<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Is Microsoft Floundering with Steve Ballmer at the Helm?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/22/is-microsoft-floundering-with-steve-ballmer-at-the-helm/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/22/is-microsoft-floundering-with-steve-ballmer-at-the-helm/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/22/is-microsoft-floundering-with-steve-ballmer-at-the-helm/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><img border="0" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/ballmer.jpg" width="200" height="203" alt="" />Although it has gotten wave after wave of bad press recently, is Microsoft Corporation (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) really on the ropes in terms of not having a vision or executing a mission? Far from it. Competitors like Apple, Inc. (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) and Google, Inc. (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) have taken the limelight away from the world's largest software company in recent years with flashy products, sales numbers that would make any CEO grin and general rich tech-worthiness in terms of press coverage and upwardly mobile stock prices. At the same time, Microsoft has had one thing go well for it -- the recent launch of the Windows 7 operating system.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/22/is-microsoft-floundering-with-steve-ballmer-at-the-helm/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is Microsoft Floundering with Steve Ballmer at the Helm?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/22/is-microsoft-floundering-with-steve-ballmer-at-the-helm/">Is Microsoft Floundering with Steve Ballmer at the Helm?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10419508-16.html?tag=inside>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/22/is-microsoft-floundering-with-steve-ballmer-at-the-helm/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19289414/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/22/is-microsoft-floundering-with-steve-ballmer-at-the-helm/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bill Gates</category><category>BillGates</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>Microsoft CEO</category><category>MicrosoftCeo</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Steve Ballmer</category><category>SteveBallmer</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Closing Bell: late-day greed trumped fear (CIT, RIMM, HGSI, MSFT, ETFC) ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/closing-bell-late-day-greed-trumped-fear-cit-rimm-hgsi-msft/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/closing-bell-late-day-greed-trumped-fear-cit-rimm-hgsi-msft/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/closing-bell-late-day-greed-trumped-fear-cit-rimm-hgsi-msft/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-green.jpg" alt="" />Today was a whip-around day. All day. Despite better construction and better manufacturing employment data, the markets looked like they were trying to roll over again before the end of day rally took stocks back up on the day. It seems that bargain hunters won over the fear that was felt earlier this afternoon. <br /><br />Here were today's unofficial closing bell levels:<br /><br />Dow 	9,789.21 	+76.48 	(0.79%) <br />S&amp;P 500 	1,042.82 	+6.63 	(0.64%) <br />Nasdaq 	2,049.20 	+4.09 	(0.20%)<br /><br /><a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/11/02/top-10-analyst-upgrades-downgrades-initiations-biib-incy-mot-cmcsa-jwn-odp-palm-rimm-rcl-yum/">Top 10 Analyst Calls</a><br /><a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/11/02/top-day-trader-alerts-cit-dndn-f-hgsi-mot/">Top Day Trader Alerts</a><br /><a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/11/02/todays-best-market-rumors-1122009-bkodflpalmaapl/">Top Stock Rumors</a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/closing-bell-late-day-greed-trumped-fear-cit-rimm-hgsi-msft/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Closing Bell: late-day greed trumped fear (CIT, RIMM, HGSI, MSFT, ETFC) </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/closing-bell-late-day-greed-trumped-fear-cit-rimm-hgsi-msft/">Closing Bell: late-day greed trumped fear (CIT, RIMM, HGSI, MSFT, ETFC) </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/closing-bell-late-day-greed-trumped-fear-cit-rimm-hgsi-msft/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19219659/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/closing-bell-late-day-greed-trumped-fear-cit-rimm-hgsi-msft/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CIT</category><category>ETFC</category><category>HGSI</category><category>lupus</category><category>MSFT</category><category>RIMM</category><category>steve ballmer</category><category>SteveBallmer</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft's Ballmer: Windows 7 software won't increase PC sales]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/microsofts-ballmer-windows-7-software-wont-increase-pc-sa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/microsofts-ballmer-windows-7-software-wont-increase-pc-sa/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/microsofts-ballmer-windows-7-software-wont-increase-pc-sa/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/10/windows-7-logo.jpg" alt="" /><a href=" http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href=" http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) CEO Steve Ballmer has indicated that the October 22 release of the Windows 7 operating system <a href="http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/other/display/20091008123736_Windows_7_Will_Not_Boost_Sales_of_PCs_Tangibly_Microsoft.html">won't increase PC sales significantly</a>. That's quite a statement from the CEO of the world's most influential software company on a new flagship piece of software that is said to be a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/12/windows-7-review/">truly shining product</a>.<br /> <br /> Why would the release of Windows 7 and its inclusion on millions of new PCs not increase sales? Ballmer's stated that "There will be a surge of PCs but it will probably not be huge," but it isn't really telling. Microsoft's bottom line will rely heavily on sales of its upcoming Windows 7 software -- and if PC sales don't pick up, how will Windows 7 sales fare? Microsoft licenses its software to PC makers, so it's not directly tied to retail and wholesale PC sales. Still, indirectly they're joined at the hip.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/microsofts-ballmer-windows-7-software-wont-increase-pc-sa/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft's Ballmer: Windows 7 software won't increase PC sales</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/microsofts-ballmer-windows-7-software-wont-increase-pc-sa/">Microsoft's Ballmer: Windows 7 software won't increase PC sales</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 09 Oct 2009 11:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/other/display/20091008123736_Windows_7_Will_Not_Boost_Sales_of_PCs_Tangibly_Microsoft.