• BHP Billiton (BHP), the world's number one miner, had earnings before interest and taxes of $14.82 billion. Of that amount, iron ore accounted for $5.8 billion, up 177%
• Number three miner, Rio Tinto (RTPPF), had earnings of $26.6 billion. Iron ore unit accounted for 60%, or $16.6 billion, up 133% for the year.

The Korea Composite Stock Price Index, or the KOSPI, which has been approaching its 52-week high of 1,976.46, moved closer to the 52-week high during the Tuesday trading session in Seoul.

Just after the market opened, the index of Korean stocks dipped before climbing higher. The index began to fall again, nearly reaching the previous day's closing level of 1,953.64 before climbing higher for the remainder of the day. The KOSPI ended Tuesday up 8.88 points, or 0.45%, at 1,962.52.

Apple (AAPL) continues to bring the iPhone to countries outside the U.S. Although its launch in China didn't generate as much fanfare as the company had hoped, things take time to roll into a big ball of success. Apple won't be slowing down international introductions of the handset that changed the wireless game, that's for sure.

As such, South Korea's own LG Electronics and Samsung Electronics are about to see their homeland assaulted by the official introduction of the iPhone for sale into that country. South Korea's KT Corp. and SK Telecom are the reported carriers for Apple's iPhone there, and although the South Korean market may seem like a small potato of opportunity for Apple, the company has been cleared by the Korean Communications Commission to start selling its popular handset.

Consumer confidence ticked upward for the first time since 2007. Around the world, consumers are becoming more comfortable with the prospect of shelling out some cash, even if they're still approaching the notion with caution.

According to a survey conducted by The Nielsen Company between September 28 and October 16, 2009, consumer confidence was highest in India, with Indonesia and Norway following. Japan, Latvia, Portugal, and South Korea were at the other end of the spectrum, though South Korea did show a significant quarterly improvement.

Its sights set on the United States and Asia, South Korea's $30 billion sovereign wealth fund is hunting for equities. Korea Investment Corp. (KIC) doesn't see bonds outperforming stocks over the long term, which is what has prompted the move.

Once the reallocation is executed, equities will account for half of KIC's "traditional" investments. Today, it stands at 40%. High quality equities and fixed income securities comprise 90% of KIC's portfolio, with the rest, one would gather, consisting of "non-traditional" investments.

"While watching the Olympics, I couldn't thinking about the investment opportunities of the various countries participating in the games," says exchange-traded fund expert Carl Delfeld.

Recognizing that this is not a "scientific" approach nor a primary basis for seriously determining one's asset allocation the editor of Around the World with ETFs speculates, "While it is admittedly a stretch, let's consider what an ETF porfolio of the top ten countries in the Beijing Olympics medal count would look like."

"I hope that while watching the Olympic games many investors were also reminded at how the world is changing and why they need a global portfolio to capture value and growth around the world.

"The U.S. did remarkably well across the board underscoring its role as the world's leading investment destination. China surged to win the most gold and reach the symbolic level of 100 medals.

"Quite an achievement that punctuates China's growing heft. With the Shanghai Composite down 55% this year, it has come down to earth and is interesting from a valuation perspective.

"Next comes Russia with a performance fueled by a strong Olympian tradition and petro dollars but perhaps a bit overshadowed by the Georgian fiasco. I will take a pass on this one even though it is off 36% since just May.

It has been widely anticipated that the EU would bring new antitrust charges against Intel (NASDAQ: INTC). The FTC and other US authorities are chasing the largest chip company in the world for similar reasons. South Korea has already fined Intel for anti-competitive behavior.

The theory behind the charges is that Intel induced PC companies and their retailers to use its chips and not those from rival AMD (NYSE: AMD). According to The Wall Street Journal, "The European Union launched new antitrust charges against Intel Corp., saying the chip giant paid rebates to a major retailer to encourage it not to carry computers using chips from smaller rival Advanced Micro Devices Inc ."

If the charges are true, it shows the extent to which a company of real size, like Intel, can be its own worst enemy. Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) ran into similar problems a decade ago for being too aggressive killing off competition in the browser and media player markets.

The irony of Intel's legal bind is that it almost certainly did not need to pressure or give incentives to keep AMD in a distant second place. It had the balance sheet to keep margin pressure on AMD and the engineering prowess to offer better chips.

