<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Sherwood Investments' flipflop on Trans World]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/13/sherwood-investments-flipflop-on-trans-world/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/13/sherwood-investments-flipflop-on-trans-world/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/13/sherwood-investments-flipflop-on-trans-world/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="For Your Entertainment logo " src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/fye-for-your-entertainment-logo.jpg" />Tuesday I wrote about Sherwood Investments' 13-D filing (the first in the firm's history) indicating a 5.48% stake in <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/trans-world-entertainment-corporation/twmc/nas">Trans World Entertainment</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/trans-world-entertainment-corporation/twmc/nas">TWMC</a>), the owner of mall-based music and entertainment stores including f.y.e., Suncoast, and Sam Goody.<br /><br />Obviously this lends a good deal of credibility to Sherwood's offer, but there are still a few things that investors need to wonder about.<br /><br />The first, and most important question, is how many contingencies does the offer contain. If the offer is loaded with hedges and outs for Sherwood, it's a lot easier to dismiss it as blustering. If Sherwood's offer is contingent on the ability to secure financing and the Kansas City Royals winning the World Series, it's pretty easy to dismiss. How many contingencies does the offer have? It's hard to say because <a href="http://sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/795212/000095014407010994/g11005sc13d.htm">in the the 13-D filing</a>, Sherwood actually contradicts itself: <br /><em><br />On November 29, 2007, Sherwood sent a letter to the Issuer and the Special Committee, in which it made a preliminary proposal to acquire all of the Issuer's Common Stock not owned by Sherwood for $7.00 per share, subject to a due diligence review and complete and fair evaluation of the Issuer's business. A copy of that letter is attached hereto as Exhibit C.</em><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/13/sherwood-investments-flipflop-on-trans-world/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Sherwood Investments' flipflop on Trans World</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/13/sherwood-investments-flipflop-on-trans-world/">Sherwood Investments' flipflop on Trans World</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 13 Dec 2007 08:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/795212/000095014407010994/g11005sc13d.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/13/sherwood-investments-flipflop-on-trans-world/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1061510/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/13/sherwood-investments-flipflop-on-trans-world/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>f.y.e.</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Sam Goody</category><category>SamGoody</category><category>Sherwood Investments</category><category>SherwoodInvestments</category><category>Suncoast</category><category>Trans World</category><category>TransWorld</category><category>TWMC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 08:38:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Trans World Entertainment Update: Is Sherwood serious?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/30/trans-world-entertainment-update-is-sherwood-serious/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/30/trans-world-entertainment-update-is-sherwood-serious/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/30/trans-world-entertainment-update-is-sherwood-serious/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a></p>Not too long ago I <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/30/is-sherwood-investments-tossing-trans-world-shareholders-an-air/">wondered</a> about Sherwood Investments' $7 per share bid for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/trans-world-entertainment-corporation/twmc/nas">Trans World Entertainment</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/trans-world-entertainment-corporation/twmc/nas">TWMC</a>). I questioned whether Sherwood was serious about its offer, but added that Julian Benscher, the man who signed the company's press releases, told me by phone that the offer was serious.<br /><br />After that post was published, Benscher called me back and explained that the reason he had not acquired 5% of the company and filed a 13-D yet was that Sherwood's securities lawyer is currently traveling.<br /><br />In addition, he said that his reason for stating in the press release announcing the offer that Sherwood would possibly raise its offer was that in a prior PR on TWMC, he has said he believed the company's value was higher: "We are highly confident that an auction of the company would result in a sale in excess of $8 per share, a considerable premium to your current proposal."<br /><br />I'll believe that Sherwood's $7 per share offer is serious when a deal is consummated. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gs/nys">GS</a>) has been shopping the company for months, it's hard to imagine another bidder emerging with a higher offer.<br /><br />But until then, I think investors should take Sherwood's offer with a bucket of salt.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/30/trans-world-entertainment-update-is-sherwood-serious/">Trans World Entertainment Update: Is Sherwood serious?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/30/trans-world-entertainment-update-is-sherwood-serious/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1052158/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/30/trans-world-entertainment-update-is-sherwood-serious/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>sherwood investments</category><category>SherwoodInvestments</category><category>transworld entertainment</category><category>TransworldEntertainment</category><category>twmc</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:31:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