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/microsofts-ballmer-windows-7-software-wont-increase-pc-sa/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19190235/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/microsofts-ballmer-windows-7-software-wont-increase-pc-sa/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Steve Ballmer</category><category>SteveBallmer</category><category>Windows 7</category><category>Windows 7 release</category><category>Windows7</category><category>Windows7Release</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 11:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft's Ballmer slams IBM's potential purchase of Sun Microsystems]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/20/microsofts-ballmer-slams-ibms-potential-purchase-of-sun-micros/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/20/microsofts-ballmer-slams-ibms-potential-purchase-of-sun-micros/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/20/microsofts-ballmer-slams-ibms-potential-purchase-of-sun-micros/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/java/" rel="tag">Sun Microsystems (JAVA)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/sun.jpg" />If <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM</a>) really does go ahead and buy <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sun-microsystems-inc/java/nas">Sun Microsystems</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sun-microsystems-inc/java/nas">JAVA</a>) for a cool $6.5 billion or more, the two former adversaries could be joined into a powerful computing combination. One of its -- no, its largest competitor would be: <a href="http:// http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http:// http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>). With many powerful players challenging Microsoft's dominance these days (Google in the consumer space), here's another one. That is, if the merger speculation turns out to be true.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/20/microsofts-ballmer-slams-ibms-potential-purchase-of-sun-micros/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft's Ballmer slams IBM's potential purchase of Sun Microsystems</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/20/microsofts-ballmer-slams-ibms-potential-purchase-of-sun-micros/">Microsoft's Ballmer slams IBM's potential purchase of Sun Microsystems</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessinsider.com/ballmer-sun-micro-nothing-but-a-sandbag-for-ibm-2009-3>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/20/microsofts-ballmer-slams-ibms-potential-purchase-of-sun-micros/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1493379/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/20/microsofts-ballmer-slams-ibms-potential-purchase-of-sun-micros/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>IBM Corp.</category><category>IbmCorp.</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft Corp.</category><category>MicrosoftCorp.</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Steve Ballmer</category><category>SteveBallmer</category><category>Sun Microsystems</category><category>SunMicrosystems</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft job cuts are another sign of the times]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/microsoft-job-cuts-are-another-sign-of-the-times/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/microsoft-job-cuts-are-another-sign-of-the-times/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/microsoft-job-cuts-are-another-sign-of-the-times/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/msft.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp. </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://?">MSFT</a>) today joined the ever-growing parade o<a href="http://?">f companies firing employees. <br /></a><br />The world's largest software maker is laying off 5,000 people, about 5% of its staff, in its first company-wide dismissal of workers. The move is not surprising.<br /><br />Though the Redmond, Washington-based company is a cash-generating machine, investors are worried that it will be hurt by the slowdown in corporate IT spending. Last month,<a href="http://www.cio.com.au/article/270315/forrester_slashes_it_spending_forecast_recession_deepens?fp=39&amp;fpid=25880"> Forrester Research</a> projected that spending by businesses on technology would rise 1.6% in the U.S. That's down from a projection of more than 6% made in August.<br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/microsoft-job-cuts-are-another-sign-of-the-times/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft job cuts are another sign of the times</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/microsoft-job-cuts-are-another-sign-of-the-times/">Microsoft job cuts are another sign of the times</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a8nC10FfiQF8&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/microsoft-job-cuts-are-another-sign-of-the-times/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1437488/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/22/microsoft-job-cuts-are-another-sign-of-the-times/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Bill Gates</category><category>BillGates</category><category>featured</category><category>Goog</category><category>IBM</category><category>INTC</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Nintendooo</category><category>Steve Ballmer</category><category>SteveBallmer</category><category>tech stocks</category><category>TechStocks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:58:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Steve Ballmer killed Microsoft's big chance at search]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/16/steve-ballmer-killed-microsofts-big-chance-at-search/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/16/steve-ballmer-killed-microsofts-big-chance-at-search/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/16/steve-ballmer-killed-microsofts-big-chance-at-search/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/msft.jpg" />As <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) gets ready for another round of talks with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) about buying its search business, the news that CEO Steve Ballmer killed two chances to get into search several years ago has emerged.</p>
<p>While there is some chance that the new chief of Yahoo! may elect to keep the portal company's search business, there is little reason not to at least hear Microsoft's latest offer.</p>
