<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Inadequate Q4 U.S. GDP Growth Points to Fed's Extension of QE2]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/27/inadequate-q4-u-s-gdp-growth-points-to-feds-extension-of-qe2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/27/inadequate-q4-u-s-gdp-growth-points-to-feds-extension-of-qe2/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/27/inadequate-q4-u-s-gdp-growth-points-to-feds-extension-of-qe2/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/03/federal-reserve-bldg-1268425618.jpg"  alt="Federal Reserve" />This past week's data point of significance for investors has to be the revised, final, fourth quarter U.S. GDP report, which indicated the world's largest economy <a href="http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/national/gdp/gdpnewsrelease.htm">grew 3.1%</a> in the quarter, as well as 2.9% for 2010. </p>
<p>In 2009, the U.S. economy contracted 2.6% during the Great Recession -- the worst downturn since the Great Depression -- and even though the final 3.1% fourth quarter stat was better than the 2.8% previously estimated fourth quarter growth rate, the growth pace still is not strong enough.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/27/inadequate-q4-u-s-gdp-growth-points-to-feds-extension-of-qe2/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Inadequate Q4 U.S. GDP Growth Points to Fed's Extension of QE2</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/27/inadequate-q4-u-s-gdp-growth-points-to-feds-extension-of-qe2/">Inadequate Q4 U.S. GDP Growth Points to Fed's Extension of QE2</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 27 Mar 2011 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/27/inadequate-q4-u-s-gdp-growth-points-to-feds-extension-of-qe2/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19892857/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/27/inadequate-q4-u-s-gdp-growth-points-to-feds-extension-of-qe2/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic growth</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>GDP</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job creation</category><category>jobs</category><category>Q4 GDP</category><category>QE2</category><category>quantitative easing</category><category>stimulus</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bernanke Denies Causing Inflation]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/04/bernanke-denies-causing-inflation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/04/bernanke-denies-causing-inflation/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/04/bernanke-denies-causing-inflation/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="Ben Bernanke" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/11/bernanke-1-1290544030.jpg" />Is Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke stoking inflation? Of course he is. Anyone with common sense knows that if you give $600 billion cash to the banks with no qualifications -- as he did with the second round of quantitative easing -- they will use it to speculate in the markets. JPMorgan Chase (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys" class="inlinked">JPM</a>) just bought <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/13/copper-sets-new-record-high/">$1 billion of copper</a>.</p>
<p>Bernanke's fatal mistake was that he placed no restrictions on what the banks would do with his $600 billion. If you opened the banks' books, you can bet that they've invested in commodities, currencies and foreign equities and bonds.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/04/bernanke-denies-causing-inflation/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bernanke Denies Causing Inflation</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/04/bernanke-denies-causing-inflation/">Bernanke Denies Causing Inflation</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 04 Feb 2011 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/04/bernanke-denies-causing-inflation/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19828344/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/04/bernanke-denies-causing-inflation/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ben Bernanke</category><category>Bernanke inflation</category><category>featured</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>inflation</category><category>inthenews</category><category>JPM</category><category>JPMorgan Chase</category><category>QE2</category><category>stimulus</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bill Gross Opines on 2011]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/06/bill-gross-opines-on-2011/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/06/bill-gross-opines-on-2011/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/06/bill-gross-opines-on-2011/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a></p><p><img width="240" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="157" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/pimco-logo.jpg" />Bond money managers are usually glum. Then again, they need to be cautious since they are locking up money at fixed rate of returns. In a volatile world, this can certainly be a risky proposition.</p>
<p>So it should be no surprise that the biggest bond money manager, Bill Gross, is not enthusiastic about 2011. He leads the Pacific Investment Management Co., which has $1.2 trillion under management.