<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Chasing Value: Ten stocks for 2010 -- Part 4]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/chasing-value-ten-stocks-for-2010-part-4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/chasing-value-ten-stocks-for-2010-part-4/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/chasing-value-ten-stocks-for-2010-part-4/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fdx/" rel="tag">FedEx Corp (FDX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ups/" rel="tag">United Parcel'B' (UPS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfc/" rel="tag">Wells Fargo (WFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/" rel="tag">Chasing Value[TM]</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/etfc/" rel="tag">E*TRADE (ETFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ezpw/" rel="tag">EZCORP (EZPW)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/ford.jpg" />Fourteen stocks have been reviewed so far with eight of them potential contenders for 2010. These include some picks from 2009, some old dependables and a few more on the speculative side.<br /><br />During the year I have written on occasion about selling put options (naked puts) because the premiums offered were very generous and from my perspective assumed market collapse. This was reflected in my July post <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/31/serious-money-the-worlds-dumbest-market/" title="View Serious Money: The world's dumbest market on BloggingStocks" target="_blank">Serious Money: The world's dumbest market</a><br /><br />Today I am considering four naked puts and two more stocks. The options are all based on stocks now in review.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/chasing-value-ten-stocks-for-2010-part-4/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chasing Value: Ten stocks for 2010 -- Part 4</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/chasing-value-ten-stocks-for-2010-part-4/">Chasing Value: Ten stocks for 2010 -- Part 4</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/chasing-value-ten-stocks-for-2010-part-4/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19240501/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/chasing-value-ten-stocks-for-2010-part-4/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Chasing Value</category><category>ChasingValue</category><category>e-trade</category><category>ETFC</category><category>EZ Corp</category><category>EZ Pawn</category><category>EzCorp</category><category>EzPawn</category><category>EZPW</category><category>F</category><category>FDX</category><category>FedEx</category><category>Ford</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Stock options</category><category>StockOptions</category><category>stocks for 2010</category><category>StocksFor2010</category><category>United Parcel</category><category>UnitedParcel</category><category>Wells Fargo</category><category>WellsFargo</category><category>WFC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chasing Value: Favorite trades -- UPS]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/30/chasing-value-favorite-trades-ups/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/30/chasing-value-favorite-trades-ups/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/30/chasing-value-favorite-trades-ups/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ups/" rel="tag">United Parcel'B' (UPS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/" rel="tag">Chasing Value[TM]</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/best-stocks-for-2009/" rel="tag">Best Stocks for 2009</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/naked_city.jpg" alt="" />For those of you who are able to trade options, I have been writing more and more about <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/investor-fear-puts-me-naked-on-wall-street/">naked puts</a>, "selling to open" stock options that I have been doing all year with great returns due to an overabundance of fear.</p>
<p>Yesterday I reviewed one example in <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/29/chasing-value-ge-maybe-not-eating-out-of-trash-cans-after-all/">Chasing Value: GE -- maybe not eating out of trash cans after all</a>, and today I review some of my favorite ways to make money and improve my portfolio.</p>
<p>Let me start with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/united-parcel-service-cl-b/ups/nys">United Parcel Service Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/united-parcel-service-cl-b/ups/nys">UPS</a>), a company with a great balance sheet, strong management, and trading 29% off its 52-week high, about where I sold it last year. I bought it earlier this year at the bargain basement price of $44, and now wished I had bought more.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/30/chasing-value-favorite-trades-ups/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chasing Value: Favorite trades -- UPS</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/30/chasing-value-favorite-trades-ups/">Chasing Value: Favorite trades -- UPS</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/30/chasing-value-favorite-trades-ups/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19080682/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/30/chasing-value-favorite-trades-ups/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chasing value</category><category>dividends</category><category>featured</category><category>Naked Puts</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>stock options</category><category>StockOptions</category><category>United Parcel</category><category>UPS</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chasing Value: Has BNI become 'Berkshire' Northern Santa Fe]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/chasing-value-has-bni-become-berkshire-northern-santa-fe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/chasing-value-has-bni-become-berkshire-northern-santa-fe/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/chasing-value-has-bni-become-berkshire-northern-santa-fe/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ups/" rel="tag">United Parcel'B' (UPS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bargain-stocks/" rel="tag">Bargain Stocks</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/" rel="tag">Chasing Value[TM]</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bni/" rel="tag">Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/best-stocks-for-2009/" rel="tag">Best Stocks for 2009</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/freighttrain.jpg" alt="" />In reading recent stories that <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/28996116">Warren Buffett continues to increase his stake</a> in <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/burlington-northern-santa-fe-corporation/bni/nys">Burlington Northern Santa Fe</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/burlington-northern-santa-fe-corporation/bni/nys">BNI</a>) -- now standing at 22.4% -- I started to wonder if some day the name might be changed to <em>"Berkshire" Northern Santa Fe RR?</em><br /><br /><em>'My pal Warren'</em> is no doubt looking long term, and for most of the past two years has been up on <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-a/brk.a/nys">Berkshire Hathaway's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-cl-a/brk.a/nys">BRK.A</a>) BNI investment. However that is not the case today as his most recent purchase at $75.00 per share (not bought in the open market) is under water; the shares closed at $66.04, down 12%. He is losing even more on his average purchase price.