<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Ask not for whom the writers strike tolls]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/08/ask-not-for-whom-the-writers-strike-tolls/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/08/ask-not-for-whom-the-writers-strike-tolls/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/08/ask-not-for-whom-the-writers-strike-tolls/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/jonstewart.jpg" alt="" />Ask not for whom the bell tolls, it tolls for Jon Stewart.<br /><br />Stewart, whose "Daily Show with Jon Stewart" returned to the air yesterday, has been supportive of the striking writers. Nonetheless, he <a href="http://featuresblogs.chicagotribune.com/entertainment_tv/2008/01/the-daily-show.html">apparently is annoyed with the Writers Guild of America</a>. During his show, Stewart mentioned that his production company tried to reach the same deal with the guild that David Letterman's Worldwide Pants received and was turned down.<br /><br /> Apparently, the guild wants to present a united front against the media conglomerates, including Comedy Central's corporate parent <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-a/via/nys">Viacom Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-a/via/nys">VIA</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Walt Disney Co.</a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>)'s ABC, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>)'s NBC and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Time Warner Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">TWX</a>). That's why Jay Leno and Jimmy Kimmel are being forced to appear as guests on each other's programs and why the <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-globes8jan08,0,4160947.story?coll=la-home-center">Golden Globes were canceled</a> by NBC.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/08/ask-not-for-whom-the-writers-strike-tolls/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ask not for whom the writers strike tolls</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/08/ask-not-for-whom-the-writers-strike-tolls/">Ask not for whom the writers strike tolls</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:37:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://featuresblogs.chicagotribune.com/entertainment_tv/2008/01/the-daily-show.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/08/ask-not-for-whom-the-writers-strike-tolls/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1081134/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/08/ask-not-for-whom-the-writers-strike-tolls/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ABC</category><category>CBS</category><category>comedy central</category><category>ComedyCentral</category><category>DIS</category><category>FOX</category><category>GE</category><category>Jay Leno</category><category>JayLeno</category><category>Jimmy Kimmel</category><category>JimmyKimmel</category><category>Jon Stewart</category><category>JonStewart</category><category>NBC</category><category>stephen colbert</category><category>StephenColbert</category><category>TWX</category><category>VIA</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:37:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Facebook makes Stephen Colbert a front-runner]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/29/facebook-makes-colbert-a-front-runner/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/29/facebook-makes-colbert-a-front-runner/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/29/facebook-makes-colbert-a-front-runner/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><img alt="Facebook logo" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/facebook-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Call him the Sanjaya of politics. Stephen Colbert's sarcastic quest for the presidency has established a legion of followers on Facebook. A Facebook group, <a href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=7406420086&amp;ref=mf">1,000,000 Strong For Stephen T Colbert</a> [login required], grew to a million in just over a week <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/29/business/media/29colbert.html?ref=business">according</a> to <em>The New York Times</em>.<br /><br />Similar groups for legitimate candidates have taken months to reach the elusive milestone, and some haven't reached it.<br /><br />When the Founding Fathers installed the electoral college, they did so based on the fear that the masses might make a terrible mistake and elect a bad leader. But could they ever have envisioned the possibility of a campaign that started as a joke gaining steam?<br /><br />Maybe <em>American Idol</em> needs an electoral college too.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/29/facebook-makes-colbert-a-front-runner/">Facebook makes Stephen Colbert a front-runner</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/29/business/media/29colbert.html?ref=business>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/29/facebook-makes-colbert-a-front-runner/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1024692/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/29/facebook-makes-colbert-a-front-runner/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Colbert</category><category>Facebook</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Politics</category><category>Sanjaya</category><category>Stephen Colbert</category><category>StephenColbert</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Jon Stewart extends 'Daily Show' contract through 2010]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/19/jon-stewart-extends-daily-show-contract-through-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/19/jon-stewart-extends-daily-show-contract-through-2010/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/19/jon-stewart-extends-daily-show-contract-through-2010/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><img width="200" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="261" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/jstew.jpg" />Fans of Comedy Central's left-leaning <em>The Daily Show</em> (this means you, Mom and Dad), rejoice! Jon Stewart will <a target="_blank" href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071018/ap_on_en_tv/jon_stewart_re_ups">remain the show's host </a>through at least 2010.  