal </em>says "The Securities and Exchange Commission has opened an informal investigation into stock sales by CFC's CEO, according to people familiar with the matter." CFC Chairman, CEO &amp; founder is Angelo Mozilo. CFC is expected to report EPS on 10/26. CFC November option implied volatility of 74 is above its 26-week average of 59 according to Track Data, suggesting larger risk.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas"><strong>Apple</strong></a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) is recently down $1.24 to $171.51 in pre-open trading. AAPL will report Q4 EPS on October 22. AAPL November option implied volatility of 54 is above its 26-week average of 43 according to Track Data, suggesting larger price movement. </p>
<p><em>Daily options Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com.<br /></em></p>
<p><a href="http://money.aol.com/news/earnings"><strong>Visit AOL Money &amp; Finance for more </strong></a><strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/news/earnings">earnings</a></strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/news/earnings"><strong> coverage</strong></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/18/option-update-10-18-07-bank-of-america-volatility-up-on-earning/">Option update 10-18-07: Bank of America volatility up on earnings miss</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 18 Oct 2007 08:19:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/18/option-update-10-18-07-bank-of-america-volatility-up-on-earning/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1016163/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/18/option-update-10-18-07-bank-of-america-volatility-up-on-earning/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BAC</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>BankOfAmerica</category><category>CFC</category><category>Countrywide Financial</category><category>CountrywideFinancial</category><category>net income decline</category><category>NetIncomeDecline</category><category>option implied volatility</category><category>OptionImpliedVolatility</category><category>Securities and Exchange Commission</category><category>SecuritiesAndExchangeCommission</category><category>U.S. home mortgage lender,</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 08:19:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Feds to investigate Dow Jones insider trading]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/08/feds-to-investigate-dow-jones-insider-trading/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/08/feds-to-investigate-dow-jones-insider-trading/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/08/feds-to-investigate-dow-jones-insider-trading/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/insiders/" rel="tag">Insiders</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dj/" rel="tag">Dow Jones and Co (DJ)</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/insidertrading050707.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Last week one of our bloggers, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/bloggers/kevin-kersten/">Kevin Kersten</a>, noticed something a little <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/01/3-4m-of-insider-trading-on-dow-jones-calls/">strange about call options on Dow Jones</a>. Mr. Kersten did a little research and noticed that there was some pretty intense buying of Dow Jones on the day before <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corp</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>) announced it had made a bid to buy <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dow-jones-and-company-inc/dj/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Dow Jones &amp; Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dow-jones-and-company-inc/dj/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">DJ</a>). Well, it looks like Mr. Kersten was not the only one doing his homework as news has come out that federal and state authorities are <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/feds-probing-dow-jones-options-trading/n20070507152309990022?cid=403">investigating suspicious options trading</a>.<br /><br />Dow Jones announced yesterday that it had been sent a subpoena from the New York attorney general's office and also a request from the <a href="http://www.sec.gov/" target="_blank">Securities and Exchange Commission</a> regarding options trading. This comes after news last week that the other company involved, News Corp., had received a subpoena from Cuomo's office and an inquiry from the SEC.<br /><br />As <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/bloggers/douglas-mcintyre/">Douglas McIntyre</a> pointed out yesterday, the possible deal between the two companies now <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/07/dow-jones-deal-rip/">appears to be falling apart</a>, but on the day of the deal announcement buyers flocked into Dow Jones and pushed shares up over 54%. Shareholders of the stock had to feel pretty good about their investments on that day, but not nearly as good as the lucky ones that actually owned call options on the stock. These investors made a killing on that day, but as Mr. Kersten pointed out, questions were immediately swirling around insider trading information.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/08/feds-to-investigate-dow-jones-insider-trading/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Feds to investigate Dow Jones insider trading</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/08/feds-to-investigate-dow-jones-insider-trading/">Feds to investigate Dow Jones insider trading</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 08 May 2007 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/08/feds-to-investigate-dow-jones-insider-trading/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/890888/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/08/feds-to-investigate-dow-jones-insider-trading/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>insider trading</category><category>InsiderTrading</category><category>Securities and Exchange Commission</category><category>SecuritiesAndExchangeCommission</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