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/chasing-value-has-bni-become-berkshire-northern-santa-fe/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chasing Value: Has BNI become 'Berkshire' Northern Santa Fe</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/chasing-value-has-bni-become-berkshire-northern-santa-fe/">Chasing Value: Has BNI become 'Berkshire' Northern Santa Fe</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/chasing-value-has-bni-become-berkshire-northern-santa-fe/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1458901/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/chasing-value-has-bni-become-berkshire-northern-santa-fe/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>berkshire hathaway</category><category>BerkshireHathaway</category><category>BNI</category><category>BRK.A</category><category>featured</category><category>JNJ</category><category>johnson and johnson</category><category>johnsonandjohnson</category><category>Naked puts</category><category>NakedPuts</category><category>Railroad</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>stock options</category><category>StockOptions</category><category>united parcel service</category><category>UnitedParcelService</category><category>UPS</category><category>value investing</category><category>ValueInvesting</category><category>Warren Buffett</category><category>WarrenBuffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Investor fear puts me 'naked' on Wall Street]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/investor-fear-puts-me-naked-on-wall-street/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/investor-fear-puts-me-naked-on-wall-street/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/investor-fear-puts-me-naked-on-wall-street/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ups/" rel="tag">United Parcel'B' (UPS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/best-stocks-for-2009/" rel="tag">Best Stocks for 2009</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/naked_city.jpg" alt="" />Right or wrong, I have been buying stocks on dips for the last five months, and the past two weeks I started adding naked puts to the mix on down days.<br /><br />In short (no pun intended), I am opening <em>an option to sell</em> a stock I do not own. These "naked puts" pay me cash on the first day to accept an obligation to buy a stock in the future at a predetermined price. If the stock is one cent or greater below the strike price, it gets "put to me" and I have to cover the position by buying the shares pledged.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/investor-fear-puts-me-naked-on-wall-street/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Investor fear puts me 'naked' on Wall Street</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/investor-fear-puts-me-naked-on-wall-street/">Investor fear puts me 'naked' on Wall Street</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/investor-fear-puts-me-naked-on-wall-street/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1460891/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/investor-fear-puts-me-naked-on-wall-street/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Dividends</category><category>featured</category><category>jnj</category><category>johnsonandjohnson</category><category>naked puts</category><category>NakedPuts</category><category>options</category><category>quality stocks</category><category>QualityStocks</category><category>sheldon liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>shorting stocks</category><category>ShortingStocks</category><category>stock options</category><category>StockOptions</category><category>united parcel service</category><category>UnitedParcelService</category><category>UPS</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[As Yahoo! hits a five-year low, bets about direction increase]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/as-yahoo-yhoo-hits-a-five-year-low-bets-about-direction-incr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/as-yahoo-yhoo-hits-a-five-year-low-bets-about-direction-incr/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/as-yahoo-yhoo-hits-a-five-year-low-bets-about-direction-incr/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/yhoo-yahoo!-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) yesterday posted its lowest price in nearly five years. The stock moved to $17.75, down from a 52-week high of $34.08.</p>
<p><em>The Wall Street Journal </em><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122057783023002173.html?mod=yahoo_hs&amp;ru=yahoo">pushed the idea</a> that this was an options play. "Trading in Yahoo options leapt to four times the normal level as investors picked up 168,000 calls that allow them to buy the company's stock." In other words, some traders are willing to gamble that the shares will go up.</p>
<p>But, they won't go up. There is growing evidence that marketers prefer search internet ads to display advertising. Yahoo! sells a great deal of display inventory and is a distant second to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">GOOG</a>) in search. Some of that may change as Yahoo! begins to use the Google system to create its search results.That may not offset the fact that Yahoo! probably has as much display advertising availability as any company in the world.</p>
<p>Because Yahoo! has shown it is unwilling to make major cost cuts, a flattening of its revenue growth would be a disaster for its investors. The firm's year-over-year sales improvement is already barely above 10%. What had been a growth stock three or four years ago has now become a buyout gamble. Investors still hang on to some hope that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) or a large media company will make an offer for the portal company.</p>
<p>That means that Yahoo! still carries a "takeover" premium, which begs the question of where the shares might trade at the end of the year, if there are no offers. Investors are gambling that there is a 30% chance that Yahoo! will be bought, if it is not, the stock heads toward $13.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/as-yahoo-yhoo-hits-a-five-year-low-bets-about-direction-incr/">As Yahoo! hits a five-year low, bets about direction increase</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 05 Sep 2008 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122057783023002173.html?mod=yahoo_hs&amp;ru=yahoo>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/as-yahoo-yhoo-hits-a-five-year-low-bets-about-direction-incr/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1305290/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/as-yahoo-yhoo-hits-a-five-year-low-bets-about-direction-incr/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>display advertising</category><category>DisplayAdvertising</category><category>GOOG</category><category>interent advertising</category><category>InterentAdvertising</category><category>inthenews</category><category>MSFT</category><category>options investing</category><category>OptionsInvesting</category><category>search</category><category>search advertising</category><category>SearchAdvertising</category><category>stock options</category><category>StockOptions</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Option Update: Yahoo volatility Elevated into EPS &amp; MSFT buyout efforts]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/21/option-update-yahoo-volatility-elevated-into-eps-and-msft-buyout/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/21/option-update-yahoo-volatility-elevated-into-eps-and-msft-buyout/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/21/option-update-yahoo-volatility-elevated-into-eps-and-msft-buyout/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas"><strong><img align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" /></strong><strong>Yahoo</strong></a> (NASDAQ-<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) closed at $28.43. Yahoo is scheduled to report earning on April 22. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">The Microsoft </a>(NASDAQ-<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) deadline for moving forward with a hostile takeover of Yahoo is April 26. Microsoft announced on Jan. 31 an offer for Yahoo payable in $31 cash, or 0.9509 per share. Yahoo May option implied volatility of 55 is above its 26-week average of 40, according to Track Data, suggesting larger price movement.</p>
<p><em>Options Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/21/option-update-yahoo-volatility-elevated-into-eps-and-msft-buyout/">Option Update: Yahoo volatility Elevated into EPS &amp; MSFT buyout efforts</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/21/option-update-yahoo-volatility-elevated-into-eps-and-msft-buyout/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1173095/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/21/option-update-yahoo-volatility-elevated-into-eps-and-msft-buyout/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>msft</category><category>option implied volatility</category><category>OptionImpliedVolatility</category><category>options</category><category>stock options</category><category>StockOptions</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Financial executives sitting on worthless options]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/20/financial-executives-sitting-on-worthless-options/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/20/financial-executives-sitting-on-worthless-options/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/20/financial-executives-sitting-on-worthless-options/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/insiders/" rel="tag">Insiders</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cfc/" rel="tag">Countrywide Financial (CFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bsc/" rel="tag">Bear Stearns Cos (BSC)</a></p>The significant declines in share prices at many of the big financial companies have left executives and employees in an unenviable position: many hold options that are <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120598561480051205.