The affable anchor has signed a two-year contract extension that keeps him in the employ of the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-a/via/nys">Viacom</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-a/via/nys">VIA</a>) network through 2010. His previous contract was set to expire at the end of next year. <br /><br />In other news, fans of Stewart can review his <em>Daily </em>career, beginning in 1999, as Comedy Central has launched a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/index.jhtml">standalone website</a> for the program, featuring video clips dating back to January 11, 1999, when Stewart first took over the reins. Seriously, does anyone remember when rigid pretty-boy Craig Kilborn hosted the thing? It seems now as though <em>The Daily Show </em>and Stewart were simultaneously formed. The website also features episode synopses, games, and additional features. <br /><br />Stewart will also continue to serve in a executive producing and writing role. <br /><br />In addition to <em>South Park, The Daily Show </em>is the cable network's longest-running original series that is still on the air. It spawned a very successful spin-off -- <em>The Colbert Report -- </em>which itself may have spawned <a target="_blank" href="http://www.colbertnation.com/?sicontent=0&amp;sicreative=965975500&amp;siclientid=1838&amp;sitrackingid=6050184&amp;gclid=CJeG5b2om48CFQ2aOAod80WgfQ">our next Commander in Chief</a>. Referring to Colbert's (fake?) declaration of his candidacy earlier this week, Stewart was quoted by <em>The Associated Press</em> as joking: "I look forward to using this [contract] extension to having great fun at President Colbert's expense."<br /><br /><em>Beth Gaston Moon is an analyst at <a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/commentary/optionbytes.aspx">Schaeffer's Investment Research</a></em>.<br /><br /><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/19/jon-stewart-extends-daily-show-contract-through-2010/">Jon Stewart extends 'Daily Show' contract through 2010</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071018/ap_on_en_tv/jon_stewart_re_ups>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/19/jon-stewart-extends-daily-show-contract-through-2010/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/998634/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/19/jon-stewart-extends-daily-show-contract-through-2010/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>comedy</category><category>Comedy Central</category><category>ComedyCentral</category><category>Daily Show</category><category>DailyShow</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Jon Stewart</category><category>JonStewart</category><category>stephen colbert</category><category>StephenColbert</category><category>television</category><category>The Colbert Report</category><category>The Daily Show</category><category>TheColbertReport</category><category>TheDailyShow</category><category>VIA</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fox can't do political satire]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/15/fox-cant-do-political-satire/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/15/fox-cant-do-political-satire/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/15/fox-cant-do-political-satire/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corp.'s</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>) Fox News Channel (FNC) has admitted defeat in the field of political satire. That's because, according to <em><a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/fnc/half_hour_news_hour_shelved_65085.asp#more">MediaBistro</a></em>, it will shut down its short-lived attempt to satirize <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-a/via/nys">Viacom Inc.'s</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-a/via/nys">VIA</a>) Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert.</p>
<p>The TV news satire show which airs Sunday nights, first aired February 18 with more than 1.4 million viewers. But it has fallen back to an average of 258,000 viewers in its last 10 airings -- while still leading its time slot in every airing except one. FNC will air the final show September 16.</p>
<p>What happened? I don't really know why FNC is canceling the show if it was so successful. And since I've only seen a few clips, I can say that I found those clips to be unfunny. I think Stewart and Colbert satirize what passes for "fair and balanced" reporting on FNC. </p>