<p>Ballmer had the opportunity for MSFT to build online search empire almost ten years ago. <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123207131111388507.html?mod=testMod">According to</a> <em>The Wall Steed Journal</em>, "In 2000, before Google married Web search with advertising, Microsoft had a rudimentary system that did the same, called Keywords, running on the Web. Advertisers began signing up. " For reasons that are hard to fathom, the world largest software company thought that an ad business built on search could hurt revenue from its other businesses. Microsoft also had the chance to buy a relatively small search company and passed.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/16/steve-ballmer-killed-microsofts-big-chance-at-search/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Steve Ballmer killed Microsoft's big chance at search</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/16/steve-ballmer-killed-microsofts-big-chance-at-search/">Steve Ballmer killed Microsoft's big chance at search</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:41:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/16/steve-ballmer-killed-microsofts-big-chance-at-search/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1431456/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/16/steve-ballmer-killed-microsofts-big-chance-at-search/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advertising</category><category>Altavista</category><category>GOOG</category><category>inthenews</category><category>MSFT</category><category>search engines</category><category>SearchEngines</category><category>Steve Ballmer</category><category>SteveBallmer</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:41:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The world's 10 biggest losers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/26/the-worlds-10-biggest-losers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/26/the-worlds-10-biggest-losers/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/26/the-worlds-10-biggest-losers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/shld/" rel="tag">Sears Holdings (SHLD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/orcl/" rel="tag">Oracle Corp (ORCL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lvs/" rel="tag">Las Vegas Sands (LVS)</a></p><p>As we begin the trek to grandmother's house, it's worth reflecting on what we have to be thankful for. The answer? When it comes to money, most of us have a lot less than we did a year ago. But for those of you who have your health and your families to comfort you, it will cost much less to buy the gasoline to visit than it would have in July. And as you're driving to visit those families -- consider how much less you lost in the last year than the world's 10 biggest losers.</p>
<p>According to the web site, <a href="http://businesssheet.alleyinsider.com/">The Business Sheet</a>, those unfortunate people suffered a mind-boggling $176 billion in lost stock market value in the last 12 months. It turns out that 52% of the losses were suffered by three executives based in India. Here they are:</p>
<ul>
    <li><strong>Anil Ambani <u><a href="http://businesssheet.alleyinsider.com/loser-1-anil-ambani">- $32.5 billion</a></u></strong>. Ambani heads Reliance Communications that invested $500 million in Dreamworks earlier this year. </li>
    <li><strong>Lakshmi Mittal</strong> <strong><u>- $30.5 billion.</u></strong> Mittal heads ArcelorMittal which has suffered from a decline in the price of steel. </li>
    <li><strong>Mukesh Ambani <u>-$28.2 billion</u></strong> is Anil's brother and controls Reliance Industries, a petrochemical manufacturer.</li>
</ul>
<br />These are some other folks that make The Business Sheet's list:<br />
<ul>
    <li><strong>Sheldon Adelson <u>-$30 billion</u></strong>. I did consulting work for Adelson about 22 years ago and he is quite a character. His <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/las-vegas-sands-corp/lvs/nys">Las Vegas Sands</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/las-vegas-sands-corp/lvs/nys">LVS</a>) casino is suffering from the economic slowdown and he's had some trouble with debt. </li>
    <li><strong>Warren Buffett <u>-$13.6 billion</u></strong>. As I <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/20/buffett-is-12-poorer-than-yesterday/">posted</a>, Buffett's <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-a/brk.a/nys">Berkshire Hathaway</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-a/brk.a/nys">BRK.A</a>) has had some problems this year. </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/26/the-worlds-10-biggest-losers/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The world's 10 biggest losers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/26/the-worlds-10-biggest-losers/">The world's 10 biggest losers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 26 Nov 2008 17:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/26/the-worlds-10-biggest-losers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1383990/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/26/the-worlds-10-biggest-losers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>anil ambani</category><category>AnilAmbani</category><category>eddie lampert</category><category>EddieLampert</category><category>kirk kerkorian</category><category>KirkKerkorian</category><category>lakshmi mittal</category><category>LakshmiMittal</category><category>larry page</category><category>LarryPage</category><category>mukesh ambani</category><category>MukeshAmbani</category><category>sergey brin</category><category>SergeyBrin</category><category>sheldon adelson</category><category>SheldonAdelson</category><category>steve ballmer</category><category>SteveBallmer</category><category>warrren buffet</category><category>WarrrenBuffet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 17:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[How poor are CEOs now? Is Buffett going broke?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/23/how-poor-are-ceos-now-is-buffett-going-broke/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/23/how-poor-are-ceos-now-is-buffett-going-broke/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/23/how-poor-are-ceos-now-is-buffett-going-broke/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rich-in-america/" rel="tag">Rich in America</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><em>The Wall Street Journal </em>must have better things to do with its time and all that expensive newsprint. The paper reports that CEOs of 175 large US companies <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122470916865059839.html">have lost over</a> $42 billion in net worth from the end of their most recent fiscal years though last week. </p>
<p>By this calculations, Warren Buffett is down $9.6 billion. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft's</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) has seen his piece of the software company drop by almost $5 billion in value.</p>
<p>The reason that the data is foolish is that a loss is not really ever a loss unless and until the underlying securities are sold. People like Buffett and Ballmer don't need billions of dollars now, and they are still extraordinarily rich.They are unlikely sellers Two years from now, their net worth may be higher than they were in 2007. Who knows?</p>
<p>The calculation of wealth, made popular by the <em>Forbes 400</em> is an exercise in futile math. What the rich are worth, especially if their money is in liquid securities is a snapshot in time, and one which can change hour-by-hour. </p>
<p>Why bother to eat of the time of good reporters?</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em></p>
<h3 class="first"> </h3>
