Standard and Poors posts
FeedPosted Oct 27th 2009 1:40PM by Tom Johansmeyer (RSS feed)
Filed under: Russia, Economic data, Recession, Financial Crisis
What happens when a bank has to accept the collateral posted for loans? Well, in Russia, it's like the punchline to a bad Yakov Smirnoff joke. "In Russia, when a bank takes collateral, it has to set up a pigpen!"
Well, this is exactly what happened to Alexander Lebedev's OAO National Reserve Bank. It wound up with 40,450 of them. As Russian banks are coping with the financial crisis, they are finding themselves with a variety of hard goods that they never expected to receive.
Continue reading Pigs and panties: Russian banks stuck with unexpected collateral
Posted Oct 2nd 2009 10:30AM by Mark Fightmaster (RSS feed)
Filed under: Pfizer (PFE), Indices, S and P 500

Late Thursday, Standard & Poor's announced a few changes to its U.S. indices. The reason for the changes are that
Wyeth (NYSE:
WYE) is being acquired by
Pfizer (NYSE:
PFE), leaving an opening in both the S&P 100 and S&P 500 (SPX). I want to focus on the stock that will
replace WYE in the SPX,
First Solar (NASDAQ:
FSLR). In after-hours trading, FSLR jumped more than 6% in response to the announcement.
FSLR manufactures solar modules and is a major benefactor of what I like to call the "green rush" that took place during the past two years. FSLR capitalized nicely on the global environmental consciousness revolution last year, ascending as high as the $310 region. Yes, the stock has backed off quite a bit due to the economic crisis, but it could enjoy a bit of a recovery provided it can parlay this latest news into a breach of some overhead resistance.
Continue reading First Solar to join the S&P 500 Index
Posted Aug 28th 2009 4:00PM by Jon Ogg (RSS feed)
Filed under: Dell (DELL), Intel (INTC)

Eight is enough ... of DJIA gains in days in a row, that is. There are many things that the market had going for it today, but sometimes good news can only propel a market for so many days ...
Here are today's unofficial closing bell levels:
Dow 9,532.11 -48.52 (-0.51%)
S&P 500 1,028.36 -2.62 (-0.25%)
Nasdaq 2,028.04 +0.31 (0.02%)
Top Analyst CallsTop Day Trader AlertsContinue reading Closing bell: Eight is enough ... really (DELL, INTC, MOS, SBUX, TRBN)
Posted Feb 26th 2009 9:30AM by Sam Collins (RSS feed)
Filed under: Technical Analysis, S and P 500, DJIA, NASDAQ