<p>And I think it would be pretty hard for any media outlet to do a good job of both creating the object of satire and to make viewers laugh at a satire of the satire of that object.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em>Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</em></a><em>, a management consulting and venture capital firm. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em>teaches management at Babson College</em></a><em> and edits </em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em>The Cohan Letter</em></a><em>. He has no financial interest in News Corp. or Viacom.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/15/fox-cant-do-political-satire/">Fox can't do political satire</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 15 Aug 2007 16:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/15/fox-cant-do-political-satire/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/966080/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/15/fox-cant-do-political-satire/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CBS</category><category>FNC</category><category>Fox News</category><category>FoxNews</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Jon Stewart</category><category>JonStewart</category><category>MediaBistro</category><category>NWS</category><category>Stephen Colbert</category><category>StephenColbert</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 16:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CNN vs. Fox News: Battle of the Brands]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/16/cnn-vs-fox-news-battle-of-the-brands/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/16/cnn-vs-fox-news-battle-of-the-brands/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/16/cnn-vs-fox-news-battle-of-the-brands/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/battle-of-the-brands/" rel="tag">Battle of the Brands</a></p><p><em>This post is part of our <strong><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/battle-of-the-brands/">Battle of the Brands</a></strong> feature. Let us know which brand you prefer, and watch out for more Battle of the Brands posts.</em></p>
<p><iframe border="0" align="right" src=" http://webcenter.polls.aol.com/modular.jsp?template=1089&amp;view=108895&amp;pollId=108993&amp;channel=aol_us_moneynews1" frameborder="0" width="175" scrolling="no" height="125"></iframe>The battle between <a href="http://www.cnn.com/">CNN</a> and <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/">Fox News</a> isn't a question of liberals and conservatives. That debate was settled long ago and the conservatives won.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation-ltd-del-cl-b/nws/nys">News Corp</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation-ltd-del-cl-b/nws/nys">NWS</a>) makes a ton of money from Fox News, which continues to dominate. Its ratings have rebounded after slipping last year. CNN parent <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner Inc</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) launched Headline Prime in 2005 as a Fox without Bill O'Reilly, complete with rabid right-wing talk show hosts like <a href="http://www.glennbeck.com/">Glenn Beck</a>.</p>
<p>One night for fun, I decided to compare O'Reilly and Beck. Boy was I lucky. I picked a night to DVR their shows when both hosts were at the the top of their games.</p>
<p>On his program, Beck railed against all sorts of people bent on destroying the America, including filmmaker Michael Moore, anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan, comedian Rosie O'Donnell, and pop star Elton John.</p>
<p>Elton John? Rocket Man? I was shocked too.</p>
<p>Apparently, Sir Elton is the "high priest of hypocrisy," according to Beck. The singer had a 60th birthday party at St. John the Divine, a big church in New York. Seems John, who has little use for religion, made some changes to the church building for the concert, including removing the pews. To make matters worse, John showed a background of a burning church at his show the next day at Madison Square Garden. Oh yeah, that was on a Sunday.</p>
<p>All of this was too much for the talk show host to take. </p>
<p>"If he wants to drop a few million to desecrate your church than who am I to judge, right? Wrong!" he said of the pop star.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/16/cnn-vs-fox-news-battle-of-the-brands/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>CNN vs. Fox News: Battle of the Brands</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/16/cnn-vs-fox-news-battle-of-the-brands/">CNN vs. Fox News: Battle of the Brands</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/16/cnn-vs-fox-news-battle-of-the-brands/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/861721/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/16/cnn-vs-fox-news-battle-of-the-brands/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Battle of the Brands</category><category>BattleOfTheBrands</category><category>bill o'reilly</category><category>BillO'reilly</category><category>cable news</category><category>CableNews</category><category>Cindy Sheehan</category><category>cnn</category><category>comedy central</category><category>ComedyCentral</category><category>conservative talk shows</category><category>ConservativeTalkShows</category><category>Elton John</category><category>fox news</category><category>FoxNews</category><category>glenn beck</category><category>GlennBeck</category><category>Headline Prime</category><category>HeadlinePrime</category><category>jon stewart</category><category>JonStewart</category><category>Michael Moore</category><category>O'Reilly Factor</category><category>O'reillyFactor</category><category>Rosie O'Donnell</category><category>stephen colbert</category><category>StephenColbert</category><category>Tonya Reiman</category><category>TonyaReiman</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:12:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Willie Nelson ice cream and Colbert filled with envy]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/20/willie-nelson-ice-cream-and-colbert-filled-with-envy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/20/willie-nelson-ice-cream-and-colbert-filled-with-envy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/20/willie-nelson-ice-cream-and-colbert-filled-with-envy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ul/" rel="tag">Unilever ADR (UL)</a></p><img width="160" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="160" border="" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/03/willie-nelson.jpg" alt="" />Last month, I <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/15/stephen-colbert-in-edible-form/">mentioned</a> how Ben &amp; Jerry's -- a unit of Unilever ADR (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/unilever-plc-amer/ul/nys">UL</a>), was honoring Stephen Colbert with his very own ice cream flavor. The whimsical ice cream makers have now launched another celebrity-linked flavor - Willie Nelson's Country Peach Cobbler, which swirls peach ice cream with cinnamon sugar shortbread pieces. <br /><br />Unfortunately for fans of the friendly face behind Farm Aid, the first taste will be somewhat delayed. The company is <a href="http://www.firstcoastnews.com/news/news-article.aspx?storyid=78062">recalling</a> roughly 250,000 pints of the new flavor because containers packed on January 23-24 and February 8-9 failed to list wheat as an ingredient, making it dangerous for those with a wheat allergy. <br /><br />Meanwhile, an envious Mr. Colbert may have a case of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schadenfreude">schadenfreude</a>. Reacting to news that Nelson also has a new flavor named in his honor, the <em>Colbert Report</em> host asked "What is it made out of? Shredded tax forms and hash?" Nelson is scheduled to appear on Colbert's program tonight. <br /><br /><em>Beth Gaston Moon is an analyst at <a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/">Schaeffer's Investment Research.</a></em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/20/willie-nelson-ice-cream-and-colbert-filled-with-envy/">Willie Nelson ice cream and Colbert filled with envy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 20 Mar 2007 10:09:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.firstcoastnews.com/news/news-article.aspx?storyid=78062>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/20/willie-nelson-ice-cream-and-colbert-filled-with-envy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/856483/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/20/willie-nelson-ice-cream-and-colbert-filled-with-envy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>stephen colbert</category><category>StephenColbert</category><category>ul unilever</category><category>UlUnilever</category><category>willie nelson</category><category>WillieNelson</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 10:09:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Media World: Should YouTubers hire lawyers?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/15/media-world-should-youtubers-hire-lawyers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/15/media-world-should-youtubers-hire-lawyers/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/15/media-world-should-youtubers-hire-lawyers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p>Question for people who post large chunks of their favorite TV shows on YouTube: do you think you're going to get sued?</p>
<p> Now that Viacom Inc. (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-a-new/via/nys/charts?timeframe=0&amp;freq=1&amp;state=1&amp;te=mountain&amp;vs1=on&amp;dv1=off&amp;dr=999&amp;hs1=on&amp;ss=on&amp;ss1=on&amp;vs=on&amp;settings=1&amp;tabs=charts&amp;scs=0&amp;vl=on&amp;daysb4=0&amp;hs=on&amp;vl1=on&amp;se=default"><span style="COLOR: purple">VIA</span></a>) is suing Google Inc. (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas/charts?dr=999"><span style="COLOR: purple">GOOG</span></a>) <span style="COLOR: purple"><font color="#800080"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/14/technology/14viacom.html">for $1 billion</a></font></span> that's not a far-fetched scenario. Google has tried and failed to cut deals with other big content providers. Unless Google pulls off a miracle, it's probably a matter of time before another big media company joins Viacom and another one after that </p>
<p>Although people hated the music industry's campaign against Napster and other file-sharing services, the message got out that you should pay for music that you download. Why is video sharing any different? Billionaire blogger <a href="http://www.blogmaverick.com/2007/03/13/you-go-viacom/"><font color="#800080">Mark Cuban</font></a>, a critic of YouTube, called the site "a haven for pirates." It's hard to disagree. </p>
<p>It took me 20, maybe 30 seconds surfing YouTube clips from "Daily Show with Jon Stewart," "The Colbert Report." "American Idol", "Lost" and" Family Guy" that would probably give lawyers from big media a fit. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/technology/tech-viacom-youtube-clips.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin"><font color="#800080">Reuters</font></a> came to the same conclusion. YouTube can be that oblivious. </p>
<p>Many of the YouTube clips I found were multi-minute chunks of hit shows. They were the funny moments, the highlights that fans enjoy. Some were as long as 15 minutes. Media companies would be insane to give that away for free. How is that legal? </p>
<p>Legal experts are divided over whether Viacom has a case against Google, according to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/14/technology/14viacom.html?pagewanted=2"><font color="#800080">The New York Times.</font></a> The safe harbor provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act may offer Google protection against people posting videos they don't own. As <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/14/whos-the-real-meany-google-or-viacom/"><font color="#800080">Melly Alazarki</font></a> pointed out yesterday, the DMCA was enacted during the Internet's Stone Age. Copyright holders have to flag objectionable content and ask sites like YouTube to take it down.</p>
<p> By the time that happens, the illegal content has spread to every corner of the Web. Remember it was still wrong to post other people's conent in the first place. </p>