<h3 class="first"> </h3><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/23/how-poor-are-ceos-now-is-buffett-going-broke/">How poor are CEOs now? Is Buffett going broke?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 23 Oct 2008 04:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122470916865059839.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/23/how-poor-are-ceos-now-is-buffett-going-broke/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1350584/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/23/how-poor-are-ceos-now-is-buffett-going-broke/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Steve Ballmer</category><category>SteveBallmer</category><category>Warren Buffett</category><category>WarrenBuffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 04:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft thinking about Yahoo once again?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/16/microsoft-thinking-about-yahoo-once-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/16/microsoft-thinking-about-yahoo-once-again/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/16/microsoft-thinking-about-yahoo-once-again/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p>It wasn't all that long ago that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/msft/nys">Microsoft Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/msft/nys">MSFT)</a> eyed <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yhoo/nys">Yahoo, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yhoo/nys">YHOO</a>) with an eye towards acquisition. Yahoo fought it off, spending a great deal of money and lawyer's time, and filling any tech-oriented new outlets with headlines for quite a while.<br /><br />Now the smell of acquisition is once more in the air thanks to Microsoft honcho Steve Ballmer saying a deal would "make sense." Yahoo is even cheaper than the $19/share level that first got Microsoft interested. In a shaky economy, giants like Microsoft can afford to go hunting for small companies to snap up.<br /><br />Now this is so far just an off-hand statement (in appearance). Ballmer could just be testing the waters to see how Yahoo! and its shareholders react. So far today, the market reacted by bidding the share price of Yahoo up.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/16/microsoft-thinking-about-yahoo-once-again/">Microsoft thinking about Yahoo once again?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/external/venturebeat/2008/10/16/16venturebeat-microsofts-ballmer-sneezes-yahoo-has-tissues-99216.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/16/microsoft-thinking-about-yahoo-once-again/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1344606/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/16/microsoft-thinking-about-yahoo-once-again/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>steve ballmer</category><category>SteveBallmer</category><category>yahoo acquisition</category><category>YahooAcquisition</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tobias Buckell]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CEOs practice the old soft shoe]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/08/ceos-practice-the-old-soft-shoe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/08/ceos-practice-the-old-soft-shoe/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/08/ceos-practice-the-old-soft-shoe/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p><a href="http://flickr.com/photos/clearlyambiguous/165316414/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/165316414_ff3b59be2b_m[1].jpg" alt="" /></a>CEOs have been doing the old soft shoe at quarterly report time since the market first form, but <a href="http://www.portfolio.com/news-markets/top-5/2008/08/07/Tech-Two-Step">dancing now seems to have become a favored pastime of CEOs</a> include Steve Ballmer of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>), Jerry Yang of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) and (surprise? hardly) Mark Cuban (also a yahoo). </p>
<p>Yang busted some moves recently dancing with the star of <em>Where the Hell is Matt?,</em> the outstanding internet feature following adventurer and dancer (I use the term loosely) Matt Harding. Don't miss the video at the end of this post, if you're not familiar with Matt. - it's perhaps the most charming, uplifting video I've seen in years.</p>
<p>Of course, who can forget Steve Ballmer's dance at the podium during a Microsoft presentation? And, of course, Mark, 'Gimme the Cubs" Cuban performing on <a href="http://www.realitytvworld.com/news/mark-cuban-dancing-with-stars-elimination-tough-swallow-5982.php">Dancing with the Stars</a>?</p>
<p>Come to think of it, many CEOs are already quite accomplished at performing the fan dance with their balance sheets. Ex-Gov. Spitzer has shown his fondness for the hustle and the shag, while Donald Rumsfeld is still waiting for the cakewalk to begin. Senator Craig seems to favor the swing, while President Bush appears dead-set on taking on the Persian Dance before he waltzes out of the White House.</p>
<p>And me? Having lived through the Vietnam Era, I'm doing the Time Warp again.</p>
<p><em>Thanks to Portfolio.com</em> </p>
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/zlfKdbWwruY&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/zlfKdbWwruY&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/08/ceos-practice-the-old-soft-shoe/">CEOs practice the old soft shoe</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 08 Aug 2008 15:17:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/08/ceos-practice-the-old-soft-shoe/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1279381/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/08/ceos-practice-the-old-soft-shoe/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ceo dancing</category><category>CeoDancing</category><category>jerry yang</category><category>JerryYang</category><category>mark cuban</category><category>MarkCuban</category><category>steve ballmer</category><category>SteveBallmer</category><category>where the hell is matt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Barlow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 15:17:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Closing Bell: Late day recovery fizzles as we enter earnings season]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/07/closing-bell-late-day-recovery-fizzles-as-we-enter-earnings-sea/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/07/closing-bell-late-day-recovery-fizzles-as-we-enter-earnings-sea/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/07/closing-bell-late-day-recovery-fizzles-as-we-enter-earnings-sea/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aa/" rel="tag">Alcoa Inc (AA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fnm/" rel="tag">Federal Natl Mtge (FNM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mrk/" rel="tag">Merck and Co (MRK)</a></p>If we told you that a $3.00-plus drop in the price of oil wouldn't cause a major stock rally, it might only not be a surprise the bears who believe we are headed lower no matter what.  Today was one where the markets spent much time in negative territory and then recovering towards the end of the day before making one last dive.  If you think it was a quiet day, we had nearly a 300-point difference between today's high in the morning and the lows before today's recovery. These are today's <em>unofficial</em> closing levels:<br />
<ul>
    <li>DJIA 11,227.72 (-60.82)</li>
    <li>S&amp;P500 1,252.64 (-10.26)</li>
    <li>NASDAQ 2,243.11 (-2.27)</li>
    <li>10-YR T-Note 3.93% (-0.043%)</li>
    <li><a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2008/07/the-52-week-l-3.html">52-Week Lows</a></li>
    <li><a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2008/07/top-10-pre-ma-2.html">Top 10 Analyst Calls</a></li>
</ul>
