<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Amazon.com: A software company, too]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/15/amazon-com-a-software-company-too/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/15/amazon-com-a-software-company-too/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/15/amazon-com-a-software-company-too/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/orcl/" rel="tag">Oracle Corp (ORCL)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/amzn.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />In the database world, the clear winner is <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/orcl/nas">Oracle</a> (NASDAQ: ORCL). But there are other big competitors, such as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM</a>), and upstarts like MySQL.</p>
<p>But what about <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amzn/nas">Amazon.com</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amzn/nas">AMZN</a>)? Keep in mind that -- over the years -- the company has built lots of proprietary database systems to manage enormous transaction volumes.</p>
<p>Well, now Amazon.com has its own <a href="http://www.news.com/8301-13580_3-9834061-39.html">database offering</a>, which is called SimpleDB. As the name implies, it's not going to be a threat to Oracle (which is focused on big-time customers). Yet, it's still important.</p>
<p>After all, why should a smaller company spend lots of money for racks of servers? Might as well outsource this stuff to a solid player like Amazon.com, right?</p>
<p>But, with SimpleDB, Amazon.com is making a big jump, allowing its customers to essentially build robust applications. <br /><br />Funny enough, these may ultimately complete against Amazon.com services. Even if so, at least Amazon will get a fee.</p>
<p><em>Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including</em> <a href=" http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0761535616?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=mergerforum0f-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0761535616">The Complete M&amp;A Handbook</a><em><img style="MARGIN: 0px; BORDER-TOP-STYLE: none! important; BORDER-RIGHT-STYLE: none! important; BORDER-LEFT-STYLE: none! important; BORDER-BOTTOM-STYLE: none! important" height="1" alt="" src=" http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=mergerforum0f-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0761535616" width="1" border="0" /> and</em> <a href=" http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1932159282?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=mergerforum0f-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=1932159282">The Edgar Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements</a><em><img style="MARGIN: 0px; BORDER-TOP-STYLE: none! important; BORDER-RIGHT-STYLE: none! important; BORDER-LEFT-STYLE: none! important; BORDER-BOTTOM-STYLE: none! important" height="1" alt="" src=" http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=mergerforum0f-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=1932159282" width="1" border="0" />. He also operates </em><a href="http://www.dealprofiles.com"><em>DealProfiles.com</em></a><em>.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/15/amazon-com-a-software-company-too/">Amazon.com: A software company, too</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 15 Dec 2007 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/15/amazon-com-a-software-company-too/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1063435/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/15/amazon-com-a-software-company-too/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Amazon</category><category>Amazon.com</category><category>On-Demand Software</category><category>SimpleDB</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