<p>Some sort of balance has to be struck that doesn't stifle creativity and respects the rights of copyright holders. But if YouTube is to survive, it will have to figure a way to stop pirated content and punish those who post it. </p>
<p>So party on, YouTubers. The fun may not last. </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/15/media-world-should-youtubers-hire-lawyers/">Media World: Should YouTubers hire lawyers?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/14/technology/14viacom.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/15/media-world-should-youtubers-hire-lawyers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/853382/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/15/media-world-should-youtubers-hire-lawyers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>abc</category><category>cbs</category><category>comedy central</category><category>ComedyCentral</category><category>fox</category><category>jon stewart</category><category>JonStewart</category><category>nbc</category><category>stephen colbert</category><category>StephenColbert</category><category>tv networks</category><category>TvNetworks</category><category>youtube</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[From Jerry Garcia to Stephen Colbert: a tour of America's ice-creamiest celebrities]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/21/from-jerry-garcia-to-stephen-colbert-a-tour-of-americas-ice-cr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/21/from-jerry-garcia-to-stephen-colbert-a-tour-of-americas-ice-cr/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/21/from-jerry-garcia-to-stephen-colbert-a-tour-of-americas-ice-cr/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ul/" rel="tag">Unilever ADR (UL)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/02/cherry_garcia_top.jpg" />Right this moment (I imagine), a flavor expert somewhere deep in the Vermont offices of Unilever ADR (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/unilever-plc-amer/ul/nys">UL</a>) unit Ben &amp; Jerry's is asking a very, very difficult question: What does a celebrity taste like? And which celebrities do we even want to associate with vanilla ice cream, raspberry swirl and brownie bits (that would be Dave Matthews) or fudge-covered waffle cone pieces, ripples of caramel, and the patriotic vanilla ice cream (yep, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/15/stephen-colbert-in-edible-form/">Stephen Colbert</a>).<br /><br />BloggingStocks may be the only organization brave enough to wonder, <em>should Jerry Garcia really taste like cherries and fudge?</em> and <em>which celebrities are the ice-creamiest?</em> Does anyone buy the ice cream just because they like the celebrity, and, <em>isn't that a bit weird?</em> Do <em>you </em>want to taste the people you most admire? And is this all a liberal hippy conspiracy to keep ice cream Democratic?<br /><br />Let's begin by exploring where this whole celebrity-ice cream flavor thing started: <strong>Jerry Garcia</strong>. He and his band the Grateful Dead, well, let's just say that may have been where the term "groupie" started. People who love the Grateful Dead, <strong>they love the Grateful Dead. </strong>Oh, my, lord. So for the liberal (and then independent) company to name a flavor after the hippiest of all hippy icons, well, <em>totally</em> made sense. Are you familiar with the <a href="http://benandjerrys.com/our_company/about_us/our_history/timeline/">history of celebrities and ice cream</a>? If you do, you know that Cherry Garcia was the first ice cream ever named for a rock star, and appeared in 1987 at the suggestion of two deadheads from Portland, Maine.<br /><br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/02/cherry_garcia_scoop.jpg" />Because I'm very serious about my work, I sent my husband out in the dark of night for a quart of Cherry Garcia, the flavor that started it all, and the number one flavor on <a href="http://benandjerrys.com/our_products/top_ten/">Ben &amp; Jerry's flavor roster</a>. Cherries and "fudge flakes" (which seem very much like "pieces of chocolate" to me, but I'm not the one describing the flavors on the package) are mixed into cherry ice cream. Does Cherry Garcia deserve its place on the top of the roster? And is it because of the taste of the ice cream, or the connection with the band?<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/21/from-jerry-garcia-to-stephen-colbert-a-tour-of-americas-ice-cr/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>From Jerry Garcia to Stephen Colbert: a tour of America's ice-creamiest celebrities</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/21/from-jerry-garcia-to-stephen-colbert-a-tour-of-americas-ice-cr/">From Jerry Garcia to Stephen Colbert: a tour of America's ice-creamiest celebrities</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/21/from-jerry-garcia-to-stephen-colbert-a-tour-of-americas-ice-cr/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/817357/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/21/from-jerry-garcia-to-stephen-colbert-a-tour-of-americas-ice-cr/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>americone dream</category><category>AmericoneDream</category><category>ben</category><category>ben and jerry</category><category>ben and jerry's</category><category>BenAndJerry</category><category>BenAndJerry's</category><category>cherry garcia</category><category>CherryGarcia</category><category>colbert</category><category>flavors</category><category>garcia</category><category>ice cream</category><category>ice cream flavors</category><category>IceCream</category><category>IceCreamFlavors</category><category>jerry</category><category>jerry garcia</category><category>jerry's</category><category>JerryGarcia</category><category>liberal</category><category>phish</category><category>phish food</category><category>PhishFood</category><category>stephen</category><category>stephen