<br /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">The Walt Disney Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) saw a severe downgrade after Lehman cut it to Underweight on its premium to peers and weakness tied to Theme Park exposure. Shares were down over 2% at $30.22 in today's final minutes.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/07/closing-bell-late-day-recovery-fizzles-as-we-enter-earnings-sea/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Closing Bell: Late day recovery fizzles as we enter earnings season</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/07/closing-bell-late-day-recovery-fizzles-as-we-enter-earnings-sea/">Closing Bell: Late day recovery fizzles as we enter earnings season</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 07 Jul 2008 16:26:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/07/closing-bell-late-day-recovery-fizzles-as-we-enter-earnings-sea/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1247994/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/07/closing-bell-late-day-recovery-fizzles-as-we-enter-earnings-sea/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>carl icahn</category><category>CarlIcahn</category><category>gardasil</category><category>mortgages</category><category>steve ballmer</category><category>SteveBallmer</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 16:26:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft (MSFT) to give up on buying big web companies]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/20/microsoft-msft-to-give-up-on-buying-big-web-companies/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/20/microsoft-msft-to-give-up-on-buying-big-web-companies/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/20/microsoft-msft-to-give-up-on-buying-big-web-companies/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mnst/" rel="tag">Monster Worldwide (MNST)</a></p><p>Many Wall Street analysts thought that when <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/monster-worldwide-inc/mnst/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/monster-worldwide-inc/mnst/nas">MSFT</a>) lost its bid for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/monster-worldwide-inc/mnst/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/monster-worldwide-inc/mnst/nas">YHOO</a>) that it would take the $45 billion it was going to spend and buy other online companies.</p>
<p>Think again. Microsoft's management says it is not so. <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9f71573c-3e3e-11dd-b16d-0000779fd2ac.html">According to</a> the <em>FT</em>, "Steve Ballmer, chief executive, scotched talk that Microsoft would turn to a `plan B' of other acquisitions to boost its online presence." Ballmer feels that buying more internet companies will not improve its share of the search market. He is not simply after more pageviews.</p>
<p>The news is probably disappointing to several large online companies. AOL, Facebook, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/monster-worldwide-inc/mnst/nas">Monster</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/monster-worldwide-inc/mnst/nas">MNST</a>), and Digg might all have been part of a Microsoft plan to improve the size of its presence on the web.</p>
<p>The Microsoft comments send another message. Search is important. Display advertising is not. Search is an efficient way to make money. Display advertising's best growth years are behind it.</p>
<p>If Ballmer is right, the online world is about to go through a major upheaval. </p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/20/microsoft-msft-to-give-up-on-buying-big-web-companies/">Microsoft (MSFT) to give up on buying big web companies</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9f71573c-3e3e-11dd-b16d-0000779fd2ac.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/20/microsoft-msft-to-give-up-on-buying-big-web-companies/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1231394/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/20/microsoft-msft-to-give-up-on-buying-big-web-companies/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aol</category><category>facebook</category><category>internet advertising</category><category>InternetAdvertising</category><category>inthenews</category><category>MNST</category><category>MSFT</category><category>search advertising</category><category>SearchAdvertising</category><category>steve ballmer</category><category>SteveBallmer</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[How Steve Ballmer got his job]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/how-steve-ballmer-got-his-job/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/how-steve-ballmer-got-his-job/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/how-steve-ballmer-got-his-job/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a></p><p>In a bit of investigative reporting that no one will care about, <em>The Wall Street Journal </em>has discovered that a series of disputes between Steve Ballmer and Bill Gates eight years ago caused a changing of the guard at the company. The paper <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121261241035146237.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news">writes that</a> "The conflict between the two men paralyzed business-strategy decisions that the company still wrestles with today. Board members stepped in to try to mediate a truce."</p>
<p>The piece in the <em>Journal</em> is a nice human interest story, but that it would be the top story at the paper is a bit odd. That is until the reader considers that the cult of personality is still alive and well in American business. Chiefs like Lee Iaccoca and Jack Welch have written best-selling books. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) customers and shareholders worship Steve Jobs. </p>
<p>All of that, to a large extent, takes the eye off of the ball. The people who run large companies, even those that are fabulously successful, are only doing the jobs that the investing public expects of them. Even if they are founders. Gates and Jobs decided to take their companies public. After that, the only reasonable question is whether they made shareholders money. </p>
<p>In many ways, the transition from Gates to Ballmer has been a failure. Eight years ago, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) traded at $53. Now its stands at under $28. Gates may have turned the CEO job over to Ballmer, but neither has done the stockholders any favors.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/how-steve-ballmer-got-his-job/">How Steve Ballmer got his job</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 05 Jun 2008 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121261241035146237.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/how-steve-ballmer-got-his-job/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1216242/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/how-steve-ballmer-got-his-job/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Bill Gates</category><category>BillGates</category><category>inthenews</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Steve Ballmer</category><category>SteveBallmer</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Serious Money: Microsoft may have escaped Yahoo disaster]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/serious-money-microsoft-may-have-escaped-yahoo-disaster/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/serious-money-microsoft-may-have-escaped-yahoo-disaster/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/serious-money-microsoft-may-have-escaped-yahoo-disaster/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/" rel="tag">Serious Money</a></p><p>Recently I posted a <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/12/serious-money-metrics-anyone-aapl-ebay-ge-goog-msft-tw/">Serious Money metrics story</a> that included <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">MSFT</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Yahoo Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">YHOO</a>) comparisons along with six other stocks. Until now I have not felt very strongly about the merits of Microsoft's offer to acquire Yahoo! and merge assets and features.</p>