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing">badly out of the money</a> (subscription required) and, at companies like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-bear-stearns-companies-inc/bsc/nys">The Bear Stearns Companies, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-bear-stearns-companies-inc/bsc/nys">BSC</a>), have literally no chance of ever realizing any value.<br /><br />Executive pay consulting firm Steven Hall &amp; Partners reports that 55% of Fortune 500 financial services and insurance companies have options with an average strike price that puts them underwater. At <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/countrywide-financial-corporation/cfc/nys">Countrywide Financial Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/countrywide-financial-corporation/cfc/nys">CFC</a>), the current share price is about 86% lower than the weighted average strike price of the options held by employees.<br /><br />All of this presents an interesting executive compensation quandary: the purpose of options is to give executives an incentive that allows them to profit alongside shareholders. But options that are so out of the money as to be hopeless accomplish nothing. What effect might this have on performance? Activist investor Daniel Loeb opined on this very issue <a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1002590/000089914005000128/t2774169.txt">in a letter</a> to Star Gas Partners CEO Irik Sevin back in 2005:<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/20/financial-executives-sitting-on-worthless-options/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Financial executives sitting on worthless options</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/20/financial-executives-sitting-on-worthless-options/">Financial executives sitting on worthless options</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:53:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120598561480051205.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/20/financial-executives-sitting-on-worthless-options/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1145180/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/20/financial-executives-sitting-on-worthless-options/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banks</category><category>employee stock</category><category>EmployeeStock</category><category>financials</category><category>stock options</category><category>StockOptions</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:53:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CEOs paid in stock options perform worse, study says]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/16/ceos-paid-in-stock-options-perform-worse-study-says/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/16/ceos-paid-in-stock-options-perform-worse-study-says/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/16/ceos-paid-in-stock-options-perform-worse-study-says/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/small-business/" rel="tag">Small Business</a></p>According to a new study of company leaders, CEOs <a href="http://byunews.byu.edu/archive07-OCT-CEOoptions.aspx">tend to approach business risks more prudently</a> when compensated with material pay packages as a larger percentage of overall compensation, instead of a heavy dose of stock options.<br /><br />From one point of view, this makes little sense: Many (many) executives perform just to the point of making stock prices rise quarter after quarter. After all, would you want to buy options with cheap strike prices only to sell them later for massive profit -- company long-term performance be damned? Due to the greedy nature of many CEOs, this situation seems head-on. The only problem here is that this study refutes that belief.<br /><br />It concluded that CEOs who are granted large numbers of stock options as a main form of compensation are more likely to <a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/rb/071012/column_lifting_ceo.html">make riskier decisions</a> with often negative repercussions on company stock prices. This also makes sense: With more stock options on the table, the risk-taker mentality may come out more for leaders-- who ascend to their positions usually by taking risks in the first place.<br /><br />The only problem is that most of those risks end in bitter disappointments instead of glowing results. Although stock options are geared toward motivating executives and middle managers to improve a company's future performance, the study's authors argue that that form of compensation <a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/rb/071012/column_lifting_ceo.html">is not all that effective in increasing a company's overall results</a>. Moral of the story: liberal stock option granting is a good idea, but just don't overload comp packages with them.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/16/ceos-paid-in-stock-options-perform-worse-study-says/">CEOs paid in stock options perform worse, study says</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 16 Oct 2007 18:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://byunews.byu.edu/archive07-OCT-CEOoptions.aspx>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/16/ceos-paid-in-stock-options-perform-worse-study-says/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1014018/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/16/ceos-paid-in-stock-options-perform-worse-study-says/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CEO Pay</category><category>CeoPay</category><category>compensation</category><category>corporate</category><category>management</category><category>performance</category><category>stock options</category><category>StockOptions</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 18:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hewlett-Packard settles largest-ever stock options backdating lawsuit]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/16/hewlett-packard-settles-largest-ever-stock-options-backdating-la/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/16/hewlett-packard-settles-largest-ever-stock-options-backdating-la/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/16/hewlett-packard-settles-largest-ever-stock-options-backdating-la/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hpq/" rel="tag">Hewlett-Packard (HPQ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a></p>When <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hewlett-packard-company/hpq/nys">Hewlett-Packard Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hewlett-packard-company/hpq/nys">HPQ</a>) bought <a href="http://www.hp.com/hpinfo/newsroom/press/2006/060725a.html">Mercury Interactive</a> a little over a year ago, the company probably did not know that a pretty large settlement would be forthcoming from several pension funds that accused the now-subsidiary of stock-option backdating. The <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iECyahuSBS3I0tEQ1-mNX3yRCu4AD8S9P7K01">settlement</a> reached earlier this week was $117.5 million, the largest of its kind.<br /><br />The second-largest out-of-court settlement due to accusatory stock options backdating was $18 million, so the Mercury case seems unique: why such a large settlement here? HP knew of the shenanigans when it purchased the company in 2006, although the extent was probably unknown at the time. Even with the $4.5 billion purchase price and the $117.5 million settlement, Mercury was still a wise investment for HP moving forward, as it's already become a lucrative area within the company.<br /><br />HP wants this situation and settlement to quickly be swept under the rug, which is no surprise. HP is shining these days under operational CEO Mark Hurd and from all appearances, can do little (or no) wrong on its march to continue crushing sales numbers and margins from competitors like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">Dell, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">DELL</a>). Oddly, the company has done an admirable job of taking focus away from the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/04/former-hp-chairwoman-patty-dunn-indicted/">corporate spying situation</a> from a year ago and other problems by using its core business strengths to perform very well quarter to quarter.