colbert</category><category>StephenColbert</category><category>ul</category><category>unilever</category><category>wavy gravy</category><category>WavyGravy</category><category>woodstock</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Vetted deserves a place in Buzzword Hall of Shame as does Brangelina]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/29/vetted-deserves-a-place-in-buzzword-hall-of-shame-as-does-branga/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/29/vetted-deserves-a-place-in-buzzword-hall-of-shame-as-does-branga/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/29/vetted-deserves-a-place-in-buzzword-hall-of-shame-as-does-branga/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/best-and-worst-2006/" rel="tag">Best and Worst 2006</a></p><p>Kudos to a reader named Kathleen for pointing out that we missed "vetted" in our list of the <a href="http://money.aol.com/best-and-worst-in-money-2006/most-overused-buzzwords">most overused buzzwords</a>. I also agree with her that the mashing together of celebrity couple names like Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie (Brangelina) has got to stop.</p>
<p>We probably should have vetted our buzzword list with Kathleen (who didn't give her last name) before publishing it. Vetted, like all buzzwords, is a fancy-sounding word that describes something simple. It started out meaning reviewing or checking out for accuracy as in the qualifications of a nominee for a cabinet position on an article for scientific journal. Now, it's being bandied about to describe every type of review. For example, officials in Louisville are vetting a <a href="http://www.courier-journal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061211/NEWS01/612110340">dog ordinance</a>. When words like vetting get overused, their original meaning becomes diluted. <br /></p>
<p>Finally, please dear God, when will the name mashing madness end? I mean first there was Bennifer, now Brangelina. I think Stephen Colbert created the ultimate celebrity couple when he merged William H. Macy and Felicity Huffman into Filliam H. Muffman. With the 2008 presidential election gearing up, I'm afraid the name mashing will only get worse. I'll get the process started with Hillbama (Hillary Cilnton and Barack Obama).</p>
<p>--Jonathan Berr is the editor of <a href="http://www.desperateinvestors.com">http://www.desperateinvestors.com</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/29/vetted-deserves-a-place-in-buzzword-hall-of-shame-as-does-branga/">Vetted deserves a place in Buzzword Hall of Shame as does Brangelina</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/29/vetted-deserves-a-place-in-buzzword-hall-of-shame-as-does-branga/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/726366/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/29/vetted-deserves-a-place-in-buzzword-hall-of-shame-as-does-branga/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Angelina Jolie</category><category>AngelinaJolie</category><category>Brad Pitt</category><category>BradPitt</category><category>buzzwords</category><category>celeberities</category><category>Comedy Central</category><category>ComedyCentral</category><category>Politics</category><category>Presidential Election</category><category>PresidentialElection</category><category>Stephen Colbert</category><category>StephenColbert</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[TWX is undervalued, says CEO]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/twx-is-undervalued-says-ceo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/twx-is-undervalued-says-ceo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/twx-is-undervalued-says-ceo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Parsons">Richard Parsons</a> is one optimistic dude. The Time Warner CEO gave a positively rosy-hued speech at last week's shareholders meeting in Atlanta, with the reassuring statement that "our company is clearly undervalued."<span class="bodytext"><br /><br /><span class="bodytext">Among other plans, Parsons believes he can rejuvenate AOL by increasing revenue from online advertising (some of our BloggingStocks readers, meanwhile, seem to think that&nbsp; AOL's <a href="http://twx.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/sign-sealed-delivered-aols-bulk-email-fees/">"certified" email program</a> is also part of the plan to jump-start AOL).</span><br /><br />And while he's made some bold moves -- slashing some 2,400 jobs, for instance -- the stock has remained relatively static.<br /><br />Is it just me, or is Parsons' cheerfulness a bit like shuffling deck chairs on the Titanic? Or is it rather -- in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Colbert_at_the_2006_White_House_Correspondents%27_Association_Dinner">Stephen Colbert's famous phrase</a> -- like shuffling chairs on the Hindenberg?</span><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/twx-is-undervalued-says-ceo/">TWX is undervalued, says CEO</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 22 May 2006 13:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nydailynews.com/business/story/419303p-354104c.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/twx-is-undervalued-says-ceo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/620722/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/22/twx-is-undervalued-says-ceo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AOL</category><category>Hindenberg</category><category>Richard Parsons</category><category>RichardParsons</category><category>stephen colbert</category><category>StephenColbert</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>Titanic</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Anne Metz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 13:50:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