Since Obama's inauguration, the market seems to have responded negatively to the president's rhetoric, and yesterday was no exception. Within seconds of a White House alert that the president and his chief economic advisers would make an important announcement, stocks headed south.
And by the time that President Obama -- flanked by his team -- began the address at 3:50 p.m. Eastern, the Dow had given up more than 100 points, with investors fearful that the team had decided on a major policy shift.
Despite the poor timing of the White House's news conference, which contained little new information and spooked traders into a flurry of profit-taking, Wednesday's small correction did little to change Tuesday's upside reversal and the probability of further buying.
Continue reading Today's technical outlook: Obama's bad timing
Posted Dec 7th 2008 11:10AM by Zac Bissonnette (RSS feed)
Filed under: Bad news, Motorola (MOT)
Standard & Poor's has slashed Motorola Inc.'s (NYSE: MOT) credit rating to junk status, saying that continued operational challenges will lead to weak cash flows.
"Revenues and profits in the first part of the year will be challenged by a narrower, somewhat-dated product portfolio," S&P's Bruce Hyman said in a statement. "Standard & Poor's also expects about 10 percent fewer handsets to be sold worldwide in 2009 at lower average prices than in 2008."
On December 1, BloggingStocks' Doug McIntyre wrote that "As hard as it would have been to imagine a year ago, Motorola may still have to dump its cell operation and perhaps put it into Chapter 11. Its fate is that grim. It needs to escape its employee and creditor obligations to make it."
The company's November 2012 notes are trading at a yield of 8.02% -- hardly a sign of a company in severe distress.
But everything the company needs to do to turn itself around will be made more difficult by a weak credit rating in an environment where it's tough for company's with good credit ratings to secure access to capital.
But the one thing we can see from this is that Carl Icahn's complaint that the company was under-leveraged may not have been the case.
Posted Jun 16th 2008 2:09PM by Brent Archer (RSS feed)
Filed under: Bad news, McGraw-Hill Companies (MHP), Options, Technical Analysis
McGraw-Hill (NYSE:
MHP) shares opened lower today, but have rebounded as the day moved on after the European Union Internal Market Commissioner announced that bond and credit rating agencies, including MHP's Standard & Poor's, will
face mandatory new European Union regulation as a result of these agencies' roles in the U.S. sub-prime mortgage crisis. If you think this stock won't be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on MHP.
After hitting a one-year high of $71.97 last June, the stock hit a one-year low of $33.91 in March. This morning, MHP opened at $42.87. So far today the stock has hit a low of $42.10 and a high of $43.65. As of 12:00, MHP is trading at $43.60, down $0.13 (-0.3%). The chart for MHPlooks bullish and steady.
For a bearish hedged play on this stock, I would consider an August
bear-call credit spread above the $50 range. A bear-call credit spread is an options position that combines the purchase and sale of call options to hedge risk in case the stock doesn't do what you think but still leverage nice returns. This particular trade will make an 11.1% return in two months as long as MHP is below $50 at August expiration. McGraw-Hill would have to rise by more than 14% before we would start to lose money.
MHP hasn't been above $50 since October and has shown resistance around $45 recently. This trade could be risky if the company's earnings (due out in late-July) are a positive surprise, but even if that happens, this position could be protected by resistance MHP might find at its 200 day moving average, which is currently around $44 and falling.
Brent Archer is an options analyst and writer at Investors Observer. At publication time, Brent neither owns nor controls positions in MHP.Posted Jul 25th 2007 3:50PM by Sheldon Liber (RSS feed)
Filed under: Rumors, Consumer experience, Rants and raves, Competitive strategy, Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A), Market matters, Scandals, Johnson and Johnson (JNJ), United Parcel'B' (UPS)
Most investors probably think that when an investment ratings service like Moody's, Standard & Poors or Fitch gives a company, financial institution or security the highest rating of "AAA," it carries the least possible level of risk. Most investors would think that this rating would be reserved for United States Treasuries and only the most secure of companies like Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK.A), Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ), or United Parcel Service (NYSE: UPS). Actually, this happens to be the case, and these companies are among the very few to receive AAA ratings outside of financial institutions.
So what happened in the case of the Collateralized Debt Obligation (CDOs), where the ratings agencies determined that high-risk securities batched together had a smaller chance of default than the individual securities? Perhaps that is the case, but triple-A? Well, it seems to me that large investment banks knew they needed the AAA ratings to have a marketable security. They went to the ratings agencies that understood this and the agencies created the rational or plausible deniability to support the rating. This may be a bit harsh, but it does seem that the ratings agencies were working in reverse: first establish the rating and then the support for the rating. The ratings services are all heading for cover and many of the previously AAA-rated securities are being re-evaluated.
Continue reading Subprime = Triple-A ratings? or 'How to Lie with Statistics'
Posted Jan 26th 2007 2:55PM by Nick Perry (RSS feed)
Filed under: Earnings reports, Bad news, Magazines, Apple Inc (AAPL), Intel (INTC), Indices, International Business Machines (IBM), Advanced Micro Dev (AMD), Symantec Corp (SYMC)
Over the past few weeks I have seen a bit of skepticism showered on the technology sector. As was noted in a Bloggingstocks post
earlier this month, Jim Cramer offered some cautious comments on the group, saying that many stocks were "off limits". I then saw
this BusinessWeek article that says Standard & Poor's is calling for a potential 7% to 10% correction in the Nasdaq Composite.
To be sure, this hasn't been a good couple of weeks for individual tech stocks. Companies such as Intel Corp. (NASDAQ:INTC), Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL), International Business Machines (NYSE:IBM), Advanced Micro Devices (NYSE:AMD), Lam Research (NASDAQ:LRCX), and Symantec (NASDAQ:SYMC) have all seen their stocks hit. Some posted lower-than-expected earnings, some warned, and some saw selling despite seemingly decent results. Each stock drop has helped to weigh on the collective psyche of investors. In other words, each individual sell off has fed into the skepticism expressed above.
Continue reading Is tech hand-wringing creating opportunities for savvy investors?