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/16/hewlett-packard-settles-largest-ever-stock-options-backdating-la/">Hewlett-Packard settles largest-ever stock options backdating lawsuit</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:14:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/wsj/_a/h-p-settles-suit-over-mercury/n20071015151609990001>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/16/hewlett-packard-settles-largest-ever-stock-options-backdating-la/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1014349/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/16/hewlett-packard-settles-largest-ever-stock-options-backdating-la/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>backdating</category><category>Hewlett-Packard</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>Mercury Interactive</category><category>MercuryInteractive</category><category>settlement</category><category>stock options</category><category>StockOptions</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:14:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Thursday Market Rap: CC, SLW, DHI, KBH, and CKR]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/20/thursday-market-rap-cc-slw-dhi-kbh-and-ckr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/20/thursday-market-rap-cc-slw-dhi-kbh-and-ckr/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/20/thursday-market-rap-cc-slw-dhi-kbh-and-ckr/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cc/" rel="tag">Circuit City Stores (CC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dhi/" rel="tag">D.R.Horton (DHI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/kbh/" rel="tag">KB HOME (KBH)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/slw/" rel="tag">Silver Wheaton (SLW)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ckr/" rel="tag">CKE Restaurants (CKR)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/cc.gif" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Stocks moved mildly lower today taking a break from the bullish buying over the last two days. This is not really a bad sign, after all the S&amp;P 500 gained 3.5% Tuesday and Wednesday so losing 0.67% today still leaves it up 2.8% since the Fed cut. September equity options expire tomorrow so we may see some some extra volatility gong into the end of the week. </p>
<p>The NYSE had volume of 3.0 billion shares with 978 shares advancing while 2,331 declined for a loss of 34.43 points to close at 9,936.47. On the NASDAQ, 1.6 billion shares traded, 1,131 advanced and 1,864 declined for a loss of 12.19 to 2,654.29.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/circuit-city-stores-inc/cc/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Circuit City Stores</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/circuit-city-stores-inc/cc/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CC</a>) dropped $1.90 (-18%) to $8.67 on <a href="http://www.marketintelligencecenter.com/articles/440319">earnings.</a> <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/silver-wheaton-corp/slw/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Silver Wheaton Corp</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/silver-wheaton-corp/slw/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">SLW</a>) rose $0.99 (8%) to $14.02. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/d-r-horton-inc/dhi/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">D R Horton Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/d-r-horton-inc/dhi/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">DHI</a>) fell $1.11 (-7%) to $14.08. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kb-home/kbh/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">KB Home</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kb-home/kbh/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">KBH</a>) fell $1.95 (-7%) to $27.37. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cke-restaurants-inc/ckr/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CKE Restaurants Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cke-restaurants-inc/ckr/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CKR</a>) fell $0.99 (-6%) to $15.55 on <a href="http://www.marketintelligencecenter.com/articles/439852">$.15 earnings per share</a>. </p>
<p>In options there were 5.8 million puts and 7.7 million calls traded for a put/call open interest ratio of 0.75. The most active options lists were almost completely filled with ETF and index options. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/spdr-trust-series-1/spy/ase?tabs=quotesandnews">S&amp;P Depositary Receipts Trust ETF</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/spdr-trust-series-1/spy/ase?tabs=quotesandnews">SPY</a>) saw very heavy volume on the September 150 calls (SYHIT) with over 643,800 options trading. The SPY September 149 calls (SFBIS) also had a lot of activity moving 300,400 contracts. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/financial-select-sector-spdr-fun/xlf/ase?tabs=quotesandnews">Financial Sector SPDR ETF</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/financial-select-sector-spdr-fun/xlf/ase?tabs=quotesandnews">XLF</a>) were again active; the September 33 calls (XLFIG) with over 171,900 options trading. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/powershares-exchange-traded-fund-trust-powershares-qqq-trust-series-1/qqqq/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">PowerShares QQQ Trust ETF</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/powershares-exchange-traded-fund-trust-powershares-qqq-trust-series-1/qqqq/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">QQQQ</a>) saw heavy volume on the March 45 puts (QQQOS) with over 199,800 options trading and the March 48 puts (QQQOV) moved 180,500 options trading. <br />. <br /><br /><em>Kevin Kersten is an Options Analyst with </em><a href="http://www.investorsobserver.com/aolblogkk"><em>InvestorsObserver.com</em></a><em>. </em><em>Disclosure note: Mr. Kersten owns and or controls a diversified portfolio of long and short positions that may include holdings in companies he writes about.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/20/thursday-market-rap-cc-slw-dhi-kbh-and-ckr/">Thursday Market Rap: CC, SLW, DHI, KBH, and CKR</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:48:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/20/thursday-market-rap-cc-slw-dhi-kbh-and-ckr/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/994700/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/20/thursday-market-rap-cc-slw-dhi-kbh-and-ckr/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>calls puts</category><category>CallsPuts</category><category>Circuit City Stores (CC)</category><category>CircuitCityStores(cc)</category><category>options</category><category>Silver Wheaton (SLW)</category><category>SilverWheaton(slw)</category><category>stock options</category><category>StockOptions</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Kersten]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Altria sees heavy option activity with spin-off report]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/27/altria-sees-heavy-option-activity-with-spin-off-report/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/27/altria-sees-heavy-option-activity-with-spin-off-report/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/27/altria-sees-heavy-option-activity-with-spin-off-report/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mo/" rel="tag">Altria Group (MO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/eastern-europe/" rel="tag">Eastern Europe</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/mo.jpg" alt="Altria Group MO logo" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/altria-group-inc/mo/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Altria Group </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/altria-group-inc/mo/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">MO</a>) is up $1.35 to $70.54 on a report of a <a href="http://www.marketintelligencecenter.com/articles/427885 ">spin-off of international operations</a>.</p>
<p>Today, so far Altria Group moved 23,300 contracts on the September 70 calls and traded 4,700 contracts on the September 75 calls. In options there have been 59,605 contracts traded; of them 13,432 contracts are puts while 46,173 contracts are calls. For all options there are 297,119 put contracts open and 820,321 call contracts open. This means that the put/call open interest ratio for MO is 0.36. With so many more calls than puts being traded it also shows that speculators expect the stock to rise.</p>