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/06/bill-gross-opines-on-2011/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bill Gross Opines on 2011</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/06/bill-gross-opines-on-2011/">Bill Gross Opines on 2011</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 06 Jan 2011 13:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/06/bill-gross-opines-on-2011/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19789765/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/06/bill-gross-opines-on-2011/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bill Gross</category><category>Brazil</category><category>commodities</category><category>deficit</category><category>emerging markets</category><category>inflation</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Mexico</category><category>PIMCO</category><category>stimulus</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 13:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bleak Prospects for Further Economic Growth]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/22/bleak-prospects-for-further-economic-growth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/22/bleak-prospects-for-further-economic-growth/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/22/bleak-prospects-for-further-economic-growth/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/11/gary-shilling-240-x-160-1289512326.jpg" alt="" />In projecting U.S. GDP growth at about a 2% rate for the remainder of this year and in 2011, I have noted that the two propellants of growth so far in this economic recovery -- the inventory revival and fiscal stimuli -- are largely exhausted. </p>
<p>But are there other sectors of the <a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/category/economy/">economy</a> that might serve as the backbone of any meaningful economic recovery? I don't see any, especially with U.S. consumers continuing their saving spree, repaying debts and remaining hesitant to spend like they did during the boom times of earlier years.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/22/bleak-prospects-for-further-economic-growth/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bleak Prospects for Further Economic Growth</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/22/bleak-prospects-for-further-economic-growth/">Bleak Prospects for Further Economic Growth</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/22/bleak-prospects-for-further-economic-growth/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19772995/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/22/bleak-prospects-for-further-economic-growth/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer spending</category><category>economy</category><category>exports</category><category>featured</category><category>gdp</category><category>housing inventory</category><category>productivity</category><category>recovery</category><category>stimulus</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Shilling]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bernanke on 60 Minutes: We Could Have QE3]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/04/bernanke-on-60-minutes-qe3/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/04/bernanke-on-60-minutes-qe3/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/04/bernanke-on-60-minutes-qe3/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="Ben Bernanke" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/04/bernanke3.jpg" />Federal Reserve Chairman <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2010/12/03/news/economy/ben_bernanke_60_minutes/index.htm">Ben Bernanke will appear on <em>60 Minutes</em></a> this Sunday to defend his controversial stimulus package, dubbed QE2, of buying $600 billion of Treasury securities.</p>
<p>In the CBS interview, Bernanke explains his intentions with QE2 and defends the notion that this stimulus will not lead to inflation. He also told CBS that he is not ruling out the purchase of more securities.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/04/bernanke-on-60-minutes-qe3/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bernanke on 60 Minutes: We Could Have QE3</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/04/bernanke-on-60-minutes-qe3/">Bernanke on 60 Minutes: We Could Have QE3</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 04 Dec 2010 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/04/bernanke-on-60-minutes-qe3/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19746229/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/04/bernanke-on-60-minutes-qe3/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>60 Minutes</category><category>Benanke on QE2</category><category>Bernanke</category><category>Bernanke on 60 Minutes</category><category>Bernanke on inflation</category><category>CBS</category><category>featured</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GS</category><category>inflation</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Jan Hatzius</category><category>QE2</category><category>QE3</category><category>quantitative easing</category><category>stimulus</category><category>U.S. dollar</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bernanke Says He Does Not Want to Create Inflation]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/07/bernanke-says-he-does-not-want-to-create-inflation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/07/bernanke-says-he-does-not-want-to-create-inflation/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/07/bernanke-says-he-does-not-want-to-create-inflation/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/currency/" rel="tag">Currency</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/10/rszgyi0061867992.jpg"  alt="Bernanke" /><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6A44EL20101106">Reuters</a> quoted Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke as saying: "We're not in the business of trying to create inflation. Our purpose is to provide additional stimulus to help the <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/category/economy/" class="inlinked">economy</a> recover and to avoid potentially additional disinflation, which I think we'll all agree could also be worrisome."</p>