Arrogance and carelessness often go with being in first place. This time it appears that it has caught up to Intel.

Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.

The U.S. government made the decision to offer tax rebates to help offset the economic slump. Based on recent unemployment figures, that may not be working.

Rising commodities and oil prices may be a more significant threat to consumers than the very modest growth in personal income.

That begs the issue of whether the U.S. is putting capital distributed to tax-payers in the right place. It may be that giving consumers subsidies to offset oil and gas prices is a much more effective way to keep the economy on track. And, that is what South Korea plans to do.

According to Bloomberg, the government in South Korea will put up about $10 billion "to help consumers and businesses cope with surging energy costs." These benefits will go mostly to those with modest incomes and small companies. Arguably, the rich and large corporations are better able to cope with high energy costs.

Estimates vary, but the U.S. economy is 10 to 15 times larger than South Korea's, so any similar program in the U.S. could cost $120 billion.

Not a ton of money to keep the skids greased.

Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.

Many South Koreans made their feelings clear on Saturday: the United States can keep its beef.

The AP reported that a month of protests culminated in a rally Saturday night in Seoul during which many thousands of South Koreans protested the government's decision to import U.S. beef after a it had been shut out for most of the past four and half years.

South Korea was formerly the third-largest overseas market for U.S. beef, until the first case of mad cow disease in the United States back in 2003.

After sensational media reports sparked fears of mad cow disease, protests of the April agreement to reopen markets to U.S. beef began in earnest. Students, labor union members, and office workers filled the plaza in front of city hall. Protesters lit candles, waved placards and chanted slogans criticizing President Lee Myung-bak, but rally was largely peaceful.

Protesters suggest that President Lee was too quick to concede to U.S. demands in order to win favor with Washington and garner support in Congress for ratification of a separate free trade agreement.

President Lee's office had no comment on the rally, but earlier. President Lee went on national television to apologize for not sufficiently consulting with the public on the beef issue.

General Motors Corp. (NYSE: GM) wants to capture more market share for its imported passenger cars in South Korea. To do this, the automaker is considering launching its Chevrolet brand in that country after examining the results of a recent Korea-specific feasibility study.

GM, which already sells its Cadillac and Saab brands in South Korea, wants to make sure that rival Toyota Motor Corp. (NYSE: TM) doesn't get into South Korea with its extremely popular passenger cars and beat it in that market, much like it's doing in many national auto markets. Toyota is now public enemy number one for GM, and it's not getting any easier for the iconic U.S. auto brand. Although its latest quarter was somewhat disappointing, Toyota is still very much on top of its game.

Another motivation for GM is the fact that imported car sales in South Korea increased to 6.2% of all car sales in April of this year, up from 4.9% from a year ago. GM hopes that it can double its South Korea sales this year, which sounds like a pretty hefty goal. GM is facing some headwinds though: the big three Detroit automakers saw their first-quarter car sales in South Korea shrink to 11.7% of the market, down from 2004's 15% first quarter total.

You know that an economic issue has jumped the shark when the New York Times's op-editoraliste Maureen Dowd (MoDo) devotes her Sunday column to it. What's unleashed MoDo's moxie is how Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs) -- those government investment funds estimated to control between $2 trillion and $15 trillion -- are buying up chunks of the U.S. banking system.

The problem against which MoDo rails is that thanks to the policies of George W. Bush, the price of oil has quadrupled and the dollar has plummeted -- thus putting the U.S. at the mercy of those Arabian SWFs whose owners he groveled to this week to lower the price of oil. And while W. was grovelling, so were the CEOs of Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C) and Merrill Lynch & Co. (NYSE: MER) -- seeking capital to shore up their Collateralized Debt Obligation (CDO)-tarnished balance sheets. MoDo is right that with Bush's $2.4 trillion worth of wars and $1.3 trillion worth of tax cuts, the U.S. has gone from being the world's creditor to its debtor.

But another New York Times article sheds more light on the phenomenon of foreign investment in the U.S. -- suggesting that with their $414 billion worth of 2007 purchases in the U.S., foreign investors, including SWFs, spent a record amount of money buying up the U.S. last year -- up 90% from 2006. The Times suggests that this foreign investment comes in different forms -- some of which are beneficial. How so?