<p>Call option activity is generally an indicator of bullish speculation on a stock. Call options give the buyer the right to purchase the stock at a set price. Each option contract is represents an interest in 100 shares of the underlying stock. Some of this call option activity may be people expecting a little boost from the spin-off. Altria's stock has moved from around $57 to $72 over the last year and is now trading near the high end of that range.</p>
<p>Looking at key metrics, Altria Group is solidly in line with its competitors in the industry. MO employs 175,000 people and had revenue of 71.22 billion with a gross margin of 46.6% and a net operating margin of 25.4%. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/british-american-tobacco-p-l-c/bti/ase?tabs=quotesandnews">British American Tobacc</a>o (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/british-american-tobacco-p-l-c/bti/ase?tabs=quotesandnews">BTI</a>) employs 97,000 people and had revenue of 19.49 billion with a gross margin of 71.65% and a net operating margin of 31.1%. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/reynolds-american-inc/rai/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Reynolds American</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/reynolds-american-inc/rai/nys?tabs=quotesandnews"> RAI</a>) employs 7,500 people and had revenue of 8.7 billion with a gross margin of 44.42% and a net operating margin of 26.28%. Altria's profit margin is of 17.1% is healthy and it has a high dividend yield is at 3.8%. <br /><br /><em>Kevin Kersten is an Options Analyst with </em><a href="http://www.investorsobserver.com/aolblogkk"><em>InvestorsObserver.com</em></a><em>. </em><em>Disclosure note: Mr. Kersten owns and or controls a diversified portfolio of long and short positions that may include holdings in companies he writes about.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/27/altria-sees-heavy-option-activity-with-spin-off-report/">Altria sees heavy option activity with spin-off report</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/27/altria-sees-heavy-option-activity-with-spin-off-report/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/975071/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/27/altria-sees-heavy-option-activity-with-spin-off-report/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Altria Group MO</category><category>AltriaGroupMo</category><category>British American Tobacco BTI</category><category>BritishAmericanTobaccoBti</category><category>calls puts</category><category>CallsPuts</category><category>Contracts</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Reynolds American RAI</category><category>ReynoldsAmericanRai</category><category>spin-off</category><category>Stock options</category><category>StockOptions</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Kersten]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google's brain drain]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/googles-brain-drain/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/googles-brain-drain/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/googles-brain-drain/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gt/" rel="tag">Goodyear Tire and Rubber (GT)</a></p><p>It happened at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>), and, to a lesser extent, at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>). Key employees are at the company for a few years. Their stock options vest, and the shares are longer doubling ever year. So, they exercise their options, pick up a few million dollars, and move on.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) is beginning to face the "Microsoft" problem now, according to The Wall Street Journal. As the newspaper points out, stock options <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118299113663550893.html?mod=hps_us_at_glance_technology">granted in 2003</a> have an average exercise price of $.49 and the shares now trade well north of $500. In 1990, Microsoft's stock was $1. By 1999, it was over $58. A lot of people made money, but, as the price growth disappeared, so did key employees.</p>
<p>Key members of Google's staff can now leave with significant fortunes and go to start-ups which give them a larger role and a new set of financial incentives. </p>
<p>Google could learn something from Microsoft, but a solution would be expensive. The search company could grant key employees large blocks of restricted stock which would vest over several years. There would be a financial consequence for the company's P&amp;L, but the move may be critical to keeping talent.</p>
<p>Even if it throws around more money, Google is faced with the fact that someone with $10 million may want to move on to another challenge, even if that person could make another $5 million by staying.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is a partner at 24/7 Wall St.</em> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/googles-brain-drain/">Google's brain drain</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 28 Jun 2007 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118299113663550893.html?mod=hps_us_at_glance_technology>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/googles-brain-drain/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/928463/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/googles-brain-drain/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>start-ups</category><category>stock options</category><category>StockOptions</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Family Dollar to take $5.7 million charge related to shareholder lawsuits -- That'll show em'!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/family-dollar-to-take-5-7-million-charge-related-to-shareholder/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/family-dollar-to-take-5-7-million-charge-related-to-shareholder/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/family-dollar-to-take-5-7-million-charge-related-to-shareholder/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fdo/" rel="tag">Family Dollar Stores (FDO)</a></p><p><img height="156" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/6000th_store.jpg" width="200" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /></p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/family-dollar-stores-inc/fdo/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Family Dollar</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/family-dollar-stores-inc/fdo/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">FDO</a>) has <a href="http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200706221728DOWJONESDJONLINE000843_FORTUNE5.htm">settled shareholder lawsuits</a> relating to the backdating of stock options issued to executives at the company. Under the terms of the settlement, Chairman and Chief Executive
<person></person>
Howard Levine, President and Chief Operating Officer
<person></person>
R. James Kelly, board member
<person></person>
George Mahoney and executive
<person></person>
C. Martin Sowers will give up a total of 210,000 stock options.</p>
<p>The company will also institute corporate governance reforms including the adoption of a majority-vote policy for uncontested elections of directors and the election of two additional independent directors. </p>
<p>Here's what bothers me: The company will be taking a charge of $5.7 million related to the settlement, including $3.5 million to cover the attorney's fees of the shareholders who brought the lawsuits.</p>
<p>This is my question: Given that the company clearly had ineffective internal controls that allowed top executives to receive backdated stock options, why should the company's shareholders have to pick up the tab for the legal fees? CEO Howard Levine made more than $3.1 million last year. Since he and other executives and directors were the ones responsible for options backdating, why shouldn't they pay legal fees?</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/family-dollar-to-take-5-7-million-charge-related-to-shareholder/">Family Dollar to take $5.7 million charge related to shareholder lawsuits -- That'll show em'!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 25 Jun 2007 09:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200706221728DOWJONESDJONLINE000843_FORTUNE5.