<p>Bernanke claims that inflation is below the Fed's 2% target. That's hogwash! Sure if you use the "core" CPI, which leaves out food and energy, that may be the case. Not to worry.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/07/bernanke-says-he-does-not-want-to-create-inflation/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bernanke Says He Does Not Want to Create Inflation</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/07/bernanke-says-he-does-not-want-to-create-inflation/">Bernanke Says He Does Not Want to Create Inflation</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 07 Nov 2010 11:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/07/bernanke-says-he-does-not-want-to-create-inflation/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19705954/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/07/bernanke-says-he-does-not-want-to-create-inflation/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bernanke</category><category>commodities</category><category>core CPI</category><category>corn</category><category>cotton</category><category>dollar</category><category>energy</category><category>featured</category><category>food prices</category><category>gasoline</category><category>gold</category><category>inflation</category><category>inthenews</category><category>oil</category><category>silver</category><category>soybeans</category><category>stimulus</category><category>sugar</category><category>wheat</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2010 11:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why Is the Fed Doing Another Round of Stimulus?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/01/federal-reserve-qe2-stimulus-quantitative-easing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/01/federal-reserve-qe2-stimulus-quantitative-easing/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/01/federal-reserve-qe2-stimulus-quantitative-easing/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="Federal Reserve seal"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/11/federalreserveseal.jpg" />Almost everybody believes the Federal Reserve is about to implement another round of stimulus. And the reasons cited in favor of such a move are many. One argument put forth is a fear of deflation, as reported in the article by <a href="http://finance.fortune.cnn.com/2010/10/13/qe2-why-is-the-fed-doing-this/">CNNMoney/Fortune</a>. Well, with GDP at 2% for the last quarter, the economy is slow, but it is not sinking into deflation.</p>
<p>Then what is the Fed up to? Why do another round of stimulus? Let's try this argument. The plans are to print perhaps another trillion dollars by buying Treasuries. When the Fed buys Treasuries, the money goes directly to the bankers. The $64,000 question is why give all this money to the bankers?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/01/federal-reserve-qe2-stimulus-quantitative-easing/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Why Is the Fed Doing Another Round of Stimulus?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/01/federal-reserve-qe2-stimulus-quantitative-easing/">Why Is the Fed Doing Another Round of Stimulus?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 01 Nov 2010 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/01/federal-reserve-qe2-stimulus-quantitative-easing/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19696003/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/01/federal-reserve-qe2-stimulus-quantitative-easing/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>federal reserve</category><category>inthenews</category><category>monetary stimulus</category><category>qe2</category><category>quantitative easing</category><category>stimulus</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fed's Evans: The U.S. Is in a Liquidity Trap]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/17/feds-evans-the-u-s-is-in-a-liquidity-trap/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/17/feds-evans-the-u-s-is-in-a-liquidity-trap/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/17/feds-evans-the-u-s-is-in-a-liquidity-trap/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" height="160" width="213" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/fedres-logo.jpg" />Here's a shocker!. Chicago Fed President Charles Evans claims that the U.S. is an a bona fide liquidity trap! His remarks were given in a speech to the Boston Fed and reported in the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704706904575556283044368588.html?mod=WSJ_hps_LEFTWhatsNews"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a>. In attendance were Fed employees, academics and Wall Streeters.</p>
<p>Evans is proposing a radical departure from established Fed policy, which is to maintain price stability and maximum sustainable employment. Here it is! <em>He wants to foster above-target inflation for a time!</em></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/17/feds-evans-the-u-s-is-in-a-liquidity-trap/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fed's Evans: The U.S. Is in a Liquidity Trap</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/17/feds-evans-the-u-s-is-in-a-liquidity-trap/">Fed's Evans: The U.S. Is in a Liquidity Trap</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 17 Oct 2010 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/17/feds-evans-the-u-s-is-in-a-liquidity-trap/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19676926/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/17/feds-evans-the-u-s-is-in-a-liquidity-trap/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank bailouts</category><category>Charles Evans</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>inflation</category><category>inthenews</category><category>liquidity trap</category><category>stimulus</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fed in a Quandary About How to Explain QE2]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/08/fed-struggles-to-explain-qe2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/08/fed-struggles-to-explain-qe2/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/08/fed-struggles-to-explain-qe2/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/12/fed_240.jpg" alt="Federal Reserve" />The U.S. Federal Reserve is in a quandary about how to explain its anticipated quantitative easing stimulus, dubbed QE2. Officials worry that an added stimulus will create unwanted inflation.</p>