<p>I was leaning toward the <em>price is too high camp</em>, but now, after Microsoft has withdrawn the offer and I have looked at the current state of affairs of both companies, I think it did the right thing and may have avoided a nightmare.</p>
<p>To bring Yahoo! into the fold, Microsoft would have had to find enough cost savings by eliminating overlapping departments or it would have had to hope it could double Yahoo's earnings. If not, the acquisition would unduly weigh down the mother ship, because Microsoft's <strong>P/E Ratio</strong> of 17.08 is half that of Yahoo!'s 34.25.</p>
<div>When you look at the <strong>ROE,</strong> <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">MSFT</a>) -- with its 45.28% -- has a four times greater return than that of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Yahoo Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">YHOO</a>)'s 10.96%. Yahoo looks like another drag.</div><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/serious-money-microsoft-may-have-escaped-yahoo-disaster/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Serious Money: Microsoft may have escaped Yahoo disaster</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/serious-money-microsoft-may-have-escaped-yahoo-disaster/">Serious Money: Microsoft may have escaped Yahoo disaster</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 14 May 2008 15:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/serious-money-microsoft-may-have-escaped-yahoo-disaster/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1193514/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/14/serious-money-microsoft-may-have-escaped-yahoo-disaster/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bill gates</category><category>BillGates</category><category>brk.a</category><category>carl icahn</category><category>CarlIcahn</category><category>jerry yang</category><category>JerryYang</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>steve ballmer</category><category>SteveBallmer</category><category>warren buffett</category><category>WarrenBuffett</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 15:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Newspaper wap-up: Tech firms to invest in wireless]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/07/newspaper-wap-up-tech-firms-to-invest-in-wireless/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/07/newspaper-wap-up-tech-firms-to-invest-in-wireless/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/07/newspaper-wap-up-tech-firms-to-invest-in-wireless/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/s/" rel="tag">Sprint Nextel Corp (S)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cmcsa/" rel="tag">Comcast Cl'A' (CMCSA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wb/" rel="tag">Wachovia Corp (WB)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/fly-logo-(aol).gif"  alt="" /></a>MAJOR PAPERS:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>The <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121010437224271501.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a> reported that an alliance of cable, Internet and chip titans will announce plans to invest $3.2B in a company that will deliver Web access for laptops and cellphones using WiMax. The venture, valued at over $12B, includes <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sprint-nextel-corporation/s/nys">Sprint Nextel Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sprint-nextel-corporation/s/nys">S</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/clearwire-corporation/clwr/nas">Clearwire Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/clearwire-corporation/clwr/nas">CLWR</a>) and will be backed by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/comcast-corporation/cmcsa/nas">Comcast Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/comcast-corporation/cmcsa/nas">CMCSA</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-cable-inc/twc/nys">Time Warner Cable Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-cable-inc/twc/nys">TWC</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">Intel Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">INTC</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>).</li>
    <li>According to people familiar with the matter, Robert Verrone, one of the most zealous commercial real-estate lenders during the industry's boom, will leave <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wachovia-corporation/wb/nys">Wachovia Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wachovia-corporation/wb/nys">WB</a>) within the next week, the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121011756316572337.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news"><em>Wall Street Journal </em></a>reported.</li>
</ul>
<strong>WEB SITES:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aNHEUuWKtL_M&amp;refer=home"><em>Bloomberg</em></a> reported that the Department of Justice is probing whether <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ubs-ag-switzerland/ubs/nys">UBS AG</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ubs-ag-switzerland/ubs/nys">UBS</a>) helped clients evade American taxes. In an e-mailed statement, the firm said one senior bank employee was "briefly detained" by authorities.</li>
    <li><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=atl3yFmV508A"><em>Bloomberg</em></a> also reported that Vallejo, California's city council voted to go into bankruptcy. Officials said that after talks with labor unions failed to win salary concessions from police and fire fighters, the city does not have enough money to pay its bills.</li>
    <li>According to a rumor, <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/06/is-yang-still-in-control-at-yahoo/"><em>TechCrunch</em></a> reported that the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) board of directors yesterday authorized Yahoo chairman Roy Bostock, rather than CEO Jerry Yang, to call <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) CEO Steve Ballmer about re-starting negotiations.