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/family-dollar-to-take-5-7-million-charge-related-to-shareholder/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/925602/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/family-dollar-to-take-5-7-million-charge-related-to-shareholder/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Family Dollar</category><category>FamilyDollar</category><category>FD</category><category>stock options</category><category>StockOptions</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 09:56:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Option update 5-14-07: CLF, MOS spike on speculation]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/14/option-update-5-14-07-clf-and-mos-volume-and-implied-volatility-spi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/14/option-update-5-14-07-clf-and-mos-volume-and-implied-volatility-spi/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/14/option-update-5-14-07-clf-and-mos-volume-and-implied-volatility-spi/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amd/" rel="tag">Advanced Micro Dev (AMD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cleveland-cliffs-inc/clf/nys"><img align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" />Cleveland-Cliffs</a> </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cleveland-cliffs-inc/clf/nys">CLF</a>) -- calls bid up aggressively on heavy volume on buyout chatter. CLF, a producer of iron ore pellets, is recently up $1.75 to $75.30 on unconfirmed take over chatter. CLF has a market cap of $3 billion. CLF is expected to file its 1st quarter 2007 form 10-Q in early June. CLF May 75 calls have traded 105 times on transaction volume of 1,712 contracts above its open interest of 935 contracts. CLF May 75 calls are bid $1.70 above its theoretical value of $1.05. CLF May 80 calls have traded 69 times on transaction volume of 1,818 contracts above its theoretical value of 626 contracts according to Track Data. CLF May 80 calls are bid 45 cents above its theoretical value of 04 cents, suggesting hedging for upside risks.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mosaic-company-the/mos/nys">Mosaic Co.</a> </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mosaic-company-the/mos/nys">MOS</a>) -- volatility &amp; volume Spikes on buyout Speculation. MOS, a producer &amp; marketer of concentrated phosphate and potash crop nutrients, was spun out of Cargill in 2004. MOS is recently up $1.16 to $30.63. MOS is frequently mentioned as a take out target of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/potash-corporation-of-saskatchewan-inc/pot/nys">Potash Corp</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/potash-corporation-of-saskatchewan-inc/pot/nys">POT</a>). MOS call option volume of 4,791 contracts compares to put volume of 643 contracts. MOS June option implied volatility of 48 is above its 26-week average of 36 according to Track Data, suggesting larger for upside price risks.</p>
<p>Option volume leaders today are: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dendreon-corporation/dndn/nas">Dendreon Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dendreon-corporation/dndn/nas">DNDN</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/advanced-micro-devices-inc/amd/nys">Advanced Micro Devices</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/advanced-micro-devices-inc/amd/nys">AMD</a>),<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas"> Apple Inc.</a> (NADSAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">APPL</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mylan-laboratories-inc/myl/nys">Mylan Labs</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mylan-laboratories-inc/myl/nys">MYL</a>).</p>
<p><em>Daily Option Update is provided by Stock Options Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/14/option-update-5-14-07-clf-and-mos-volume-and-implied-volatility-spi/">Option update 5-14-07: CLF, MOS spike on speculation</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 14 May 2007 13:16:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/14/option-update-5-14-07-clf-and-mos-volume-and-implied-volatility-spi/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/895703/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/14/option-update-5-14-07-clf-and-mos-volume-and-implied-volatility-spi/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>AMD</category><category>buyout Speculation</category><category>BuyoutSpeculation</category><category>Cleveland Cliffs</category><category>ClevelandCliffs</category><category>CLF</category><category>DNDN</category><category>iron ore pellets</category><category>MOS</category><category>MYL</category><category>phosphate and potash crop nutrients</category><category>PhosphateAndPotashCropNutrients</category><category>POT</category><category>Potash</category><category>Stock Options</category><category>StockOptions</category><category>The Mosaic Co</category><category>TheMosaicCo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 13:16:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Option update 5-11-07: RACK implied volatility not confirming DELL speculation]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/11/option-update-5-11-07-rack-implied-volatility-not-confirming-de/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/11/option-update-5-11-07-rack-implied-volatility-not-confirming-de/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/11/option-update-5-11-07-rack-implied-volatility-not-confirming-de/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amd/" rel="tag">Advanced Micro Dev (AMD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amgn/" rel="tag">Amgen Inc (AMGN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/rackable-systems-inc/rack/nas"><strong><img align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" /></strong><strong>Rackable Systems</strong></a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/rackable-systems-inc/rack/nas">RACK</a>) implied volatility not confirming <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Dell</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">DELL</a>) speculation. RACK, a provider of servers and storage products, is recently up .54 to $12.49. Market speculation is circulating that Dell is interested in RACK. RACK June option implied volatility of 51 is below its 26-week average of 57 according to Track Data, suggesting decreasing price risk. </p>
<p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lyondell-chemical-company/lyo/nys">Lyondell Petro</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lyondell-chemical-company/lyo/nys">LYO</a>) volatility stays Elevated as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/occidental-petroleum-corporation/oxy/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Occidental Petroleum</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/occidental-petroleum-corporation/oxy/nys">OXY</a>) says it will sell LYO Holdings. LYO a global manufacture of chemicals, plastics and fuel products is recently up $2.91 to $36.00. OXY announced plans to sell all of its 20,990,070 holdings in LYO. LYO June option implied volatility of 34 is above its 26-week average of 31 according to Track Data, suggesting larger risk.</p>
<p>Option volume leaders today are: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dendreon-corporation/dndn/nas">Dendreon</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dendreon-corporation/dndn/nas">DNDN</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/advanced-micro-devices-inc/amd/nys">Advanced Micro Devices</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/advanced-micro-devices-inc/amd/nys">AMD</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amgen-inc/amgn/nas">Amgen Inc.</a> (NADSAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amgen-inc/amgn/nas">AMGN</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lyondell-chemical-company/lyo/nys">Lyondell Petro</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lyondell-chemical-company/lyo/nys">LYO</a>).</p>
<p><em>Daily Option Update is provided by Stock Options Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/11/option-update-5-11-07-rack-implied-volatility-not-confirming-de/">Option update 5-11-07: RACK implied volatility not confirming DELL speculation</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 11 May 2007 12:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/11/option-update-5-11-07-rack-implied-volatility-not-confirming-de/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/894161/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/11/option-update-5-11-07-rack-implied-volatility-not-confirming-de/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Lyondell Petro</category><category>LyondellPetro</category><category>Market speculation</category><category>MarketSpeculation</category><category>option implied volatility</category><category>OptionImpliedVolatility</category><category>Stock Options</category><category>StockOptions</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 12:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Option update 5-8-07: Urban Outfitters volatility increases before earnings]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/08/option-update-5-8-07-urban-outfitters-volatility-increases-befo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/08/option-update-5-8-07-urban-outfitters-volatility-increases-befo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/08/option-update-5-8-07-urban-outfitters-volatility-increases-befo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/csco/" rel="tag">Cisco Systems (CSCO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mot/" rel="tag">Motorola (MOT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cfc/" rel="tag">Countrywide Financial (CFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/urbn/" rel="tag">Urban Outfitters (URBN)</a></p><p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/countrywide-financial-corporation/cfc/nys"><img align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" />Countrywide Financial Corp.</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/countrywide-financial-corporation/cfc/nys">CFC</a>) implied volatility Elevated as CFC share price retraces.<br /></p>