<p>Fed officials Charles Evans and William Dudley have spoken in favor of the new stimulus. Dudley told the <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1f4fcf26-d238-11df-8fbe-00144feabdc0.html"><em>Financial Times</em></a> that asset purchases and communication are "two potentially complimentary avenues."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/08/fed-struggles-to-explain-qe2/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fed in a Quandary About How to Explain QE2</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/08/fed-struggles-to-explain-qe2/">Fed in a Quandary About How to Explain QE2</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 08 Oct 2010 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/08/fed-struggles-to-explain-qe2/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19665867/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/08/fed-struggles-to-explain-qe2/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bernanke</category><category>Charles Evans</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>inthenews</category><category>QE2</category><category>quantitative easing</category><category>stimulus</category><category>William Dudley</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. Fiscal Deficit Just Below $1.3 Trillion]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/08/u-s-fiscal-deficit-just-below-1-3-trillion/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/08/u-s-fiscal-deficit-just-below-1-3-trillion/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/08/u-s-fiscal-deficit-just-below-1-3-trillion/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/us-dollarnote-240.jpg" />For the 2010 fiscal year ending September 30, the Congressional Budget Office reported that the deficit is just below $1.3 trillion, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704696304575538553221675436.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_LEFTWhatsNewsCollection"><em>The Wall Street Journal</em></a> reported. In 2009, the deficit was $1.4 trillion. The deficit in fiscal 2010 is 8.9% of GDP, well above the normal number of 3%.<br />
<br />
With staggering deficits in 2009 and 2010, lawmakers will face a difficult task: how to rein in spending without derailing our fragile economy. Both parties must work together to find ways to keep spending in check.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/08/u-s-fiscal-deficit-just-below-1-3-trillion/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.S. Fiscal Deficit Just Below $1.3 Trillion</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/08/u-s-fiscal-deficit-just-below-1-3-trillion/">U.S. Fiscal Deficit Just Below $1.3 Trillion</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 08 Oct 2010 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704696304575538553221675436.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_LEFTWhatsNewsCollection>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/08/u-s-fiscal-deficit-just-below-1-3-trillion/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19665981/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/08/u-s-fiscal-deficit-just-below-1-3-trillion/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>deficit</category><category>economy</category><category>federal reesrve</category><category>fiscal deficit</category><category>inthenews</category><category>stimulus</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Philly Fed President: How Will QE2 Ease Unemployment?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/04/philly-fed-president-how-will-qe2-ease-unemployment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/04/philly-fed-president-how-will-qe2-ease-unemployment/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/04/philly-fed-president-how-will-qe2-ease-unemployment/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="Federal Reserve" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/federalreservebankofny.jpg" />There is growing debate over whether another round of quantitative easing (QE2) will ease unemployment.</p>
<p>In an interview with the <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1087d124-cf5d-11df-9be2-00144feab49a.html"><em>Financial Times</em></a>, Philadelphia Fed President Charles Plosser set out guidelines for more stimulus. He said: "I think that before we engage in further quantitative easing, we need to be very clear about what it is we are trying to do, how we're going to go about doing it, how we're going to measure whether we're effective at it or not, and how we're going to communicate that."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/04/philly-fed-president-how-will-qe2-ease-unemployment/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Philly Fed President: How Will QE2 Ease Unemployment?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/04/philly-fed-president-how-will-qe2-ease-unemployment/">Philly Fed President: How Will QE2 Ease Unemployment?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 04 Oct 2010 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/04/philly-fed-president-how-will-qe2-ease-unemployment/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19659474/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/04/philly-fed-president-how-will-qe2-ease-unemployment/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ben Bernanke</category><category>Charles Plosser</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>inthenews</category><category>QE2</category><category>quantitative easing</category><category>stimulus</category><category>unemployment</category><category>William Dudley</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why Would Any Country Buy U.S. Treasuries?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/03/japan-buys-u-s-treasuries/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/03/japan-buys-u-s-treasuries/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/03/japan-buys-u-s-treasuries/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="U.S. Federal Reserve" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/03/federal-reserve-bldg-1268425618.jpg" />The world of international finance is a complex web. The U.S. is still the powerhouse when it comes to gross domestic product. Yet, while perched on top of the heap, the U.S. faces major problems with high-level debt and unemployment.</p>