</li>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/07/newspaper-wap-up-tech-firms-to-invest-in-wireless/">Newspaper wap-up: Tech firms to invest in wireless</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 07 May 2008 08:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/07/newspaper-wap-up-tech-firms-to-invest-in-wireless/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1188667/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/07/newspaper-wap-up-tech-firms-to-invest-in-wireless/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bankruptcy</category><category>Clearwire</category><category>CLWR</category><category>CMCSA</category><category>CMCSK</category><category>Comcast</category><category>Department of Justice</category><category>DepartmentOfJustice</category><category>GOOG</category><category>GOogle</category><category>INTC</category><category>Intel</category><category>Jerry Yang</category><category>JerryYang</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>probe</category><category>S</category><category>Sprint</category><category>sprint nextel</category><category>sprint nextel wimax</category><category>SprintNextel</category><category>SprintNextelWimax</category><category>Steve Ballmer</category><category>SteveBallmer</category><category>Time Warner Cable</category><category>TimeWarnerCable</category><category>TWC</category><category>UBS</category><category>UBS AG</category><category>UbsAg</category><category>Vallejo</category><category>Wachovia</category><category>WB</category><category>WiMax</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Laurie Pasternack]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 08:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The brilliance of Steve Ballmer and the uncertain future of Yahoo!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/06/the-brilliance-of-steve-ballmer-and-the-uncertain-future-of-yaho/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/06/the-brilliance-of-steve-ballmer-and-the-uncertain-future-of-yaho/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/06/the-brilliance-of-steve-ballmer-and-the-uncertain-future-of-yaho/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p>The dust is settling after the withdrawn purchase offer of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>). During that fascinating process, speculation ran high as to why Steve Ballmer chose the strategy that he did. People were asking what the probable outcomes could be and what would possibly be created by the acquisition. What I have found to be lacking in the realm of the public keyboard is a synopsis of what exactly Steve Ballmer has accomplished through this seemingly fruitless process.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/06/the-brilliance-of-steve-ballmer-and-the-uncertain-future-of-yaho/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The brilliance of Steve Ballmer and the uncertain future of Yahoo!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/06/the-brilliance-of-steve-ballmer-and-the-uncertain-future-of-yaho/">The brilliance of Steve Ballmer and the uncertain future of Yahoo!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 06 May 2008 17:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080505/bs_nm/yahoo_dc>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/06/the-brilliance-of-steve-ballmer-and-the-uncertain-future-of-yaho/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1187886/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/06/the-brilliance-of-steve-ballmer-and-the-uncertain-future-of-yaho/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Jerry Yang</category><category>JerryYang</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Steve Ballmer</category><category>SteveBallmer</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 17:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ballmer wimps out]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/05/ballmer-wimps-out/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/05/ballmer-wimps-out/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/05/ballmer-wimps-out/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/orcl/" rel="tag">Oracle Corp (ORCL)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/steve-ballmer-msft.jpg" />I was convinced that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) would go hostile on <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>). Microsoft is known as a tough player, right? And Yahoo seems to be a good strategic fit.</p>
<p>But of course, Microsoft's CEO, Steve Ballmer, has <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aDnk8NZHUQKo&amp;refer=home">thrown in the towel</a> on the $31 buyout offer. Apparently, he lobbed $33 per share - but the folks at Yahoo wanted $4 extra.</p>
<p>I can certainly understand why Ballmer doesn't want to overpay. After all, many M&amp;A studies show that this is often deadly for dealmaking.</p>
<p>At the same time, Microsoft had the option of a proxy fight and a direct offer to Yahoo shareholders. However, Ballmer thought such things would be too distracting. But doesn't Microsoft have legions of attorneys and investment bankers?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/05/ballmer-wimps-out/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ballmer wimps out</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/05/ballmer-wimps-out/">Ballmer wimps out</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 05 May 2008 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aDnk8NZHUQKo&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/05/ballmer-wimps-out/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1186208/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/05/ballmer-wimps-out/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>Hostile Takeover</category><category>HostileTakeover</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Jerry Yang</category><category>JerryYang</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Steve Ballmer</category><category>SteveBallmer</category><category>Yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo CEO Yang sells out -- shareholders that is]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/05/yahoo-ceo-yang-sells-out-shareholders-that-is/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/05/yahoo-ceo-yang-sells-out-shareholders-that-is/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/05/yahoo-ceo-yang-sells-out-shareholders-that-is/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nasdaq/" rel="tag">NASDAQ</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/yhoo-yahoo%21-logo.jpg" />Once again investors get left holding the bag.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) shareholders should breathe a sigh of relief for not overpaying for an internet search company, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) where CEO Jerry Yang let his ego get in the way of handsome profits. Yang rejected the $47.5 billion offer that Microsoft put on the table. Why? Because he thought the company is worth more than $50 billion. As reported by the <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/yahoo-ceo-is-now-on-the-hot-seat/20080501210809990001">AP</a>: "Clearly there's frustration," said Darren Chervitz, co-manager of the Jacob Internet Fund, which owns Yahoo stock. "I am not even sure if Yahoo cares about its shareholders because they didn't show much regard for shareholders' best interests in this process." <br /></p>
<p>Yang actually thinks that a more sophisticated advertising platform is the secret sauce needed to produce a spike in revenue growth. Keep in mind that revenue grew by only 12% last year, and there is no indication that that number is going to be much higher in '08. Yang thinks that he will be able to grow revenue's by 25 percent in 2009 and 2010. Uh Huh! </p>
<p>I think that today's selloff in Yahoo stock will be an indication of what the public thinks of Yang's plan. </p>
<p>Could it be that in the long run he will be proved correct? I doubt it but only time will tell.</p>
