<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[JockStocks: Should the NFL Receive Antitrust Exemption?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/jockstocks-should-the-nfl-receive-antitrust-exemption/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/jockstocks-should-the-nfl-receive-antitrust-exemption/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/jockstocks-should-the-nfl-receive-antitrust-exemption/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/giants-patriots.jpg" alt="" />I was checking out one of my favorite blogs yesterday (<a target="_blank" href="http://uniwatchblog.com">UniWatchBlog.com</a> - operated by the obsessive Paul Lukas) and I found myself with a subject for this week's JockStocks. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.uniwatchblog.com/2010/01/14/nfls-latest-idea-psls-for-supreme-court-hearings/">Is the NFL a monopoly</a>? Should the league be exempt from the Sherman Antitrust Act? </p>
<p>This all stems from a suit by a company known as American Needle, <a target="_blank" href="http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/07/antitrust-case-has-implications-far-beyond-nfl/?scp=2&amp;sq=american%20needle&amp;st=cse">which sued the NFL in 2000</a> when the league selected Reebok to be the exclusive provider of licensed NFL apparel. American Needle sued the NFL, stating that the Reebok deal violated antitrust statutes becasue the league and Reebok "conspired to stifle competition and inflate prices." </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/jockstocks-should-the-nfl-receive-antitrust-exemption/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>JockStocks: Should the NFL Receive Antitrust Exemption?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/jockstocks-should-the-nfl-receive-antitrust-exemption/">JockStocks: Should the NFL Receive Antitrust Exemption?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/jockstocks-should-the-nfl-receive-antitrust-exemption/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19318336/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/jockstocks-should-the-nfl-receive-antitrust-exemption/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>American Needle</category><category>antitrust</category><category>antitrust exemption</category><category>antitrust law</category><category>antitrust lawsuit</category><category>featured</category><category>monopoly</category><category>NFL</category><category>Reebok</category><category>Sherman Anti-Trust Act</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Companies that vanished: Standard Oil -- one giant becomes three]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/companies-that-vanished-standard-oil-one-giant-becomes-three/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/companies-that-vanished-standard-oil-one-giant-becomes-three/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/companies-that-vanished-standard-oil-one-giant-becomes-three/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvx/" rel="tag">Chevron Corp (CVX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cop/" rel="tag">ConocoPhillips (COP)</a></p><p><em><img  hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/standard-oil-pieces-200a060308.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />This post is part of a series on some of the most memorable <a href="http://money.aol.com/special/companies-that-have-vanished">companies that have disappeared</a>.</em></p>
<p>Standard Oil (1870 - 1911) was the dominant oil company in the world until it was felled by the Sherman Anti-Trust Act of 1890. John D. Rockefeller was a business genius of the first order. He used his control over train routes and refineries to buy up oil wells and block competitors from taking market share.</p>
<p>Thanks to journalist Ida Tarbell, Rockefeller's rough business tactics got plenty of publicity. In 1911, the Supreme Court ruled that Standard Oil had violated the Sherman Anti-Trust Act through its tactics of using low prices to wipe out competitors. The result, as chronicled in one of my favorite books, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Titan-Life-John-Rockefeller-Sr/dp/0679438084">Ron Chernow's <em>Titan</em></a>, was a breakup of the company into what is now <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/chevron-corporation/cvx/nys">Chevron</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/chevron-corporation/cvx/nys">CVX</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/exxon-mobil-corporation/xom/nys">Exxon Mobil</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/exxon-mobil-corporation/xom/nys">XOM</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/conocophillips/cop/nys">ConocoPhillips</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/conocophillips/cop/nys">COP</a>). </p>
<p>The lesson: What didn't kill Standard Oil made its offspring stronger.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em><font color="#0072bc">Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</font></em></a><em>.</em><em> He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em><font color="#0072bc">teaches management at Babson College</font></em></a><em> and edits </em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em><font color="#0072bc">The Cohan Letter</font></em></a><em>. </em></p>
<em>
<p><em>Let us know in the comments what you miss about Standard Oil. And be sure to check out other <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/companies-that-have-vanished">Companies That Have Vanished</a></strong>.</em></p>
</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/companies-that-vanished-standard-oil-one-giant-becomes-three/">Companies that vanished: Standard Oil -- one giant becomes three</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 09 Jun 2008 12:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/companies-that-vanished-standard-oil-one-giant-becomes-three/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1211719/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/companies-that-vanished-standard-oil-one-giant-becomes-three/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Chevron</category><category>ConocoPhillips</category><category>COP</category><category>CVX</category><category>Exxon</category><category>Exxon Mobil</category><category>Ida Tarbell</category><category>John D. Rockafeller</category><category>Ron Chernow</category><category>Sherman Anti-Trust Act</category><category>Standard Oil</category><category>Titan</category><category>XOM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 12:50:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