<p>The U.S. Federal Reserve is faced with having to issue massive amounts of debt just to keep pace with the growing deficits. Now the Fed is planning another round of stimulus by buying more treasuries, dubbed QE2.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/03/japan-buys-u-s-treasuries/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Why Would Any Country Buy U.S. Treasuries?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/03/japan-buys-u-s-treasuries/">Why Would Any Country Buy U.S. Treasuries?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 03 Oct 2010 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/03/japan-buys-u-s-treasuries/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19658559/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/03/japan-buys-u-s-treasuries/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bond market</category><category>bond prices</category><category>deflation</category><category>featured</category><category>Fed</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>inflation</category><category>interest rates</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Japan buying US treasuries</category><category>QE2</category><category>stimulus</category><category>Treasury bonds</category><category>U.S. treasuries</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[$12.2 Trillion Was Not Enough Stimulus]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/23/12-2-trillion-was-not-enough-stimulus/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/23/12-2-trillion-was-not-enough-stimulus/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/23/12-2-trillion-was-not-enough-stimulus/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="Federal Reserve" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/federalreserve-getty.jpg" />Developed countries are scrambling to put in place more rounds of stimulus to prop up their faltering economies.</p>
<p>The U.S. Federal Reserve has already pledged or spent an unbelievable $12.2 trillion to bail out a handful of bankers. The Fed slashed interest rates to zero and it is now purchasing more treasuries with proceeds from existing purchases. Finally, at its recent meeting the Fed stated that it stands ready to inject more stimulus in the <a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/category/economy/">economy</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/23/12-2-trillion-was-not-enough-stimulus/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>$12.2 Trillion Was Not Enough Stimulus</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/23/12-2-trillion-was-not-enough-stimulus/">$12.2 Trillion Was Not Enough Stimulus</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/23/12-2-trillion-was-not-enough-stimulus/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19645608/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/23/12-2-trillion-was-not-enough-stimulus/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>central banks</category><category>European Central Bank</category><category>featured</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job creation</category><category>stimulus</category><category>stimulus spending</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Gold Jumps to a New Record High]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/22/gold-jumps-to-a-new-record-high/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/22/gold-jumps-to-a-new-record-high/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/22/gold-jumps-to-a-new-record-high/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/agriculture/" rel="tag">Agriculture</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/currency/" rel="tag">Currency</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/01/gold.jpg"  alt="gold bars" />Gold prices jumped to a new record high as spot gold in London was fixed at $1,291.05. Traders interpreted the Federal Reserve's statement that it were ready to provide more stimulus as bullish for commodities, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE67F05920100922">Reuters reported</a>. <br />
<br />
More stimulus means printing more money. The U.S. dollar did not respond well at all. The December futures contract fell 0.65 to 80.20 (8:00 am EDT), which in turn had investors running for safe-haven assets such as gold and other commodities.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/22/gold-jumps-to-a-new-record-high/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Gold Jumps to a New Record High</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/22/gold-jumps-to-a-new-record-high/">Gold Jumps to a New Record High</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 22 Sep 2010 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE67F05920100922>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/22/gold-jumps-to-a-new-record-high/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19643863/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/22/gold-jumps-to-a-new-record-high/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>commodities</category><category>corn</category><category>currency</category><category>dollar</category><category>featured</category><category>federal reserve</category><category>gold</category><category>inthenews</category><category>oil</category><category>stimulus</category><category>wheat</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Household Wealth Falls by $1.5 Trillion in Q2]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/21/household-wealth-falls-in-q2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/21/household-wealth-falls-in-q2/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/21/household-wealth-falls-in-q2/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p>The Federal Reserve has posted some data that shows the extent of economic decline in the second quarter. Here are some key numbers, as reported by <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE68G3NT20100917">Reuters</a>.</p>
<ul>
    <li>Household wealth fell by $1.5 trillion in the second quarter to $53.5 trillion. This sharply lower than the $64.2 trillion at the end of 2007.</li>