<p><em>Aaron Katsman is the lead Portfolio Manager and Managing Director of America Israel Investment Associates, LLC. and Senior Editor of </em><a href="http://www.israelnewsletter.com/"><em>IsraelNewsletter.com</em></a><em>. DISCLOSURE: Writer's fund has no position in any stock mentioned, as of 5/5/08.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/05/yahoo-ceo-yang-sells-out-shareholders-that-is/">Yahoo CEO Yang sells out -- shareholders that is</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 05 May 2008 08:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/yahoo-ceo-is-now-on-the-hot-seat/20080501210809990001>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/05/yahoo-ceo-yang-sells-out-shareholders-that-is/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1186459/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/05/yahoo-ceo-yang-sells-out-shareholders-that-is/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Internet advertising</category><category>InternetAdvertising</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Jerry Yang</category><category>ma</category><category>microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>shareholders</category><category>Steve Ballmer</category><category>SteveBallmer</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Katsman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 08:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will Ballmer raise his Yahoo offer by $3?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/will-ballmer-raise-his-yahoo-offer-by-3/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/will-ballmer-raise-his-yahoo-offer-by-3/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/will-ballmer-raise-his-yahoo-offer-by-3/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p>The <em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/01/technology/01soft.html?ref=business">New York Times</a></em> reports that <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a></strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) CEO Steve Ballmer may raise his bid for <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo Inc.</a></strong> (NASDAQ: YHOO) to $32.</p>
<p>That number may not be enough. Currently, Yahoo is valued at $29.06 a share but Microsoft is considering an offer in the $32 or $33 range. However, that's short of the $35 to $37 range that Yahoo shareholders want for their holdings.</p>
<p>Yahoo continues to hold out hope for remaining independent, including a combination with the BloggingStocks parent, AOL, a unit of <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc-new/twx/nys">Time Warner</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc-new/twx/nys">TWX</a>) and a search advertising partnership with <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a></strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>). And so the drama continues.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em><font color="#0072bc">Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</font></em></a><em>.</em><em> He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em><font color="#0072bc">teaches management at Babson College</font></em></a><em> and edits </em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em><font color="#0072bc">The Cohan Letter</font></em></a><em>. He has no financial interest in the securities mentioned.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/will-ballmer-raise-his-yahoo-offer-by-3/">Will Ballmer raise his Yahoo offer by $3?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 01 May 2008 08:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/01/technology/01soft.html?ref=business>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/will-ballmer-raise-his-yahoo-offer-by-3/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1183054/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/will-ballmer-raise-his-yahoo-offer-by-3/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AOL</category><category>goog</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Steve Ballmer</category><category>SteveBallmer</category><category>TWX</category><category>Yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 08:27:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft vs Yahoo!: Knowing when to back off]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/28/microsoft-vs-yahoo-knowing-when-to-back-off/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/28/microsoft-vs-yahoo-knowing-when-to-back-off/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/28/microsoft-vs-yahoo-knowing-when-to-back-off/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/microsoft-yahoo.jpg" alt="" />Discretion is the better part of valor</em> -- that's what I was always taught. Perhaps the time for a strategic withdrawal has come in the battle of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) vs <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>). Somehow, though, I can't imagine it will take that turn, as I read the analysts, strategists and pundits. How could it have become so adversarial? Surely something ugly may be at hand.<br /><br />Did Steve Ballmer envision this type of scenario when launching his original bid for Yahoo? Did he ever imagine the attempted synergy would become a battle of wills as much as money? To what degree does pride factor into this pending recipe for disaster? I dare say that is what it has all come down to now. <em>Pride goes before a fall</em>, they say.<br /><br />Does Steve Ballmer have the grace within him to fold his tents and quietly withdraw? Or shall his siege works be lain against the walls of Yahoo in an attempt to forcibly take it? Already he has warned that he will appeal to the sensibilities of Yahoo's investor rank and file. It's a tactic which has been used in many a war. However, attempting to romance the populace away from their leaders seldom, if ever, has worked. In the meantime, Microsoft's own shares are on the decline, diluting the strength of its acceptable offer.<br /><br />I submit to you that at this time Microsoft should disengage from the situation entirely. Giving Yahoo some time to fully digest the reality of what it is facing might be a worthwhile strategy. To force the matter any further right now may only lead to the degradation of the reputations of both companies. That is something that no one desires. <br /><br />The powerful silence emanating from an adversary which has quietly withdrawn places nothing but unanswerable questions on the horizon.<br /><br /><em>Gary Sattler is a freelance blogger. He does not knowingly have interest in the companies mentioned in this blog post.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/28/microsoft-vs-yahoo-knowing-when-to-back-off/">Microsoft vs Yahoo!: Knowing when to back off</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.moneyweb.co.za/mw/view/mw/en/page38?oid=205103&amp;sn=Detail>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/28/microsoft-vs-yahoo-knowing-when-to-back-off/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1179095/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/28/microsoft-vs-yahoo-knowing-when-to-back-off/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>acquisition</category><category>buyout</category><category>featured</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Steve Ballmer</category><category>SteveBallmer</category><category>take over</category><category>TakeOver</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:05:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
