<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Best &amp; Worst in Money 2008: Most in need of a makeover]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-most-in-need-of-a-makeover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-most-in-need-of-a-makeover/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-most-in-need-of-a-makeover/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/shld/" rel="tag">Sears Holdings (SHLD)</a></p><p><em><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/best-worst-200x267-need-of-a-makeover.jpg" alt="" />This post is part of AOL Money &amp; Finance's <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/best-and-worst-2008">Best &amp; Worst in Money 2008</a></strong> feature.</em></p>
<p>As we undertake a hasty exit from the tumult of 2008 and plunge headlong into the mysteries of 2009, we might find it interesting to consider some business entities that could benefit from a little "freshening up." Four familiar names; Kmart, Playboy, Starbucks, and Wall Street, are each in need of a timely makeover, to varying degrees. But if you could chose just one of these big name operations to fix up for 2009, which one would it be, and how would you fix it?</p>
<p><iframe height="200" frameborder="0" align="right" width="205" src="http://webcenter.polls.aol.com/modular.jsp?template=1512&amp;view=157423&amp;pollId=157703&amp;channel=aol_us_personalfinance"></iframe>First let's consider Kmart, the adopted son of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sears-holdings-corporation/shld/nas">Sears Holdings Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sears-holdings-corporation/shld/nas">SHLD</a>). What are the changes that Kmart might need to remain competitive going into 2009? Should the company try playing the boutique angle, which failed to work for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">Wal-Mart Stores Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WMT</a>)? Should the company tighten up and consolidate, while pursuing a deeper product value play, or should it attempt to spread out its market coverage and work over its wholesale vendors, while engaging Wal-Mart in a game of cut-throat retail price points? If you were CEO of Kmart, what would you change?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-most-in-need-of-a-makeover/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Best &amp; Worst in Money 2008: Most in need of a makeover</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-most-in-need-of-a-makeover/">Best &amp; Worst in Money 2008: Most in need of a makeover</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-most-in-need-of-a-makeover/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1385236/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-most-in-need-of-a-makeover/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Best and Worst 2008</category><category>featured</category><category>Kmart</category><category>makeover</category><category>merchandising</category><category>playboy</category><category>playboy magazine</category><category>playboy tv</category><category>retail</category><category>Sears Holdings</category><category>Spice Channel</category><category>Starbucks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