    <li>Stock losses amounted to $14.9 trillion, a drop of $1.95 trillion.</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/21/household-wealth-falls-in-q2/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Household Wealth Falls by $1.5 Trillion in Q2</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/21/household-wealth-falls-in-q2/">Household Wealth Falls by $1.5 Trillion in Q2</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/21/household-wealth-falls-in-q2/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19642344/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/21/household-wealth-falls-in-q2/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer debt</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>household wealth</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mortgage debt</category><category>poverty</category><category>recession</category><category>stimulus</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[ECB President, Trichet, Says Cut Public Spending and Raise Taxes]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/23/trichet-says-raise-taxes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/23/trichet-says-raise-taxes/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/23/trichet-says-raise-taxes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="trichet calls for end of stimulus" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/05/ecb-logo.jpg" />Ben Bernanke, chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve, said on Thursday: "In the short term, I would believe that we should maintain a reasonable degree of fiscal support, stimulus for the economy."<br />
<br />
That was yesterday. Today, Friday,<a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b2c49986-95b5-11df-b5ad-00144feab49a.html"> Jean Claude Trichet, president of the European Central Bank</a>, in an editorial for the <em>Financial Times,</em> called for public spending cuts and tax increases immediately across the industrialized world. Prolonging the stimulus would have "very limited" effect on growth, he wrote.<br />
<br />
Trichet criticized the oversimplified message of fiscal stimulus -- "stimulate, activate, spend" -- given to all industrialized economies.<br />
<br />
In Europe, both manufacturing and services output in the eurozone grew faster than expected. The European Commission also said that consumer confidence was at its highest level in July for more than two years.<br />
<br />
When it comes to economic policy, it's difficult to plot the perfect path. Bernanke is an avid student of the 1930s depression and vows not to repeat the mistakes of that era. Trichet, on the other hand, is of the conservative European school of economics. He would prefer to err on the side of fiscal conservatism. Bernake would continue to use public money, if needed. He has already used <a href="http://money.cnn.com/news/storysupplement/economy/bailouttracker/">$11.2 trillion of taxpayer money to prop up U.S. bank.</a> The shift of this vast amount of money from taxpayers to the private banking sector is unprecedented in world history. Whether he should continue this policy is open to debate.<br />
<br />
Do you believe that Trichet is right to cut spending and raise taxes?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/23/trichet-says-raise-taxes/">ECB President, Trichet, Says Cut Public Spending and Raise Taxes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 23 Jul 2010 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/news/storysupplement/economy/bailouttracker/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b2c49986-95b5-11df-b5ad-00144feab49a.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/23/trichet-says-raise-taxes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19565845/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/23/trichet-says-raise-taxes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bernanke</category><category>end stimulus</category><category>European Central Bank</category><category>inthenews</category><category>raise taxes</category><category>stimulus</category><category>Trichet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Has China Averted a Real Estate Crash?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/11/has-china-averted-a-real-estate-crash/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/11/has-china-averted-a-real-estate-crash/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/11/has-china-averted-a-real-estate-crash/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/05/chineseflag.jpg" alt="" />On November 9, 2008, China initiated a $586 billion stimulus package aimed at soothing a national economy that was beginning to breed discontent. The program involved lowering credit restrictions, expanding social welfare programs, and a complement of infrastructure improvement incentives. Unfortunately, the program has worked quite well.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/09/AR2008110900701.html">The Chinese stimulus plan</a> created such a free flow of funds, people started buying second and third homes. The real estate market there began running full tilt. Construction entered a boom phase, aided by Olympic excitement. <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-05-10/china-april-home-prices-defy-curbs-with-record-jump-update1-.html">Real estate values went through the roof</a>.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/11/has-china-averted-a-real-estate-crash/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Has China Averted a Real Estate Crash?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/11/has-china-averted-a-real-estate-crash/">Has China Averted a Real Estate Crash?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 11 May 2010 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/11/has-china-averted-a-real-estate-crash/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19472074/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/11/has-china-averted-a-real-estate-crash/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cooling measures</category><category>cooling policies</category><category>export volume</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>real estate</category><category>real estate bubble</category><category>stimulus</category><category>stimulus plan</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[States Facing $90 Billion in Budget Shortfalls]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/05/states-facing-90-billion-in-budget-shortfalls/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/05/states-facing-90-billion-in-budget-shortfalls/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/05/states-facing-90-billion-in-budget-shortfalls/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/federalreserve-getty.jpg"  alt="" />The federal government with the help of the Federal Reserve has unlimited power to print money. Just ask chairman Bernanke who pledged $11.2 trillion dollars to bail out a handful of bankers.<br />