<ul>
    <li>CFC, the largest U.S. home mortgage lender, is recently up $1.44 to $39.92 on renewed buyout chatter. <br /></li>
    <li>CFC May option implied volatility of 48 &amp; June at 41 is above its 26-week average of 34 according to Track Data, suggesting larger price risks.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/urban-outfitters-inc/urbn/nas">Urban Outfitters Inc.</a></strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/urban-outfitters-inc/urbn/nas">URBN</a>) implied volatility suggests increased risk into EPS. <br /></p>
<ul>
    <li>URBN, a lifestyle merchandising company, announced 1Q same store sales fell 2%. <br /></li>
    <li>URBN will report EPS on 5/10.  BUCK has an accumulate rating on URBN with a $31 price target. <br /></li>
    <li>URBN May option implied volatility is at 53, June is at 45; above its 26-week average of 42 according to Track Data, suggesting larger risk.</li>
</ul>
<p>Option volume leaders today are: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dendreon-corporation/dndn/nas">Dendreon Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dendreon-corporation/dndn/nas">DNDN</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ak-steel-holding-corporation/aks/nys">AK Steel Holding Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ak-steel-holding-corporation/aks/nys">AKS</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/motorola-inc/mot/nys">Motorola Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/motorola-inc/mot/nys">MOT</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cisco-systems-inc/csco/nas">Cisco Systems Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cisco-systems-inc/csco/nas">CSCO</a>).</p>
<p><em>Daily Option Update is provided by Stock Options Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/08/option-update-5-8-07-urban-outfitters-volatility-increases-befo/">Option update 5-8-07: Urban Outfitters volatility increases before earnings</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 08 May 2007 15:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/08/option-update-5-8-07-urban-outfitters-volatility-increases-befo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/891419/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/08/option-update-5-8-07-urban-outfitters-volatility-increases-befo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aks</category><category>cfc</category><category>csco</category><category>dndn</category><category>implied volatility</category><category>ImpliedVolatility</category><category>mot</category><category>option implied volatility</category><category>OptionImpliedVolatility</category><category>Stock Options</category><category>StockOptions</category><category>urbn</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 15:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Interesting timing on Apple's green initiatives]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/04/interesting-timing-on-apples-green-initiatives/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/04/interesting-timing-on-apples-green-initiatives/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/04/interesting-timing-on-apples-green-initiatives/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><p>Color me a cynic, but I have a hard time feeling the sincerity in <a href="http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/worldbiz/archives/2007/05/04/2003359449">Steve Jobs' promise</a> to make <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) a more environmentally friendly business, with initiatives like eliminating certain toxic substances from its products and promoting recycling. Jobs issued a five-page memo discussing the new, greener Apple.</p>
<p>If this announcement had come a year ago, in a time when Apple wasn't in the midst of an options-backdating scandal with accusations flying all the way up to Mr. Jobs, I'd applaud the company's efforts. In a way, I still do. But it also seems like a diversionary tactic to draw attention away from governance scandals surrounding the company.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.portfolio.com/views/blogs/daily-brief/2007/05/03/apples-to-get-greener">Portfolio.com</a> wrote that, "As Home Depot and Wal-Mart have recently discovered, announcing green initiatives in the face of bad news is a great way to divert media attention from things like $100 million CEO pay packages and ongoing battles over worker wages and benefits."</p>
<p>The magazine also points out that Al Gore's presence on the board of directors may have contributed to the decision, although Gore recently backed the board in opposing shareholder proposals that would have called for more stringent environmental standards at the company.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/04/interesting-timing-on-apples-green-initiatives/">Interesting timing on Apple's green initiatives</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 04 May 2007 18:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.portfolio.com/views/blogs/daily-brief/2007/05/03/apples-to-get-greener>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/04/interesting-timing-on-apples-green-initiatives/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/888590/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/04/interesting-timing-on-apples-green-initiatives/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Al Gore</category><category>AlGore</category><category>Enivronment</category><category>Steve Jobs</category><category>SteveJobs</category><category>Stock Options</category><category>StockOptions</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 18:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[How much did Wal-Mart's CEO really earn?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/20/how-much-did-wal-marts-ceo-really-earn/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/20/how-much-did-wal-marts-ceo-really-earn/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/20/how-much-did-wal-marts-ceo-really-earn/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a></p><p><strong><img style="WIDTH: 111px; HEIGHT: 177px" height="225" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/04/bp261310.jpg" width="157" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /></strong></p>
<p><strong>Wal-Mart's CEO Earned 6.3 Million in 2006</strong></p>
<p>That was the headline for today's <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117704129667976629.html?mod=todays_us_marketplace"><em>Wall Street Journal's </em>coverage</a> of Wal-Mart (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WMT</a>) CEO Lee Scott's pay package. The piece goes on to say that "<a class="times rolloverQuote" onmouseover="window.status=('  Quotes &amp; Research for WMT');return true" onmouseout="window.status=('');return true" href="http://online.wsj.com/quotes/main.html?type=djn&amp;symbol=wmt">Wal-Mart Stores</a> Inc. Chief Executive Lee Scott received base pay, bonuses and perquisites of $6.3 million last fiscal year in addition to grants of restricted stock and options valued at $17 million, the retailer disclosed in its proxy filing yesterday."</p>
<p>Here's the thing: If Lee Scott earned 17 million dollars in restricted stock and options, why does the headline say that he earned 6.3 million? The Federal Accounting Standards Board and SEC now require companies to expense stock options when they are issued, and this make sense. <a href="http://www.senate.gov/~levin/newsroom/release.cfm?id=211279">As Warren Buffett said</a> "If options aren't a form of compensation, what are they? If compensation isn't an expense, what is it? If expenses shouldn't go into the calculation of earnings, where in the world should they go?" </p>
