<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Biotech stock #4: Curis (CRIS)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/12/biotech-stock-4-curis-cris/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/12/biotech-stock-4-curis-cris/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/12/biotech-stock-4-curis-cris/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/curis-incorporated/cris/nas"><img  height="200" alt="biotech stocks" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/07/curis.jpg" width="150" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Curis</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/curis-incorporated/cris/nas">CRIS</a>) is a speculative stock -- no approved product and no revenue -- that, in former markets, would sell for $10 - $12. It is now around a buck and a half, after doubling in the past few months.</p>
<p>CRIS focuses on cancer treatments, and is partnered with Genentech/Roche. It has a new therapy for basal cell carcinoma in mid-stage trials. The results appear very promising. In fact, they are so promising that Genentech is treating this as the last trial needed before seeking FDA approval.</p>
<p>This stock is a potential 10- to 20-bagger with an FDA approval in 2011 or so. And the company is on the verge of licensing a new molecule that could be a big catalyst for the stock in the short term.</p>
<p>Your best strategy for life-changing profits?</p>
<p>Buy CRIS now. (In the interest of full disclosure, I own a lot of CRIS.)</p>
<p><strong>Next: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/12/biotech-stock-5-cerus-corp-cers/">Biotech Stock #5</a></strong></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/12/biotech-stock-4-curis-cris/">Biotech stock #4: Curis (CRIS)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 12 Jul 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/12/biotech-stock-4-curis-cris/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19094476/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/12/biotech-stock-4-curis-cris/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cris</category><category>curis</category><category>genentech</category><category>michael shulman</category><category>MichaelShulman</category><category>speculative stocks</category><category>SpeculativeStocks</category><category>stocks to buy</category><category>StocksToBuy</category><category>top stocks</category><category>TopStocks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chasing Value: Is Ford worth the risk? ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/chasing-value-is-ford-worth-the-risk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/chasing-value-is-ford-worth-the-risk/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/chasing-value-is-ford-worth-the-risk/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/" rel="tag">Chasing Value[TM]</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/f-ford-logo.jpg" />The latest edition of <a href="http://www.motortrend.com/index.html">Motor Trend</a> magazine this month notes that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford Motor Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>) decided not to take the governments money because the family would have had to forego much of its income under the terms of the plan until they can turn the company around and pay back the loans.<br /><br />They do not want to do that, and although they lost almost $3 billion in the most recent quarter, they are going to try and tough it out. The mags monthly notes comment that Ford is in better shape than <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) or Chrysler which did take bail out money having about $19 billion of liquidity remaining.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/chasing-value-is-ford-worth-the-risk/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chasing Value: Is Ford worth the risk? </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/chasing-value-is-ford-worth-the-risk/">Chasing Value: Is Ford worth the risk? </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/chasing-value-is-ford-worth-the-risk/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1447732/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/chasing-value-is-ford-worth-the-risk/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto industry</category><category>AutoIndustry</category><category>Chasing Value</category><category>ChasingValue</category><category>Chrysler</category><category>dividends</category><category>F</category><category>featured</category><category>Ford</category><category>GM</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>speculative stocks</category><category>SpeculativeStocks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Speculative flyers: Delta (DAL) and US Airways (LCC)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/05/speculative-flyers-delta-dal-and-us-airways-lcc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/05/speculative-flyers-delta-dal-and-us-airways-lcc/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/05/speculative-flyers-delta-dal-and-us-airways-lcc/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lcc/" rel="tag">US Airways Group (LCC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dal/" rel="tag">Delta Air Lines (DAL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p>"If there's one sector that stands to benefit handsomely from a further slide in oil or, at least, a moderation in crude's rally: the airlines," explains energy sector expert <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=2240">Elliott Gue</a>.</p>
<p>In <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=2240">The Energy Strategist</a>, he says, "Airlines may make a terrible long-term investment but can be an outstanding short-term trade." Here he looks at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/delta-air-lines-inc-del/dal/nys">Delta Air Lines</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/delta-air-lines-inc-del/dal/nys">DAL</a>) and, for the even more speculatively-inclined, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/us-airways-group-inc-new/lcc/nys">US Airways</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/us-airways-group-inc-new/lcc/nys">LCC</a>).</p>
<p>"Some investors will rightfully cringe from any mention of this sector; after all, the airlines have consistently lost money throughout their post-deregulation history. </p>
<p>"Most of the majors have declared bankruptcy on multiple occasions since that time. However, we've traded the airlines on a few occasions; we took some triple-digit percentage gains in the airlines back in 2005.  </p>
<p>"The airlines' leverage to oil prices is well known. Expectations are so low, in fact, that several major air carriers actually managed to beat consensus expectations in the second quarter. </p>
<p>"And although sentiment is already at rock-bottom, there's a real basis for cautious optimism. First, if I'm right about oil, fuel costs won't rise appreciably in the third quarter. This huge headwind is dissipating. <br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/05/speculative-flyers-delta-dal-and-us-airways-lcc/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Speculative flyers: Delta (DAL) and US Airways (LCC)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/05/speculative-flyers-delta-dal-and-us-airways-lcc/">Speculative flyers: Delta (DAL) and US Airways (LCC)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/05/speculative-flyers-delta-dal-and-us-airways-lcc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1275809/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/05/speculative-flyers-delta-dal-and-us-airways-lcc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>air stocks</category><category>airline stocks</category><category>AirlineStocks</category><category>dal</category><category>delta air lines</category><category>DeltaAirLines</category><category>elliott gue</category><category>ElliottGue</category><category>energy stocks</category><category>energy strategist</category><category>EnergyStocks</category><category>EnergyStrategist</category><category>lcc</category><category>oil stocks</category><category>speculative stocks</category><category>SpeculativeStocks</category><category>steve halpern</category><category>SteveHalpern</category><category>thestockadvisors.com</category><category>trading stocks</category><category>transportation stocks</category><category>travel stocks</category><category>TravelStocks</category><category>us airways</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Halpern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:30:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
