<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[YouTube goes long]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/19/youtube-goes-long/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/19/youtube-goes-long/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/19/youtube-goes-long/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/youtube-goog.gif" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href=""http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas"">GOOG</a>) wants to see if the attention span of its YouTube users can be stretched a bit. According to this <em>Fortune </em><a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/06/17/technology/youtube_long_videos.fortune/index.htm">article</a>, YouTube seems to think that short clips might not necessarily be the backbone of long-term growth. Instead, longer videos might make the site more valuable. Why is this? Well, the article intimates that the founders of the site, Chad Hurley and Steve Chen, think there's a market out there that might want something more than simple, user-generated content that focuses on the banal side of life for about three minutes per clip. </p>
<p>I see the point here. Google wants to figure out, once and for all, the best way to monetize its YouTube investment. This isn't the easiest thing to do, since users of YouTube are, in theory, only interested in seeing short content as fast as possible. They don't want to be burdened by ads. But YouTube is betting that maybe, just maybe, by going against theory and putting on longer material of better quality, the eyeballs will become more intrigued and will perhaps be willing to view a greater quantity of videos. It all comes down to the quality of the content.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/19/youtube-goes-long/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>YouTube goes long</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/19/youtube-goes-long/">YouTube goes long</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:26:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2008/06/17/technology/youtube_long_videos.fortune/index.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/19/youtube-goes-long/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1229542/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/19/youtube-goes-long/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Chad Hurley</category><category>ChadHurley</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>featured</category><category>Francis Stokes</category><category>FrancisStokes</category><category>Google</category><category>Julie Supan</category><category>JulieSupan</category><category>social networking</category><category>SocialNetworking</category><category>Steve Chen</category><category>SteveChen</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><category>YouTube</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:26:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[How to build the next YouTube: Five lessons from the Google deal]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/12/how-to-build-the-next-youtube-five-lessons-from-the-google-deal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/12/how-to-build-the-next-youtube-five-lessons-from-the-google-deal/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/12/how-to-build-the-next-youtube-five-lessons-from-the-google-deal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p><p> </p>
<p><img id="vimage_1" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/youtube.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />At first blush the news that YouTube, the remarkably successful video-sharing Web site, would be <a href="http://articles.news.aol.com/business/_a/dot-com-boom-echoed-in-deal-to-buy/20061010121609990002">bought by Google for no less than $1.65 billion in stock</a>, seemed like more back-to-the-future dot-com nonsense. The stock market is at a new record high, just like in early 2000. And a year-old start-up with no revenues and just 60 employees is selling for a billion-plus. How circa-1999!</p>
<p>But you can't chalk YouTube's success up to to bubblicious times. There are clear reasons why YouTube has commanded a super-sized valuations. And the reasons aren't rocket science. They are <a href="http://smallbusiness.aol.com/start/startup/article/_a/watching-youtube/20061012165509990001">good business practice that any startup can seek to emulate</a>.</p>
<p>Here are five lessons we can all learn from Google's success:</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>First, figure out what matters most to the success of your business and make that your top priority</strong>. For YouTube, it was building audience. Revenues didn't matter, profits even less. What mattered was that visitors were viewing 100 million video clips a day. YouTube founders now have to help Google <a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/business/15729977.htm">figure out how to make money from all that traffic without alienating users</a>, but that has turned out to be a Stage Two problem -- after the big pay day.</p>
<p><strong>Don't let legal worries be too much of an impediment</strong>. <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/12/google-ceo-eric-schmidt-vs-media-pundit-mark-cuban/">Marc Cuban and other Web pundits</a> have been fretting over YouTube's potential legal liability for copyright violations on its site. Now that's soon going to be Google's problem. But for YouTube's founders, who lacked deep pockets, the risk of major lawsuit was kept at bay simply by them being responsive and taking down content when copyright-holders objected. Maybe they got lucky. But it's clear, if they had spent too much time consulting lawyers, rather than building the site, YouTube would have never gotten off the ground.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/12/how-to-build-the-next-youtube-five-lessons-from-the-google-deal/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>How to build the next YouTube: Five lessons from the Google deal</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/12/how-to-build-the-next-youtube-five-lessons-from-the-google-deal/">How to build the next YouTube: Five lessons from the Google deal</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Oct 2006 17:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://smallbusiness.aol.com/start/startup/article/_a/watching-youtube/20061012165509990001>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/12/how-to-build-the-next-youtube-five-lessons-from-the-google-deal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/683182/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/12/how-to-build-the-next-youtube-five-lessons-from-the-google-deal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Chad Hurley</category><category>ChadHurley</category><category>Marc Cuban</category><category>MarcCuban</category><category>Steve Chen</category><category>SteveChen</category><category>YouTube</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Amey Stone]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 17:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Riches, sense of pride not enough for 3rd YouTube founder]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/12/riches-sense-of-pride-not-enough-for-3rd-youtube-founder/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/12/riches-sense-of-pride-not-enough-for-3rd-youtube-founder/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/12/riches-sense-of-pride-not-enough-for-3rd-youtube-founder/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p><p><img id="vimage_1" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/jawed_karim_cnbc.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Jawed Karim is supplying one answer to the question, "what if one of the market's biggest success stories was your idea... but no one knew your name?" For him, the answer is, "tell everyone!"</p>
<p>Karim <a href="http://articles.news.aol.com/business/_a/surprise-theres-a-third-youtube-co/20061012071809990001">was a co-founder of YouTube</a>, along with Chad Hurley and Steve Chen. The general concept for the site, he says, was all his. But he stepped back from day-to-day involvement once the company became formal enough to have job titles, opting instead to embrace the student lifestyle once again. Once he went back to Stanford, he "advised" YouTube while his former PayPal colleagues did most of the legwork.</p>
<p>When Google, Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG) came a-knocking, Karim wasn't involved at all, although it seems as if he's going to benefit from the $1.7 billion price tag; he <em>did </em>retain an ownership stake in YouTube.</p>
<p>So now Karim has money (twice over, as all three co-founders made money when PayPal was bought by eBay, Inc. in 2002). He has that sense of pride and personal satisfaction that you must feel when your brainchild is considered and found a-billion-and-change-worth of worthy by the market. What he doesn't have, though, is fame.</p>
<p>Why don't you make a movie about it, Karim? You <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8ehi7Eyg5k">could put it on this thing called YouTube</a> ...</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/12/riches-sense-of-pride-not-enough-for-3rd-youtube-founder/">Riches, sense of pride not enough for 3rd YouTube founder</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Oct 2006 17:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/12/riches-sense-of-pride-not-enough-for-3rd-youtube-founder/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/683993/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/12/riches-sense-of-pride-not-enough-for-3rd-youtube-founder/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chad hurly</category><category>ChadHurly</category><category>chen</category><category>co-founder</category><category>co-founders of youtube</category><category>Co-foundersOfYoutube</category><category>deal</category><category>founder</category><category>founder of youtube</category><category>FounderOfYoutube</category><category>google</category><category>hurley</category><category>jawed karim</category><category>JawedKarim</category><category>karim</category><category>ownership</category><category>ownership stake</category><category>OwnershipStake</category><category>paypal</category><category>steve chen</category><category>SteveChen</category><category>youtube</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 17:01:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