<br />
Then Congress pitched in with more stimulus money, which was intended mainly to create new jobs. However, states gobbled up a good portion to plug their budget deficits. Now that stimulus money has been used up. Unlike the federal government, state governments cannot print extra money to cover their shortfalls. They must balance their budgets.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/05/states-facing-90-billion-in-budget-shortfalls/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>States Facing $90 Billion in Budget Shortfalls</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/05/states-facing-90-billion-in-budget-shortfalls/">States Facing $90 Billion in Budget Shortfalls</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 05 May 2010 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2010/05/05/news/economy/state_budget_cuts/index.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/05/states-facing-90-billion-in-budget-shortfalls/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19465559/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/05/states-facing-90-billion-in-budget-shortfalls/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bernanke</category><category>federal reserve</category><category>inthenews</category><category>recession</category><category>stimulus</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fiscal Stimulus Helped Stabilize U.S. Economy]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/17/fiscal-stimulus-helped-stabilize-u-s-economy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/17/fiscal-stimulus-helped-stabilize-u-s-economy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/17/fiscal-stimulus-helped-stabilize-u-s-economy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/autoplant.jpg"  alt="" />A year into the U.S.'s record <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/recovery">$787 billion fiscal stimulus,</a> which will in fact total an $862 billion stimulus package, here's where the nation stands: <br />
<ul>
    <li>The free-fall in employment rolls has stopped. While the U.S. unemployment rate has risen to an unacceptable 9.7%, the unemployment rate would have been much higher without the roughly $800 billion in economic activity generated by the stimulus.</li>
    <li>Tens of thousands of local police officers, fire fighters, teachers, and other public service personnel have retained their jobs -- helping to stabilize the local economies where these civil servants work and live.</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/17/fiscal-stimulus-helped-stabilize-u-s-economy/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fiscal Stimulus Helped Stabilize U.S. Economy</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/17/fiscal-stimulus-helped-stabilize-u-s-economy/">Fiscal Stimulus Helped Stabilize U.S. Economy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 17 Feb 2010 04:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/17/fiscal-stimulus-helped-stabilize-u-s-economy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19362006/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/17/fiscal-stimulus-helped-stabilize-u-s-economy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>fiscal stimulus</category><category>Obama administration</category><category>stimulus</category><category>stimulus package</category><category>StimulusPackage</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 04:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ray of Light: G-7 Finance Ministers Vow to Maintain Stimulus]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/ray-of-light-g-7-finance-ministers-vow-to-maintain-stimulus/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/ray-of-light-g-7-finance-ministers-vow-to-maintain-stimulus/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/ray-of-light-g-7-finance-ministers-vow-to-maintain-stimulus/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/receessionpicutre.jpg"  alt="" />Monday's upbeat data point concerns the G-7, which agreed over the weekend to maintain economic stimulus measures, even as institutional investors (among others) start clamoring for nations to address large budget deficits. <br />
<br />
Meeting amid the frozen tundra of Iqaluit, Canada (as opposed to the almost equally frozen tundra of <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/local.html?hpid=artslot">Washington, D.C.</a>), Canada's Finance Minister Jim Flaherty said G-7 ministers "are mutually committed" to continuing stimulus, and will start looking at exit strategies after regional economies are on a sustainable growth track, Bloomberg News <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=aHNY95xmqjwM">reported Monday. </a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/ray-of-light-g-7-finance-ministers-vow-to-maintain-stimulus/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ray of Light: G-7 Finance Ministers Vow to Maintain Stimulus</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/ray-of-light-g-7-finance-ministers-vow-to-maintain-stimulus/">Ray of Light: G-7 Finance Ministers Vow to Maintain Stimulus</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/ray-of-light-g-7-finance-ministers-vow-to-maintain-stimulus/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19349647/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/08/ray-of-light-g-7-finance-ministers-vow-to-maintain-stimulus/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>G7</category><category>jim flaherty</category><category>JimFlaherty</category><category>stimulus</category><category>world economy</category><category>WorldEconomy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