<p>So I ask the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>: Why not report Mr. Scott's earnings the same way the company reports them in its <a href="http://sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/104169/000119312507085248/ddef14a.htm#tx36175_28">proxy statement</a>?</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/20/how-much-did-wal-marts-ceo-really-earn/">How much did Wal-Mart's CEO really earn?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/20/how-much-did-wal-marts-ceo-really-earn/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/879192/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/20/how-much-did-wal-marts-ceo-really-earn/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>executive compensation</category><category>ExecutiveCompensation</category><category>stock options</category><category>StockOptions</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Option update 4-17-07: AMZN -- near-term Risk into earnings]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/17/option-update-4-17-07-amzn-near-term-risk-into-earnings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/17/option-update-4-17-07-amzn-near-term-risk-into-earnings/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/17/option-update-4-17-07-amzn-near-term-risk-into-earnings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mrk/" rel="tag">Merck and Co (MRK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/x/" rel="tag">U.S. Steel (X)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas"><img align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/04/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" alt="" /><strong>Amazon.com, Inc.</strong></a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">AMZN</a>) May implied volatility at 43, July at 33; suggests near term Risk. AMZN is recently trading at $45.08. AMZN will report earnings on 4/24. AMZN May option implied volatility of 43 is above its 26-week average of 37 according to Track Data, suggesting larger price fluctuations. </p>
<p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/united-states-steel-corporation/x/nys">US Steel</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/united-states-steel-corporation/x/nys">X</a>) option implied volatility Flat at 40 into EPS as X near Record High. X is recently down .93 to $107.15. X will report EPS on 4/24. X May option implied volatility of 40 is near its 26-week average according to Track Data, suggesting non-directional price fluctuations.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merck-and-co-inc/mrk/nys">Merck</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys/fundamentals?freq=1">MRK</a>) implied volatility suggests non-directional risk into earnings and outlook. MRK will to report earnings on 4/19. MRK over all option implied volatility of 20 is near its 26-week average according to Track Data, suggesting non-directional price fluctuations. </p>
<p>Option volume leaders today are: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo! Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-johns-dc/jnj/nys">Johnson &amp; Johnson</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-johns-dc/jnj/nys">JNJ</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">Intel Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">INTC</a>).</p>
<p><em>Daily Option Update is provided by Stock Options Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com.</em><br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/17/option-update-4-17-07-amzn-near-term-risk-into-earnings/">Option update 4-17-07: AMZN -- near-term Risk into earnings</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:42:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/17/option-update-4-17-07-amzn-near-term-risk-into-earnings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/876130/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/17/option-update-4-17-07-amzn-near-term-risk-into-earnings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Amazon</category><category>amzn</category><category>implied volatility suggests</category><category>ImpliedVolatilitySuggests</category><category>intc</category><category>Intel</category><category>jnj</category><category>mrk</category><category>option implied volatility</category><category>OptionImpliedVolatility</category><category>price fluctuations</category><category>PriceFluctuations</category><category>Stock Options</category><category>StockOptions</category><category>x</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:42:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Option update 4-12-07: Ipsco, Raser Tech]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/12/option-update-4-12-07-ipsco-raser-tech/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/12/option-update-4-12-07-ipsco-raser-tech/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/12/option-update-4-12-07-ipsco-raser-tech/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cit/" rel="tag">CIT Group (CIT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rimm/" rel="tag">Research in Motion (RIMM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wm/" rel="tag">Washington Mutual (WM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ipsco-inc/ips/nys"><strong><img align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/04/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" /></strong><strong>Ipsco Inc.</strong></a><strong> </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ipsco-inc/ips/nys">IPS</a> ) -- volatility up; indicates more Risk; release of discussions of acquisition. IPS, a low cost producer of energy tubular sans steel plate, is recently up $15 to $156.19. IPS says "it is currently in discussions that could lead to a potential acquisition of the company." IPS has a market cap of $6.9 billion with long-term debt of $879 million. IPS reported 2006 total revenue of $3.7 billion. IPS call option volume of 4,751 contracts compares to put volume of 1,506 contracts. IPS April option implied volatility is at 47, May is at 43 above its 26-week average of 38 according to Track Data, suggesting larger price risks. </p>
<p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/raser-technologies-inc/rz/ase">Raser Technologies</a></strong> (AMEX: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/raser-technologies-inc/rz/ase">RZ</a>) -- option implied volatility Elevated on agreements win; RZ rallies 19%. RZ has pending patents and proprietary intellectual property covering breakthrough technologies. RZ is up $2.00 to $9.20. RZ entered into a series of agreements with UTC Power to provide up to 135 PureCylce geothermal power systems for three Raser power plants. RZ call option volume of 4,366 contracts compares to put volume of 2,255 contracts. RZ May option implied volatility of 128 is above its 26-week average of 108 according to Track Data, suggesting larger price risks.</p>
<p>Option volume leaders today are: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dendreon-corporation/dndn/nas">Dendreon Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dendreon-corporation/dndn/nas">DNDN</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-inc/c/nys">Citigroup Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-inc/c/nys">C</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/washington-mutual-inc/wm/nys">Washington Mutual</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/washington-mutual-inc/wm/nys">WM</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/research-in-motion-limited/rimm/nas">Research in Motion</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/research-in-motion-limited/rimm/nas">RIMM</a>).<br /><br /><em>Daily Option Update is provided by Stock Options Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/12/option-update-4-12-07-ipsco-raser-tech/">Option update 4-12-07: Ipsco, Raser Tech</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Apr 2007 13:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/12/option-update-4-12-07-ipsco-raser-tech/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/872819/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/12/option-update-4-12-07-ipsco-raser-tech/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>C</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>Discussions of Acquisition</category><category>DiscussionsOfAcquisition</category><category>DNDN</category><category>IPS</category><category>Option volume leaders</category><category>OptionVolumeLeaders</category><category>RIMM</category><category>RZ</category><category>Stock Options</category><category>StockOptions</category><category>WM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 13:22:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
